38
Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. ............................. 8-100 3M Innovative Props. Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp. ................... 8-54 318 Patent Infringement Litig., In re ................... 9-28, 17-11, 17-29 A Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., In re ................................................. 9-52 Abbott Labs. v. Baxter Pharm. Prods., Inc. ....................... 8-68, 10-13 Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ........................................................ 8-70 AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v. Janssen Biotech, Inc. .................................................. 9-74, 17-25 Abele, In re ....................................................................... 7-45, 15-28 Abtox, Inc. v. Exitron Corp. ...................................................... 8-100 Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. ............................ 9-74 Accenture Glob. Servs., GmbH v. Guidewire Software, Inc. ...................................................... 7-31 Acme Resin Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc. ..................................... 16-12 Acromed Corp. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. ................................ 4-9 Adams & Ferrari, Ex parte .................................................. 8-48, 8-49 Adang v. Fischhoff ..................................................................... 17-28 Advance Ground Info. Sys., Inc. v. Life360, Inc. .... 8-39, 9-10, 15-38 Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp. ........................................... 4-3, 4-10, 10-7 Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc. ........................ 8-108 Advanced Video Techs. LLC v. HTC Corp. ................................... 2-9 Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC, In re .................................................. 8-28 Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. ........................... 7-10 T 1 (Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Table of Authorities

(References are to pages.)

CASES

01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. ............................. 8-1003M Innovative Props. Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp. ................... 8-54’318 Patent Infringement Litig., In re ................... 9-28, 17-11, 17-29

A

Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., In re ................................................. 9-52Abbott Labs. v. Baxter Pharm. Prods., Inc. .......................8-68, 10-13Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ........................................................ 8-70AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v.

Janssen Biotech, Inc. ..................................................9-74, 17-25Abele, In re .......................................................................7-45, 15-28Abtox, Inc. v. Exitron Corp. ...................................................... 8-100Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. ............................ 9-74Accenture Glob. Servs., GmbH v.

Guidewire Software, Inc. ...................................................... 7-31Acme Resin Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc. ..................................... 16-12Acromed Corp. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. ................................ 4-9Adams & Ferrari, Ex parte ..................................................8-48, 8-49Adang v. Fischhoff ..................................................................... 17-28Advance Ground Info. Sys., Inc. v. Life360, Inc. .... 8-39, 9-10, 15-38Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v.

Rome Fastener Corp. ........................................... 4-3, 4-10, 10-7Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc. ........................ 8-108Advanced Video Techs. LLC v. HTC Corp. ................................... 2-9Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC, In re .................................................. 8-28Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. ........................... 7-10

T–1(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 2: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. DIRECTV, LLC ........... 7-10, 7-14, 9-45AFG Indus., Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co. ..................................8-31, 8-76Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC ............................................ 9-29, 9-31, 17-32AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac ............................................ 8-30, 8-72, 9-25Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ...................... 8-107Akamatsu, In re ........................................................................... 15-8Aktiebolaget Karlstads Mekaniska Werkstad v.

U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n .................................................... 17-30Alappat, In re ...................................................................7-40, 15-23Alcon Research Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc. ............................................. 8-90Alcon Research Ltd. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ........................................ 9-16Alfred E. Mann Found. for Sci. Research v. Cochlear Corp. ...... 15-34Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l ................... 7-2, 7-4, 7-5, 7-6,

........................................................................ 7-7, 7-8, 7-9, 7-12,

........................................................7-13, 7-15, 7-17, 7-30, 15-18Allen, Ex parte ............................................................................. 7-47Allergan, Inc. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................................................ 16-15Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. ................................... 8-85, 9-10, 17-40Allvoice Computing PLC v. Nuance Commc’ns, Inc. ......9-30, 15-32AllVoice Devs. US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. ................................... 7-3Alonso, In re .............................................................................. 17-22Al-Site Corp. v. VSI Int’l, Inc. ............................................8-39, 8-78Altris, Inc. v. Symantec Corp. ..................................................... 8-52ALZA Corp. v. Andrx Pharm., LLC ............................................. 9-24Amdocs (Isr.) Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc. .................................. 7-14Am. Acad. Sci. Tech. Ctr., In re ................................................. 19-10Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co. ............................... 10-15Am. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc. ............................................ 8-25Am. Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp. .................................. 8-29Amgen, Inc. v.

Chugai Pharm. Co. ........ 9-35, 9-37, 17-21, 17-27, 17-28, 17-55Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. ........................2-21, 9-49Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. ..................8-89, 17-29Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi ................................... 9-15, 9-17, 12-15, 17-22Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of Am. Inc. ...................................... 9-17Anchor Wall Sys. v. Rockwood Retaining Walls ........................... 8-97Ancol Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc. .......................................................... 8-49Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Elecs., Inc. ............................................ 14-7Andrews, Ex parte ..................................................................... 11-14Angstadt, In re ........................................................................... 17-26Antares Pharma v. Medac Pharma Inc. ..............................19-4, 19-7Aoyama, In re ............................................................................ 15-33Apotex Inc. v. UCB, Inc. ........................................................... 10-15Apotex Pty. Ltd. v. Warner-Lambert Co. .................................... 18-17

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–2

Page 3: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Apple Comput., Inc. v. Articulate Sys., Inc. .......................8-23, 8-24Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc. ................................... 7-10, 7-13, 7-14Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ............................................... 11-8Applied Med. Res. Corp. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. .......................... 9-31Arbeit, In re ................................................................................. 8-43ArcelorMittal Fr. v. AK Steel Corp. .............................................. 19-8Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. ....9-12, 9-21, 9-72, 17-22, 17-24Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. ................................. 7-49Aristocrat Techs. Austl. Pty Ltd. v. Int’l Game Tech. .......9-69, 15-33Arrhythmia Research Tech., Inc. v.

Corazonix Corp. .............................7-39, 7-38, 7-41, 7-42, 7-44,................................................15-19, 15-22, 15-24, 15-25, 15-28

Arzberger, In re ............................................................................ 13-2Asgrow Seedco v. Winterboer ....................................................... 13-2Ashow Ltd. v. Morgan Constr. Co. .............................................. 6-17Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. .....7-48, 7-50AstraZeneca AB v. Hanmi USA, Inc. ...............................16-5, 17-20AstraZeneca LP v. Apotex, Inc. ................................... 7-3, 7-49, 8-94AT&T Corp. v. Excel Commc’ns, Inc. ........ 7-35, 7-46, 15-19, 15-29ATD Corp. v. Lydall, Inc. ............................................................ 8-89Athena Automation Ltd. v.

Husky Injection Molding Sys., Ltd. ...................................... 4-11Atl. Research Mktg. Sys. v. Troy Indus. ....................................... 9-16Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. ........9-27, 9-32Atmel Corp. v. Info. Storage Devices, Inc. ....... 9-10, 9-69, 9-70, 9-81Auto. Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. BMW of N. Am., Inc. ....... 8-81, 9-26, 9-68Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v.

Crystal Imp. Corp. ............................................ 4-11, 10-6, 10-7

B

B. Braun Med., Inc. v. Abbott Labs. ............................................. 8-40Baldwin Graphic Sys., Inc. v. Siebert, Inc. ................................. 8-100Bankowski, In re .............................................................8-126, 8-127Baran v. Med. Device Techs., Inc. ............................................... 8-42Barker, In re ........................................................................9-11, 9-17Barr, In re .................................................................................. 16-17Bartlett, In re ............................................................................. 11-21Bascom v. AT&T ......................................................................... 7-14BASF Corp. v. Johnson Matthey Inc. ...................................8-8, 8-81Bass Pro Trademarks LLC v. Cabela’s, Inc. ................................. 8-26Bayer AG v. Schein Pharm., Inc. ................................................. 9-31Beauregard, In re ......................................... 7-30, 7-32, 15-15, 18-16

Table of Authorities

T–3(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 4: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Grp., LP ......8-53, 8-54Beech Aircraft Corp. v. EDO Corp. ............................................... 4-3Beineke, In re .............................................................................. 13-2Bell, In re ................................................................................... 17-27Bell Commc’ns Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Commc’ns Corp. ....... 8-24Bergstrom, In re ......................................................................... 17-15Bergy, In re ................................................................................ 17-14Berkheimer v. HP Inc. ....................................... 7-11, 7-15, 7-31, 8-8Berkman, In re .....................................................................6-3, 9-11Bickell, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-124Bicon Inc. v. Straumann Co. ....................................................... 8-26Bilkington, In re .......................................................................... 8-70Billottet, Ex parte ......................................................................... 14-9Billups-Rothenburg v. Associated Reg’l &

Univ. Pathologists, Inc. ....................................................... 17-23Bilski, In re .........................................................................7-15, 7-49Bilski v. Kappos ............................. 7-9, 7-15, 7-16, 7-17, 7-22, 7-25,

............................................... 7-26, 7-28, 7-29, 7-31, 7-33, 7-34,

........................................................7-36, 7-49, 7-53, 15-4, 15-18Biomedino, LLC v. Waters Techs. Corp. .............................9-10, 9-67Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc. ................................... 8-46BJ Servs. Co. v. Halliburton Energy Servs. Inc. ........................... 8-96Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. ................................8-89, 9-67Blaser, In re .................................................................................. 16-5Blue Calypso, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. ............................................ 9-10Blumcraft of Pittsburgh v. Ladd ................................................. 11-15Bd. of Educ. v. Am. Bioscience, Inc. .......................................4-5, 4-6Bd. of Educ. v. AMA Biosciences, Inc. ......................................... 4-11Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v.

Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong ................................................ 11-7Boehringer Ingleheim Vetmedica, Inc. v.

Schering-Plough Corp. .......................................................... 8-24Bogese, In re .............................................................................. 8-102Boldt, In re ................................................................................ 11-22Boller, In re .......................................................................8-81, 16-17Bolton, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-125Bond, In re .................................................................................. 8-34Bondiou, Ex parte ........................................................................ 9-80Borkowski, In re ....................................................... 9-27, 9-39, 16-9Bos. Sci. Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson ....................................... 17-23Bourne v. Jones ............................................................................ 13-5Bowles, In re ................................................................................ 8-34Bowman v. Monsanto .................................................................. 17-5Bradford Co. v. Conteyor N. Am., Inc. ........................................ 8-88

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–4

Page 5: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc. ................................... 8-101Brana, In re .............................................................. 9-6, 17-9, 17-13Brasseler, U.S.A. I, LP v. Stryker Sales Corp. ............................... 10-9BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Litig.

(Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics Corp.),In re ...................................................................................... 7-48

Brenner v. Manson .................................................................... 16-11Brian, Ex parte ........................................................................... 16-17Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Labs., Inc. .............8-23, 8-24Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v.

Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc. ............................. 10-10, 19-4, 19-10Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices ............................... 9-40Brouwer, In re ............................................................................ 17-18Brown, In re .............................................................................. 14-14Brown v. 3M ....................................................... 8-106, 8-110, 8-121Brown & Saffer, In re ................................................................. 16-16Bruno Indep. Living Aids, Inc. v.

Acorn Mobility Servs. Ltd. .................................................. 10-10Buchner, In re .....................................................................9-19, 16-7Bundy, In re ............................................................................... 17-30Burke, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-64Burke, Inc., In re ....................................................................... 8-115Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................... 4-4, 4-5, 4-9buySAFE, Inc. v. Google, Inc. ...............................................7-8, 7-24

C

Caldwell, In re ........................................................................... 16-18Callicrate v. Wadsworth Mfg., Inc. .............................................. 9-21Canter, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-125Capon v. Eshar .......................................................................... 17-24Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v.

