Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    1/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 1/18

    Cookies onInvasive Species

    Compendium

    Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience

    possible.

    Continuing to use www.cabi.org means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you

    can learn more about the cookies we use.

    Close

    Find out more

    Datasheet

    Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    Index

    Pictures

    Identity

    Summary of Invasiveness

    Taxonomic Tree

    Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

    Description

    Distribution

    Distribution Table

    History of Introduction and Spread

    Introductions

    Risk of Introduction

    Habitat

    Habitat List

    Hosts/Species Affected

    Host Plants/Plants Affected

    Growth Stages

    Symptoms

    Symptoms List

    Biology and Ecology

    Climate

    Air Temperature

    Rainfall

    Pathway Causes

    Pathway Vectors

    Plant Trade

    Impact Summary

    Economic Impact

    Environmental Impact

    Social Impact

    Risk and Impact Factors

    Uses List

    Diagnosis

    Detection and Inspection

    Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

    Prevention and Control

    Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs

    References

    Links to Websites

    Contributors

    Distribution Maps

    Last modified

    08 January 2016

    Datasheet Type(s)

    Invasive Species

    Pest

    Natural Enemy

    Preferred Scientific Na me

    Tapinoma melanocephalum

    Preferred Common Name

    ghost ant

    Taxonomic Tree

    Domain: Eukaryota

      Kingdom: Metazoa

      Phylum: Arthropoda

      Subphylum: Uniramia

      Class: Insecta

    Summary of Invasiveness

    T. melanocephalum is a small ant

    species around 1.5 mm in length

    originating from the Old World

    tropics. It is considered an invasive

    and “tramp” ant species: widely

    associated with humans, it has been

    moved around the subtropical and

    tropical wor...

    More...

    More information

    More information

    Summary

    Generate report

    Don't need the entire report?

    Generate a print friendly version containing only the sections you need.

    Search

    Advanced Bibliographic Search Advanced Datasheet Search

    Search  over 9,000 Datasheets and over 170,000 Abstracts

    Enter   keyword or phrase   Filter by type

    Search Invasive Species Compendium   Smart searches   My ISC

    Datasheets   Abstracts Full Text Library Glossary More Resources

    Invasive Species CompendiumDatasheets, maps, images, abstracts and full text oninvasive species of the world

    Home Overview About Help Contact MobileOther CABI sites

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=12&rows=10&sort=AtoZhttp://www.cabi.org/isc/more-resources/http://-/?-http://www.cabi.org/isc/contact-us/http://www.cabi.org/isc/help/http://www.cabi.org/isc/about/http://www.cabi.org/isc/overview/http://www.cabi.org/isc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/more-resources/http://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=12&rows=10&sort=AtoZhttp://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=11&rows=10&sort=DateDeschttp://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=4&rows=10&sort=DateDeschttp://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=1&rows=10&sort=DateDeschttp://www.cabi.org/isc/search/?q=&types=7,19&sort=DateDeschttp://www.cabi.org/isc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/myisc/http://www.cabi.org/isc/advanceddatasheetsearch/http://www.cabi.org/isc/advancedbibliographicsearch/http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheetreport/54310http://www.cabi.org/cookie-information/

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    2/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 2/18

    Pictures

    Picture Title Caption Copyright

     Adults Tapinoma melanoceph alum; adu lt ants o n flower petals in Fiji. Philip J. Lester 

     Adult Tapinoma melanoceph alum; close-u p of adult o n flower petals in Fiji. Philip J. Lester 

    Top of page

    Identity

    Preferred Scientific Name

    Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793)

    Preferred Common Name

    ghost ant

    Other Scientific Names

    Formica familiaris F. Smith 1860

    Formica melanocephalum Fabricius 1793

    Formica nana Jerdon

    Myrmica (Monomorium) pellucida F. Smith 1857

    Tapinoma melanocephalum var. australe Santschi 1928

    Tapinoma melanocephalum var. australis Santschi 1928

    International Common Names

    English:  tramp ant

    Local Common Names

    Cuba:  hormiga bottegaria

    Japan:  awate-konuka-ari

    Puerto Rico:  albaricoque

    USA:  black-headed ant; house infesting ant; tiny yellow house ant

    EPPO code

    TAPIME ( Tapinoma melanocephalum)

    Top of page

    Summary of Invasiveness

    T. melanocephalum is a small ant species around 1.5 mm in length originating from the Old World tropics. It is considered an invasive and

    “tramp” ant species: widely associated with humans, it has been moved around the subtropical and tropical world by human activity. This ant is

    also recorded in heated buildings in areas such as Canada and Finland. It is primarily a household pest, nesting in housing and consuming

    household food. In areas such as Florida it is considered one of the most important house-infesting pests. However it has been known to affect

    agricultural production in situations such as greenhouses, especially if it tends honeydew-producing insects and protects these pests from

    biological control organisms. T. melanocephalum is thought to be capable of transporting pathogenic microbes and is often abundant in

    hospitals. Some people can suffer a slight, red irritation of the skin following contact with this ant. This ant is listed on the ISSG global invasive

    species database.

    Top of page

    Taxonomic Tree   Top of page

    Domain: Eukaryota

      Kingdom: Metazoa

      Phylum: Arthropoda

      Subphylum: Uniramia

      Class: Insecta

      Order: Hymenoptera

      Family: Formicidae

      Genus: Tapinoma

      Species: Tapinoma melanocephalum

    Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature

    This ant was originally described as Formica melanocephalum  by Fabricius in 1793. This name was changed in 1857 to Myrmica pellucida  after 

    F. Smith was given collections from Asia by the famous A.R. Wallace; Smith gave the same ant a second genus and species name of Formica

    familiaris  in 1860. Around this time it was also given the name Formica nana by T.C. Jerdon after collecting it in southern India. There are 63

    ant species in the genus Tapinoma. The only other significant and relatively widespread pest species amongst these is Tapinoma sessile (Say)

    or the “odorous house ant”.

    Top of page

    http://-/?-http://-/?-

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    3/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 3/18

    Some authors have considered “varieties” or “sub-species” of T. melanocephalum to exist. Two early attempts at describing varieties were

    Tapinoma (Micromyrma) melanocephalum  var. australe Santschi and Tapinoma (Micromyrma) melanocephalum var. australis Santschi, but

    these have been subsequently considered invalid names. Current possible sub-species names occasionally used are Tapinoma

    melanocephalum var. coronatum  Forel, and Tapinoma melanocephalum var. malesianum  Forel. It remains to be determined how appropriate

    these sub-species designations are; opinions vary substantially amongst taxonomists.

