113
Aspect A framework for analysis

TAM 2012 Aspect

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

A framework for analysis

Page 2: TAM 2012 Aspect

So far...

Tense locates events in time

Temporal location: ST = central tense = deictic

Temporal interpretation :

(i) tense morphemes (/z/. /d/, ?will)

(ii) time adverbials

Page 3: TAM 2012 Aspect

So far...

Temporal interpretation is COMPOSITIONAL.

= the relations which obtain between three time intervals: ST/RT/ET

ST/RT = tense

ET/RT = aspect

RT/ST = existential status

Page 4: TAM 2012 Aspect

TP 2

T’ 2

T AspPRT/ST 2

Asp’ 2

Asp VPET/RT 4

= ST/ ET

Page 5: TAM 2012 Aspect

So far...

Time adverbials: aspectual information

ET/RT = aspect

ASPECT?

Page 6: TAM 2012 Aspect

Today

Defining aspect

Lexical aspect/situation-type aspect

Grammatical/viewpoint aspect

Page 7: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

aspect as a functional category grammatical markers of aspect a functional projection headed by Asp

aspect < the temporal characteristics of the situationdenoted by the predicate (i.e. lexical meaning)

Page 8: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

(1)

He is dancing.

He has fixed the car.

He is knocking at the door.

He noticed her at once.

Page 9: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

[+/-perfective] [+/-progressive] [+/iterative]

[+/- durative] [+/- resultative] ….

information about the internal structure of the situation and about the way in which the speaker perceives this situation

Page 10: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

"the semantic domain of the temporal structure of situations (events and states) and their presentation." (Smith 1991)

Page 11: TAM 2012 Aspect

Situation-type aspect

Situation types classify events/states in terms of clusters of semantic features

The linguistic unit which realizes situation type is "the verb constellation"

Page 12: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

situation-type aspect represents an interaction of:

(i) the lexical meaning of the verb

(ii) the internal and external arguments of the verb

(iii) certain adjuncts

Page 13: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John ate an apple. = [+telic]

John ate popcorn. = [-telic]

the type of DO is relevant for the aspectual value of the predicate

Page 14: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Students have been discovering this library for ages.

??John has been discovering this library for ages.

The subject is relevant for the aspectual value of the predicate

Page 15: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John ran in the park. [-telic]

John ran to the park. [+telic]

Certain adjuncts are relevant for the aspectual value of the predicate

Page 16: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Situation-types:

states

activities

definite change of state predicates

semelfactives

Page 17: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John is tall.

John is running.

[+/- stative]

A stative situation = no internal change

= no dynamics

Page 18: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John dances beautifully.

John made a chair.

[+/- telic] // [+/- resultative]

A telic event = has a natural endpoint at which the event is finished.

Page 19: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John built a house. [+durative]

John noticed a mistake. [-durative]

[+/- durative]

Page 20: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

build a house, draw a horse

++-ACCOMPLISHMENTS

notice, spot+--ACHIEVEMENTS

run, dance, rain

-+-ACTIVITIES

be tall; stand, sit

-++STATES

Examples+/-telic +/-durative

+/-

stativeSituation-type

Page 21: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John sneezed.

They hiccupped.

She knocked on the door.

The child jumped up and down.

+/- durative?

+/- stative?

+/- telic?

Page 22: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

The simplest possible situation:

[-stative]

[-durative]

[-telic]

= semelfactives (Smith 1991)

< Latin semel (once, a single time)

< Latin factum (event, occurrence)

Page 23: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Vs. Comrie (1976)

Semelfactives:

[-stative]

[-durative]

[+telic]/ perfective

Page 24: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

= semantic classes of predicates

an idealization of types of situations characterized by a bundle of semantic features

each class: unique interpretive properties and unique distributional properties

indirect syntactic correlates of semantic concepts

Page 25: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

STATES / Stative verb constellations

John loves Mary.

Mary is a linguist.

Mary believes linguistics is fun.

Page 26: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

lack dynamics

hold for a moment or an interval, with an arbitrary final point

are homogeneous: when they hold for an interval they also hold for every sub-interval of that interval

Page 27: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

States normally resist the progressive:

*John is being tall.

