22
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning DataMay 5, 2015

Page 2: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Goals for Today• Whole Group:

– Review State Requirements for Student Learning Data

– Learn about the Student Learning Objective (SLO) Model and Review Kindergarten Example

– Learn about the Four Target Setting Models

• Team Activities– Develop SLO’s in content level groups– With a partner team, present SLO and assess

using the SLO Checklist– Revise SLO based on team feedback & SAVE to

Thumbdrive

Page 3: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

3

State Requirements:Overall Educator Rating

Beginning in the 2015-2016 school year, a district shall include student learning data in teacher and administrator’s overall rating according to the following schedule:

• SY 2015‐16 & SY 2016‐17, at least 20%

• SY 2017‐18, at least 35%

• SY 2018‐19 and after, at least 50%4 AAC 19.010(e)(2)

Page 4: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

4

State Requirements: Educator Engagement

• Educators subject to the evaluation system must be consulted when establishing performance standards for student growth 4 AAC 04.205(e)(1)

• When selecting the measures in a particular subject and grade level, educators who teach the subject and grade level or a related subject and grade level must be consulted 4 AAC 19.030(d)

Page 5: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

5

State Requirements:Student Learning Data

• Includes two to four measures of student growth per teacher or administrator 4 AAC 04.205(e)(2)

• Uses data from the statewide, standard-based test as one measure, when and where appropriate 4 AAC 04.205(e)(3)

• Insures students’ data are appropriately assigned to the educator 4 AAC 04.205(e)(5)

• Required in administrator and teacher evaluations beginning in the 2015-2016 school year 4 AAC 19.030(d)

Page 6: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Questions about why we are adding Student Learning Data?

Page 7: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

7

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning of the year for all students or for subgroups of students.

Page 8: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

8

Use existing assessments that educators already consider

reasonable, creditable and consistent.

Striving for assessments that are valid and reliable.

Best Practice for Starting with SLOs

Page 9: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Examples of Existing Assessments• CPAA• MAP• AIMSweb• AMP

– Unavailable as a measure until FY18

• Curriculum Embedded Assessments– Text Books Pre- & Post-

• Industry Based Assessments– CNA Certification

Page 10: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

10

Student Population Which students will be included in the

SLO? A roster of students can also be useful with this element.

Interval of Instruction What is the duration of the SLO? A full

year, a semester, etc.

Standard and ContentWhat is the content that will be covered by the SLO? The focus should be a “big”

idea.

SLOs – What do they look like?

Page 11: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

11

AssessmentWhat assessment will be used and why was it

selected?

Baseline/Trend Data What information is available about the level of

preparedness of the students? What information is available concerning the other students performance on this assessment?

Student Targets What are the individual growth target for the

students covered by this SLO? How where those targets established?

SLOs – What do they look like?

Page 12: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Target Setting Methods• Individual Growth

– Customized growth based on student’s data history

• Basic Growth– All students will grow by 30 points.

• Banded/Range-based/Tiered– Students in the lowest quartile will grow by 45 wpm;

students in the 2nd quartile will grow by 40 wpm…

• Half to 100 or Closing the Gap– A student scores a 60 on the fall assessment. They

must earn an 80 on the spring assessment to meet the growth target.

Page 13: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Complete the Target Setting Activity

Share your observations with your group.

Page 14: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Process for Developing SLOs• Content Level Groups

– Develop SLOs – Naming of documents

• SLOContentDataTarget Method:

–SLOPEPresidentalFitnessBanded

–Save in the SAVE NEW SLOs HERE

Page 15: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

15

Which students will be included in the SLO? A roster of students can also be useful with this element.

Example:All 6th grade students with fall and spring assessments scores, who have had continuous enrollment, will be included in this SLO.

Student Population

Page 16: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

16

What is the duration of the SLO? A full year, a semester, etc.

Example:Full Year

September 15, 2016 through May 15, 2017

Interval of Instruction

Page 17: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

17

What is the content that will be covered by the SLO? The focus should be a “big” idea.

Example:6th Grade LiteracyMSBSD Scope & SequenceComprehension Using Information: FGU6-1: Locate information explicitly stated in narrative and informational text to answer literal comprehension questions in a written and/or spoken form.[

Standard and Content

Page 18: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

18

What assessment will be used and why was it selected?

Example:NWEA MAP Reading RIT Score for Goal: Literature

Sub-goal: Key Ideas and DetailsGoal: Informational Text

Sub-goal: Key Ideas and DetailsRationale for assessment: MAP has been used in our district for several years and has strong historical district and school data. It provides information directly related to a student’s growth in literacy.Administration: The guidelines provided by the test vendor and district will be followed.

Assessment

Page 19: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

19

What information is available about the level of preparedness of the students? What information is available concerning the other students performance on this assessment?

Example:MAP Achievement Status and Growth Summary ReportLevels of Preparedness: Beginning of Year NormLow: 207 and Below (5th Grade BOYN)Middle: 208 to 215High: 216 and Above (7th Grade BOYN)

Baseline/Trend Data

Page 20: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

20

What are the individual growth target for the students covered by this SLO? How where those targets established?

Example:Banded GrowthLow Performers: 5 Points – Based on 5th grade norm growthMiddle Performers: 4 Points – Based on 6th grade norm growth High Performers: 3 Points – Based on 7th grade norm growth

Growth Target Rationale: The growth target was determined by examining the baseline data from the fall and the national average of growth in the area of reading. The growth targets were determined in collaboration with a district team of educators.

Student Targets

Page 21: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

SLO Presentation Process• Groups present SLO to each other• Use the SLO Quality Checklist ensuring

criteria for all six indicators are met– Student Population – Interval of Instruction – Standard and Content– Assessment– Baseline/Trend Data – Student Targets

• Revise SLO based on team feedback• Submit in FINAL draft form

Page 22: Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015

Thank You for your expertise, time, and dedication to the MSBSD!