Upload
nguyen-khanh-minh
View
695
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TI LIU VECM
I. GII THIU M HNH VECM
I.1. Hi quy gi mo
Hu ht cc chui thi gian trong kinh t v m c xu hng v do trong hu ht
nhng trng hp l chui khng dng (v d GDP, FDI). Vn ca chui thi gian
khng dng hay c xu hng l hi quy OLS c th dn n nhng kt lun khng
chnh xc. Theo Asteriou, trong nhng trng hp ny kt qu hi quy c R2 cao v c
gi tr t cao nhng cc bin c s dng trong phn tch khng c gi tr gii thch.
Asteriou ni r nhiu chui thi gian kinh t c bit c t l tng trng c bn, c th
l hng s hoc khng, v d GDP, gi, cung tin c xu hng tng trng theo hng
nm. Nhng chui thi gian nh vy l khng dng v trung bnh tip tc tng theo thi
gian tuy nhin nhng chui ny li khng c ng lin kt m sai phn ca n c th
dng theo thi gian. y l mt trong nhng l do chnh ca vic ly log cc d liu
trc khi tin hnh phn tch.
Hi quy gia hai chui d liu khng lin quan (v khng dng) iu m chng ta nhn
c qua h s R2 cao chng qua th hin xu th cng nhau (hoc tri ngc nhau) ca
hai chui d liu. Mc d R2 c th cao nhng kt qu c th khng c ngha kinh t.
Bi v cc c lng ca OLS c th khng bn vng theo thi gian, v do cc kim
nh thng k c suy ra t m hnh l khng c gi tr.
Granger v Newbold (1974) s dng phn tch m phng Monter Carlo to ra mt
lng ln cc chui Yt v Xt c nghim n v theo dng sau:
yttt eYY 1
xttt eXX 1
thnh phn eyt v ext l do my t ng to mt cch ngu nhin.
V chui d liu Yt v Xt l c lp vi nhau nn bt k hi quy no gia chng cng
dn n kt qu khng chnh xc. Tuy nhin, khi h hi quy rt nhiu Yt khc nhau theo
Xt th kt qu l h bc b gi thit Ho l h s ca Xt bng khng vi khong 75%
trng hp. H cng tm ra rng cc phng trnh hi quy ca h c R2 rt cao v DW
thp.
I.2. Gii thch vn hi quy gi mo.
Theo Asteriou, ngun gc ca vn hi quy gi mo n t thc t X v Y l hai chui
khng dng, do s kt hp tuyn tnh ca chng (phn d ca pt hi quy) c th
khng dng. Nu iu ny xy ra th khi kt hp X v Y trong mt phng trnh hi
quy, chng ta vi phm nhng gi nh c bn ca OLS. Nu phn d l khng dng,
chng ta k vng rng theo thi gian rt cuc nhng phn d ny cng s ln ln.
Nhng ti sao OLS li c kt qu R2 cao, l v OLS la chn nhng thng s sao cho
cc tng phn d bnh phng l b nht.
I.3. ng lin kt
Khi nim v ng lin kt c Granger nhc n u tin v sau c cc tc
gi khc nghin cu k hn. Cc chui thi gian trong kinh t gy ra mt vn kh
khn tim tng trong nghin cu kinh t lng thc nghim v vn hi quy gi mo.
Mt cch gii quyt vn l ly sai phn ca chui cho n khi no tnh dng
t c th dng li. Tuy nhin, tng ny khng phi l ti u v chng ta s mt i
tnh di hn, nhng thng tin di hn qu gi ca chui d liu.
Mt s kt hp tuyn tnh ca hai chui d liu khng dng thng thng s c k
vng l khng dng. Tuy nhin, v tnh cht c bit, trong mt s trng hp nht nh,
chng ta k vng rng chng s di chuyn cng nhau v do s kt hp ca hai chui
ny l dng. Trong nhng trng hp nh vy, ta gi hai chui d liu ny l c tnh
ng lin kt.
