The Adapting to Rising Tides Project San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • The Adapting to Rising Tides Project San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission
  • Slide 2
  • Photo: Ingrid Taylor The goal of the ART project is to increase the preparedness and resilience of Bay Area communities to sea level rise and other climate change impacts while protecting ecosystem and community services. ART Goal
  • Slide 3
  • Adapting to Rising Tides How will sea level rise and storm events affect the future of Bay Area communities, infrastructure, ecosystems and economy? What approaches can we pursue, both locally and regionally, to assess these challenges, and reduce or manage these risks?
  • Slide 4
  • ART Objectives Create an integrative (cross-sector and cross-jurisdiction) adaptation planning framework that can be applied in other areas of the Bay region Develop, test, and refine adaptation tools and processes to help the region address climate change Understand how adaptation planning can be scaled to different geographic extents local, regional, state, federal
  • Slide 5
  • ART Planning Process
  • Slide 6
  • ART Assessment Frames Society and Equity Economy Environment Governance
  • Slide 7
  • Identify Partners Review Climate Impacts Select Planning Area and Assets Step 1 - Scope & Organize
  • Slide 8
  • ART Partners ABAG Alameda County Public Works Community Development Public Health Department Transportation Commission BART Bay Institute Bay Trail CA Coastal Conservancy Capitol Corridor JPA City of Alameda City of Emeryville City of Hayward City of Oakland City of San Leandro City of Union City East Bay Dischargers Authority East Bay Municipal Utility District East Bay Regional Park District H.A.R.D. Pacific Institute PG&E Port of Oakland San Francisco Estuary Institute San Francisco Estuary Partnership
  • Slide 9
  • ART Working Collaborations Active and engaged Working Group plus a Communication and a Technical Subcommittee Working Group Members Provide: Data Judgment Feedback Tools of Collaboration: Small meetings Working group meetings On-line survey Phone interviews Document review
  • Slide 10
  • ART Climate Impacts More frequent floods Floods that last longer Permanent inundation Shoreline erosion and overtopping Elevated groundwater and salinity
  • Slide 11
  • ART Project Area 66.7 square miles in Alameda county, including six cities, one unincorporated community, and numerous special districts A diversity of land uses, key regional infrastructure, natural resources and shoreline communities Local interest and capacity
  • Slide 12
  • ART Asset Categories Airport Community land use, facilities, services Contaminated lands Energy, pipelines and telecom Hazardous material sites Ground transportation Parks and recreation Natural shorelines Seaport Stormwater Structural shorelines Wastewater
  • Slide 13
  • Impacts, Vulnerability & Risk Step 2 - Assess
  • Slide 14
  • Assessment Process
  • Slide 15
  • Impacts Assessment Assess Impacts Local Climate Projections Six future climate scenarios Five potential climate impacts Asset Inventory Twelve asset categories Metrics describing asset specific characteristics Existing Conditions and Stressors Report
  • Slide 16
  • Summarizing the ART Impact Assessment: The Existing Conditions and Stressors Report Project introduction and background Climate change impacts under consideration Description of assets in each category Existing Conditions
  • Slide 17
  • Assess Vulnerability Vulnerability is the susceptibility of people, property, and resources to the negative impacts of climate change
  • Slide 18
  • If exposed, would an asset be physically or functionally impaired? If compromised could it maintain primary function? Could primary function be restored quickly, easily or in a low-cost manner? Assessing Vulnerability
  • Slide 19
  • What is the magnitude of the expected consequences on: Society and Equity Economy Environment Governance Assessing Risk
  • Slide 20
  • Data-driven desktop analysis Stakeholder survey and interviews To help answer Vulnerability and Risk questions: V&R Approach
  • Slide 21
  • Exposure Analysis Shoreline Study Asset Evaluation Park and Recreation Values Socio-economic Evaluation Equity Approach Data-Driven Desktop Components
  • Slide 22
  • Used refined sea level rise and storm maps to determine potential asset exposure to: Tidal inundation (i.e. daily high tide, MHHW) Storm event flooding (100-year stillwater level) Wind driven waves during a 100-year storm event Exposure Analysis
  • Slide 23
  • Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) Key Demographics Low-income population Institutionalized population Linguistically isolated Renter-occupied No vehicle Property values (Assessor) Building replacement values (HAZUS) Workplace/Employees (HAZUS) Socio-Economic Evaluation
  • Slide 24
  • Stakeholder Survey and Interviews Physical and functional sensitivity Adaptive capacity Magnitude of consequence Equity considerations Best Professional Judgment:
  • Slide 25
  • ART V&R Report Vulnerability & Risk Assessment Report Identifies the underlying causes and components of vulnerability and risk Presents methods, data and findings of the assessment www.adaptingtorisingtides.org
  • Slide 26
  • Vulnerability & Risk Profile Sheets Includes a Key Issue Statement Identifies timing of the vulnerability and scale of the consequences Classifies the vulnerabilities into actionable categories Describes consequences on people, the economy and ecosystem services Communicating V&R
  • Slide 27
  • ART Classification People Physical Qualities Ecosystem Services Scale Management Control Information Timing Vulnerability & Risk Adaptation Response Classification used to sort vulnerabilities and risks into actionable categories to support selection of adaptation strategies
  • Slide 28
  • Developed for four sectors incorporating all twelve asset categories: * Community Land Use * Utilities * Transportation * Shorelines * ART Adaptation Response
  • Slide 29
  • Issue & Action describes and classifies the vulnerability and identifies a proposed strategy Effectiveness identifies how the proposed action addresses the vulnerability Implementation the how, who and when necessary to implement the action Taken together... Action + Effectiveness + Implementation = Adaptation Response
  • Slide 30
  • Highlight key issues in the ART project area Adequate for certain types of vulnerabilities, e.g., systemic or policy issues Provides a starting point for other vulnerabilities, e.g., specific or unique assets Pinpoints the issue of scale at the ART project scale some strategies are too general ART Adaptation Response
  • Slide 31
  • Complete the Plan Step of the process Develop a portfolio of planning process tools, materials, and lessons learned Continue shoreline park adaptation planning Partner with ABAG on multi-hazard shoreline resilience initial focus on the Oakland International Airport and Bay Farm Island ART Next Steps
  • Slide 32
  • Adapting to Rising Tides Lindy Lowe [email protected] 415-352-3642 Wendy Goodfriend [email protected] 415-352-3646 Visit the ART project at: www.adaptingtorisingtides.org