Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Takeda PharmaGrangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
8100/M120
Emissions to AtmosphereReport No:
Report Date:
Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co Louth
Phone: +353 41 98 45440
21/06/2018
Industrial Emissions Licence: P0693-01
Page 1 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
Report for the Periodic Monitoring of Emissions to Air
Executive Summary
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0693-01
Y18Q19762
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Takeda Pharma
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
014672574
Aileen Stack
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
UKAS Registration number 2802
Report Date: 21/06/2018
Signed: ____________________________ Signed: ____________________________
-1
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence
Report created using QRSys version
8100/M120
18/06/2018
Jason McGuirk
MM14 1320
Level 2
Technician
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Written By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
Aadil Khan
MM11 1120
Level 2
Field Services Manager
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Approved By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
3.9 January 2018
Page 2 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Contents
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Requirements
1.3.- Monitoring Results
1.4.- Operational Information
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
1.6.- Monitoring Procedures and Deviations
2.- Part 2
Appendix 1: General Information
Appendix 2: Monitoring Information
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Page 3 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Remarks
All the sampling points were obtainable Yes
As per request, sampling was carried out in triplicate (a, b and c).
The monitoring was carried out as requested by the management of the company above mentioned. The customer has chosen not to sample to the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 for the substances monitored at the emission points listed below as stated in the Confirmation Form received from the customer.
Opinions and interpretations expressed in this report are outside the scope of any claimed UKAS accreditation.EPA requirements AG1 (Safety) and AG2 (Monitoring Guidance Note) were applied during the monitoring.
MP-P1-03
Parameter Result
Volumetric flow 48.1 m3/h
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
Parameter Result
TA Luft Organics I <6.5 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics II <7.4 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics III <11.1 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
Parameter Result
TA Luft Organics I <6.5 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics II <7.4 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics III <11.1 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2b
Parameter Result
TA Luft Organics I <5.9 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics II <6.8 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics III <10.1 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2c
Parameter Result
TA Luft Organics I <6.3 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics II <7.3 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics III <10.8 mg/m3
Page 4 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
All the sampling points were obtainable Yes
All parameters were sampled Yes
Opinions and interpretations expressed in this report are outside the scope of any claimed UKAS accreditation.EPA requirements AG1 (Safety) and AG2 (Monitoring Guidance Note) were applied during the monitoring.
Additional information
In the event of any breakthrough, a second charcoal tube was placed upstream from one of the mainadsorption tubes for each run.The results of these tubes are included in the report.
Page 5 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
1.3.- Monitoring Results
Emission Point
ReferenceSubstance to be Monitored ELV Result
Uncert (+/-) Units
Date of sampling
Start - End
Times Reference Method Accr.velocity
(m/s)LOD
MP-P1-03 Volumetric flow 48.1 1.4 18/06/2018 11:38-11:40
BS EN 16911-1:2013 Yes7.37n/a m3/h500 m3/h
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
TA Luft Organics I <6.5 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.5 mg/m3n/a mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
TA Luft Organics II
<7.4 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.4 mg/m350 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
TA Luft Organics III
<11.1 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3711.1 mg/m3150 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics I <6.5 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.5 mg/m3n/a mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics II
<7.4 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.4 mg/m350 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics III
<11.1 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3711.1 mg/m3150 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics I <5.9 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.375.9 mg/m3n/a mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics II
<6.8 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.8 mg/m350 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics III
