t , I :, :~u l 18

c-- -- ~--- _ ----- _- I t _ 1 i1 2 ~ - I Jl i i-~--~---7

I i Imiddot Ordinance No 90-45 ~u l_ ~ I 5 900 18

C c AU ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTi OF SARASOTA FLOR DA SA~ ~-eA CClJNn a ) ~sect_NDING SARASOTA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 89-35 F~r4~o~G JEPl0

t0 -c RglcATING TO THE ADOPTION OF AN IMPLEMENTATION w ANO REGULATION FRAMEWORK FOR THE I-75 CORRIDOR~ -er m cc

(T) p~ (NO 86-01-SP) TO CORRECT A SCRIVENERS ER~OR_ - 0 ~ ON~FIGURE 1 THE I-75 CORRIDOR STUDY FUTURE LANB L_

0 er ij~E PLAN MAP PROVIDING FINDINGS AND PROVIDING ~~ LU ~EFFECTIVE DATE ~ J ~ a ex

C bull l llJ~

lL Jen -cx Tu n

BE IT ORDAINED Bi THE BOARD OF COUNTi COMMISSIONERS O~SARASOTA COUNTY FLORIDA rn ~

Section 1 Findings The Board of County Commissioners hereinafter referred to as the Board hereby makes the followingfindings

11 Sarasota County Ordinance No 89-35 contains a scriveners error on Figure 1 entitled the I-75 Corridor study Future Land Use Plan Map

12 The area south of Clark Road and east of Twin Lakes Park more particularly described below illustrated in Figure A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is incorrectly designated Low Density Residential (east of I-75 average 2 o DUAC)

Commence at the Northwest corner of Section 17 Township 37 South Range 19 East Sarasota County Florida thence run Southerly along the West line of said Section 17 for a distance of 39987 feet to the Intersection with the centerline of State Road No 72 (Clark Road) according to the map thereof filed in Road Plat Book 1 Page 45 of the Public Records of Sarasota County Florida for the POINT OF BEGINNING thence run Easterly along said centerline for a distance of 1021 3 feet plusmn to the intersection of the Northerly extension of the Easterly line of Lot 5 LAKEWOOD TRACT C - UNIT 1 according ~o the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 8 Page 37 of said Public Records thence run Southerly along said Northerly extension and the Easterly line of said Lot 5 and Lot 32 for a distance of 81115 feet plusmn to the intersection with a line 190 feet Southerly of and parallel with the North line of said Lot 32 thence run Westerly along said parallel line for a distance of 22943 feet+ to the intersection with the West line of said Lot 32 thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 32 and its extension a distance of 37848 feetplusmn to the intersection with the centerline of curlew Street according to said Plat of LAKEWOOD thence run Westerly along said centerline for a distance of 22946 feetplusmn to the intersection of the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 40 of said Plat of LAKEWOOD thence run Southerly along the West line of Lot 40 and its extension for a distance of 60080 feet plusmn to the Southwest corner of said Lot 40 thence run Westerly along the South line of Lots 38 and 39 to the Southwest cornP- rf ~ middot _ _~ ~ run ~or1 v a 1 rMf ~_ P~st

iiiamp~ V~ L-1- I- AVA Iamp -LW--bull1~- - v-J bull -v ___ ~ __ -bullbull-intersection with a line 25 feet South of and parallel with the South line of said Lot 72 thence run Westerly along said parallel line for a distance of 25168 feet + to the intersection with the Southerly extension of the West line of said Plat of LAKEWOOD thence run Northerly along the West line of said Plat for a distance of 245681 feet to the intersection with the centerline of said State Road No 72 thence run Easterly along said centerline for a distance of 14786 feetplusmn to the POINT

lrPf0lUNMIOF BEGINNING (OJWTY~w9CJlI lteEStCfRTnTHAT1NINJ Oflllaa ~ 40 ccAAECT COlf Ontl CRQNlflll 111MI OfflCc WITNl- fff tWG MG CflimN