    Description

     A gener al description suitable fo r quarantine purposes is given by Harris et al. (2005), and is summarized here.

     As opposed to other invasive an ts, T. melanocephalum  is monomorphic with an average total length around 1.5 mm, ranging between 1.3 and

    1.9 mm. It is distinctively bicoloured (see pictures). The head (including antennae, except for first 2 segments), and sides of alitrunk (or upper 

    thorax) are blackish-brown; while the dorsal alitrunk (lower thorax) and legs are a pale yellow. The gaster (abdomen) is mostly pale, sometimes

    with brown patches.

     A mor e technical de scription suitable for quarantine purposes is a s follows. Antennae ar e 12-segmented. First antennal segment (scape) is

    long, surpassing the posterior border of head. Eyes are large, with 9-10 ommatidia in the longest row. Mandibles each have 3 large teeth and

    about 7 small denticles, with the mandible surface containing the teeth and that near the clypeus rounding gradually into one another (basal

    angle absent). The clypeus is without longitudinal carinae; with the anterior margin slightly concave in the alitrunk in profile and almost smoothly

    convex, but with a slight metanotal depression. The propodeum is without spines; the upper surface is shorter than the rear surface. One

    rudimentary node (petiole) is present, which lacks a distinct forward face and is partially or completely concealed when viewed from above by

    forward projection of the first segment of the gaster. The gaster has four segments on its upper surface. There is a dense fine pubescence all

    over the ant, with erect setae on clypeus and gastral apex only. Stinger and acidopore are absent.

    Top of page

    Distribution

    The native range of T. melanocephalum  is generally thought to be the Old World tropics (Deyrup et al., 2000). However, it has been spread by

    humans so widely that it is unclear if its native range is Africa or Asia (Wilson and Taylor, 1967). Molecular phylogenies need to be constructed

    to aid in the estimation of its native range. It is a prominent tramp species that has become widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical

    zones of the world, up to about 28°N and 23°S, and is often in close association with human settlement. It is also recorded in a number of 

    temperate locations where it is present (either temporarily or permanently) in heated buildings (e.g., Germany (Steinbrink, 1987), Canada

    (Francoeur, 1977), and Finland (Sorvari, 2002)). It would be unlikely to survive outside these buildings in these countries.

    Top of page

    Distribution Table

    The distribution in this summary table is based on all the information available. When several references are cited, they may give conflicting

    information on the status. Further details may be available for individual references in the Distribution Table Details section which can be

    selected by going to Generate Report.

    Country Distribution Last

    Reported

    Origin First

    Reported

    Invasive References Notes

    ASIA

    Bangladesh   Present   Wetterer, 2009

    Cambodia   Present   Wetterer, 2009

    China   Present Introduced 1921   Wetterer, 2009

    -Guizhou   Present   Zheng et al., 2007

    Christmas Island(Indian Ocean)

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Cocos Islands   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    India   Present   Wetterer, 2009;Lokeshwari et al., 2015

    -Indian Punjab   Present   Bharti & Singh, 2003

    Indonesia   Present   Wetterer, 2009

    Iraq   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Japan   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Korea, DPR   Present Introduced   ISSG, 2012

    Korea, Republic of    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Kuwait   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Malaysia

    -Peninsular Malaysia   Widespread Invasive   Loke & Lee, 2004   On Penang Island in universitydormitories

    Myanmar    Present   Wetterer, 2009

    Oman   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Pakistan   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Philippines   Widespread Invasive   Way et al., 1998   Present in rice fields

    Russian Federation

    -Russia (Asia)   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Saudi Arabia   Present Introduced   Collingwo od & Agosti,1996

    Singapore   Widespread Invasive   Lee & Kooi, 2004   Household and urban pest

    Sri Lanka   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Top of page

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108485http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108557http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108552http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108780http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108550http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108535http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108537http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108529http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108503http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108765http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108514http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108478http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108477http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108476http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108467http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108461http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108455http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108748http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108459http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108389http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108407http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108674http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108398http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108472http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108369

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    4/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 4/18

    Taiwan   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Thailand   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    United Arab Emirates   Present Introduced Invasive   Collingwo od et al., 1997   Common in houses in several towns

    Vietnam   Present   Wetterer, 2009

    Yemen   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    AFRICA

    Cameroon   Widespread Invasive   Dejean et al., 1994   Present in secondary rain forest

    Cape Verde   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Comoros   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Equatorial Guinea   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Gabon   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Gambia   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Ghana   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Guinea   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Kenya   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Madagascar    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Mauritius   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Nigeria   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Réunion   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Saint Helena   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Seychelles   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Sierra Leone   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Somalia   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Tanzania   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    NORTH AMERICA

    Canada

    -Manitoba   Present, few

    occurrences

    Introduced Not

    invasive

     Ayre, 1977   Only indoors

    -Ontario   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    -Quebec   Localised Introduced Notinvasive

    Francoeur, 1977   Records are only from within heatedbuildings

    Mexico   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    USA   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    -Florida   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Clouse, 1999   In agriculture

    -Hawaii   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Clagg, 1957

    -Kansas   Present Introduced   Dubois & Danoffburg, 1994   Cited as unlikely to survive Kansaswinters

    -Texas   Present Introduced   Cook et al., 1994

    CENTRAL AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN

     Anguilla   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

     Antigua an d Barbud a   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

     Aruba   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Bahamas   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Deyrup, 1994

    Barbados   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Belize   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Cayman Islands   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Costa Rica   Unconfirmedrecord

    Wetterer, 200 9; Shepard &Gibson, 1972

    Cuba   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Dominica   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Dominican Republic   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Guadeloupe   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Haiti   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Honduras   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Jamaica   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Martinique   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Nicaragua   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Panama   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Puerto Rico   Present Introduced   Smith, 1965   Associated with rotten coconuts andfeeding on insects

    Saint Kitts and Nevis   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Saint Lucia   Present Introduced Invasive   Wetterer, 2009; ISSG, 2012

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108600http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108483http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108475http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108541http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108530http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108521http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108506http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108465http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108451http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108453http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108441http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108414http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108413http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108405http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108402http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108479http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108387http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108368http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108382http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108363http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108352http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108353http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108838http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108811http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108806http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108804http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108597http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108513http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108663http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108661http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108655http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108388http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108591http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108565http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108562http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108554http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108558http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108546http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108520http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108510http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108498http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108470http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108440http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108436http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108439http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108430http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108442http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108474http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108406http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108397http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108609http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108604http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108350http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108580http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108590

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    5/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 5/18

    Saint Vincent and theGrenadines

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Trinidad and Tobago   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    United States VirginIslands