<10.1 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3710.1 mg/m3150 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2c
TA Luft Organics I <6.3 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.3 mg/m3n/a mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2c
TA Luft Organics II
<7.3 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.3 mg/m350 mg/m3
MP-P1-03 Run 2c
TA Luft Organics III
<10.8 n/a 18/06/2018 14:06-14:36
PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3710.8 mg/m3150 mg/m3
TA Luft Organics I-blank
<6.5 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.5 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
Page 6 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Analysis information
TA Luft Organics I Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
TA Luft Organics II Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
TA Luft Organics III Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
Volumetric flow Fitz Scientific
TA Luft Organics II-blank
<7.4 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.4 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
TA Luft Organics III-blank
<11.1 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3711.1 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
TA Luft Organics I-blank
<6.5 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.5 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics II-blank
<7.4 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.4 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics III-blank
<11.1 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3711.1 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
TA Luft Organics I-blank
<5.9 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.375.9 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics II-blank
<6.8 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.8 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics III-blank
<10.1 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3710.1 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2b
TA Luft Organics I-blank
<6.3 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.376.3 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2c
TA Luft Organics II-blank
<7.3 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.377.3 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2c
TA Luft Organics III-blank
<10.8 n/a 18/06/2018 PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this
method will not meet MCERTS requirements
Yes7.3710.8 mg/m3MP-P1-03 Run 2c
Sampling stage carried out as per MCERTS requirementsNo*:
Page 7 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Additional information
* The reported uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%
** Results reported at following Reference Conditions
Reference Conditions
Abatement system and process load
Emission Point Reference Temperature (K) Pressure (KPa) Moisture (%) Oxygen (%)
Monitoring Result Reference Conditions
MP-P1-03 273 101.3 No correctionNo correction
Abatement system In Operation Fuel type and LoadLocation
Carbon Bed Yes As per BatchMP-P1-03 Extraction Process
Page 8 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
1.4.- Operating Information
Emission Point Reference Date Process Type
ProcessDuration Substance CEMS PR Units
MP-P1-03 18/06/2018 n/a 48.1Volumetric flowAir Extraction Batches m3/h
* CEMS: Continuous Emission Monitoring System Results
* PR: Periodic Monitoring Results
Page 9 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03Emission Point Volumetric flowParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 10 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a BackupEmission Point TA Luft Organics IParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 11 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a BackupEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 12 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a BackupEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 13 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a FrontEmission Point TA Luft Organics IParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 14 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a FrontEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 15 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2a FrontEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 16 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2bEmission Point TA Luft Organics IParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 17 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2bEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 18 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2bEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 19 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2cEmission Point TA Luft Organics IParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 20 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2cEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 21 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2/NH3 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
MP-P1-03 Run 2cEmission Point TA Luft Organics IIIParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 22 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0693-01
Y18Q19762
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Takeda Pharma
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Aileen Stack