__DAfl JIii 2 7 iW

LNJININllCUlllll011MI CIGIIW IMWIDDCUMIOfta lQMDOOCUllf

-1- _~N_

090-4~

13 Amendment of Sarasota County Ordinance No 89-35 is necessary to correct the scriveners error and to achieve consistency with Apoxsee the Revised and Updated Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan

14 Figure 1 of Ordinance No 89-35 is hereby amended such that the area illustrated in Figure A attached hereto is designated Veri Low Density Residential (less than 1 o DUAC)

1 5 The Board has received and considered the report of the Sarasota County Planning Commission concerning Ordinance No 90-4~ correcting the scriveners error

16 The Board has held a public hearing on Ordinance No 90-45 and has considered the information and testimony received at said public hearing

17 The Board sitting as the Sarasota County Land Development Regulation Commission has reviewed Ordinance No 90-45 and has found that it is consistent with the Sarasota County Comprehensiv~ Plan

18 In all other respects Ordinance No 89-35 remains unchanged

Section 2 Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon receipt of official acknowledgment from the Department of the State of Florida that this Ordinance has been filed with said Department

PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY FLORIDA THIS 24th DAY OF JULY 1990

ATTEST

KAREN E RUSHING Clerk of the Circuit Court and ExshyOfficio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Sarasota County Florida

By ~ Lfrac34J)f)b Kay ()aAa11d Deputy Clerk

-2-

l imiddot

ClARK ROAD

11I TWIN LAKtS CURLEW STREET

iC

FIGURE A

PARK

I l

Ii L===========J~======I ~~~ ir===========~HA~WK~HS~~ROA~O=======(r==M============= t1

(

1

tmiddot~rl i4 [j 11 n ~

__________________~-----------L---------A q ~~~~~~~BElmllm~IZmz~m1~~ZDl~~~lpound~~zm~llIIE~~-middot~~~--- ~~-ktfl JiatUftL middot frac34middotl~ ~-- ~~-1

AMENDMENT TO ADOPTED I-75 CORRIDOR STUDY FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP (NO 86-01 - SP)

AREA OF AMENDMENT TO CORRECT middotSCRIVENERS ERROR

I-75 CORRIDOR STUDY BOUNDARY

SCALE 0 25 50 MILE

-3-090 - 45

middot

a -c

r_ middot-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF HTHIN APPI10XIMJTELY OHE-HALF

SARASOTA LAND USE MILE ON

middoti middotmiddot middot --bullmiddotmiddot

- __

bull C

middotmiddot -~

middot

EITHER SIDE OF THE I-75 RIGHT OF WAY WITHIN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF SARASOTA COUNTY AND RELATING TO THE

--2

_ bull -

r middot -middot

IMPLEMENTATION Of THE SAMSOTJ COUNTY _ middot

-~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FINDINGS PROVIDING

PROVIDING FOR FOR THE ADOPTION

middotmiddotmiddot

OF AN IMPLEMENTATION AND REGULATION FRAMEWORK TO ACHIEVE I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN OBJECTIVES PROVIDING FOR THE IMPACT OF THIS ORDINANCE UPON OTHER COUNTY ORDINAl~CES AND REGULATIONS INCLUDING ZONING REGULATIONS PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY - AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

ORDIHJNCE iwmiddot 89-35 - middotJ

middotbullmiddot

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY FLORIDA

Section 1 Findj_ngs The Board of County Commissioners hereby makes the following findings

1 The Sarasota County Board of county Commissioners ac~ing as agent has filed an application for approval of an implementation and regulation program for the I-7 5 Corridor Plan for the hereinafter described area in Sarasota county pursuant to the Sarasota County Cornprehensive Plan and the Sector Planning Guidelines adopted by Ordinance 84-57 as amended

The area extending outward 2640 plusmn from both sides of the I-75 right-of-way from the ManateeSarasota County line to the city limits of the City of North Port

2 The criteria and boundaries for preparation of the I~75 Corridor Study were duly reviewed and approved pursuant to said Sector Plan Guidelines

