Upload
posy-simpson
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Technically difficult exploration and
environmental costs:
Supply: new sources• As oil prices remain high, and fears of ‘peak oil and gas’ increase
the search is on for new sources:
Example Source Technical challenge
Environmental impacts
Canadian (Athabasca) tar sands
Bitumen combined with sand / rock under boreal forests; close to surface
MODERATEStrip mining or extraction by steam; gas is used to heat the sands and extract oil.
HIGHEnergy intensive extraction and destruction of ecosystems
Arctic oil Conventional oil in fragile wilderness region, both on and offshore
LOWConventional drilling and extraction; Arctic oil has been taken from Prudhoe Bay for decades.
MODERATEFragile environment but production has relatively small footprint
West of Shetland, Foinaven field
Conventional oil in deep ocean water
HIGHProduction began in 1997, but using ‘floating’ rigs
LOWLow risk of spills and limited impact on sea bed
USA (Green River) oil shale
Bitumen encased in solid rock
MODERATEOpencast mining, then can be directly burnt or heated to drive off oil.
HIGHLarge areas mined, scarring landscape and energy intensive production
Viable alternatives?
• The chart below shows the estimates oil price required for each energy resource to be competitive with oil and gas without any form of State support or subsidy
Economic viability of energy sources
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Conventional Oil Middle East
Conventional Oil other
Deep water oil
Oil Shale
Coal to liquids
Tar sands
Sugar cane ethanol
USA Corn ethanol
European biodiesel
Onshore wind
Offshore wind
Oil price US$
Source: the FT 2009
• Read p 28-31 Oxford and very interesting p 34-35)
• (and p 19-21 Pearson sheet)
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Protected … but
… there are oil reserves there …
And the Prudhoe Bay oilfield is nearly exhausted.
Varying Views
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMKcxVdju8Q The truth about ANWR
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JbgzWCM0A4&feature=related Don’t believe the lies- against ANWR drilling
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xYGED1j65Y&feature=related as above longer version
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOZRrbE8Qao&feature=related ANWR blood and oil
http://www.anwr.org/Video/View-our-ANWR-Flash-Movie.php
Opinions
“I hope people understand, in a 20,000-square-mile area,
this is 2,000 acres. It is a plot of land the size of LAX that we
would want to drill to explore. ,"
Sarah Palin- John McCain's running mate for 2008 us PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
•“ANWR Drilling could keep [America]'s economy growing by creating jobs and ensuring that businesses can expand [a]nd it will make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy, scientists have developed innovative techniques to reach ANWR's oil with virtually no impact on the land or local wildlife."
"I strongly reject drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it would irreversibly damage a protected national
wildlife refuge without creating sufficient oil supplies to
meaningfully affect the global market price or have a discernible
impact on US energy security."
“We support the drilling- it will provide jobs for locals and Americans all over
the country- it will enable Alaska to further develop energy security and it
doesn’t affect us or the caribou migrations we rely on”
“Me not want any of your dirty oil spilling on me food or land- my calves might eat
it or step on it”
Other arguments in favourOther arguments in favour• A June 29, 2008 Pew Research Poll reported that 50% of
Americans favor drilling of oil and gas in ANWR while 43% oppose (compared to 42% in favor and 50% opposed in February of the same year).
• A CNN opinion poll conducted in August 31, 2008 reported 59% favor drilling for oil in ANWR, while 39% oppose it.
• A large majority of Alaskans support drilling in ANWR, including every governor, senator, representative, and legislature for the past 25 years.
• In the state of Alaska, residents receive annual dividends from oil-lease revenues. In 2000 the dividend came to $1,964 per resident.
• Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Calif., chairman of the Resources Committee, seized on the finding Tuesday that development of the refuge would boost domestic oil production by 20 percent over what it otherwise would be in 2025.
• “Given America’s energy crunch, ANWR production is a must,” Pombo, who requested the analysis, said in a statement.
• The economic impact would be negligible, thus meaning no financial reason to drill there as the amount is not thought to be enough for mass production levels
• Environmentalists state that the required network of oil platforms, pipelines, roads and support facilities, not to mention the threat of foul spills, would play havoc on wildlife.
• The US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE has stated that the 1002 area has a "greater degree of ecological diversity than any other similar sized area of Alaska’s north slope." The FWS also states, "Those who campaigned to establish the Arctic Refuge recognized its wild qualities and the significance of these spatial relationships. Here lies an unusually diverse assemblage of large animals and smaller, less-appreciated life forms, tied to their physical environments and to each other by natural, undisturbed ecological and evolutionary processes."[
• The Gwich'in tribe adamantly believes that drilling in ANWR would have serious negative effects on the calving grounds of the Porcupine Caribou herd that they partially rely on for food.
Other arguments against
The debate is about the environment (conservation)
Compared with the economy (exploitation)
About local , national and even global interests
‘But … You can’t eat the scenery’
The Arctic Tundra is a treeless plain by the Beaufort Sea
Here you can see patterned ground made by the seasonal melting of the upper ground.
“Depending on whom you listen to, ANWR’s coastal plain is either a bleak, buggy land of misery deserving no special protection or a precious piece of America’s natural history.”—James Balog
Is this place really so special?
Outdoor enthusiasts think it is …
and are against drilling for oil
Like Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay (pictured above), ANWR may soon bear the scars of modern oil extraction.
In summer the hollows fill with midge infested swamps.
The oil companies love photos like this - some environmentalists had feared that the pipeline would disrupt normal wildlife migrations. It turns out, however, that not only does the pipeline not bother the local wildlife, but some of the critters like to scratch their backs on the supports.
Do the nature lovers overstate the threats to the environment?
Polar bears, the largest bear and terrestrial predator, find prime habitat in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
There are risks to
endangered species if drilling is allowed…
Shouldn’t we cut back on fossil fuels anyway …
to slow Global
Warming?
The Inupiat of Kaktovik, Alaska
The village of Kaktovik in 1995
What local people are affected?
Tool for survival: Kaktovik whaling captain Charlie Brower displays the harpoon he uses when his village goes after its quota of three bowhead whales in the fall (Autumn).
Kaktovik is next to the Beaufort Sea and within the northern boundaries of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
They tend to support the
development – they want the
money from the oil companies
Adeline Raboff, is a member of the Gwich’in tribe
The Gwich’in Tribe live inland
They are Caribou hunters
Some of their land is Taiiga – forested with pine conifers
Arctic Village home of the Gwich’in Native Americans
The Gwich’in have the inherent right to continue our own way of life; and this right is recognized and affirmed by civilized nations in the international covenants on human rights.
The Gwich’in object to the proposed oil development because the
fear the caribou will be
disturbed
Back in mainland USA
Some ‘right wingers’ back their government
And the oil industry
And the troops in Iraq
And hate the other protesters who try to stop ‘progress’.
Environmentalists also campaign in Washington DC
The gist of the sales pitch was "we haven't spilled much oil up here, we haven't spilled much along the pipeline, the Exxon Valdez was someone else's fault ...
oh, and we're starting to run out of oil up here, so could we please please PRETTY please be allowed to start exploration in the wildlife refuge next The Oil Industry has
been ‘persuading people’ for years to try
to get permission to drill in ANWR
More researchhttp://www.anwr.org/