Upload
ngongoc
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“Text Linguistics”
Nowadays, textuality is assumed to be eitherLiterary or Non-literary
In non-literary texts rhetorical structure is considered to be a non-creative application of textual rules, an obligation imposed by the text
and its type.
“Text Linguistics”
Literature as a field of study is (almost) the exclusive domain of literary critics.
Non-literary textuality is left to the linguist, and many “pure” linguists confine themselves to non-literary texts, as if the two types were governed
by mutually exclusive linguistic principles.
“Text Linguistics”
Literary texts are considered not worthy of study by the linguist (as a scientist),
yet also,Literary texts are considered too aesthetically complicated, too artistically idiosyncratic, to be
studied by the linguist (as a scientist).
“Text Linguistics”
This situation is highly reflective of the modernist attitude toward the arts.
The artist, by definition, is one who imposes a personal vision on the world by breaking with
traditional kinds of composition.
“Text Linguistics”The older, formal rules of literary composition
were very different in medieval and Renaissance times – not to mention for epic Greek poetry or
skaldic Norse poetry.
Nevertheless, we recognize both Shakespeare and Beckett as belonging to the same genre despite the great differences in their work.
Therefore literary genres must also have continuity of textual forms that can permit the
identification of typological forms.
“Text Linguistics”
Typologies are in constant evolution.
General texts (i.e. non-literary) are also typologically changing over time.
Such changes are less perceptible in large part because they have not been studied previously.
“Text Linguistics”
An examination of business correspondance would show such changes over time.
So also would diplomatic correspondence:in the early part of the 20th century, the Kaiser
and the Tsar addressed themselves as My Dear Nicky and My Dear Willy (they were cousins).
Imagine Putin and Merkel addressing one another as Vladie and Angie!
“Text Linguistics”
Fissore opines that literary texts can be described as having a “sociolinguistic zero-
function.” Poets no longer praise the monarch.
Such an idea seems questionable.
However, the division of texts into expressive and communicative categories is a fact of
academic linguistic study.
“Text Linguistics”Communicative texts are based on negotiation:
tailored for certain addresseeswritten for a certain purposefollowing a textual tradition
meeting the addressee's expectationsresponding to contingent requirements
They are shaped according to textual conventions whose success has been
repeatedly put to the test.
“Text Linguistics”
Literary texts (since modernist and post-modernist innovations, at least) do not negotiate.
They seek to break from textual conventions in order to subvert them. (Supposedly)
Gertrude Stein, e e cummings, William S. Burroughs, Leslie Marmon Silko...
“Text Linguistics”
Popular literature (i.e. Best-sellers) is classed as communicative primarily because it conforms fairly strictly to models of textuality in order to
conform to reader expectations,
rather than to “challenge” the reader or “subvert” convention as high literature is seen as doing.
Steven King (Under The Dome) vs.David Foster Wallace (Infinite Jest).
“Text Linguistics”
In any case, non-literary, communicative, general texts are
far more common and will be encountered by all language users in all modern societies
far more frequently.
Most language users will also produce a great many of them as well.
“Text Linguistics”
“A science of texts demands it own terms and notions because of the nature of its object. Probablistic models are more adequate and realistic than deterministic ones. Dynamic
accounts of structure-building operations will be more productive than static description of the
structures themselves. We should work to discover regularities, strategies, motivations,
preferences, and defaults rather than rules and laws.
“Text Linguistics”Dominances can offer more realistic
classifications than can strict categories. Acceptability and appropriateness are more
crucial standards for texts than grammaticality and well-formedness. Human reasoning
processes are more essential to using and conveying knowledge in texts than logical proofs.
It is the task of science to systematize the fuzziness of its objects of inquiry, not to ignore it
or argue it away.” (De Beaugrande, Dressler, 1981)
“Text Linguistics”The functional dichotomy of Jakobson's model (referential/emotive or informative/expressive)
corresponds - more or less - with Halliday's (ideational/interpersonal) and
Lyons's (descriptive/social-expressive).