Kim nh ng lin kt
Kim inh ng lin kt theo phng php Jonhansen
Mc tiu: Xc nh s t hp tuyn tnh ca mt s bin khng dng vi mt s bin
dng, t cho thy tn ti bao nhiu mi quan h cn bng trong di hn
Trong phng trnh ng lin kt ny, bin Yit c th c trung bnh khc 0, c th c
xu hng. Do , phng trnh ng lin kt c th c thm h s chn v tnh xu th:
Cc trng hp kim nh
3.1. Kim nh Trace Statistics
Gi thuyt H0: C nhiu nht r mi quan h ng lin kt (r = 0, 1, 2, , k-1)
H1: C m mi quan h ng lin kt
Kt qu thng k s tun theo kim nh: LRtr = - n log(1 )=+1
Vi l cc gi tr ring c sp xp theo th t t ln n nh nht.
3.2. Kim nh Maximum Eigenvalue
Gi thuyt H0: C nhiu nht r mi quan h ng lin kt (r = 0, 1, 2, , k-1)
H1: C m mi quan h ng lin kt
Kt qu thng k s theo kim nh: LRmax ( + 1) = - n. log(1 )
= LRtr ( + 1 ) LRtr( )
I.4. M hnh VECM (Vector Error Correcrtion Model):
Khi xem xt mt chui cc bin khng dng chng ta cn thn trng khi m t mi
quan h gia cc bin ny. Mi quan h ny ph thuc nhiu vo tnh cht dng ca
mi bin. Gi s nu 2 bin khng dng ny u l 2 chui tch hp cng bc p, iu
ny c th hm cho vic xem xt mt mi quan h cn bng di hn gia 2 bin ny.
Khi nim ng tch hp (Cointegration) c a ra m t cho mi quan h ny.
V mt kinh t lng, hai hoc nhiu bin quan st c mi quan h ng tch hp vi
nhau c ngha l cc bin ny c cng bc tch hp (u l cc chui I(p)) v tn ti mt
t hp tuyn tnh ca cc bin ny l mt chui dng (I(0)).
Hai chui {y1,t} v {y2,t} l ng tch hp nu:
{y1,t} v {y2,t} u l chui tch hp bc p: I(p)
Tn ti mt b s (a1,a2) khng ng thi bng 0 sao cho: a1*y1,t +a2*y2,t l mt chui
dng: I(0).
M hnh VECM l mt trong nhng m hnh c a ra quan st mi quan h ng
tch hp ny gia cc chui thi gian. Gi s hai chui y1,t v y2,t l 2 chui tch hp
bc 1, ta s dng m hnh VAR dng rt gn( reduced form VAR) m t mi quan
h gia 2 bin ny: Yt= A0+ A1*Yt-1+ A2*Yt-2+ Et (*)
Vi = [1,
2,] ma trn cc bin
= [,11 ,12,21 ,22
] ma trn h s bin Yt-1 v Yt-2
= [1,2,
], ma trn sai s mi phng trnh.
Phng trnh (*) c bin i thnh:
Yt= A0+ (-I+A1+A2)*Yt-1 - A2*Yt-1+ Et (**)
Vi gi nh rng Et l chui dng, ta nhn thy v tri ca phng trnh (**) l mt
chui dng, cc hng t bn phi cng phi l chui dng. do , (-I+A1A2)*Yt-1 phi
l chui dng hay mt t hp tuyn tnh ca y1,t v y2,t l mt chui dng. Vy y1,t v
y2,t c quan h ng tch hp.
M hnh VAR c biu din di dng phng trnh (**) c gi l m hnh VECM.
Phng trnh (**) s c vit di dng h phng trnh nh sau:
y1,t y1,t-1= a1,0+ 1*(y1,t-1+*y2,t-1) +1,t
y2,t - y2,t-1 = a2,0 +2*(y1,t-1+*y2,t-1) +2,t
ngha m hnh:
H s trong ngoc n biu hin mi quan h di hn gia 2 bin y1,t v y2,t, h s
1, 2 th hin cho c ch iu chnh trong ngn hn.
II. THC HNH:
Bi nghin cu ca GEORGE FILIS, University of Portsmouth, UK Department of
Economics Macro economy, stock market and oil prices: Do meaningful relationships
exist among their cyclical fluctuations?
Xem xt mi quan h gia ch s gi hng tiu dng, sn lng cng nghip, th trng
chng khong v gi du.
