48
Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy Integrating ICT across the curriculum “It’s not simply changing paper for digital files” (Hedberg 2006) Terry Fogarty Doctoral Candidate - UNE

Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

  • Upload
    pello

  • View
    42

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy. Integrating ICT across the curriculum “It’s not simply changing paper for digital files” (Hedberg 2006). Terry Fogarty Doctoral Candidate - UNE. Today’s Presentation Integrating ICT across the curriculum. Reports on: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Integrating ICT across the curriculum“It’s not simply changing paper for digital files” (Hedberg 2006)

Terry FogartyDoctoral Candidate - UNE

Page 2: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Today’s PresentationIntegrating ICT across the curriculum

Reports on: a comprehensive literature review an action research pilot case study in two schools some ideas on how ICT could be integrated a reflection on a post-constructivist epistemology and learning theory that could be considered to inform any integration process

Page 3: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

All things change (in time)

Students would teach themselves Teachers would be employed as ‘learning advisors’*

Who would have thought?

The Swiss watch would become obsolete

Celluloid would go from cinemas

The Berlin Wall would fall

* SMH 16 Sep O6: Corpus Christie High School, Oak Flats

Page 4: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

The way students learnhas changed

Teachers now compete hourly against the Internet“learners connect understanding across disciplines, applying key concepts and evaluating multiple solutions within ethical frameworks” (MCEETYA, 2005)

Page 5: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

The way teachers need to teachhas changed

1999: MCEETYA’s ‘Adelaide Declaration’ 2001: Decision to test ICT skills 2004: Integration of ICT across the curriculum (Stages 4 & 5)

2004: NSW Teacher’s Act 2006: Computer Skills Assessment Test

The winds of change have been:

Page 6: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Do students know more?

Quite possibly! students often know more about technology (Spender, 2003; Lawson, 2004; Elliott (2004)

students did better in a test on skills unfamiliar to their teachers (Fogarty, 2005)

Than their teachers?

SMH: Doherty, 2005

Page 7: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

ICT in the Classroom

Teacher’sCMS -Wiki

Secure ClassPortal

ProductivityTools

(MS Office)

Thinking to Learn

MindTools

CommunicationsDiscuss (BB) Reflect (BLOG)

Testing Assessment

Chat

LAMS

MailCalendar

(MS Outlook)

ExternalLearning Portals

Reporting

StudentConstruction

ICT SubjectObjects

Learning Objects

MS

DESKTOP

INTERNNET

WWW

LMS

Technology

Pedagogy

Page 8: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Problems with ICT in the classroom

Students 1st cohort schooled for 3 rather than four years

Teachers Lack time, resources and support

Schools Concern re assuring student outcomes

Page 9: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Are students ready?

We find out on Monday, 11th December 2006 with the release of the NSW School Certificate results incl. CSAT

Recent in school study

Source: Fogarty 2006

Teachers claim Technology Students perform

Good skills

Lack skills

Lack skills

Good skills

MS Word

Data Base

Multimedia

www & @mail

Badly

On average

Best

OK

Page 10: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

ICT in the classroom?

REGULARLY (20%)

5% expert users

15% serious users

Sources: Fogarty, Phelps et al, Leung et al, Conlon, Becker, Cuban

MOSTLY NOT (80%)

35% occasionally

45% never

Teachers use of

Page 11: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Teachers can use computers!

For administration

Personal productivity

80% use at home to prepare less lessons

communicate with colleagues

search the InternetSource: Cuban, 2000

Page 12: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Are teachers ready?Lack of computersPoor reliabilityLack of technology supportLack of pedagogy supportLack of resourcesLow levels of competencyLack confidenceLack timeNot part of school cultureWorking conditionsNeed to ‘unlearn’ traditional pedagogy

Sources: Hayes, Probert, Cuban, Cuttance, Dailhou, Varasidas & Glass

Fogarty (2006)

80+% want training

Many don’t know how

Page 14: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Two schools (one state, one private)

Around 60 teachers engaged in three projects

Stage 5 English – Create a Visual Ad

Stage 5 Geography – Population Pyramid

Teacher’s Multimedia (Create a website in 3-easy steps)

Case Study: Net-ICTThe integration of ICT across the curriculum

Page 15: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

“We’re English teachers – what’s it got to do with us?”

6.2 Students learn to: compose a range of imaginative texts including narrative, poetry, instructions, scripts, advertisements and websites

On-line student guide

Page 16: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

ICT expert needed to:

Develop learning resources Web site ‘How to’ guides Activity task sheet

Book resourcesTrain subject teachersConduct/assist lessons (for some teachers)

Teachers

ICT

Expert

Page 17: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Student Exemplar

Page 18: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

GeographyStage 5

“Create a Population Pyramid”

MS Excel, Paint & Word

Page 19: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Multimedia for teachers“Create a website in 3-easy steps”

82% of teachers had reported they lacked Multimedia competency44+ teachers invited to personal training – 11 accepted (25%)

Step-by-step

Learning Guide

(10 mins.)

Page 20: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Teacher reflections

VISUAL ADVERTISEMENT

“This activity worked well”

“ Really fitted in well with our work”

POPULATION PYRAMID

“It was a great activity – one I will use again and again”

TEACHER MULITMEDIA

“Excellent”, “Very important”

ALL DEEMED

SUCCESSFUL

Page 21: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Issues (raised by teachers)

“Why are subject teachers expected to teach ICT skills?”“General lack of training and experience with ICT”“Team subject and ICT specialist”“Lack of reliable access to computers”“Prefer paired or small group activities” (allows one student to assist another)

Page 22: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Project reflection

Teacher’s concern of lack of experience, competency and resources are valid

Appropriately supported, hesitant and cautious teachers can successfully engage students with disruptive pedagogy to develop ICT competency

Page 23: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Project Recommendations

Promote disruptive pedagogies

Redesign learning spaces

Release ICT experts to develop training, pedagogy and resources

Productively redeploy IT infrastructure

Adopt National ICT Standards?

