Upload
priya-ram
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
1/10
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
2/10
developed to directly determine the whole collection of
genes within an environmental sample without construct-
ing a metagenomic library (Edwards et al., 2006; Turn-
baugh et al., 2006; Cox-Foster et al., 2007; Biddle et al.,
2008; Brulc et al., 2009; Palenik et al., 2009).
The four metagenomics approaches described above
can be characterized as unselective (shotgun analysis
and next-generation sequencing) and targeted (activity-
driven and sequence-driven studies) metagenomics
based on their random and directed sequencing strate-
gies respectively. Unselective metagenomics is becoming
an increasingly common strategy due to its simplicity and
cost-effectiveness in DNA sequencing. Many projects of
random sequencing of microbial communities, such as
bacteria, archaea and viruses, have been reported (Chen
and Pachter, 2005).
Here, we focus on targeted metagenomics studies,
which combine metagenomic library screening and sub-
sequent sequencing analysis. The approach is a more
effective means to understanding the content and com-position of genes for key ecological processes in microbial
communities.
Excessive advances in DNA
sequencing technology
The use of shotgun sequencing technology for under-
standing microbial species and their role in ecosystems
was first reported by Tyson and colleagues (2004) using a
low-complexity environment. The authors reported that
two bacterial genera (Leptospirillum, Sulfobacillus) and
one archaeon (Ferroplasma) dominated the biofilms
present in an acidic mine drainage habitat based on 16S
rDNA sequence analyses. A shotgun sequence experi-
ment was then performed. Nearly complete genomes of
the two dominant species and the partial genomes of
three less dominant species were reconstructed. As a
result, microbial metabolic pathways were discovered in
this particular ecosystem. Thus, the detection of metabolic
routes via metagenomics opened the door to post-
metagenomic studies that gain further insight into genetic
networks and metabolic pathways in environmental
microbes.
Subsequently, several whole-community shotgun
sequencing studies were performed (DeLong et al., 2006;Gill et al., 2006; Wegley et al., 2007; Gilbert et al., 2008).
These studies provided much useful information about
potential metabolic pathways of uncultivated environmen-
tal microorganisms. At the same time, the ability to recon-
struct metagenomic DNA fragments and determine
metabolic routes decreased dramatically as the genomic
complexity increased. In the microbial genomic diversity
assay of the Sargasso Sea, Venter and colleagues (2004)
determined the nucleotide sequences of over 1 billion
base pairs. Their results showed that large fragments
could only be assembled for the most dominant commu-
nity members and the majority of the fragments obtained
through shotgun sequencing could not be assigned to any
specific microorganism. In predicting the function of more
diverse ecosystems, the power of the environmental
shotgun sequencing approach is rather limited because of
inherent problems associated with limited accessibility to
the genomes of less abundant members of the commu-
nity. A rare biosphere, such as Methylophaga-like methy-
lotrophs, reported to play a significant role in methanol
metabolism in marine environments, could not be cap-
tured by such an approach (Neufeld et al., 2008).
The recent development of second-generation
sequence technologies has enabled us to obtain much
more DNA information from highly complex microbial
communities (Mardis, 2008). The analysis of longer con-
tiguous sequences allows us to identify not only open
reading frames, but also operons. Longer gene units,
such as mobile genetic elements, are evident only whenlarge genomic fractions can be assembled. However,
short sequence reads (varying between 20 and 700 bp
depending on the sequencing technology used) that are
dissociated from their original species can be joined to
lengths usually not exceeding 5000 bp due to the large
phylogenetic complexity. Consequently, the reconstruc-
tion of a whole genome is not possible (Wooley et al.,
2010). Even if reconstruction was successful, identifying
an entire transcriptional unit can be problematic
(Wommack et al., 2008; Hoff, 2009). Thus, these frag-
mented and lower-quality sequences lack sufficient infor-
mation to understand their function and ecological
relevance. Furthermore, another growing problem is the
handling and management of the massive amount of
metagenomic sequence data generated by these tech-
nologies, which requires computational infrastructure and
accessible tools for storage and further analysis.
Targeted metagenomics strategies
Two different metagenomics strategies are possible:
unselective and targeted metagenomics (Fig. 1). Random
sequencing of an environmental DNA pool using high-
throughput sequencing technology is becoming increas-
ingly common. However, as described above, methods forgenerating and interpreting metagenomics data remain in
the early stages of development. In a targeted metage-
nomics approach, a deliberately selected DNA pool is
subjected to sequencing to reduce genetic complexity.
The selection process is usually based on (i) sequence-
driven screening or (ii) function-driven screening. By
focusing efforts on sequence analysis, targeted metage-
nomics can provide broad coverage and extensive redun-
dancy of sequences for targeted genes and reveal
14 H. Suenaga
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
3/10
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
4/10
Table
1.
