17
The 1960’s and Civil Rights Legislation By Marcy James Sixties Expert!…Who Me???

The 1960’s and

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Sixties Expert!…Who Me???. The 1960’s and. Civil Rights Legislation. By Marcy James. The Essential Question :. To determine what role bipartisanship played in establishing Civil Rights Legislation. Bipartisanship. This word means “two party”. If a bill has bipartisan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The 1960’s and

The 1960’s and

Civil Rights Legislation

By Marcy James

Sixties Expert!…Who Me???

Page 2: The 1960’s and

The Essential Question:

• To determine what role bipartisanship played in establishing Civil Rights Legislation

Page 3: The 1960’s and

Bipartisanship

This word means “two party”. If a bill has bipartisansupport, it means that both major political parties, Republicans and Democrats support it.

Page 4: The 1960’s and

CongressLink

Major Features of the Civil Rights Legislation of 1964

Link to CongressLink for many resources

about the Civil Rights Legislationof 1964.

Page 5: The 1960’s and

H.R. 7152 passed February 10, 1964420 members voted ~ 290 support 130 opposedRepublicans favored the bill 138 to 34Democrats favored the bill 152 to 96A bipartisan coalition of Republicans and northern Democrats was key to the bill’s successTo pass the Senate, Republicans and Democrats would have to work together once more

Page 6: The 1960’s and

The Bill is Introduced in the Senate

To avoid the bill being delayed or pigeonholed, the bill is placed directly on the Senate calendarSenate floor debate began in March of 1964Senator Hubert Humphrey led the pro-civil rights DemocratsSenators Thomas Kuchel and Everett McKinley Dirksen led the pro-civil rights RepublicansSenator Richard Russell led the opposition

Page 7: The 1960’s and

Pro-Civil Rights Forces Take Action

Everett Dirksen and Lyndon Johnson compare notes on the legislative agenda in January 1964. Hubert Humphrey is on the left; House Speaker Carl Albert is on the right.

Page 8: The 1960’s and

“Sharp opinions have developed. Incredibleallegations have been made. The mail volume has been heavy. The bill has provoked manylong-distance phone calls, many of them late atnight or in the small hours of the morning…thousands of people have come to the Capitolto urge immediate action…Telegrams, petitions, and letters all expressed the climate of opinion that shaped the legislative struggle and pressured Congress to act.”-Everett Dirksen

The Dirksen Center

Everett Dirksen

Page 9: The 1960’s and

The Senate Debate

As the debate began it became clear thatopponents objected to two sectionsof the bill:The cut-off of federal funds to projects that discriminated against African AmericansFair employment practices enforcement *

Page 10: The 1960’s and

Opposition Forces Filibuster

•A filibuster is a delaying tactic used in the Senate to prevent a vote on a bill or a resolution. As long as at least one Senator objects to cutting off the debate, the rules state it may continue. In this manner, a small group of Senators, or even a single Senator, could delay the business of the Senate with endless debate. During the long filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Senate stayed in session around the clock. Senators had to eat and sleep near the Senate chamber.

Page 11: The 1960’s and

Pro Civil Rights Legislation Groups AFL-CIO- Labor Unions The National Council of Churches National Catholic Conference for Interracial Justice National Jewish Community Relations Advisory

council National Student Christian Federation Americans for Democratic Action Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom American Veteran’s Committee

Page 12: The 1960’s and

Dirksen Strategies to Win Swing Votes

Focused on a compromise to emphasize state responsibility for civil rights enforcement.

Focused on keeping federal government intervention in local affairs at a minimum.

Proposed 10 amendments to modify the bill assuring states primary jurisdiction over complaints about discrimination during a transition period before the federal government entered the picture. - Dirksen Center

Page 13: The 1960’s and

Filibuster Immobilized SenateFilibuster continued into JuneTwo hour speeches most commonDirksen remembered one 1500 page

speechOn May 13, Dirksen, Humphrey,

Mansfield, and Kuchel proposed a compromise

Page 14: The 1960’s and

The compromise made over 70 changes to H.R. 7152, most of them concerning wording and punctuation.

The major change was to lessen the emphasis on federal enforcement in cases involving fair employment and public accommodations.

The compromise allowed for a period of voluntary compliance before the U.S. Attorney General could act in discrimination suits.- Dirksen Center

Page 15: The 1960’s and

The procedure used to cut off debate and end a filibuster is known as cloture.

16 Senators must file a petition to end the debate. Two days after the petition is filed, the Senate takes a vote to end the

debate by limiting each Senator to one hour. With the filibuster at an end, the bill would be brought before the Senate

for a vote On June 10, 1964, after an impassioned plea by Dirksen, the Senate

voted 71 to 29 to end the Civil Rights filibuster. Cloture ended 57 days of debate. 44 Democrats and 27 Republicans supported cloture.

Page 16: The 1960’s and

On June 19, 1964, the Senate voted by a 73 To 27 roll call vote. In all, the 1964 civil rightDebate had lasted a total of 83 days, and hadTaken up almost 3,000 pages in the Congressional record.

Page 17: The 1960’s and

The 1960’s and

Civil Rights Legislation

Sixties Expert!…Who Me???

Find Out Now!