12
TEVAR is Superior to Open Repair for Blunt Aortic Injury Royce Calhoun, MD, Stephanie Mayberg, PA- C, Bill Pevec, MD, Danh Nguyen, PhD^, Lisa Mu^ J. Nilas Young, MD John Laird, MD o Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery o Division of Cardiology ^Department of Biostatistics University of California Davis Medical Center

TEVAR is Superior to Open Repair for Blunt Aortic Injury Royce Calhoun, MD, Stephanie Mayberg, PA-C, Bill Pevec, MD, Danh Nguyen, PhD^, Lisa Mu^ J. Nilas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

TEVAR is Superior to Open Repair for Blunt Aortic Injury

TEVAR is Superior to Open Repair for Blunt Aortic Injury

Royce Calhoun, MD, Stephanie Mayberg, PA-C, Bill Pevec, MD, Danh Nguyen, PhD^, Lisa Mu^

J. Nilas Young, MD John Laird, MDo

Division of Cardiothoracic SurgeryoDivision of Cardiology

^Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of California Davis Medical Center

Royce Calhoun, MD, Stephanie Mayberg, PA-C, Bill Pevec, MD, Danh Nguyen, PhD^, Lisa Mu^

J. Nilas Young, MD John Laird, MDo

Division of Cardiothoracic SurgeryoDivision of Cardiology

^Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of California Davis Medical Center

Blunt Aortic InjuryBlunt Aortic Injury

• 75% patients die at scene of accident

• 5% are unstable and die shortly after accident

• 25% of remainder die of other injuries

• Traditional approach to repair has been emergent open repair- Paraplegia 2-19%, Mortality 15-35%

• Current trend is appropriately timed urgent repair with an evolving endovascular role - Paraplegia 0%, Mortality 0-17%

• 75% patients die at scene of accident

• 5% are unstable and die shortly after accident

• 25% of remainder die of other injuries

• Traditional approach to repair has been emergent open repair- Paraplegia 2-19%, Mortality 15-35%

• Current trend is appropriately timed urgent repair with an evolving endovascular role - Paraplegia 0%, Mortality 0-17%

MethodsMethods

• Comparison of open repair vs. stent for TTAT

• 1999 to 2011

• First thoracic aortic stent was October 2005

• Exclusively stent repair for last 4 years

• Comparison of open repair vs. stent for TTAT

• 1999 to 2011

• First thoracic aortic stent was October 2005

• Exclusively stent repair for last 4 years

ApproachApproach

• Open

- n=35

- Thoracotomy, L groin 30

- Partial bypass 24

- Full bypass 7

- DHCA 4

- Thoracotomy, Gott shunt 1

• Open

- n=35

- Thoracotomy, L groin 30

- Partial bypass 24

- Full bypass 7

- DHCA 4

- Thoracotomy, Gott shunt 1

• Endograft

- n=40

- Femoral (cut down) 33

- Iliac (RP with graft) 2

- Infrarenal Aorta (4 RP, 1 Lap) 5

• Endograft

- n=40

- Femoral (cut down) 33

- Iliac (RP with graft) 2

- Infrarenal Aorta (4 RP, 1 Lap) 5

Stent Graft ResultsStent Graft Results

• Stents Used- 7 TAG - 1 C-TAG- 17 Excluder Cuffs - 4 AneuRx Cuffs - 2 Talent - 9 TX2

• 36/40 immediate technical success

• 39/40technical success after re-interventions

• Complete coverage of traumatic tear with no stent migration or endoleaks at most recent follow-up

• Stents Used- 7 TAG - 1 C-TAG- 17 Excluder Cuffs - 4 AneuRx Cuffs - 2 Talent - 9 TX2

• 36/40 immediate technical success

• 39/40technical success after re-interventions

• Complete coverage of traumatic tear with no stent migration or endoleaks at most recent follow-up

CaseCase

• 17 YO male, ejected from car

• Intracranial bleed, multiple orthopedic injuries, splenic and liver lacerations

• Bilateral severe pulmonary contusions

• pO2 55 on 100% FIO2 with 20 PEEP

• Comminuted aortic tear

• 17 YO male, ejected from car

• Intracranial bleed, multiple orthopedic injuries, splenic and liver lacerations

• Bilateral severe pulmonary contusions

• pO2 55 on 100% FIO2 with 20 PEEP

• Comminuted aortic tear

ResultsResults

Endograft Open p

Patients 40 (33 male) 35 (30 male)

Age 39 42 0.52

ISS 43 42 0.67

Admit to OR (hrs)

57 22 <0.01

Procedure time (hrs)

3.5 5.9 <0.01

ResultsResults

Endograft Open p

Transfusions 1.9 9.1 <0.01

ICU (days) 19 18 0.61

Ventilator

(median days)

13 28 0.14

LOS (days) 35 35 0.95

F/U (mos) 23 18

Major Adverse EventsMajor Adverse Events

Endograft

n=40

Open

n=35

Death 3 7

Paraplegia 0 0

CVA 0 0

Renal Failure requiring dialysis

2 4

Subclavian Steal 2 0

Vascular Access 1 3

Re-intervention/re-op 6 5

ConclusionsConclusions• Endovascular stents for BAI can be

performed safely with excellent short and mid-term results

• Time from admission to intervention of BAI is increased in the stent group with no increased mortality

• Stents for BAI are associated with decreased OR times and intraoperative blood transfusions compared to open

• Endovascular stents for BAI can be performed safely with excellent short and mid-term results

• Time from admission to intervention of BAI is increased in the stent group with no increased mortality

• Stents for BAI are associated with decreased OR times and intraoperative blood transfusions compared to open