014672574
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
2.- Part 2
Supporting information
18/06/2018
Laboratory details
TA Luft Organics I
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 9FE
Duncan Campbell
+44 (0)161 874 2400
UKAS 1549Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
TA Luft Organics II
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 9FE
Duncan Campbell
+44 (0)161 874 2400
UKAS 1549Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
TA Luft Organics III
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 9FE
Duncan Campbell
+44 (0)161 874 2400
UKAS 1549Concept Life Sciences - Manchester
Volumetric flow
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Page 23 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Page 24 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Appendix 1:
Sampling personnel used
Substances Monitored
Equipment Checklist References
As an accredited organisation Fitz scientific have implemented procedures to ensure that the requirements of TPS 63 (UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples) are met with regard to samples taken and tested for chemical analysis. As such all samples, when applicable, have been transported in containers, and in an environment, that meet the relevant standard requirements where applicable
Substance Fitz SOPMethod used for Monitoring
TA Luft Organics I PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this method will not meet MCERTS requirements
232
TA Luft Organics II PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this method will not meet MCERTS requirements
232
TA Luft Organics III PD CEN/TS 13649:2014. If stack is wet, or if flue gas temp >40C during adsorption, this method will not meet MCERTS requirements
232
Volumetric flow BS EN 16911-1:2013 122
Stack: MP-P1-03
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
Volumetric flowParameter:
Stack: MP-P1-03 Run 2a Backup
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301623
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIIParameter:
18/06/2018 Technician Name Position Qualification TEs MCERTS no
Aadil Khan Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Jason McGuirk Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
MM11 1120
MM14 1320
Page 25 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301623
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301623
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IParameter:
Stack: MP-P1-03 Run 2a Front
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301625
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301625
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM112
6700301625
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IParameter:
Stack: MP-P1-03 Run 2b
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM135
6700301631
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIIParameter:
Page 26 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM135
6700301631
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM135
6700301631
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IParameter:
Stack: MP-P1-03 Run 2c
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM062
6700301624
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM062
6700301624
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IIParameter:
EM343
n/a
n/a
Miniprobe
EM071
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
EM062
6700301624
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
TA Luft Organics IParameter:
Page 27 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Appendix 2:
Monitoring Information
1
1
7.37
100.52
20.4
0.05
52.1
48.1
48.1
273
101.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
Number of Ports
Number of Points
Average Velocity v'a (m/s)
Average Pressure (KPa)
Average Temperature (ºC)
Stack Diameter (m)
Actual Moisture Flow rate (m3/h)
Moisture Flow rate at STP (m3/h)
Dry Flow rate at STP, Ref O2 (m3/h)
T reference (Deg K)
P reference (KPa)
Isokinetic condition (%)
Oxygen measured (%)
Water vapor (%)
Wet Stack (yes/no) No
Probe Temperature (°C) n/a
Impinger efficiency (%) n/a
Size of Nozzle n/a
MP-P1-03Stack Parameter: Volumetric Flow, TA Luft Organics I, II, III
Max Flow Rate in Licence (m3/h): 500
Page 28 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Diagram of Sampling Location (not to scale)
X
A
MP-P1-03Circular
1
1
ports
points
Point % of Diameter Location (cm) Velocity (m/s) Temperature (ºC)
Traverse Length 0.05 m
Line
1 40.00 2 7.49 20.41
Page 29 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific
Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22.
Takeda Pharma
Visit No: 2Year: 2018
P0693-01Industrial Emissions Licence8100/M120
Monitoring result calculations and uncertainty calculations
Page 30 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Volumetric Flowrate Correction Template BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Takeda Pharma Date of Test 18/06/2018Site gecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. Reference No M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
8100/M119
Stack information:
Stack dimensions
m Stack Area m2 No ports / No pointsSuitable ports
(Y/N)?
Comply with 5 Up / 2 Down?
(Y/N) Pressure kPa Temperature K Moisture % Oxygen %
Circular Stack 0.05 0.001963495 1 Yes YesReference Condition 101.3 273 0 20.9
Rectangular stack 0.00 0.00 0.00 1Stack Conditions 100.5 293.4 0.0 20.90
Actual Value: 0.001963495