3 bull The Sarasota County I-7 5 Corridor Plan as prepared was duly reviewed by the Development Review Committee and a recommendation was made thereon by the Planning Department to the Sarasota County Planning Commission and the Sarasota county Interstate Planning Advisory Committee (IPAC) which is an advisory committee to the Board of County Commissioners concerned with making recommendations on land use adjacent to Interstate 75 in Sarasota County

4 bull The Interstate Planning Advisory Committee held duly noticed public meetings on said Sarasota County I-75 Corridor Plan (tector Plan No 86-1-SP) received all pertinent evidence and recommended approval of =-he Sarasota County I-75 Corridor Plan (Sector Plan No 86-1-SP) subJect to certain conditions as provided in the Interstate Planning Advisory Committee Recommendatiqn to the Board of County Commissioners of s~rasota County

~- 5 bull middot The Sarastni County Planning Commission he J duly noticed public

hea~~ng~ on said Sarasota County I-75 Corridor Plan received all per~~nent evidence and recommended approval of the Sarasota County I-75 Corrido1 Pla1 (Sector Plan No 86-1-SP) su-j ect to certain conditions as provided in the Planning Commission Recommendation to the Board of Coun-y C_omrnissionCrs of Sarasota county f

STATE 0 notOA I

COUNTY 0 5AftASOTA I~

I MCJtCIN CERTl-Y Tl1A T THE -OREGOIHO IS A

ffilJC AHO C~RCCT COPY or THE ORIGINAL 1US

Tl-41S ~-ICC WITNE~cv~-tO~N~gclAL-1- 5CAL THIS DATC _ __u___j__ _~________1~0

KACN C AUSl-flNC CURt( 0- THC CIRCUIT COURT

~~LLK TO Tl-4C BOARD Of COUNTY

CONM4~c SARAsplc= ~lOftlOA rr tz f211 l(l J Bo122ZIZ~

0pound1TYCLLI(

089-35

6 The Board of County Commissioners after due public notice held public hearings to consider said Sarasotci County_ I-7 5 Corridor Plan (Sector Plan No 86-1-SP) the r~commendations of the Intetstate Planning Advisory Committee (IPAC) the County Planning Commission and all matters relevant to said application including the testimony of the general public

7 On March 13 1989 the Board of County Commissioners (the BOARD) adopted the future land use designations of the proposed Sarasota County I-75 Corridor Plan (Sector Plan No 86-1-SP) as ilmended by the Board as part of the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan The I-75 Corridor study Future Land Use Plan Map as amended by the Board attached hereto as Figure 1 and incorporated herein by reference is compatible with and furthers the goals objectives policies land uses densities and intensities in said Comprehensive Plan

8 The Board of County Commissioners sitting as the Sarasota County Land Development Regulation Commission has reviewed the proposed ordinance and has found that -it is consistent with - the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan middot

Section 2 Adoption of the Implementation and Regulation Framework of the I-75 Corridor Plan

1 A true copy of the document entitled Sarasota County I-75 Corridor Plan and Appendices as amended by the Board of County Commissioners shall be maintained by the Sarasota County Planning Department

2 Pursuant to the Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the regulations adopted by Sarasota County Ordinance No 84-57 as amended and based on the evidence and testimony and the foregoing findings the Board of county Commissioners hereby adopts the I-75 Corridor Study Future Land Use Plan Map as amended by the Board attached hereto as Figure 1 and incorporated herein by reference

3 Future development orders for Developments of Regional Impact rezonings site and development plans preliminary subdivision plans and final subdivision plans and approvals of critical area study plans shall be consistent with the I-75 Corridor Study Future Land qse Plan Eap adopted herein and the provisions contained in Exhibit A ottached hereto and incorporated herein by reference

4 The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Chapter 7 Implementation Framework of the I-75 corridor study as amended by the Board of County Commissioners attached hereto as Exhibits B and C and incorporated herein by reference

Section 3 Relationship to Other Reaulations and Applicabilitv

l The above-referenced I-75 Corridor Plan does not in itself grant development approval nor guarantee such approval nor does it modify the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan or exempt any person or development activity from the requirements thereof

