6
Technical Report C191-E048 1 Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division Compliance with data integrity requirements is a pressing issue for companies that are required to comply with GxP compliance. However, according a warning letter 1) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), data integrity requires not only restricting access to laboratory analytical instruments, but also assigning user rights to analytical laboratory personnel. (Refer to the excerpt below.) In response to this letter: • provide a summary of your interim controls to prevent deletion and modification of data; • define the roles and responsibilities of personnel who have access to analytical instruments and data; • detail the associated user rights for each analytical system; • provide a detailed summary of your procedural updates and associated training for user role assignment and controls; 1. User Roles and Responsibilities for Analytical Instruments 1. User Roles and Responsibilities for Analytical Instruments A typical procedure for assigning user rights is shown in Fig. 1. It shows how first (1) user rights groups are created and then (2) rights are assigned to each rights group. Next (3) users are registered and then (4) assigned to rights groups. Consequently, (5) users were successfully assigned specific user rights. The important point, as indicated in the warning letter above, is to specify who is assigned what rights (and who is assigned to which rights group). That is because assigning inappropriate user rights creates a risk that inappropriate operations might be performed. In that case, what measures should be taken to ensure appropriate rights are assigned to appropriate users? 2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users 2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users Abstract: A recent topic related to analytical data is the lack of data integrity, due to data modification or replacement, for example. Implementing measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories, but in many cases, difficulty in gaining an overall understanding of data integrity has resulted in indecision on how to proceed. Therefore, this report describes practical procedures for ensuring the data integrity for analytical instruments. Keywords: Data integrity Fig. 1 Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users Group B Assigned rights (x), (y), and (z) Group A Assigned rights (e), (f), and (g) Mr. L Ms. M Mr. N Users are successfully assigned user rights Group B Assigned rights (x), (y), and (z) Group A Assigned rights (e), (f), and (g) Mr. L Ms. M Mr. N Assign users to rights groups Group B Assigned rights (x), (y), and (z) Group A Assigned rights (e), (f), and (g) Mr. L Ms. M Mr. N Assign rights to created rights groups Registers users Group B Group A Create rights groups Mamoru Kikumoto 1 1 Practical Procedures for Compliance with Data Integrity Requirements in Analytical Laboratories

Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

TechnicalReport

Analytical laboratories use not only LC and GC systems, but also UV, FTIR, ICPMS, and other instrument types. In the case of LabSolutions DB/CS, the user rights specified for LC or GC systems can also be deployed for other types of instruments.

As shown in Fig. 6, user rights are specified as either common settings or instrument-specific settings. Common settings specify user rights settings used for all instrument types. In contrast, instrument-specific settings specify user rights settings for specific instrument types if the rights specified in common settings are not sufficient for that instrument. For example, they can be used as follows.

• Example of user rights with common settings: Rights to add proj-ects

• Example of user rights with instrument-specific settings: Rights to edit methods (pump flowrate)

In this way, user rights settings in LabSolutions DB/CS can be shared, so that user rights settings can be specified based on a unified policy, even if additional standalone systems of a different instrument type are installed or a network is created.

5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types

The process of assigning user rights is performed by customers,

because it depends significantly on the content and organization of

the customer’s business. However, if a customer finds it difficult to

specify appropriate settings, Shimadzu now offers a paid

assistance service, which is available by contacting Shimadzu as

necessary. Paid assistance service from Shimadzu (Access) will also

continue to be available, as usual, for setting specifications. Now

paid assistance will be available for user rights settings as well.

(Refer to Fig. 7.)

6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values

Fig. 6 LabSolutions DB/CS User Rights

Fig. 7 LabSolutions DB/CS Setting Speci�cations (Security Policy) and Support for Specifying User Rights

Recommended setting values for speci�cations (security policy)

LC LCMSGC FTIRUV ICPMS

Chromatography-speci�c IR-speci�cUV-speci�c ICPMS-speci�c

CommonLabSolutions DB/CS

User Rights

Contact Shimadzu separately about instrument types not shown here.

References

[1] FDA. “Reine Lifescience 5/9/18”. Warning Letter: 320-18-50. May 9, 2018. Note: The excerpt from this document is shown with some parts omitted.https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm607583.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[2] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance Using the LabSolutions Report Set”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C191-E041, Shimadzu Corporation. March 2016. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[3] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance: An Innovative Solution for Molecular Spectroscopy”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C101-E149, Shimadzu Corporation. July 2017. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[4] ISPE. “GAMP Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems (GAMP 5)”https://www.ispe.gr.jp/ISPE/07_public/07_01_19.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

Recommended setting values for user rights groups I to V

© Shimadzu Corporation, 20203655-02916-ODPIT

First Edition: April, 2020

C191-E048

1 Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division

Compliance with data integrity requirements is a pressing issue for companies that are required to comply with GxP compliance. However, according a warning letter1) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), data integrity requires not only restricting access to laboratory analytical instruments, but also assigning user rights to analytical laboratory personnel. (Refer to the excerpt below.)

