The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64,13_bibl

8/3/2019 The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 4364,13_bibl

1/49

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity,minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in thePhilosophy of Science, 18, 117132.

Adams, F., & Aizawa, K.(2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical

Psychology, 14, 4364.Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran,

S., Coley, J. D., & Shafto, P.(2001). Why essences are essential inthe psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 5969.

Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A.(1995). The roleof covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.Cognition, 54, 299352.

Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P.(1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis. Thebrain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution.

Current Anthropology, 36, 199221.Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the aboutness of mental

states. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 337372.

Alibali, M., & DiRusso, A. A.(1999). The function of gesture in learningto count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14,3756.

Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E.(2007). Contribution of hand motorcircuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 563576.

Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2005). The eects

267


2/49

268 Bibliography

of naming practices on childrens understanding of living things.

In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedingsof the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 139144). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P.(1983). Perception of numerical invariancein neonates. Child Development, 54, 695701.

Aristotle. (ca. 340 B.C.E.). Meteorologica. Retrieved May20, 2011, from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/

meteorology/book1.html.

Atran, S.(1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive

universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,21, 547569.

Atran, S. (2001). The case for modularity: Sin or salvation? Evolutionand Cognition, 7, 110.

Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N.(2004). Evolution and devolution ofknowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropo-logical Institute, 10, 395420.

Aunger, R. (Ed.). (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memeticsas a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baillargeon, R.(2004). Infants reasoning about hidden objects: Evidencefor event-general and event-specific expectations. DevelopmentalScience, 7, 391424.

Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object perma-nence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191208.

Barabashev, A. G. (1997). In support of significant modernization oforiginal mathematical texts (in defense of presentism). PhilosophiaMathematica, 5, 2141.

Barrett, H. C.(2004). Design versus descent in Shuar childrens reasoning

about animals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 2550.Barrett, H. C.(2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity.

Mind & Language, 20, 259287.

Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R.(2006). Modularity in cognition: Framingthe debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628647.

Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of thedivine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608619.

Barrett, J. L.(2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD:AltaMira Press.

Barrett, J. L., Burdett, E. R., & Porter, T. J.(2009). Counterintuitiveness
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/meteorology/book1.htmlhttp://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/meteorology/book1.htmlhttp://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/meteorology/book1.htmlhttp://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/meteorology/book1.html


3/49

Bibliography 269

in folktales: Finding the cognitive optimum. Journal of Cognition

and Culture, 9, 271287.Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural en-tity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology,31, 219247.

Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts:The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and trans-mission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1,69100.

Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke,

E. S. (2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children.Cognition, 98, 199222.

Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Bassi, M. (1988). On the Borana calendrical system: A preliminary fieldreport. Current Anthropology, 29, 619624.

Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy, 70,661680.

Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006). Infant brains detect arith-

metic errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America, 103, 1264912653.

Berger, L. R., Churchill, S. E., De Klerk, B., & Quinn, R. L. (2008).Small-bodied humans from Palau, Micronesia. PLoS One, 3, e1780.

Bering, J. M.(2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and BrainSciences, 29, 453462.

Bering, J. M.(2011). The God instinct. The psychology of souls, destinyand the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealy.

Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. (2005). Reasoning about

dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16,360381.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001a). Chimpanzee numerical competence:Cardinal and ordinal skills. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.), Primate originsof human cognition and behavior (pp. 199225). Tokyo: Springer.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001b). Use of numerical symbols by thechimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the intro-duction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193199.

Bisazza, A., Pier, L., Serena, G., & Agrillo, C. (2010). Ontogeny ofnumerical abilities in fish. PLoS ONE, 5, e15516.


4/49

270 Bibliography

Blackburn, S. (2001). Normativity a la mode. Journal of Ethics, 5, 139

153.Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006).Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 10201022.

Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes baby. How child development explains whatmakes us human. London: Arrow Books.

Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147151.

Bloom, P. (2009). Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. InJ. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate. Scientific,

philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion(pp. 118127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S.(2007). Childhood origins of adult resistanceto science. Science, 316, 996997.

Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1992). The origins of psychological axioms ofarithmetic and geometry. Mind & Language, 7, 409416.

Blyth, E. (1835). An attempt to classify the varieties of animals, withobservations on the marked seasonal and other changes which nat-urally take place in various British species, and which do not con-

stitute varieties. Magazine of Natural History, 8, 4053.Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures.

Current Anthropology, 39, 591614.

Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., & Mehler, J.(2002). The human first hy-pothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objectsin the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388426.

Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2010). How not to attackIntelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical misconceptions aboutmethodological naturalism. Foundations of Science, 15, 227244.

Boulter, S. J. (2007). The evolutionary argument and the metaphilos-ophy of commonsense. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 369382.

Bowler, P. J.(2003). Evolution. The history of an idea (3rd ed.). Berkeley& Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Bowler, P. J.(2008). What Darwin disturbed. Isis, 99, 560567.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase humanadaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125143.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.(1996). Why culture is common, but culturalevolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 7793.

Boyer, C. B.(1944). Fundamental steps in the development of numeration.


5/49

Bibliography 271

Isis, 35, 153168.

Boyer, P. (1998). Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: How evolvedintuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. American Anthro-pologist, 100, 876889.

Boyer, P. (2000). Natural epistemology or evolved metaphysics? Devel-opmental evidence for early-developed, intuitive, category-specific,incomplete, and stubborn metaphysical presumptions. Philosophi-cal Psychology, 13, 277296.

Boyer, P.(2002). Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religiousthought. London: Vintage.

Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C.(2005). Domain specicity and intuitive ontol-ogy. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology(pp. 96118). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious con-cepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive repre-sentations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535564.

Brannon, E. M.(2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledgein infancy. Cognition, 83, 223240.

Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S.(2002). The evolution and ontogeny of

ordinal numerical ability. In M. Beko, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt(Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectiveson animal cognition (pp. 197204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brauer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006).Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog,causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 3846.

Breuer, T., Ndoundou-Hockembal, M., & Fishlock, V. (2005). First ob-servation of tool use in wild gorillas. PLoS Biology, 3, e380.S.

Brewer, W., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation

in scientists and children. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.),Explanation and cognition (pp. 279298). Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Brown, P., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Jatmiko, Sap-tomo, E. W., & Due, R. A. (2004). A new small-bodied homininfrom the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature, 431, 10551061.

