Upload
semra
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CORRESPONDENCE
Tailored thromboprophylaxis for patients with multiple myelomatreated by IMIDs
SEMRA PAYDAS
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
(Received 2 April 2008; revised 3 May 2008; accepted 6 May 2008)
It is known that thrombo-embolic (TE) events are
one of the most important complications of immuno-
modulatory drugs used in multiple myeloma (MM).
For this reason, thrombo-prophylaxis is very impor-
tant according to the TE risk categories. I read with
great interest of the paper published by Niesvizky
et al. in this journal [1]. This study reported the use
of low-dose aspirin as primary prophylaxis in three
series of patients with MM treated by thalidomide or
lenalidomide containing regimens. In these studies
median age was at the beginning of the 60s and they
had good KPS (70 or higher). In study I, thalidomide
dose was 50–200 mg, dexamethasone dose was
40 mg once a week and chlarithromycin 500 mg
twice a day. Before the use of aspirin, grade II and
III–IV thrombosis developed in 8% and 15% of the
cases, respectively. TEs did not develop in subse-
quent cases receiving aspirin. In study II, thalido-
mide dose was 50–200 mg and dexamethasone dose
was standard (40 mg daily for 12 days in 1 month).
In this cohort, patients randomised into two groups
to receive either aspirin or not in conjunction with
thalidomide or chemotherapy alone. TE developed
in 21.4% of the cases not receiving aspirin and in 1 of
15 cases (6.6%) treated by aspirin. In study III,
patients received standard dose lenalidomide and
relatively low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg 6 days in
first cycle and then 4 days monthly) and daily
chlarithromycin and low-dose aspirin. TE occurred
in nine (12.5%) of the cases and five of these were
interrupted aspirin. Cases with TE were treated by
full-dose low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or
unfractionated heparin.
In this report, authors concluded that low-dose
aspirin appears to reduce the incidence of thrombo-
sis, and may be an adequate agent for prophylaxis,
except poor compliance, in cases treated by thalido-
mide or lenalidomide. However, two excellent re-
views were published recently [2,3], in one of them
[2] Niesvizky is one of the authors. In these reviews,
it has been proposed that:
1. The goal of thrombo-prophylaxis should be to
reduce the frequency of deep vein thrombosis to
less than 10%.
2. Thromboprophylaxis is strongly recommended
in cases receiving thalidomide combinations but
not thalidomide alone.
3. Thromboprophylaxis should be given according
to the presence of the risk factors which increase
the risk of TE. Risk factors associated with
patients are: age, obesity, co-morbid conditions
(including infection, diabetes mellitus, cardio-
vascular disease), surgical procedures, history of
TE or inherited thrombophilia, central venous
catheter. MM-related risk factors are MM
diagnosis, hyper-viscosity and high tumor bur-
den. Therapy-related risk factors are high-dose
dexamethasone, doxorubicin and multi-agent
chemotherapy.
According to these reviews, authors’ proposals are:
(1) There are no data to suggest that one antic-
oagulant is better than another. (2) Although aspirin
use is easy in daily practice, the rate of TE is relatively
high in particular conditions. (3) Until further
Correspondence: Semra Paydas, Faculty of Medicine, Dept of Oncology, Cukurova University, ADANA, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Leukemia & Lymphoma, August 2008; 49(8): 1644–1645
ISSN 1042-8194 print/ISSN 1029-2403 online � 2008 Informa UK Ltd.
DOI: 10.1080/10428190802187155
Leu
k L
ymph
oma
Dow
nloa
ded
from
info
rmah
ealth
care
.com
by
Tuf
ts U
nive
rsity
on
11/1
4/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
evidence becomes available, aspirin should only be
recommended for patients with low risk of TE. (4)
Evidence of patients with high risk, supports the use
of LMWH or full-dose aspirin. (5) The use of
warfarin is limited due to its long half-life in patients
with concomitant thrombocytopenia. LMWH is
appropriate option because of its short half-life and
the decreased risk of secondary bleeding. Shortly,
panel recommends aspirin for patients with one risk
factor for TE and LMWH for cases with two or more
individual and/or MM risk factors. LMWH is
recommended for all patients receiving high-dose
dexamethasone or doxorubicin. Full-dose warfarin
targeting as therapeutic INR of 2–3 is an alternative
to LMWH although there are limited data in the
literature regarding this strategy.
As mentioned before, in studies reported by
Palumbo et al., [2,3] patients were relatively young
and had good PS. Also dexamethasone dose used
was relatively lower than standard high-dose regi-
mens, except cohort II. Although there are no data
about the co-morbid conditions and tumor burden,
these points are important due to the low-risk patient
characteristics in this article. In fact, as suggested by
the panel members, these patients are of low-risk
category and low-dose aspirin is enough for these
cases; however, it is not appropriate to recommend
low-dose aspirin for patients receiving thalidomide/
lenalidomide combinations without tailored
thrombo-prophylaxis.
Ongoing studies will determine what will be the
most appropriate TE prophylaxis in cases treated by
thalidomide/lenalidomide combinations in cases with
MM.
References
1. Niesvizky R, Martinez D, Jalbrzikowski J, Christos P, Furst J,
Sancho M, et al. Prophylactic low-dose aspirin is effective
antithrombotic therapy for combination treatments of thalido-
mide or lenalidomide in myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2007;
48:2330–2337.
2. Palumbo A, Facon T, Sonnoveld P, Blade J, Offidani M,
Gay F, et al. Thalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma.
Blood. 2008;111:3968–3977.
3. Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Richardson PG,
San Miguel J, Barlogie B, et al. Prevention of thalidomide- and
lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia
2008;22:414–423.
Correspondence 1645
Leu
k L
ymph
oma
Dow
nloa
ded
from
info
rmah
ealth
care
.com
by
Tuf
ts U
nive
rsity
on
11/1
4/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.