33
Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January 10, 2010

Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

  • View
    221

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR)

Survey – Fall 2010Summary Statistics

Data compiled byThe Office of Institutional Effectiveness

January 10, 2010

Page 2: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

Introduction

• This file includes summary statistics from the Fall 2010 TLTR Survey which was made available to all faculty and staff of the campus via web-form in late November 2010.

• The survey was generated by members of the TLTR Communications subcommittee based on review of results from previous surveys, interviews with members of various constituencies, and consultation with other members of the TLTR.

Page 3: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

expert advanced average novice phobic user

Series1 0.094 0.354 0.51 0.031 0.01

5.00%

15.00%

25.00%

35.00%

45.00%

55.00%

1. In the use and knowledge of computers and instructional technology, I consider myself an: (n=96)

Perc

enta

ge

Page 4: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

1. In the use and knowledge of computers and instructional technology, I consider myself an:

Choice Count Percentage of Sample Answering

Percentage of Sample Asked

Percentage of Total Sample

expert 9 9.4% 9.2% 9.2%

advanced 34 35.4% 34.7% 34.7%

average 49 51.0% 50.0% 50.0%

novice 3 3.1% 3.1% 3.1%

phobic user 1 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%

Page 5: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

2. I have explored the TLTR website prior to taking this survey: (n=96)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Yes No

Percent

Page 6: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

2. I have explored the TLTR website prior to taking this survey:

Choice Count Percentage of Sample Answering

Percentage of Total Sample

Yes 24 25.0% 24.5%

No 72 75.0% 73.5%

Page 7: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

Academic (teaching & librarians) Non-teaching professionals Management confidential Other

Series1 0.49 0.323 0.094 0.094

2.50%

7.50%

12.50%

17.50%

22.50%

27.50%

32.50%

37.50%

42.50%

47.50%

3. Please check your title: (n=96)Pe

rcen

tage

Page 8: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

3. Please check your title:Choice Count Percentage of Sample

AnsweringPercentage of Total Sample

Academic (teaching & librarians)

47 49.0% 48.0%

Non-teaching professionals 31 32.3% 31.6%

Management confidential 9 9.4% 9.2%

Other 9 9.4% 9.2%

Page 9: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. I have satisfac-tory ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-ware.

b. Ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-

ware in class-room com-puter labs is

satisfac-tory.

c. Ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-

ware in projec-

tion class-

rooms is satis-factory.

d. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

BearPaws.

e. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

Black-board.

f. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

Bear-DeN.

g. I find the

Bear-DeN in-terface easy to

use.

h. I am satisfied with the

new com-bined

EarlyAlert

process/web form.

i. I find the new book-store web-form

for or-dering text-

book-seasy to

use.

j. I am familiar

with Moodle

and think the

campus should

adopt it.

k. I am familiar

with Black-Board

and think the

cam-pussho

uld keep it.

l. I un-der-

stand how to

produce Adobe

Acrobat fillable, savable forms

for campus

use.

m. I am satisfied with the use of elec-

tronic forms

on campus(

e.g. travel docs, pur-

chasing requisi-tions).

n. I am well in-formed about open access soft-ware that stu-

dents can use on per-sonal com-

puters.

o. I am satisfied with the process for up-dating

de-part-

mental web

pages.

p. I am satisfied with the search

capabili-ties of

the campus

web site.

q. The campus should adopt a univer-sal cal-endar/meeting schedul-ing sys-

tem.