Comparisonofunselectiveandtargetedmetagenomics.
Environment
Markergene/phenotype
Screeningmeth
od
Sequence
size(Mb)
Reference
Unselectivemetagenomics
Acidminedrainage
76
Tysonetal.(2004)
Sargassosea
1625
Venteretal.(2004)
NorthPacificSubtropicalGyre
64
DeLongetal.(2006)
Humandistalgut
78
G
illetal.(2006)
Coral
32
W
egleyetal.(2007)
Controlledcoastaloceanmesocosm
323
G
ilbertetal.(2008)
Targetedmetagenomics
Sequence-drivenscreening
Antarcticcoastalwater
16SrDNA
PCR
0.260
G
rzymskietal.(2006)
Coastandshelfwater
16SrDNAofplanctomy
cete
PCR
0.233
W
oebkenetal.(2007)
Harboursediment
I-CeuIsite(23SrRNAg
ene)
0.438
Nesbetal.(2005)
Marinesediment
dsrAB,aprAB
PCR
0.111
M
ussmannetal.(2005)
Grasslandsoil
nirS,nirK,nirZ
Colonyhybridiz
ation
0.218
Demancheetal.(2009)
Function-drivenscreening
Faecalfromorganicallyrearedadultpig
Tetracyclineresistance
Growthassay
0.051
Kazimierczaketal.(2009)
Activatedsludge
Bleomycinresistance
Growthassay
0.099
M
orietal.(2008)
Cowrumen
Hydrolyticactivity
Enzymeactivity
assay
0.772
Ferreretal.(2005)
Activatedsludge
Extradioldioxygenase
Enzymeactivity
assay
1.37
Suenagaetal.(2009a)
Othermethods
Forestsoil
Incorporationofthe13C
H4
pmoA,nmoX,mxaF
SIPColonyhybridiz
ation
0.015
Dumontetal.(2006)
Lakesediment
IncorporationoflabelledC1compounds
SIP
255
Kalyuzhnayaetal.(2008)
Freshwaterandmarinesediment
Magnetotacticbacteria
Magneticcollec
tion
0.521
Jo
gleretal.(2009)
16 H. Suenaga
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
5/10
taining an I-CeuI site (Marshall and Lemieux, 1992),
which exists at position 1923 in the 23S rRNA gene of
most bacteria, and specifically cloned DNA fragments
containing the 23S rRNA gene. Phylogenetic analysis of
the protein-coding sequences of 12 fosmids indicated that
a significant fraction of the genes was acquired by lateral
gene transfer. In several cases, co-transfer of functionally
related genes can be inferred.
The 16S rDNA sequences reflect only the phylogenetic
classification of host bacteria and not necessarily the
metabolic function of these organisms (Jaspers and Over-
mann, 2004). For example, Escherichia coli K-12 and
O157 : H7 (Perna et al., 2001) or strains of Bacillus
anthracis and Bacillus cereus (Ash et al., 1991), which
clearly exhibited different ecotypes based on their viru-
lence properties, showed identical 16S rRNA gene
sequences. Therefore, other genetic markers that are
associated with metabolic function are needed.
Dissimilatory sulfate reduction is a key process in the
mineralization of organic matter in marine sediments(Shen et al., 2001). Up to 50% of organic carbon in
coastal sediments is mineralized anaerobically by sulfate-
reducing prokaryotes (Jrgensen, 1982). From marine
sediments, Mussmann and colleagues (2005) screened
three fosmid DNA fragments harbouring a core set of
essential genes for dissimilatory sulfate reduction, includ-
ing genes associated with the reduction of sulfur interme-
diates (dsrAB gene) and the synthesis of the prosthetic
group of the dissimilatory sulfate reductase (aprA gene).
Sequence analysis of all fosmid inserts revealed the
genomic context of the key enzymes of dissimilatory
sulfate reduction as well as novel genes functionally
involved in sulfate respiration in their franking regions.
Based on the results of the comparative genome analy-
ses, a more comprehensive model of dissimilatory sulfate
reduction was presented. The results support the hypoth-
esis that the set of genes responsible for dissimilatory
sulfate reduction were concomitantly transferred in a
single event among prokaryotes.
A metagenomics approach combined with molecular
screening (colony hybridization) and pyrosequencing
was performed to gain insight into the genetic organiza-
tion and diversity of gene clusters or operons for denitri-
fication (Ginolhac et al., 2004; Demanche et al., 2009).
Denitrification is a microbial respiratory process withinthe nitrogen cycle responsible for the return of fixed nitro-
gen to the atmosphere. This targeted metagenomics
study indicated that the gene clusters involved in denitri-
fication were probably subject to shuffling by endog-
enous gene displacement or by horizontal gene transfer
between bacteria.