Ngun d liu:
Consumer price index (CPI): http://www.elibrary-data.imf.org
Industrial production (IP): www.gso.gov.vn
Ch s th trng chng khon (vni): http://www.cophieu68.vn
Gi du Vit Nam (oil): http://www.eia.gov
Kim tra tnh dng v khc phc tnh khng
dng
Chn tr ti u
Kim nh s ph hp ca m hnh
X l d liu
Kim tra ng lin kt bng phng php
Johansen
c lng m hnh VECM
II.1. Kim tra tnh dng v khc phc tnh khng dng
Chui d liu ADF test
Ch s CPI LCPI -2.607041
DLCPI -3.297289***
Ch s th trng chng khon LVNI -1.939163
DLVNI -7.184180***
Sn lng cng nghip LIP -1.741453
DLIP -9.080271***
Gi du LOIL -3.012252
DLOIL -8.427109***
II.2. La chn tr ti u
VAR Lag Order Selection
Criteria
Endogenous variables: DLCPI DLIP DLOIL
DLVNI
Exogenous variables: C
Date: 10/31/13 Time: 15:16
Sample: 2001M01 2012M07
Included observations: 130
Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ
0 730.3428 NA 1.65e-10 -11.17450 -11.08627 -11.13865
1 802.0559 137.9098 7.00e-11 -12.03163 -11.59047* -11.85237*
2 824.3699 41.53838 6.35e-11 -12.12877 -11.33468 -11.80610
3 840.2817 28.64125 6.37e-11 -12.12741 -10.98040 -11.66134
4 862.8875 39.29925 5.78e-11* -12.22904* -10.72910 -11.61956
5 874.3701 19.25538 6.23e-11 -12.15954 -10.30667 -11.40666
6 890.1483 25.48786 6.30e-11 -12.15613 -9.950331 -11.25984
7 901.9935 18.40569 6.79e-11 -12.09221 -9.533485 -11.05251
8 923.5770 32.20928* 6.32e-11 -12.17811 -9.266458 -10.99501
* indicates lag order selected by the criterion
LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5%
level)
FPE: Final prediction error
AIC: Akaike information
criterion
SC: Schwarz information
criterion
HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion
Kt qu kim nh cho thy c 2 tr c th la chn c cho m hnh.
Tiu ch la chn tr 2 tr 4
Log likelihood 860.223 882.129
Akaike information
criterion
-
12.1209
-
12.15118
Schwarz criterion -
11.3499
-
10.68063
La chn tr theo tiu ch AIC (cng nh cng tt)
Chn m hnh c tr l 4
II.3. Kim tra ng lin kt
Date: 10/31/13 Time: 15:31
Sample (adjusted): 2001M06 2012M07
Included observations: 134 after adjustments
Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend
Series: LVNI LOIL LIP LCPI
Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 4
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)
Hypothesize
d Trace 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic
Critical
Value Prob.**
None * 0.223392 56.25245 47.85613 0.0067
At most 1 0.098107 22.37455 29.79707 0.2781
At most 2 0.061727 8.537852 15.49471 0.4098
At most 3 6.80E-07 9.11E-05 3.841466 0.9937
Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)
Hypothesize
d Max-Eigen 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic
Critical
Value Prob.**
None * 0.223392 33.87790 27.58434 0.0068
At most 1 0.098107 13.83670 21.13162 0.3786
At most 2 0.061727 8.537761 14.26460 0.3266