Brunet, M., F., G., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D.,Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.-R., De Bo-nis, L., Coppens, Y., Dejax, J., Denys, C., Duringer, P., Eisenmann,


6/49

272 Bibliography

V., Fanone, G., Fronty, P., Geraads, D., Lehmann, T., Lihoreau, F.,

Louchart, A., Mahamat, A., Merceron, G., Mouchelin, G., Otero,O., Campomanes, P. P., Ponce De Leon, M., Rage, J. C., Sapanet,M., Schuster, M., Sudre, J., Tassy, P., Valentin, X., Vignaud, P.,Viriot, L., Zazzo, A., & Zollikofer, C.(2002). A new hominid fromthe Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature, 418, 145151.

Buon, comte de, G.-L. L. (1766). Histoire naturelle generale et par-ticuliere. Avec la description du cabinet du roi (Vol. 14). Paris:Imprimerie royale.

Buridan, J.(14th c. [2009]). Impetus and its applications. In T. McGrew,

M. Alspector-Kelly, & F. Allho (Eds.), Philosophy of science. Anhistorical anthology (pp. 8690). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Burkart, J., & Heschl, A. (2005, August). Do nonhuman primates un-derstand the mentalistic content of seeing? Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.

Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mothers face recognition in newborn infants:Learning and memory. Infant and Child Development, 10, 6774.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: Anevolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,

100, 204232.Butterworth, B.(1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.

Butterworth, B.(2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Jour-nal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 318.

Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D.(2008). Numericalthought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Aus-tralian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America, 105, 1317913184.

Buzaglo, M. (2002). The logic of concept expansion. Cambridge: Cam-

bridge University Press.Cacciari, C., Levorato, M. C., & Cicogna, P.(1997). Imagination at work:

Conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In T. B. Ward,S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigationof conceptual structures and processes (pp. 145177). WashingtonD.C.: American Psychological Association.

Cain, C. R. (2006). Implications of the marked artifacts of the MiddleStone Age of Africa. Current Anthropology, 47, 675681.

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A non-verbal false belief task: Theperformance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70,


7/49

Bibliography 273

381395.

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory ofmind? 30 Years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187192.

Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura,S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset ofmental-state reasoning. Evidence from five cultures. PsychologicalScience, 16, 378384.

Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the naturalistic turn, or, how realphilosophy of science is done. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006).

Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-oldchildren. PLoS Biology, 4, e125.

Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Whatare the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical reviewof the clinical evidence. Neuropsychology, 20, 213261.

Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptualknowledge: The evidence from category-specific deficits. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 7, 354361.

Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge sys-

tems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 10, 134.

Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus,133, 5968.

Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.(1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophyof Science, 63, 515533.

Carnap, R.(1945). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12, 288309.

Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Estevez, A., Lozano, A., De-vlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009). An anatomical signature for

literacy. Nature, 461, 983986.Carruthers, P. (2002). The roots of scientific reasoning: Infancy, modu-

larity and the art of tracking. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Sie-gal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 7395). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. Oxford: ClarendonPress.

Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basisof science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cela-Conde, C. J., & Ayala, F. J. (2003). Genera of the human lin-


8/49

274 Bibliography

eage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United

States of America, 100, 76847689.Chambers, R.(1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London:John Churchill.

Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientificprogress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chemla, K.(2003). Generality above abstraction: The general expressedin terms of the paradigmatic in mathematics in ancient China. Sci-ence in Context, 16, 413458.

Chemla, K., & Guo, S. (2004). Les neuf chapitres. Le classique

mathematique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris:Dunod.

Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basicare behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey tradingbehavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517537.

Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? CurrentBiology, 19, 9951008.

Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999).Dierential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lob-

ules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11,617630.

Chomsky, N.(1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag & Paris: Mouton.

Chomsky, N.(1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chrisomalis, S.(2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cam-bridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 3752.

Chrisomalis, S.(2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. M.(1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature

of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Clark, A. (2006). Material symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 291

307.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58,719.

Clendinnen, F. J.(1989). Evolutionary explanation and the justification ofbelief. In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionaryepistemology (pp. 458474). Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.

Code, L. (1996). What is natural about epistemology naturalized? Amer-


9/49

Bibliography 275

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 122.

Cohen, L. B., & Marks, K. S. (2002). How infants process addition andsubtraction events. Developmental Science, 5, 186212.

Cordes, S., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2001). Variability signaturesdistinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and smallnumbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698707.

Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in Europeannatural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 6783.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994a). Beyond intuition and instinct blind-ness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cogni-

tion, 50, 4177.Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994b). Origins of domain specificity: The

evolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gel-man (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition andculture (pp. 85116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisti-cians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on

judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 173.

Dacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. V.(2008). Evidence for counting in insects.

Animal Cognition, 11, 683689.Dantzig, T. (1954). Number, the language of science (4th, revised and

augmented ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Dierential enhancement of work-ing memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 83, 4856.

Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of SouthAfrica. Nature, 115, 195199.

Dartnall, T.(2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active external-

ism, internalism and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135143.Darwin, C.(1838). Notebook d: Transmutation of species. Retrieved De-

cember 15, 2009, from http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

Darwin, C.(1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selectionor the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London:John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1881). Letter 13230, C. Darwin to W. Graham, July 1881.
http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1


10/49

276 Bibliography

Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/

entry-13230.Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R.(1983). The mathematical experience. London:Pelican.

Dawkins, R.(1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Dawkins, R.(2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Miin.

Dear, P. (2006). The intelligibility of nature. How science makes sense ofthe world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Decock, L. (2008). The conceptual basis of numerical abilities: One-

to-one correspondence versus the successor relation. PhilosophicalPsychology, 21, 459473.

De Cruz, H. (2006). Why are some numerical concepts more successfulthan others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of numberconcepts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 306323.

De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural numberrepresentation. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 475490.

De Cruz, H. (2009a). An enhanced argument for innate elemen-tary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications. In

B. Van Kerkhove (Ed.), New perspectives on mathematical prac-tices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics (pp. 185206). New Jersey: World Scientific.

De Cruz, H. (2009b). Is linguistic determinism an empirically testablehypothesis? Logique et Analyse, 208, 327341.