St. Jude Med., Inc. .................................... 8-31, 8-85, 9-67, 9-69Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. Renishaw PLC ....................................8-74, 9-6Carletti, In re ............................................................................... 11-4Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. .........9-13, 17-22Carter v. ALK Holdings, Inc. ......................................................... 4-5Catalina Mktg. Int’l v. Coolsavings.com ..................................... 8-25Caterpillar, Inc. v. Sturman Indus., Inc. .................................4-5, 4-6Cattech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc. ............................................... 8-100Centillion Data Sys., LLC v.

Qwest Commc’ns Int’l, Inc. ............................................... 8-107Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs. ....... 9-12, 17-22, 17-23

Table of Authorities

T–5(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 6: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Cent. Soya Co. v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. ..................................... 4-7Cephalon, Inc. v. Watson Pharm., Inc. ........................................ 9-23Certain Ltd.-Charge Cell Culture Microcarriers, In re .................. 9-9Certain Pers. Computs., In re ............................................8-45, 8-46Certain Slide Fastener Stringers, In re ................................8-28, 8-29Chatfield, In re .................................................................7-36, 15-19Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. Knogo Corp. .......................................... 9-34Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Indus. Corp. ........... 9-29, 9-34, 9-40, 16-12Chi. Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. ........................... 8-115Chilowsky, In re .....................................................................9-5, 9-6Chiron Corp. v.

Genentech, Inc. ................... 9-23, 9-24, 9-25, 9-27, 9-28, 17-29Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v.

Cardinal Indus., Inc. ....................................................8-78, 9-70Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp. ......... 9-19, 9-31, 16-11CIAS, Inc. v. All. Gaming Corp. ................................................. 8-28Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Biogen IDEC ......................... 7-49ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc. .............................. 8-99Clement, In re ............................................................................. 19-4Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics LLC ........... 7-49CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. .................................7-6, 7-30Cohesive Techs., Inc. v. Waters Corp. .................................8-96, 8-97Cold Spring Harbor Lab. v. Ropes & Gray LLP ........................... 9-76Cole, Ex parte .............................................................................. 11-6Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. ...................................................... 8-40CollegeNet, Inc. v. Applyyourself, Inc. ...................................... 8-100Comiskey, In re ........................................................................... 7-17Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc. ....................................... 8-107Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Envtl., Inc. .......................................... 8-30Conopco, Inc. v. May Dep’t Stores .............................................. 8-96Consol. Aluminum Corp. v.

Foseco Int’l Ltd. ...................................... 9-34, 9-38, 10-2, 16-13Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v.

Wells Fargo Bank .................................................................... 7-8Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Comput. Corp. ................................ 8-100Cook, In re .................................................................................. 14-5Cook Biotech, Inc. v. Acell, Inc. .................................................. 9-82Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Elecs., Inc. ..................... 7-12Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Elec. U.S.A. ......................... 8-24Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. Sprint Commc’ns Co. ............................ 8-85Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Servs. ................................. 7-10Credle v. Bond ............................................................................... 4-9Crish, In re ............................................................. 8-28, 8-32, 17-14Cross v. Lizuka .......................................................................... 17-10

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–6

Page 7: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v.Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. ..........................9-16, 9-92

Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v.Tritech Microelectronics Int’l, Inc. .................. 8-31, 8-76, 8-100

Cumberland Pharm. Inc. v. Mylan Institutional LLC ................... 4-6Curtis, In re ................................................................................. 9-15CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc. .....................7-16, 15-15

D

Daiichi Sankyo Co. v. Matrix Labs., Ltd. .................................... 16-2Dale Elecs., Inc. v. R.C.L. Elecs., Inc. .................................9-35, 9-37Dana Corp. v. IPC Ltd. P ’ship ..................................................... 9-36Daniels, In re ............................................................................... 11-7Dart Indus., Inc. v. Banner .......................................................... 9-82Datamize LLC v. Plumtree Software, Inc. ........................8-11, 8-119Davis, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-27Davis & Tuukkanen, Ex parte ................................................... 17-38Dayco Prods., Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc. ............................ 10-9DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P. ............................7-13, 7-23Dealertrack, Inc. v. Huber ...................................... 7-30, 9-87, 15-33Deere & Co. v. Bush Hog, LLC ................................................... 8-97Deering Precision Instruments v.

Vector Distribution Sys. ...............................................8-97, 9-63Default Proof Credit Card Sys., Inc. v.

Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. ...............8-80, 9-10, 9-69, 9-70, 9-81DeGeorge v. Bernier .................................................. 8-24, 9-30, 9-33Dense, In re ............................................................................... 8-125Deutsch, In re ............................................. 7-36, 7-38, 15-19, 15-21Dey, L.P. v. Sunovion Pharm., Inc. ............................................ 10-10DH Tech., Inc. v. Synergystex Int’l, Inc. ...................................... 2-15Diamond v. Chakrabarty ........................7-3, 7-47, 8-19, 13-2, 17-14Diamond v. Diehr ...............................................................7-34, 7-35Digitech Image Techs., LLC v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc. ........7-7, 7-24Dillon, In re ...................................................................16-19, 17-40Dinsmore, In re ........................................................................... 19-4Dippin’ Dots, Inc. v. Mosey ................................................8-29, 10-9DiStefano, In re ................................................................................ 7-3Dolbear v. Am. Bell Tel. Co. ...................................................... 16-10Donaldson, Ex parte .................................................................... 11-3Donaldson Co., In re ........................................................8-43, 15-31Donoghue, Ex parte ..................................................................... 11-3Donohue, In re .................................................................14-9, 14-10

Table of Authorities

T–7(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 8: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Door-Master Corp. v. Yorktowne, Inc. ....................................... 11-18Dossel, In re .......................................................................8-80, 9-67Dow Chem. Co. v. Nova Chems. Corp. ........................................ 8-7Durden, In re ........................................................ 8-71, 17-17, 17-40Duva, In re ................................................................................ 8-127Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. Nat’l Graphics, Inc. ..................... 12-15

E

Echerd, In re ................................................................................ 8-81Edwards Lifesciences AG v. Cook Biotech Inc. ............................ 18-5Edwards Lifesciences AG v. CoreValve, Inc. ................................ 9-28Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. .................................11-4, 11-8Ehrreich, In re ........................................................................... 17-39Eickmeyer, In re ......................................................................... 17-20Ekchian v. Home Depot, Inc. .................................................... 10-14Elec. Molding Corp. v. Mupac Corp. ........................................... 11-6Elec. Power Grp. v. Alstom S.A. ...........................................7-9, 7-13Eli Lilly v. Teva .......................................................................... 8-107Eli Lilly & Co. v. Aradigm Corp. ................................................... 4-5Eli Lilly & Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc. ................................................ 9-30Elliot, Ex parte ............................................................................... 6-8EMI Grp. N. Am., Inc. v.

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. ....................... 8-11, 8-105, 8-128Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v.

Alpine Elecs. of Am., Inc. ..................................................... 9-47Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ........................ 8-113Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. ...........................................7-7, 7-12Engel Indus., Inc. v. Lockformer Co. ........................................... 9-32Enovsys LLC v. Nextel Commc’ns, Inc. ...................................... 2-11Envirco Corp. v. Clestra Cleanroom, Inc. ................................... 8-40Envirotech Corp. v. Al George, Inc. ............................................... 9-6Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Applera .................................................... 8-101Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc. ............................................ 9-22Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe, Inc. ...........................17-25, 17-31EON Corp. IP Holding LLC v.

AT&T Mobility LLC ........................................ 9-69, 9-70, 15-33Epcon Gas Sys., Inc. v.

Bauer Compressors, Inc. .................................... 8-24, 8-41, 8-63ePlus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc. .......................................... 15-32Ergo Licensing, LLC v. CareFusion 303, Inc. ...................9-70, 15-33Erie Tech. Prods. v. Die Craft Metal Prods. ................................... 4-8Esquire, Inc. v. Ringer .................................................................. 14-2Ethicon, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp. .............................. 4-8, 4-9, 4-11

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–8

Page 9: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Evans Med. Ltd. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ..................................... 17-54Exmark Mfg. Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Prods. Grp. ............. 8-8Ex parte Adams & Ferrari ...................................................8-48, 8-49Ex parte Allen .............................................................................. 7-47Ex parte Andrews ...................................................................... 11-14Ex parte Bickell .......................................................................... 8-124Ex parte Billottet .......................................................................... 14-9Ex parte Bolton .......................................................................... 8-125Ex parte Bondiou ......................................................................... 9-80Ex parte Brian ............................................................................ 16-17Ex parte Burke ............................................................................. 8-64Ex parte Canter ......................................................................... 8-125Ex parte Cole ............................................................................... 11-6Ex parte Davis ............................................................................. 8-27Ex parte Davis & Tuukkanen .................................................... 17-38Ex parte Donaldson ..................................................................... 11-3Ex parte Donoghue ...................................................................... 11-3Ex parte Elliot ................................................................................ 6-8Ex parte Forman ........................................................................ 17-26Ex parte Foster ............................................................................. 13-5Ex parte Girt ................................................................................ 8-41Ex parte Gross ........................................................................... 8-111Ex parte Guinzburg ................................................................... 11-16Ex parte Gutta ............................................................................. 7-29Ex parte Halligan ......................................................................... 7-29Ex parte Hansen .......................................................................... 8-58Ex parte Harvey ......................................................................... 17-20Ex parte Head .............................................................................. 8-65Ex parte Hibberd ......................................................................... 7-47Ex parte Jackson ........................................................................ 17-36Ex parte Kluis & Kluis ................................................................. 13-5Ex parte Klumb ............................................................................ 8-38Ex parte Kubin ........................................................................... 17-22Ex parte Lakkala .......................................................................... 8-41Ex parte Langemyr ....................................................................... 7-29Ex parte Levinn ........................................................................... 11-4Ex parte Lewin ............................................................................. 8-10Ex parte Lohman ....................................................................... 11-18Ex parte Lundgren ..................................................................... 15-13Ex parte MacAdams .................................................................... 8-71Ex parte Maizel .......................................................................... 17-27Ex parte Markush .......................... 8-9, 8-29, 8-56, 8-63, 8-64, 8-65,

........................................... 8-66, 8-67, 8-68, 8-90, 8-105, 8-110,

........................................ 8-121, 8-126, 9-26, 9-27, 16-15, 17-38Ex parte McAward ......................................................................... 8-8

Table of Authorities

T–9(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 10: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Ex parte Mewherter ..................................................................... 7-30Ex parte Miyazaki .......................................................................... 8-8Ex parte Moelands ..................................................................... 8-113Ex parte Moore ......................................................... 13-3, 13-4, 13-5Ex parte Nawathe ........................................................................ 7-29Ex parte Nolden ........................................................................... 8-49Ex parte Oetiker ........................................................................ 8-117Ex parte Palmer ........................................................................... 8-65Ex parte Pantzer & Feier .............................................................. 8-69Ex parte Price .............................................................................. 8-65Ex parte Reid ............................................................................. 8-120Ex parte Root ............................................................................. 11-10Ex parte Sanford ........................................................................ 11-15Ex parte Slob ............................................................................. 8-123Ex parte Smith ............................................................................ 8-41Ex parte Squires ........................................................................... 8-10Ex parte Stephens ...................................................................... 8-125Ex parte Strijland ................................................................11-3, 15-4Ex parte Tayama .................................................................11-3, 15-4Ex parte Velander ........................................................................... 6-6Ex parte Wolfer ............................................................................ 11-6Ex parte Xu .................................................................................. 7-30Exxon Chem. Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp. ...................9-45, 16-16

F

Fabrica, Inc. v. El Dorado Corp. .................................................. 14-2FairWarning IP, LLC v. Iatric Sys., Inc. ............ 7-10, 7-13, 7-14, 7-17Falana v. Kent State Univ. ............................................................. 4-7Falkner v. Engliss .................................................... 9-11, 9-23, 17-25Ferguson, In re ........................................................... 7-2, 8-17, 8-22Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku

Kogyo Kabushiki Co. ........... 2-26, 5-4, 8-104, 9-74, 12-15, 18-8Fiddes v. Baird ........................................................................... 17-28Fiers v. Revel .....................................9-12, 16-6, 17-21, 17-26, 17-28Fina Oil & Chem. Co. v. Ewen ..................................................... 4-6Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Grp., Inc. ........................................... 15-32Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Sys., Inc. .............................................. 7-12Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp. .............................8-86, 15-9Fisher, In re ..................................................... 9-6, 9-24, 9-25, 17-13Flexiteek Ams., Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc. ........................................... 9-74Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Mfg. Co. .................................. 2-24Fonar Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co. .................................................... 15-31

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–10

Page 11: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Forest Labs., Inc. v. Ivax Pharm., Inc. ......................................... 19-3Forman, Ex parte ....................................................................... 17-26Foster, Ex parte ............................................................................ 13-5Fouche, In re ......................................................................9-26, 9-27Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instruments Co. ......................................... 6-5Frank’s Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc. v.

