21
This is a peer reviewed contribution. Received: 26 May 2006 Revised: 26 July 2006 Accepted: 10 August 2006 © Micronesian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences ISSN 1449-7336 HeritageFuturesInternational, PO Box 3440, Albury NSW 2640, Australia 79 Persistent identifier: http://www.nla.gov.au/nla.arc-65664 MICRONESIAN JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Vol. 5, nº 1/2 Combined Issue November 2006 THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF CONTEMPORARY MARSHALLESE BURIAL PRACTICES Dirk HR Spennemann Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University While prehistoric and early historic burials in Micronesia are on occasion uncovered either as a result of construction activities or due to shoreline erosion, there is no information how modern burial practices might be recognisable in the present and future archaeological record. This paper describes the observations made during exhumations and provides for some projections how modern burials might be interpretable in the future. This paper sets out the observations on mod- ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on Mejatto Island, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Mar- shall Islands. The author was commissioned to conduct a total of six exhumations on Mejatto Island as part of a U.S. Congress mandated study into the radiological problems surround- ing the resettlement of Rongelap Atoll, Repub- lic of the Marshall Islands (see Franke 1992; Franke et al. 1995; Spennemann 1993a for fur- ther details on the exhumation project). The findings of the exhumations as well as the stra- tigraphy of the individual burials have been documented elsewhere in great detail (Spen- nemann 1993a) as have been other cultural ob- servations made while carrying out the fieldwork (Spennemann 1993b). The implica- tions of the observed decomposition rates on the archaeological interpretation of prehistoric and historic burials interred on tropical sand islands have been discussed eslewhere (Spen- nemann and Franke 1994; 1995a-c). The present paper shall be confined to a discussion of the contemporary Marshallese mortuary practices as they present themselves in the archaeological record. To the knowledge of the author no such assessment has been car- ried out in the Pacific, let alone in the Marshall Islands. PREVIOUS RESEARCH Only very limited previous research has been carried out on the mortuary practices of the Marshallese. Early references to Marshallese burial customs are scattered in the ethno- graphic literature and contemporary travel ac- counts (cf. Erdland 1914; Finsch 1893; Hager 1886; Krämer & Nevermann 1936; Warren 1860). Further, the Marshallese dictionary con- tains a number of terms related to traditional burial practices (Abo et al. 1976). Following an- thropological and archaeological research and cultural resource management activities, a number of cemeteries were described (cf. (Riley 1987; Rosendahl 1987). On occasion of a cul- tural resource management plan for Majuro Atoll, the nature and distribution of the prehis- toric and historic cemeteries was assessed (Spennemann 1990a).

THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

  • Upload
    lamdan

  • View
    222

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

This is a peer reviewed contribution. Received: 26 May 2006 Revised: 26 July 2006 Accepted: 10 August 2006 © Micronesian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences ISSN 1449-7336 HeritageFutures™ International, PO Box 3440, Albury NSW 2640, Australia 79 Persistent identifier: http://www.nla.gov.au/nla.arc-65664

MICRONESIAN

JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

Vol. 5, nº 1/2 Combined Issue November 2006

THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF CONTEMPORARY MARSHALLESE BURIAL PRACTICES

Dirk HR Spennemann Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University

While prehistoric and early historic burials in Micronesia are on occasion uncovered either as a result of construction activities or due to shoreline erosion, there is no information how modern burial practices might be recognisable in the present and future archaeological record. This paper describes the observations made during exhumations and provides for some projections how modern burials might be interpretable in the future. This paper sets out the observations on mod-ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on Mejatto Island, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Mar-shall Islands. The author was commissioned to conduct a total of six exhumations on Mejatto Island as part of a U.S. Congress mandated study into the radiological problems surround-ing the resettlement of Rongelap Atoll, Repub-lic of the Marshall Islands (see Franke 1992; Franke et al. 1995; Spennemann 1993a for fur-ther details on the exhumation project). The findings of the exhumations as well as the stra-tigraphy of the individual burials have been documented elsewhere in great detail (Spen-nemann 1993a) as have been other cultural ob-servations made while carrying out the fieldwork (Spennemann 1993b). The implica-tions of the observed decomposition rates on the archaeological interpretation of prehistoric and historic burials interred on tropical sand islands have been discussed eslewhere (Spen-nemann and Franke 1994; 1995a-c).

The present paper shall be confined to a discussion of the contemporary Marshallese

mortuary practices as they present themselves in the archaeological record. To the knowledge of the author no such assessment has been car-ried out in the Pacific, let alone in the Marshall Islands.

PREVIOUS RESEARCH Only very limited previous research has been carried out on the mortuary practices of the Marshallese. Early references to Marshallese burial customs are scattered in the ethno-graphic literature and contemporary travel ac-counts (cf. Erdland 1914; Finsch 1893; Hager 1886; Krämer & Nevermann 1936; Warren 1860). Further, the Marshallese dictionary con-tains a number of terms related to traditional burial practices (Abo et al. 1976). Following an-thropological and archaeological research and cultural resource management activities, a number of cemeteries were described (cf. (Riley 1987; Rosendahl 1987). On occasion of a cul-tural resource management plan for Majuro Atoll, the nature and distribution of the prehis-toric and historic cemeteries was assessed (Spennemann 1990a).

Page 2: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

80 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

The majority of the work, however, was limited to the observation and description of human remains, with little, if any, detail on the burial practices. The description of burial sites was included in several resource assessment reports (cf. Spennemann 1990d; 1992b, 1994). Some bones were encountered on the surface (Shun & Athens 1990 Spennemann 1990f; Spennemann & Lajuan 1990), others within World War II structures (Adams et al. 1989; Spennemann 1989b). In addition to these, there were finds of human bones on the shore-line, presumably evidence of eroding burial grounds, on Majuro, (Spennemann 1990e) or from Taroa Island, Maloelap Atoll (Spenne-mann 1989a; 1990c; 1992c). The latter could be traced to an eroding cemetery, which had also been vandalised by subsequent action (Spen-nemann 1993c). The incidence of erosion and its implications on cemeteries on Majuro was studied (Spennemann 1990a) along with the dispersal of bones eroding from other ceme-teries (Spennemann 1991; 1992). Finally, some data were gathered on occasion of exhum-ations on Mejatto Island (Spennemann 1993a; 1993b). It is these latter data that are reported here.