In response to this letter:

• provide a summary of your interim controls to prevent deletion and modification of data;

• define the roles and responsibilities of personnel who have access to analytical instruments and data;

• detail the associated user rights for each analytical system;• provide a detailed summary of your procedural updates and

associated training for user role assignment and controls;

1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments

A typical procedure for assigning user rights is shown in Fig. 1. It shows how first (1) user rights groups are created and then (2) rights are assigned to each rights group. Next (3) users are registered and then (4) assigned to rights groups. Consequently, (5) users were successfully assigned specific user rights.

The important point, as indicated in the warning letter above, is to specify who is assigned what rights (and who is assigned to which rights group). That is because assigning inappropriate user rights creates a risk that inappropriate operations might be performed.

In that case, what measures should be taken to ensure appropriate rights are assigned to appropriate users?

2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

Abstract:A recent topic related to analytical data is the lack of data integrity, due to data modi�cation or replacement, for example. Implementing measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories, but in many cases, dif�culty in gaining an overall understanding of data integrity has resulted in indecision on how to proceed. Therefore, this report describes practical procedures for ensuring the data integrity for analytical instruments.

Keywords: Data integrity

Fig. 1 Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

⑤ Users are successfully assigned user rights

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

④ Assign users to rights groups

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

② Assign rights to created rights groups ③ Registers users

GroupB

GroupA

① Create rights groups

Fig. 5 Main Roles of User Rights Groups Recommended by LabSolutions DB/CS

Mr. A

ISystem owner

Ro

utin

e An

alytical Processes

Man

agem

ent Pro

cesses

Manages main parts of system

• The system owner manages and provides support for the operating system (Windows) and other key parts of the system.

• The system owner is analogous to so-called IT department personnel.

• For networked systems, they manage the network infrastructure, including IP addresses and so on.

• For standalone systems, however, there are not many roles for the system owner.

Manages system operation

• The process owner manages processes related to system operation (operating processes using LabSolutions DB/CS).

• The process owner serves the role of a general administration department with respect to LabSolutions DB/CS operation. Therefore, the process owner is in charge of adding users after personnel reassignments, registering newly added analytical instruments to LabSolutions DB/CS, and so on.

Mr. B

IIProcess owner

Manages testing operations

• The test manager reviews (approves, indicates non-conformity, or rejects) test results.

• Because LabSolutions DB/CS uses report sets for reviewing test results, the test manager is also in charge of creating report formats used for report sets.

• The test manager does not create method �les or perform analyses. The test leader is in charge of creating method �les and operators perform analyses.

Coordinates testing processes

• The test leader is in charge of overall testing processes.

• The test leader does not have rights for reviewing test results, so they check the content of test results, but do not make decisions. That means the test leader can leave comments about test results, but cannot review test results.

• The test leader creates method �les and batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) and performs postrun analyses in accordance with test manager instructions.

In charge of instrument operation and testing

• The role of operators is to perform analyses.

• Operators operate instruments using the method �les or batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) created by a test leader and then perform analyses. When an analysis is �nished, the operator only con�rms that the analysis was completed without any problems, whereas the test leader checks the content of results.

• Operators are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather, they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump �owrate in accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

Mr. C

IIITest manager

Ms. D

IVTest leader

Mr. E Ms. F

VOperators

Mamoru Kikumoto1

15

Practical Procedures for Compliance with Data Integrity Requirements in Analytical Laboratories

Page 2: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

Mr. A Mr. B Mr. C Ms. D Mr. E Ms. F

2 3 4

The following describes how to visualize the workflow by creating a

flow chart of computer processes involved in specifying appropriate

user rights settings. To make it easier to understand, this example is

limited to the workflow extending from LC analysis to data approval.

(Refer to Fig. 2.)

Fig. 3 shows an example of the recommended workflow involved in

using LabSolutions DB/CS software. (LabSolutions DB software is

used on a standalone basis, whereas LabSolutions CS is used via a

network.)