PMR Techs., Ltd. .................................................................. 4-11Freeman, In re ....................................................................7-34, 7-35Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int’l, Inc. ...................................... 8-67Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc. ......................................... 9-22Fromson v. Anitec Printing Plates, Inc. ....................................... 8-89Fuetterer, In re ..................................................................8-81, 8-122Fujikawa v. Wattanasin .............................................................. 17-13Fuller, In re ................................................................................ 8-122Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. ............................9-69, 15-32

G

GAF Corp. v. AMCHEM Prods. .................................................... 4-9Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc. ............................................ 8-98Gardner, In re ............................................ 9-20, 16-11, 17-20, 17-35Garnero, In re .....................................................................8-30, 8-69Gaubert, In re .............................................................................. 8-65Gelnovatch, In re ..............................................................7-45, 15-28Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S ....................................... 17-28Genentech, Inc. v. Wellcome Found. ................................9-18, 17-36Gen. Elec. Co. v. Nintendo Co. ................................................... 8-23Gen. Elec. Co. v. Nitro Tungsten Lamp Co. .............................. 8-116Gen. Elec. Co. v. Wilkins ............................................................ 4-10Gen. Electro Music Corp. v. Samick Music Corp. ...................... 2-39Gen. Motors Corp. v. Toyota Motors Co. .................................... 4-10Genetic Techs. v. Merial .............................................................. 7-50Geneva Pharm., Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC .......................... 8-103Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp. ................................8-11, 9-16Geo. M. Martin Co. v. All. Mach. Sys. Int’l LLC ........................ 8-63Georgetown Rail Equip. Co. v. Holland L.P. ................................ 8-24Ga.-Pac. Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp. ....................................... 8-115GFIInc. v. Franklin Corp ........................................................... 10-10Ghiron, In re ............................................................................. 14-10Giannelli, In re ............................................................................ 8-44Gilead Scis., Inc. v. Lee .............................................................. 10-12Girt, Ex parte ............................................................................... 8-41Glavas, In re .............................................................................. 11-22

Table of Authorities

T–11(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 12: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Impax Labs., Inc. .................................. 9-74Go Med. Indus. Pty., Ltd. v. Inmed Corp. ................ 6-10, 9-29, 9-50Goeddel v. Sugano ..................................................................... 17-24Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple, Inc. .................................... 10-16Golden Hour Data Sys., Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. ....................... 10-11Goodman, In re ......................................................................... 17-27Gorham Mfg. Co. v. White .......................................................... 11-7Gosteli, In re ......................................................................16-4, 16-5Gottschalk v. Benson ................................................................... 7-34Gould v. Mossinghoff .................................................................. 14-5Graco, Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co. .............................................9-33, 9-34Grams, In re .......................................................................7-34, 7-35Grasselli, In re ............................................................................. 8-29Greenberg v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery ............................................. 8-82Gross, Ex parte .......................................................................... 8-111Guinzburg, Ex parte .................................................................. 11-16Gulack, In re ........................................................................7-3, 7-35Gustafson, In re .......................................................................... 8-49Gustausson v. Valenti .................................................................. 8-25Gutta, Ex parte ............................................................................ 7-29

H

Haemonetics Corp. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. ........................... 8-23Halleck, In re ............................................................................... 8-81Halligan, Ex parte ........................................................................ 7-29Hallmann, In re ........................................................................... 8-81Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Sunbeam Prods., Inc. ................ 10-7Hamington Mfg. Co. v. White ....................................................... 6-7Hansen, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-58Harari v. Hollmer ........................................................................ 9-47Harari v. Lee ................................................................................ 9-82Harnisch, In re ....................................................... 8-64, 8-65, 8-120Harold Schoenhause v. Genesco, Inc. .......................................... 8-88Harvey, Ex parte ........................................................................ 17-20Hayes Microcomputer Prods., Inc. Patent Litig.,

In re .........................................................................15-31, 15-39Head, Ex parte ............................................................................. 8-65Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc. ..................... 8-118Hibberd, Ex parte ........................................................................ 7-47High Point Design LLC v. Buyers Direct, Inc. ....................11-5, 11-8Hill-ROM Co. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. &

KCI Therapeutic Servs., Inc. ................................................. 9-92

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–12

Page 13: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Hitzeman v. Rutter ........................................................................ 4-6H.K. Porter Co. v. Gates Rubber Co. ............................................. 6-5Hoffer v. Microsoft Corp. ............................................................ 8-46Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Burroughs Wellcome Co. .............. 8-118Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Promega Corp. .......................9-27, 9-73Hogan, In re ................................................................................ 14-6Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co. ............................... 8-122Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................... 8-12Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Sys. Corp. ................ 9-63Hoop v. Hoop .............................................................................. 4-12Howarth, In re ............................................................................. 9-19Hozumi, In re ................................................................................ 9-9Hruby, In re ................................................................................. 11-3Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States .......................................... 9-32Hutchison, In re ........................................................................ 8-123Hyatt, In re .....................................................................8-121, 8-122Hyatt v. Dudas ............................................................................ 9-16Hybritech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs. .................................................. 8-118Hybritech, Inc. v.

Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. ....................... 8-115, 17-30, 17-39Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H.G. Salzmann, Inc. ......................... 11-4

I

Ibormeith IP v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ................................ 15-33ICU Med., Inc. v. Alaris Med. Sys., Inc. ..................................... 9-93IGT v. Bally Gaming Int’l, Inc. ................................................. 8-101Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp. .................................................... 1-7Impression Prods. v. Lexmark ..................................................... 8-99IMS Tech., Inc. v. Haas Automation, Inc. ................................... 8-41In re ’318 Patent Infringement Litig. .................... 9-28, 17-11, 17-29In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. .................................................. 9-52In re Abele ........................................................................7-45, 15-28In re Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC ................................................... 8-28In re Akamatsu ............................................................................ 15-8In re Alappat ....................................................................7-40, 15-23In re Alonso ............................................................................... 17-22In re Am. Acad. Sci. Tech. Ctr. .................................................. 19-10In re Angstadt ............................................................................ 17-26In re Aoyama ............................................................................. 15-33In re Arbeit .................................................................................. 8-43In re Arzberger ............................................................................. 13-2In re Bankowski ..............................................................8-126, 8-127

Table of Authorities

T–13(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 14: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

In re Barker ........................................................................9-11, 9-17In re Barr ................................................................................... 16-17In re Bartlett .............................................................................. 11-21In re Beauregard .......................................... 7-30, 7-32, 15-15, 18-16In re Beineke ............................................................................... 13-2In re Bell .................................................................................... 17-27In re Bergstrom .......................................................................... 17-15In re Bergy ................................................................................. 17-14In re Berkman ......................................................................6-3, 9-11In re Bilkington ........................................................................... 8-70In re Bilski ..........................................................................7-15, 7-49In re Blaser .................................................................................. 16-5In re Bogese ............................................................................... 8-102In re Boldt ................................................................................. 11-22In re Boller ........................................................................8-81, 16-17In re Bond ................................................................................... 8-34In re Borkowski ........................................................ 9-27, 9-39, 16-9In re Bowles ................................................................................. 8-34In re Brana ............................................................... 9-6, 17-9, 17-13In re BRCA1- and BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer

Test Patent Litig. (Univ. of Utah Research Found. v.Ambry Genetics Corp.) ......................................................... 7-48

In re Brouwer ............................................................................. 17-18In re Brown ............................................................................... 14-14In re Brown & Saffer ................................................................. 16-16In re Buchner ............................................................ 9-19, 9-20, 16-7In re Bundy ................................................................................ 17-30In re Burke, Inc. ........................................................................ 8-115In re Caldwell ............................................................................ 16-18In re Carletti ................................................................................ 11-4In re Certain Ltd.-Charge Cell Culture Microcarriers ................... 9-9In re Certain Pers. Computs. .............................................8-45, 8-46In re Certain Slide Fastener Stringers .................................8-28, 8-29In re Chatfield ..................................................................7-36, 15-19In re Chilowsky ......................................................................9-5, 9-6In re Clement .............................................................................. 19-4In re Comiskey ............................................................................ 7-17In re Cook ................................................................................... 14-5In re Crish .............................................................. 8-28, 8-32, 17-14In re Curtis .................................................................................. 9-15In re Daniels ................................................................................ 11-7In re Dense ................................................................................ 8-125In re Deutsch .............................................. 7-36, 7-38, 15-19, 15-21In re Dillon ....................................................................16-19, 17-40

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–14

Page 15: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

In re Dinsmore ............................................................................ 19-4In re DiStefano .............................................................................. 7-3In re Donaldson Co. .........................................................8-43, 15-31In re Donohue ..................................................................14-9, 14-10In re Dossel ........................................................................8-80, 9-67In re Durden ......................................................... 8-71, 17-17, 17-40In re Duva ................................................................................. 8-127In re Echerd ................................................................................. 8-81In re Ehrreich ............................................................................ 17-39In re Eickmeyer ......................................................................... 17-20In re Ferguson ............................................................ 7-2, 8-17, 8-22In re Fisher ...................................................... 9-6, 9-24, 9-25, 17-13In re Fouche .......................................................................9-26, 9-27In re Freeman .....................................................................7-34, 7-35In re Fuetterer ...................................................................8-81, 8-122In re Fuller ................................................................................. 8-122In re Gardner ............................................. 9-20, 16-11, 17-20, 17-35In re Garnero ......................................................................8-30, 8-69In re Gaubert ............................................................................... 8-65In re Gelnovatch ...............................................................7-45, 15-28In re Ghiron .............................................................................. 14-10In re Giannelli ............................................................................. 8-44In re Glavas ............................................................................... 11-22In re Goodman .......................................................................... 17-27In re Gosteli .......................................................................16-4, 16-5In re Grams ........................................................................7-34, 7-35In re Grasselli .............................................................................. 8-29In re Gulack .........................................................................7-3, 7-35In re Gustafson ........................................................................... 8-49In re Halleck ................................................................................ 8-81In re Hallmann ............................................................................ 8-81In re Harnisch ........................................................ 8-64, 8-65, 8-120In re Hayes Microcomputer Prods., Inc.