*John is knowing English.

* John is owning a farm.

Page 28: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

BUT John is lying in the grass. John is standing in the doorway. You are being rude!

These statives allow a stage-level interpretation , they refer to a momentary situation they can occur in the progressive.

Page 29: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

a distinction which is relevant:

(i) stage-level predicates (SLPs)

= temporary or accidental properties

tired, angry, run

(ii) individual-level predicates (ILPs)

= (more or less) permanent or inherent properties

blond, intelligent, tall

Page 30: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

States:

(i) which allow a stage-level interpretation

(ii) which do not allow a stage-level interpretation, which are exclusively ILPs

TASK:

John is polite.

(i) or (ii) ?

Page 31: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John is polite.

John is being polite.

The statue stands in the middle of the square.

Your box is standing in the middle of the room.

Page 32: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

My coat has a big zip.

*My coat is having a big zip.

The moat surrounds the castle.

*The moat is surrounding the castle.

Page 33: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

States which cannot be interpreted as stage-level predicates resist the progressive.

States which can be interpreted as stage-level predicates can be used in the progressive

Page 34: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John is tall.

*John is being tall.

John is rude.

John is being rude.

Page 35: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

States usually resist the imperative:

*Know the answer!

*Be tall!

Vs. Be polite!

< [+/- control] (on the part of the subject )

Page 36: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

ACTIVITIES

dynamic

durative

they lack a natural endpoint [atelic]

run in the park, dance with John, rain, eat cherries, laugh, make noise, roll, rain, snow, play the piano.

Page 37: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

They consist entirely in the process

They are homogeneous

Page 38: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Activities differ from change of state predicates

(i) Does x was V-ing (pragmatically) entail x has V-ed?

John was dancing. John has danced. John was making a cake. John has made a cake.

Page 39: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

(ii) =the entailment of stop +V-ing

John stopped running.

John stopped painting a picture.

= ?

Page 40: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

(iii) =the adverb ALMOST : different effects on activities and change of state predicates:

He almost ran.

He almost painted a picture.

He almost killed her.

Page 41: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Accomplishment: Activity (Process) + Result

He painted a picture

[he did something] which caused [a picture to exist]

Page 42: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

ALMOST can modify one of the two parts:

(i) ALMOST [he did something] which caused [a picture to exist]

(ii) [he did something] which caused ALMOST [a picture to exist]

Page 43: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Vs. activities:

He almost ran.

Page 44: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

=IN Phrases

*He ran in an hour.

He made a chair in an hour.

He noticed the mistake in a second.

Page 45: TAM 2012 Aspect

Last week....

Situation-type aspect situation-types

states

activities

Page 46: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 1

Be tall

Be polite

Sit

Stand

Lie

Love

Page 47: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 2

Dance

Rain

Snow

Play chess

Play the piano

Run

Walk

Work

Page 48: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 3

Know Chinese

Speak Chinese to a friend

Like red wine

Drink wine

Work

Understand

Listen

Page 49: TAM 2012 Aspect

Today

situation-types cont.

achievements

accomplishments

semelfactives

Class shift/recategorization

Viewpoint aspect

Page 50: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

ACHIEVEMENTS

instantaneous changes of state

with an outcome of a new state entail the existence of a result

the event consists of a single stage which is the very change of state they refer to.

+ dynamic, +telic, +instantaneous

Page 51: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

reach the top, win a race, arrive, find, notice, recognize, break

A. Ach. which have no preliminary stages B. Ach. which “allow” preliminary stages

+/- progressive

Page 52: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

*John is noticing a mistake.

* I am finding the book.

John is winning the race.

She is recovering slowly.

Page 53: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

In… vs. for…

John noticed her in a second.

*John noticed her for a second.

John recovered in a week.

*John recovered for a week.

Page 54: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

build a house, build a bridge, make a cake, draw a circle….

[+dynamic]

[+durative]

[+telic]

Page 55: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

complex events made up of a series of successive stages and a natural end point

= a process + an outcome

Page 56: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

they do not refer to homogeneous situations. Their internal stages are successive. But these stages and the final point are seen as a single event.