Burial customs Traditionally, only chiefs (irooj) were buried, while commoners were thrown into the sea or set adrift on rafts. The chiefs’ burials were placed within the land allotments (watos) be-tween the houses and the breadfruit forest. The burials were covered with an oval-shaped pile of coral rocks. Two paddles were stuck in at the head and the foot end to serve as grave markers.

Krämer & Nevermann (1938) make fre-quent reference to traditional burial goods found in graves. The burial goods found were small Conus armrings in children's graves (ibid. 102) and a small bone fish hook. Excavations at Laura as part of salvage work found burials with conus armrings, shell beads, vasticardium charms, cypraea belt ornaments, and bone needles (Spennemann 1994). Following Chris-tianisation, burial occurred at a number of small communal or, preferentially, congrega-tional cemeteries of less than ~40 graves each.

Only in the post World War II phase some lar-ger and more concentrated cemeteries occur-red, such as on Majuro. A survey of the ocean side from Djarrit to Delap has shown that many of these cemeteries are very close to the shore and are eroding at a rapid rate (Spenne-mann 1990a).

Prehistoric burials are very rare. Some burial areas are known, where individual graves are surrounded by coral slabs alignments. Yet, their exact chronological status is unclear and it is well possible that most of them belong to the prehistoric period. Concrete was intro-duced to the Marshall Islands during the Ger-man period (1885-1914) but was not widely available. Historic photographs show concrete graves of irooj for 1904 and other graves for 1905 (Spennemann 1990a).

During the Japanese Period, and especially during the early part of Japan’s preparations for the Pacific War concrete became more readily available. Several graves of the US occupation phase of Majuro show examples where Coca-Cola Bottles were used in the fill with necks protruding, apparently to serve as receptacles for flowers and other ornaments. Some graves even show a combination of Coca-Cola bottles and Sake bottles, the latter being identifiable by their diagnostic blue-tinted glass.

CONTEMPORARY BURIAL GROUNDS The cemetery, the only one on the island, is lo-cated on the northeastern shore of Mejatto Island, some 80 paces (~80 m) west of the shoreline. The cemetery itself is located on a palaeo–shoreline which is about 1.2 to 1.5 m (4-5 feet) above the present beach area. The cemetery is situated in an open, grassy area bordered by coconut groves on the north and south, and by a scatter of trees, manly Scaevola, sericea (Marshallese: kõnnãt), Guettardia speciosa (Marshallese: utilomar), Tournefortia (Messer-schmidia) argentea (Marshallese: kiden), and Pan-danus tectorius (Marshallese: bob).

The perimeter of the immediate cemetery area is defined by a scatter or coral gravel, the surface of which was covered to a thickness of 0.2 m with bleached coral gravel collected on the beach of Mejatto and neighbouring islands. Some recent colonisation of the cemetery area

Page 3: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 81

with kõnnãt had occurred. Surrounding the cemetery some holes of land crabs could be found. None of the holes, however, occurred in the immediate neighbourhood of the burials. The layout of the cemetery shows a clear sepa-ration of adult graves along the old shoreline and of children’s graves further inland (Fig. 1).

Horizontal Stratigraphy The horizontal stratigraphy of the Mejatto cemetery has been set out in Fig. 1. As can be seen, the cemetery began in the northeast with the burial of an adult. A second row of burials, dedicated to the children was begun further in-land. The adult cemetery was expanded con-tinuously southward until 1992, when a burial was placed at the northern end of the se-quence.

The children’s cemetery followed initially the same pattern, with the second burial placed southward of the first. The third interment, however, was then placed between the two previous children’s graves.

Both the incidence of the recursion to the north as in case of the 1992 interment, and the interment of the third children’s grave cautions against the use of horizontal stratigraphy for the analysis of contemporary Marshallese cemeteries where the dates on the head stones may no longer be readable. While overall the trend seems to be true, variations may occur.

Coral Gravel Scatters The average grain size of the coral gravel mak-ing up the scatter surrounding the graves is be-tween 3 to 10 mm, while the size of the gravel distributed within the grave monument was markedly larger and measured between 10 and 25 mm. The scatter surrounded the grave markers, as well as an area to the south of the adult row of graves. It appears that at one time the cemetery was extended that way to cater for future graves.

The gravel of the scatters surrounding the house sites measures between 3 and 15 mm in grain size. Most houses on Mejatto have coral gravel scatters, even though there are a few, which have not yet been surrounded with them. The failure to do so is borne from the fact that the Rongelapese consider the settle-ment on Mejatto as temporary and that no ex-cessive effort should be placed on the development of that island.

Contemporary Grave Markers The grave markers are made of concrete with reinforcement of steel/rebar both horizontal and vertical in the marker. On one occasion, a children’s grave with a smaller marker, the re-inforcement rod was made of a wooden dowel, presumably a broom handle. The aggregate content of the concrete was very high and con-sequently the strength of the concrete low. Consequently, some of the markers cracked either during the removal or during replace-ment on occasion of the exhumations.

Page 4: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

82 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Fig. 1. Horizontal stratigraphy of the cemetery on Mejatto The monument is commonly of rectangular

shape measuring 1.2 by 2.4 m in horizontal di-mensions and 0.2 m in thickness. The flat monument has a central opening filled with coral gravel. The central section of the flat sur-face has been lined with an elevated narrow (100 mm wide) concrete rim. Both the flat sur-face and the rim have four short lengths of plastic pipe (diameter 25 mm [1 inch]) embed-ded, which act as receptacles for the stems of plastic and natural flowers. The pipes protrude between 40 and 100 mm above the concrete.

The headstone, cemented into the monu-ment, is in the shape of a cross set upon a square with bevelled corners, which in turn sits on a rectangle with bevelled corners (Fig. 2–Fig. 4). It extends below the underside of the flat grave marker and seems to have been erected before the concrete slab is poured. The marker has been painted white. A three-line inscription has been applied with blue paint on the western side of the marker and can thus not be read if one stand at the foot end of the grave.