2 The provisions of the I-75 Corridor Plan shall prevail over any inconsistent z0ning or other land development regulations The existence of 2 middot middotning less intense than the future uses indicated in the I-75 Corridor Plan shall not however be deemed by itself to be i ncons istP-rd- v~ t r t-h P- T-7 S Cnrri tP1~ Plar oarticula~middotly when adequate

middotmiddot-- l -- -middotmiddot - i_- --~-- - - -districts

3 bull Thf~ plan only affects the unincorporated areas of Sarasota County within th -middot I-75 Corridor as defined in rection 11 above

STATC OF n OfU0A )

COUNTY 0 SAlIASOTA )

I HClltEBY CEATIN nvT n-cc OREGOING 15 A

TRUC ANO CORRECT CCPY Obull n-4E ORIGINAL nLCS

N s CFFICbull- TNuer ~A~ wIAL SpoundAl nos 0TC _____ ____xz_____

-2- KARpoundpound RLmiddot~tING C~CRK er nt CIRCUIT COVRT

C-ofn~YiL(P( TO TI O)AF-0 or COUNTY

bullM~tStJgplcnJJ~~ nCgtRIOA n middot ~rA_~4c-

OCPVTYCLLlIK

I v

Section 4 Severability If any provision of this Ordinance is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutiana_l by any co~rt of competent jurisdiction such provision shall be deemed a separate distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions

-middot Section 5 Effective Date middot -This Ordinance shall take ef feet immediately upon receipt of official ac~nowledgment from the Department of State of the State of Florida that this ordinance has been filed with said Department

PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sarasota County Florida this3td__ day of October 1989

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY RIDA

By

ATTEST middot ~ lt middot -

KAREN E RUSHING Clerk of the Circuit Court and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Sarasota CountyFlorida

By Deputy

middotmiddotmiddotlt~ STAT cr n_OAIOA t

CCJVtltTY ~ SA__ SOT A )

-3-

EXHIBIT A

CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMEHT APPROVAL FOR I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN (HO middot 86-1-SP)

1 - Until applicable Level of Service (LOS) s ~andards become effective as a result of the ~poxsee update andor the Land Development Regulations (LDR) all future development within the I-75 Corridor shall demonstrate prior to rezoning approval capacity and availability of essential urban services including roadways central water and sewer police fire and emergency medical services Documents from the appropriate service providers andor County- Departments shall be submitted to the Planning Department as part of the rezoriing application

2 All future development requiring rezoning shall connect to a County approved utility providing central water and wastewater treatment service to the I~75 Corridor Temporary on-site water and sewage treatment systems may be allowed consistent with Chapter 381272 Florida Statutes until central facilities become available Such temporary systems if authorized by the Board of County Commissioners must be approved by the County Pollution Control Division and the County Health Department These systems may be developed and utilized only on a scale and to the extent necessary to serve actual development up to the time that the central utility service becomes available Temporary systems shall connect to central facilities when they become available

3 Actual residential densities for those areas designated for residential use on the I-7 5 Corridor Future Land Use Plan Map (Figure 1) and designated in Urban or Urban Enclave Areas on the Aooxsee Future Land Use Plan Map shall be determined through the application of the Apoxsee Urban Area Residential Checklist and Density Matrix as a guide at the time of rezoning All future moderate-density development as shown on Figure 1 shall be allowed a density of at least 46 DUacre consistent with the Environmenshytal Plan Element of the Aooxsee update Residential densities for those areas designated within either Semi-Rural or Rural Areas on the Aooxsee Future Land Use Plan Map shall not exceed one unit per two acres or one unit per five acres respectively