PointVelocity m/s (v'a)
Temp degC (ta) Temp K Presssure kPa (Pa)
Flow Rate m3/sec:
Actual Flow rate m3/hr
Moisture Flow rate at STP m3/hr Moisture
Flow rate at STP, Dry m3/hr O2 %
Flow Rate at STP, Dry, Ref O2 m3/hr
1 7.37 20.4 293.4 101 0.01 52.1 48.1 0.0 48.1 20.90 48.1Volumetric flow 7.37 20.40 293.40 100.520 0.01 52.1 48.1 0.0 48.1 20.90 48.1Uncertainty 20.40 293.40 100.520 1.6 1.4 0.0 1.4 20.90 1.4
Maximum volumetric flow as per Licence 500.0 m3/h
Report Number :
Calculation spreadsheet v.54 Page 31 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
v1.4 Oct-16Enter data in orange cells onlyConstantsGas constant 8.314 J/(K.mol)
1990 Pa0.01 Pa
2 % of value0.2 % of range between calibrations
PITOT 0.04 % of rangeSampling probe: Miniprobe 0.68 Pa
Pitot EM071 Water vapour me 0.00 % relativePitot coefficient, K 0.823 0.61 °C CO content meas 0.00 % relativeExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02 1007.6 Pa CO2 content mea 0.00 % relative
0.52 % O2 content measu 0.00 % relative
Duct dimensions Circular RectangularDiameter 0.05 m a mArea 0.0 m2 b m
Area 0.00 m2Uncertainty (%) 0.52 Uncertainty (%) 0.00116889
All Pressures should be entered in Pascals, Pa
Measurement Point Atmospheric Pressure, PaStack Pressure, Pa Static Pressure, Pa meas1, Pa meas2, Pa meas3, Pa meas4, Pa meas5, Pa Delta P, Pa Stack Temperature, C
Water Vapour Content, % CO, ppm CO2, % N2, % O2, % dry molecular wt, g/mol stack molecular wt, g/mol
1 100460 100520 47.700 47.70 20.40 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.842 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.843 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.844 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.845 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.846 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.847 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.848 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.849 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
10 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8411 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8412 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8413 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8414 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8415 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8416 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8417 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8418 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8419 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8420 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
Mean 100460 100520 #DIV/0! 47.70 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 47.70 20.40 0.00 0.0 0.0 79.1 20.9 28.84 28.84
Circular duct Rectangular ductMean velocity 7.37 m/sec Flow rate (stack conditions) 52 m3/hour 0 m3/hour
Standard uncerta 0.10 m/sec 1.4 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 2 m3/hour #DIV/0! m3/hour
Mean density 1.188 kg/m3 Expanded uncert 0.20 m/sec 2.7 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 3.0 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Developed for the STA by David Butterfield & Chris Dimopoulos, NPL
Repeatability of Delta P transducerDrift of Delta P transducerLack of fit of measurement system
Uncertainty calculation for Velocity and Volume Flow Rate Measurement by Pitot tube EN ISO 16911‐1
Characteristics of pressure sensor used for Delta PEnter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Range of Delta P transducerResolution of Delta P transducer
Uncertainty in duct area measurement
Dry gas basis
Uncertainty in stack gas compositionUncertainty in Delta P transducer Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Uncertainty in temperature readout systemUncertainty in atmospheric pressure transducer
Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Calculation spreadsheet v.54
Page 32 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Velocity associated uncertainties
Pitot Tube CoefficientExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02Standard uncertainty (Dimensionless) 0.01
Table 1
Delta P Standard uncertanites^2 Measurement Point SD of the mean of the DP measurements (Standard uncertainty Delta P)^2 u2(Dpi)Velocity (m/s) Standard uncertainty velocity m/s
Sigma DP See Table 1 1 1.0 2.6 7E‐04 7.4 0.22Resolution uncertainty 0.00 2Calibration uncertainty 0.11 3Lack of fit 0.21 4Drift 5.28 5
67
Molar Mass 8u(H2O) 0 9(O2)wet 20.9 10u(O2)wet 0.00 11(CO2)wet 0.0 12u(CO2)wet 0.00 13(CO)wet 0.0 14u(CO)wet 0.00 15Oxygen sensitivity 4.00E‐05 16Water sensitivity 1.00E‐04 17CO2 sensitivity 1.60E‐04 18CO sensitivity 4.00E‐08 19
20standard uncertainty 0.000000 kg/mol 0.00 % of value Average 0.95 2.55265455 7E‐04 7.37 0.219868402
Temperaturestandard uncertainty 0.31 K 0.10 % of value
Stack static pressurestandard uncertainty 0.0 Pa #DIV/0! % of value
Stack pressurestandard uncertainty 1007.6 Pa 1.00 % of value
Stack gas densitystandard uncertainty 0.0120 kg/m3 1.01 % of value
Standard uncertainty of velocity 0.10 m/sec 1.4 % of value
Expanded uncertainty in velocity 0.20 m/sec 2.7 % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.54
Page 33 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Volume flow rate associated uncertainties
Circular duct Rectangular ductArea uncertainty 0.01 m2 #DIV/0! m2