All grave markers are very similar in ap-pearance, while the grave markers of the adult graves are almost identical. From the data of informants it would appear that the grave stones were copied from each other by taking measurements of the predecessors when a new grave stone became necessary. The headstone was erected first. It protrudes for about 0.3 to 0.4 m into the ground. Then the flat slab of the marker was poured around it.

Placement of the marker It is commonly assumed that the grave marker is erected exactly above the grave pit. The ex-humations conducted as part of the radiologi-cal study allowed checking up on these

assumptions. Both in exhumations nº 1 and nº 4 it was found that the location of the burial marker was not exactly above the burial pit. In case of nº 1 the marker had been shifted 0.5 m to the west, and in case of exhumation nº 4 the marker had been shifted 0.2 m to the south. Further, the marker of exhumation nº 4 had also been slightly turned to the northwest in relation to the grave pit underneath.

1 metre1 metre

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Plan view (left) and elevation (right)

of the concrete grave marker

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Fig. 2. Perspective (top), plan view (bottom left) and elevation (bottom right) of the grave marker of exhum-

ation Nº 1.

Page 5: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 83

Fig. 3. Modern grave marker, Mejatto Island, as seen from the head end

Fig. 4. Modern grave marker, Mejatto Island, as seen from the foot end

Page 6: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

84 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Table 1. Parameters (in cm) of the interments at Mejatto Burial Pit Coffin Nº Year Length Width Depth Length Width Height at Depth 1 1986 180 85 170 170 60 30 140 2 1987 220 100 150 170 60 30 118 3 1988 200 80 150 185 60 30 120 4 1989 220 90 130 200 60 30 100 5 1986 180 120 170 140 43 30 140 6 1987 170 80 150 145 60 30 120

1 2 3 4 5 6

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Exhumation Nº

Gra

ve V

olu

me (

in c

ubic

metr

es)

Fig. 5. Volume of soil excavated for each burial pit.

Note that burials 5 and 6 are children’s graves.

CONTEMPORARY BURIAL CUSTOMS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD The discussion of the appearance of the con-temporary Marshallese burial customs in the archaeological record comprises the analysis of the burial pits in their sizes and depth, as well as their stratigraphies, using that of exhumation nº 1 as an example. The orientation of the bod-ies is also discussed here.

Burial pits The dimensions of the individual burials pits, well as those of the corresponding caskets are set out in table 1. The measurements of the burial pit opening refer to the opening at their top. Overall, in all cases, the opening of the pit narrowed towards the bottom, in some cases gradual, and in some case dramatically (nº 3).

In some case, such as exhumation nº 1, the bottom of the burial pit seems to have had a tight fit for the casket.

The depth of the interment varies, but in the whole is limited between 1.3 and 1.7m be-low ground surface. There appears to be a trend, whereby the older burials (exhumations #1 and #5, both interred in 1986) are buried deeper than the more recent ones (table 1).

Cross-sections and stratigraphies An analysis of the infill patterns showed that the spoil heaps were not separated during the excavation, and that, in all cases, more than one person simultaneously filled in the pit. The following description refers to the plana and profile of exhumation nº 1. Similar observa-tions were made for all exhumations and are reported elsewhere (Spennemann 1993a).

Exhumation 1—a case example The excavation was placed exactly at the lo-

cation where the grave marker had been, with about 0.10 m latitude to either side. As it turned out after planum 1 had been cleaned off, the grave monument, when it was erected, had been moved some 0.5 to 0.6 m to the east in relation to the actual burial pit. As a result, the area opened for excavation had to be ex-tended for a small distance.

Three different x soils were encountered, a thin layer of topsoil (A-horizon, type #3)1 and unaltered littoral sand (C-horizon, type #1).2 The third soil (type #2)3 is a mixture of the two and slightly varies in colour and composition.

Planum 1 The burial pit is well visible and boundaries can be well made out. Part of the burial pit disap-pears in the eastern profile. The burial pit is demarcated by a narrow, 20-40 mm wide band of dark grey to dark greyish brown sand (soil #3). Centre of the pit is made up of an un-evenly coloured light brownish grey sand (soil #2), which constitutes a mixture of soils #1 and #3. The centre of the pit contains inclu-sions of soils #1 and #3 (see Fig. 10). The amount of root matter inside the burial pit was higher than outside.

Page 7: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 85

1 metre

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Planum 1

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

1 metre

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Planum 2

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

Fig. 6. Exhumation Nº 1. Plana 1 and 2.

Page 8: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

86 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

1 metre

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Planum 3

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

1 2

1 metre1 metre

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Planum 4

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

Fig. 7. Exhumation Nº 1. Plana 3 and 4.

Page 9: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 87

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1Central Profile

N S

0.20m

Surface

0.40m

0.60m

0.80m

1.00m

120m

1.40m

1.60m

1.80m

1 metre

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

Mejatto Exhumation Nº 1

Central Profile • Interpretation

N S

0.20m

Surface

0.40m

0.60m

0.80m

1.00m

120m

1.40m

1.60m

1.80m

1 metre

Unaltered Coral Sand

Topsoil/Subsoil mixture

Dark Topsoil

Light Topsoil

(For detailed soil descriptions see text)

Coffin

1

2

3

4

5A

C

Fig. 8. Exhumation Nº 1. Drawing (left) and interpretation (right) of the stratigraphy of the central profile (note that the section below the casket is tentatively reconstructed, as the casket was not removed from the burial pit).

Planum 2 The burial pit is well visible and its boundaries can be well made out. The southeastern corner of the pit is narrowing in. An increased amount of dark brown soil can be found in the west of the planum and along the southern sides. The centre and the northeastern part of the burial pit are made up of a large patch of soil #1 with very limited admixture of topsoil. The western part and the southern face consist of type #2 soil. The northeastern part of the planum shows two large dark brown type #3 soil inclu-sions.

Two small land crab holes, both already filled in, were seen at the western side and the southwestern corner of the excavation pit, both outside the grave pit area. (see Fig. 10).

The soil in the interior of the grave pit is very unconsolidated and uncompressed. It compresses, when stepped upon, to a depth of 2-3 cm (pressure ~1.43 km/cm2 or 7.9 psi).