Patent Litig. .............................................................15-31, 15-39In re Hogan ................................................................................. 14-6In re Howarth .............................................................................. 9-19In re Hozumi ................................................................................. 9-9In re Hruby .................................................................................. 11-3In re Hutchison ......................................................................... 8-123In re Hyatt ......................................................................8-121, 8-122In re Iwahashi .......................... 7-39, 7-40, 8-43, 15-8, 15-22, 15-24In re Johnson .......................................................... 7-44, 15-27, 16-7In re Johnson & Farnham ......................................................... 17-35In re Jolles ................................................................................. 17-10

Table of Authorities

T–15(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 16: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

In re Joyce A. Cortright ........................................................9-5, 17-9In re Kanter ................................................................................. 8-71In re Katz Interactive Call Processing

Patent Litig. ..................................................... 8-11, 9-70, 15-33In re Kirk ..................................................................................... 17-9In re Klein ..........................................................................8-13, 9-55In re Knowlton .................................................................14-4, 14-10In re Koller .................................................................................. 9-21In re Kratz ................................................................................. 16-14In re Kubin ................................................................................ 17-16In re Land & Rogers .................................................................. 8-123In re Langdon ............................................................................ 8-126In re LeGrice ............................................................................... 13-5In re Lowry ................................. 7-3, 7-35, 7-40, 7-42, 15-23, 15-25In re Ludtke ........................................................................8-81, 8-82In re Lukach ................................................................................ 16-5In re Lundberg ............................................................................. 8-43In re Man Mach. Interface Techs. LLC ....................................... 8-81In re Marzocchi ........................................................................... 16-9In re Mason ................................................................................. 8-45In re Metcalfe .............................................................................. 9-21In re Meyers .................................................................................. 6-4In re Miller .................................................................................... 7-3In re Moore ................................................................................. 9-18In re Morris ................................................................................... 1-2In re Morsa .................................................................................. 9-21In re Nalbandian ....................................................................... 11-22In re Naquin .....................................................................9-19, 15-30In re Neugebauer ......................................................................... 8-71In re Ngai ................................................................. 7-3, 8-94, 17-15In re Nomiya ............................................................................... 9-52In re Nuijten ............................................................................. 15-14In re Ochiai ............................................................................... 17-18In re O’Farrell ............................................................................ 17-16In re Owens ......................................................................11-7, 11-20In re Packard ................................................................................. 8-8In re Pardo ................................................... 7-36, 7-37, 15-19, 15-20In re Paulsen ................................................................................ 8-24In re Peters ................................................................................ 14-13In re Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten ........................................................ 14-6In re Phillips .....................................................................7-38, 15-21In re Pleuddemann ............................................. 17-17, 17-18, 17-40In re Queen’s Univ. at Kingston .................................................... 4-1In re Rasmussen ........................................................................ 14-13In re Reinhardt .......................................................................... 17-31

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–16

Page 17: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

In re Roberts .............................................................................. 17-35In re Robins ............................................................................... 17-20In re Roslin Inst. (Edinburgh) ...................................................... 7-54In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig. .................................... 19-3In re Rubinfield ..............................................................11-14, 11-15In re Ruff ..................................................................................... 8-67In re Ruschig ............................................................................... 16-6In re Sarett ................................................................................ 16-17In re Scarbrough ........................................................................ 14-10In re Schechter .................................................................8-64, 8-126In re Schilling .............................................................................. 11-4In re Schoenwald & Barfknecht ................................................. 16-14In re Serenkin .............................................................................. 19-4In re Seversky .............................................................................. 9-82In re Sherwood .................................7-43, 9-19, 15-26, 15-31, 15-36In re Silver .................................................................................... 4-2In re Smith ...............................................7-8, 7-13, 9-10, 9-11, 16-5In re Staats .................................................................................. 19-8In re Stephens ............................................................................. 9-34In re Steppan ............................................................................... 8-69In re Strahilevitz ...............................................................9-39, 17-26In re Swartz ................................................................................... 9-5In re Swinehart ............................................ 8-51, 8-81, 8-121, 8-123In re Tam ....................................................................................... 9-6In re Tanaka ................................................................................ 19-3In re Tanczyn ............................................................................... 8-10In re Taner ........................................................................7-42, 15-25In re Thorpe .............................................................................. 17-39In re TLI Commn’cs LLC Patent Litig. ....................................... 7-10In re Toma ................................................... 7-36, 7-37, 15-19, 15-20In re Vaeck ............................................................ 8-128, 9-25, 17-26In re Veldhuis ...................................................................7-42, 15-25In re Venezia ................................................................................ 8-49In re Vickers ................................................................................ 14-5In re Wakefield ...................................................................16-7, 16-9In re Wallach ....................................................................9-12, 17-23In re Walter .................................................................................. 7-34In re Wands ................................................. 9-22, 9-23, 17-26, 17-36In re Warmerdam .............................................................7-40, 15-23In re Webb ................................................................................... 11-6In re Wertheim .................................................................16-7, 17-20In re Wilder ........................................................................9-9, 14-13In re Winkhaus ............................................................................ 9-20In re Wolfensperger .................................................................6-3, 6-5In re Wolfrum ............................................................................ 8-120

Table of Authorities

T–17(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 18: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

In re Wright ......................................................................9-11, 17-27In re Yamazaki ............................................................................ 19-4In re Youman ............................................................................... 19-8Ineos USA LLC v. Berry Plastics Corp. ....................................... 8-14Inline Plastics Corp. v. EasyPak, LLC. ......................................... 8-89Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc. .....................8-13, 9-55Insituform Techs., Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc. ........................ 8-100Intamin Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs. Corp. ....................................... 8-88Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA) ............... 7-9Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Fin. Corp. .........7-9, 7-10Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indem. Co. ..................2-10, 7-10Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp. .................7-10, 7-13,

......................................................................................7-14, 15-3Int’l Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp. ........................... 11-8Int’l Standard Elec. Corp. v. Ooms .............................................. 9-19Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc. ......................7-8, 7-9Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. .............................................. 8-7Intervet Inc. v. Merial Ltd. ........................................................ 17-23Intirtool, Ltd. v. Texar Corp. ........................................................ 8-24Inventio AG v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator Ams. Corp. .................... 8-40Inventor Holdings, LLC v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. ................... 7-11Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Mfg. LP ........................................... 8-28Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Labs, Inc. ....................................... 9-25IPcom GmbH v. HTC Corp. .................................... 8-39, 8-40, 8-43IPIXL Holdings, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. .........................7-2, 8-10,

.......................................................................... 8-17, 8-91, 8-129Iwahashi, In re ......................... 7-39, 7-40, 8-43, 15-8, 15-22, 15-24

J

Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co. .................................................. 6-3Jackson, Ex parte ....................................................................... 17-36J.E.M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’l, Inc. ...........7-47, 13-2Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. v. Dillon Co. ......................................8-97, 9-92Johns-Manville Corp. v. Guardian Indus. Corp. ........................ 8-126Johnson, In re ......................................................... 7-44, 15-27, 16-7Johnson & Farnham, In re ........................................................ 17-35Johnson & Johnson Assocs., Inc. v. R.E. Serv. Co. .................... 8-102Jolles, In re ................................................................................ 17-10Jones Knitting Corp. v. Morgan ......................................8-115, 8-119Joyce A. Cortright, In re .......................................................9-5, 17-9J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd. ................................................ 10-2Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc. ........................................... 9-5

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–18

Page 19: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

K

Kanter, In re ................................................................................ 8-71Katz Interactive Call Processing

Patent Litig., In re ............................................ 8-11, 9-70, 15-33KCJ Corp. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. .......................................... 8-100Kennecott Corp. v. Kyocera Int’l, Inc. ........................................ 17-20Keurig, Inc. v. Sturm Foods, Inc. ........................................8-85, 8-99Key Pharm. v. Hercon Labs. Corp. ............................................ 17-38Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc. .............................. 14-2Kim Bros. v. L.A. Hagler .............................................................. 13-2Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Distrib. Co. ............... 4-8King Pharm., Inc. v. Eon Labs, Inc. ............................................. 8-12Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister .......................... 10-2Kintner v. Atl. Commc’n Co. .................................................... 8-115Kirk, In re .................................................................................... 17-9Klein, In re .........................................................................8-13, 9-55Kluis & Kluis, Ex parte ................................................................ 13-5Klumb, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-38Knowlton, In re ................................................................14-4, 14-10Koehring Co. v. E.D. Etnyre & Co. ............................................... 4-9Kolen Corp. v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc. .......................... 8-96Koller, In re .................................................................................. 9-21Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Int’l Trading Co. ........................................... 9-70Kratz, In re ................................................................................ 16-14Kropa v. Robie .............................................................................. 8-23KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. .......................... 8-14, 8-15, 8-16, 9-53,

....................................................16-2, 16-3, 17-16, 17-18, 17-19Kubin, Ex parte .......................................................................... 17-22Kubin, In re ............................................................................... 17-16Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc. ..............8-106, 8-110

L

L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co. .................................... 11-5Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co. .......................8-116, 8-119Lakkala, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-41Land & Rogers, In re ................................................................. 8-123Landes Mfg. Co. v. Chromodern Chair Co. ................................ 11-4Langdon, In re ........................................................................... 8-126Langemyr, Ex parte ...................................................................... 7-29Larson Mfg. Co. v. Aluminart Prods. Ltd. ................................... 10-9Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc. .................... 8-98

Table of Authorities

T–19(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 20: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp. ....................................2-24, 8-36LeGrice, In re .............................................................................. 13-5Leo Pharm. Prods., Ltd. v. Rea .................................................... 9-53Levinn, Ex parte .......................................................................... 11-4Leviton Mfg. Co. v. Universal Sec. Instruments, Inc. ............... 10-10Lewin, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-10Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States ............................... 8-117Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc. ..................................9-24, 9-25Lifescan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Techs., LLC .............................. 8-99Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. ...................... 8-107Litton Sys., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp. ........................................... 11-21Lizardtech, Inc. v. Earth Res. Mapping, Inc. .......................9-17, 9-26Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Sys./Loral, Inc. ......................... 8-45Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal Ltd. ..................................................... 8-24Lohman, Ex parte ...................................................................... 11-18Loral Corp. v. B.F. Goodrich Co. ................................................. 9-38Lowry, In re ................................ 7-3, 7-35, 7-40, 7-42, 15-23, 15-25Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. ...................................8-28, 9-92Ludtke, In re .......................................................................8-81, 8-82Lukach, In re ............................................................................... 16-5Lundberg, In re ............................................................................ 8-43Lundgren, Ex parte .................................................................... 15-13

M

MacAdams, Ex parte ................................................................... 8-71Maclaren v. B-I-W Grp., Inc. ..................................................6-3, 6-5MagSil Corp. v. Hitachi Glob. Storage Techs., Inc. ................... 8-128Maizel, Ex parte ......................................................................... 17-27Man Mach. Interface Techs. LLC, In re ...................................... 8-81Mankes v. Vivid Seats Ltd. ........................................................ 8-107Markush, Ex parte ......................... 8-9, 8-29, 8-56, 8-63, 8-64, 8-65,

........................................... 8-66, 8-67, 8-68, 8-90, 8-105, 8-110,

........................................ 8-121, 8-126, 9-26, 9-27, 16-15, 17-38Marley Mouldings, Ltd. v. Mikron Indus., Inc. ........................... 8-12Mars, Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co. ...............................................8-8, 16-18Marston v. J.C. Penney Co. ...................................... 8-24, 8-25, 8-75Martin v. Mayer ......................................................................... 17-21Marzocchi, In re .......................................................................... 16-9Masco Corp. v. United States ...................................................... 8-41Mas-Hamilton Grp., Inc. v. LaGard, Inc. .................................... 8-40Mason, In re ................................................................................ 8-45Mass. Inst. of Tech. v. Abacus Software ...................................... 8-37

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–20

Page 21: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

MasterMine Software, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. .................8-44, 8-129Mathis v. Hydro Air Indus. ....................................................... 8-115Mattor v. Coolegem ....................................................................... 4-8Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc. ......................................... 8-71, 8-90, 8-102Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc. .................. 7-48McAward, Ex parte ........................................................................ 8-8McGrady v. Aspenglas Corp. ..................................................... 11-13McKesson Info. Sols., Inc. v. Bridge Med., Inc. ......................... 10-11McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am. Inc. .................7-12, 7-15MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc. ............ 8-93Medgraph, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. ............................................. 8-110Media Rights Techs., Inc. v. Capital One Fin. Corp. ................... 8-39Med. Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp. v.