Strongly agree

6 0 2 12 3 9 8 12 1 7 7 8 5 11 6 2 23

Agree

44 32 34 59 36 25 27 30 13 13 18 25 39 10 23 28 30

No opinion

19 20 18 7 17 21 20 20 21 37 31 5 18 15 14 7 24

Dis-agree

8 7 12 11 10 15 15 7 5 9 13 34 16 31 26 22 12

Strongly dis-agree

1 2 2 2 6 4 3 3 21 7 9 14 12 16 19 35 3

Not ap-pli-ca-ble

19 36 27 5 24 23 24 24 35 23 17 10 6 14 8 2 4

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

4. Software: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Page 10: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. I have satisfac-tory ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-ware.

b. Ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-

ware in class-room com-puter labs is

satisfac-tory.

c. Ac-cess to instruc-tional

and re-search soft-

ware in projec-

tion class-

rooms is satis-factory.

d. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

BearPaws.

e. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

Black-board.

f. I am pleased with the reliabil-

ity, func-

tional-ity, and admin-

istration of

Bear-DeN.

g. I find the

Bear-DeN in-terface easy to

use.

h. I am satisfied with the

new com-bined

EarlyAlert

process/web form.

i. I find the new book-store web-form

for or-dering text-

book-seasy to

use.

j. I am familiar

with Moodle

and think the

campus should

adopt it.

k. I am familiar

with Black-Board

and think the

cam-pussho

uld keep it.

l. I un-der-

stand how to

produce Adobe

Acrobat fillable, savable forms

for campus

use.

m. I am satisfied with the use of elec-

tronic forms

on campus(

e.g. travel docs, pur-

chasing requisi-tions).

n. I am well in-formed about open access soft-ware that stu-

dents can use on per-sonal com-

puters.

o. I am satisfied with the process for up-dating

de-part-

mental web

pages.

p. I am satisfied with the search

capabili-ties of

the campus

web site.

q. The campus should adopt a univer-sal cal-endar/meeting schedul-ing sys-

tem.

Strongly agree

6 0 2 12 3 9 8 12 1 7 7 8 5 11 6 2 23

Agree

44 32 34 59 36 25 27 30 13 13 18 25 39 10 23 28 30

No opinion

19 20 18 7 17 21 20 20 21 37 31 5 18 15 14 7 24

Dis-agree

8 7 12 11 10 15 15 7 5 9 13 34 16 31 26 22 12

Strongly dis-agree

1 2 2 2 6 4 3 3 21 7 9 14 12 16 19 35 3

Not ap-pli-ca-ble

19 36 27 5 24 23 24 24 35 23 17 10 6 14 8 2 4

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

4. Software: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Nu

mb

er

of

Re

spo

nse

s

Page 11: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

4. Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements. Topic SA A No opp D SD NA Not Ans

a. I have satisfactory access to instructional and research software. 6 44 19 8 1 19 1

b. Access to instructional and research software in classroom computer labs is satisfactory.

0 32 20 7 2 36 1

c. Access to instructional and research software in projection classrooms is satisfactory.

2 34 18 12 2 27 3

d. I am pleased with the reliability, functionality, and administration of BearPaws.

12 59 7 11 2 5 2

e. I am pleased with the reliability, functionality, and administration of Blackboard.

3 36 17 10 6 24 2

f. I am pleased with the reliability, functionality, and administration of BearDeN.

9 25 21 15 4 23 1

g. I find the BearDeN interface easy to use. 8 27 20 15 3 24 1

h. I am satisfied with the new combined EarlyAlert process/web form. 12 30 20 7 3 24 2

i. I find the new bookstore web-form for ordering textbookseasy to use. 1 13 21 5 21 35 2

j. I am familiar with Moodle and think the campus should adopt it. 7 13 37 9 7 23 2

k. I am familiar with BlackBoard and think the campusshould keep it. 7 18 31 13 9 17 3

l. I understand how to produce Adobe Acrobat fillable, savable forms for campus use.

8 25 5 34 14 10 2

m. I am satisfied with the use of electronic forms on campus(e.g. travel docs, purchasing requisitions).

5 39 18 16 12 6 2

n. I am well informed about open access software that students can use on personal computers.

11 10 15 31 16 14 1

o. I am satisfied with the process for updating departmental web pages. 6 23 14 26 19 8 2

p. I am satisfied with the search capabilities of the campus web site. 2 28 7 22 35 2 2

q. The campus should adopt a universal calendar/meeting scheduling system.

