Upload
geographical-analysis-urban-modeling-spatial-statistics
View
345
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Application of Spatial Filtering Technique to the Economic Convergence of the European Regions between 1995 and 2007 Francesco Pecci, Nicola Pontarollo Department of Economics,Univesity of Verona
Citation preview
The Application of Spatial Filtering Techniqueto the Economic Convergence of the
European Regions between 1995 and 2007
Francesco Pecci, Nicola Pontarollo
Department of Economics,
Univesity of Verona
Fifth International Workshop on
"Geographical Analysis, Urban Modeling, Spatial Statistics"
GEOG-AN-MOD 10
Aim of the work
Evaluate the convergence rates of European regions
by the application of the spatial filtering technique that is able to manage:
economies are structurally different
economies are not isolated islands
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
•Economic etherogeneity
•Spatial dependence
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 2
Economic convergence: the beta-covergence model
• it correlates the initial stage of developement T-twith the mean growth rate for a chosen period T;
• α is the intercept;
• β is the so-called convergence rate;
• Z represents the explanatory variable and ϕ thepameter;
• ε is the error term.
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 3
ZyT
yyTt
Ttt logloglog
The augmented model: the variables
• GVAEMP07 = log of the regional GVA per worker in region iin 2007;
• GVAEMP95 = log of regional GVA per worker in region i in1995;
• SCEMP03 = log of (δ + g + ni) where (δ + g) = 0.03,ni = average growth in employment between 1995 and 2007in each region;
• SAVEGVA = log of the average investment as a per cent ofGVA, a proxy for the saving rate in the region i between 1995and 2007;
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 4
• TECHEMPe = log of the average workers in high-tech sectorsas per cent of total employees in the region i between 1995and 2007 (Eurostat Regio);
• LONGUNEMPe = log of the average of long-termunemployment (more than 12 months) as per cent of thetotal unemployed in the region i between 1999 and 2007(Eurostat Regio), an indicator of the rigidity of the labourmarket;
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
(…continue) the variables
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 5
• EMPAGRIe = log of the average employees in agriculture asper cent of total employees in the region i between 1995and 2007 (Eurostat Regio);
• LNLIFLEARe = log of the participants in programs of long lifelearning as per cent of total employees in region i between1999 and 2007 (Eurostat Regio).
(…continue) the variables
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 6
The β-convergence augmented model
We expect that the coefficients of:
• GVAEMP95 would be negative (it means convergence);
• SCEMP03, LONGUNEMPe, EMPAGRIe would be negativebecause they give a negative contribution to the economicgrowth;
• SAVEGVA, TECHEMPe, LNLIFLEARe would be positivelycorrelatetd with the dependent variable.
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 7
iii
iii
iii
LNLIFLEAEMPAGRIeLONGUNEMPe
TECHEMPeSAVEGVASCEMP
GVAEMPGVAEMPGVAEMPT
Re
03
959507
654
321
13
n
1i
2
i
n
1i
n
1j
jiji
n
1i
n
1j
ij )y(y
)y(yc)y(y
c
nMC
• It uses of Moran’s measure of spatial autocorrelation (MC).
The better results are given by:• a Gabriel Graph contiguity matrix (1 if a contiguous neighbor,
0 if not);• globally standardized (C scheme).
The spatial filters
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 8
Variable Moran’s Coefficient
GVAEMP95 0.8916
SCEMP03 0.1115
SAVEGVA 0.5684
TECHEMPe 0.4124
LONGUNEMP 0.6774
EMPAGRI 0.7248
LNLIFLEAR 0.7477
Spatial autocorrelation of the variables
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 9
Steps:1. Determine MCM matrix that corresponds with the
numerator of MC:
n-IC
n-I
TT 1111
The spatial filters
Where:
• I is a n-by-n identity matrix and 1 is a n-by-1 vector of ones;
• (I – 11T/n) = M ensures that the eigenvector means are 0;
• symmetry ensures that the eigenvectors are orthogonal;
• M ensures that the eigenvectors are uncorrelated;
• thus, the eigenvectors represent all possible distinct (i.e.,orthogonal and uncorrelated) spatial autocorrelation mappatterns for a given surface partitioning.
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 10
2. Decompose MCM matrix into series of uncorrelated matrixof variables.- First eigenvector (E1) of matrix is the set of values that
has the largest MC achievable.- Second eigenvector (E2) is the set of values that has the
largest MC achievable for values not correlated with E1.And so on.
The spatial filters
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
The eigenvectors can be used as predictive variables in aregression and the ones associated with:• the largest MC have global geographic scale,• the ones whith the medium MC values a regional scale,• and the ones with lower MC values a local scale.