The eastern end of the grave pit continues to collapse into the excavation pit because of the unconsolidated nature of the infill. By comparison, the natural soil stratigraphy stands up well. The amount of root matter in the pla-num is less than that of planum 1.

Page 10: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

88 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Planum 3 The casket has been reached and partially ex-posed. The right (northern) wall of the casket has collapsed and bent inwards. The lid has sloped to the north., the slope being the great-est in the centre of the casket. The casket is covered with a grey or brownish cloth, with some polyester fibres in it. The dark wood of the plywood shines through the cover.

The area of the pit not taken up by the cas-ket was covered in type #1 soil. Due to the un-adulterated nature of the sand the boundary of the pit could not be made out .

At the foot (southwestern) end of the cas-ket an aluminium bucket was encountered, which was covered (sown into) a bag of green and white-striped cloth. Only the handle pro-truded. The contents of the bucket were not inspected (Fig. 11).

A plastic, supermarket-type shopping bag containing some red fabric was found placed at the northwestern end of the casket. The red cloth gave off pigment, which stained (through holes in the bag) the directly surrounding sand pinkish (Munsell 10 R6/3-4, spots 7.5 R 5/8).

The bucket was sitting at an angle defined by the sloping top of the coffin’s lid towards the centre.

After documentation, both items were re-moved and placed outside the grave to permit the opening of the casket. According to oral information, the bucket as well as the bag con-tained personal clothing items of the deceased, as well as linen soiled in the effort to stem the hemorrhage.

Planum 4 This planum represents the opened casket. The body was resting prone on the back. The head was placed on a pillow, the hands were resting on the hips. Both legs were extended and paral-lel to each other.

The body of the deceased had been covered with a shroud which clung tightly to the bones. Many bones, as well as the head and the hair knot could be well made out even by superfi-cial investigation. The shroud clung so tight to the body, outlining the vertebral column.

The body of the deceased was covered with a shroud, which was covered by a thin layer (2-

4 mm thick) of very fine dark brown wet silt. An increased amount of fresh root growth could be observed in the central northern part of the coffin indicating that the collapse of the northern coffin wall may have been of a recent date.

A large number of roots was seen growing through the body.

Central profile The central profile, to be established at the perceived centre of the grave(=stomach or pel-vic area of the body), was drawn in sections, each section once the next planum had been reached. As it turned out after planum 1 had been cleaned off, the grave monument, when it was erected, had been moved some 0.5 to 0.6 m to the east in relation to the actual burial pit. The cross-section ended up being located at the neck area.

The burial pit is well demarcated in the pro-file. The central surface area of the pit shows a thin lens of coarse coral gravel, originating from the coral gravel fill of the central section of the grave marker. The upper part of the burial pit to a depth of about 0.40 m below ground surface shows a well defined horizontal banding. Two layers exhibit upwards sloping to both the northern southern profile wall. Refill horizons of alternating dark and light soil can be made out easily. Towards the top the con-tent of type #1 soil increases. The infill layers have a thickness between ~10 and ~60 mm (=type #3 soil measures).

The area below this zone, ranging from 0.40 to 1.10 m below ground surface shows a dis-tinct banding of the infill horizons, consistently sloping downwards towards the north.

The bottom part of the northern half shows a higher content of type #1 soil than the southern half of the profile. The top part of this fill at the northern wall shows a zone of clean unaltered sand (#1). The top of the cas-ket set at 1.2 m below ground surface is also covered with a 0.15 m thick layer of clean sand.

The stratigraphy of the unaltered soil profile shows a 0.10 m to 0.15 m thick A-horizon (soil #3) overlaying a C-horizon which shows some bands of coarser sand. The natural profiles

Page 11: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 89

were not drawn but the western and the north-ern profile were photographed.

A large number of roots and rootlets was found in the grave pit profile. The roots appar-ently originate from coconut palms nearby.

Animal disturbances Disturbances of burials can occur due to ani-mal activity. On the small islands in the tropical Pacific the majority of disturbances is caused by the burrowing activities of land crabs, which have been shown to be responsible for the ver-tical movement of artefacts in archaeological sites.

An inspection of the area around the ceme-tery showed that there were a few holes of land crabs (purple backed crabs; Marshallese: aton, but no holes could be found within the area covered by gravel. During the excavations a few holes dug by land crabs could be encount-ered (exhumations nº 1, nº 3), but none of them were seen responsible for the disturbance of the funeral remains.

Orientation of inhumations The body of the interred was oriented with the head pointing westward. Degrees observed were N235E (nº 4, 6) N245E (nº 1, 3) and N265E (nº 2, 5) (all magnetic north 1993). In all cases where it could be ascertained (nº 1–3, 5, 6) the face had been positioned upward and was looking towards the feet. In all cases the body was resting prone on the back. The head was always placed on a pillow. The hands were resting on the hips in exhumations nos 1, 2, 6 or in the lap as in case of exhumation nº 3. In one exhumation (nº 5) the hands were parallel to the body. Both legs were extended and par-allel to each other (nos. 1, 2, 5, 6) with the feet pointing outwards (nº 3, 4)

GRAVE ACCESSORIES The types of grave accessories discussed in this section comprise the caskets, which contained the body, the grave goods and clothing given into the casket, as well as the grave goods en-countered outside the casket.

Caskets Two basic types of caskets were encountered: five made locally of plywood and one made of pressed paper, which came from Honolulu, bearing the body of a person who had died there of fish poisoning. The measurement de-tails of the caskets are set out in table 1.

The casket of exhumation nº 1, measuring 0.8 by 1.7 by 0.3 m in dimensions, was made of commercially available 1/2 inch plywood, held together by small galvanised iron nails. The casket itself was covered with a cot-ton/polyester-mix fabric, of brown-grey, for-merly probably white colour. The nature of the cloth could not be determined at the time of the exhumations, but appears to have been a white bed sheet, which had become stained by humic acid carried by rainwater from the higher levels of the stratigraphy. The sides of the coffin had been lined with white cloth, presumably a bed sheet. While the lining co-vered the outer surface of the coffin’s lid, it did not extend over the inner surface. The sides and the lid of the casket were held together with nails set at irregular intervals .The interior of the casket was covered with cloth of white material. The head of the individual had been placed on a pillow.