Page 57: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Compatible with adverbials of completion: IN…

He made a chair in an hour.

They built the house in ten years.

Page 58: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

ambiguous with ALMOST

They almost killed her. He almost fixed the computer.

TASK: (i) ?(ii) ?

Page 59: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

SEMELFACTIVES

knock, hiccup, flap a wing, hiccup, sneeze, belch, burp, cough, jump

+ Instantaneous:

Their initial and final points are simultaneous/ they take place over the shortest possible interval

Page 60: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

+ the imperfective viewpoint or durative adverbials

He was jumping up and down.He was sneezing. He coughed for 5 minutes.

Reinterpreted as activities

Page 61: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

= the interpretation of the contour of the whole situation: a SHIFT from one class to another/ class shift//recategorization

Page 62: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

John ate. = activity

John ate sandwiches. = activity

John ate sandwiches for hours on end.

Page 63: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

BUT:

John ate two sandwiches.

= a delimiter accomplishment

Page 64: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

John wrote letters. activity

John wrote letters for two hours.

John wrote ten letters. accomplishment

John wrote ten letters in 30 minutes/ *for two hours.

Page 65: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

Two tourists have discovered the beautiful forest.

Achievement

*Two tourists have been discovering the beautiful forest.

Tourists have been discovering that beautiful forest for years.

activity/iterativity < TOURISTS = bare plural/indefinite

Page 66: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

An idea occurred to her. achievement

?? An idea occurred to her for weeks.

Strange ideas occurred to her for weeks.

activity/iterativity < STRANGE IDEAS

Page 67: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

The nature of the arguments of the verb can cause a type shift/recategorization:

(i) the internal argument of V

(ii) the external argument of V

Page 68: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

John ran. activityJohn ran for an hour.

John ran a mile.

an adverbial of extent [a delimiter] accomplishment John ran a mile *for an hour.John ran a mile in an hour.

Page 69: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

The child swam. activity

The child swam for two hours.

The child swam to the shore.

a delimiter

Accomplishment

Page 70: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

The child swam to the shore in 10 minutes.

Page 71: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

She knocked at the door. (single? Repeated?)

She REPEATEDLY knocked at the door. an event of the multiple type

The wheel revolved.

The wheel revolved all day.

Page 72: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

Adverbials

can cause type shift/recategorization.

Page 73: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

John made a chair. accomplishment

John was making a chair. activity

They reached the top. achievement

They were reaching the top. activity

Page 74: TAM 2012 Aspect

The floating nature of situation types

PROG can cause type shift/recategorization

Page 75: TAM 2012 Aspect

Conclusions so far

Aspect: the internal structure of situations

situation-type aspect (lexical aspect)

States

Activities

Accomplishments

Achievements

semelfactives

Page 76: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 4

Notice a mistake

Discover

Find

Recover

Page 77: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 5

Build a house

Draw a horse

Bake a cake

Break a window

Kill a cockroach

Page 78: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 6

Jump

Knock

Sneeze

Hiccup

Page 79: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 7

The glass broke.

John broke a glass.

The snow melted.

The sun melted the snow.

Page 80: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 7

The soup cooled.

John cooled the soup.

Play chess

Play a game of chess

Page 81: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 7

Know English

Speak English

Learn English

Play the piano

Play a concert

Reach the top of the mountain

Win a game

Page 82: TAM 2012 Aspect

Task 7

They swept the floor clean.

He hammered the metal flat.

He shot them dead.

Page 83: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

So far... situation-type aspect

Page 84: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

He was dancing.

He was knocking at the door.

aspectual information is rendered both morphologically and lexically.

Page 85: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

"the semantic domain of the temporal structure of situations (events and states) and their presentation." (Smith 1991)

Page 86: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Lexical aspect / situation-type aspect

Grammatical aspect/ viewpoint aspect

Page 87: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

He was dancing.

He has fixed the car.

He was knocking at the door.

He noticed her at once.

= a way ‘of viewing the internal temporal constituency of a situation.’ (Comrie 1976).