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    SOUTH AMERICA

    Brazil

    -Bahia   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Delabie et al., 1995   Pests within houses

    -Minas Gerais   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Rodovalho et al., 2007   A bacterial vector within hospitals

    -Rio Grande do Norte   Present Introduced Invasive   Morini et al., 2007

    -Sao Paulo   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Fowler et al., 1990   Associated with scale insects onbanana crops

    Colombia   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Ecuador 

    -Galapagos Islands   Present Introduced Invasive   Aesch & Cherix, 2005

    Guyana   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Paraguay   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Peru   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Suriname   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Venezuela   Present Introduced   Gomez-Nunez, 1971   Observed preying on a diseasespreading bug

    EUROPE

     Austria   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Belgium   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Czech Republic   Present   Klimes & Okrouhlík, 2015   Ceské Bude?jovice

    Denmark   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Finland   Present Introduced Notinvasive

    Sorvari, 2002   Only observed in heated buildings

    France   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Germany   Present Introduced Notinvasive Steinbrink, 1987   Present only in heated building s

    Italy   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Netherlands   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Norway   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Romania   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Russian Federation

    -Russia (Europe)   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Spain   Present Introduced   Collingwood, 1976

    Sweden   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Switzerland   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    UK   Present Introduced   Vipin Shah et al., 1999   In buildings

    OCEANIA

     American Samoa   Widespread Introduced   Vargo, 2000   Present in forest litter but dominatedby other ants

     Australia

    - Australian No rthernTerritory

    Present Introduced   Andersen & Reichel, 1994   Holmes Jungle, Tropic forest

    -New South Wales   Present Introduced   Shattuck & Barnett, 2001

    -Queensland   Present Introduced Invasive   Shattuck & Barnett, 2001

    -Western Australia   Present Introduced   Burbidge et al., 1992

    Cook Islands   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Fiji   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Ward & Wetterer, 2006   Throughout islands

    French Polynesia   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Wilson & Taylo r, 1967

    Kiribati   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Marshall Islands   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Micronesia, Federatedstates of 

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    New Caledonia   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Wilson & Taylo r, 1967

    New Zealand   Present   Peacock, 2012; Harris etal., 2005

    Northern Mariana

    Islands

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Palau   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Papua New Guinea   Present   Wetterer, 2009

    Pitcairn Island   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108608http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108540http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108534http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108543http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108505http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108528http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108517http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108427http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108499http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108473http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108533http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108425http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108395http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108625http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108621http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108620http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108619http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108362http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108360http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108431http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108393http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108556http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108421http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108784http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108550http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108548http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108523http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108522http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108464http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108410http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108429http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108424http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108412http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108409http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108370http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108361http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108601http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108568http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108532http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108544http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108448http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108700http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108416http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108399http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108651http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108645http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108636http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108630http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108381http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108603http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108588http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108600

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    6/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 6/18

    Samoa   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Wilson & Taylo r, 1967   In native forest, houses and bananaplantations

    Solomon Islands   Widespread Introduced   BROWN, 1959   In coconut plantations

    Tokelau   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Lester & Tavite, 2004   Primarily in and around houses

    Tonga   Widespread Introduced Invasive   Wilson & Taylo r, 1967

    US Minor OutlyingIslands

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Vanuatu   Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    Wallis and Futuna

    Islands

    Present Introduced   Wetterer, 2009

    History of Introduction and Spread

    T. melanocephalum  is a common tramp species frequently intercepted and spread through trade for well over a century. It spread to much of its

    introduced range well before people starting recording its introductions or worrying about ecological impacts. For example, Mayr (1876) records

    this ant in Tonga which is well outside of its assumed African or Oriental origin.

    Top of page

    Introductions

    Introduced

    to

    Introduced

    from

     Year Reas on Introduced

    by

    Established in wild through References Notes

    Naturalreproduction

    Continuousrestocking

    Florida 1930 Yes   Deyrup etal., 2000

    Unintentional

    Texas Florida 1994 Yes   Cook et al.,1994

    Unintentional. Probably arrived on a shipment of plants from Florida.

    Top of page

    Risk of Introduction

     All known introductions of this a nt have been unintentional. Because of the small size of T. melanocephalum  and its ability to nest in a variety of 

    materials (e.g., potted plants, cut flowers, and luggage), it can easily be transported from one location to another (Appel et al., 2004). Colonies

    have been found in a wide variety of situations, including cupboards, instrument case lining, and piles of discarded clothing (Harada, 1990),

    meaning that the ant is likely to be associated with a wide variety of freight types. Detailed introduction history information is available from

    areas such as New Zealand (Harris et al., 2005; Lester, 2005). T. melanocephalum  was intercepted at the New Zealand border 51 times

    between 1997 and the end of 2002, and a further 36 interceptions at the border between January 2003 and March 2004. Interceptions range

    from fresh produce to electronic equipment. The most prevalent pathways for this ant appear to be fresh produce (53%) and personal effects

    (17%), with the Pacific (75%), particularly Fiji and Tonga, being the predominant origin of interceptions into New Zealand. Interceptions from air 

    freight (> 39%) and associated with air passengers (> 29%) are particularly common for this ant (Harris et al., 2005).

    Top of page

    Habitat

    T. melanocephalum  appears extremely flexible in the habitats it occupies, although it often appears to need some form of disturbance to survive

    in the presence of behaviourally dominant species. It commonly nests in temporary or unstable habitats such as plant stems or clumps of dry

    grass (Passera, 1994). It has been sampled nesting at ground level and in trees. In the cooler temperate regions it is only associated with

    greenhouses and heated buildings (Smith, 1965; Francoeur, 1977).

    T. melanocephalum  appears to be a disturbance specialist and in many locations is absent from undisturbed natural habitat (e.g. Fowler et al.,

    1994; Deyrup et al., 2000). Where it does occur in natural or semi-natural disturbed vegetation or remnants, it appears to be a minor 

    component of the community and is never behaviourally or numerically dominant (e.g. Andersen and Reichel, 1994; Dejean et al., 1994; Way et

    al., 1998; Vargo, 2000; Lester and Tavite, 2004).