The plywood had been exposed to a humid sand for eight years, so that the wood was in an advanced state of deterioration, although, on the whole, intact. The wood had become thor-oughly soaked by the humidity of the soil and the glue seems to have come apart, making the plywood very flexible. Initially the casket had been nailed shut. Now, however, the nails broke out very easily when the coffin was pried open with a hammer. The left (northern) side of the coffin had collapsed and bent inwards, causing the coffin lid to slump in that direction. The coffin afforded substantial air space even at this stage of deterioration.

The casket of exhumation nº 2, measuring 0.6 by 1.7 (by 0.3-0.4 m?) was made of used plywood, held together by small nails. The cas-ket itself was covered with a cotton/polyester-mix fabric, of brown-grey colour. At the time of the exhumations, the coffin lid has collapsed in the north-western corner. The sides and the lid of the casket were held together with galva-

Page 12: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

90 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

nised nails set at irregular intervals. Padding materials: The interior of the casket, but not of the lid, was covered with a dark blue cloth with narrow white stripes and rectangular motif interwoven at regular intervals. The head rested on a pillow, which had a pink print with small blue, red and green flowers on it.

Cloth Lining

Plywood

Plastic Sheet

Fig. 9. Schematic cross-section of the plastic-covered casket of exhumation nº 5.

The casket of exhumation nº 3 measuring 0.6 by 1.80 m was made of plywood, held to-gether by small nails. The casket itself was co-vered with a cotton and polyester-mix fabric, of brown-grey colour, probably a former bed sheet. The casket body intact and still strong, even though the wood had become saturated with moisture. The casket had been lowered into the burial by the means of a 3/8 to 1/2 inch rope, which had been dropped into the pit. The sides and the lid of the casket were held together with iron nails set at irregular in-tervals. The interior of the casket was covered on the bottom and the sides with an orange coloured print which had green and blue flower motifs on it. The colours of the print were still bright. The interior of the lid had not been lined and only the edges showed a mar-ginal overlapping of the cloth which covered the outside of the casket.

The casket of exhumation nº 6, measuring 0.6 by 1.40 m, was made of plywood, held to-gether by small nails. Unlike the others, this casket was not covered with a fabric. The sides and the lid of the casket were held together with nails set at irregular intervals. The bottom of the casket was covered with cloth. The head rested on a white pillow with green and red flowers motifs.

The casket of exhumation nº 5 was slightly different. Like the caskets for exhumations 1 to 3 and 6, the casket was made of plywood, held together by small nails. The casket itself was covered with a cotton/polyester-mix fabric, of brown-grey colour. On top of this fabric a layer of transparent sheet plastic, commonly used as a building material, was placed. The plastic also covered the lid of the casket with an overhang on all sides, thus effectively seal-ing off the interior of the casket.

Fig. 10. Exhumation Nº 4. Schematic plan and cross-section of the cardboard casket. The hatched areas indi-

cate the use of ply-wood The sides and the lid of the casket were

held together with galvanised nails set at irregu-lar intervals. The interior of the casket was co-vered with a white cloth. The body was placed on a padded layer covered with a white cloth with longitudinal blue and red stripes. The head rested on a pillow with green, blue and red ornaments.

The casket of exhumation nº 4 was made of a card-board or press paper-board like material, which crumbled upon impact. The thickness of

Page 13: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 91

the cardboard was about 1 inch. The casket lid had two small plywood sections on the top (~0.3 to 0.5 m), apparently to strengthen it and to provide solid flat surfaces upon which other items could be placed during the burial cere-mony. On the outside casket was covered with a dark grey cloth material. On the inside, the casket had been lined with a white cloth. In the cross-section the casket was hexagonal rather than rectangular as were the home-made cas-kets (see Fig. 15).

Grave goods Until the findings of the exhumations, inter-views with people of the Marshall Islands had resulted in the impression that today, that is in the 1980s and 1990s, no burial goods would be given into the grave. It was held that in the 1930s and 1940s, as well as in the early 1950s women might be given an—empty—perfume bottle, while both men and women, but more often men, might be given a small plate and/or a cup into the casket.

The findings of the small number of ex-humations conducted on Mejatto tends to sug-gest that burial goods continued in fact to be given into the grave, either on the casket or in-side the coffin: photographs, sleeping mats, both synthetic and traditional, buckets, plastic bags with personal belongings (mainly items of clothing), clothes and the like. In addition, un-intentional grave goods, such as lengths of rope, were found.

Inside the casket Following the principles of minimal intrusion and appropriateness of measures taken, no sys-tematic searches were undertaken inside the caskets.

In exhumation nº 4 a plastic shopping bag, with unknown contents, was noted inside the casket, located between the legs of the de-ceased. A black frilly border was laid out around the inside perimeter of the casket.

Two black frilly bands were also placed on the chest of exhumation nº 2, and a garland of pink synthetic flowers was placed on the waist.

The body of exhumation nº 3 was placed on a mat woven from Pandanus leaves (jaki). This mat partially covered the body as well and

overlapped with the shroud. When the casket was opened, the mat was intact, but crumbled on touch. It had completely deteriorated and turned into a silty substance, maintaining the weave pattern.

The body of exhumation nº 6 had been co-vered with a shroud leaving the head end free. On top of the shroud a number of grave goods had been placed. On top of the stomach area a multiple bow ornament was placed, made of a golden, waxed paper band, with a blue flower in the centre. A similar item of blue colour was placed on the right chest. A long necklace of golden plastic beads (diameter approximately 8 mm) was spread over the stomach, and a neck-lace of light green plastic beads (diameter ap-prox. 3-5 mm) was spread on the chest. A similar necklace, laid out parallel to the body, was placed between the legs (Fig. 17).

Outside the casket Exhumation nº 1 showed some grave goods outside the casket: An aluminium bucket had been placed on the left (as seen from the ob-server) foot end of the casket. The bucket, which had a diameter of 340 mm, was draped (sown into?) a green and white-striped cloth. Only the handle of the bucket protruded from the parcel.

A plastic shopping bag (supermarket-type bag) had been placed on the right (as seen from the observer) foot end of the casket. The cloth covering the bucket was of a polyester-mix fab-ric, and in very good and strong condition. The plastic bag, which was torn, contained a piece of red coloured clothing, which gave off some red dye, staining the sand in contact with the clothing.