Page 24: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Infectious, endemic ICT – students engage & enjoy learning

It means students mayengage & learn!!

Page 25: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Where is the best place to start?Some IDEAS for integrating ICT

Zemsky & Massey suggest:

• PowerPoint & Email

• Course Management Systems

• Digital interactive resources

• Total redesign of curriculum (using new pedagogy)

Source: Zemsky & Massey

Page 26: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

How ready are teachers?Teachers are reasonably confident with PowerPoint and Email

Are teachers ready for Learning Management Systems?

LAMS

Page 28: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Professional learning sequencefor teachers

Adopt an operational strategy to match the ICT and pedagogical competencies of teachers with the technological readiness of the school

Key short term goal: Manage the technology environment to establish teacher confidence in ICT

PLS

SMS

CBS

CMS

LMS

LAMS

Page 29: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Professional Developmentfor teachers

Develop individualised Professional ICT Development plans for teachers

PLS

PD

CBS

CMS

LMS

LAMS

Page 30: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Confidence Building Solutionfor teachers

Provide teachers with:

Stable, supported technology

Specialist ICT support

Time to learn and integrate

PLS

PD

CBS

CMS

LMS

LAMS

Page 31: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Content Management Solutionfor teachers

‘”It’s not just about changing paper for digital” (Hedberg)

“But perhaps that is a place to start” (Fogarty)

PLS

PD

CBS

CMS

LMS

LAMS

Which LMS?

Page 32: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Learning outcomes

Source: Metros (2003)

Page 33: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Phase 1: Learning System

ProductivityTools

MS Office

Thinking to Learn

MindTools

CommunicationsDiscuss Reflect

Testing Assessment

Chat Rooms

MailCalendar

MS Outlook

ExternalLearning Portals

Reporting

ICT SubjectObjects

Learning Objects

GRAPHICAL

EDITOR

MS

FILE

MGR

Teacher’sCollaborative

Secure ClassPortal

StudentConstruction

Page 34: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Many teachers

Can electronically produce: Course outlines Assessment schedules Homework requirements Learning activity sheets Assessment Task sheets Resources lists Useful websites lists

Page 35: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Subject/Course/Class NoodlesRelatively simple for teachers to:

Create wiki pages

Upload files

Hyperlink resources

Page 36: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Graphical Web page editor

Page 37: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Upload a file

Page 38: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Class Portal (Noodle)

Page 39: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

REFLECTIONEnter Disruptive Pedagogy

A ‘new way’ of teaching that will eventually replace current classroom practiceKey dimensions include:

high order thinking skills, dialogic literacy, ‘democratised’ resources generative personal construction of understandings, knowledge scaffolding representational framing of ideas, student engagement, and social interaction.

Sources: Hedberg, Jonassen, Bereiter & Scardamalia, Metros, Salmon)

Page 40: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Are teachers & schools ready for Disruptive Pedagogy?

Conservative in nature Resistant to changeLack of technology infrastructure & supportLack of preparation & release timeIncompatibility: traditional teaching/ spaces with constructivist learning frameworksNeed for policy,curriculum, and assessment reform?

Sources: Vrasidas & Glass 2005; Fogarty 2006

Page 41: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Constructivist learning

Most disruptiveICT-based pedagogy

tends to be constructivist in

nature

Constructionism

Social

Constructivism

Page 42: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Each teacher,

known as a

LEARNING

ADVISOR supports

the growth and

learning of a small

groups of students

in a technology

rich learning

environment

SMH 16 September 2006

Page 43: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

A new epistemology?

What is the best epistemology to inform pedagogy for the digital ‘connected’ classroom?

Is Constructivism the best approach?Herron & Reason’s Participatory / Cooperative approach is of some interest (including as the basis for Action Research in schools)

Page 44: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Participatory / Cooperative Learning

Epistemology

Methodology

Knowledge accumulation

Critical subjectivity

Participatory transaction

Experiential, propositional

Practical knowing, Co-created

Political participation

Collaborative action

Primacy of the practical

Shared experiential

Communities of inquiry within communities of practice

Source: Herron & Reason

Page 45: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

CONNECTIVISM

A new learning theory for the digital age?

Diversity of opinionsConnecting information sources (knowledge collectives)Critical capacity to know moreNurturing and maintaining connections Identifying connections between fields, ideas, and conceptsCurrency is crucial, Lens of shifting realityDecision-making as a learning processWhat is right today may be wrong tomorrow

Source: Seimens

Page 46: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Practical Knowing

Aristotelian heritagePhronesis – practical, context dependent values deliberation

Episteme – theoretical knowledge

Techne – pragmatic, context-dependent practical rationality

Bloom’s learning domains

Affective – attitudes, values, belief

Cognitive – knowledge

Psychomotor - skills

Greenwood & Levin typify social science knowledge as bridging concrete practical intelligence with value-based reflectivity

Page 47: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Social Collectives

Derive from Plato’s ‘Panpsychism’

The social mind within communities of practice

Collective knowing

Group mind (such as wikipedia?)

Amplifying learning, knowledge and understanding – the epitome of Connectivism

Sources: Seimens, Brown, Greenwood & Levin

Page 48: Teachers responding to disruptive pedagogy

Technical Credits

Animations: office.microsoft.com/clipart

MP3 soundtracks: freeplaymusic.com Opening herald: “Night Watch” Change theme: “Knife Fight” Multimedia for all: “Warriors Knights” Closing theme: “Holdin Back”

Contact: [email protected]