Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Technological concepts and future applications of Ag and TiO2 anatase nanoparticles
produced by Green methods
Sustainable Nanotechnology Organization Conference
November, 2017
Guadalupe de la Rosa, Víctor M. Escalante-Gómez, María C. García-Castañeda, J. Antonio Reyes-Aguilera, Edgar Vázquez-Núñez, J. Jesús Ibarra-Sánchez
http://www.cnano.fr/spip.php?article8&lang=en“I don't know how to do this on a small
scale in a practical way, but I do know thatcomputing machines are very large; theyfill rooms. Why can't we make them very
small, make them of little wires, littleelements, and by little, I mean little?” R.F.
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
du
cts
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi (Tomado el 19 de mayo del 2014)
Ag
and
TiO2 NPs
4
Aplications
Any given method to obtain NPs
– Advantages
– Disadvantages
http://www.cell.com/trends/biotechnology/fulltext/S0167-7799(16)00040-8
Green Chemistry
– If NPs are intended for biomedical
purposes
– No toxic chemicals
– If medicinal plants are used…….
07/61
Using plant
extracts:
DISADVANTAGES:- Available Resouce
throughout the year
- Concentration of metabolites in the plant
- Modification of chemicalstructure of metabolitesduring the process
- Reproducibility
9
Optimization
Reproducibility
Target
19/61
Synthesis and characterization
Surface modification
Applications
Nanoparticles
09/61
1. Ag
1. Biosynthesis optimisation determining the most favorable
conditions: pH, metabolite extractant, precursor
concentration.
2. TiO2
1. Biosynthesis optimisation: pH, Relationship
extractant/TIPO; Water/TIPO, using alfalfa extracts
(isopropanol)
3. Potential applications
Obje
ctiv
es
(NPs)
22/61
Ag NPs
– Plant metabolite extractant
– H2O
– Isopropanol
– Methanol
– pH
– [Ag]
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
9.0 2.6 nm
σP = 0.29
20 nm
20 nm
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20 25 30
Rela
tive F
requency
0
10
20
30
40
12.7 5.2 nm
σP = 0.41S05
20 nm
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
8.9 2.7 nm
σP = 0.31
(c) (d)
S08
20 nm
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Rela
tive F
requency
0
10
20
30
40
12.1 2.9 nm
σP = 0.24S10
(e)
20 nm
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
8.9 2.5 nm
σP = 0.28
(f)S11
50 nm
Particle size (nm)
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
24.1 12.0 nm
σP = 0.50S12
(g)
50 nm
Particle size (nm)
5 10 15 20 25 30
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
14.9 4.7 nm
σP = 0.32S01
(a)
S02(b)(a) pH = 10, [Ag+] = 5.5 mM
and agua como PMES (S01);
(b) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 5.5 mM y
agua como PMES (S02);
(c) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 5.5 mM e
Isopropanol–Agua como
PMES: (S05);
(d) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 5.5 mM,
and Metanol–Agua como
PMES (S08);
(e) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 10 mM y
agua como PMES (S10);
(f) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 5.5 mM y
agua como PMES (S11);
(g) pH = 7, [Ag+] = 1 mM y
agua como PMES (S12).
28/61
Ag NPs synthesis
TD: Thermal decomposition; S11: H2OS08: MethanolS05: Isopropanol
Preliminary micro XAS/EXAFS
– Mixture AgCl, Ag, Ag2O
– Different proportions
– Reproducibility to be
determined
18
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/science-update/intercomparison-study-silver-nanoparticles-
food-simulants
Ag NPs
–Leather fungi
–Cancer cells
TiO2
– Anatase
– Patents:
– TiCl4
– Ti hydroxide
– PMES, TIPO/H2O
40/61
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep01959
Conditions21
(a) pH: 1, 3, 6(b) IsOH/ TIPO; 1.5:1(c) Extract/ TIPO; 0.1, 0.2, 0.3(d) TIPOReflux
Particle size (nm)
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
9.2 2.5 nm
σP = 0.27
Particle size (nm)
11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0
Rela
tive F
requency
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
13.3 1.9 nm
σP = 0.14
Particle size (nm)
7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
8.2 1.5 nm
σP = 0.18
Particle size (nm)
8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
8.9 1.9 nm
σP = 0.21
Particle size (nm)
9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
10.8 1.1 nm
σP = 0.10
Particle size (nm)
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
9.3 2.4 nm
σP = 0.26
Particle size (nm)
6 7 8 9 10 11
Rela
tive F
requency
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
8.1 1.2 nm
σP = 0.15
Particle size (nm)
22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Rela
tive F
requency
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
9.4 2.1 nm
σP = 0.22
S35
S10
S34
S02
S14 S25
S33S30
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
u.a
.