Flow rate standard uncertainty 1 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 2 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 3.0 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.54Page 34 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Lookup tables
Factor Loading Function
Number of measurments dn2 0.8853 0.5914 0.4865 0.436 0.3957 0.378 0.3519 0.337
10 0.32511 0.31512 0.30715 0.28820 0.26825 0.25430 0.24540 0.22750 0.22260 0.21680 0.206
100 0.199
Calculation spreadsheet v.54Page 35 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Swirl Test Record BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Takeda Pharma Date of Test 18/06/2018Site Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. Reference No M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 1 Operator Id MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Sampling Line APoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
1 0.02 47.7 20.4 7.49 <1523456789
101112
Average 47.7 20.4 7.49 #DIV/0!Min 47.7 20.4 7.49 0Max 47.7 20.4 7.49 0
Sampling Line BPoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
123456789
101112
Average #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Min 0 0 0 0Max 0 0 0 0
Calculation spreadsheet v.54Page 36 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Mass Concentation - TA Luft Organics Run 2a Front Tube PD CEN/TS 13649:2014Company Takeda Pharma 18/06/2018Site Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 2 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number: 8100/M119
Laboratory Reference No:
Calibration Air Volume:Calibration flow rate: 210.17 ml/minINITIAL COUNT 646127Post Calibration flow rate: 204.57 ml/minFINAL COUNT 659959
Pump (EM number) EM112 @ 0.495 ml/count
Air Volume Sampled 6.84684 litresTime(min.) 30
Vol air sampled( Vga) 0.0068 m3Stack temperature 293.4 K O2 H2OStack Pressure 100.52 kPa Ref Conditions 20.9 0
Measured 20.90 0.00Vol at STP 0.0063 m3Vol at STP, H20 and O2 Ref 0.0063 m3
Blank Run Result Blank Result Run Result Blank Result RunMass Flow at STP,dry,refO2
CLASS ug ug ug/m3 ug/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 kg/hrAcetone III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Benzene I 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001Carbon Tetrachloride I 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Chloroform I 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Cyclohexane II 20 20 3163.7 3163.7 3.2 3.2 0.00015Cyclohexanone II 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Dichloromethane I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Ethanol III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Ethyl acetate III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Heptane III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Hexane III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008m+p Xylene II 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone III 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004MIBK Methyl isobutyl ketone III 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004o-Xylene II 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001Propan-2-ol III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Tetrachloroethylene I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Tetrahydrofuran THF II 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Toluene II 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Trichloroethylene I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008
TA Luft Organics I 41 41 6485.6 6485.6 6.5 6.5 0.00031TA Luft Organics II 47 47 7434.7 7434.7 7.4 7.4 0.00036TA Luft Organics III 70 70 11072.9 11072.9 11.1 11.1 0.00053
Lab Results Certificate Num Laboratory: Accreditation Analytical MethoDate of AnalysisBlank 1047/195/09 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018Run 1047/195/07 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018
ELV Blank deviation Results (mg/m3) Results breakdown ExceedanceTA Luft Organics I n/a #VALUE! <6.5 <6.5 noTA Luft Organics II 50 TRUE <7.4 <7.4 noTA Luft Organics III 150 FALSE <11.1 <11.1 no
Records of calibration sampling pump:
Date of TestReference NoOperator Id
TE's
Calculation spreadsheet v.54 Page 37 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Mass Concentation - TA Luft Organics Run 2a Backup Tube PD CEN/TS 13649:2014Company Takeda Pharma 18/06/2018Site Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 2 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number: 8100/M119
Laboratory Reference No:
Calibration Air Volume:Calibration flow rate: 210.17 ml/minINITIAL COUNT 646127Post Calibration flow rate: 204.57 ml/minFINAL COUNT 659959
Pump (EM number) EM112 @ 0.495 ml/count
Air Volume Sampled 6.84684 litresTime(min.) 30
Vol air sampled( Vga) 0.0068 m3Stack temperature 293.4 K O2 H2OStack Pressure 100.52 kPa Ref Conditions 20.9 0
Measured 20.90 0.00Vol at STP 0.0063 m3Vol at STP, H20 and O2 Ref 0.0063 m3
Blank Run Result Blank Result Run Result Blank Result RunMass Flow at STP,dry,refO2