According to oral information, the bucket as well as the bag contained personal clothing items of the deceased, as well as linen soiled in the effort to stem the haemorrhage. In line with the principles of minimal intrusion and appropriateness of measures taken neither the contents of the bag nor those of the bucket were inspected.

In exhumation nº 3, a pair of trousers, made of a synthetic material, was encountered on top of the southern foot end of the coffin. The trousers were coloured black, red and yellow.

Page 14: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

92 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Fig. 11. Planum view of planum 2 of exhumation nº 4 showing the position of the Polaroid® photos (2) and

the synthetic jaki mat (3). The lid of the coffin has col-lapsed save for one corner (1).

Table 2. Burial goods and personal items countered during the exhumations at Mejatto Cemetery. Men Women 2 3 4 1 5 6 Outside Clothes ■ ■ Bucket [1] ■ ■ Polaroid® photos ■ Sleeping mat ■ Rope [2] ■ Shopping bag ■ Casket Plywood ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Press board ■ Plastic lining ■ Cloth lining ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Ornament ■ Inside Mattress(?) ■ Sleeping mat ■ 2x Shopping bag ■ Plastic flowers ■ Black band ■ ■ Belt ■ Necklace 3x Bows (bands) 2x Pillow ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Pottery sherd ■ Shroud ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Socks ■ ■ Shoes ■ Trousers ■ ■ ■ Dress ■ ■ ■ Suit/Jacket ■ Shirt ? ? ■ Notes: [1] as container; [2] unintentional grave good?;

None of the dyes had given off any colour pigments to the surrounding soil. The fabric was firm. A length of rope was encountered, partially tied around the casket. The rope, made of hemp or Manila hemp had a diameter of about 3/8 to 1/2 inch. It was solid and very strong and needed to be cut with a knife for removal.

Exhumation nº 4 contained a fair number of burial goods. A modern-type, Japanese made jaki mat, woven from yellow-brown and green synthetic fibres was found folded and rolled up on top of the northern central section of the casket. Three Polaroid® photos were

Page 15: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 93

seen on top of the casket. Two of them could be separated and were looked at. The emulsion had turned yellow and the shadowy outline of a man, possibly that of the deceased, can be made out.

Personal belongings Some of the assessments of the time since death of human burials have tried to use the decay of associated materials, such as clothing, leather items, paper and so forth. Rodriguez & Bass (1985) carried out interment experiments of human bodies in the soil without coffins. They found that synthetic trousers showed macroscopically no sign of degradation after one year, while cotton trousers, buried at 0.6m for six months showed some sign of degrada-tion (and so did the leather shoes). Let us now look at the data gained on Mejatto:

The body of exhumation nº 1 had been co-vered with a shroud and, following the princi-ples of minimal intrusion and appropriateness of measures taken, no attempt was made to unnecessarily uncover the body. Only the leg end of the sheet was lifted to extract the bones. The woman was wearing a white (?) dress and a petticoat. The fabric of the dress was in a good state of preservation. Her feet were bare. An ornamented belt, made of a belt string with green and black plastic beads (diameter ~3-5 mm) attached in a spiral fashion was seen.

The body of exhumation nº 3 had been co-vered with a sheet and no attempt was made to unnecessarily uncover the body. Only the leg end of the sheet was lifted to extract the bones. The body had been dressed in a pair of trou-sers. These trousers had disintegrated to shreds. The socks, on the other hand, made of synthetic material, were still strong and intact. They contained the disarticulated foot remains. A pair of black coloured slip-on shoes, made of a synthetic upper material and a yellow rubber or plastic sole, was well preserved.

The casket lid of exhumation nº 4 had completely disintegrated and no attempt was made to unnecessarily uncover the entire body. Only the leg end of the casket was opened by the removal of a number of pieces to extract the bones. Exposed were the legs of the indi-vidual, clothed in a dark blue (?) pair of trou-

sers. Part of the jacket of the suit could also be seen. The feet were in socks.

The neck of the dress of exhumation nº 6 was buttoned tight, the plastic buttons being in good condition. Three necklaces were noted on top of the shroud (see above).. The hair was held in place by five bow-like plastic hair clasps, two of transparent brown colour, two opaque yellow and one of an opaque red. In addition what appears to be a piece of white pottery was noted next to the hair .

Artefacts in secondary position No artefacts in secondary position were en-countered during the excavation of the exhum-ations.

Spatial distribution of grave accessories The spatial distribution of the grave accessories encountered at the bodies is shown in Fig. 17.

CONCLUSIONS The exhumations at Mejatto Island allowed for an investigation of contemporary burial prac-tices in outer island community in the Marshall Islands. In addition to clothing worn by the deceased, the items given into the graves are comprised of personal ornaments either worn or placed on the body as well as sleeping mats and ancillary items.

Given the limited sample of exhumations caution should be exercised when generalising the observations. Observed patterns are few. All three men seem to have sleeping mats asso-ciated with them, either inside or outside the casket, while none of the women graves did so. The grave goods (ornaments) of the three fe-males are gender specific and would allow the identification of the buried as women.

Archaeologically the burial pits stand out well as the darker topsoil from the infill of the burial pits contrasts well with the light sand of the underlying island. The depth of the pit combined with the colour difference of the soils means that at this stage the infill process can be readily reconstructed. This may not be possible in the long term as the soil is sandy and given the darker colouration of the topsoil is caused by small humic particles which can be moved by water transport. It can be speculated

Page 16: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

94 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Fig. 12. Exhumations nº 1 to nº 3. Spatial distribution of grave accessories in relation to the anatomical remains.

Page 17: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 95

Fig. 13. Exhumations nº 4 to nº 6. Spatial distribution of grave accessories in relation to the anatomical remains.