Elekta AB ...................................................................9-67, 15-32Medichem v. Rolabo .................................................................... 8-28Medrad, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Grp. LP .................................... 19-3Medtronic CoreValve, LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. ........... 9-47Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. .......8-41, 9-70Medtronic, Inc. v. Guidant Corp. ................................................ 19-5Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. ............................4-11, 8-7Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. ................ 4-3Mentor H/S, Inc. v. Med. Device All., Inc. .................................. 9-31Merck & Co. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. ................................... 10-2Merck & Co. v. Olin Mathieson Chem. Corp. .......................... 16-14Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ...................................... 8-96Merck KGaA v. Integra Life Scis. I, Ltd. ...................................... 17-4Metabolyte Labs., Inc. v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings ................ 8-26Metcalfe, In re ............................................................................. 9-21Mettler-Toledo, Inc. v. B-Tek Scales, LLC .................................... 9-68Mewherter, Ex parte .................................................................... 7-30Meyers, In re ................................................................................. 6-4Microprocessor Enhancement Corp. v.

Tex. Instruments Inc. ............................... 7-2, 8-10, 8-17, 8-113Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tek Sys. .....................................9-58, 17-21Miller, In re ................................................................................... 7-3Miller v. Brass Co. ....................................................................... 8-90MIT v. A.B. Fortia ......................................................................... 9-9Miyazaki, Ex parte ......................................................................... 8-8Moelands, Ex parte .................................................................... 8-113Moleculon Res. Corp. v. CBS, Inc. .............................................. 8-28Monsanto Co. v. Bayer Bioscience N.B. ...................................... 10-8Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. .............................8-56, 17-29Monsanto Tech. LLC v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. .............. 8-97Moore, Ex parte ........................................................ 13-3, 13-4, 13-5

Table of Authorities

T–21(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 22: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Moore, In re ................................................................................ 9-18Moore v. Stewart ...............................................................11-5, 11-17Morris, In re .................................................................................. 1-2Morsa, In re ................................................................................. 9-21Mortg. Grader, Inc. v. First Choice Loan Servs. Inc. ............7-9, 7-13MPHJ Tech. Invs., LLC v. Ricoh Ams. Corp. ............................ 12-13MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP ............................... 11-8Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Indus., Inc. ..................................... 4-5Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v.

Berry Plastics Corp. ........................................... 8-29, 8-57, 8-66MuniAuction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp. ......................................... 15-6

N

Nalbandian, In re ...................................................................... 11-22Naquin, In re ....................................................................9-19, 15-30Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A., Inc. ...................................4-6, 4-9Nat’l Recovery Tech., Inc. v. Magnetic Separation Sys., Inc. ....... 9-24Nationwide Chem. Corp. v. Wright ............................................. 14-6Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. .............. 8-7, 8-117, 8-118Nawathe, Ex parte ....................................................................... 7-29Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc. .......................................... 15-33Netword, LLC v. Centraal Corp. ................................................. 8-45Neugebauer, In re ........................................................................ 8-71New Railhead Mfg., L.L.C. v. Vermeer Mfg. Co. .....12-3, 12-10, 12-13Ngai, In re ................................................................ 7-3, 8-94, 17-15Nichia Corp. v. Everlight Ams., Inc. ........................................... 9-64Nicholson v. Bailey ...................................................................... 13-5Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. .................................................. 9-50Noah Sys., Inc. v. Intuit, Inc. .................................................... 15-33Noelle v. Lederman ...........................................................9-15, 17-23Nolden, Ex parte .......................................................................... 8-49Nomiya, In re .............................................................................. 9-52Nordock, Inc. v. Sys. Inc. ............................................................ 11-4Norian Corp. v. Stryker Corp. ................................ 8-29, 8-30, 8-100N. Am. Container, Inc. v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc. .................... 8-97N. Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corp. ...................... 9-20, 9-38, 15-30N. Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ..............................9-31, 9-40Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Intel Corp. ...........................9-27, 9-73Norton Co. v. Bendix Corp. ....................................................... 8-119Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Eon Labs Mfg. Inc. ........................... 16-16Novo Industri A/S v. Travenol Lab., Inc. ..................................... 9-35Novo Nordisk Pharm. Inc. v. Bio-Tech. Gen. Corp. .................... 9-27

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–22

Page 23: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Novozymes A/S v. DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS ................ 9-12NTP, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd. ....................................... 8-108Nuijten, In re ............................................................................ 15-14

O

Ochiai, In re .............................................................................. 17-18Oetiker, Ex parte ........................................................................ 8-117O’Farrell, In re ........................................................................... 17-16Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps S., LLC ...........................8-99, 10-10O.I. Corp. v. Tekmar Co. ............................................................. 8-38OIP Techs., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. ........................................... 7-9Openwave Sys., Inc. v. Apple, Inc. .............................................. 9-52O’Reilly v. Morse ..................................................................4-9, 7-47Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc. ........................ 8-115Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc. v. Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. ........... 8-96Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc. v. Mylan Labs., Inc. ..............8-89, 8-110OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. v. Am. Induction Techs., Inc. ................. 8-14Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v.

Travel Caddy, Inc. ......................................................2-15, 10-10Owens, In re .....................................................................11-7, 11-20

P

Pac. Coast Marine Windshields Ltd. v. Malibu Boats, LLC ....... 11-16Pacing Techs., LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. ..................................... 9-89Packard, In re ................................................................................ 8-8Paice LLC v. Ford Motor Co. ....................................................... 9-82Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc. ......................................... 8-96Palmer, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-65Pan Am. Plant Co. v. Matsui ....................................................... 13-4Pannu v. Iolab Corp. ...................................................................... 4-8Pantzer & Feier, Ex parte ............................................................. 8-69Pardo, In re .................................................. 7-36, 7-37, 15-19, 15-20Parke, Davis & Co. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ................................ 17-39Parker v. Bergy ........................................................................... 17-14Parker v. Flook ..................................................................7-45, 15-28Paulsen, In re ............................................................................... 8-24PerkinElmer, Inc. v. Intema Ltd. .................................................. 7-48Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp. ............................. 8-24Perspective Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. .....4-12, 10-7Peters, In re ............................................................................... 14-13

Table of Authorities

T–23(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 24: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten, In re ....................................................... 14-6Pfizer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Labs., Ltd. ................................................ 8-57Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ..................... 8-102, 9-30, 9-32Philco Corp. v. Admiral Corp. ........................................11-16, 11-17Phillips, In re ....................................................................7-38, 15-21Phillips v. AWH Corp. ................................................................. 8-40Pitney Bowes v. Hewlett-Packard Co. .......................................... 8-23Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS, LLC .........................................7-8, 7-24Playtex Prods., Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co. .............................. 8-97Pleuddemann, In re ............................................ 17-17, 17-18, 17-40Poly-Am., LP v. GSE Line & Tech., Inc. .............................8-24, 8-26Porter v. Farmer ’s Supply Serv., Inc. ............................................ 8-75Power-One, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc. ....................................... 8-81Presidio Components v. Am. Tech. Ceramics Corp. ............8-8, 19-5Pressure Prods. Med. Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Ltd. ............... 9-68Price, Ex parte ............................................................................. 8-65Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. ....................... 16-2Prolitec, Inc. v. ScentAir Techs., Inc. ........................................... 9-74Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp. ........................ 8-29, 9-26, 17-37PSC Comput. Prods., Inc. v. Foxconn Int’l, Inc. ....................... 8-102Purdue Pharma LP v. Endo Pharm., Inc. ..................................... 9-73Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma, LLC ................................... 8-70

Q

Quanta Comput., Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc. ..................................... 8-99Quantum Corp. v. Rodine, PLC .................................................. 8-97Queen’s Univ. at Kingston, In re ................................................... 4-1

R

Rajchman v. Herbert & Simpson ................................................. 8-46Randomex, Inc. v. Scopus Corp. .................... 9-30, 9-31, 9-39, 16-12Rapid Litig. Mgmt. v. CellzDirect ................................................ 7-49Rasmussen, In re ....................................................................... 14-13Rasmusson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. .......................9-24, 17-13Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc. ............................................................ 11-4Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. .............................................. 7-11Reed v. Edwards ........................................................................... 8-42Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co. .......................... 17-48Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Oncor Inc. ................................. 8-100Reid, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-120Reifin v. Microsoft Corp. ....................................................8-11, 9-14

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–24

Page 25: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Reinhardt, In re ......................................................................... 17-31Rembrandt Data Techs., LP v. AOL, LLC .................................... 8-11Research Corp. Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. .......... 7-7, 7-23, 9-17Research Found. of State Univ. of N.Y. v.

Mylan Pharm., Inc. .............................................................. 8-90ResQNet.com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc. .............................................. 10-14Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv. ......................... 7-8, 7-11, 7-15Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. ......................... 9-92Ring Plus, Inc. v. Cingular Wireless Corp. .........................9-52, 9-54Rivera v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ...................................................... 9-63Riverwood Int’l Corp. v. R.A. Jones & Co. ................................ 10-13Robert Bosch, LLC v. Snap-On Inc. ....................................8-40, 9-10Robert W. Brown & Co. v. De Bell .............................................. 11-5Roberts, In re ............................................................................. 17-35Robins, In re .............................................................................. 17-20Robotic Vision Sys. v. View Eng’g, Inc. .............................9-31, 15-31Rodime PLC v. Seagate Tech., Inc. .............................................. 8-40Root, Ex parte ............................................................................ 11-10Roslin Inst. (Edinburgh), In re ..................................................... 7-54Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., In re ................................... 19-3Rowe v. Dror ............................................................. 8-23, 8-24, 8-62Rubinfield, In re .............................................................11-14, 11-15Ruff, In re .................................................................................... 8-67Ruschig, In re .............................................................................. 16-6

S

S3, Inc. v. nVIDIA Corp. ............................................................. 9-69Safe Flight Instruments Corp. v.

Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. ..................................7-45, 15-28Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson ..................................................... 9-68Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc. ...............................8-40, 8-90SanDisk Corp. v. Kingston Tech. Co. ...............................8-100, 9-83Sanford, Ex parte ....................................................................... 11-15Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc. ................................................ 9-89Sarett, In re ............................................................................... 16-17Saunders Grp., Inc. v. Comfortrac, Inc. ....................................... 8-88Scanner Techs. Corp. v.

ICOS Vision Sys. Corp. N.V. ........................... 2-39, 8-28, 8-101Scarbrough, In re ....................................................................... 14-10Schechter, In re .................................................................8-64, 8-126Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc. ............................8-14, 17-15Schilling, In re ............................................................................. 11-4Schoenwald & Barfknecht, In re ................................................ 16-14

Table of Authorities

T–25(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 26: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Schumer v. Lab. Comput. Sys., Inc. .......................................... 8-106Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v.