CLASS ug ug ug/m3 ug/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 kg/hrAcetone III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Benzene I 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001Carbon Tetrachloride I 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Chloroform I 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Cyclohexane II 20 20 3163.7 3163.7 3.2 3.2 0.00015Cyclohexanone II 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Dichloromethane I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Ethanol III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Ethyl acetate III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Heptane III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Hexane III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008m+p Xylene II 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone III 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004MIBK Methyl isobutyl ketone III 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004o-Xylene II 1 1 158.2 158.2 0.2 0.2 0.00001Propan-2-ol III 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Tetrachloroethylene I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Tetrahydrofuran THF II 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008Toluene II 5 5 790.9 790.9 0.8 0.8 0.00004Trichloroethylene I 10 10 1581.8 1581.8 1.6 1.6 0.00008
TA Luft Organics I 41 41 6485.6 6485.6 6.5 6.5 0.00031TA Luft Organics II 47 47 7434.7 7434.7 7.4 7.4 0.00036TA Luft Organics III 70 70 11072.9 11072.9 11.1 11.1 0.00053
Lab Results Certificate Num Laboratory: Accreditation Analytical MethoDate of AnalysisBlank 1047/195/09 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018Run 1047/195/08 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018
ELV Blank deviation Results (mg/m3) Results breakdown ExceedanceTA Luft Organics I n/a #VALUE! <6.5 <6.5 noTA Luft Organics II 50 TRUE <7.4 <7.4 noTA Luft Organics III 150 FALSE <11.1 <11.1 no
Records of calibration sampling pump:
TE's
Date of TestReference NoOperator Id
Calculation spreadsheet v.54 Page 38 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Mass Concentation - TA Luft Organics Run 2b PD CEN/TS 13649:2014Company Takeda Pharma 18/06/2018Site Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 2 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number: 8100/M119
Laboratory Reference No:
Calibration Air Volume:Calibration flow rate: 196.38 ml/minINITIAL COUNT 37079Post Calibration flow rate: 197.31 ml/minFINAL COUNT 51412
Pump (EM number) EM135 @ 0.526 ml/count
Air Volume Sampled 7.539158 litresTime(min.) 30
Vol air sampled( Vga) 0.0075 m3Stack temperature 293.4 K O2 H2OStack Pressure 100.52 kPa Ref Conditions 20.9 0
Measured 20.90 0.00Vol at STP 0.0070 m3Vol at STP, H20 and O2 Ref 0.0070 m3
Blank Run Result Blank Result Run Result Blank Result RunMass Flow at STP,dry,refO2
CLASS ug ug ug/m3 ug/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 kg/hrAcetone III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Benzene I 1 1 143.7 143.7 0.1 0.1 0.00001Carbon Tetrachloride I 5 5 718.3 718.3 0.7 0.7 0.00003Chloroform I 5 5 718.3 718.3 0.7 0.7 0.00003Cyclohexane II 20 20 2873.2 2873.2 2.9 2.9 0.00014Cyclohexanone II 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Dichloromethane I 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Ethanol III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Ethyl acetate III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Heptane III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Hexane III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007m+p Xylene II 1 1 143.7 143.7 0.1 0.1 0.00001MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone III 5 5 718.3 718.3 0.7 0.7 0.00003MIBK Methyl isobutyl ketone III 5 5 718.3 718.3 0.7 0.7 0.00003o-Xylene II 1 1 143.7 143.7 0.1 0.1 0.00001Propan-2-ol III 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Tetrachloroethylene I 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Tetrahydrofuran THF II 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007Toluene II 5 5 718.3 718.3 0.7 0.7 0.00003Trichloroethylene I 10 10 1436.6 1436.6 1.4 1.4 0.00007
TA Luft Organics I 41 41 5890.0 5890.0 5.9 5.9 0.00028TA Luft Organics II 47 47 6752.0 6752.0 6.8 6.8 0.00032TA Luft Organics III 70 70 10056.1 10056.1 10.1 10.1 0.00048
Lab Results Certificate Num Laboratory: Accreditation Analytical MethoDate of AnalysisBlank 1047/195/09 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018Run 1047/195/06 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018
ELV Blank deviation Results (mg/m3) Results breakdown ExceedanceTA Luft Organics I n/a #VALUE! <5.9 <5.9 noTA Luft Organics II 50 TRUE <6.8 <6.8 noTA Luft Organics III 150 FALSE <10.1 <10.1 no
Records of calibration sampling pump:
Date of TestReference NoOperator Id
TE's
Calculation spreadsheet v.54 Page 39 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Fitz Scientific8100/M119Yar: 2018 Visit no: 2_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Takeda PharmaIndustrial Emissions Licence P0693-01
Mass Concentation - TA Luft Organics Run 2c PD CEN/TS 13649:2014Company Takeda Pharma 18/06/2018Site Grangecastle Business Park, Nangor Road, Dublin 22. M119Plant Identification MP-P1-03 Run 2 MM11 1120Test carried out by Aadil Khan TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4Report Number: 8100/M119
Laboratory Reference No:
Calibration Air Volume:Calibration flow rate: 227.47 ml/minINITIAL COUNT 181801Post Calibration flow rate: 215.83 ml/minFINAL COUNT 195433
Pump (EM number) EM062 @ 0.515 ml/count
Air Volume Sampled 7.02048 litresTime(min.) 30
Vol air sampled( Vga) 0.0070 m3Stack temperature 293.4 K O2 H2OStack Pressure 100.52 kPa Ref Conditions 20.9 0
Measured 20.90 0.00Vol at STP 0.0065 m3Vol at STP, H20 and O2 Ref 0.0065 m3
Blank Run Result Blank Result Run Result Blank Result RunMass Flow at STP,dry,refO2