In this case, the workflow is described starting with the process of

specifying user rights groups, so that the overall workflow can be

considered. A user rights group is like a job title, whereas a user

rights group is a certain group of users that has been assigned

various roles, or in other words “user rights,” involved in computer

work processes. Fig. 3 shows five proposed user rights groups,

numbered from I to V.

It is important to confirm that user rights assignments to user rights

groups are appropriate, in terms of data integrity, as the assignment

process proceeds. For example, is there an excessive concentration

of rights assigned to test managers? Do operators have more rights

than they need? Are any users with job titles generally never

involved in actually performing analysis assigned the rights for

executing analyses? Ask these and other questions.

For the workflow example in Fig. 3, LabSolutions DB/CS report set

functionality is used to approve data (and metadata). A report set

consists of a packaged set of all information necessary for reviewing

data (and metadata). Report sets are created by simply right-clicking

the applicable batch file (a sequence file used to execute a

continuous series of analyses) and then clicking [Create Report Set]

on the right-click menu that is displayed, as shown in Fig. 4. For

more details, refer to the Technical Reports 2), 3) indicated in the

References section at the end of the article.

Regarding the concepts of system owners and process owners in Fig.

3, GAMP 5 4) is used as reference. GAMP 5 is a material published by

ISPE. GAMP 5 is known as a global standard reference document for

computer system validation (CSV).

3. Visualizing the Work�ow Using a Flow Chart

Fig. 3 Example of User Rights Groups and Work�ow Recommended in Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Fig. 2 LC Analysis and Data Approval

《Work�ow Example》

Not received(returned)

Received(approved)

Not received(non-conforming)

ISystem owner

IIProcess owner

IIITest manager

IVTest leader

VOperators

① Check and change

operating system settings

② Check and adjust operating

system clock setting

③ Check and change operating

system users and user

rights

⑪ Check and change

security

⑫ Check and change

users and user rights

⑬ Check and change

instrument connection

settings

⑭ Backing up and restoring

㉑ Check and change projects (location for saving data)

㉒ Create report formats for report sets

㉓ Create method �les

㉔ Create batch �les

(sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses)

㉛ Repeat operations

(postrun analyses, etc.)

㉙ Create and check report sets

㉚ Review report sets

㉕ Start up instruments

(㉖ Make slight adjustments to methods)

㉗ Execute analyses

㉘ Con�rm analyses are �nished

Approval

When a flow chart is created based on Fig. 3, write out the main

roles of each user rights group as shown in Fig. 5. The main roles

are written out so that they can be checked for any

inappropriately assigned rights that were not visible in the flow

chart. The process also enables the roles of each rights group to

be clearly identified.

In this case, for example, it indicates that the role of test

managers is to review (approve, indicate non-conformity, or

reject) test results, but not to create method files or perform

analyses. Similarly, test leaders create method files and batch

files (sequence files for executing a continuous series of analyses)

or perform postrun analyses, as instructed by the test manager,

but not perform analysis.

On the other hand, the role of operators is to perform analyses,

so they are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather,

they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to

methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump flowrate in

accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

In this way, creating the flow chart in Fig. 3 and listing the main

roles of user rights groups in Fig. 5 help ensure a workflow with

no inconsistencies in terms of data integrity.

Next, create documentation of user rights settings based on that

confirmed workflow. When that is finished, apply the settings to

operating system (Windows) and LabSolutions DB/CS settings.

4. Main Roles of User Rights Groups

Fig. 4 Procedure for Creating a Report Set Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Log inOpen

Data Manager

Generate a report set (PDF) andautomatically save it in database

Right-click a batch �le and select[Create Report Set]

Apply electronic signatureand save electronically

Applying an electronic signature to the report set also automatically inserts an electronic signature in electronic data (original data)

In charge of instrumentoperation and testing

• Analysis execution

Coordinates testingprocesses

• Method �le creation

• Batch �le creation

• Analytical results

con�rmation

• Postrun analysis execution

Manages testingoperations

• Test results approval

Manages system operation(Manages LabSolutions)

• Security management

• User management

• Instrument management

Manages main parts of system(Manages computers)

• Operating system security

management

• Operating system user

management

• Operating system clock

management

Routine Analytical ProcessesManagement Processes

Page 3: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

Mr. A Mr. B Mr. C Ms. D Mr. E Ms. F

2 3 4

The following describes how to visualize the workflow by creating a

flow chart of computer processes involved in specifying appropriate

user rights settings. To make it easier to understand, this example is

limited to the workflow extending from LC analysis to data approval.

(Refer to Fig. 2.)