The advantage of using sequence-driven screening is
that it is not dependent on expression of cloned genes in
foreign hosts. Additionally, well-established techniques,
such as PCR or hybridization, can be employed for differ-
ent targets when using these metagenomic approaches.
On the other hand, the sequence-driven approach
involves designing DNA probes and primers derived from
conserved regions of known gene or protein families.
Various software (e.g. Edgar, 2004; Ludwig et al., 2004;
Zhang et al., 2007) and databases (e.g. FunGene, http://
fungene.cme.msu.edu/index.spr) can help to develop
effective screening strategies.
Targeted metagenomics based on
functional-driven screening
As an alternative to phylogenetic markers, the use of
known gene functions of interest is a more direct route to
the discovery of gene clusters with related metabolic roles
in microbial communities. Furthermore, function-driven
screening strategies can potentially provide a means to
reveal undiscovered genes or gene families that cannot
be detected by sequence-driven approaches, althoughspecific screening systems are often required.
Simple and certain activity-based strategies, such as
colony growth in the presence of antibiotics on agar
media, have often been used. Ten clones resistant to
tetracycline were identified from a bacterial artificial
chromosome (BAC) library (Kazimierczak et al., 2009)
and three clones resistant to bleomycin were identified
from a fosmid library (Mori et al., 2008). Both metage-
nomic libraries were constructed using DNA collected
from antibiotic-free environments (i.e. faecal samples of
organically reared adult pigs and activated sludge treat-
ing for coke-plant wastewater respectively). Most of the
genes resided on putative mobile genetic elements,
which presumably contribute to the maintenance and
dissemination of antibiotic resistance in even antibiotic-
free environments.
The diversity of the major rumen enzymes has
been characterized by an activity-based metagenomics
approach (Ferrer et al., 2005). The rumen habitat
consists mostly of obligate anaerobic microorganisms,
including fungi, protozoa, bacteria and archaea. Bacte-
rial and fungal components of this ecosystem are
responsible for the rapid degradation of plant polymers
(Tajima et al., 1999; Ramsak et al., 2000). A metage-
nomic phage library from the rumen content of a dairycow was screened for hydrolase activity directly on
agar medium. In total, 22 clones with distinct hydrolytic
activities were identified and characterized. Among
them, four hydrolases exhibited no sequence similarity
to enzymes from public databases and four clones did
not match any putative catalytic residues involved in the
catalytic function of esterase and cellulose-like enzymes.
These results suggest that function-based screening
of metagenomic libraries facilitates the functional
Targeted metagenomics 17
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
http://fungene.cme.msu.edu/index.sprhttp://fungene.cme.msu.edu/index.sprhttp://fungene.cme.msu.edu/index.sprhttp://fungene.cme.msu.edu/index.spr7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
6/10
assignment of many properties that have been classified
as hypothetical proteins.
In many cases, prokaryotic phenotypes are the result of
the concerted expression of many genes that are often
arranged into adjacent operons or super-operonic clus-
ters. Thus, the entire gene set of a pathway of interest can
be captured by targeting the central or essential gene in
that metabolic pathway.
The ability to use various aromatic compounds as
sources of carbon and energy is widespread in bacteria.
In the natural environment, these bacteria contribute
greatly to the breakdown of aromatic compounds and to
the global carbon cycle (Esteve-Nez et al., 2001;
Furukawa et al., 2004). Among the enzymes that degrade
aromatic compounds, extradiol dioxygenases (EDOs)
catalyse ring cleavage of catecholic compounds to
produce yellow meta-cleavage compounds (Eltis and
Bolin, 1996). Metagenomic DNA extracted from activated
sludge for industrial wastewater was cloned into fosmids
(Suenaga et al., 2007). The resulting E. coli library wasscreened for EDO activity using catechol as a substrate
and 38 clones were subjected to sequence analysis
(Suenaga et al., 2009a,b). As a result, various types of
gene subsets were identified that were not similar to pre-
viously reported pathways that complete degradation. The
distribution of these genes among the different genome
segments was reported in some isolated sphingomonads
(Miller et al., 2010) or rhodococcal (McLeod et al., 2006)
strains. The metagenomic data revealed that the com-
plete degradation pathways identified in many isolated
bacteria were, in fact, rare. Additionally, through in silico
assembly of the inserts from several fosmid clones, a
meta-plasmid designated as pSKYE1 was reconstructed.
Plasmid pSKYE1 seems to act as a detoxification appa-
ratus that may confer survival capabilities to its bacterial
host in the microbial community. Thus, targeted metage-
nomic approaches based on functional-driven screening
can be used to obtain novel findings of targeted biological
functions.