CLASS ug ug ug/m3 ug/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 kg/hrAcetone III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Benzene I 1 1 154.3 154.3 0.2 0.2 0.00001Carbon Tetrachloride I 5 5 771.4 771.4 0.8 0.8 0.00004Chloroform I 5 5 771.4 771.4 0.8 0.8 0.00004Cyclohexane II 20 20 3085.4 3085.4 3.1 3.1 0.00015Cyclohexanone II 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Dichloromethane I 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Ethanol III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Ethyl acetate III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Heptane III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Hexane III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007m+p Xylene II 1 1 154.3 154.3 0.2 0.2 0.00001MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone III 5 5 771.4 771.4 0.8 0.8 0.00004MIBK Methyl isobutyl ketone III 5 5 771.4 771.4 0.8 0.8 0.00004o-Xylene II 1 1 154.3 154.3 0.2 0.2 0.00001Propan-2-ol III 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Tetrachloroethylene I 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Tetrahydrofuran THF II 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007Toluene II 5 5 771.4 771.4 0.8 0.8 0.00004Trichloroethylene I 10 10 1542.7 1542.7 1.5 1.5 0.00007
TA Luft Organics I 41 41 6325.2 6325.2 6.3 6.3 0.00030TA Luft Organics II 47 47 7250.8 7250.8 7.3 7.3 0.00035TA Luft Organics III 70 70 10799.1 10799.1 10.8 10.8 0.00052
Lab Results Certificate Num Laboratory: Accreditation Analytical MethoDate of AnalysisBlank 1047/195/09 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018Run 1047/195/05 CLS - Manchester ISO 17025 GCMS 28/06/2018
ELV Blank deviation Results (mg/m3) Results breakdown ExceedanceTA Luft Organics I n/a #VALUE! <6.3 <6.3 noTA Luft Organics II 50 TRUE <7.3 <7.3 noTA Luft Organics III 150 FALSE <10.8 <10.8 no
Records of calibration sampling pump:
Date of TestReference NoOperator Id
TE's
Calculation spreadsheet v.54 Page 40 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Concept Life Sciences
Certificate of Analysis
Hadfield HouseHadfield Street
CornbrookManchester
M16 9FETel : 0161 874 2400Fax : 0161 874 2404
Report Number: 746212-1
Date of Report: 26-Jun-2018
Customer: Fitz ScientificUnit 35Boyne Business ParkDroghedaCo LouthA92 D52D
Customer Contact: . Reports
Customer Job Reference:Customer Purchase Order: FS1069
Date Job Received at Concept: 21-Jun-2018Date Analysis Started: 22-Jun-2018
Date Analysis Completed: 26-Jun-2018
The results reported relate to samples received in the laboratory and may not be representative of a wholebatch.Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of UKAS accreditationThis report should not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratoryTests covered by this certificate were conducted in accordance with Concept Life Sciences SOPsAll results have been reviewed in accordance with Section 25 of the Concept Life Sciences, AnalyticalServices Quality Manual
This document has been printed from a digitally signed master copy
Concept Life Sciences is a trading name of
Concept Life Sciences Analytical & Development
Services Limited registered in England and
Wales (No 2514788)
1549
Report checkedand authorised by :Kathryn GleavesCustomer Service Advisor
Issued by :Kathryn GleavesCustomer Service Advisor
Page 1 of 3
746212-1Page 41 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Concept Reference: 746212
Customer Reference:
Tube (Charcoal 226-09) Analysed as Tube (Charcoal 226-09)
VOC Suite
Concept Reference 746212 001 746212 002 746212 003 746212 004 746212 005
Customer Sample Reference 1047/195/01 FRONT 1047/195/01 BACK 1047/195/02 FRONT 1047/195/02 BACK 1047/195/03 FRONT
Test Sample AR AR AR AR AR
Date Sampled 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018
Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol
Propan-2-ol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Acetone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Benzene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Carbon tetrachloride GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Chloroform GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Cyclohexane GC/MS 20 µg U <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Cyclohexanone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Dichloromethane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethanol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethyl acetate GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Heptane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Hexane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Meta/Para-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Ortho-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Methyl ethyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Methyl iso butyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Tetrachloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Tetrahydrofuran GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Toluene GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Trichloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Concept Reference: 746212
Customer Reference:
Tube (Charcoal 226-09) Analysed as Tube (Charcoal 226-09)
VOC Suite
Concept Reference 746212 006 746212 007 746212 008 746212 009 746212 010
Customer Sample Reference 1047/195/03 BACK 1047/195/04 FRONT 1047/195/04 BACK 1047/195/05 FRONT 1047/195/05 BACK