Fig. 3 shows an example of the recommended workflow involved in

using LabSolutions DB/CS software. (LabSolutions DB software is

used on a standalone basis, whereas LabSolutions CS is used via a

network.)

In this case, the workflow is described starting with the process of

specifying user rights groups, so that the overall workflow can be

considered. A user rights group is like a job title, whereas a user

rights group is a certain group of users that has been assigned

various roles, or in other words “user rights,” involved in computer

work processes. Fig. 3 shows five proposed user rights groups,

numbered from I to V.

It is important to confirm that user rights assignments to user rights

groups are appropriate, in terms of data integrity, as the assignment

process proceeds. For example, is there an excessive concentration

of rights assigned to test managers? Do operators have more rights

than they need? Are any users with job titles generally never

involved in actually performing analysis assigned the rights for

executing analyses? Ask these and other questions.

For the workflow example in Fig. 3, LabSolutions DB/CS report set

functionality is used to approve data (and metadata). A report set

consists of a packaged set of all information necessary for reviewing

data (and metadata). Report sets are created by simply right-clicking

the applicable batch file (a sequence file used to execute a

continuous series of analyses) and then clicking [Create Report Set]

on the right-click menu that is displayed, as shown in Fig. 4. For

more details, refer to the Technical Reports 2), 3) indicated in the

References section at the end of the article.

Regarding the concepts of system owners and process owners in Fig.

3, GAMP 5 4) is used as reference. GAMP 5 is a material published by

ISPE. GAMP 5 is known as a global standard reference document for

computer system validation (CSV).

3. Visualizing the Work�ow Using a Flow Chart

Fig. 3 Example of User Rights Groups and Work�ow Recommended in Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Fig. 2 LC Analysis and Data Approval

《Work�ow Example》

Not received(returned)

Received(approved)

Not received(non-conforming)

ISystem owner

IIProcess owner

IIITest manager

IVTest leader

VOperators

① Check and change

operating system settings

② Check and adjust operating

system clock setting

③ Check and change operating

system users and user

rights

⑪ Check and change

security

⑫ Check and change

users and user rights

⑬ Check and change

instrument connection

settings

⑭ Backing up and restoring

㉑ Check and change projects (location for saving data)

㉒ Create report formats for report sets

㉓ Create method �les

㉔ Create batch �les

(sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses)

㉛ Repeat operations

(postrun analyses, etc.)

㉙ Create and check report sets

㉚ Review report sets

㉕ Start up instruments

(㉖ Make slight adjustments to methods)

㉗ Execute analyses

㉘ Con�rm analyses are �nished

Approval

When a flow chart is created based on Fig. 3, write out the main

roles of each user rights group as shown in Fig. 5. The main roles

are written out so that they can be checked for any

inappropriately assigned rights that were not visible in the flow

chart. The process also enables the roles of each rights group to

be clearly identified.

In this case, for example, it indicates that the role of test

managers is to review (approve, indicate non-conformity, or

reject) test results, but not to create method files or perform

analyses. Similarly, test leaders create method files and batch

files (sequence files for executing a continuous series of analyses)

or perform postrun analyses, as instructed by the test manager,

but not perform analysis.

On the other hand, the role of operators is to perform analyses,

so they are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather,

they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to

methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump flowrate in

accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

In this way, creating the flow chart in Fig. 3 and listing the main

roles of user rights groups in Fig. 5 help ensure a workflow with

no inconsistencies in terms of data integrity.

Next, create documentation of user rights settings based on that

confirmed workflow. When that is finished, apply the settings to

operating system (Windows) and LabSolutions DB/CS settings.

4. Main Roles of User Rights Groups

Fig. 4 Procedure for Creating a Report Set Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Log inOpen

Data Manager

Generate a report set (PDF) andautomatically save it in database

Right-click a batch �le and select[Create Report Set]

Apply electronic signatureand save electronically

Applying an electronic signature to the report set also automatically inserts an electronic signature in electronic data (original data)

In charge of instrumentoperation and testing

• Analysis execution

Coordinates testingprocesses

• Method �le creation

• Batch �le creation

• Analytical results

con�rmation

• Postrun analysis execution

Manages testingoperations

• Test results approval

Manages system operation(Manages LabSolutions)

• Security management

• User management

• Instrument management

Manages main parts of system(Manages computers)

• Operating system security

management

• Operating system user

management

• Operating system clock

management

Routine Analytical ProcessesManagement Processes

Page 4: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

Mr. A Mr. B Mr. C Ms. D Mr. E Ms. F

2 3 4

The following describes how to visualize the workflow by creating a

flow chart of computer processes involved in specifying appropriate

user rights settings. To make it easier to understand, this example is

limited to the workflow extending from LC analysis to data approval.