Page 88: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

The internal structure of situations takes up intervals of time in different ways:

(i) Presented as a whole

(ii)Focus on one “stage”

(iii)Focus on their iterativity

etc.

Page 89: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect. Viewpoint …

aspect : encodes information with respect to the way in which the speaker chooses to present/to view the situation

as a whole [ +perfective]

only incompletely, with a focus on one stage of the situation. [+progressive]

= viewpoint aspect

Page 90: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

The perfective viewpoint

The progressive viewpoint

Page 91: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John is reading.

John was reading.

John has read this book.

John had read the book.

John will read this book.

John will be reading this book when...

Page 92: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Aspect = non-deictic

< it does not locate the event in time. Its interpretation is not related to ST.

tense = the ‘situation external time’

aspect =the ‘situation-internal time’

Page 93: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Viewpoint aspect is grammaticized, i.e. it has grammatical markers:

a. [be + ing] = the imperfective// progressive viewpoint.

b. [have + en] = the perfective viewpoint

Page 94: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

It was Frank’s bad leg that woke him; it was paining him worse than ever in his old age.

Something was slithering towards him along the dark corridor floor.

America’s anti-hunting movement is tiny by British standards. But it is gathering momentum.

Page 95: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

stages of an event

focus on an internal stage/ on internal stages which lack both the initial and the final boundary

the situation is perceived as open/ going on/ incomplete

Page 96: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

= the predicate denotes only a ‘time-space slice’ of an ‘open’ situation whose limits are indefinite.

=the event does not end, it does not culminate, it is simply going on. It ‘holds’ at RT.

Page 97: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

the imperfective viewpoint presents situations as open, focussing on the internal stages of an event in progress.

It has grammatical markers in English

(i) [be – ing]

(ii) -ing

Page 98: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John is dancing.

present 3rd sg , i.e. Tense and Agr.

They were dancing.

past 3rd pl.

Page 99: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

be= an auxiliary which carries tense and agreement information

-ing = the grammatical marker of the imperfective viewpoint (the progressive)

Page 100: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

TP2

Spec T’2

T AspPis 2

Asp’2

Asp VP

ing

Page 101: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

-ing: locates an event at/around RT

John is dancing.

ST=nowRT = ST [present]ET at/around RT [imperfective viewpoint]ET at/around ST [open situation]

Page 102: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John was dancing.

ST=

RT ST

ET RT

ET ST

Page 103: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John was dancing.

ST= now

RT before ST [PAST]

ET at/around RT [imperfective viewpoint]

ET at/around ST [open situation/on-going]

Page 104: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect :the perfective viewpoint

THE PERFECTIVE VIEWPOINT:

the situation is presented as a WHOLE , it is “over”:

They have already washed the dishes.

John has fixed the computer.

Page 105: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

there are grammatical markers for the perfective viewpoint:

(i) [have –en]

(ii) –en

Page 106: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Whenever [have –en] is present, ET presented as a whole and it is interpreted as instantiated before RT. Whether the situation is complete or not at RT depends on the lexical meaning of the verb.

Page 107: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

(i) Have –en

(ii) –en

–en = the marker of perfectivity. The auxiliary have: a mere carrier of Tense and Agreement

Page 108: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

TP2

Spec T’2

T AspPhave 2

Asp’2

Asp VP

-en

Page 109: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John has left.

ST= now

RT = ST [Present]

ET before RT [Perfective]

ET before ST [historical existential status]

Page 110: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

John had left ten days before.

ST= now

RT before ST [ Past]

ET before RT [Perfective]

ET before ST [ historical existential status]

Page 111: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

At 5.00 tomorrow I will have already sent the letter.

ST = now

RT after ST [future]

ET before RT [perfective]

ET after ST [non-historical ES]

Page 112: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

So far:

the perfective viewpoint (-en) : ET prior to RT

the imperfective viewpoint (-ing): ET spans RT (or ET at/around RT)

neutral viewpoint (0 marker): ET=RT.

Page 113: TAM 2012 Aspect

Aspect

Aspectual interpretation:

< situation-type aspect + viewpoint aspect