23 30 24 12 3 4 2

Page 12: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. I am satisfied with the reliability, per-

formance, and<br>administrati

on of Helios.

b. I am satisfied with the reliability, per-

formance, and<br>administration of the network.

c. Performance of faculty lifecycle

computers is ade-quate<br>for in-

structional and re-search purposes.

d. Access to class-room computer labs

is adequate.

e. I am satisfied with the reliability, func-

tionality, and ad-ministration<br>of

classroom computer labs.

f. I am satisfied with my ability to reserve

and access<br>projectio

n classrooms.

g. I am satisfied with the reliability and

functionality of<br>projection

classrooms.

Strongly agree 10 7 4 4 4 2 4

Agree 56 61 36 25 26 30 34

No opinion 14 7 19 22 24 16 16

Disagree 10 19 19 9 11 12 13

Strongly dis-agree

3 1 5 11 1 12 5

Not applicable 4 0 13 26 30 24 24

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

5. Hardware & Infastructure: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Perc

enta

ge

Page 13: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. I am satisfied with the reliability, per-

formance, and<br>administrati

on of Helios.

b. I am satisfied with the reliability, per-

formance, and<br>administration of the network.

c. Performance of faculty lifecycle

computers is ade-quate<br>for in-

structional and re-search purposes.

d. Access to class-room computer labs

is adequate.

e. I am satisfied with the reliability, func-

tionality, and ad-ministration<br>of

classroom computer labs.

f. I am satisfied with my ability to reserve

and access<br>projectio

n classrooms.

g. I am satisfied with the reliability and

functionality of<br>projection

classrooms.

Strongly agree 10 7 4 4 4 2 4

Agree 56 61 36 25 26 30 34

No opinion 14 7 19 22 24 16 16

Disagree 10 19 19 9 11 12 13

Strongly dis-agree

3 1 5 11 1 12 5

Not applicable 4 0 13 26 30 24 24

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

5. Hardware & Infastructure: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Num

ber o

f Res

pons

es

Page 14: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

5. Hardware and InfastructureTopic Stronglyag

reeAgree Noopinion Disagree Strongly

disagreeNotapplicable

Not Answered

a. I am satisfied with the reliability, performance, andadministration of Helios.

10 56 14 10 3 4 1

b. I am satisfied with the reliability, performance, andadministration of the network.

7 61 7 19 1 0 3

c. Performance of faculty lifecycle computers is adequatefor instructional and research purposes.

4 36 19 19 5 13 2

d. Access to classroom computer labs is adequate.

4 25 22 9 11 26 1

e. I am satisfied with the reliability, functionality, and administrationof classroom computer labs.

4 26 24 11 1 30 2

f. I am satisfied with my ability to reserve and accessprojection classrooms.

2 30 16 12 12 24 2

g. I am satisfied with the reliability and functionality ofprojection classrooms.

4 34 16 13 5 24 2

Page 15: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. Allocation of financial re-

sources with re-spect to technol-

ogyissues on campus is trans-

parent.

b. The College should allocate additional re-

sources toward-stechnology in-

frastructure (e.g. reliable network,

storage...).

c. The status of ongoing technol-ogy projects (e.g. projectionclass-rooms, Internet 2) on campus is adequately dis-

seminated.

d. The faculty has satisfactory input prior to technol-ogydecisions re-lating to class-

rooms.

e. The faculty has satisfactory input regarding overall-technology plan-ning on campus.

f. The College ad-dresses technol-

ogy needs on campusthrough effective plan-

ning.

g. The current or-ganization struc-ture for dealing with technolo-

gyissues on cam-pus works well.

h. The College is well positioned

compared to other institution-

sin its support and use of tech-

nology.

