Talent Evolution What stage are you at?. Finding your position We’d like you to think about your...
If you can't read please download the document
Talent Evolution What stage are you at?. Finding your position We’d like you to think about your organisation and ask yourself: –Do we have a strategic
Finding your position Wed like you to think about your
organisation and ask yourself: Do we have a strategic approach to
talent management? Do we have a systemic approach, or do we do it
sporadically? Are our executive team engaged in talent? Who
champions talent management? Do our systems and processes support
talent management?
Slide 3
Talent Evolution Grid Where would you place your organisation?
Conceptual Acceptance There is an organisation wide definition of
talent There is a talent strategy The CEO and Executive Team
endorse the importance of talent There is a talent champion Time
allocated at the Board to discuss talent The Senior team act as
role models There is a collaborative approach to talent management
Talent Management is part of management Employees are encouraged
and are confident in taking responsibility for their own
development There is a business case for investment in talent
Diversity is enhanced by talent management Practical Implementation
There is integration /alignment between the business
strategy/OD/Leadership and talent Outputs are both transformational
and transactional There are systems and processes in place-
appraisals/inductions Performance management reflects talent
management The tools of talent management are used extensively-
talent conversations TM used along the employment life cycle
Cascade of mentoring of next in line talent TM language pervades
people processes- recruitment/induction/ongoing development
Information management systems are up to date There is employee buy
in to talent management Talent champion (high level engagement, not
much output) Talent system (practice aligned with vision and
strategy) Talent desert (no engagement, no practice) Talent factory
(lots of output, but sporadic approach) Conceptual Acceptance (CA)
High Lo w Practical Implementation (PI)Low High