4 A new Critical Area Plan or an amendment to an adopted Sector Plan shall be required prior to or concurrent with rezoning for each of the designated Commercial Highway Interchange (CHI) Areas (ie Clark Road and River RoadI-75 interchange areas) Major Employment Centers (MEC) (ie expansion areas for the Frmicroitville Industrial Area the northeast quadrant of the Bee Ridge RoadI-75 interchange area and northeast quadrant of the Jacaranda BoulevardI-75 inte~change area) and Hajor Employment Center Interstate Regional Office Park (MECIROP) areas (j_e southwest and southeast quadrants of the University ParkwayI-75 interchange area orthwest quadrant of the Fruitville RoadI-75 _intercha~ge area and the southeast quadrant of the Jacaranda BoulevardI-75 interchange area) This shall also include a redevelop~ent plan for the Palmer Boulevard area west of I-75 The key i~3ues for each area as presented in this ordinance (Exhibit B) shall be addressed and i mpacts mitigated through the Critical Area Planning Stndv T)--- - middot-- - -~-- - )~- ron-no-t-cmiddot ~hi-h t rp re au iren ~ -0

pr~Jc1t utvtLu1-1rntuL u1 rte91onc~J 1mpac1 UKi middotmiddots) tn1s procr-ss mc1y be substituted for a Critical rea Plan subject to the pr0visions of the Critical Area Plan regtlations

5 bull V~getative buffers between future development and watercourses as aesignated in the I-75 Corridor Plan shall be established to protect future development in the vicinity of the watercourse from potential flood damage create wildlife corridors prcvide habitat enhancement and improve the quality of ~tftEt1-degah-eel~i-JJ9 the watercourse The habitat areas to be inclu~Offt~~se buffer areas consistent with the Apoxsee Manage~cGtt~~~cGOC~~ Js

TRUC ANO c~RCCT CCPf or 1-4C ~IG(NAL n u~nCJAL

h -1 THIS orn- ~bullToct~ Hg tllllt-srA1 Tl I~ CATT -

- r ri- o THC c~urT COU9TK1~I r_ R_c r_bullbull ~bullbull bull bull

01-r~~ f -~ TO THC 80AR0 or COUNTY

CltbullJ6~F-J~ bull_~yfr ~~IOA l 1 J f L - ~ L~ZV r

middot

indicated in the Environmental systems section Chapter 6 of the I-7 5 Corridor Study The widths of these buffe~ _ areas may be variable as established through middot detailed basin-wide or local drainage studies which address a variety of localized f~c~ors including native habitat protection future land use compat1b1l1 ty water quality considerations flood potentials and existing flood regulations However i~ li~~ of such ~tudies ~uffer ~reas a~ong watercourses which have s1gn1f1cant environmental or native habitat values associated with them (refer to Chapter 6 of the I-75 corridor Plan) as determined by the County Natural Resources Transportation and Planning Departments shall be a minimum of 200 feet in width measured from the top of the bank of the watercourse Watercourses which are primarily man-made or have no or few significant environmental features associated with them (eg mesic hammocks) shall have a minimum buffer of 30 feet in width measured from the top of the bank unless otherwise established through a basimdde or local drainage study If mesic hammocks have become established along a man-made ditch the buffer shall be 30 feet in width measured from the top of the bank or shall extend to the upland edge middotof the hammock whichever is farther Modifications of these buffer requirements may bemiddot approved by the appropriate departments (Natural Resources Transportation and Planning) in considering native habitat protection future land use compatibility water quality protection flood potentials and existing flood regulations Applications for development approvals shall depict the buffer area including widths and any proposed limited areas of passive recreation landscaping stormwater retentiondetention fences andor other man-made barriers on all appropriate preliminary plans and site and development plans middot subject to review and approval by the County Transportation Planning and Natural Resources Departments

6 As part of the special conservation management area for the Myakka River the mesic hammock habitat between River Road and the Myakka River shall be preserved and the slough-type system located on both sides of River Road shall be conserved (see Figure 20 Chapter 2 of the I-75 Corridor study) The CHI designation in proximity to the River RoadI-75 interchange shall be allowed to proceed consistent with Condition No 4 above

7 Proper and effective measures shall be taken to ensure protection of endangered threatened and rare wildlife and plants identified prior to future development Such measures including__ possible integration of critical habitat into open space areas shall be reviewed and approved by the County Natural Resources Department in consultation with the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) at the preliminary or site and developmentplan stage

8 Proper and effective measures shall be taken to ensure protection or preservation of historical and archaeological esour~es identified prior to future development Such measures including possible removal for study purposes or integration into open space are~s shlt1ll be reviewed and approved by the County Depar~rnent of Historical Resources in consultation with the County Planni~g De~artment at ~he preliminary plan or site and development plan_s~age if not earlier resolved through Critical Area Planning Studies Developments of Reg~onal Impact or rezonings

STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

KEY ISSUES FOR CRITICAL AREA l 1LANS WITHIN THE I-75 CORRIDOR

In recognition of I-75 as an area of critical concern all critical Area Plans 11 within the I-75 Critical Area of Concern shall be consistent with the following where applicable

(a) all relevant elements of the Comprehensive Plan

(b) protection of the environment natural and historical resources of the I-75 Corridor

(c) protection of watersheds used as public potable water supplies

( d) the values and functions of floodplains and the protection of lives and property from potenti~l flood damage

(e) drainage detention retention and water quality

( f) any adopted program of Sarasota County regarding reg ional stonnwater detention facilities and downstream flood control

(g) efficient use of water sewer and other necessary public facilities

(h) bull the vehicular capacity of I-7 5 its interchanges and other related portions of the roadway network

( i) compatibility with surrounding land uses and the protection of the integrity of established residential neighborhoods

( j ) market demand and maximizing the use of the available labor supply

( k) the ability of people to find adequate housing accessible to their places of employment

( 1) any adopted urban design program for the I-75 Corridor by implementing measures for mitigating noise light and air impacts from I-75 traffic on adjacent land uses and

(m) a positive image for I-75 through the establishment of quality development within a part-like setting

Where the DRI process takes the place of a Critical Area Plan the DRI Development Order shall address these same issues

STATI ~ POAIOt gt

C0UWTY ~ StftASOTA )

I HCRCBY CERTin THAT tradeC FORCGOING 15 A

TlIUE ANO CO~RCCT COPY er- ~c ORIGINAL FILLS

IN rns on-ice C)CT~ 1~degt~-nc1Al

5CAlTHIS0ATC -------------B-1 KAREN c RUSHl~Ki c~cn~ CF TH CIRCUT cou-r

O-0FF~LL~t TO ~c =~deg or COUNTY

COM~~~cR~raquo~~y~~In~~bullobullbullY L_li-- dJffi-LJ~D

OCrf CU~

EXHIBIT 11 C IMPLEMENTTIOH FRJMEWORK OF THE

I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN

To ensure successful implementction of this Plan further strategies for publicprivate sector cooperation and intergovernmental coordination a-e essential The following subsections present the principal implementation framework vital to the fo~ndation of the I-75 Corridor Plan

1 REGULATORY CONTROLS

To successfully implement the I-75 Corridor Plan _certain regulatory controls middotmust be developed This would involve modifications to existing regulations and creation of new approaches to regulatory control More specifically amendments to adopted Sector Plans within the I-75 Corridor for CHI and industrial areas are necessary Otherpossible regulatory approaches include creation of an IROP Zoning District an overlay zoning district formiddot the entire I-75 Corridor or special regulations and a reauirement for areawide ORI s for each Planning Segment - However to ensure better success in implementation of certain regulations on an areawide basis these investigations shall be a cooperative approach by the publ~c and private sectors of the community

With this perspective the County Planning Department shall develop appropriate urban design measures and regulatory controls for the I-75 Corridor These investigations by the Planning Department shall be coordinated through ccnsul tat-ion with the Street Tree Advisory Council FDCT community or civic groups property owners within the I-75 Corridor the County Forestry Division the County Transportation Department the County Utilities Department and -the Planning Departments of the Ci ties of Venice North Port and Sarasota and Manatee County

a Consistency with Existing Requlations

A number of Sector Plan Resolutions adopted for Commercial Highway Interchanges (CHI) and an industrial area need to be amended to allow full implementation of the I-75 Corridor Plan This includes Resolution Nos 88-375 and 88-414 to allow expansion of MEC uses within the Fruitville Industrial Area and Resolution Nos 85-373 and 87-613 to allow MECIROPs within the southeastern quadrant of the Jacaranda BoulevardI-75 interchange area and northwestern quadrant of the Fruitville RoadI-75 interchange area respectively These amendments shall occur after the adopt~on of the I-75 Corridor Plan to clarify the intent middotand improve the effectiveness of the adopted plan