De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S.(in press). Evolu-tionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies inscientific understandingThe case of human evolution. Biology &

Philosophy, 22, 351368.De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010a). The innateness hypothesis and

mathematical concepts. Topoi, 29, 313.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J.(2010b). Paleys iPod: The cognitive basisof the design argument within natural theology. Zygon: Journal ofReligion and Science, 45, 665684.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J.(2010c). Science as structured imagination.Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 2944.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press a). Evolved cognitive biases andthe epistemic status of scientific beliefs. Philosophical Studies.
http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230


11/49

Bibliography 277

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press b). Mathematical symbols as

epistemic actions. Synthese.De Cruz, H., Neth, H., & Schlimm, D. (2010). The cognitive basis ofarithmetic. In B. Lowe & T. Muller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophyof mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp.59106). London: College Publications.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Dehaene, S.(2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A loga-rithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145

147.Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and

arithmetic: The neuronal recycling hypothesis. In S. Dehaene,J. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkeybrain to human brain (pp. 133157). Cambridge, MA & London:MIT Press.

Dehaene, S. (2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. The case of arith-metic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 232259.

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear?

Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonianindigene cultures. Science, 320, 12171220.

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E. S., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999).Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imagingevidence. Science, 284, 970974.

Delagnes, A., & Roche, H.(2005). Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills:The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of HumanEvolution, 48, 435472.

DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive

Sciences, 8, 6670.de Maillet, B.(1748). Telliamed ou entretiens dun philosophe indien avec

un missionnaire francois sur la diminution de la mer, la formationde la terre, lorigine de lhomme, & c. Amsterdam: Honore & Fils.

De Morgan, A. (1830). On the study and diculties of mathematics.London: Paul Kegan.

Dennett, D. C.(1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.

Dennett, D. C.(1995). Darwins dangerous idea. Evolution and the mean-ings of life. London: Allen Lane.

Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phe-


12/49

278 Bibliography

nomenon. Oxford: Allen Lane.

De Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D.(2005). A contextual approach to scientificunderstanding. Synthese, 144, 137170.

dErrico, F. (1995). A new model and its implications for the origin ofwriting: The La Marche antler revisited. Cambridge ArchaeologicalJournal, 5, 163206.

dErrico, F. (1998). Palaeolithic origins of artificial memory systems:An evolutionary perspective. In C. Renfrew & C. Scarre (Eds.),Cognition and material culture: The archaeology of symbolic storage(pp. 1950). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological

Research.Descartes, R. (1637 [1988]). Le discours de la methode, la dioptrique, les

meteores et la geometrie. In F. Alquie (Ed.), uvres philosophiquesde Descartes (pp. 549761). Paris: Classiques Garnier.

De Smedt, J.(2011). Common minds, uncommon thoughts. A philosoph-ical anthropological investigation of uniquely human creative behav-ior, with an emphasis on artistic ability, religious reflection, andscientific study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ghent University.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2010). Toward an integrative approach of

cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies ofart. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 695719.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011a). The cognitive appeal of the cos-mological argument. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion,23, 103-122.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011b). The role of material culture inhuman time representation: Calendrical systems as extensions ofmental time travel. Adaptive Behavior, 19, 6376.

De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., & Braeckman, J. (2009). Why the human

brain is not an enlarged chimpanzee brain. In H. Hgh-Olesen,J. Tnnesvang, & P. Bertelsen (Eds.), Human characteristics. Evo-lutionary perspectives on human mind and kind (pp. 168181). New-castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Devitt, M. (1996). Coming to our senses. A naturalistic program forsemantic localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Cultural primatology comes of age. Nature,399, 635636.

dHalloy, J.-J. dOmalius.(1846). Note sur la succession des etres vivants.Bulletins de lacademie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-


13/49

Bibliography 279

arts de Belgique, 13, 581591.

Diamond, J. (1992). The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee. How ouranimal heritage aects the way we live. London: Vintage.

Diamond, J., & Bishop, K. D.(1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengbanpeople, Indonesian New Guinea. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),Folkbiology (pp. 1745). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall(Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 4970). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

Dobzhansky, T. (1944). On species and races of living and fossil man.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2, 251265.Donald, M.(1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evo-

lution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress.

Douven, I., & van Brakel, J. (1995). Is scientific realism an empiricalhypothesis? Dialectica, 49, 314.

Downes, S. M. (1993). Naturalized philosophy of science. Philosophy ofScience, 60, 452468.

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and con-

ceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid(Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structuresand processes (pp. 461493). Washington D.C.: American Psycho-logical Association.

Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach tocognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5,334339.

Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J.(2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. InK. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook

of thinking and reasoning (pp. 705725). New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2007). Oxford handbook ofevolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dupre, J. (1999). Are whales fish? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.),Folkbiology (pp. 461476). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. RetrievedApril 3, 2011, from http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2.

Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A.
http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2


14/49

280 Bibliography

(2003). A supramodal number representation in human intrapari-

etal cortex. Neuron, 37, 120.Ekert, A. (2008). Complex and unpredictable Cardano. InternationalJournal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 21012119.

Elga, A.(2007). Reflection and disagreement. Nous, 41, 478502.

Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. B.(in press). Subtracting ought from is: De-scriptivism versus normativism in the study of the human thinking.Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C.(1993). The role of deliber-ate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological

review, 100, 363406.Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics.

Albany: State University of New York Press.

Evans, E. M. (2000). Beyond Scopes. Why creationism is here to stay.In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, & P. Harris (Eds.), Imaging the im-possible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children (pp.305331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Everett, D. L.(2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition inPiraha. Current Anthropology, 46, 621634.

Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid cate-gorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9,303308.

Fales, E.(1996). Plantingas case against naturalistic epistemology. Phi-losophy of Science, 63, 432451.

Farah, M. J., & Rabinowitz, C. (2003). Genetic and environmental in-fluences on the organization of semantic memory in the brain: Isliving things an innate category? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,401408.

Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye con-tact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 96029605.

Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., &Csibra, G. (2005). Newborns preference for face-relevant stimuli:Eects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1724517250.

Fehr, E., & Gachter, S.(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature,415, 137140.


15/49

Bibliography 281

Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). The representations

underlying infants choice of more: Object files versus analog mag-nitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150156.

Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems ofnumber. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307314.

Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of thescientific mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Anthony(Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194214). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Feron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A. (2006). Evidence of amodal representa-tion of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-oldinfants. Cognitive Development, 21, 8192.

Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers.Psychological Science, 14, 278282.

Flombaum, J. I., Junge, J. A., & Hauser, M. D.(2005). Rhesus monkeys(Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations overlarge numbers. Cognition, 97, 315325.

Flombaum, J. I., & Santos, L. R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute

perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447452.Focquaert, F., Braeckman, J., & Platek, S. M. (2008). An evolution-

ary cognitive neuroscience perspective on human self-awareness andtheory of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 4768.

Fodor, J. A.(1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.

Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foun-dations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. A.(1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesnt work that way. Cambridge, MA:

MIT Press.Foley, R.(1987). Another unique species: Patterns in human evolutionary

ecology. Harlow: Longman.

Foley, R.(2001). In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative per-spectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. EvolutionaryAnthropology, 10, 514.

Forrest, B.(2000). Methodological naturalism and philosophical natural-ism: Clarifying the connection. Philo, 3, 729.

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Num-ber as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Piraha language and


16/49

282 Bibliography

cognition. Cognition, 108, 819824.

Frank, M. C., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E.(2008). Language as a cognitivetechnology: English-speakers match like Piraha when you dont letthem count. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.),Proceedings of the XXX annual conference of the Cognitive ScienceSociety (pp. 439444). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.

Frankenhuis, W. E., & Ploeger, A.(2007). Evolutionary psychology versusFodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypoth-esis. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 687710.

Fricker, E. (2002). Trusting others in the sciences: A priori or empirical

warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 373383.

Friedman, M. (1997). Philosophical naturalism. Proceedings and Ad-dresses of the American Philosophical Association, 71, 721.

Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting mindsA biological basis.Science, 286, 16921695.

Gabunia, L., Vekua, A., Lordkipanidze, D., Swisher III, C. C., Ferring, R.,Justus, A., Nioradze, M., Tvalchrelidze, M., Anton, S. C., Bosinski,G., Joris, O., de Lumley, M.-A., Majsuradze, G., & Moukhelishvili,

A.(2000). Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains of Georgia:Taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science, 288, 10191025.

Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R.(1995). The replacement of general-purpose theories withadaptive specializations. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neu-rosciences (pp. 12551267). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition:From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 5965.

Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G.(2003). Brain structures dier between musiciansand non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 92409245.

Geary, D. C.(1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in childrens cog-nition. Implications for mathematical development and instruction.American Psychologist, 50, 2437.

Geary, D. C. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology.Learning and Individual Dierences, 12, 317345.

Geary, D. C. (2007a). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual founda-tions for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson& J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind. Psychological


17/49

Bibliography 283

perspectives on contemporary educational issues (Vol. 2, pp. 199).

Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Geary, D. C. (2007b). An evolutionary perspective on learning disabilityin mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471519.

Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). De-velopment of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and Americanchildren: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Develop-ment, 67, 20222044.

Geist, C., Lowe, B., & Van Kerkhove, B.(2010). Peer review and knowl-edge by testimony in mathematics. In B. Lowe & T. Muller (Eds.),

PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects andmathematical practice (pp. 155178). London: College Publica-tions.

Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 8, 404409.

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J.(1990). The importance of knowing a dodo isa bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Develop-mental Psychology, 26, 796804.

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early

understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213244.Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for

analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155170.

Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow,B. B., Wol, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning andconceptual change: A case-study of Johannes Kepler. Journal ofthe Learning Sciences, 6, 340.

Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C.(2006).Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature, 440,

12041207.Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in

preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia: Disorientation forright and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology andPsychiatry, 44, 398408.

Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23,121123.

Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogicaltransfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 138.


18/49

284 Bibliography

Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cog-

nitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759774.Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G.(1996). Reasoning the fast and frugalway: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103,650669.

Gigerenzer, G., & Horage, U.(1999). Overcoming diculties in Bayesianreasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers andMcGraw (1999). Psychological Review, 2, 425430.

Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., & Paabo, S. (2004).Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full

trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biology, 2, 120125.Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S.(2007). Symbolic arith-

metic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589591.

Gil-White, F. J.(2001). Are ethnic groups biological species to the hu-man brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories.Current Anthropology, 42, 515536.

Glass, B. (1979). Milestones and rates of growth in the development ofbiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 3153.

Godfrey-Smith, P.(1991). Signal, decision, action. Journal of Philosophy,

88, 709722.Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing

gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20,267272.

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help uslearn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234241.

Goldman, A. I. (1990). Natural selection, justification, and inference tothe best explanation. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Evolution, cognition andrealism. Studies in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 3946). Lanham:

University Press of America.Goldman, A. I. (1999). A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology.

In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology(pp. 128). Oxford: Blackwell.

Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology,and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Goodman, N. D. (1981). The experiential foundations of mathematicalknowledge. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2, 5565.

Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63,


19/49

Bibliography 285

485514.

Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., &Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causalmaps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 332.

Gopnik, A., & Meltzo, A. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L.(2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in youngchildren. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371377.

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence fromAmazonia. Science, 306, 496499.

Gottfried, G., Gelman, S. A., & Schultz, J. (1999). Childrens under-standing of the brain: From early essentialism to biological theory.Cognitive Development, 14, 147174.

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge,MA & London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Grabiner, J. V. (1986). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? In T. Ty-moczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp.201213). Boston: Birkhauser.

Greenblatt, S. H. (1995). Phrenology in the science and culture of the

19th century. Neurosurgery, 37, 790805.Greer, B.(2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restruc-

turing. Learning and Instruction, 14, 541548.

Gregory, A. (2001). Harvey, Aristotle and the weather cycle. Studiesin History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Sciences, 32,153168.

Greienhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2006). Mathematical relativism:Logic, grammar and arithmetic in cultural comparison. Journal

for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 97117.

Greienhagen, C., & Sherman, W.(2008). Kuhn and conceptual change:On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children.Science & Education, 17, 126.

Gu, J., & Gu, X. (2003). Induced gene expression in human brain afterthe split from chimpanzee. Trends in Genetics, 19, 6365.

Guthrie, S. E.(1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. NewYork & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recentanalytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haile-Selassie, Y., Suwa, G., & White, T. D. (2004). Late Miocene teeth


20/49

286 Bibliography

from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and early hominid dental evolution.