Strongly agree

0 14 1 3 2 2 2 5

Agree 19 53 26 20 18 26 33 15

No opinion 42 19 31 38 35 37 29 39

Disagree 25 7 30 15 22 23 23 22

Strongly dis-agree

6 2 3 4 4 5 6 10

Not applica-ble

5 1 4 16 14 3 3 3

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

6. Funding and Planning: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Perc

enta

ge

Page 16: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. Allocation of financial re-

sources with re-spect to technol-

ogyissues on campus is trans-

parent.

b. The College should allocate additional re-

sources toward-stechnology in-

frastructure (e.g. reliable network,

storage...).

c. The status of ongoing technol-ogy projects (e.g. projectionclass-rooms, Internet 2) on campus is adequately dis-

seminated.

d. The faculty has satisfactory input prior to technol-ogydecisions re-lating to class-

rooms.

e. The faculty has satisfactory input regarding overall-technology plan-ning on campus.

f. The College ad-dresses technol-

ogy needs on campusthrough effective plan-

ning.

g. The current or-ganization struc-ture for dealing with technolo-

gyissues on cam-pus works well.

h. The College is well positioned

compared to other institution-

sin its support and use of tech-

nology.

Strongly agree

0 14 1 3 2 2 2 5

Agree 19 53 26 20 18 26 33 15

No opinion 42 19 31 38 35 37 29 39

Disagree 25 7 30 15 22 23 23 22

Strongly dis-agree

6 2 3 4 4 5 6 10

Not applica-ble

5 1 4 16 14 3 3 3

Series7 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 4

5

15

25

35

45

55

6. Funding and Planning: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Num

ber o

f Res

pons

es

Page 17: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

6. Funding and PlanningTopic Strong

lyagree

Agree Noopinion

Disagree

Stronglydisagree

Notapplicable

Not Answered

a. Allocation of financial resources with respect to technology issues on campus is transparent.

0 19 42 25 6 5 1

b. The College should allocate additional resources towards technology infrastructure (e.g. reliable network, storage...).

14 53 19 7 2 1 2

c. The status of ongoing technology projects (e.g. projection classrooms, Internet 2) on campus is adequately disseminated.

1 26 31 30 3 4 3

d. The faculty has satisfactory input prior to technology decisions relating to classrooms.

3 20 38 15 4 16 2

e. The faculty has satisfactory input regarding overall technology planning on campus.

2 18 35 22 4 14 3

f. The College addresses technology needs on campus through effective planning.

2 26 37 23 5 3 2

g. The current organization structure for dealing with technology issues on campus works well.

2 33 29 23 6 3 2

h. The College is well positioned compared to other institutions in its support and use of technology.

5 15 39 22 10 3 4

Page 18: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. Campus-based training opportunities in technology

are atappropri-ate times and

frequency.

b. Campus-based training opportunities in technology focuson the

necessary top-ics.

c. There is a need for a Technology

Training Center - a singlepoint of contact on

the SUNY Pots-dam campus

responsiblefor technology-re-lated training.

d. I would be more likely to use new in-structional

technology if there was a

training center with an open door policy.

e. Formal train-ing (programs, seminars, etc. ) should count-toward profes-

sional devel-opment/con-tinuing ap-pointment.

f. The College needs to allo-cate additional resources to-

wardsthorough training for the

faculty in in-structional

technologies.

g. I know about the effective-ness of new technologies that areavail-

able (e.g. inter-active

&ldquo;smartboard&rdquo;

vs. passive pro-jection).

h. I am inter-ested in learn-ing more about

how various technolo-

giesenhance or do not enhance

learning.

i. I would like to be able to ac-cess Podcasts

or Power-Pointsrelated to

technology training.