At most 3 6.80E-07 9.11E-05 3.841466 0.9937
Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*S11*b=I):
LVNI LOIL LIP LCPI
0.078440 6.106480 -13.99563 11.47242
-1.321390 3.409494 4.358944 -7.333008
2.741121 -0.197409 -1.783819 0.980584
0.152699 -1.076814 -2.188147 7.297085
Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha):
D(LVNI) -0.006112 0.015993 -0.012259 -3.74E-05
D(LOIL) -0.033316 -0.008916 -0.000874 -1.99E-05
D(LIP) 0.021421 -0.013430 0.003697 -8.38E-05
D(LCPI) -0.001071 0.001077 0.001045 -9.67E-07
1 Cointegrating
Equation(s):
Log
likelihood 899.0679
Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)
LVNI LOIL LIP LCPI
1.000000 77.84883 -178.4241 146.2568
(15.2429) (31.7633) (32.5334)
Adjustment coefficients (standard error in
parentheses)
D(LVNI) -0.000479
(0.00062)
D(LOIL) -0.002613
(0.00053)
D(LIP) 0.001680
(0.00086)
D(LCPI) -8.40E-05
(4.3E-05)
2 Cointegrating
Equation(s):
Log
likelihood 905.9863
Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)
LVNI LOIL LIP LCPI
1.000000 0.000000 -8.916929 10.06348
(2.09338) (2.89323)
0.000000 1.000000 -2.177389 1.749459
(0.26469) (0.36583)
Adjustment coefficients (standard error in
parentheses)
D(LVNI) -0.021613 0.017209
(0.01027) (0.05424)
D(LOIL) 0.009169 -0.233844
(0.00885) (0.04674)
D(LIP) 0.019426 0.085020
(0.01444) (0.07630)
D(LCPI) -0.001507 -0.002868
(0.00071) (0.00377)
3 Cointegrating
Equation(s):
Log
likelihood 910.2552
Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)
LVNI LOIL LIP LCPI
1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 -0.470280
(0.52453)
0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 -0.822737
(0.24526)
0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 -1.181321
(0.11217)
Adjustment coefficients (standard error in
parentheses)
D(LVNI) -0.055215 0.019629 0.177116
(0.02335) (0.05367) (0.11328)
D(LOIL) 0.006772 -0.233671 0.428973
(0.02034) (0.04676) (0.09869)
D(LIP) 0.029560 0.084291 -0.364939
(0.03319) (0.07629) (0.16101)
D(LCPI) 0.001357 -0.003074 0.017821
(0.00161) (0.00371) (0.00783)
C 1 ng lin kt gia cc chui d liu
Tin hnh c lng m hnh VECM
Vi phng trnh tc ng trong di hn l:
LCPI LIP LOIL LVNI
1.000000 -1.219937 0.532275 0.006837
(0.09346) (0.10055) (0.04380)
II.4. Kt qu c lng m hnh
Vector Error Correction Estimates
Date: 10/31/13 Time: 17:46
Sample (adjusted): 2001M06 2012M07
Included observations: 134 after adjustments
Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]
Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1
LCPI(-1) 1.000000
LIP(-1) -1.219937
(0.09346)
[-13.0529]
LOIL(-1) 0.532275
(0.10055)
[ 5.29388]
LVNI(-1) 0.006837
(0.04380)
[ 0.15611]
C 5.993503
Error Correction: D(LCPI) D(LIP) D(LOIL) D(LVNI)
CointEq1 -0.012287 0.245755 -0.382215 -0.070114
(0.00629) (0.12597) (0.07726) (0.09059)
[-1.95315] [ 1.95093] [-4.94690] [-0.77397]
D(LCPI(-1)) 0.492594 -0.560612 1.769106 -2.004029