Science, 303, 15031505.Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is richinterpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21,167179.

Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual dif-ferences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achieve-ment. Nature, 455, 665668.

Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know whatconspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139151.

Harper, E.(1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational Studies in Mathe-matics, 18, 7590.

Harris, J. (1982). Facts and fallacies of Aboriginal number systems. InS. Hargrave (Ed.), Language and culture (pp. 153181). Darwin:Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Harris, P. L. (2002). Checking our sources: The origins of trust in testi-mony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 315333.

Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, J. J., & Pons, F.(2006).Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young childrens ontol-

ogy. Developmental Science, 9, 7696.Hart, R. (2010). The Chinese roots of linear algebra. Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press.

Harvey, W. (1628 [1847]). An anatomical disquisition on the motion ofthe heart and blood in animals. In R. Willis (Trans.), The works ofWillam Harvey, M.D. Physician to the king, professor of anatomyand surgery to the college of physicians. Translated from the Latinwith a life of the author (pp. 186). London: Sydenham Society.

Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous causal

inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 515522.Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W.(2002). The faculty of language:

What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 15691579.

Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L.(2010). The grand design. London: Bantam.

Hebb, D. O.(1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur,U., & Sinha, P. (2011). The newly sighted fail to match seen withfelt. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 551553.

Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive


21/49

Bibliography 287

cultural processes can produce maladaptive lossesThe Tasmanian

case. American Antiquity, 69, 197211.Henrich, J., & Boyd, R.(2002). On modeling cognition and culture. Whycultural evolution does not require replication of representations.Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87112.

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McEl-reath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Smith Henrich, N.,Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q.,& Tracer, D.(2005). Economic man in cross-cultural perspective:Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and

Brain Sciences, 28, 795815.Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people

in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 6183.

Herbert, S. (2005). The Darwinian revolution revisited. Journal of theHistory of Biology, 38, 5166.

Hespos, S. J. (2007). Language acquisition: When does the learningbegin? Current Biology, 17, 628630.

Hoddeson, L.(2007). Analogy and cognitive style in the history of inven-tion: Inventor independence and closeness of compared domains. In

S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe European cognitive science conference (pp. 413417). Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imita-tion/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and chil-dren (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164181.

Hull, D. L.(1964). The eect of essentialism on taxonomyTwo thousandyears of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15,314326.

Hume, D. (1739 [2001]). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton &M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, D.(1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. London: Hafner.

Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D.(2003). Diversification and cumulative evolu-tion in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proceedings of theRoyal Society of London B, 270, 867874.

Hurley, S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Lan-guage, 18, 231257.

Hutchins, E.(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hutto, D. D.(2011). Presumptuous naturalism: A cautionary tale. Amer-


22/49

288 Bibliography

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 129145.

Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidences as to mans place in nature. London:Williams and Norgate.

Ifrah, G.(1985). Les chires, ou lhistoire dune grande invention. Paris:Laont.

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G.(2004). Vitalistic causality in young childrensnaive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 356362.

Ingman, M., Kaessmann, H., Paabo, S., & Gyllensten, U. (2000). Mi-tochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans.Nature, 408, 708713.

Irving, E.(2005). The role of latitude in mobilism debates. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102, 18211828.

Itakura, S.(2004). Gaze-following and joint visual attention in nonhumananimals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 216226.

Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Distinct cerebralpathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoSBiology, 6, e11.

Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S.(2011). Flexible intuitions

of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 108, 97829787.

Jackson, D. E., Holcombe, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W.(2004). Trail geom-etry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature, 432, 907909.

Jacob, F.(1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 11611166.

Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., & Barto, A. G.(1991). Task decompositionthrough competition in a modular connectionist architecture: Thewhat and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science, 15, 219250.

Janik, V. M., Sayigh, L. S., & Wells, R. S. (2006). Signature whistle shapeconveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,103, 82938297.

Jansson, D. G., Condoor, S. S., & Brock, H. R. (1993). Cognition indesign: Viewing the hidden side of the design process. Environmentand Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 257271.

Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). The multisensory representa-tion of number in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 103, 34863489.


23/49

Bibliography 289

Jordan, K. E., Brannon, E. M., Logothetis, N. K., & Ghazanfar, A. A.

(2005). Monkeys match the number of voices they hear to the num-ber of faces they see. Current Biology, 15, 15.

Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots ofmathematics (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Nous, 45, 103125.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A.(1982). Judgment under uncer-tainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions.Psychological Review, 103, 582591.

Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M.(2008). Chimpanzees know whatothers know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224234.

Kant, I.(1781 [2005]). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood,Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M.(1997). The fusiform facearea: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for faceperception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 43024311.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. SmallBusiness Reports, 18, 6871.

Kaufmann, E.(2010). Shall the religious inherit the Earth? Demographyand politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

Keil, F. C.(1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Keil, F. C.(2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex real-ity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368373.

Kelemen, D.(2003). British and American childrens preferences for teleo-

functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88, 201221.

Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children intuitive theists? Reasoning aboutpurpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295301.

Kelemen, D., Callanan, M. A., Casler, K., & Perez-Granados, D. R.(2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 251264.

Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction:Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138143.

Kelemen, D., Widdowson, D., Posner, T., Brown, A., & Casler, K. (2003).


24/49

290 Bibliography

Teleo-functional constraints on preschool childrens reasoning about

living things. Developmental Science, 6, 329345.Kertesz, A. (2004). Cognitive semantics and scientific knowledge: Casestudies in the cognitive science of science. Amsterdam: John Ben-

jamins.

Khan, I. A., Daya, S. K., & Gowda, R. M.(2005). Evolution of the theoryof circulation. International Journal of Cardiology, 98, 519521.

Kilian, A., Yaman, S., von Fersen, L., & Gunturkun, O. (2003). A bot-tlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli diering in numerosity.Learning and Behavior, 31, 133142.

Kim, J.(1988). What is naturalized epistemology?. Philosophical Per-spectives, 2, 381405.

King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975). Evolution at two levels in humansand chimpanzees. Science, 188, 107116.

Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our handswhen we think. In J. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe XVII annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.212217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kirsh, D.(1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive

Behavior, 4, 415452.Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from prag-

matic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513549.

Kitcher, P.(1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy,87, 522.

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101,53114.