(Refer to Fig. 2.)

Fig. 3 shows an example of the recommended workflow involved in

using LabSolutions DB/CS software. (LabSolutions DB software is

used on a standalone basis, whereas LabSolutions CS is used via a

network.)

In this case, the workflow is described starting with the process of

specifying user rights groups, so that the overall workflow can be

considered. A user rights group is like a job title, whereas a user

rights group is a certain group of users that has been assigned

various roles, or in other words “user rights,” involved in computer

work processes. Fig. 3 shows five proposed user rights groups,

numbered from I to V.

It is important to confirm that user rights assignments to user rights

groups are appropriate, in terms of data integrity, as the assignment

process proceeds. For example, is there an excessive concentration

of rights assigned to test managers? Do operators have more rights

than they need? Are any users with job titles generally never

involved in actually performing analysis assigned the rights for

executing analyses? Ask these and other questions.

For the workflow example in Fig. 3, LabSolutions DB/CS report set

functionality is used to approve data (and metadata). A report set

consists of a packaged set of all information necessary for reviewing

data (and metadata). Report sets are created by simply right-clicking

the applicable batch file (a sequence file used to execute a

continuous series of analyses) and then clicking [Create Report Set]

on the right-click menu that is displayed, as shown in Fig. 4. For

more details, refer to the Technical Reports 2), 3) indicated in the

References section at the end of the article.

Regarding the concepts of system owners and process owners in Fig.

3, GAMP 5 4) is used as reference. GAMP 5 is a material published by

ISPE. GAMP 5 is known as a global standard reference document for

computer system validation (CSV).

3. Visualizing the Work�ow Using a Flow Chart

Fig. 3 Example of User Rights Groups and Work�ow Recommended in Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Fig. 2 LC Analysis and Data Approval

《Work�ow Example》

Not received(returned)

Received(approved)

Not received(non-conforming)

ISystem owner

IIProcess owner

IIITest manager

IVTest leader

VOperators

① Check and change

operating system settings

② Check and adjust operating

system clock setting

③ Check and change operating

system users and user

rights

⑪ Check and change

security

⑫ Check and change

users and user rights

⑬ Check and change

instrument connection

settings

⑭ Backing up and restoring

㉑ Check and change projects (location for saving data)

㉒ Create report formats for report sets

㉓ Create method �les

㉔ Create batch �les

(sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses)

㉛ Repeat operations

(postrun analyses, etc.)

㉙ Create and check report sets

㉚ Review report sets

㉕ Start up instruments

(㉖ Make slight adjustments to methods)

㉗ Execute analyses

㉘ Con�rm analyses are �nished

Approval

When a flow chart is created based on Fig. 3, write out the main

roles of each user rights group as shown in Fig. 5. The main roles

are written out so that they can be checked for any

inappropriately assigned rights that were not visible in the flow

chart. The process also enables the roles of each rights group to

be clearly identified.

In this case, for example, it indicates that the role of test

managers is to review (approve, indicate non-conformity, or

reject) test results, but not to create method files or perform

analyses. Similarly, test leaders create method files and batch

files (sequence files for executing a continuous series of analyses)

or perform postrun analyses, as instructed by the test manager,

but not perform analysis.

On the other hand, the role of operators is to perform analyses,

so they are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather,

they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to

methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump flowrate in

accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

In this way, creating the flow chart in Fig. 3 and listing the main

roles of user rights groups in Fig. 5 help ensure a workflow with

no inconsistencies in terms of data integrity.

Next, create documentation of user rights settings based on that

confirmed workflow. When that is finished, apply the settings to

operating system (Windows) and LabSolutions DB/CS settings.

4. Main Roles of User Rights Groups

Fig. 4 Procedure for Creating a Report Set Using LabSolutions DB/CS

Log inOpen

Data Manager

Generate a report set (PDF) andautomatically save it in database

Right-click a batch �le and select[Create Report Set]

Apply electronic signatureand save electronically

Applying an electronic signature to the report set also automatically inserts an electronic signature in electronic data (original data)

In charge of instrumentoperation and testing

• Analysis execution

Coordinates testingprocesses

• Method �le creation

• Batch �le creation

• Analytical results

con�rmation

• Postrun analysis execution

Manages testingoperations

• Test results approval

Manages system operation(Manages LabSolutions)

• Security management

• User management

• Instrument management

Manages main parts of system(Manages computers)

• Operating system security

management

• Operating system user

management

• Operating system clock

management

Routine Analytical ProcessesManagement Processes

Page 5: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

TechnicalReport

Analytical laboratories use not only LC and GC systems, but also UV, FTIR, ICPMS, and other instrument types. In the case of LabSolutions DB/CS, the user rights specified for LC or GC systems can also be deployed for other types of instruments.