Other targeted metagenomics studies
The pre-treatment of a collected environmental sample
before DNA extraction for the enrichment of target genes
is also effective in targeted metagenomics. Stable-isotopeprobing (SIP) allows the simultaneous recovery of
labelled DNA from active target microorganisms that play
a particular function in the environment (Radajewski et al.,
2000; Wellington et al., 2003). These collected DNAs
have often been directly subjected to PCR amplification of
rRNA genes to taxonomically identify microorganisms that
feed on the labelled substrate. Recently, the combination
of SIP with shotgun sequencing was used to determine a
complete pmoCABoperon encoding the three subunits of
a particular methane monooxygenase (Stolyar et al.,
1999). PmoCAB is a key enzyme involved in the methane
utilization pathway of aerobic methanotrophs, a subgroup
of the methylotrophs (Dumont et al., 2006). A metage-
nomic BAC clone library was constructed with 13C-DNA
from a 13CH4-labelled forest soil sample. After colony
hybridization and subsequent sequence determination,
one clone was found to contain the pmoCAB operon.
Although methanotrophs were detected in this study, they
usually are not the dominant group of microorganisms in
soils and would have been missed by a random metage-
nome shotgun method. More recently, the nearly com-
plete genome of a novel methylotroph Methylotenera
mobilis, which comprises less than 0.4% of the total bac-
terial population in the sampled environment, was deter-
mined by using SIP followed by shotgun sequencing
(Kalyuzhnaya et al., 2008). Methylotrophy, the metabo-
lism of organic compounds containing no carboncarbon
bonds (i.e. C1 compounds) such as methane, methanol
and methylated amines, is an important component ofthe global carbon cycle (Hanson and Hanson, 1996).
Genome analysis of methylotrophs will expand our
current knowledge of the microbial metabolisms of the C1
compound in environment.
An enrichment procedure was also performed for the
mass collection of environmental magnetotactic bacteria
(MTB) virtually free of non-magnetic contaminants
(Jogler et al., 2009). MTB synthesize magnetosomes,
which are membrane-enclosed organelles consisting of
magnetite (Fe3O4) crystals or, less commonly, greigite
(Fe3S4) (Bazylinski and Frankel, 2004). MTB do not form
a coherent phylogenetic group, but the trait of magneto-
taxis is found in species within different phylogenetic
clades, which are mostly unavailable in pure culture
(Faivre and Schler, 2008). The selective cloning of
larger DNA fragments from magnetotactic metagenomes
was achieved by a two-step magnetic enrichment.
Sequence analysis of fosmid clones revealed that uncul-
tivated MTB exhibited similar, yet different, organizations
of the magnetosome island, which may account for the
diversity in biomineralization and magnetotaxis observed
in MTB from various environments.
Targeted metagenomics analyses based on pre-
treatment for enrichment of specific microorganisms or
genes can reveal relevant genome areas directly linked toan ecological function even in low abundance within a
metagenome.
Future aspects
The accumulation of data sets of microbial genes and
genomes in metagenomics is growing rapidly, but our
understanding of their functional and ecological relevance
is proceeding more slowly. Sequencing technology is
18 H. Suenaga
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
7/10
accelerating and third-generation sequencers that will
enable reading of the DNA sequence of a single chromo-
some in a single pass with few or no fragments will
likely be established in the near future (Clarke et al., 2009;
Eid et al., 2009). One of the most serious problems
with metagenomics methods using second-generation
sequencing technology related to fragment assembly
may be solved by using these long-read sequencing
technologies.
However, the other serious problem related to gene
prediction and annotation remains unsolved. Current
functional assignment for genes from metagenomes is
based on homology searches using BLAST tools (Altschul
et al., 1990) that depend heavily on the quality and
completeness of current databases. Homology-based
methods are effective only when the information of the
reference sequences is accurate. Actually, a number of
genomes in the current databases contain misannota-
tions (Schnoes et al., 2009). Furthermore, this method
is not sensitive, particularly for genomes that lacksequence relatives, and can miss novel genes that may
potentially be the most interesting. A review of prokary-
otic protein diversity in different shotgun metagenome
studies indicated that 3060% of the proteins cannot be
assigned to known functions using current public data-
bases (Vieites et al., 2009). Many hypothetical proteins
that have been identified may be ecologically important.
Targeted metagenomics, based on function-driven
screening, can reveal specific genome sequences
directly linking an ecological function although the ORF
lacks sequence homology to known genes and is iden-
tified as a hypothetical protein in current databases.
