Upload
doandieu
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.thalesgroup.com
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Technological Convergence in
Radar & EW
Barry Trimmer
2 /2 / Content
The Drivers for Change
� Bugetary ‘Pull’
� Technological ‘Push’
Two Alternate Paths for ISTAR
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� Highly converged technology to provide multi-function sensors on
a single platform
� Highly co-operative sensing between platforms
The Key drivers for RF & Microwave
3 /3 / Drivers for Change / 1
Operational Capability and Budgetary
Cost Pressures
� The requirement for operational capability is
not obviously reducing
� In the ISTAR world with increasingly complex
situations it is arguably increasing
� The requirement for cost reduction in the
Military services is quite clear
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Military services is quite clear
� Reductions in equipment and particularly in manpower
have been announced in the UK and elsewhere
around the world
The principal cost of any security
service is manpower
So…. ?
4 /4 / Drivers for Change / 2
Technological Trends
� Current technological advances that seem relevant to the problem
as applied to ISTAR are:
� Increasing generality in RF sensing technology
� Pervasive communication systems with IT like addressing and agreed standards
for content
� Increased automation / navigation / persistence capability in unmanned platforms
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� All of these have the potential to maintain an ISTAR capability
while reducing the manpower burden
5 /5 / Tipping Points
The ‘tipping point’
� Tipping points occur when a technology or technology
combination suddenly becomes useful instead of interesting
� Recent example being the UAV
� For many years the technology that is about to come
� Combination of endurance, reliability and predictability makes it usable –
now almost essential
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Transition
To Maturity
Low reliability
High levels of attention
Major cost
High reliability
Low levels of attention
Acceptable cost of service
Design is High Tech
only where really required
Transition
To Maturity
Low reliability
High levels of attention
Major cost
High reliability
Low levels of attention
Acceptable cost of service
Design is High Tech
only where really required
6 /6 / Two alternatives for ISTAR
Tipping points appear to
be happening now in two
regimes
� The use of digitisation over
sufficiently general
application to create multi-
functionality
40− 20− 0 20 4040−
30−
20−
10−
0
0
40−
2 dB
patt_mimo_tot 6( )i_ang
mx'
⋅
2 dB
patt_set_mimo5 6, ( )i_ang
mx
⋅
2 dBpatt_mimo_tot_int i_ang
mx'_int
⋅
4040− angi_ang
deg
0.5−
0
0.5
1
1
el_pos_rx_mimoi_x_rx_mimo i_y_rx_mimo, ( )0
el_pos_tx_mimoi_y_tx_mimo( )0
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� The use of predictable,
persistent low cost
platforms, together with
pervasive communications
to create co-operation
technologies
Publish / Subscribe Boundary
PotentiallyAvailableAssets
Event /Target
Military User 1 (info, Q, T)
Military User 2 (info, Q, T)
Military User 3 (info, Q, T)
Publish / Subscribe Boundary
PotentiallyAvailableAssets
Event /Target
Military User 1 (info, Q, T)
Military User 2 (info, Q, T)
Military User 3 (info, Q, T)
1− 0.5− 0 0.5 11−
0.5−
1−
0.7340.744− el_pos_rx_mimoi_x_rx_mimo i_y_rx_mimo, ( )1
el_pos_tx_mimoi_y_tx_mimo( )1
,
7 /7 / Co-operation
Aim
� To reduce the cost of ISTAR by using multiple co-operating low cost platforms to undertake tasks normally carried out by expensive, manpower intensive systems
Driving Technologies
� Pervasive communications to link multiple platforms
� Reliable navigation and long endurance of small unmanned systems
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� Simple generic sensors
� Utilising CONOPS to reduce dynamic range requirements
Allows the same equipment to perform
� Radar and EW functions
� ELINT and COMINT functions
� Improved identification / location
Status
� Early research, but enabled by deployment of tactical UAS
8 /8 / Convergence
Aim
� To reduce the manpower and number of platforms required for ISTAR by making sensor / processing systems that can undertake multiple functions
Driving Technologies
� Use of digitisation over wide bandwidths and at high dynamic range
Use of common or combined processing to reduce the equipment
