View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 The British Empire Consolidates its Property
1/2
By Matthew Ehret-Kump
While Canadian foreign policy has always fol-
lowed the British lead, there have been brief in-
stances of resistance. The cases of the 1970s
sanctions of apartheid South Africa and Canadasnon-participation in the precursor of the British
Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Iraq War in 2002
spring immediately to mind. However, under
Prime Minister Stephen Harper who took power
in 2006 and now leads a majority government
with those near unchallenged powers enjoyed
with such majorities, the unquestioned obedience
to British endgame geopolitics has never been so
strong.
Though Canadas cooperation in the defence andcultivation of the heroin production of Afghani-
stans Helmand province had already been under-way from the beginning of the Afghan war, this
overt military policy became significantly more
aggressive with the Arab Spring in 2011. It was at
this time that Canada committed its military to
provide 10% of the air support and logistics dur-
ing the regime change program that illegally
killed Muamar Qaddafi under the umbrella of
NATO. In hindsight, it was discovered that thegreatest atrocities of this war were not to have
been committed by the disposed head of state, but
rather, by those moralizing forces who conducted
the humanitarian intervention, armed radicalIslamists and killed 70 000 innocent Libyan civil-
ians. The official legal precedent for this war was
the anti-nation state doctrine of R2P.
This program was continued with expelling Syr-
ian diplomats and shutting down the Syrian em-
bassy in March 2012, merely weeks after the An-
nan Peace Plan was begun (and later sabotaged),to the effect that all illusions of Canadian peace-
making and diplomacy was exposed as an illu-
sion. Before Canada, the only nation to shut down
Syrian diplomatic missions was the UK. This ag-
gressive policy was repeated with Canadas shut-down of the Iranian embassy in early September
2012 modelled again after the British precedent.
Since Canadas actions so obediently followed
British geopolitical doctrine from 2006-2012, anovert branding as British property has been called
for.
The rebranding of Canada
In April 2011, the British makeover officially
began with the renaming of the Canadian mili-
tary. This policy saw Harper pass a law which re-
inserted the Royal into all branches of the Ca-
nadian military. Controversy briefly erupted asConstitutional lawyers and defence specialists
pointed out that Section 15 of the British North
America Act of 1867 states that the command of
the Canadian military is not vested in Parliament,
but rather in the Crown. This mandate was re-affirmed with Section 14 of the National Defence
Act of 1985 with the words: The CanadianForces are the armed forces of Her Majesty
raised by Canada and consist of one Service
called the Canadian Armed Forces. Universityof Ottawa defence specialist Philippe Lagassargued during this time that while the military is
answerable to the Parliament, it is accountable
and obedient only to Ministers of the Crown. Any
lingering denial of this control of the Canadian
military by Ministers of the Crown was highly
shaken.
Embassies Unite:
The British Consolidate their Property
Up until recently, Harpers rabid anglophilia was consid-
ered little more than a bizarre fetish for onlookers, but has
now blossomed into a global security threat.
7/30/2019 The British Empire Consolidates its Property
2/2
2
This was followed immediately by Harpers renam-
ing the main wall in the Canadian Foreign Office
Headquarters the Sovereign Wall, deriving itsname from the gigantic mural sized portrait of
Queen Elisabeth. Not only was this unsightly por-
trait forced into public display in one Ottawa build-
ing, but an accompanying order was passed forcing
portraits of the Queen to be mounted upon the walls
of every Canadian embassy in the world. While
many onlookers watched in bewilderment, the fa-
natic anglophile could still be heard shouting but
the Monarchy is only a symbol! The British Empire
carries no real power!
Embassies Unite
As of September 23 2012, many Canadian embas-sies the world over will no longer simply have Ca-
nadian flags hanging from their flag poles, butrather the Canadian ambassadors and their respec-
tive staff within and the Canadian Maple Leaf flag
without will now be joined with British ambassa-
dors and the Union Jack. Ministers of Foreign Af-
fairs of the UK and Canada (John Baird and Wil-
liam Hague) have officially announced the melding
of the embassies of
both nations! Ostensi-
bly, this measure is
being undertaken to
save money, but the
true motive for suchovert consolidation of
the British Empirespossessions can only
be addressed if one lets
go of all popular illu-
sions regarding the true
workings of the shadow empire maintained by the
London-centered oligarchy. This process is madethe more dangerous as the Empire is not unaware of
the demise of its own monetary system.
In the context of the collapse of the British con-
trolled world monetary system, these policies are
intended to do nothing less then set fire to the entire
African and Middle Eastern worlds, by fuelling
what Samuel P Huntington dubbed the Clash ofCivilizations doctrine, to the point of risking ther-
monuclear warfare with Russia and China.
Stephen Harper and Thomas
Mulcair: Agents of the British
Empire.
For those who still believe that the Privy Council ofCanada is merely a relic of old traditions long dead exer-
cising no more control than the Queen, they would do
well to reconsider that view as it is not the people, or
parliament who hold the allegiance of those who are
introduced into its roster, but rather the Queen of Eng-
land.
I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear that I shall
be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty's
Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be
treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faith-
fully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opin-
ion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and re-
vealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly
treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do
as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Maj-
esty.
That both Stephen Harper, as well as NDP leader Tho-
mas Mulcair have taken this oath of allegiance and se-
crecy should send alarm bells in the minds of any think-
ing citizen. This also means that these illustrious menhave joined the ranks with such national disasters and
foreign agents of influence as Maurice Strong, Paul Des-
marais of Power Corporation, Lord Conrad Black,
Prince Phillip of Edinburg, and the current head of the
powerful Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE)
John Manley.
Being a member of this select group does not immedi-
ately prove an individual is engaged in treason anymore
than someones participation in a Bilderberger meeting
or freemasonic society. It does however speak volumesif the person in question is actively carrying out the in-
tentions of a financial oligarchy which has explicitly
stated their intention to reduce the world population
from the current 7 billion to less than one (see
Environmentalism and the General Welfare Make Poor
Bedfellows on page 21).
Baird and Hague an-
nounce joint embas-
sies in Ottawa.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II