(0.08639) (1.72983) (1.06101) (1.24402)
[ 5.70203] [-0.32408] [ 1.66738] [-1.61093]
D(LCPI(-2)) 0.264656 0.402542 0.605428 0.385192
(0.08851) (1.77227) (1.08704) (1.27454)
[ 2.99016] [ 0.22713] [ 0.55695] [ 0.30222]
D(LCPI(-3)) 0.065059 -0.638686 -0.150521 0.707015
(0.08907) (1.78356) (1.09397) (1.28266)
[ 0.73041] [-0.35810] [-0.13759] [ 0.55121]
D(LCPI(-4)) -0.155269 -0.270705 -0.500495 -0.645624
(0.08122) (1.62640) (0.99757) (1.16964)
[-1.91161] [-0.16644] [-0.50171] [-0.55199]
D(LIP(-1)) 0.004924 -0.649981 -0.373130 -0.072329
(0.00790) (0.15818) (0.09702) (0.11375)
[ 0.62337] [-4.10917] [-3.84589] [-0.63583]
D(LIP(-2)) 0.015681 -0.455581 -0.276572 -0.038659
(0.00794) (0.15894) (0.09748) (0.11430)
[ 1.97564] [-2.86644] [-2.83708] [-0.33822]
D(LIP(-3)) 0.000981 -0.264169 -0.132204 0.043312
(0.00734) (0.14703) (0.09018) (0.10574)
[ 0.13359] [-1.79672] [-1.46598] [ 0.40962]
D(LIP(-4)) -0.017828 -0.152738 -0.038492 0.059864
(0.00511) (0.10238) (0.06280) (0.07363)
[-3.48680] [-1.49184] [-0.61296] [ 0.81306]
D(LOIL(-1)) 0.012902 0.092937 0.255990 -0.022084
(0.00693) (0.13880) (0.08514) (0.09982)
[ 1.86124] [ 0.66957] [ 3.00685] [-0.22123]
D(LOIL(-2)) -0.008013 -0.221815 0.156534 0.213370
(0.00721) (0.14438) (0.08856) (0.10383)
[-1.11129] [-1.53635] [ 1.76765] [ 2.05500]
D(LOIL(-3)) -0.002035 0.027888 0.042844 0.152239
(0.00733) (0.14684) (0.09006) (0.10560)
[-0.27753] [ 0.18992] [ 0.47571] [ 1.44168]
D(LOIL(-4)) 0.020618 -0.074280 0.044075 -0.211562
(0.00716) (0.14339) (0.08795) (0.10312)
[ 2.87921] [-0.51801] [ 0.50113] [-2.05157]
D(LVNI(-1)) -0.009775 0.180805 -0.034609 0.489179
(0.00628) (0.12584) (0.07718) (0.09050)
[-1.55539] [ 1.43682] [-0.44840] [ 5.40551]
D(LVNI(-2)) -0.003210 -0.019337 0.129554 -0.092461
(0.00694) (0.13893) (0.08522) (0.09992)
[-0.46262] [-0.13918] [ 1.52029] [-0.92539]
D(LVNI(-3)) 0.001064 0.044087 -0.140562 -0.191376
(0.00695) (0.13911) (0.08533) (0.10004)
[ 0.15314] [ 0.31692] [-1.64735] [-1.91293]
D(LVNI(-4)) -0.004822 0.010309 -0.048126 0.068976
(0.00626) (0.12543) (0.07693) (0.09020)
[-0.76977] [ 0.08219] [-0.62556] [ 0.76468]
C 0.002258 0.036300 0.000517 0.010910
(0.00085) (0.01693) (0.01038) (0.01218)
[ 2.67075] [ 2.14404] [ 0.04975] [ 0.89603]
R-squared 0.562785 0.503426 0.336555 0.320523
Adj. R-squared 0.498710 0.430652 0.239327 0.220945
Sum sq. resids 0.004674 1.874013 0.705023 0.969210
S.E. equation 0.006348 0.127103 0.077960 0.091407
F-statistic 8.783265 6.917675 3.461474 3.218801
Log likelihood 497.5228 95.93600 161.4356 140.1129
Akaike AIC -7.157057 -1.163224 -2.140831 -1.822580
Schwarz SC -6.767795 -0.773962 -1.751568 -1.433318
Mean dependent 0.007348 0.010970 0.008371 0.000966
S.D. dependent 0.008965 0.168449 0.089387 0.103561
Determinant resid covariance (dof
adj.) 3.11E-11
Determinant resid covariance 1.75E-11