Test Sample AR AR AR AR AR
Date Sampled 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018
Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol
Propan-2-ol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Acetone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Benzene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Carbon tetrachloride GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Chloroform GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Cyclohexane GC/MS 20 µg U <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Cyclohexanone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Dichloromethane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethanol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethyl acetate GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Heptane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Hexane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Meta/Para-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Ortho-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Methyl ethyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Methyl iso butyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Tetrachloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Tetrahydrofuran GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Toluene GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Trichloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
This document has been printed from a digitally signed master copy
Produced by Concept Life Sciences, Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Cornbrook, Manchester, M16 9FE Page 2 of 3
746212-1Page 42 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33
Index to symbols used in 746212-1
Concept Reference: 746212
Customer Reference:
Tube (Charcoal 226-09) Analysed as Tube (Charcoal 226-09)
VOC Suite
Concept Reference 746212 011 746212 012 746212 013 746212 014 746212 015
Customer Sample Reference 1047/195/06 FRONT 1047/195/06 BACK 1047/195/07 FRONT 1047/195/07 BACK 1047/195/08 FRONT
Test Sample AR AR AR AR AR
Date Sampled 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018
Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol
Propan-2-ol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Acetone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Benzene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Carbon tetrachloride GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Chloroform GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Cyclohexane GC/MS 20 µg U <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
Cyclohexanone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Dichloromethane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethanol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Ethyl acetate GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Heptane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Hexane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Meta/Para-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Ortho-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Methyl ethyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Methyl iso butyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Tetrachloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Tetrahydrofuran GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Toluene GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Trichloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
Concept Reference: 746212
Customer Reference:
Tube (Charcoal 226-09) Analysed as Tube (Charcoal 226-09)
VOC Suite
Concept Reference 746212 016 746212 017 746212 018
Customer Sample Reference 1047/195/08 BACK 1047/195/09 FRONT 1047/195/09 BACK
Test Sample AR AR AR
Date Sampled 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018 18-JUN-2018
Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol
Propan-2-ol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Acetone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Benzene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1
Carbon tetrachloride GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5
Chloroform GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5
Cyclohexane GC/MS 20 µg U <20 <20 <20
Cyclohexanone GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Dichloromethane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Ethanol GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Ethyl acetate GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Heptane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Hexane GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Meta/Para-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1
Ortho-Xylene GC/MS 1 µg U <1 <1 <1
Methyl ethyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5
Methyl iso butyl ketone GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5
Tetrachloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Tetrahydrofuran GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Toluene GC/MS 5 µg U <5 <5 <5
Trichloroethylene GC/MS 10 µg U <10 <10 <10
Value Description
AR As Received
U Analysis is UKAS accredited
This document has been printed from a digitally signed master copy
Produced by Concept Life Sciences, Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Cornbrook, Manchester, M16 9FE Page 3 of 3
746212-1Page 43 of 43
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 24-09-2018:03:34:33