Kitcher, P.(2008). Science, religion, and democracy. Episteme: A Journalof Social Epistemology, 5, 518.

Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Babyarithmetic: One object plus one tone. Cognition, 91, B23B34.

Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J.(1998). Numerical transformationsin five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 89104.

Kornblith, H.(1994). Naturalism: Both metaphysical and epistemological.In P. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midweststudies in philosophy, volume XIX, Philosophical naturalism (pp.3952). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Koten Jr., J. W., Wood, G., Hagoort, P., Goebel, R., Propping, P.,


25/49

Bibliography 291

Willmes, K., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Genetic contribution to

variation in cognitive function: An fMRI study in twins. Science,323, 17371740.

Kovacs, A. M., Teglas, E., & Endress, A. D.(2010). The social sense: Sus-ceptibility to others beliefs in human infants and adults. Science,330, 18301834.

Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M.(2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuris-tics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge aboutmotion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439453.

Krieger, M. H.(1991). Theorems as meaningful cultural artifacts: Making

the world additive. Synthese, 144, 135154.Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2004). Do 5-month-old infants

see humans as material objects? Cognition, 94, 95103.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:Chicago University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovationin scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension:Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 225239).Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kummer, H. (1995). Causal knowledge in animals. In D. Sperber,D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisci-plinary debate (pp. 2636). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ladyman, J.(2007). Does physics answer metaphysical questions? RoyalInstitute of Philosophy Supplement, 61, 179202.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes.Philosophical papers (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Lako, G., & Nunez, R. E.(2000). Where mathematics comes from. How

the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: BasicBooks.

Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R.(2006). Niche construction, human behav-ior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology,15, 95104.

Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des con-siderations relatives a lhistoire naturelle des animaux. RetrievedAugust 20, 2009, from http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice book detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=

ouvrages lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0.
http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_book_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table=ouvrages_lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0


26/49

292 Bibliography

Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of

Science, 48, 1949.Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L.(2006). Groups per-form better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers prob-lems: Eects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 90, 644651.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural language. InP. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind.Structure and contents (pp. 216235). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2007). Linguistic determinism and theinnate basis of number. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich(Eds.), The innate mind. Foundations and the future (pp. 139170).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C.,Leakey, L. N., & McDougall, I. (2001). New hominin genus fromeastern Africa shows diverse Middle Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410,433440.

Leakey, R. E. F., & Walker, A. C.(1976). Australopithecus , Homo erectus,

and the single species hypothesis. Nature, 261, 572574.Le ClecH, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, C., Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Poline,

J. B., Lehricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. (2000).Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts inde-pendent of language and input modality. NeuroImage, 12, 381391.

Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more:An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal countingprinciples. Cognition, 105, 395438.

Leibniz, G. W. (1765 [2001]). New essays on human understanding

(P. Remnant & J. F. Bennett, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximatequantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsy-chologia, 41, 19421958.

Leslie, A. M.(1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of Theoryof Mind. Psychological Review, 94, 412426.

Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basisof natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 213218.


27/49

Bibliography 293

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a

biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moralsentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society ofLondon B, 270, 819826.

Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14,396401.

Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.

Lipton, P. (2004). What good is an explanation? In J. Cornwell (Ed.),Explanations. Styles of explanation in science (pp. 121). Oxford:

Oxford University Press.Liu, X., & MacIsaac, D. (2005). An investigation of factors aecting

the degree of nave impetus theory application. Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, 14, 101116.

Lloyd, G. E. R.(2007). Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity anddiversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lockard, R. B.(1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology:Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26, 168179.

Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. Retrieved

September 20, 2007, from http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.html.

Loftus, E. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58,867873.

Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Antiquity, 84, 635648.

Lombrozo, T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation.Cognitive Psychology, 55, 232257.

Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007). Inferring design:Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patientswith Alzheimers disease. Psychological Science, 18, 9991006.

Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M.(2008). The importance ofunderstanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolu-tion: Education and Outreach, 1, 290298.

Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division ofcognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 10731084.

Machery, E.(2006). Two dogmas of neo-empiricism. Philosophy Compass,1, 398412.
http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.htmlhttp://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.htmlhttp://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.htmlhttp://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.html


28/49

294 Bibliography

Maddy, P.(1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mahon, B. Z., Anzellotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza,A. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain doesnot require visual experience. Neuron, 63, 397405.

Malthus, T. R.(1826). An essay on the principle of population or a viewof its past and present eects on human happiness; with an inquiryinto our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of theevils which it occasions (6th ed.). London: John Murray.

Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology& Philosophy, 21, 155188.

Marcus, G. F.(2004). The birth of the mind. How a tiny number of genescreates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.

Margolis, E., & Laurence, S.(2007). The ontology of conceptsAbstractobjects or mental representations? Nous, 41, 561593.

Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Apes, people,and their genes. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of CaliforniaPress.

Marr, D. C.(1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the humanrepresentational system and processing of visual information. San

Francisco: Freeman.Marshall-Pescini, S., & Whiten, A.(2008). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

and the question of cumulative culture: An experimental approach.Animal Cognition, 11, 449456.

Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understand-ing social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20,575587.

Martn-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Gonzalo, R., de Heras, L., & Fernandez-Fras, C.(2006). Brain potentials to mathematical syntax problems.

Psychophysiology, 43, 579591.Martzlo, J. C.(1995). Review of Lam Lay Yong and Ang Tian Se (1992)

Fleeting footsteps: Tracing the conception of arithmetic and algebrain ancient China. Historia Mathematica, 22, 6787.

Masataka, N., Ohnishi, T., Imabayashi, E., Hirakata, M., & Matsuda,H. (2007). Neural correlates for learning to read roman numerals.Brain and Language, 100, 276282.

Massey, C. M., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschoolers ability to decidewhether a photographed unfamiliar object can move itself. Devel-opmental psychology, 24, 307317.


29/49

Bibliography 295

Matsuzawa, T.(2007). Comparative cognitive development. Developmen-

tal Science, 10, 97103.Matthew, P. (1831). On naval timber and arboriculture; with criticalnotes on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting.Edinburgh: Adam Black.

Mattusch, C. C.(2003). Corinthian bronze: Famous, but elusive. Corinth,20, 219232.

Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold SpringHarbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15, 109117.

Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.Mayr, E.(1987). The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and

philosophical terminology. Biology & Philosophy, 2, 145166.