Furthermore, the functions of genes located in the neigh-
bourhood of the target genes would also be revealed by
complete sequence analysis of the inserts. This was sup-
ported by the observation that intergenic distances tend
to be shorter between genes of the same operon than
between operons (Salgado et al., 2000) and neighbour-
ing ORFs are more likely to be functionally associated
(Overbeek et al., 1999; Korbel et al. 2004). Time series
studies at one site are also being used to investigate
how microorganisms and their activities co-vary with
environmental changes. The transition of metadata,
which contains various environmental measurements as
well as metagenomic sequence data, will help to predictthe key genes for crucial environmental processes and to
understand the variability of microbial genomes in the
process of adaptive evolution.
Sequence data of metagenomics tell us what is there
and what it is capable of doing. What it is actually doing
is revealed by evaluating transcription (mRNA) and trans-
lation (protein) data. The correlation between specific
gene expression patterns and changes in community
composition or the functional property of the microbial
ecosystem can be addressed more directly by applying
these omics approaches (Benndorf et al., 2007; Maron
et al., 2007; Shrestha et al., 2009). The combined analy-
sis of targeted metagenomics with targeted metatran-
scriptomics or metaproteomics has the potential to
provide a novel perspective on microbial community
dynamics.
In this review, the targeted metagenomics approaches
based on the screening step are mainly presented. Selec-
tive DNA collection from the environment also seems to
be efficient for targeted metagenomics approaches. For
example, plasmids represent a comparatively uncharac-
terized metagenomic space and they frequently carry
useful genes for their host such as those involved in
biodegradation and metal or antibiotic resistance. Total
plasmid DNA can be targeted as a metamobilome study.
In the near future, it will be possible to develop targeted
metagenomics methodologies with improved experimen-
tal techniques such as environmental sampling, DNA
extraction, cloning as well as library screening.
References
Acinas, S.G., Klepac-Ceraj, V., Hunt, D.E., Pharino, C., Ceraj,
I., Distel, D.L., and Polz, M.F. (2004) Fine-scale phyloge-
netic architecture of a complex bacterial community.
Nature 430: 551554.
Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman,
D.J. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol
215: 403410.
Ash, C., Farrow, J.A.E., Dorsch, M., Stackebrandt, E., and
Collins, M.D. (1991) Comparative analysis of Bacillus
anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis
of reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. Int J
Syst Bacteriol 41: 343346.
Bazylinski, D.A., and Frankel, R.B. (2004) Magnetosome for-
mation in prokaryotes. Nat Rev Microbiol2: 217230.
Benndorf, D., Balcke, G.U., Harms, H., and von Bergen, M.
(2007) Functional metaproteome analysis of protein
extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. ISME J
1: 224234.
Biddle, J.F., Fitz-Gibbon, S., Schuster, S.C., Brenchley, J.E.,
and House, C.H. (2008) Metagenomic signatures of the
Peru Margin subseafloor biosphere show a genetically dis-
tinct environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 10583
10588.
Binnerup, S., Ferrari, B.C., Winsley, T., and Gillings, M.
(2008) Cultivating previously uncultured soil bacteria using
a soil substrate membrane system. Nat Protoc 3: 1261
1269.
Brulc, J.M., Antonopoulos, D.A., Berg Miller, M.E., Melissa,
K., Wilson, M.K., and Yannarell, A.C., et al. (2009) Gene-
centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen
microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19481953.
Chen, K., and Pachter, L. (2005) Bioinformatics for whole-
genome shotgun sequencing of microbial communities.
PLoS Comput Biol 1: e24.
Targeted metagenomics 19
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
8/10
Clarke, J., Wu, H.C., Jayasinghe, L., Patel, A., Reid, S., and
Bayley, H. (2009) Continuous base identification for single-
molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol 4:
265270.
Cox-Foster, D.L., Conlan, S., Holmes, E.C., Palacios, G.,
Evans, J.D., and Moran, N.A., et al. (2007) A metagenomic
survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder.
Science 318: 283287.
DeLong, E.F., Preston, C.M., Mincer, T., Rich, V., Hallam,
S.J., and Frigaard, N.-U., et al. (2006) Community genom-
ics among stratified microbial assemblages in the oceans
interior. Science 311: 496503.
Demanche, S., Philippot, L., David, M.M., Navarro, E.,
Vogel, T.M., and Simonet, P. (2009) Characterization of
denitrification gene clusters of soil bacteria via a metage-
nomic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 534537.
Dumont, M.G., Radajewski, S.M., Miguez, C.B., McDonald,
I.R., and Murrell, J.C. (2006) Identification of a complete
methane monooxygenase operon from soil by combining
stable isotope probing and metagenomic analysis. Environ
Microbiol 8: 12401250.
Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment
with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res32: 17921797.
Edwards, R.A., Rodriguez-Brito, B., Wegley, L., Haynes, M.,
Breitbart, M., Dean, M., and Peterson, D.M., et al. (2006)
Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial
ecology. BMC Genomics 7: 5770.