Genentech, Inc. ............................................. 9-36, 16-16, 17-39ScriptPro LLC v. Innovation Assocs., Inc. ................................... 9-10Sealant Sys. Int’l, Inc. v. TEK Glob., S.R.L. ................................ 9-74Seattle Box Co. v. Indus. Crating & Packing, Inc. ............8-118, 19-5Secured Mail Sols. v. Universal Wilde, Inc. ........................7-11, 7-31Semiconductor Energy Lab. Co. v. Samsung Elec. Co. .............. 10-10Serenkin, In re ............................................................................. 19-4Serrano v. Telular Corp. ............................................................... 8-38Seversky, In re .............................................................................. 9-82Sewall v. Walters ...................................................... 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-8Sherwood, In re ................................7-43, 9-19, 15-26, 15-31, 15-36Shields v. Halliburton Co. ............................................................. 4-8Shire Dev., LLC v. Watson Pharm., Inc. .............................8-66, 8-67Shum v. Intel Corp. ....................................................................... 4-6SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple Inc. ......................................... 8-89Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Techs., Inc. ...........................8-82, 15-8Silver, In re .................................................................................... 4-2Sinorgchem Co., Shandong v. ITC .............................................. 9-63SiRF Tech., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ....................................... 7-24Sitrick v. Dreamworks, LLC ........................................................ 9-24SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc. .......................................8-11, 9-82Skinner Bros. Belting Co. v. Oil Well Improvements Co. ............ 8-48Slob, Ex parte ............................................................................ 8-123SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Labs. ............................. 7-12Smart Sys. Innovations, LLC v. Chi. Transit Auth. ..........7-11, 15-23Smith, Ex parte ........................................................................... 8-41Smith, In re ..............................................7-8, 7-13, 9-10, 9-11, 16-5SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. ............................... 8-14Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. ......................................4-15, 8-11Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc. ........................................ 15-6Spalding & Evenflo Cos. v. Acushnet Co. ................................... 9-30Spectra-Physics, Inc. v. Coherent, Inc. ..................... 9-33, 9-39, 14-5Sport Dimension, Inc. v. Coleman Co. .................... 11-4, 11-5, 11-9Squires, Ex parte .......................................................................... 8-10Staats, In re ................................................................................. 19-8Staehlin v. Secher ........................................................................ 16-7Standard Oil Co. v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. ................... 8-118Star Sci. Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. .................................. 9-32State St. Bank & Tr. Co. v.

Signature Fin. Grp., Inc. .......................... 7-34, 7-35, 7-40, 7-45,........................................................... 15-19, 15-23, 15-28, 15-29

Stephens, Ex parte ..................................................................... 8-125Stephens, In re ............................................................................ 9-34

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–26

Page 27: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Steppan, In re .............................................................................. 8-69Stern v. Columbia Univ. ................................................................ 4-8Storer v. Clark ............................................................................. 9-24Strahilevitz, In re ..............................................................9-39, 17-26Streck v. Research & Diagnostic Sys., Inc. .................................. 9-25Strijland, Ex parte ...............................................................11-3, 15-4Studiengesellschaft Kohle v. Eastman Kodak Co. ........................ 9-33Sunrace Roots Enter. Co. v. Sram Corp. ...................................... 8-89Superguide Corp. v. DirecTV Enters., Inc. .................................. 8-68Suprema, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n .......................................... 8-85Swartz, In re .................................................................................. 9-5Swinehart, In re ........................................... 8-51, 8-81, 8-121, 8-123Symantec Corp. v. Comput. Assocs. Int’l, Inc. ........................... 8-24Symbol Techs., Inc. v. Lemelson Med., Educ. &

Research Found. .................................................................. 8-102Synthes USA, LLC v. Spinal Kinetics, Inc. .................................. 9-16

T

Tabuchi & Ave v. Nubell ........................................................... 17-31Taltech Ltd. v. Esquel Enters. Ltd. ....................................10-5, 10-14Tam, In re ...................................................................................... 9-6Tanaka, In re ............................................................................... 19-3Tanczyn, In re .............................................................................. 8-10Taner, In re .......................................................................7-42, 15-25Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Res., Inc. ..... 8-100Tavory v. NTP Inc. ........................................................................ 4-5Tayama, Ex parte ................................................................11-3, 15-4Tex. Dig. Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc. ........................................... 9-63Tex. Instruments, Inc. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............8-46, 9-31Thales Visionix Inc. v. United States .......................................... 7-12Therasense, Inc. v.

Becton, Dickinson & Co. ................................. 2-15, 8-89, 9-88,.......................................................................... 10-3, 10-6, 10-11

Thorpe, In re ............................................................................. 17-39Thyssen Plastik Anger KG v. Induplas, Inc. .......................9-34, 9-37Tinnus Enters., LLC v. Telebrands Corp. ...................................... 8-7Titanium Metals Corp. of Am. v. Banner ........................8-124, 9-45TiVo, Inc. v. EchoStar Commc’ns Corp. ...........................8-100, 9-86TLI Commn’cs LLC Patent Litig., In re ...................................... 7-10Toma, In re .................................................. 7-36, 7-37, 15-19, 15-20Topliff v. Topliff ............................................................................. 1-2Toro Co. v. Deere & Co. .............................................................. 8-40Toro Co. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc. ...................................... 8-102

Table of Authorities

T–27(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 28: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. ...................................... 9-89Trans World Mfg. Corp. v. Al Nyan & Sons ................................ 14-2Transco Prods., Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. .............. 12-10Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v.

Maersk Contractors USA, Inc. ............................................. 9-28Transperfect Glob. Inc. v. Matal .................................................. 8-34TransWeb LLC v. 3M Innovative Props. Co. ......................10-3, 10-8Travel Sentry, Inc. v. Tropp ........................................................ 8-107Trebro Mfg., Inc. v. Firefly Equip., LLC ....................................... 8-88Trimed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp. ....................................................... 8-40Tronzo v. Biomet ................................................................9-17, 9-72Tyco Healthcare Grp. v. Mut. Pharm. Co. ................................... 8-99Typhoon Touch Techs., Inc. v. Dell, Inc. ................................... 15-33Two-Way Media Ltd. v.

Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC .................................7-11, 7-17

U

Ulf Bamberg v. Dalvey ................................................................. 9-17UltimatePointer, LLC v. Nintendo Co. ........................................ 8-10Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC .......................... 7-7, 7-8, 7-25, 7-30Ultra-Precision Mfg., Ltd. v. Ford Motor Co. ................................ 4-8Unidynamics Corp. v. Automatic Prods. Int’l, Ltd. ............8-39, 8-40Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. ......................................... 8-107Union Carbide Corp. v. Borg-Warner Corp. ................................. 9-37Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Atl. Richfield Co. ................................. 9-10Union Pac. Res. Co. v. Chesapeake Energy Corp. ....................... 9-20United States v. Telectronics, Inc. ............................ 9-22, 9-23, 9-25U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Nat’l Gypsum Co. ...................................... 9-33U.S. Indus. v. Norton Co. ........................................................... 10-6Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly & Co. .......................................17-21, 17-48Univ. of Pittsburgh v. Hedrick ................................................4-4, 4-6Univ. of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co. ..........................9-12, 17-24Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics Corp. ........... 7-48Utter v. Hiraga ........................................................ 9-16, 9-17, 17-26

V

Vaeck, In re ........................................................... 8-128, 9-25, 17-26Valmont Indus., Inc. v. Reinke Mfg. Co. ..................................... 8-78Vanderbilt Univ. v. ICOS Corp. ..............................................4-5, 4-8Vapor Point LLC v. Moorhead ................................................2-9, 4-8Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar ......................................................... 9-12

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–28

Page 29: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Vehicular Tech. Corp. v. Titan Wheel Int’l, Inc. .................8-29, 9-71Velander, Ex parte .......................................................................... 6-6Veldhuis, In re ..................................................................7-42, 15-25Venezia, In re ............................................................................... 8-49Versata Dev. Grp., Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc. ....................................... 7-9Vickers, In re ............................................................................... 14-5Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. ................................................... 9-53Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corp. ........................................ 7-12Vizio, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................................................ 8-26Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Elections Sols., Inc. ...................... 8-41

W

Wahl Instruments, Inc. v. Acvious, Inc. ................. 9-36, 9-37, 16-13Wakefield, In re ..................................................................16-7, 16-9Walker Process Equip., Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp. ........ 10-3Wallach, In re ...................................................................9-12, 17-23Walter, In re ................................................................................. 7-34Wands, In re ................................................ 9-22, 9-23, 17-26, 17-36Warmerdam, In re ............................................................7-40, 15-23Water Techs. Corp. v. Calco Ltd. ................................................. 8-30Webb, In re .................................................................................. 11-6Welker Bearing Co. v. PHD, Inc. ................................................. 8-37Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chem. Co. .................... 9-39, 9-68, 16-13Wells Mfg. Corp. v. Littlefuse, Inc. .............................................. 8-61Wertheim, In re ................................................................16-7, 17-20White Consol. Indus., Inc. v.

Vega Servo-Control, Inc. ..............9-23, 9-40, 9-79, 15-31, 15-36Wilder, In re ........................................................................9-9, 14-13Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC ......................................8-39, 9-69Winkhaus, In re ........................................................................... 9-20WMS Gaming Inc. v. Int’l Game Tech. ....................................... 15-8Wolfensperger, In re ................................................................6-3, 6-5Wolfer, Ex parte ........................................................................... 11-6Wolfrum, In re ........................................................................... 8-120World Class Tech. Corp. v. Ormco Corp. .................................... 9-53Wright, In re .....................................................................9-11, 17-27Wyeth v. Abbott Labs. .......................................................9-24, 16-18

X

X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................. 9-86Xu, Ex parte ................................................................................. 7-30

Table of Authorities

T–29(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 30: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

Y

Yamazaki, In re ........................................................................... 19-4YBM Magnex, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................................ 8-102Yeda Research & Dev. Co. v. Abbott GmbH .............................. 17-24Yoder Bros. v. Cal.-Fla. Plant Corp. .......................... 13-2, 13-4, 13-5York Prods., Inc. v. Cent. Tractor Farm & Family Ctr. ................ 8-40Youman, In re .............................................................................. 19-8

Z

Z4 Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. ............................................. 8-101Zenon Envtl., Inc. v. U.S. Filter Corp. ........................................ 9-82Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co. ................................................. 8-30Zoltek Corp. v. United States .............................................8-11, 19-7

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–30

Page 31: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

UNITED STATES CODE

TITLE 7

§ 2321 et seq. ...........7-47, 13-2§ 2321–82 .......................... 17-3§ 2402 ............................... 17-3

TITLE 17

§ 101 ........................14-2, 14-3§ 117 ................................. 14-2§ 901 et seq. ...................... 14-2

TITLE 18

§ 1001 ................................. 2-7

TITLE 19

§ 1337(a) ........................... 8-84

TITLE 20

§ 1001(a) ........................... 2-13§ 1003(21) ......................... 2-13

TITLE 35

§ 32 ................................... 10-3§ 101 .......... 1-3, 7-2, 7-3, 7-15,

..... 7-17, 7-18, 7-33, 7-34,

..... 7-35, 7-45, 8-17, 8-70,

............ 8-74, 8-91, 8-111,

....... 8-127, 9-5, 9-7, 9-24,

............ 9-41, 9-60, 15-13,

.......... 15-28, 16-10, 17-8,

.......... 17-9, 17-10, 17-14,

.....................18-16, 18-22§ 102 ........ 1-3, 7-17, 8-6, 8-12,

.............. 8-14, 8-17, 8-74,

.......... 8-128, 10-9, 11-21,

.............. 16-9, 17-8, 17-9,

.....................17-14, 17-19§ 102(b) ....1-7, 5-5, 9-11, 12-12§ 102(b)(2)(C) ...........2-38, 8-13§ 102(c) .............................. 8-14§ 102(d) ....................1-6, 11-21§ 102(e) .....................12-7, 12-9§ 102(f) .............................. 8-17§ 102(g) ........... 1-2, 8-128, 9-88§ 103 .......... 1-3, 5-2, 7-17, 8-6,