2*Theta
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200A (101)
A (004) A (200) A (105) A (213)
A (116) A (215)
S10
S06
S02
R (101)R (111)
S34
S30
S28
S27
S26
S25
S22
S18
S14
Yield24
1.Removal of colorants in water using NPs de TiO2
2.Tannery effluent treatment
3.Kinetic studies
TiO
2te
st
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=tannery+industry&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjcreDuxqnXAhUF1WMKHe5
MC6EQhyYIJg#imgrc=KIdYCJmlPlTWfM:
Concentration (mg/L)
NP size (nm)
500 1500
Average SD Average SD
300 97.9967 0.4179 95.2967 0.2701
560 95.7267 1.1091 93.2833 0.6035
WTHT NPs 3.7633 0.6258
% o
range
meth
ylre
moval
46/61
Concentration (mg/L)
NP size (nm)
500 1500
Average SD Average SD
300 97.7300 0.4004 97.7533 0.4315
560 55.4367 1.4981 95.2367 0.1274
Wtht NPs 5.6300 3.2509
% re
movalm
eth
yle
ne
blu
e
47/61
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800 400
0
50
100
150
200
250
% T
ran
sm
ita
ncia
Numero de onda (cm-1)
Azul de metileno
TiO2
TiO2 con azul
Teneria
TiO2 con naranja
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800 400
0
50
100
150
200
250Befo
reand a
fter
degra
datio
n
1hr12620 .k Cin
étic
a d
e d
egra
dació
n
1hr16820 .k
Methyl orange
Methylene blue
▪ Summary of findings, Ag
▪ Size and size distribution depend on pH, PMES, and initial Ag
concentration
▪ best numbers were obtained when PMES was water, pH 7 (8.9 ± 2.5
nm, σP = 0.28)
▪ Kinetics indicated a complex reaction
▪ NPs contain a mixture of Ag, AgCl, Ag2O 38/61
▪ Summary of findings, TiO2
▪ Size and size distribution depend on pH, H2O/TIPO, Extracts/TIPO
▪ Crystal phase may be controled (mostly, anatase is obtained)
▪ Best conditions to obtain anatase are pH 6, hydrolisis ratio 500, Extract/TIPO
ratio of 0.1
▪ Colorant degradation depends on particle size
44/61
What are we up to?
– Bouganvillea
– Vainillin
– guayacol
32
20 30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nsid
ad (
U.A
)
Ángulo de difracción (2)
TiO2 sol gel
B-agua 06
B-OH06
B-agua 03
B-OH03
20 30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nsid
ad (
U.A
)
Ángulo de difracción (2)
TiO2 sol gel
V-agua 06
V-OH 06
V-agua03
V-OH03
R. Vijayalakshmi and V. Rajendran. Arch.Appl.Sci.Res; 2012, 4(2): 1183-1190
Bouganvillea Vainillin
SEM
VANILLIN
Tannery effluent35
ZHANG Hui;ZHANG Guoliang*;YANG Zhihong;CHEN Jinyuan;NI Lijia; Degradation of Azo Dye Wastewater in a TiO2 Photocatalysis and Membrane
Separation Hybrid System ; Chinese J of Catalysis, 2009
J. Jesús IbarraVíctor EscalanteIturiel Arias
Gustavo CruzHiram Castillo
Ma. Concepción GarcíaEdgar VázquezSusana FigueroaRosalba Fuentes
37
QUESTIONS?
38
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
6
9
12
15
18
Data
Model
[Ag
+] (m
mo
l/L
)
Time (min)
99922.0
mol/L1033.7
6.4
2
6.36.36
R
sk
n
Cin
étic
ade re
acció
npara
la b
iosín
tesis
de la
SN
Ps
29/61
40
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800
0
20
40
60
80
100
% T
ran
sm
ita
nce
Wave number, (cm-1)
IsOH-Water
MeOH-Water
Water
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800
0
20
40
60
80
100Esp
ectro
s de IR
para
los d
istinto
s extra
cto
s
24/61
42