Eid, J., Fehr, A., Gray, J., Luong, K., Lyle, J., and Otto, G.,
et al. (2009) Real-time DNA sequencing from single poly-
merase molecules. Science 323: 133138.
Eltis, L.D., and Bolin, J.T. (1996) Evolutionary relationships
among extradiol dioxygenases. J Bacteriol 178: 5930
5937.
Esteve-Nez, A., Caballero, A., and Ramos, J.L. (2001)
Biological degradation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Microbiol
Mol Biol Rev 65: 335352.Faivre, D., and Schler, D. (2008) Magnetotactic bacteria and
magnetosomes. Chem Rev 108: 48754898.
Ferrer, M., Golyshina, O.V., Chernikova, T.N., Khachane,
A.N., Reyes-Duarte, D., and Santos, V.A., et al. (2005)
Novel hydrolase diversity retrieved from a metagenome
library of bovine rumen microflora. Environ Microbiol 7:
19962010.
Fuhrman, J.A., and Azam, F. (1980) Bacterioplankton sec-
ondary production estimates for coastal waters of British
Columbia, Antarctica, and California. Appl Environ Micro-
biol 39: 10851095.
Furukawa, K., Suenaga, H., and Goto, M. (2004) Biphenyl
dioxygenase: functional versatilities and directed evolution.
J Bacteriol 186: 51895196.Gilbert, J.A., Muhling, M., and Joint, I. (2008) A rare SAR11
fosmid clone confirming genetic variability in the Candida-
tus Pelagibacter ubique genome. ISME J 2: 790793.
Gill, S.R., Pop, M., DeBoy, R.T., Eckburg, P.B., Turnbaugh,
P.J., and Samuel, B.S., et al. (2006) Metagenomic analysis
of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312: 1355
1359.
Ginolhac, A., Jarrin, C., Gillet, B., Robe, P., Pujic, P., and
Tuphile, K., et al. (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of
polyketide synthase I domains from soil metagenomic
libraries allows selection of promising clones. Appl Environ
Microbiol 70: 55225527.
Grzymski, J.J., Carter, B.J., DeLong, E.F., Feldman, R.A.,
Ghadiri, A., and Murray, A.E. (2006) Comparative genom-
ics of DNA fragments from six Antarctic marine planktonic
bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 15321541.
Handelsman, J., Rondon, M.R., Brady, S.F., Clardy, J., and
Goodman, R.M. (1998) Molecular biological access to the
chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for
natural products. Chem Biol 5: 245249.
Hanson, R.S., and Hanson, T.E. (1996) Methanotrophic bac-
teria. Microbiol Rev 60: 439471.
Harismendy, O., Ng, P., Strausberg, R., Wang, X., Stockwell,
T., and Beeson, K.Y., et al. (2009) Evaluation of next gen-
eration sequencing platforms for population targeted
sequencing studies. Genome Biol 10: R32.
Hoff, K.J. (2009) The effect of sequencing errors on metage-
nomic gene prediction. BMC Genomics 10: 520.
Jaspers, E., and Overmann, J. (2004) Ecological significance
of microdiversity: identical 16S rRNA gene sequences can
be found in bacteria with highly divergent genomes and
ecophysiologies. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 48314839.
Jogler, C., Lin, W., Meyerdierks, A., Kube, M., Katzmann, E.,Flies, C., et al. (2009) Toward cloning of the magnetotactic
metagenome: identification of magnetosome island gene
clusters in uncultivated magnetotactic bacteria from differ-
ent aquatic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 3972
3979.
Jrgensen, B.B. (1982) Mineralization of organic matter in
the sea bed the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296:
643645.
Kalyuzhnaya, M.G., Lapidus, A., Ivanova, N., Copeland,
A.C., McHardy, A.C., Szeto, E., et al. (2008) High-
resolution metagenomics targets specific functional types
in complex microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol 26:
10291034.
Kazimierczak, K.A., Scott, K.P., Kelly, D., and Aminov, R.I.(2009) Tetracycline resistome of the organic pig gut. Appl
Environ Microbiol 75: 17171722.
Korbel, J.O., Jensen, L.J., von Mering, C., and Bork, P. (2004)
Analysis of genomic context: prediction of functional asso-
ciations from conserved bidirectionally transcribed gene
pairs. Nat Biotechnol 22: 911917.
Llobet-Brossa, E., Rossell-Mora, R., and Amann, R. (1998)
Microbial community composition of Wadden Sea sedi-
ments as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 26912696.
Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R., Richter, L., Meier, H.,
Yadhukumar, et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for
sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 13631371.