..... 8-12, 8-14, 8-67, 8-74,

..... 9-9, 9-51, 11-21, 17-8,

.......... 17-9, 17-15, 17-16,

......... 17-17, 17-18, 17-19§ 103(b) ............................. 19-7§ 103(c) .....................2-22, 2-38§ 111 ................................... 2-4§ 111(a) ........... 2-5, 2-15, 2-33,

..... 2-39, 12-2, 12-4, 12-5,

....12-6, 12-7, 12-9, 12-10,

.......... 12-11, 12-14, 12-17§ 111(b) ...................12-2, 12-5,

............. 12-6, 12-8, 12-14§ 111(b)(2) ......................... 12-9§ 111(b)(6) ......................... 12-5§ 111(b)(8) ..............12-9, 12-10§ 111(c) ..........................2EX-52§ 112 ............ 1-3, 1-6, 1-8, 2-4,

....... 2-23, 5-4, 7-32, 7-39,

........... 7-41, 8-6, 8-7, 8-8,

..... 8-11, 8-12, 8-20, 8-31,

..... 8-37, 8-38, 8-39, 8-40,

..... 8-41, 8-42, 8-43, 8-51,

..... 8-58, 8-59, 8-67, 8-74,

..... 8-77, 8-78, 8-79, 8-80,

............ 8-82, 8-91, 8-102,

........ 8-103, 8-105, 8-111,

........ 8-114, 8-121, 8-124,

........ 8-126, 8-127, 8-129,

........... 9-4, 9-5, 9-9, 9-17,

..... 9-19, 9-24, 9-28, 9-34,

..... 9-40, 9-41, 9-48, 9-50,

Table of Authorities

T–31(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 32: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

..... 9-57, 9-58, 9-61, 9-69,

..... 9-70, 9-72, 9-80, 9-81,

.......... 11-11, 12-8, 12-10,

........ 12-11, 12-13, 12-15,

............ 12-16, 14-5, 14-9,

........ 14-12, 14-13, 14-14,

........ 15-22, 15-24, 15-30,

........ 15-31, 15-32, 15-36,

............ 15-38, 16-4, 16-7,

........ 16-10, 16-11, 16-12,

.......... 16-13, 17-8, 17-10,

........ 17-19, 17-26, 17-26,

....................17-31, 17-32,

.....................17-59, 18-21§ 112(b) ............................. 7-29§ 112(f) ............................ 8-130§ 112, ¶ 1 .... 9-50, 12-8, 12-10,

........... 14-9, 15-30, 17-19§ 112, ¶ 2 ...... 8-39, 8-66, 8-80,

............ 9-63, 9-69, 11-11,

....................15-32, 15-38,

.....................17-35, 17-39§ 112, ¶ 4 .......................... 8-57§ 112, ¶ 6 ........ 8-9, 8-31, 8-37,

.............. 8-38, 8-39, 8-40,

..... 8-41, 8-42, 8-78, 8-80,

.... 9-10, 9-69, 9-76, 15-32§ 113 ................. 2-17, 6-3, 6-4,

............... 6-5, 14-9, 15-39§ 115 ................................... 4-3§ 116 ...........................4-3, 4-8,

............... 4-10, 12-6, 13-5§ 117 .............................2EX-55§ 119 .......................2-27, 2-28,

............. 11-21, 12-4, 19-9§ 119(a) ..................9-29, 12-12§ 119(b) .........................2EX-53§ 119(e) .......12-3, 12-5, 2EX-52§ 119(e)(1) ...... 2-16, 9-29, 12-6§ 119(e)(3) ......................... 12-2§ 120 .....................9-29, 10-16,

.................... 12-4, 2EX-52§ 121 ........... 2-21, 8-18, 8-103,

........ 8-108, 8-110, 8-120,

......................9-49, 16-14,

.................. 17-36, 2EX-52§ 122 ................. 12-14, 2EX-57§ 122(b) .........................2EX-52§ 122(b)(1) ....................... 12-14§ 122(b)(2)(B)(i) .................. 2-43§ 122(b)(2)(B)(iii) ................ 2-43§ 122(c) ................................ 1-7§ 132 ................................. 9-11§ 154 ................................. 12-2§ 154(d) .....................3-8, 8-72,

.....................12-14, 18-23§ 161 ............. 2-33, 13-1, 13-2,

............... 13-3, 13-4, 13-8§ 161–64 ...................7-47, 17-3§ 163 ................................. 13-2§ 171 ............ 11-2, 11-4, 11-15§ 172 ............................... 11-21§ 181 ....................18-11, 18-12§ 184 ....................18-11, 18-12§ 185 ............................... 18-11§ 202(c)(4) ......................... 2-12§ 251 ........................19-2, 19-7§ 251(a) ............................. 19-4§ 252 ................................. 19-5§ 253 ................................. 19-3§ 254 ................................. 19-3§ 255 ................................. 19-2§ 256 ................................. 4-10§ 261 .................. 2-8, 2-9, 2-11§ 271 ......................8-86, 17-40§ 271(a) ........................... 15-16§ 271(e)(1) ..................4-3, 17-4§ 271(f) .............................. 8-85§ 271(g) ......... 8-84, 8-85, 17-61§ 282 ......................9-29, 17-30§ 284 ................................. 11-4§ 285 ................................. 10-2§ 287 ................................. 8-84§ 287(c) ............................ 8-101§ 301–07 ............................ 19-2§ 365 ................................. 2-27§ 365(c) ..........................2EX-52

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–32

Page 33: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

§ 371 .......................2-16, 2-33,............ 3-2, 3-3, 3-9, 3-10

§ 371(b) ............................. 2-16§ 371(c)(1) ......................... 12-7

§ 371(c)(2) ......................... 12-7§ 371(c)(4) ......................... 12-7§ 371(f) .............................. 2-16§ 386(c) ..........................2EX-52

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

TITLE 35§ 1.51(b) ............................ 2-32

TITLE 37

§ 1.1(e) ................................. 1-9§ 1.4(d) ................ 2-45, 2EX-56§ 1.52(e) ................15-41, 17-34§ 1.7(a)(2)(iii) ..................... 9-48§ 1.9(a)(2) .......................... 12-2§ 1.10(a) ............................ 2-44§ 1.10(b) ............................ 2-44§ 1.14 ..............2EX-54, 2EX-57§ 1.14(a) ............................ 9-48§ 1.14(c) .........................2EX-56§ 1.14(h) ........................2EX-54§ 1.14(h)(1) ....................2EX-54§ 1.14(h)(2) ....................2EX-54§ 1.52(e) ................15-41, 17-34§ 1.52(e)(5) .............9-43, 17-34§ 1.16 ................................ 2-32§ 1.16(s) ............................. 2-40§ 1.16(t) ............................... 3-2§ 1.17 .............................. 11-23§ 1.17(b) .......................... 10-12§ 1.17(h) ...................2-36, 6-25§ 1.17(i) ............................. 2-18§ 1.25 ................................ 2-42§ 1.27 ................................ 2-12§ 1.27(a)(2)(ii) .................... 2-12§ 1.27(a)(3)(ii)(A) ............... 2-13§ 1.27(a)(4)(i) ..................... 2-12§ 1.27(a)(5) ........................ 2-12§ 1.29 ................................ 2-13

§ 1.29(i) ............................. 2-14§ 1.29(j) ............................. 2-14§ 1.31 .................................. 2-7§ 1.32 ............................2EX-52§ 1.32(a) .............................. 1-3§ 1.33(a) ........................2EX-51§ 1.33(b) ........................2EX-56§ 1.34 ...........................2-7, 2-8§ 1.41(b) .............................. 2-6§ 1.43 ............................2EX-55§ 1.45 ............................2EX-55§ 1.45(c) ............................. 12-6§ 1.46 ............................2EX-55§ 1.46(b) ............................ 2-16§ 1.48(d) ............................ 12-6§ 1.48(e) ............................. 12-6§ 1.51 .........................2-4, 2-36§ 1.51(b) ............................ 2-32§ 1.51(c) ............................. 12-8§ 1.51(c)(1) ........................ 12-8§ 1.51(c)(1)(viii) ................. 12-8§ 1.52 .......................2-19, 2-40§ 1.52(a) ............................ 2-20§ 1.52(b)(2) ........................ 2-20§ 1.52(b)(6) ...............2-20, 9-88§ 1.52(c) ............ 2-7, 2-20, 4-16§ 1.52(d) ............................ 2-40§ 1.52(d)(1) ........................ 2-18§ 1.52(e) ................15-41, 17-34§ 1.52(e)(3)(i) ..................... 9-51§ 1.52(e)(3)(ii) .................... 9-88§ 1.52(e)(3)-(6) ..........2-22, 9-43§ 1.52(e)(5) .............9-43, 17-34§ 1.52(f)(1) ......................... 2-22

Table of Authorities

T–33(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 34: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

§ 1.53 ................. 1-9, 2-3, 12-9§ 1.53(b) ........................2EX-52§ 1.53(b)(2)(ii) .................... 12-5§ 1.53(c) .......... 2-3, 2-17, 12-10§ 1.53(c)(1) ........................ 12-8§ 1.53(c)(4) ........................ 12-9§ 1.53(d) .............................. 2-4§ 1.53(f)(3) ..................2-5, 2-32§ 1.53(f)(3)(i) ...................... 2-32§ 1.55 ......................2-15, 2-28,

...........9-48, 9-80, 2EX-53§ 1.55(a)(2) ........................ 2-29§ 1.55(d) ............................ 2-29§ 1.55(g)(1) ....................2EX-53§ 1.55(i)(1) .....................2EX-53§ 1.55(i)(2) .....................2EX-53§ 1.56 ............ 4-16, 10-1, 10-4,

............. 10-5, 10-8, 10-11§ 1.56(a) ............................ 2-26§ 1.56(a)(1) ........................ 10-8§ 1.56(b) ............................ 2-27§ 1.56(c) ........................... 10-12§ 1.56(c)(3) ........................ 10-5§ 1.57(a) .............. 9-80, 2EX-52§ 1.57(c) ............................. 9-80§ 1.58 ................................ 9-88§ 1.58(a) ............................ 9-88§ 1.58(b) ............................ 2-20§ 1.63 ............. 2-28, 2-40, 19-8§ 1.63(b) ............................ 2-40§ 1.63(c) ............................... 2-6§ 1.64 .................................. 2-5§ 1.68 ...........................2-6, 2-7§ 1.69 .................................. 2-6§ 1.69(b) .............................. 2-6§ 1.71 ................................ 2-18§ 1.71–1.75 .......................... 1-6§ 1.71(d) .......................... 15-42§ 1.71(e) ..................9-87, 15-42§ 1.71(f) ............................. 2-20§ 1.71(g)(1) ........................ 2-22§ 1.72(a) ............................ 9-44§ 1.72(b) ......... 2-25, 2-40, 9-90§ 1.73 .......................2-23, 9-56§ 1.74 ................................ 2-23

§ 1.75(a) ............................ 2-24§ 1.75(b) ............................ 8-56§ 1.75(b)(2) ........................ 8-56§ 1.75(c) ....................8-56, 8-61§ 1.75(d) .......................... 8-113§ 1.75(d)(1) ........................ 2-25§ 1.75(e) ............................. 8-61§ 1.75(f) ....................2-25, 8-55§ 1.75(g) ............................. 2-25§ 1.75(h) ............................ 2-24§ 1.76 .............2EX-52, 2EX-53,

