Upload
anis-dorsey
View
226
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tan Ching TiongLECB Project Manager
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
NAMAs Seeking International Support:Selected Cases from Malaysia
UNFCCC Workshop for the Asia-Pacific and Eastern European Regions on NAMAs12-14 June 2015, Bonn, Germany
2
NAMA Development in Malaysia
National framework & arrangements
2013 2014 2015
Prioritisation for pilot cases
NAMAs for recognition (3 cases)
NAMAs seeking international support (4-5 cases)
Sectoral assessment on potential & role of NAMAs
Mitigation, NAMAs & MRVInterim Arrangement
TWG on NAMAChair: NRE-BPASPI
[LECB]
TWG on MitigationChair: NRE-BPASPI
[BUR/NC3]
TWG on MRVChair: NRE-BPASPI
[BUR/NC3]
NAMAs
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1) Institutional arrangements & procedures on mitigation actions (incl. NAMAs & MRV)
2) MRV methodology
National arrangements
for climate change
a) …b) Mitigation WGc) Verification WGd) …
(in progress)
Different TORSimilar membership
4
Endorsement & Submission of NAMA Documents
Interim Arrangement
NAMAs from Malaysia should have applied for and obtained endorsement of the national government, including a letter of support from the ministry that is the national focal point for climate change as well as a letter of support from the responsible sector ministry.
NAMAs for recognition at UNFCCC-NAMA Registry are required to undergo verification for acceptance for submission to the UNFCCC NAMA Registry.
NAMA documents for international funding and UNFCCC-NAMA Registry will be submitted through national focal point for climate change.
5
NAMAs Seeking International Support
1. Avoided Emissions from Peat Swamp Forest Management and Central Forest Spine Ecological Connectivity in South East Pahang
2. Support to Integrated E-Waste Management System for State of Sabah, Malaysia
3. NAMA in Support of Implementation of the Electric Mobility Blueprint in Malaysia
4. Reactivation of RE-based CDM Project Activities in Malaysia
5. Implementation of the Low Carbon Island Model for Langkawi Island
6. ……
GEF
RMKe10
REDD+ Funds
NAMA and REDD+ Funds
Avoided Emissions from Peat Swamp Forest Management & Central Forest Spine Ecological
Connectivity in South East Pahang
Financing Mechanism
Pahang State Natural Resources
Conservation Trust Fund
Pahang State Natural Resources
Conservation Trust Fund
During Project Implementation
Post-Project Stage
National Natural
Resources Conservation
Trust Fund
State Government Contribution
Private Sector
Engagement
NAMA Funding
Result-Based Finance
Arrangement
Result-Based Finance System
National Natural
Resources Conservation
Trust Fund
State Government Contribution
Private Sector
Commitment
Inte
rnati
onal
Fi
nanc
ing
Dom
estic
Res
ourc
es
Mainstreaming into Pahang State green economy agenda
Integration into Pahang State sectoral and cross-sectoral plans & programmes
NAMA Support Activities
NAMA Support
Domestic Resources International NAMA Funding
• Land acquisition• Infrastructure
development
• Establishment & initial operation of state-level trust fund.
• Results-based financing instrument.• Policy approaches for mainstreaming
long-term implementation.• Enhanced fire management
programme.• Enhanced ecological connectivity
through planning instruments.• Capacity building for relevant
stakeholders.RM 484 million
(USD 140 million)RM 62 million
(USD 18 million)
Long-term Im
plementation
2016-2020
9
Potential Contribution to Climate Change Mitigation
The NAMA will contribute toward climate change mitigation in two ways:• Short to medium term, avoided emissions at the targeted landscape.• Long-term, carbon sequestration.
Short-term impacts – total avoided emissions 12 MT CO2:• Avoided emissions from Peat Swamp conserved under CFS (total area =
5,657.79 ha.) and amounts to 4.24 MT CO2
• Avoided emissions from other Forested areas conserved under CFS (total area = 23,411.03 ha) and amounts to 7.84 MT CO2.
The assumptions:
• The carbon stocks for Stateland forest is obtained from the 4th National Forest Inventory for Inland and Peat swamp forest.
• The carbon conversion factor used is 0.47 as per 2006 IPCC Guidelines• The other carbon pools; dead wood, soil and leaf litter were not
estimated.
10
Integrated E-Waste Management System in Sabah
Study on E-Waste in Sabah under the BIMP EAGA
Environmental Cluster & ICT Cluster (2013-2014)
Sabah E-waste Strategy Action Plan
11
Financing Plan
Sources of Financing
Estimated Amount
Coverage
Domestic: Co-Financingof government, private sectors & NGOs
RM 112 million(USD 30.2
million)
• In-kind contribution (salary, work place, allowances etc.)
• Facility investment
International: NAMA funding support
RM 25 million(USD 6.7 million)
• Collection and transport cost subsidy
• Existing facility upgrade• Collection points management• Technical assistance• Experience sharing (scale up)• Awareness and training• MRV system (web system etc.)
12
NAMA Support for Implementation
Stage 1 & Stage 2:Local transportation costs (31%); Shipping costs (32%); Infrastructure upgrades (4%); Operating cost (3%); Management & maintenance (5%); Awareness, education & training (10%); Good practice & experience sharing with BIMP-EAGA members (1%); Web system development/ maintenance (1%); Consultancy & web application cost (9%); Project management (4%); and Contingencies (1%)
13
Estimated Emission Reduction
Total emission reduction from 2016-2030: 652,772 tCO2e. • 2016-2020: 147,736 tCO2e• 2021-2030: 505,036 tCO2e
Methodology: • CDM methodology “AMS-III.BA Recovery and recycling of materials
from e-waste” version 01.0 • GHG Protocol HFC Tool (Version 1.0) - Calculating HFC and PFC
Emissions from the Manufacturing, Installation, Operation and Disposal of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Equipment.
MRV indicators:• amount of e-waste collected, number of e-waste collection point
setup, number of e-waste collection drive, awareness activities and campaign conducted.
14
Challenges in NAMA Uptake
International negotiation on NAMA is still ongoing at the UNFCCC. Its role in the new international agreement on climate change, which is expected to be agreed by 2015, is uncertain.
To domestic stakeholders, NAMA is still a rather new issue. Without a prescriptive definition, scope and approach from the UNFCCC discourse, domestic deliberation and decision on national implementation framework and arrangement for NAMA was undertaken prudently.
Available financing opportunity on NAMA is limited and highly uncertain. This situation increases the difficulty in convincing agencies to commit efforts in pursuing NAMAs, especially those requiring large investment or already having sufficient domestic resources for ongoing initiatives.
THANK YOU!
Low Emission Capacity Building (LECB) ProjectThe LECB Project aims to assist Malaysia in enhancing national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory systems, promoting the uptake of nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMA) as well as designing measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) framework that ultimately serves national priorities for low emission development strategy.
The UNDP LECB Programme is supported through contributions by the European Commission, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, and the Government of Australia.
Tan Ching TiongLECB Project ManagerTel: +(603) 8886 1669Fax: +(603) 8888 4473
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]