Upload
arvind-shah
View
160
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
by Arvind Shah, Professor (Emeritus) at Neuchâtel University & EPFL – Founder of PV-Lab
« Thin-film silicon solar modules: a technology for the future»
In 1985, we founded the PV Lab Neuchâtel ,with the goal of lowering the production costs of solar cells. We chose to work on thin-film silicon, because of the following reasons (WHICH ARE STILL VALID): a) Silicon is an abundant
material (constitutes 28% of the earth’s crust)
b) Silicon is NOT a toxic material
c) Thin-film silicon solar cells allow for reductions in cost and in production energy as compared to the conventional wafer-based silicon solar cells
Let us now look at the Development of Thin-film Silicon Modules in the past And Make from this Projections for the Future
Since 1975, amorphous silicon had been introduced by the group of Prof. Walter Spear as low-cost material for large-area applications, such as solar panels and displays.
Somewhere between Scotland and the USA
And they continue to talk
Around 1980: Chris Wronski and Dave Carlson of RCA Labs had introduced
the p-i-n solar cell structure, Yukinori Kuwano of Sanyo had made the first commercial amorphous silicon solar cells, for calculators
1985 our group at IMT Neuchâtel started with just 3 members 1987 we introduced VHF high-rate plasma deposition 1993 we pioneered microcrystalline silicon as absorber layer 1994 we introduced the «micromorph» tandem solar cell
Light
amorphous silicon e
microcrystalline silicon n
Back Reflector (BR) e
amorphous silicon absorbs blue and green light
microcrystalline silicon absorbs red and infrared light
The «micromorph» solar cell Is a sandwich of a slice of amorphous silicon and a slice of microcrystalline silicon
1994-2006: the «micromorph» tandem solar cell is taken up by many Industries in the whole world (Switzerland, EU; USA; Japan; China,...)
2003 IMT signed a licensing contract with OERLIKON 2007—2009 OERLIKON sold 20 production lines 2012 OERLIKON SOLAR became TOKYO ELECTRON SOLAR
Since 2012 TOKYO ELECTRON is selling the 2nd generation ThinFab™ achieving: • Manufacturing cost of “micromorph modules” à € 0.35/Wp, • Stabilized efficiency 10.8% • 154 Wp module performance (for ≈ 1.4 m2 total area)
àIt took almost 20 years from Lab Concept (1994) to real Production Line (2012)
The result is: Automated, Large-scale, High-cost High-Performance Equipment
1999-2009: Germany introduced Feed-in Tariffs for solar electricity, leading to a 4% share of PV current
2002-2009: China reduced fabrication costs for PV panels by 50%
2008-2009: World-wide financial crisis
In the Year 2009
Solyndra, a production unit for CIGS-type thin-film modules, was built with the support of a $535 million federal loan guarantee ;
it closed down in 2011
Solyndra, a Californian panel manufacturer abruptly ceased all operations on 31.8.2011
The largest manufacturer of flexible thin-film silicon solar modules, Uni-Solar, closed down in 2011
SHUT DOWN
On February 14, 2012, Uni-Solar, a Michigan-based solar panel manufacturer filed for bankruptcy
CLOSED DOWN
The Swiss manufacturer of flexible thin-film silicon solar modules, Flexcell/VHF-Technologies S.A.,
goes bankrupt in September 2012
Thin Film 2012–2016: Technologies, Markets and Strategies for Survival – MJ Shiao, Senior Analyst, Solar Markets | GTM Research
IN 2012 ALL TYPES of Thin-film solar cells have “gone crashing down” and with them the «micromorph» tandems
Module Price Trends
0.1
1
10
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Mod
ule Price in USA
$/Wp
Year
Séries1
Expon. (Séries1)
Price crash due to overcapacity
Module Price in (USA) $/Wp
(not corrected for infla4on)
Price increase due to silicon shortage
Source: 1985-‐2010 Data from Navigant (Paula Mints)
In the future we expect module prices to increase again à 0.90 $/Wp for 2017-2020 At about 0.50 $/Wp module prices will reach a minimum level given by materlal costs
LITTLE HOPE FOR THIN-FILM-SILICON? NOT TRUE!!
àFor special NICHE applications. We need flexible, low-weight, unbreakable thin-film panels
Here, heavy breakable conventional modules are being transported-- in a very precarious manner
Here, flexible, low-weight, unbreakable thin-film panels would be much better!
16
But what about Replacing Nuclear Energy by Photovoltaics ? (This would be a VERY large market for PV)
EXAMPLE OF SWITZERLAND In Switzerland today 60% of electric current is from hydroelectric power stations
40 % from Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Current should be replaced in 2034 by renewable energy § Solar (photovoltaic) § Wind § Biomass, Geothermal
Harry Truman
Energy Payback Times (EPBT) (this is an aspect which will play an increasing role in the future)
2010
AssumpRons: • 1700 kWh/ m2 solar
radiaRon (Southern Europe)
• OpRmal module inclinaRon
Source: Mariska deWild Scholten, European PV Conference 2011
: u Modules
produced with Chinese polysilicon à slightly
higher EPBT values,
à much higher carbon footprints
u Future thin-film silicon modules with improved laminates
should have strongly reduced values of EPBT
Replacing Nuclear Electricity in CH by Renewables, by 2034: EXAMPLE OF SWITZERLAND Let us think of using Electricity from the Swiss Nuclear Reactors, to produce Swiss solar modules: 1. Half of Nuclear to be replaced
by Wind, Biomass, etc.
àWith present Technology: NO problem at all!
2. Other Half by Solar (PV) à With present c-Si PV Technology
(EPBT 4 years): we would need 20% of our Nuclear Current
à With future thin-film PV Technology (EPBT 0.4 years): we would need 2% of our Nuclear Current
2013-2017: we expect stabilization of the PV market à increase of module market prices by 10 t0 20%
à renewed interest in thin-film PV modules
The Future
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 PV M
odule Prod
ucvR
on in GWp
Year
Séries1
Expon. (Séries1)
Annual PV Module ProducRon in GWp
ProjecRons >2010: EPIA Scenarios Global Annual New Installed PV Capacity, 2000 to2015
Module Production Trends
Global PV Production Capacity versus annual PV market
Almost factor 2 overcapacity
End of overcapacity: 2017
Source: EPIA: “Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics” (published June 2013)
Conclusions • Since 2009 PV module prices have crashed
– (gone down by a factor of three) • This is due to two effects:
– Production capacity is twice as high as market volume – World Financial Crisis
• Until 2017 the situation will be stabilized, At 80 GWp market demand, 75 GWp prod. capacity and 0.90 $/Wp module price
• At that moment thin-film modules will be very competitive, But their efficiency will always be lower and they will therefore be suitable for only a part of the applications
• As we go over to replace Nuclear Electricity (partly) with PV, Production Energy (and Energy Payback Time) will become important Materials Availability will also be a decisive factor • At that moment “micromorph” solar modules
will be again ONE OF THE WINNING TECHNOLOGIES
Conclusions for Greensolar (GS) à There will definitely be a large market for GS-type equipment by 2015-2017 ü Until 2015, the present small GS team can bring out record micromorph cells on a low-cost machine