Strongly agree

3 1 19 15 21 16 10 21 16

Agree 22 34 44 47 46 35 29 43 43

No opinion 32 36 22 12 14 22 13 17 22

Disagree 30 16 6 11 8 13 20 3 5

Strongly disagree

6 2 1 2 2 0 8 1 1

Not appli-cable

0 2 0 6 2 7 11 7 6

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

7. Training in Instructional Technologies: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Perc

enta

ge

Page 19: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. Campus-based training opportunities in technology

are atappropri-ate times and

frequency.

b. Campus-based training opportunities in technology focuson the

necessary top-ics.

c. There is a need for a

Technology Training Center - a singlepoint of contact on

the SUNY Pots-dam campus

responsiblefor technology-re-lated training.

d. I would be more likely to use new in-structional

technology if there was a

training center with an open door policy.

e. Formal train-ing (programs, seminars, etc. ) should count-toward profes-

sional devel-opment/con-tinuing ap-pointment.

f. The College needs to allo-cate additional resources to-

wardsthorough training for the

faculty in in-structional

technologies.

g. I know about the effective-ness of new technologies that areavail-

able (e.g. inter-active

&ldquo;smartboard&rdquo;

vs. passive pro-jection).

h. I am inter-ested in learn-ing more about

how various technolo-

giesenhance or do not enhance

learning.

i. I would like to be able to ac-cess Podcasts

or Power-Pointsrelated to

technology training.

Strongly agree

3 1 19 15 21 16 10 21 16

Agree 22 34 44 47 46 35 29 43 43

No opinion 32 36 22 12 14 22 13 17 22

Disagree 30 16 6 11 8 13 20 3 5

Strongly disagree

6 2 1 2 2 0 8 1 1

Not appli-cable

0 2 0 6 2 7 11 7 6

2.5

7.5

12.5

17.5

22.5

27.5

32.5

37.5

42.5

47.5

7. Training in Instructional Technologies: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Num

ber o

f Res

pons

es

Page 20: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

Question 7 - ATopic SA A No Op D SD Notap

pNot Ans

a. Campus-based training opportunities in technology are at appropriate times and frequency.

3 22 32 30 6 0 5

b. Campus-based training opportunities in technology focus on the necessary topics.

1 34 36 16 2 2 7

c. There is a need for a Technology Training Center - a single point of contact on the SUNY Potsdam campus responsible for technology-related training.

19 44 22 6 1 0 6

d. I would be more likely to use new instructional technology if there was a training center with an open door policy.

15 47 12 11 2 6 5

e. Formal training (programs, seminars, etc. ) should count toward professional development/continuing appointment.

21 46 14 8 2 2 5

f. The College needs to allocate additional resources towards thorough training for the faculty in instructional technologies.

16 35 22 13 0 7 5

g. I know about the effectiveness of new technologies that area available (e.g. interactive smartboard vs. passive projection).

10 29 13 20 8 11 7

h. I am interested in learning more about how various technologies enhance or do not enhance learning.

21 43 17 3 1 7 6

i. I would like to be able to access Podcasts or PowerPoints related to technology training.

16 43 22 5 1 6 5

Page 21: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. The mission of the TLTR is clear.

b. The TLTR effec-tively communi-

cates the needs of facultyand staff

to the administra-tion.

c. The TLTR effec-tively communi-

cates Administra-tive/CTSre-

sponses back to faculty.

d. I receive ade-quate informa-tion about tech-

nology avail-ableon campus.

e. Communica-tion concerning

technology issues on campusis sat-

isfactory.

f. I know how to communicate with the TLTR

about technolo-gyissues impor-

tant to me.

g. The TLTR web site provides ad-equate informa-

tion concern-ingthe TLTR and campus technol-

ogy issues.

h. The TLTR should have oc-

casional open fo-rums for input-

from faculty.

Strongly agree

6 4 0 5 0 5 3 5

Agree 36 23 23 28 27 38 17 40

No opinion 31 53 45 19 19 19 54 35

Disagree 17 10 16 36 43 27 11 5

Strongly dis-agree

1 1 2 4 4 1 3 0

Not applica-ble

3 2 6 1 0 2 5 8

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

8. Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Perc

enta

ge

Page 22: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. The mission of the TLTR is clear.

b. The TLTR effec-tively communi-

cates the needs of facultyand staff

to the administra-tion.

c. The TLTR effec-tively communi-

cates Administra-tive/CTSre-

sponses back to faculty.

d. I receive ade-quate informa-tion about tech-

nology avail-ableon campus.

e. Communica-tion concerning

technology issues on campusis sat-

isfactory.

f. I know how to communicate with the TLTR

about technolo-gyissues impor-

tant to me.

g. The TLTR web site provides ad-equate informa-

tion concern-ingthe TLTR and campus technol-

ogy issues.

h. The TLTR should have oc-

casional open fo-rums for input-

from faculty.