As shown in Fig. 6, user rights are specified as either common settings or instrument-specific settings. Common settings specify user rights settings used for all instrument types. In contrast, instrument-specific settings specify user rights settings for specific instrument types if the rights specified in common settings are not sufficient for that instrument. For example, they can be used as follows.

• Example of user rights with common settings: Rights to add proj-ects

• Example of user rights with instrument-specific settings: Rights to edit methods (pump flowrate)

In this way, user rights settings in LabSolutions DB/CS can be shared, so that user rights settings can be specified based on a unified policy, even if additional standalone systems of a different instrument type are installed or a network is created.

5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types

The process of assigning user rights is performed by customers,

because it depends significantly on the content and organization of

the customer’s business. However, if a customer finds it difficult to

specify appropriate settings, Shimadzu now offers a paid

assistance service, which is available by contacting Shimadzu as

necessary. Paid assistance service from Shimadzu (Access) will also

continue to be available, as usual, for setting specifications. Now

paid assistance will be available for user rights settings as well.

(Refer to Fig. 7.)

6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values

Fig. 6 LabSolutions DB/CS User Rights

Fig. 7 LabSolutions DB/CS Setting Speci�cations (Security Policy) and Support for Specifying User Rights

Recommended setting values for speci�cations (security policy)

LC LCMSGC FTIRUV ICPMS

Chromatography-speci�c IR-speci�cUV-speci�c ICPMS-speci�c

CommonLabSolutions DB/CS

User Rights

Contact Shimadzu separately about instrument types not shown here.

References

[1] FDA. “Reine Lifescience 5/9/18”. Warning Letter: 320-18-50. May 9, 2018. Note: The excerpt from this document is shown with some parts omitted.https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm607583.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[2] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance Using the LabSolutions Report Set”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C191-E041, Shimadzu Corporation. March 2016. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[3] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance: An Innovative Solution for Molecular Spectroscopy”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C101-E149, Shimadzu Corporation. July 2017. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[4] ISPE. “GAMP Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems (GAMP 5)”https://www.ispe.gr.jp/ISPE/07_public/07_01_19.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

Recommended setting values for user rights groups I to V

© Shimadzu Corporation, 20203655-02916-ODPIT

First Edition: April, 2020

C191-E048

1 Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division

Compliance with data integrity requirements is a pressing issue for companies that are required to comply with GxP compliance. However, according a warning letter1) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), data integrity requires not only restricting access to laboratory analytical instruments, but also assigning user rights to analytical laboratory personnel. (Refer to the excerpt below.)

In response to this letter:

• provide a summary of your interim controls to prevent deletion and modification of data;

• define the roles and responsibilities of personnel who have access to analytical instruments and data;

• detail the associated user rights for each analytical system;• provide a detailed summary of your procedural updates and

associated training for user role assignment and controls;

1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments

A typical procedure for assigning user rights is shown in Fig. 1. It shows how first (1) user rights groups are created and then (2) rights are assigned to each rights group. Next (3) users are registered and then (4) assigned to rights groups. Consequently, (5) users were successfully assigned specific user rights.

The important point, as indicated in the warning letter above, is to specify who is assigned what rights (and who is assigned to which rights group). That is because assigning inappropriate user rights creates a risk that inappropriate operations might be performed.

In that case, what measures should be taken to ensure appropriate rights are assigned to appropriate users?

2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

Abstract:A recent topic related to analytical data is the lack of data integrity, due to data modi�cation or replacement, for example. Implementing measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories, but in many cases, dif�culty in gaining an overall understanding of data integrity has resulted in indecision on how to proceed. Therefore, this report describes practical procedures for ensuring the data integrity for analytical instruments.

Keywords: Data integrity

Fig. 1 Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

⑤ Users are successfully assigned user rights

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

④ Assign users to rights groups

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

② Assign rights to created rights groups ③ Registers users

GroupB

GroupA

① Create rights groups

Fig. 5 Main Roles of User Rights Groups Recommended by LabSolutions DB/CS

Mr. A

ISystem owner

Ro

utin

e An

alytical Processes

Man

agem

ent Pro

cesses

Manages main parts of system

• The system owner manages and provides support for the operating system (Windows) and other key parts of the system.