McCauley, R. N.(2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalnessof science. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation andcognition (pp. 6185). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McCauley, R. N. (in press). Why religion is natural and science is not.New York: Oxford University Press.

McCauley, R. N., & Henrich, J.(2006). Susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer

illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrabil-ity of the visual input system. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 79101.

McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 249, 122130.

McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motionin the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion ofobjects. Science, 210, 11391141.

McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics:The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 636649.McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1994). Roaring and numerical

assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo.Animal Behaviour, 47, 379387.

McCrink, K., & Wynn, K.(2004). Large-number addition and subtractionby 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776781.

McDowell, J.(1996). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-sity Press.

McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 493510.


30/49

296 Bibliography

McRoberts, R. W. (1990). Counting at Pularumpi: A survey of a tradi-

tional mathematics and its implications for modern learning. Abo-riginal Child at School, 18, 1943.

Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M.(1983). A mode control model of countingand timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: AnimalBehavior Processes, 9, 320334.

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A.(1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vos-niadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.

179195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Meltzo, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-

term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. DevelopmentalPsychology, 24, 470476.

Meltzo, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manualgestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 7578.

Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. PhilosophicalPsychology, 19, 329344.

Menary, R.(2007). Cognitive integration: Attacking the bounds of cogni-

tion. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., Harris, J., Kuhn, S., Tyler, R., &

Boesch, C. (2007). 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the originsof percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 30433048.

Mercier, H. (2010). The social origins of folk epistemology. Review ofPhilosophy and Psychology, 1, 499514.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Argumentsfor an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34,

5774.Mikkelsen, T. S., Hillier, L. W., Eichler, E. E., Zody, M. C., Jae, D. B.,

Yang, S., Enard, W., Hellmann, I., Lindblad-Toh, K., Altheide,T. K., Archidiacono, N., Bork, P., Butler, J., Chang, J. L., Cheng,Z., Chinwalla, A. T., & deJong, P. (2005). Initial sequence of thechimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Na-ture, 473, 6987.

Miller, G.(2000). The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolu-tion of human nature. London: William Heineman.

Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of


31/49

Bibliography 297

evolution. Science, 313, 765766.

Miller, R., Owens, S. J., & Rrslett, B.(2011). Plants and colour: Flowersand pollination. Optics and Laser Technology, 43, 282294.

Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories.Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Millikan, R.(1998). A common structure for concepts of individuals, stusand real kinds: More mama, more milk and more mouse. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 21, 5565.

Millman, A. B., & Smith, C. L. (1997). Darwins use of analogical rea-soning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 159187.

Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C.(2005). The development of cynicism. Psycho-logical Science, 16, 385390.

Mithen, S. (1988). Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art andinformation gathering. World Archaeology, 19, 297327.

Mithen, S.(1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins ofart, religion and science. Boston & New York: Houghton Miin.

Mithen, S. (2000). Mind, brain and material culture: An archaeologicalperspective. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolutionand the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp.

207217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Molko, N., Cachia, A., Riviere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-

han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2004). Brain anatomy in Turnersyndrome: Evidence for impaired social and spatialnumerical net-works. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 840850.

Molko, N., Cachia, A., Riviere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bi-han, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2003). Functional and structuralalterations of the intraparietal sulcus in a developmental dyscalculiaof genetic origin. Neuron, 40, 847858.

Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The leastlikely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of thefuture. Psychological Science, 16, 626630.

Morris, S. C., Taplin, J. E., & Gelman, S. (2000). Vitalism in naivebiological thinking. Developmental Psychology, 36, 582595.

Moutier, S., & Houde, O. (2003). Judgement under uncertainty and con- junction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking and Reasoning, 9,185201.

Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K.(1967). Time required for judgements ofnumerical inequality. Nature, 215, 15191520.


32/49

298 Bibliography

Muntersbjorn, M. M.(2003). Representational innovation and mathemat-

ical ontology. Synthese, 134, 159180.Murray, M.(2008). Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of reli-gion undermines the justification of religious belief. In J. Bulbulia,R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), Theevolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 393398).Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.

Naets, J. (2010). How to define a number? A general epistemologicalaccount of Simon Stevins art of defining. Topoi, 29, 7786.

Nagel, J. (in press). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case

method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Re-search.

Nagel, T.(1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83,435450.

Negishi, H., Ueda, K., Kuriyama, M., Kato, M., Kawaguchi, H., & At-sumori, H.(2005). Change of mental representation with the exper-tise of mental abacus. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli(Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII annual conference of the CognitiveScience Society (pp. 16061611). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nersessian, N. J.(1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. InL. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-basedreasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 522). Malden & Oxford:Blackwell.

Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics andCognition, 7, 147176.

Netz, R.(2002). Counter culture: Towards a history of Greek numeracy.History of Science, 40, 321352.

New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention

for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,104, 1659816603.

Nichols, R. (2006). Why is the history of philosophy worth our study?Metaphilosophy, 37, 3452.

Nichols, S. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role ofemotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69, 234255.

Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K.(2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Com-pressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontalcortex. Neuron, 37, 149157.


33/49

Bibliography 299

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. How Asians and west-

erners think dierently . . . and why. New York: Free Press.Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memoryand mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitivenarratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531553.

Novell, J. R. (1990). From Da Vinci to Harvey: The development ofmechanical analogy from 1500 to 1650. Journal of the Royal Societyof Medicine, 83, 396398.

Oaks, J. A. (2007). Medieval Arabic algebra as an artificial language.Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 543575.

OBrien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L.(2000). Darwinian evolutionism is appli-cable to historical archaeology. International Journal of HistoricalArchaeology,, 4, 71112.

Okasha, S. (2003). Fodor on cognition, modularity, and adaptationism.Philosophy of Science, 70, 6888.

Okasha, S.(2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Okasha, S. (2010). Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature, 467,653655.

Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006). Conservationand evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chim-panzee brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America, 103, 1797317978.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R.(2005). Do 15-month-old infants under-stand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255258.

Osawa, A., & Maeshima, S. (2009). Gerstmanns syndrome in a patientwith left thalamic hemorrhage. Neurology Asia, 14, 161164.