Strongly agree

6 4 0 5 0 5 3 5

Agree 36 23 23 28 27 38 17 40

No opinion 31 53 45 19 19 19 54 35

Disagree 17 10 16 36 43 27 11 5

Strongly dis-agree

1 1 2 4 4 1 3 0

Not applica-ble

3 2 6 1 0 2 5 8

5

15

25

35

45

55

8. Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Num

ber o

f Res

pons

es

Page 23: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

8. Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable: Topic Strongl

yagreeAgree Noopinio

nDisagree

Stronglydisagree

Notapplicable

Not Answered

a. The mission of the TLTR is clear. 6 36 31 17 1 3 4

b. The TLTR effectively communicates the needs of faculty and staff to the administration.

4 23 53 10 1 2 5

c. The TLTR effectively communicates Administrative/CTS responses back to faculty.

0 23 45 16 2 6 6

d. I receive adequate information about technology availableon campus.

5 28 19 36 4 1 5

e. Communication concerning technology issues on campus is satisfactory.

0 27 19 43 4 0 5

f. I know how to communicate with the TLTR about technologyissues important to me.

5 38 19 27 1 2 6

g. The TLTR web site provides adequate information concerning the TLTR and campus technology issues.

3 17 54 11 3 5 5

h. The TLTR should have occasional open forums for input from faculty.

5 40 35 5 0 8 5

Page 24: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. The CTS website is useful for

finding campus

technology-informa-

tion.

b. The mis-sion of the

Instruc-tional

Technology Center

(ITC)is clear.

c. Hardware and soft-ware are

installed or repaired in

atimely fashion.

d. Technol-ogy sup-

port is de-livered in a

timely manner.

e. Response to my tech-

nology emergen-cies has been-

prompt and satisfactory.

f. CTS un-derstands the tech-nology

needs of faculty.

g. CTS is re-sponsive to

my tech-nology

needs and instruction-

alissues.

h. CTS hours are

adequate to serve my

needs.

i. I am aware of the large format printing policy.

j. The dis-tinction be-

tween teaching

and schol-arly activity isclear with respect to the large format printing policy.

k. The cam-pus is kept appropri-ately in-

formed in a timelyman-ner during scheduled technology

outages.

l. The cam-pus is kept appropri-ately in-

formed in a timelyman-ner during unsched-uled tech-

nology out-ages.

Strongly agree

8 1 11 14 24 13 16 12 9 2 17 8

Agree 53 41 61 60 52 33 44 52 25 17 59 44

No opinion

19 28 12 8 6 28 19 14 12 35 6 13

Dis-agree

15 19 5 8 9 6 8 12 35 21 12 23

Strongly dis-agree

1 3 5 3 4 1 2 4 5 3 1 7

Not ap-plicable

1 5 3 3 2 14 7 3 10 17 2 2

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

9. Computing and Technology Services: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Perc

enta

ge

Page 25: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

a. The CTS website is useful for

finding campus

technology-informa-

tion.

b. The mis-sion of the

Instruc-tional

Technology Center

(ITC)is clear.

c. Hardware and soft-ware are

installed or repaired in

atimely fashion.

d. Technol-ogy sup-

port is de-livered in a

timely manner.

e. Response to my tech-

nology emergen-cies has been-

prompt and satisfactory.

f. CTS un-derstands the tech-nology

needs of faculty.

g. CTS is re-sponsive to

my tech-nology

needs and instruction-

alissues.

h. CTS hours are

adequate to serve my

needs.

i. I am aware of the large format printing policy.

j. The dis-tinction be-

tween teaching

and schol-arly activity isclear with respect to the large format printing policy.

k. The cam-pus is kept appropri-ately in-

formed in a timelyman-ner during scheduled technology

outages.

l. The cam-pus is kept appropri-ately in-

formed in a timelyman-ner during unsched-uled tech-

nology out-ages.