Brown and Yule (1983) offer their own dichotomy
Transactional vs. Interactional
“Text Linguistics”
Transactional
language as a tool for transmitting information
information meaning facts and figures or intellectual ideas and notions
general texts (and some literary ones)have been considered transactional
“Text Linguistics”
Interactional
language as a means of “establishing and maintaining social relationships”
(Brown and Yule 1983)
this essentially phatic use is a more recent concern of linguists, sociologists, and
sociolinguists
“Text Linguistics”
Brown and Yule do not include literature in their list of interactional genres, but one might
consider whether high literary forms - drama, poetry, the novel - are not in fact essentially a
social phenomenon.
Whatever the case may be, high literature will be excluded from our typology
of transactional forms.
“Text Linguistics”Communicative texts demonstrate
seven standards of textuality
1. Cohesion2. Coherence
3. Intentionality4. Acceptability5. Informativity6. Situationality7. Intertextuality
(De Beaugrande and Dressler, 1981)
“Text Linguistics”
‘cohesion’ refers to the surface text
grammatical and lexical dependencies Reference
SubstitutionEllipsis
ConjunctionLexical Cohesion
“Text Linguistics” ‘coherence’ refers to the real (or textual) world
the configuration of concepts and relations which underlie the surface text
for example...QuantityQuality
RelationManner
“Text Linguistics”
‘intentionality’ refers to the text writer’s attitude
the set of occurrences should constitute a text instrumental in fullfilling the producer’s intentions,
e.g. to distribute knowledge or to attain a goal specified in a plan
“Text Linguistics”
‘acceptability’ refers to the reader’s attitude to the text
the set of occurrences should have some use or relevance for the receiver, e.g. to acquire
knowledge or provide co-operation in a plan
“Text Linguistics”
‘informativity’ refers to the message of the text
to what extent is it (un)expected, (un)known, etc.
“Text Linguistics”
‘situationality’ refers to the relationship between the message and the context
those factors that make a text relevant to a certain situation in which it occurs
“Text Linguistics”
“intertextuality’ refers to other texts
the utilization of the text may be dependent upon knowledge of one or more previously
encountered texts
“Text Linguistics”
As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs. The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use. While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language, the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
Out of Order! Not a Text!
“Text Linguistics”(1) As such, it cannot be restricted to the
description of linguistic forms independent of the purposes or functions which those forms are
designed to serve in human affairs.
(2) The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use.
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
Out of Order! Not a Text!
“Text Linguistics”
(1) As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the
purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs.
“As such” being anaphoric, this sentence cannot come first.
“Text Linguistics”
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
While contrasts with the second clause of the sentence, so “3” could theoretically come first...
“Text Linguistics”
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
(2) The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use.
A detail is unlikely to come before a generality...
“Text Linguistics”(3) While some linguists may concentrate on
determining the formal properties of a language, the discourse analyst is committed to
investigation of what the language is used for.
(2) The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use.
“Discourse analyst” seems a more specific restriction of the general “analysis of discourse.”
Another detail before a generality...
“Text Linguistics”
(2) The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use.
Effective introductory sentences in scientific writing tend toward brevity, anyway...
“1” cannot be first“2” should precede “3”
“Text Linguistics”
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
(1) As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the
purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs.
“Text Linguistics”
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
(1) As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the
purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs.
“Text Linguistics”
(3) While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language,
the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
(1) As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the
purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs.
“Text Linguistics”
“1” cannot be first“2” should precede “3”
“3” should not precede “1”
therefore...
213
“Text Linguistics”
The analysis of discourse is, necessarily, the analysis of language in use. As such, it cannot be restricted to the description of linguistic forms independent of the purposes or functions which those forms are designed to serve in human affairs. While some linguists may concentrate on determining the formal properties of a language, the discourse analyst is committed to investigation of what the language is used for.
In Order! Now, a Text!
“Text Linguistics”
For a long time, only literary texts were thought worthy of study, and only the literary genres were
classified by textual typology.
Textuality was thought to rest on aesthetic qualities. Rhetorical elements were properties of literary texts, and any text that showed rhetorical
principles was thought of as a literary text.