• The system owner is analogous to so-called IT department personnel.

• For networked systems, they manage the network infrastructure, including IP addresses and so on.

• For standalone systems, however, there are not many roles for the system owner.

Manages system operation

• The process owner manages processes related to system operation (operating processes using LabSolutions DB/CS).

• The process owner serves the role of a general administration department with respect to LabSolutions DB/CS operation. Therefore, the process owner is in charge of adding users after personnel reassignments, registering newly added analytical instruments to LabSolutions DB/CS, and so on.

Mr. B

IIProcess owner

Manages testing operations

• The test manager reviews (approves, indicates non-conformity, or rejects) test results.

• Because LabSolutions DB/CS uses report sets for reviewing test results, the test manager is also in charge of creating report formats used for report sets.

• The test manager does not create method �les or perform analyses. The test leader is in charge of creating method �les and operators perform analyses.

Coordinates testing processes

• The test leader is in charge of overall testing processes.

• The test leader does not have rights for reviewing test results, so they check the content of test results, but do not make decisions. That means the test leader can leave comments about test results, but cannot review test results.

• The test leader creates method �les and batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) and performs postrun analyses in accordance with test manager instructions.

In charge of instrument operation and testing

• The role of operators is to perform analyses.

• Operators operate instruments using the method �les or batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) created by a test leader and then perform analyses. When an analysis is �nished, the operator only con�rms that the analysis was completed without any problems, whereas the test leader checks the content of results.

• Operators are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather, they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump �owrate in accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

Mr. C

IIITest manager

Ms. D

IVTest leader

Mr. E Ms. F

VOperators

Mamoru Kikumoto1

15

Practical Procedures for Compliance with Data Integrity Requirements in Analytical Laboratories

Page 6: Technical Report • For standalone systems, however, there are not … · 2020. 5. 20. · measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories,

TechnicalReport

Analytical laboratories use not only LC and GC systems, but also UV, FTIR, ICPMS, and other instrument types. In the case of LabSolutions DB/CS, the user rights specified for LC or GC systems can also be deployed for other types of instruments.

As shown in Fig. 6, user rights are specified as either common settings or instrument-specific settings. Common settings specify user rights settings used for all instrument types. In contrast, instrument-specific settings specify user rights settings for specific instrument types if the rights specified in common settings are not sufficient for that instrument. For example, they can be used as follows.

• Example of user rights with common settings: Rights to add proj-ects

• Example of user rights with instrument-specific settings: Rights to edit methods (pump flowrate)

In this way, user rights settings in LabSolutions DB/CS can be shared, so that user rights settings can be specified based on a unified policy, even if additional standalone systems of a different instrument type are installed or a network is created.

5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types5. Deploying User Rights for Other Instrument Types

The process of assigning user rights is performed by customers,

because it depends significantly on the content and organization of

the customer’s business. However, if a customer finds it difficult to

specify appropriate settings, Shimadzu now offers a paid

assistance service, which is available by contacting Shimadzu as

necessary. Paid assistance service from Shimadzu (Access) will also

continue to be available, as usual, for setting specifications. Now

paid assistance will be available for user rights settings as well.

(Refer to Fig. 7.)

6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values6. Recommended User Rights Setting Values

Fig. 6 LabSolutions DB/CS User Rights

Fig. 7 LabSolutions DB/CS Setting Speci�cations (Security Policy) and Support for Specifying User Rights

Recommended setting values for speci�cations (security policy)

LC LCMSGC FTIRUV ICPMS

Chromatography-speci�c IR-speci�cUV-speci�c ICPMS-speci�c

CommonLabSolutions DB/CS

User Rights

Contact Shimadzu separately about instrument types not shown here.

References

[1] FDA. “Reine Lifescience 5/9/18”. Warning Letter: 320-18-50. May 9, 2018. Note: The excerpt from this document is shown with some parts omitted.https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm607583.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[2] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance Using the LabSolutions Report Set”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C191-E041, Shimadzu Corporation. March 2016. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[3] Mamoru Kikumoto. “Data Integrity Compliance: An Innovative Solution for Molecular Spectroscopy”. UHPLC/HPLC, LC/MS Technical Report C101-E149, Shimadzu Corporation. July 2017. http://www.an.shimadzu.co.jp/hplc/prominence/tec.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

[4] ISPE. “GAMP Guide: A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems (GAMP 5)”https://www.ispe.gr.jp/ISPE/07_public/07_01_19.htm, (accessed August 1, 2018).