McLeod, M.P., Warren, R.L., Hsiao, W.W., Araki, N., Myhre,M., Fernandes, C., et al. (2006) The complete genome of
Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic
powerhouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1558215587.
Mardis, E.R. (2008) The impact of next-generation sequenc-
ing technology on genetics. Trends Genet 24: 142149.
Maron, P.A., Ranjard, L., Mougel, C., and Lemanceau, P.
(2007) Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying func-
tional microbial ecology. Microb Ecol 53: 486493.
Marshall, P., and Lemieux, C. (1992) The I-CeuI endonu-
clease recognizes a sequence of 19 base pairs and pref-
20 H. Suenaga
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
9/10
erentially cleaves the coding strand of the Chlamydomonas
moewusii chloroplast large subunit rRNA gene. Nucleic
Acids Res 20: 64016407.
Methe, B.A., Nelson, K.E., Deming, J.W., Momen, B.,
Melamud, E., Zhang, X., et al. (2005) The psychrophilic
lifestyle as revealed by the genome sequence of Colwellia
psychrerythraea 34H through genomic and proteomic
analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1091310918.
Miller, T.R., Delcher, A.L., Salzberg, S.L., Saunders, E.,
Detter, J.C., and Halden, R.U. (2010) Genome sequence
of the dioxin-mineralizing bacterium Sphingomonas wit-
tichii RW1. J Bacteriol 192: 61016102.
Mori, T., Mizuta, S., Suenaga, H., and Miyazaki, K. (2008)
Metagenomic screening for bleomycin resistance genes.
Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 68036805.
Mussmann, M., Richter, M., Lombardot, T., Meyerdierks, A.,
Kuever, J., Kube, M., et al. (2005) Clustered genes related
to sulfate respiration in uncultured prokaryotes support the
theory of their concomitant horizontal transfer. J Bacteriol
187: 71267137.
Nesb, C.L., Boucher, Y., Dlutek, M., and Doolittle, W.F.
(2005) Lateral gene transfer and phylogenetic assignment
of environmental fosmid clones. Environ Microbiol7: 20112026.
Neufeld, J.D., Chen, Y., Dumont, M.G., and Murrell, J.C.
(2008) Marine methylotrophs revealed by stable-isotope
probing, multiple displacement amplification and metage-
nomics. Environ Microbiol 10: 15261535.
Nichols, D., Cahoon, N., Trakhtenberg, E.M., Pham, L.,
Mehta, A., Belanger, A., et al. (2010) Use of ichip for high-
throughput in situ cultivation of uncultivable microbial
species. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 24452450.
Olsen, G.J., Lane, D.J., Giovannoni, S.J., Pace, N.R.,
and Stahl, D.A. (1986) Microbial ecology and evolution: a
ribosomal RNA approach. Annu Rev Microbiol 40: 337
365.
Overbeek, R., Fonstein, M., DSouza, M., Pusch, G.D., andMaltsev, N. (1999) The use of gene clusters to infer func-
tional coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 28962901.
Palenik, B., Ren, Q., Tai, V., and Paulsen, I.T. (2009) Coastal
Synechococcus metagenome reveals major roles for hori-
zontal gene transfer and plasmids in population diversity.
Environ Microbiol 11: 349359.
Perna, N.T., Plunkett, G., III, Burland, V., Mau, B., Glasner,
J.D., Rose, D.J., et al. (2001) Genome sequence of entero-
haemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 : H7. Nature 409:
529533.
Radajewski, S., Ineson, P., Parekh, N.R., and Murrell, J.C.
(2000) Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial
ecology. Nature 403: 646649.
Ramsak, A., Peterka, M., Tajima, K., Martin, J.C., Wood, J.,Johnston, M.E., et al. (2000) Unravelling the genetic diver-
sity of ruminal bacteria belonging to the CFB phylum.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33: 6979.
Riesenfeld, C.S., Schloss, P.D., and Handelsman, J. (2004)
Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communi-
ties. Annu Rev Genet 38: 525552.
Rusch, A., Huettel, M., Reimers, C.E., Taghon, G.L., and
Fuller, C.M. (2003) Activity and distribution of bacterial
populations in middle Atlantic bight shelf sands. FEMS
Microbiol Ecol 44: 89100.
Sait, M., Hugenholtz, P., and Janssen, P.H. (2002) Cultivation
of globally-distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lin-
eages previously only detected in cultivation-independent
surveys. Environ Microbiol 4: 654666.
Salgado, H., Moreno-Hagelsieb, G., Smith, T.F., and Collado-
Vides, J. (2000) Operons in Escherichia coli: genomic
analyses and predictions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:
66526657.