Page 18: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

96 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

Table 3. Projected archaeological life span of the burial goods and personal items countered during the exhum-ations at Mejatto Cemetery. Black: survival very likely; grey: survival probable. years 5 10 20 30 40 50 75 Aluminum Bucket Polaroid photos Sleep. mat Plastic Sleep. mat organic Rope Shopping bag Mattress(?) Plastic flowers Black band Belt, Paper Necklace Bows (bands) Pillow Pottery sherd Shroud Socks Shoes Trousers Dress Suit/Jacket Shirt Buttons Metal Buttons Plastic Zipper Plastic Zipper Metal Casket Plywood Press board Plastic lining Cloth lining Ornament

that the delineation of the thin infill layers will be less clear as time goes by. Whether the lay-ers will obliterate completely remains conjec-ture. Some indication that this may occur is provided by the burial pits observed at the pre-historic cemetery on Majuro Island (‘Laura’) on Majuro Atoll. Even though we can assume that the pits would have been excavated in the same fashion as he burial pits on Mejatto, the fill of the e pits on Majuro I. is a homogeneous grey (Spennemann 1994).

When speculating about the future archaeo-logical signature of the interments, we can as-sume that the mixture of organic and synthetic

fabric and materials will result in differential preservation. While some modern polymers are deemed biodegradable by the addition of starch, older plastics are not. These plastics and polymers will decay over time through the breakdown of the emulsifiers. On land this is aided by the impact of ultraviolet light, making the plastics brittle and easy to shatter. Plastics covered from light, immersed in water or bur-ied are likely to break down much more slowly. While the experimental data in hand too lim-ited to make concrete projections with too many variable to be considered (Hamid & Amin 1995; White & Turnbull 1994) some generalised predictions can be made (Table 3) which possibly underestimate the survival chances of the constituent materials.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The exhumations, as well as the formulation of the resulting report received the support of a number of people, without whose assistance the project could not have been accomplished. Above all, the author is indebted to the resi-dents of Mejatto Island, who endured the in-trusion into their community by the excavation party, and the intrusion into their spiritual life which an exhumation brings about.

For the field period and its preparations, I am indebted to Bernd Franke (Institute of En-ergy and Environmental Research, Washing-ton, D.C. and Heidelberg, Germany); Newton Lajuan (Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands); Steve Simon (Nationwide Radiological Study, Ma-juro); James Mataoshi and Abacca Anjain (Rongelap Resettlement Project, Majuro Of-fice). Rev. Jacob Anjain (Mejatto) was so kind as to officiate over a brief ceremony before the exhumations began, and to reconsecrate each of the graves after exhumation.

ENDNOTES

1 Soil #3 Subangular mainly medium, partially coarse, sand of dark grey to dark greyish brown colour (Munsell 2.5Y 4/1-2). Single grain, fri-able, non-sticky and non-plastic. This soil has a very small humus content and a higher content of root matter.

2 Soil #1: Subangular coarse, very loose sand of very pale brown to pinkish white/pinkish grey

Page 19: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 97

colour (Munsell 7.5-10YR 7-8/2-3). Single grain, non-sticky and non-plastic. This soil has no hu-mus content and no root matter.

3 Soil #2: Subangular medium to coarse, very loose sand of light brownish grey colour (Mun-sell 2.5Y6/2). Single grain, non-sticky and non-plastic. This soil has some root matter.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Abo, T., B.W.Bender, A.Capelle & T.DeBrum

(1976) Marshallese-English Dictionary. PALI language Texts: Micronesia. Honolulu: Univer-sity of Hawaii Press.

Adams, W.H., R.E.Ross & E.L.Krause (1990) Ar-chaeological Survey of Taroa Island, Maloelap Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Report submitted to Micronesian Endowment for His-torical Preservation, March 10, 1990.

DEIS (1989) Draft Environmental Impact State-ment Proposed Actions at U.S.Army Kwajalein Atoll. June 1989. Huntsville, Alabama: Depart-ment of the Army, U.S. Strategic Defense Command.

Erdland, A. (1914) Die Marshall-Insulaner. Anthro-pos Ethnologische Bibliothek. Münster i.W. Bd. 2, Heft 1.

Finsch, O. (1893) Ethnographische Erfahrungen und Belegstücke aus der Südsee. Annalen des K. & K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums 7. Vienna: K. & K. Naturhistorisches Hofmuseum.

Franke, Bernd (1992) Rongelap Resettlement Pro-ject. Survey of Traditional or “Local Food only” Diet and Measurements of Plutonium in bone of deceased Rongelap residents. Draft Work plan August 13, 1992. Heidelberg/Germany: In-stitute for Energy and Environmental Research.

Franke, Bernd, R.Schupfner, H.Schüttelkopf and Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1995) Transuranics in bone of deceased former residents of Rongelap Atoll, Marshall Islands. In: “Plutonium in the Environment” Applied Radiation and Isotopes 46(11), pp.1253-1258.

Hager, C. (1886) Die Marshall Inseln in Erd- und Völkerkunde, Handel und Mission. Leipzig: G.Lingke.

Hamid, S. H. and Amin, M. B. (1995) Lifetime pre-diction of polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Sci-ence 55 (10), pp. 1385-1394.

Kamal, M. R. (1970) Cause and effect in the weathering of plastics. Polymer Engineering & Sci-ence 10(2), pp 108-121.

Krämer, A., & H.Nevermann (1938) Ralik-Ratak (Marschall Inseln). In: G.Thilenius (ed.), Er-gebnisse der Südsee-Expedition 1908-1910. II. Ethnographie, B: Mikronesien. Vol. 11: Ham-burg: Friedrichsen & de Gruyter.

Munsell (1972) Munsell Soil Color Charts. Michi-gan: Kollmorgan Corporation.

Riley, T.J. (1987) Archaeological survey and testing, Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands.In: T.Dye (ed.), Marshall Islands Archaeology. Pacific Anthro-pological Records 38. Honolulu: Department of Anthropology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

Ryenkevich, M.A. (1981) Traders, Teachers and Soldiers: An anthropological study of Colonial Era sites on Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands. Micronesian Archaeological Survey Report 8. Saipan: Historic Preservation Office, Trust Ter-ritory of the Pacific Islands.