    Top of page

    Habitat List

    Category Habitat Presence Status

    Littoral Coastal areas Principal habitat Natural

    Other Stored products Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Terrestrial-managed Buildings Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Cultivated / agricultural land Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Disturbed areas Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Industrial / intensive livestock production systems Secondary/tolerated habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Ma na ged fo re sts, p lan ta tio ns a nd or ch ard s Pri nci pal h abi ta t Ha rmfu l (p est o r in va si ve )

    Protected agriculture (e.g. glasshouse production) Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Urban / peri-urban areas Principal habitat Harmful (pest or invasive)

    Terrestrial-natural/semi-natural Natural forests Secondary/tolerated habitat Natural

    Riverbanks Secondary/tolerated habitat Natural

    Rocky areas / lava flows Secondary/tolerated habitat Natural

    Scrub / shrublands Principal habitat Natural

    Top of page

    Hosts/Species Affected   Top of page

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108606http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108605http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108596http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108585http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108582http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108553http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/108608

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    7/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 7/18

    It is important to note that no reports were found of T. melanocephalum  being considered a significant pest of agriculture or horticulture. In

    crops it is considered a secondary pest: rather than being a pest itself, it can tend or farm mealybug, scale or aphid populations, protecting

    these pests from their natural enemies (Fowler et al., 1990; Appel et al., 2004). This protection can result in large herbivore populations. Unlike

    other invasive ants, however, the results of such tending behaviour in terms of economic damage have not been quantified. T. melanocephalum

    is also known to consume sugary foods in storage and nectar from plants.

    Host Plants/Plants Affected

    Family Plant name Context

     Arecaceae   Cocos nucifera (coconut)   Other 

    Musaceae   Musa (banana)   Other 

    Poaceae   Oryza (rice (generic level))   Other 

    Poaceae   Saccharum   Other 

    Top of page

    Growth Stages

    Fruiting stage, Post-harvest

    Top of page

    Symptoms

    In crops T. melanocephalum is considered a secondary pest: rather than being a pest itself, it can tend or farm mealybug, scale or aphid

    populations, protecting these pests from their natural enemies (Fowler et al., 1990; Appel et al., 2004). This protection can result in large

    herbivore populations. The specific effects and symptoms on each crop are dependent on the specific mealybug, scale or aphid species being

    tended.

    Top of page

    Symptoms List

    Sign Life Stages Type

    Fruit

    abnormal shape

    discoloration

    external feeding

    honeydew or sooty mould

    lesions: black or brown

    premature drop

    Growing point

    discoloration

    distortion

    external feeding

    honeydew or sooty mould

    wilt

    Leaves

    abnormal colours

    abnormal leaf fall

    external feeding

    fungal growth

    honeydew or sooty mould

    leaves rolled or folded

    necrotic areas

    wilting

    yellowed or dead

    Roots

    external feeding

    Stems

    discoloration of bark

    external feeding

    honeydew or sooty mould

    Whole plant

    discoloration

    early senescence

    plant dead; dieback

    wilt

    Top of page

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/48157http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/37958http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/35124http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/11788

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    8/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 8/18

    Biology and Ecology

    Reproductive Biology

    T. melanocephalum  has polygyne (multiple queened) and unicolonial (separate but cooperatively interacting nests) colonies that can build up

    large numbers (Smith, 1965). Nests are found in the soil, rotten wood, decaying parts of trees or under bark, in plant cavities, houses, and in

    greenhouses (Smith, 1965). In tropical environments the ants will primarily nest outdoors, in small protected areas, for example, in and under 

    potted plants, in dead tree limbs, under stones, in palm fronds, and in organic debris (Appel et al., 2004). Individual nests may contain 100-1000

    individuals (Harada, 1990) and have numerous reproductive females. New colonies are probably formed by the migration of one or more

    reproductive females accompanied by a number of workers. Nuptial flights have not been reported for this T. melanocephalum. Almost no

    infighting between members of different colonies or nests has been observed, at least when they originate from the same area (Bustos and

    Cherix, 1998). Colonies are almost always in disturbed areas and in and around buildings in Florida (Deyrup et al., 2000). They often occupy

    temporary habitats (plant stems, clumps of dried grass, debris) and readily migrate if disturbed or if conditions become unfavourable (Passera,

    1994).

    Massuretti de Jesus and Correa Bueno (2007) have recently examined the phenology of T. melanocephalum  in some detail. T.

    melanocephalum  have four larval instars from egg-hatching to adult. The development of workers from egg to adult lasted 16-52 days with the

    embryonic development longer than larval, prepupal or pupal stages. The highest egg production was 5.3 eggs/day/queen, which is relatively

    slow compared to other ant species. However, due to the number of queens in a colony, the colonies may grow substantially faster than other 

    tramp ant species.

    Nutrition

    The ants have an omnivorous diet typical of many tramp and pest ant species. In Puerto Rico, Pimentel (1955) observed worker ants destroying

    eggs and first-stage larvae of the housefly Musca domestica. Other arthropods that they have been observed to consume are diamondback

    moth larvae in India (Chelliah and Srinivasan, 1986), a disease-spreading bug in Venezuela (Gomez-Nunez, 1971), two-spotted spider mites

    (Tetranychus urticae) and aphids in glasshouses in Florida (Osborne et al., 1995), western flower thrips and Ecinothrips americanus  (Osborne

    et al., 1995), and flea eggs and larvae (Tamsitt and Fox, 1966). T. melanocephalum  has been frequently observed to tend honeydew producing

    homopterans (Appel et al., 2004), including root scales (Smith, 1955) and fruit scales on bananas (Fowler et al., 1990). In Cuba, they are known

    to disperse a grass root mealybug on the roots of sugarcane (Smith, 1965). Although the ants feed upon many different household foods, they

    seem to show a preference for sweets, having been observed feeding on sugar, cakes, and syrup. They are thus considered an important

    house pest (Smith, 1955; Klotz et al., 1995).

    Associations

     As repor ted above, there are a variety of aphids, scale and mealybug insects ten ded by and associated with T. melanocephalum. Shepard and

    Gibson (1972) reported an association between T. melanocephalum  and a salticid spider (Continusa  sp.) that resembles the ant. The spider builds silken retreats at the periphery of nests, seems to emigrate with the host, and is probably a symbiont (Shepard and Gibson, 1972). The

    spiders appear to provide the ants with protection from predators and parasites, while the ant nest is used as a foundation for web construction.

     An additional association has recently been reported between the state-endangered Miami blue butterfly, Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri 

    (Lepidoptera) and T. melanocephalum, where the ant is one of several species observed tending the butterfly larvae (Saarinen and Daniels,

    2006).

    Environmental Requirements

    Very limited information is available relating to environmental requirements and temperature tolerances of T. melanocephalum. Appel et al.