...............2EX-54, 2EX-55,

................2EX-56, 2EX-57§ 1.77 ................................ 9-43§ 1.77(a) ...................2-18, 9-51§ 1.77(b) .................9-43, 15-41§ 1.77(b)(5) ...................... 17-34§ 1.78 ......................2-15, 9-48,

........................9-80, 12-3,

................2EX-52, 2EX-53§ 1.78(a) ............................ 2-21§ 1.78(a)(1) ...............2-21, 9-49§ 1.78(a)(2) ..... 9-46, 9-48, 9-49§ 1.78(a)(3) ...............2-21, 9-49§ 1.78(a)(4) ........................ 9-49§ 1.78(a)(5)(iii) ................... 9-48§ 1.78(a)(5)(iv) .................. 2-21,

.......................9-47, 12-10§ 1.78(b) ............................ 12-3§ 1.78(b)(2) ........................ 9-49§ 1.78(d)(3) ........................ 9-50§ 1.81 .................................. 6-4§ 1.81(b) .................6-14, 15-40§ 1.81(c) ............................... 6-4§ 1.83(a) ....................2-18, 6-6,

............. 8-114, 9-75, 14-9§ 1.83(b) .............................. 6-7§ 1.83(c) ............................. 2-18§ 1.84 ............ 2-17, 2-40, 6-15,

............. 6-16, 6-25, 15-41§ 1.84(a) ............................ 6-16§ 1.84(a)(1) ........................ 6-16§ 1.84(a)(2) ...............6-25, 9-59§ 1.84(b) .................6-24, 11-19§ 1.84(c) ............................. 6-19

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

T–34

Page 35: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

§ 1.84(f) ............................. 6-16§ 1.84(g) ............................. 6-16§ 1.84(h) ............................ 6-17§ 1.84(h)(2) ........................ 6-17§ 1.84(i) ......................6-9, 6-17§ 1.84(k) ............................ 6-17§ 1.84(l) ............................. 6-18§ 1.84(m) ..................6-18, 6-21§ 1.84(n) ..................6-18, 6-23,

.......................6-24, 14-11§ 1.84(p)(1) ........................ 6-18§ 1.84(p)(3) ........................ 6-18§ 1.84(s) ........................... 15-42§ 1.84(t) ............................. 6-18§ 1.85(a) ............................ 6-15§ 1.96(b) ....... 6-25, 9-49, 15-41§ 1.96(b)(1) ...................... 15-41§ 1.96(b)(2) ...................... 15-41§ 1.96(c) ........................... 15-41§ 1.96(d) .......................... 15-41§ 1.97(a) ............................ 2-26§ 1.97(b) .......................... 10-12§ 1.97(c) ........................... 10-12§ 1.97(d) .......................... 10-13§ 1.97(e) ........................... 10-12§ 1.97(f) ........................... 10-12§ 1.98 ....................2-37, 10-12,

.....................10-13, 11-23§ 1.98(a)(2) ...................... 10-16§ 1.98(b) .......................... 10-14§ 1.98(c) ........................... 10-16§ 1.98(d) .......................... 10-16§ 1.102 .............................. 2-29§ 1.115 .............................. 1-10§ 1.115(a) ...............2-26, 8-105§ 1.115(b)(1) ...................... 2-26§ 1.117(8)(a) ...................... 19-6§ 1.121(b)(3) ...................... 19-7§ 1.126 .............................. 8-55§ 1.131 .............................. 10-7§ 1.136 .................10-12, 17-34§ 1.139 .............................. 12-2§ 1.151 .............................. 11-9§ 1.152 ..... 11-17, 11-19, 11-20

§ 1.152–1.155 .................. 11-10§ 1.153 ............................ 11-14§ 1.153(a) .............11-10, 11-12§ 1.153(b) .......................... 11-9§ 1.154 ............................ 11-10§ 1.155 ...................2-29, 11-23§ 1.161 .............................. 13-6§ 1.162 .............................. 13-6§ 1.163(a) .................13-7, 13-8§ 1.163(c) ........................... 13-6§ 1.164 .............................. 13-9§ 1.165(a) ........................ 13-10§ 1.165(b) ........................ 13-10§ 1.166(b) ........................ 13-10§ 1.167 .............................. 13-6§ 1.167(a) .......................... 13-4§ 1.167(b) .......................... 13-5§ 1.171 .............................. 19-6§ 1.172 .....................19-6, 19-8§ 1.173(a) .......................... 19-7§ 1.173(b) .......................... 19-6§ 1.173(e) ........................... 19-6§ 1.175 .....................19-6, 19-8§ 1.176 .............................. 2-31§ 1.178 .............................. 19-6§ 1.205(a) ........................ 8-105§ 1.219 ..........................2EX-52§ 1.291 ............................ 19-10§ 1.332 ................................ 2-9§ 1.334 ................................ 2-9§ 1.607(c) ......................... 10-10§ 1.704(b)(6) ...................... 2-26§ 1.704(c)(8) .................... 10-12§ 1.704(d) ........................ 10-12§ 1.801 ............................ 17-31§ 1.801 et seq. ........9-13, 17-31§ 1.801–1.809 .................. 17-31§ 1.802 ............................ 17-31§ 1.803 ............................ 17-33§ 1.804 ............................ 17-32§ 1.805 ............................ 17-32§ 1.806 ............................ 17-32§ 1.807 ............................ 17-32§ 1.808 ............................ 17-32

Table of Authorities

T–35(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Page 36: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

§ 1.821 ......... 2-22, 9-43, 17-34§ 1.821–1.825 ..........2-40, 9-44,

.....................17-33, 17-34§ 1.821(c) ......................... 17-34§ 1.821(e) ......................... 17-34§ 1.823 .................17-33, 17-34§ 1.824 ............................ 17-34§ 2.15(a) ............................ 2-26§ 3.11 ................................ 2-10

§ 3.31 ................................ 2-11§ 3.37(b) ............................ 19-6§ 3.61 .............................. 14-11§ 3.73(b) .............................. 2-8§ 5.2 ..............................2EX-51§ 5.11 .............................. 18-11§ 11.9 ............................2EX-52§ 55 ................................... 2-28§ 78 ................................... 2-28

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINATIONPROCEDURE

§ 201.03 ............................ 4-10§ 201.11 ............................ 9-46§ 201.13 ............................ 2-28§ 201.14(b) ........................ 2-28§ 201.15 ............................ 2-28§ 211.01(a) ...................... 11-12§ 211.01(b) .......................... 1-7§ 215 ................................. 2-28§ 302.03 .............................. 2-9§ 302.05 .............................. 2-9§ 310 ................................. 2-21§ 403 ................................... 2-8§ 503 ................................. 2-44§ 509.02 .............................. 2-9§ 601 .......................2-18, 8-20,

............. 12-8, 12-9, 12-10§ 601.01 .............................. 2-4§ 601.01(f) ........................... 6-4§ 601.02 .............................. 2-8§ 602 ................................... 2-6§ 608 ................................... 9-5§ 608.01(a) ..... 9-34, 9-43, 9-51§ 608.01(b) ...............2-25, 9-91§ 608.01(c) ...... 2-22, 2-23, 9-51§ 608.01(d) ...............2-23, 9-80§ 608.01(g) ................2-23, 9-61§ 608.01(h) ........................ 2-24

§ 608.01(m) ....2-24, 8-21, 8-53,................ 8-54, 8-55, 8-62

§ 608.01(n) ........................ 8-60§ 608.01(o) ........................ 9-16§ 608.01(p) .... 9-27, 9-56, 9-73,

...... 9-80, 9-82, 16-7, 17-9§ 608.01(r) ......................... 9-52§ 608.01(v) ..........8-125, 8-126,

.........................9-79, 9-87§ 608.02 .......... 2-17, 6-3, 6-16,

...... 6-22, 6-23, 6-24, 6-25§ 608.02(b) .......................... 6-6§ 608.02(d) .......................... 6-7§ 609 ....................10-13, 10-15§ 609(2) ........................... 10-16§ 706.03(y) ........................ 8-64§ 708 ................................. 2-29§ 708.02(a) ........................ 2-30§ 801 et seq. ...................... 8-18§ 802.01 .......................... 8-109§ 803(II) ........................... 8-109§ 803.02 ....... 8-64, 8-67, 8-110§ 804 ................................. 9-60§ 806.05 .......................... 8-110§ 809 ............................... 8-109§ 904.01(c) ....................... 11-22§ 1302.04(b) ...................... 8-10

T–36

HOW TO WRITE A PATENT APPLICATION

Page 37: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props

§ 1403 ............................... 19-5§ 1410 ............................... 19-6§ 1410.01 .......................... 19-8§ 1411 ............................... 19-6§ 1412.01 .................19-4, 19-7§ 1412.02 .......................... 19-7§ 1412.03 .......................... 19-7§ 1414 ......................19-6, 19-8§ 1417 ............................... 19-9§ 1442 ............................... 19-9§ 1442.04 .......................... 19-9§ 1502 ............................... 11-2§ 1503.01 ............11-10, 11-11,

......... 11-12, 11-13, 11-14§ 1503.02 ............11-13, 11-17,

....................11-18, 11-19,

.....................11-20, 11-21§ 1504 ........ 11-4, 11-21, 11-22§ 1504.01(b) .................... 11-11§ 1504.01(d) ...................... 11-6§ 1504.02 .......................... 11-7§ 1504.05 .............11-13, 11-15§ 1504.30 .......................... 2-29§ 1512 ............................... 11-9§ 1601 ............................... 13-3§ 1603 ............................... 13-6§ 1605 ......................13-8, 13-9§ 1606 ............................. 13-10§ 1607 ............................. 13-10§ 1609 ......................13-4, 13-6§ 1610 .......... 13-7, 13-9, 13-10§ 1612 ............................... 13-7§ 2001.06(a) ...................... 10-8§ 2001.06(b) .............10-8, 10-9§ 2001.06(c) ..........10-10, 10-11§ 2001.06(d) .................... 10-10§ 2004(10) ......................... 10-6§ 2004(11) ......................... 10-7

§ 2004(13) ....................... 10-15§ 2004(18) ......................... 10-8§ 2103(III) ......................... 7-18§ 2104 ............................... 7-18§ 2105 .............. 7-4, 7-18, 8-17§ 2106 .............. 7-2, 7-18, 7-50§ 2106(I) .............................. 7-5§ 2106.01 .............15-30, 15-34§ 2106.02 ........................ 15-30§ 2107.02 .............16-11, 17-10§ 2111 ................................. 8-8§ 2111.02 .......................... 8-25§ 2111.03 ....... 8-27, 8-28, 8-31§ 2113 ............................... 8-69§ 2141 ............................... 8-14§ 2143 ............................... 8-14§ 2144.05 .................8-98, 8-99§ 2163 ............................... 9-12§ 2163.03 .......................... 14-5§ 2164 ............................... 9-18§ 2164.02 .......................... 9-27§ 2165 ............................... 9-29§ 2172.01 ........................ 8-126§ 2173.0 .............................. 8-8§ 2173.01 ........................ 8-120§ 2173.05(e) ..................... 8-113§ 2173.05(g) ..................... 16-17§ 2173.05(h) ....8-63, 8-64, 8-65,

.............8-66, 8-120, 16-15§ 2173.05(i) ....................... 9-89§ 2173.05(k) .............8-48, 8-49§ 2173.05(p) ...........8-69, 16-16§ 2401 et seq. .................. 17-31§ 2401–2421 .................... 17-33§ 2421.02 ........................ 17-33§ 2422.03(a) ...................... 2-22§ 2422–2431 .................... 17-35

T–37(Sheldon, Rel. #5, 4/18)

Table of Authorities

Page 38: Table of Authorities · Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. .....8-100 3M Innovative Props