Owen, R.(1849). On the nature of limbs. A discourse. London: John Van

Voorst.Papineau, D.(1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Papineau, D. (2000). The evolution of knowledge. In P. Carruthers &A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity,language and meta-cognition(pp. 170206). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: Across-species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 8796.

Pelletier, F. J., Elio, R., & Hanson, P. (2008). Is logic all in our heads?From naturalism to psychologism. Studia Logica, 88, 366.


34/49

300 Bibliography

Petersson, K. M., Silva, C., Castro-Caldas, A., Ingvar, M., & Reis, A.

(2007). Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left-right dif-ferences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuro-science, 26, 791799.

Pfungst, O.(1911 [2001]). Clever Hans (The horse of Mr. von Osten): Acontribution to experimental animal and human psychology (C. L.Rahn, Trans.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.

Phillips, W., Shankar, M., & Santos, L.(2010). Essentialism in the absenceof language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). De-velopmental Science, 13, F1F7.

Piaget, J. (1929 [2007]). The childs conception of the world. Plymouth:Rowman & Littlefield.

Piaget, J.(1952). The childs conception of number. New York: Norton.

Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approx-imate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306,499503.

Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M.(2011). Why machine-information metaphorsare bad for science and science education. Science & Education, 20,453471.

Pinker, S.(1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane.Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20,

124.

Pinker, S.(2007). The stuof thought: Language as a window into humannature. New York: Viking.

Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.

Plato. (ca. 380 B.C.E. [2000]). Meno. In S. M. Cahn (Ed.), Exploringphilosophy. An introductory anthology (pp. 117151). New York:Oxford University Press.

Pletser, V., & Huylebrouck, D. (1999). The Ishango artefact: The missingbase 12 link. Forma, 14, 339346.

Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Are dinosaurs the rule or theexception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. CognitiveDevelopment, 19, 363383.

Pollard, B.(2005). Naturalizing the space of reasons. International Jour-nal of Philosophical Studies, 13, 6982.


35/49

Bibliography 301

Popper, K.(1994). In search of a better world. Lectures and essays from

thirty years. London: Routledge.Potts, R. (1998). Variation selection in hominid evolution. EvolutionaryAnthropology, 7, 8196.

Povinelli, D. J. (2000a). Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzees theoryof how the world works. Oxford and New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Povinelli, D. J.(2000b). The minds of humans and apes are dierent out-comes of an evolutionary experiment. In S. Fitzpatrick & J. Bruer(Eds.), Carving our destiny: Scientific research faces a new millen-

nium (pp. 140). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciencesand John Henry Press.

Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciouslyhuman? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 157160.

Preissler, M. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Two-year-olds appreciate the dualnature of pictures. Psychological Science, 18, 1-2.

Preuss, T. M., Caceres, M., Oldham, M. C., & Geschwind, D. H.(2004).Human brain evolution: Insights from microarrays. Nature ReviewsGenetics, 5, 850860.

Price, G. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Annalsof Human Genetics, 35, 485490.

Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptualbasis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pyysiainen, I.(2003). True fiction: Philosophy and psychology of religiousbelief. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 109125.

Pyysiainen, I., Lindeman, M., & Honkela, T.(2003). Counterintuitivenessas the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33, 341355.

Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E. M., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode,

A., & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activationpatterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,101, 56865691.

Quallo, M. M., Price, C. J., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Cheng, K., Lemon,R. N., & Iriki, A.(2009). Gray and white matter changes associatedwith tool-use learning in macaque monkeys. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106,1837918384.

Quine, W. V. O.(1969a). Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine


36/49

302 Bibliography

(Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 6990). New

York: Columbia University Press.Quine, W. V. O. (1969b). Natural kinds. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.),Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114138). New York:Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1975). The nature of natural knowledge. In S. Gut-tenplan (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson College lectures (pp.6781). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Ramsey, G. (2006). Block fitness. Studies in History and Philosophy ofBiological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 484498.

Real, L. A.(1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitivearchitecture. Science, 253, 980986.

Recanati, F. (1997). Can we believe what we do not understand? Mind& Language, 12, 84100.

Regier, T., Kay, P., Gilbert, A. L., & Ivry, R. B. (2010). Language andthought: Which side are you on, anyway? In B. Malt & P. Wol(Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience

(pp. 165182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Reid, T. (1764). An inquiry into the human mind, on the principles of

common sense. Edinburgh: Millar, Kincaid and Bell.

Resnik, M. D.(1982). Mathematics as the science of patterns: Epistemol-ogy. Nous, 16, 95105.

Restivo, S. (1992). Mathematics in society and history. Sociological in-quiries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How cul-ture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago

Press.Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., & Bloomfield, A.(2006). Giving the boot to the

bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers. Cognition, 101,B51B60.

Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J.(2008). From numerical conceptsto concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623642.

Robillard, P.-Y., Dekker, G. A., & Hulsey, T. C. (2002). Evolutionaryadaptations to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in humans: Low fecund-ability rate, loss of oestrus, prohibitions of incest and systematicpolyandry. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 47, 104


37/49

Bibliography 303

111.

Rogers, A. R.(1988). Does biology constrain culture? American Anthro-pologist, 90, 819831.

Rogers, D. S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2008). Natural selection and culturalrates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America, 105, 34163420.

Rollenhagen, J. E., & Olson, C. R. (2000). Mirror-image confusion insingle neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science, 287,15061508.

Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W.(2002). Birth, obstetrics and human evo-

lution. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 11991206.

Roth, P. (2007). Naturalism without fears. In S. P. Turner & M. W.Risjord (Eds.), Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 683708). Amsterdam & Oxford: North-Holland.

Rowlands, M. (1997). Teleological semantics. Mind, 106, 279303.

Roy, R.(2003). Babylonian Pythagoras theorem, the early history of zeroand a polemic on the study of the history of science. Resonance, 8,3040.

Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F.(2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science:An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521562.

Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G.(2008). Discrimination of smallnumerosities in young chicks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 388399.

Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with num-bers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and num-ber processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 16091624.

Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.(1996). Mental mod-

els of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian childrens cosmologies.Cognitive Development, 11, 491521.

Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Childrens thoughts onthe origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. CognitiveScience, 21, 147177.

Samuels, R. (2000). Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychol-ogy and cognitive architecture. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamber-lain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, languageand meta-cognition (pp. 1346). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

8/3/2019 The

Documents

The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64,13_bibl