Strongly agree

8 1 11 14 24 13 16 12 9 2 17 8

Agree 53 41 61 60 52 33 44 52 25 17 59 44

No opinion

19 28 12 8 6 28 19 14 12 35 6 13

Dis-agree

15 19 5 8 9 6 8 12 35 21 12 23

Strongly dis-agree

1 3 5 3 4 1 2 4 5 3 1 7

Not ap-plicable

1 5 3 3 2 14 7 3 10 17 2 2

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

9. Computing and Technology Services: Indicate your level of agreement (or disagreement) for each of the following statements.

Num

ber o

f Res

pons

es

Page 26: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

9. Computing and Technology Services. Topic SA A No

opD SD NA Not

Ansa. The CTS website is useful for finding campus technology information.

8 53 19 15 1 1 1

b. The mission of the Instructional Technology Center (ITC)is clear.

1 41 28 19 3 5 1

c. Hardware and software are installed or repaired in a timely fashion.

11 61 12 5 5 3 1

d. Technology support is delivered in a timely manner. 14 60 8 8 3 3 2

e. Response to my technology emergencies has been prompt and satisfactory.

24 52 6 9 4 2 1

f. CTS understands the technology needs of faculty. 13 33 28 6 1 14 3

g. CTS is responsive to my technology needs and instructional issues.

16 44 19 8 2 7 2

h. CTS hours are adequate to serve my needs. 12 52 14 12 4 3 1

i. I am aware of the large format printing policy. 9 25 12 35 5 10 2

j. The distinction between teaching and scholarly activity isclear with respect to the large format printing policy.

2 17 35 21 3 17 3

k. The campus is kept appropriately informed in a timely manner during scheduled technology outages.

17 59 6 12 1 2 1

l. The campus is kept appropriately informed in a timely manner during unscheduled technology outages.

8 44 13 23 7 2 1

Page 27: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

campus network and sys-tem reli-ability (black-board, email,

BearPAWS/Bear

DeN)

main-tain/cre-

ate &ldquo;projection'

' class-rooms

[replaces the term &ldquo;smart&rd

quo; class-

rooms - contain podium, projec-

tor, com-

puter(s)]

expand wireless access

profes-sional devel-

opment (training)

in the use of in-

struc-tional

technol-ogy

universal calendar/meeting schedul-ing soft-

ware that works with all

plat-forms/PDAs

campus re-

sources allocated

to CTS

software availabil-

ity to faculty (course

prepara-tion, as-

sess-ment,

grading, bibliog-raphy...)

en-hanced learning

man-agement software

(e.g. Black-board)

capability

commu-nication of tech-nology

issues on campus

distance learning

increased Help Desk

availabil-ity (be-yond 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.)

availabil-ity of hard-ware

other (please

comment below)

software availabil-ity for in-

struc-tional

technol-ogy

Internet 2

Se-ries1

0.602 0.429 0.347 0.255 0.173 0.143 0.122 0.122 0.112 0.102 0.092 0.092 0.082 0.071 0.051

5.00%

15.00%

25.00%

35.00%

45.00%

55.00%

65.00%

10a. Priorities: Please check the 3 most important technology issues for Col-lege resource allocation

Perc

enta

ge

Page 28: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

10. PrioritiesChoice Count Percent of Total

Sample

campus network and system reliability (blackboard, email, BearPAWS/Bear DeN) 59 60.2%

increased Help Desk availability (beyond 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) 9 9.2%

availability of hardware 9 9.2%

maintain/create projection'' classrooms [replaces the term - smart;classrooms - contain podium, projector, computer(s)]