Shun, K. and Athens, JS (1990) Archaeological In-vestigations on Kwajalein Atoll,. Marshall Is-lands, Micronesia. Micronesia, Supplement 2:231-240

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1989a) Report on a hu-man femur from the south-western coast of Tõrwa Island, Maloelap Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Osteological Report DRS 52 (1989). 4 pp. Ms. on file, Alele Museum, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1989b) Report on the skeletal remains from the manshelter of Bar-racks Building A, Taroa Island, Maloelap Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Osteological Report DRS 51 (1989) 7 pp. Ms. on file, Alele Museum, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990a) Eroding cemetries in the D-U-D area. Report on a brief survey to determine the extent of coastal erosion on the ocean side of Jarõj, Wülka and Telap Islands, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Geomorphological Report DRS-GEO 5 (1990). Report prepared for the Historic Preservation Office, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990b) Predictive model of the expansion of cemeteries on Majuro Atoll until the year 2010. Report prepared for the His-toric Preservation Office, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands.1990.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990c) Report on a hu-man ulna from the south-eastern coast of Torwa Island, Maloelap Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. 1990. 4 pp. Report presented to the Historic Preservation Office, Majuro, Republic

Page 20: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

98 Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices

of the Marshall Islands. Report OTIA-TAG-MAR-42-7/90.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990d) Report on an ar-chaeological reconnaissance survey of the En-yagin Islands, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Report prepared for the His-toric Preservation Office, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands. 1990. Report OTIA-TAG-MAR-42-6/90. 24 pages.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990e) Report on part of a human cranium from Bwuron Island, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Osteo-logical Report DRS 56 (1990). Report presented to the Historic Preservation Office, Majuro, Re-public of the Marshall Islands. Report OTIA-TAG-MAR-42-12/90.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1990f) Osteological analy-sis of human remains from site MI-Mj-242 found at Laura Beach, Majuro Island (Laura), Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Osteological Report DRS 54 (1990) Report pre-sented to the Historic Preservation Office, Ma-juro, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Report OTIA-TAG-MAR-42-4/90.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1991) Selektion menschlicher Skelettreste in ausgewaschenen Grabstätten: eine Fallstudie von den Marshall-Inseln. Archäologische Informationen 14(1) (1991) 32-40.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1992a) Cultural Resource Managment Plan for Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. 2 Vols. Washington: U.S.Department of Interior, Office of Terri-torial and International Affairs.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1992b) The Japanese Nany’o Boeki Kaisha Trading Station on Bouj and other observations pertaining to Historic Preservation Issues on Bouj and Airok Islands, Ailinglaplap Atoll. HPO-Report 1992/12. Ma-juro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands: Historic Preservation Office.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1992c) Report on further human bones from the south-western coast of Taroa Island, Maloelap Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. HPO-Report 1992/6. Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands: Historic Preservation Office.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1992d) Differential repre-sentation of human skeletal remains in eroded and redeposited coastal deposits: A case study from the Marshall Islands. International Journal of Anthropology 7 (1), 1-8.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1993a) The Exhumation of Human Bodies on Mejatto Island, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands Narrative

and Documentation. Case report prepared for the Institute for Energy and Environmental Re-search, Washington/USA & Heidel-berg/Germany as part of the Plutonium in Bone Study, Rongelap Resettlement Project. Pacific Cultural Resources Management Case Reports. Albury, NSW, Australia: Pacific Cultural Re-sources Management.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1993b) Cultural Resources on Mejatto Island, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Observations during a se-ries of exhumations in January 1993. Case report prepared for the Republic of the Marshall Islands Historic Preservation Office. Pacific Cultural Resources Management Case Reports. Albury, NSW, Australia: Pacific Cultural Re-sources Management.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1993d) Observations of Vandalism at a Japanese Cemetery on Taroa Island, Maloelap Atoll HPO-Report 1993/1. Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands: Historic Preservation Office.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1994) Excavations of a prehistoric cemetery on Majuro Island, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. The Johnstone Centre for Parks, Recreation and Heritage Report Nº 13— The Johnstone Centre for Parks, Recreation and Heritage, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW., 1994

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Franke, Bernd (1994) On the dark stains observed in some Tongan burials. Archaeology in New Zealand. 37 (1), 35-43.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Franke, Bernd (1995a) Decomposition of buried human bodies and as-sociated death scene materials on coral atolls in the tropical Pacific. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40 (3), pp. 356-367.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Franke, Bernd (1995b) Decomposition of human bodies and the inter-pretation of burials in the tropical Pacific. Ar-chaeology in Oceania 39, 66-73.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Franke, Bernd (1995c) Archaeological techniques for exhumations: a unique data source for crime scene investigat-ions. Forensic Science International 74(1), pp. 5-15.

Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Lajuan, Newton (1990) Report on human bones found in the interior of Wotje Island, Wotje Atoll, Republic of the Mar-shall Islands. Osteological Report DRS 57 (1990). Report presented to the Historic Preser-vation Office, Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Report HPO-Report Nº 3-90. Majuro Atoll: Republic of the Marshall Islands Historic Preservation Office.

Page 21: THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MANIFESTATION OF …marshall.csu.edu.au/MJHSS/Issue2006/MJHSS2006_106.pdf · ern Marshallese burial practices made by the author on occasion of a brief stay on

Archaeological Manifestation of Contemporary Marshallese Burial Practices 99

Spoehr, Alexander (1949) Majuro, a village of the Marshall Islands. Fieldiana: Anthropology 39. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum.

Warren, J. (1860) The Morning Star: History of the Children’s Missionary vessel and of the Marque-san and Micronesian Missions. Boston: Ameri-can Tract Society.

White, J. R., and Turnbull, A. (1994) Weathering of polymers: mechanisms of degradation and sta-bilization, testing strategies and modelling, Jour-nal of Materials Science 29(3), pp. 584 – 613.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY AND CONTACT Dirk HR Spennemann is Associate Professor in Cultural Heritage Management at Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia. His main research in-terests are German colonial heritage in Oceania, in particular Micronesia, and historic preservation is-sues in Micronesia in general. His second focus are issues of heritage futures, including the threats to heritage posed by natural and human hazards and threats posed by managers in their efforts to counter these hazards. Ethical Heritage Planning and Policy are the cornerstones that need to be un-derstood and addressed if our past is to have a meaningful future. CONTACT: A/Professor Dirk H.R. Spennemann, Charles Sturt University, P.O.Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia e-mail [email protected]