    (2004) investigated laboratory tolerances of workers maintained at a range of humidites and temperature ranging from 15-45°C. Low mortality

    of T. melanocephalum  was observed at 15°C irrespective of the humidity, but the ant was sensitive to desiccation at temperatures of 25°C and

    above. In the United States they are found outside of building structures only in south Florida (below about latitude 29°12’N), with populations

    recorded in northern states only in glasshouses and other human structures (Thompson, 1990; Deyrup et al., 2000). In Hawaii, T.

    melanocephalum  is restricted to the dry lowlands (< 900 m) (Reimer, 1994). Climate modelling work has indicated that T. melanocephalum

    could only become established in temperate countries such as New Zealand within heated buildings, as recorded in other temperate climates

    (e.g. Dubois and Danoffburg, 1994).

    Top of page

    Climate

    Climate Status Description Remark

     Af - Tropical rainforest climate Preferred > 60mm precipitation per month

     Am - Tropical monsoon climate Preferred Tropical monsoon climate ( < 60mm precipitation driest month but > (100 - [total annua lprecipitation(mm}/25]))

     As - Tropical savanna climate with dry

    summer 

    Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in summer) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])

     Aw - Tropical wet and dry savann aclimate

    Preferred < 60mm precipitation driest month (in winter) and < (100 - [total annual precipitation{mm}/25])

    Cf - Warm temperate climate, wet all year Preferred Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, wet all year 

    Cs - Warm temperate climate with drysummer 

    Tolerated Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C, dry summers

    Cw - Warm temperate climate with drywinter 

    Tolerated Warm temperate climate with dry winter (Warm average temp. > 10°C, Cold average temp. > 0°C,dry winters)

    Top of page

    Air Temperature

    Parameter Lower limit Upper limit

     Absolute mini mum temperature (ºC) 13

    Mean annual temperature (ºC) 25.0 29.2

    Mean maximum temperature of hottest month (ºC) 30.5 33.2

    Mean minimum temperature of coldest month (ºC) 18.4 25.8

    Top of page

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    9/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 9/18

    Rainfall

    Parameter Lower limit Upper limit Description

    Dry season duration 0 12 number of consecutive months with

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    10/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 10/18

    Category Impact

    Cultural/amenity Negative

    Economic/livelihood Positive and negative

    Environment (generally) Positive and negative

    Human health Positive and negative

    Economic Impact

    T. melanocephalum’ s economic influence is primarily through its tending honeydew-producing homopterans (Appel et al., 2004). These

    homopteran associations have included root scales (Smith, 1936; cited in Fowler et al., 1990) and fruit scales on bananas (Fowler et al., 1990),

    and a grass root mealybug on the roots of sugarcane (Smith, 1965). In tending these insects T. melanocephalum  protects them from natural

    enemies and receives a “reward” of honeydew. Large pest populations may develop. However, no work has been undertaken to quantify its

    economic impact and no reports have been published indicating it to be a significant pest of horticulture.

     Alternatively, T. melanocephalum  has a role as a predator of other pest and disease-spreading species. These ants have been observed

    attacking diamondback moth larvae in India (Chelliah and Srinivasan, 1986), preying on a disease-spreading bug in Venezuela (Gomez-Nunez,

    1971), destroying eggs and larvae of houseflies in Puerto Rico (Pimental, 1955), and consuming two-spotted spider mites ( Tetranychus urticae),

    aphids, western flower thrips and Ecinothrips americanus  in glasshouses in Florida (Osborne et al., 1995). Again, however, no work has been

    undertaken to quantify the positive economic benefits of this predation of plant pests.

    Top of page

    Environmental Impact

    Previous reviews of pest ants in North America include T. melanocephalum  as a pest only in relation to urban areas (Smith, 1965; Thompson,

    1990; Deyrup et al., 2000). T. melanocephalum  appears be confined to disturbed habitat and in many locations is absent from undisturbed

    natural habitat such as in Florida (Deyrup et al., 2000) or Brazil (Fowler et al., 1994). Where it does occur in natural or semi-natural disturbed

    vegetation or remnants it appears to be a minor component of the community and is never numerically or behaviourally dominant. For example,

    in Tokelau it is present in low densities in forests but is dominated by other ants (Lester and Tavite, 2004).

    In regard to its influence on other ant species, T. melanocephalum  has poor interspecific competitive abilities and is unlikely to displace other 

    ant species in natural environments (Aesch and Cherix, 2005). In São Paulo, Brazil, banana plantations with T. melanocephalum had fewer 

    other ant species than those without T. melanocephalum  (Fowler et al., 1994). However, it was likely that different management practices

    allowed T. melanocephalum  to become established in some orchards rather than T. melanocephalum  extirpating other ants. T.

    melanocephalum  is a rapid coloniser and may benefit from control of other invasive ant species (Lee, 2002).

     At least one positive impact of T. melanocephalum  has been observed for biodiversity. Saarinen and Daniels (2006) found that this ant is one of 

    several species to have been associated with the state-endangered Miami blue butterfly, Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri (Lepidoptera). This

    butterfly requires ants to tend the larvae. The presence of T. melanocephalum  may actually benefit Cyclargus in this situation.

    Top of page

    Social Impact

    The social impact of T. melanocephalum  may be through its association with food supplies, or through health effects.

    T. melanocephalum  has been observed as a significant urban pest capable of infesting residential kitchens and commercial food outlets in large

    numbers (Lee, 2002). It can enter buildings through screens and small cracks and be a general annoyance (Deyrup et al., 2000). In a study of 

    the ant community infesting houses of southern Bahia, Brazil, T. melanocephalum was one of the two most common ant species infesting

    houses (Delabie et al., 1995). It was also one of the three common species in south eastern Brazil (Fowler and Bueno, 1995). In Honolulu,

    Hawaii, T. melanocephalum  was reported as a common household pest in the 1940s, but was seldom collected during the 1950s (Clagg, 1957).No reports were found of it damaging wiring or any other structures within buildings. In Florida, T. melanocephalum  is considered one of the

    most important house-infesting pests; complaints were primarily due to it being a general nuisance (80%) or infesting food (15%) (Klotz et al.,

    1995).

    The health impacts of T. melanocephalum vary tremendously. Some people suffer a slight irritation of the skin following contact with T.

    melanocephalum  (Collingwood et al., 1997). T. melanocephalum  may also have a role in disease transmission. It is abundant in hospitals in

    South America, and capable of transporting pathogenic microbes including seven types of bacteria, such as Enterobacter cloacae  and

    Staphylococcus  sp. (Olaya and Chacon, 2001; cited in Ulloa-Chacon and Jaramillo, 2003; Fowler et al., 1993). However, just as in horticulture,

    T. melanocephalum  may have positive impacts for health. It was found to be the primary predator of the eggs of Rhodnius prolixus, the vector of 

    Chagas disease in coastal Venezuela (Gomez-Nunez, 1971). Chagas disease is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi   and is a serious public health

    problem in Latin America (Gutierrez et al., 2003). This predation on R. prolixus  populations by T. melanocephalum  may account for the absence

    of R. prolixus-associated diseases in this area of Venezuela (Gomez-Nunez, 1971). T. melanocephalum may also feed on flea eggs and larvae

    (Tamsitt and Fox, 1966).