42 42.9%

professional development (training) in the use of instructional technology 25 25.5%

communication of technology issues on campus 11 11.2%

expand wireless access 34 34.7%

distance learning 10 10.2%

universal calendar/meeting scheduling software that works with all platforms/PDAs 17 17.3%

Internet 2 5 5.1%

campus resources allocated to CTS 14 14.3%

software availability to faculty (course preparation, assessment, grading, bibliography...) 12 12.2%

software availability for instructional technology 7 7.1%

enhanced learning management software (e.g. Blackboard) capability 12 12.2%

other (please comment below) 8 8.2%

Page 29: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

10b. Other Software• Banner• ODS/EDW• Again, we need a computer lab--several that can accommodate 40 student classes.• STATA and SPSS statistical software site licenses, ICPSR data availability, and Endnote (or

another bibliographic) software site license would enhance/ enable student-faculty research.

• I've just noticed that Adobe Creative Suite is available for faculty computers...• maintain “projection" classrooms gets all three of my votes.• Why would you need resources for "communication of technology issues on campus" - not

sure how this would cost more money!• Outlook• Matlab should be installed. Free access to Adobe Acrobat Professional to students and

Faculty• enhanced website-better content management that is more frequently updated, as well as

more varied types of media for promotions (ie. virtual tours and webcasts)• The start-up time of the podium computers in projection classrooms is truly an issue. It

CANNOT take longer to adjust the computer than there is scheduled time between classes. At more than 20 minutes to restart a podium computer, your class is shot. A solution to this must be a priority. If it involves purchasing different security software or other hardware, then so be it. The check for "increased Help Desk availability" really means, increased help from a live person. I'll take either more types of help between 8 and 4:30, or more hours - either would be helpful, both would be ideal.

Page 30: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

• Unity• Move to moodle, save some people's jobs with the cost saving.

10b. Other Software

Page 31: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

Moo-dle

Inter-net 2

Smartboard

s

Open-Sourc

e Soft-ware

Pod-cast-ing

Videochat &

On-line Col-

labo-ration

e-Read-

ers

Digital Text-

books

iTunes U

Fire-fox

Exten-sions

Click-ers

Screencast-

ing

Blog-ging

Wikis RSS Social Net-

work-ing

Black-board

Mashups

Twit-ter

Tex-ting

Other (please list)

Se-ries1

0.418 0.286 0.245 0.194 0.194 0.173 0.153 0.122 0.112 0.112 0.102 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.051 0.051 0.01 0.01

2.50%

7.50%

12.50%

17.50%

22.50%

27.50%

32.50%

37.50%

42.50%

11a. Please check items about which you would like to learn more.Pe

rcen

tage

Page 32: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

11a. Please check items about which you would like to learn more.Choice Count Percent of Total Sample

Internet 2 28 28.6%

iTunes U 11 11.2%

Open-Source Software 19 19.4%

RSS 6 6.1%

Podcasting 19 19.4%

Screencasting 8 8.2%

e-Readers 15 15.3%

Firefox Extensions 11 11.2%

Blogging 8 8.2%

Mashups 5 5.1%

Wikis 8 8.2%

Twitter 5 5.1%

Social Networking 6 6.1%

Texting 1 1.0%

Clickers 10 10.2%

Videochat & Online Collaboration 17 17.3%

Digital Textbooks 12 12.2%

Smartboards 24 24.5%

Moodle 41 41.8%

Blackboard 6 6.1%

Other (please list) 1 1.0%

Page 33: Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable (TLTR) Survey – Fall 2010 Summary Statistics Data compiled by The Office of Institutional Effectiveness January

11b. Other programs• Better calendar programs because scheduling meetings with various

several members of the department can take weeks because none of us can easily view each others' availability.

• I don't know what most of the list even is, so I do not know what I would like to learn to use.

• all of the above• Website development software like Dreamweaver or something similar.

I don't know what Mashups, Screencasting or open-source sofware are!• Social networking for keeping in touch with alumni would be helpful.• The use of video games for teaching at the college level.• Unit• Web Page Design and Publisher