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� Use of common or combined processing to reduce the equipment required or, sometimes, to extract information not available to the single sensor
Allows the same equipment to perform
� Radar and EW functions
� ELINT and COMINT functions
Status
� Early examples exist and are being deployed
9 /9 / Landscape
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Situation
Awareness
Command
& Control
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Effector
II
Platform
Sensor
I
Effects
I
Sensor
Real World Phenomena
Signal LevelPlatforms
Mission
10 /10 / Convergence and Co-operation
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Situation
Awareness
Command
& Control
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Enabling co-operation at the mission system level between similar or dissimilar platforms
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Enabling co-operation at the Signal or Processor level between or within platforms
I
Platform
I
Platform
Platforms
Mission
Sensor
I I
Sensor
Single PlatformMulti-functionality
Sensor
I
Processing or SignalLevel Co-operation
Automated /Autonomous co-operation
(Goal Oriented)
11 /11 / Convergence Possibilities
Situation
Awareness
Command
& Control
Line of Natural Language (includes Comms and Addressing)
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
Mission
Sensor
I
Sensor
I
Two Sensors combinedat Mission System Level
Sensor
I
Sensor
Two Sensors combinedat Processing Level
Sensor
I
Two Sensors combinedat Aperture Level
12 /12 / Extreme Multi-functionality
In the Extreme
� Apertures are common
� Processing is Shared
� Dissimilar functions are carried out on common hardware
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
RF
Conditioning
RF
Conditioning
RF
Conditioning
RF
Conditioning
RF
Conditioning
RF
Conditioning
Digital
Conversion
Digital
Conversion
Digital
Conversion
Digital
Conversion
Digital
Conversion
Digital
Conversion
Digital Switch
Surveillance
Radar
Function
Electronic
Warfare
Function
Comms
Function
Tracking
Radar
Function
Why is this
‘a good thing?’
13 /13 / Architecture Advantages
Early digitisation architecture brings three distinct
advantages
� The use of major commercial development funding in both
conversion technologies and in high speed digital signal
processing
� The flexibility inherent in digital systems to allow multiple
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� The flexibility inherent in digital systems to allow multiple
functions to be engineered on the same hardware
� The potential for non-linear processes to be used in the digital
domain which would be prohibitive to engineer in analogue form
� Particularly in detection processes
� Emergent potential for logical identity / detection processes
14 /14 / Implications of Multi-functionality for RF Design
Antennas
� Key question here is the level of convergence
� Aperture convergence is expensive and bespoke- but may be necessary for space constrained applications such as combat air
� There is a question of fully filled capability from the highest to the lowest frequencies vs the partially filled architectures such as MIMO
� Antenna designs are likely to converge in consistency of phase
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
� Antenna designs are likely to converge in consistency of phase and amplitude across arrays
� Not the difference between radar and EW requirements for aperture performance
RF Conditioning
� Given the advantages of the digital architecture, RF and conversion needs to achieve:
� Wide dynamic range for multiple signal conditions
� Predictable performance as saturation takes place
15 /15 / Conclusions
There are two technologies applicable to ISTAR
� Both aimed at maintaining capability in reducing budgets
Co-operation technology envisages simple sensors operating together to create situation awareness in a complex scenario
� Principle implications lie in tying multiple platforms with simple sensors together, together with assuring the availability of the
Modify or Hide in the header / footer properties : Date
sensors together, together with assuring the availability of the platforms
Convergence envisages combining military functions in a single complex system to reduce the number of platforms / systems required to cover all the ISTAR tasks
� The implications for RF and microwave lie in
� converging the antenna approaches even if not combining apertures
� Creating high two-signal dynamic range RF conditioning and conversion
Both technologies are approaching their ‘tipping points’