    Top of page

    Risk and Impact Factors

    Impact mechanisms

    Causes allergic responses

    Herbivory/grazing/browsing

    Induces hypersensitivity

    Interaction with other invasive species

    Pest and disease transmission

    Predation

    Impact outcomes

    Host damage

    Increases vulnerability to invasions

    Loss of medicinal resources

    Negatively impacts agriculture

    Negatively impacts cultural/traditional practices

    Top of page

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    11/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 11/18

    Negatively impacts human health

    Negatively impacts livelihoods

    Invasiveness

    Benefits from human association (i.e. it is a human commensal)

    Capable of securing and ingesting a wide range of food

    Fast growing

    Gregarious

    Has high reproductive potential

    Highly mobile locally

    Is a habitat generalistLong lived

    Pioneering in disturbed areas

    Proved invasive outside its native range

    Tolerant of shade

    Tolerates, or benefits from, cultivation, browsing pressure, mutilation, fire etc

    Likelihood of entry/control

    Difficult to identify/detect as a commodity contaminant

    Difficult to identify/detect in the field

    Highly likely to be transported internationally accidentally

    Uses List

    Environmental

    Biological control

    Top of page

    Diagnosis

     A technical description suitable for quarantine purposes is as follows. Antennae are 12-segmented. First antennal segment (scape) is long,

    surpassing the posterior border of the head. Eyes are large, with 9-10 ommatidia in the longest row. Mandibles each have 3 large teeth and

    about 7 small denticles, with the mandible surface containing the teeth and that near the clypeus rounding gradually into one another (basal

    angle absent). The clypeus is without longitudinal carinae; with the anterior margin slightly concave in the alitrunk in profile and almost smoothly

    convex, but with a slight metanotal depression. The propodeum is without spines; the upper surface is shorter than the rear surface. One

    rudimentary node (petiole) is present, which lacks a distinct forward face and is partially or completely concealed when viewed from above byforward projection of the first segment of the gaster. The gaster has four segments on its upper surface. There is a dense fine pubescence all

    over the ant, with erect setae on clypeus and gastral apex only. Stinger and acidopore are absent.

    Top of page

    Detection and Inspection

    One of the best methods for detecting invasive ants including T. melanocephalum  is via baits. They appear to especially like sugary food. Clark

    et al. (1982) found that T. melanocephalum was frequently the only ant present on sugar water baits, but also the species most often replaced,

    suggesting a rapid utilization foraging strategy. Foragers locate and recruit to food quickly (Clark et al., 1982; Lee, 2002). However, they are

    also often displaced when dominant ants discover food resources (Clark et al., 1982), so observations may need to be made of species

    dynamics at baits.

    The Pacific Invasive Ant Key (PIAKey)  manual Pacific Invasive Ants Taxonomy Workshop Manual can both be used in identifying invasive ants in

    the Pacific region.

    Top of page

    Similarities to Other Species/Conditions

    T. melanocephalum  in urban areas can be confused with another common household ant of similar size,  Monomorium pharaonis  (pharaoh ant).

    However, T. melanocephalum  has a distinctively lighter abdomen than thorax and head, while the pharaoh ant has a darker abdomen than

    thorax and head. Also, unlike T. melanocephalum, M. pharaonis has a post-petiole, although this would be difficult to see without magnification.

    Top of page

    Prevention and Control

    Prevention

    This is a classic “tramp” species, which has long been commonly associated with the movement of humans and human produce around the

    globe. This ant has been associated with humans and moving in goods for such a long time that it is likely to have already spread to much of its

    potential global range. Recent incursions into areas such as Finland (Sorvari, 2002) are likely to continue, but in such areas T. melanocephalum

    will be restricted to buildings and facilities such as heated greenhouses.

     As with all invasive species, prevention is bette r and generally much easier than cure. Management of invasion pathways and goods likely to be

    infested is probably the best method for inhibiting invasion. Inspections of cargo and goods previously known to be infested is key to prevention.

    Such a monitoring system would enable an early detection system.

     A key is being developed for invasive ants in the Pacific by Mr Eli Sarnat, from the University of California at Davis. When completed the key will

    be a useful first step in alerting quarantine authorities to the possible presence of T. melanocephalum, but a knowledgeable ant taxonomist

    should be consulted to confirm the presence of this ant species.

    Control

    This section makes extensive use of the review of baiting by Stanley (2004) and Harris et al. (2005).

    There are no known or documented reports of eradication of populations of T. melanocephalum (Stanley, 2004). However, eradication has been

    undertaken for several other ant species (Hoffman and O’Connor, 2004; Lester and Keall, 2005). The techniques used for those species may

    be applicable and effective for T. melanocephalum, although some authors have had difficulties in determining attractive and effective baits for 

    Top of page

    http://www.issg.org/cii/Electronic%20references/pii/project_docs/papp/pacific_ants_taxonomy_workshop_2009.pdfhttp://itp.lucidcentral.org/id/ant/pia/index.html

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    12/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 12/18

    this ant (e.g. Hedges, 1996). Key to the majority of ant eradication work is the repeated high-density application of a highly attractive bait laced

    with a toxicant. The ants take the bait back to the nest and distribute it to all colony members including the queen.

    Research on the use of chemical toxicants for the management of infestations within urban areas has generally been where T.

    melanocephalum  is one of several pest ants. Under such a scenario, other ant species may initially exclude T. melanocephalum  from baits due

    to the poor competitive abilities of T. melanocephalum  (Aesch and Cherix, 2005; Zheng et al., 2006). If able to access baits, T. melanocephalum

    will take baits but it can be difficult achieving effective control (Lee, 2002). In Malaysia, T. melanocephalum  was attracted to both peanut butter 

    and honey (Lee, 2002). Lee and Kooi (2004) recommend using sugar-based attractants in liquid or gel baits to target T. melanocephalum,

    although protein and oil-based foods may also be attractive. Lee (2002) reported limited success using paste and granular bait formulations to

    control T. melanocephalum  and Hedges (1996) also reports difficulties trying to control this species with toxic baits. Boric acid in sucrose water 

    was effective at eliminating T. melanocephalum  in laboratory colonies within 8-12 weeks (Klotz and Williams, 1996; Klotz et al., 1996). In thesame laboratory trial, Maxforce® (hydramethylnon in silkworm pupae protein matrix) had little or no effect on workers or colonies because very

    little was consumed (Klotz et al., 1996). In laboratory trials using hydrmethylnon at higher concentrations (Siege®) or Dimlin® (diflubenzuron) in

    sucrose liquid baits, only limited control of T. melanocephalum  colonies was achieved after 9 weeks (Ulloa-Chacon and Jaramillo, 2003). In

    contrast, fipronil in sucrose liquid baits killed all laboratory colonies within a week (Ulloa-Chacon and Jaramillo, 2003).