Recommended setting values for user rights groups I to V

© Shimadzu Corporation, 20203655-02916-ODPIT

First Edition: April, 2020

C191-E048

1 Analytical & Measuring Instruments Division

Compliance with data integrity requirements is a pressing issue for companies that are required to comply with GxP compliance. However, according a warning letter1) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), data integrity requires not only restricting access to laboratory analytical instruments, but also assigning user rights to analytical laboratory personnel. (Refer to the excerpt below.)

In response to this letter:

• provide a summary of your interim controls to prevent deletion and modification of data;

• define the roles and responsibilities of personnel who have access to analytical instruments and data;

• detail the associated user rights for each analytical system;• provide a detailed summary of your procedural updates and

associated training for user role assignment and controls;

1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments1. User Roles and Responsibil it ies for Analytical Instruments

A typical procedure for assigning user rights is shown in Fig. 1. It shows how first (1) user rights groups are created and then (2) rights are assigned to each rights group. Next (3) users are registered and then (4) assigned to rights groups. Consequently, (5) users were successfully assigned specific user rights.

The important point, as indicated in the warning letter above, is to specify who is assigned what rights (and who is assigned to which rights group). That is because assigning inappropriate user rights creates a risk that inappropriate operations might be performed.

In that case, what measures should be taken to ensure appropriate rights are assigned to appropriate users?

2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users2. Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

Abstract:A recent topic related to analytical data is the lack of data integrity, due to data modi�cation or replacement, for example. Implementing measures to ensure data integrity has become an urgent issue at analytical laboratories, but in many cases, dif�culty in gaining an overall understanding of data integrity has resulted in indecision on how to proceed. Therefore, this report describes practical procedures for ensuring the data integrity for analytical instruments.

Keywords: Data integrity

Fig. 1 Procedure for Assigning User Rights to Users

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

⑤ Users are successfully assigned user rights

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

④ Assign users to rights groups

GroupB

Assigned rights

(x), (y), and (z)

GroupA

Assigned rights

(e), (f), and (g)

Mr. L

Ms. M Mr. N

② Assign rights to created rights groups ③ Registers users

GroupB

GroupA

① Create rights groups

Fig. 5 Main Roles of User Rights Groups Recommended by LabSolutions DB/CS

Mr. A

ISystem owner

Ro

utin

e An

alytical Processes

Man

agem

ent Pro

cesses

Manages main parts of system

• The system owner manages and provides support for the operating system (Windows) and other key parts of the system.

• The system owner is analogous to so-called IT department personnel.

• For networked systems, they manage the network infrastructure, including IP addresses and so on.

• For standalone systems, however, there are not many roles for the system owner.

Manages system operation

• The process owner manages processes related to system operation (operating processes using LabSolutions DB/CS).

• The process owner serves the role of a general administration department with respect to LabSolutions DB/CS operation. Therefore, the process owner is in charge of adding users after personnel reassignments, registering newly added analytical instruments to LabSolutions DB/CS, and so on.

Mr. B

IIProcess owner

Manages testing operations

• The test manager reviews (approves, indicates non-conformity, or rejects) test results.

• Because LabSolutions DB/CS uses report sets for reviewing test results, the test manager is also in charge of creating report formats used for report sets.

• The test manager does not create method �les or perform analyses. The test leader is in charge of creating method �les and operators perform analyses.

Coordinates testing processes

• The test leader is in charge of overall testing processes.

• The test leader does not have rights for reviewing test results, so they check the content of test results, but do not make decisions. That means the test leader can leave comments about test results, but cannot review test results.

• The test leader creates method �les and batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) and performs postrun analyses in accordance with test manager instructions.

In charge of instrument operation and testing

• The role of operators is to perform analyses.

• Operators operate instruments using the method �les or batch �les (sequence �les for executing a continuous series of analyses) created by a test leader and then perform analyses. When an analysis is �nished, the operator only con�rms that the analysis was completed without any problems, whereas the test leader checks the content of results.

• Operators are not assigned all rights for changing methods. Rather, they are only assigned rights for making slight adjustments to methods, such as changing the solvent delivery pump �owrate in accordance with the Japanese Pharmacopoeia.

Mr. C

IIITest manager

Ms. D

IVTest leader

Mr. E Ms. F

VOperators

Mamoru Kikumoto1

15

Practical Procedures for Compliance with Data Integrity Requirements in Analytical Laboratories