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 11
The spatial filters
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 12
The spatial filters
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 13
The spatial filters
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 14
The spatial model
Spatial filtering enables easier implementation of GWR, as well asproper assessment of its dfs.
intercept coefficientsof the variables
Variables
Elementper element
product
Iteraction terms
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
p
p
p
K
k
kk
K
k
kk
p
p
GWRppGWR
XEE
XY
p
p
pp
1 1
0
1
0
1
,,0
110
0
00
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 15
3. Compute all of the interactions terms XjEk for the P covariatestimes the 71 candidate eigenvectors with MC > 0.25;
4. select from the total set, including the individualeigenvectors, with stepwise regression;
5. the geographically varying intercept term is given by:
6. the geographically varying covariate coefficient is given byfactoring Xj out of its appropriate selected interaction terms:
K
1k
Eki,i ki,bEaa
The spatial model
j
K
1k
EXki,jjji, XbEbXbki,j
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 16
The spatial model
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 17
beta = − 0.01469− 0.06595*E6 + 0.03642*E18 − 0.06540*E26
+ 0.04771*E36 + 0.02629*E60 − 0.02146*E62 + 0.01071*E68
Coefficient of the variable Coefficient of the 6_th eigenvector
6_th eigenvector
Example: the computation of local beta
VariableSpatial Filtered Model OLS Model
Coefficient Std. Error Coefficient Std. Error
Intercept 0.0767*** 0.0057 0.0998*** 0.0099
GVAEMP9 -0.0147*** 0.0009 -0.0107*** 0.0012
SCEMP03 -0.0003 0.0004 -0.001 0.0007
SAVEGVA 0.0069*** 0.0019 0.0181*** 0.0024
TECHEMP 0.0019 . 0.0010 0.0064*** 0.0019
LONGUNEMP -0.0015* 0.0006 -0.0004 0.0009
EMPAGRI -0.0201* 0.0084 0.0147 0.0107
LNLIFLEAR 0.0089 0.0091 0.0304** 0.0111
R sqr. (adj.) 0.9613 (0.9352) 0.5194 (0.506)
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence
Sign.: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Results
18
Global (average) parameters values
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence
Results
Variable Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
Intercept -0.0651 0.0409 0.0696 0.0767 0.1061 0.3345
GVAEMP95 -0.0423 -0.0192 -0.0142 -0.0147 -0.0092 0.0008
SCEMP03 -0.0118 -0.0029 -0.0004 -0.0003 0.0021 0.0146
SAVEGVA -0.0226 -0.0009 0.0072 0.0069 0.0147 0.0403
TECHEMP -0.0294 -0.0028 0.0013 0.0019 0.0077 0.0247
LONGUNEMP -0.0106 -0.0043 -0.0019 -0.0015 0.0011 0.0096
EMPAGRI -0.2401 -0.0680 -0.0211 -0.0201 0.0227 0.3705
LNLIFLEAR -0.2153 -0.0392 0.0129 0.0089 0.0598 0.1861
19
Local parameters values
Variable
Scale of the eigenvectors associated to every variable
Global(MC>0.75)
Regional(0.75>MC>0.50)
Local(0.50>MC>0.25)
Intercept E6, E18, E19 E26, E35, E36, E44 E60
GVAEMP95 E6, E18, E26 E36 E60, E62, E68
SCEMP03E5, E6, E9, E10,E18,
E19, E22E26, E36, E38 E44, E48
SAVEGVA E6, E12, E16, E18, E22 E30, E38, E43
TECHEMP E9, E10, E16, E19E26, E30, E36, E38,
E43E51, E69
LONGUNEMP E5, E12, E17E47, E51, E60,
E62,E69
EMPAGRI E1, E9, E11, E24 E27, E31, E38 E46, E50, E70
LNLIFLEAR E13, E17 E33E45, E48, E49,
E51,E65, E66, E69
ResultsSignificant eigenvectors of the model
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
Spatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence F. Pecci & N. Pontarollo 20
Results
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 21
Convergence rates of GVA per worker
Results
Regional convergence rates of GVA per worker in EU-15
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
Spatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence F. Pecci & N. Pontarollo 22
Results
Regional convergence rates of GVA per worker in EU-NMS
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
Spatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence F. Pecci & N. Pontarollo 23
ResultsCorrelation between convergence rates and initial GVA per worker
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
Spatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence F. Pecci & N. Pontarollo 24
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence
Conclusions
25
• in EU-27 the regional economies are structurally different,and, as a consequence, there are many different path ofgrowth;
• regional convergence rates (and the coefficient of the othervariables) differ within the same country;
• it exists some clusters of regions with similar structures;
• NMS and EU-15 countries does not have common economicstructure within them dummy variables or artificialspatial partitions are not able to manage this phenomenus;
• spatial filters give us the information about the scale ofinfluence of every variable useful information for policymakers.
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence
Further research fields
26
• To deep the analysis of European regional economies in viewof these results;
• to build spatial clusters for identifying economies withcommon structural characteristics;
• to evaluate the effects of specific policies in relation to theirscale of intervention.
- Aim - Growth model - Spatial filters - Spatial model - Results - Conclusions
F. Pecci & N. PontarolloSpatial Filtering & European Economic Convergence 27