    Clearly baits with a high sugar concentration are preferred by T. melanocephalum  and are likely to be the most effective carrier of toxicants.

    Sucrose water exploits the natural feeding habits of honeydew-collecting ants and also provides moisture (Klotz et al., 1996). However, liquid

    baits are not suitable for broadcast baiting, and must be available continuously, making control very labour-intensive (Klotz et al., 1998). Non-

    target issues are also greater when using sweet baits, but this is less of an issue within buildings.

    There are no known biological control agents for T. melanocephalum. Biological control agents exist for ants, such as phorid flies (Vazquez et

    al., 2006), and may occur for T. melanocephalum. However the influence of such agents in regulating any ant population is yet to be

    demonstrated and none are known for T. melanocephalum. Ants are thought to be commonly regulated by interspecific interactions with other 

    ant species (e.g. Dunn et al., 2007) and this certainly appears to be the case with T. melanocephalum, which appears to be excluded from

    habitats with high ant diversity (e.g. Fowler et al., 1994). Enhancing ant diversity within a particular habitat may inhibit or restrict the

    establishment of T. melanocephalum.

    Gaps in Knowledge/Research Needs

    Clearly much less is known about the biology and control of T. melanocephalum than for many other ants or pest species. Such a gap in our 

    knowledge may indicate that T. melanocephalum  is of low relative importance as a pest species. However, key areas for future work regarding

    T. melanocephalum will be:

    1. Establishing the direct or indirect (e.g. through tending scale insect populations) economic impact of this ant species, or perhaps the health

    impacts ofT. melanocephalum

      through its presence in hospital environments;

    2. Determining its native range and origin, which would be helpful for selecting biological control agents if health or economic effects are

    observed. Molecular techniques could be useful for such work;

    3. Examining the native range for biological control agents, such as phorid flies or microbial biological control agents;

    4. Further developing ‘best-practice’ sampling techniques to determine the presence of this species;

    5. Identifying effective chemical control and bait delivery methods for T. melanocephalum.

    Top of page

    References

     Aesch L von, Cherix D, 2005. Introduced ant species a nd mechanisms of competition on Floreana Island (Galápagos, Ecuador) (Hymenoptera:

    Formicidae). Sociobiology, 45(2):463-482. http://www.csuchico.edu/biol/Sociobiology/volume/sociobiologyv45n22005.html#16

     Andersen AN, Reichel H, 1994. The ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) fauna of Holmes Jungle, a rainforest patch in th e seasonal tropics of 

     Australia's Northern Territory. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 33(2) :153-158.

     Appel AG, Na JPS, Lee C, 2004. Temperature and humidity tolerances of the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera:

    Formicidae). Sociobiology, 44:819-100.

     Ayre GL, 1977. Exotic ants in Winnipeg. Manitoba Entomologist, 11:41-44

    Bharti M, Singh D, 2003. Insect faunal succession on decaying rabbit carcasses in Punjab, India. Journal of Forensic Science, 48(5):1-11.

    Brown ES, 1959. Immature nutfall of coconuts in the Solomon Islands. II. Changes in ant populations, and their relation to vegetation. Bulletin of 

    Entomological Research, 50:97-113.

    Burbidge AH, Leicester K, McDavitt S, Majer JD, 1992. Ants as indicators of disturbance at Yanchep National Park, Western Australia. Journal of 

    the Royal Society of Western Australia, 75:89-95.

    Bustos X, Cherix D, 1998. Contribution to the biology of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). (Contribution à la

    biologie de Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).) In: Actes des Colloques Insectes Sociaux, vol. 11: Compte

    rendu colloque annuel, Créteil, France, 3-5 Septembre 1997 [ed. by Lachaud JP, Fourcassie V] Paris, France: Union Internationale pour l'Etude

    d'Insectes Sociaux, 95-101.

    Chelliah S, Srinivasan K, 1986. Bioecology and management of diamondback moth in India. Diamondback Moth Management. Proceedings of 

    the First International Workshop, Tainan, Taiwan, 11-15 March, 1985 Shanhua, Taiwan; Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center,

    63-76

    Chin D, 1998. Ants in the household and backyard. Agnote (Darwin). Darwin, Australia: Department of Industries and Fisheries, Northern

    Territory, 1-5.

    Clagg CF, 1957. Notes and exhibitions: Tapinoma melanocephalum (F. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 16:197.

    Clark DB, Guayasamín C, Pazmiño O, Donoso C, Villacís VP de, 1982. The tramp ant Wasmannia auropunctata: autecology and effects on ant

    diversity and distribution on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Biotropica, 14(3):196-207.

    Top of page

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19841988767http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201968http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19980506840http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19870539263http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19990504751http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201966http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201965http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19800571072http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201964http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19941107230http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20073277365

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    13/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 13/18

    Clouse R, 1999. Leaf-litter inhabitants of a Brazilian pepper stand in Everglades National Park. Florida Entomologist, 82(3):388-403.

    Collingwood CA, 1976, publ. 1978. A provisional list of Iberian Formicidae with a key to the worker caste (Hym. Aculeata). Eos, 52(1/4):65-95.

    Collingwood CA, Agosti D, 1996. Formicidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) of Saudi Arabia (part 2). Fauna of Saudi Arabia, Vol. 15 [ed. by Krupp F,

    Mahnert V]. Basle, Switzerland: Pro Entomologica, Naturhistorisches Museum, 300-385.

    Collingwood CA, Tigar BJ, Agosti D, 1997. Introduced ants in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Arid Environments, 37(3):505-512; 18 ref.

    Cook JL, Martin JB, Gold RE, 1994. First record of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Texas. Southwestern

    Entomologist, 19(4):409-410.

    Dejean A, Akoa A, Djieto-Lordon C, Lenoir A, 1994. Mosaic ant territories in an African secondary rain forest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Sociobiology, 23(3):275-292.

    Delabie JHC, Nascimento IC do, Pacheco P, Casimiro AB, 1995. Community structure of house-infesting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in

    southern Bahia, Brazil. Florida Entomologist, 78:264-270.