Log likelihood 899.0679
Akaike information criterion -12.28460
Schwarz criterion -10.64105
Trong :
Tc hiu chnh trong ngn hn:
ECM(-1)=DLCPI(-1) 1.2199*DLIP(-1) + 0.5323*DLOIL(-1) + 0.0068*DLVNI(-1)
+ 5.9935
Phng trnh ECM ca tng bin:
D(DLCPI)=-0.0019*(DLCPI(-1)-17.6787*DLIP(-1) + 1.7175*DLOIL(-
1) + 1.1329*DLVNI(-1) + 0.16833)-0.3562*D(DLCPI(-1))-
0.0825*D(DLCPI(-2))-0.0066*D(DLCPI(-3))-0.1483*D(DLCPI(-4)) -
0.0155*D(DLIP(-1)) + 0.0089*D(DLIP(-2)) + 0.0133*D(DLIP(-3)) -
0.0026*D(DLIP(-4)) + 0.0141*D(DLOIL(-1)) + 0.0019*D(DLOIL(-2)) -
0.005*D(DLOIL(-3)) + 0.0102*D(DLOIL(-4)) - 0.0072*D(DLVNI(-1)) -
0.0064*D(DLVNI(-2)) - 0.0033*D(DLVNI(-3)) - 0.0088*D(DLVNI(-4)) +
7.93e-06
D(DLIP) = 0.2316*( DLCPI(-1) - 17.6787*DLIP(-1) +
1.7175*DLOIL(-1) + 1.1329*DLVNI(-1) + 0.1683) - 2.8766*D(DLCPI(-1)) +
0.8269*D(DLCPI(-2)) + 1.3112*D(DLCPI(-3)) + 0.1091*D(DLCPI(-4)) +
2.1218*D(DLIP(-1)) + 1.4042*D(DLIP(-2)) + 0.8723*D(DLIP(-3)) +
0.3578*D(DLIP(-4)) - 0.1715*D(DLOIL(-1)) - 0.3005*D(DLOIL(-2)) -
0.2972*D(DLOIL(-3)) - 0.3218*D(DLOIL(-4)) + 0.0398*D(DLVNI(-1)) -
0.0635*D(DLVNI(-2)) - 0.0236*D(DLVNI(-3)) + 0.1386*D(DLVNI(-4)) -
0.0009
D(DLOIL) = - 0.0312*( DLCPI(-1) - 17.6787*DLIP(-1) +
1.7175*DLOIL(-1) + 1.1329*DLVNI(-1) + 0.1683) + 1.1189*D(DLCPI(-1)) +
1.4514*D(DLCPI(-2)) + 1.2122*D(DLCPI(-3)) + 0.4452*D(DLCPI(-4)) -
0.4886*D(DLIP(-1)) - 0.3772*D(DLIP(-2)) - 0.1832*D(DLIP(-3)) -
0.0407*D(DLIP(-4)) - 0.5134*D(DLOIL(-1)) - 0.2723*D(DLOIL(-2)) -
0.2535*D(DLOIL(-3)) - 0.1955*D(DLOIL(-4)) + 0.0334*D(DLVNI(-1)) +
0.1419*D(DLVNI(-2)) - 0.0518*D(DLVNI(-3)) - 0.07816*D(DLVNI(-4)) +
0.0001
D(DLVNI) = - 0.0080*( DLCPI(-1) - 17.6787*DLIP(-1) +
1.7175*DLOIL(-1) + 1.1329*DLVNI(-1) + 0.1683) - 2.0021*D(DLCPI(-1)) -
0.7666*D(DLCPI(-2)) + 0.7508*D(DLCPI(-3)) + 0.4738*D(DLCPI(-4)) -
0.1374*D(DLIP(-1)) - 0.1162*D(DLIP(-2)) - 0.0308*D(DLIP(-3)) +
0.03339*D(DLIP(-4)) - 0.0192*D(DLOIL(-1)) + 0.1914*D(DLOIL(-2)) +
0.2539*D(DLOIL(-3)) - 0.0400*D(DLOIL(-4)) - 0.3157*D(DLVNI(-1)) -
0.3173*D(DLVNI(-2)) - 0.3897*D(DLVNI(-3)) - 0.2532*D(DLVNI(-4)) -
0.0034
II.5. Kim nh tnh vng chc ca m hnh
Kim nh tnh dng
t-Statistic
Resid01 -11.38297***
Resid02 -11.85380***
Resid03 -11.53454***
Resid04 -11.4097***
Kt qu kim nh cc phn d sau khi c lng m hnh cho thy tt c cc phn d
dng vi mc ngha 10%. Do , kt qu c lng l ph hp.
Kim nh t tng quan LM
VEC Residual Serial Correlation LM Tests
Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order
Date: 10/31/13 Time: 18:02
Sample: 2001M01 2012M07
Included observations: 134
Lags LM-Stat Prob
1 20.65156 0.1923
2 16.17100 0.4411
3 21.88412 0.1470
4 13.37409 0.6452
Probs from chi-square with 16 df.
Kt qu kim nh sau khi c lng m hnh ti tr bc 4 cho thy khng c t
tng quan vi mc ngha 10%.
Do , kt qu c lng l ph hp.
GII THIU M HNH VECMHi quy gi moGii thch vn hi quy gi mong lin ktM hnh VECMTHC HNH