Saunders, N.F.W., Thomas, T., Curmi, P.M.G., Mattick, J.S.,
Kuczek, E., Slade, R., et al. (2003) Mechanisms of thermal
adaptation revealed from the genomes of the Antarctic
archaea Methanogenium frigidum and Methanococcoides
burtonii. Genome Res 13: 15801588.
Schnoes, A.M., Brown, S.D., Dodevski, I., and Babbitt, P.C.
(2009) Annotation error in public databases: misannotation
of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS
Comput Biol 5: e1000605.
Shen, Y.A., Buick, R., and Canfield, D.E. (2001) Isotopic
evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early
Archaean era. Nature 410: 7781.
Shendure, J., and Ji, H. (2008) Next-generation DNA
sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26: 11351145.
Shrestha, P.M., Kube, M., Reinhardt, R., and Liesack, W.(2009) Transcriptional activity of paddy soil bacterial com-
munities. Environ Microbiol 11: 960970.
Stevenson, B.S., Eichorst, S.A., Wertz, J.T., Schmidt, T.M.,
and Breznak, J.A. (2004) New strategies for cultivation and
detection of previously uncultured microbes. Appl Environ
Microbiol 70: 47484755.
Stolyar, S., Costello, A.M., Peeples, T.L., and Lidstrom, M.E.
(1999) Role of multiple gene copies in particulate methane
monooxygenase activity in the methane-oxidizing bacte-
rium Methylococcus capsulatus Bath. Microbiology 145:
12351244.
Streit, W.R., and Schmitz, R.A. (2004) Metagenomics the
key to the uncultured microbes. Curr Opin Microbiol 7:
492498.Suenaga, H., Ohnuki, T., and Miyazaki, K. (2007) Functional
screening of a metagenomic library for genes involved in
microbial degradation of aromatic compounds. Environ
Microbiol 9: 22892297.
Suenaga, H., Koyama, Y., Miyakoshi, M., Miyazaki, R., Yano,
H., Sota, M., et al. (2009a) Novel organization of aromatic
degradation pathway genes in a microbial community as
revealed by metagenomic analysis. ISME J3: 13351348.
Suenaga, H., Mizuta, S., and Miyazaki, K. (2009b) The
molecular basis for adaptive evolution in novel extradiol
dioxygenases retrieved from the metagenome. FEMS
Microbiol Ecol 69: 472480.
Tajima, K., Aminov, R.I., Nagamine, T., Ogata, K., Nakamura,
M., Matsui, H., and Benno, Y. (1999) Rumen bacterialdiversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA
libraries. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29: 159169.
Turnbaugh, P.J., Ley, R.E., Mahowald, M.A., Magrini, V.,
Mardis, E.R., and Gordon, J.I. (2006) An obesity-
associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for
energy harvest. Nature 444: 10271031.
Tyson, G.W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E.E., Ram,
R.J., Richardson, P.M., et al. (2004) Community structure
and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial
genomes from the environment. Nature 428: 3743.
Targeted metagenomics 21
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322
7/27/2019 Targeted Metagenomics
10/10
Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L.,
Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., et al. (2004) Environmental genome
shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304:
6674.
Vieites, J.M., Guazzaroni, M.-E., Beloqui, A., Golyshin, P.N.,
and Ferrer, M. (2009) Metagenomics approaches in
systems microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 236255.
Wegley, L., Edwards, R., Rodriguez-Brito, B., Liu, H., and
Rohwer, F. (2007) Metagenomic analysis of the microbial
community associated with the coral Porites astreoides.
Environ Microbiol 9: 27072719.
Wellington, E.M.H., Berry, A., and Krsek, M. (2003) Resolving
functional diversity in relation to microbial community struc-
ture in soil: exploiting genomics and stable isotope probing.
Curr Opin Microbiol 6: 295301.
Woebken, D., Teeling, H., Wecker, P., Dumitriu, A.,
Kostadinov, I., DeLong, E.F., et al. (2007) Fosmids of novel
marine Planctomycetes from the Namibian and Oregon
coast upwelling systems and their cross-comparison with
planctomycete genomes. ISME J 1: 419435.
Wommack, K.E., Bhavsar, J., and Ravel, J. (2008) Metage-
nomics: read length matters. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:
14531463.
Wooley, J.C., Godzik, A., and Friedberg, I. (2010) A primer on
metagenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000667.
Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rapp, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E.J.,
and Keller, M. (2002) Cultivating the uncultured. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 99: 1568115686.
Zhang, S.W., Zhang, Y.L., Pan, Q., Cheng, Y.M., and Chou,
K.C. (2007) Estimating residue evolutionary conservation
by introducing von Neumann entropy and a novel gap-
treating approach. Amino Acids 35: 495501.
22 H. Suenaga
2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Environmental Microbiology, 14, 1322