    Deyrup M, 1994. Biogeographical survey of the ants of the Island of San Salvador, Bahamas. In: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on the

    natural history of the Bahamas [ed. by Kass LB] San Salvador, Bahamas: Bahamian Field Station, 21-28.

    Deyrup M, Davis L, Cover S, 2000. Exotic ants in Florida. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 126(3/4):293-326.

    Dubois MB, Danoffburg J, 1994. Distribution of ants in Kansas - subfamilies Dolichoderinae and Formicinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).

    Sociobiology, 24:147-178.

    Dunn RR, Parker CR, Sanders NJ, 2007. Temporal patterns of diversity: assessing the biotic and abiotic controls on ant assemblages. Biological

    Journal of the Linnean Society, 91(2):191-201. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/bij

    Fabricius JC, 1793. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Volume 2. Christ. Gottl. Proft, Hafniae.

    Fowler HG, Bernardi JVE, Delabie JC, Forti LC, Pereira-da-Silva V, 1990. Major ant problems of South America. In: Applied Myrmecology: a

    World Perspective [ed. by Meer RKVan der , Jaffe K, Cedeno A] Boulder, USA: Westview Press, 3-14.

    Fowler HG, Bueno OC, Sadatsune T, Montelli AC, 1993. Ants as potential vectors of pathogens in hospitals in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

    Insect Science and its Application, 14(3):367-370.

    Fowler HG, Schlindwein MN, Medeiros MA, 1994. Exotic ants and community simplification in Brazil: a review of the impact of exotic ants on

    native ant assemblages. In: Exotic Ants: Biology, Impact And Control Of Introduced Species [ed. by Williams DF] Boulder, USA: Westview Press,

    151-162.

    Fowler HS, Bueno OC, 1995. Effect of spatial and temporal foraging behavior of dominant ants in an urban structural habitat on assemblage

    composition, with simulations of analysis of diversity sensitivity to dominance. Ciência e Cultura (São Paulo), 47(1/2):79-82.

    Francoeur A, 1977, publ. 1978. A taxonomic and economic synopsis of the ants of Quebec (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). (Synopsis taxonomique

    et economique des fourmis du Quebec (Formicidae, Hymenoptera).) Annals of the Entomological Society of Quebec, 22(3):205-212.

    Gomez-Nunez JC, 1971. Tapinoma melanocephalum as an inhibitor of Rhodnius prolixus populations. Journal of Medical Entomology, 8:735-

    737.

    Gutierrez FP, Osorio YS, Osorno JC, Soto SU, 2003. Susceptibility of Rhodnius pallescens (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) of fifth instar nymph to the

    action of Beauveria spp. Entomotropica, 18:163-168.

    Harada AY, 1990. Ant pests of the Tapinomini tribe. In: Applied Myrmecology: a World Perspective [ed. by Van der Meer RK, Jaffe K, Cedeno A]

    Boulder, USA: Westview Press, 298-315.

    Harris R, Abbott K, Barton K, Berry J, Don W, Gunawardana D, Lester P, Rees J, Stanley M, Sutherland A, Toft R, 2005. Invasive ant pest risk

    assessment project for Biosecurity New Zealand. Series of unpublished Landcare Research contract reports to Biosecurity New Zealand,

    BAH/35/2004-1.

    Hedges SA, 1996. Identical cousins. Pest Control Technology, 24(4):40-43, 101.

    Hoffmann BD, O'Connor S, 2004. Eradication of two exotic ants from Kakadu National Park. Ecological Management & Restoration, 5(2):98-

    105.

    ISSG, 2012. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Auckland, New Zealand: University of 

     Auckland . http://www.issg.org/database

    Klimes P, Okrouhlík J, 2015. Invasive ant Tapinoma melanocephalum  (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a rare guest or increasingly common indoor 

    pest in Europe? European Journal of Entomology, 112(4):705-712. http://www.eje.cz/artkey/eje-201504-

    0016_Invasive_ant_Tapinoma_melanocephalum_Hymenoptera_Formicidae_A_rare_guest_or_increasingly_common_indoor_pest.php

    Klotz JH, Mangold JR, Vail KM, Davis LR, Patterson RS, 1995. A survey of the urban pest ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of peninsular 

    Florida. Florida Entomologist, 78:109-118.

    Klotz JH, Oi DH, Vail KM, Williams DF, 1996. Laboratory evaluation of a boric acid liquid bait on colonies of Tapinoma melanocephalum

     Argentine ants and Pharoah ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 89:673- 677.

    Lee CY, 2002. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Urban Pests [ed. by Jones SC, Zhai J, Robinson WH]. Viriginia, USA:

    Pocahontas Press, 3-8.

    Lee CY, Kooi TE, 2004. Guide to urban pest ants of Singapore.

    Lester PJ, 2005. Determinants for the successful establishment of exotic ants in New Zealand. Diversity and Distributions, 11(4):279-288.

    http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=ddi

    Lester PJ, Keall JB, 2005. The apparent establishment and subsequent eradication of the Australian giant bulldog ant, Myrmecia brevinoda

    Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 32(4):353-357.

    Lester PJ, Tavite A, 2004. Long-legged ants, Anoplolepis gracilipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), have invaded Tokelau, changing composition

    and dynamics of ant and invertebrate communities. Pacific Science, 58(3):391-401.

    Loke PY, Lee CY, 2004. Foraging behavior of field populations of the big-headed ant, Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

    Sociobiology, 43:211-219.

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201982http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20043150056http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20063004872http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20053126107http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201981http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201980http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201979http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20153433413http://www.issg.org/databasehttp://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20043150032http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19960503966http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201978http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201977http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201976http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201975http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19780553383http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19960505348http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201973http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19940502402http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201972http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067205370http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20073146631http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201969http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20013034482http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20067201970http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19951102143http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19951105448http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19980503013http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19971109318http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/19780555991http://www.cabi.org/isc/abstract/20001107571

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    14/18

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    15/18

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    16/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 16/18

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    17/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54310 17/18

    Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Cookies Accessibility Feedback

    Copyright © 2016 CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark

    Top of page

    http://www.cabi.org/isc/contact-us/http://www.linkedin.com/company/cabihttps://twitter.com/CABI_Newshttps://www.facebook.com/CABI.developmenthttp://www.cabi.org/feedback/http://www.cabi.org/accessibility/http://www.cabi.org/cookie-information/http://www.cabi.org/terms-and-conditions/http://www.cabi.org/privacy-policy/

  • 8/16/2019 Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Ghost Ant)

    18/18

    5/13/2016 Tapinoma melanocephalum (ghost ant)