b Overlay Zonina District or Special Regulations

middot- r - -

regulations for the I-7 5 Corridor middoti-ali be con~-idered for adoption which wou-d establish appearare noise abatement access standards and other mechanisms to achieve land use compatibility Under this concep~ the overlay district would contain specific prov is ions for landscaping buffers access control sfrac12Jnaae artificial0lighting and other design features t~AB~~p_plfed ~thin the I-75 Corridor Such an ove-fi1e~~ffridt would sufer7ede or augmen~ (not replace)Hc~~rtdl)nsrno1lc~bull~sA ex1st1ng ( or underlying) z ming distrci--etlt~11~r ltAi1=1middot ~~~fAL FiLCs

C-1

089-35

provisions of the underlying dis1=_ricts such as allowable uses residential - densities minimum- yard requiremepts and parking standards would still apply except to the extent these district regulations are superseded by the overlay zone

c Areawide ORI Process

To complement the coordinated planning for the I-7 5 Corridor options shall be considered to coordinate the impact assessment and development approval process Since the I-75 Corridor was divided into planning segments based on similar characteristics such as physical features and development patterns future development could bemiddot assess~d within these sub-areas An option which is available would be the areawide DRI process provided for in Chapter 38006 FS Under this program either a public or privately initiated areawide ORI could be processed for each of the planning segments to ensure development approvals are coordinated and impacts are uniformly assessed and mitigated on an areawide basis In conjunction with Sarasota Countys limited ORI Certification Demonstration Program this areawide approach could be further refined to address the unique characteristics and needs of the I-75 Corridor

d Interstate Regional Office Park Zoning District

To implement the potential IROP component within the MECIROP areas designated by the I-75 Corridor Plan it shall be necessary to create an Interstate Regional Office Park (IROP) Zoning District to be applied to MECIROP designations through the Critical Area Plan process Development of this ordinance would be a continuation of the wor~ already completed on an IROP zoning district through a contract with Frelich and Leitner in 1987 (see Chapter 1 Background of the I-75 Corridor Study) The draft ordinance prepared was patterned after the County PCD Ordinance but geared specifically to regional office pars This ordinance shall be reviewed and may have to be modified to account for new requirements resulting from the Apoxsee update the I-75 Corridor Plan and the PHH Fantus study

General design guidelines shall be considered to ensure a compatible mix of architectural design criteria and building designs which may include the submission of architectural renderings for review and approval by the County The inclusion of specific urban design requirements in an IROP Zoning District or at other phases of planning or development approval shall be addressed as part of an overall urban design program for the I-75 Corridor_

e Targetino Studies for IROPs and MECs

Further studies are needed to ensure that the viability of the MECITIOP sites is not compronised A targeting s+-n r~ - -- --- -- -- _YfrY-Tnfl ~1 n rn0rdi1Jt -i 07 ~bulli t h t h e County

UJ U CJJlULll_ 4 -~vcL-~-Jbull- ---j--a ~--i - bull -bull -bull- --L--~ 11- - Committee of 100 and the Triangle Economic Development Association) should be considered to emiddot1sure the attraction of best fit businesses to the I-75 Corridor Such a study would be helpful in forecasting market shifts and identifying the appropriate types and mixes of MEC and IROP uses based on an evaluation of businesses and industries that are e~tt~i-QC2JlP expanding or moving into the region AdditLmiddot-na~oes~atrgening study for the I-7 5 corridor Study Area ~i)v2En-r~~frac12r-inoraci12nti fy ~ng appropr1ate regulatory cha~~~~nramp9-cJl e cGQllilltl~~ls-pound5Z~ng

1

It -1-C CI~ r001 -~ ~~FflCIA

C-2 -~-bull

districts including those districts currently regulating MEC uses within the I-75 Corridor the creation of a~ I-75 overlay zone or special regulations and a separate IROP district (see above)

f Detailed Basin-wide Drainage Plans

l s part of the County s proposed Sto nmia t er Environmental Utility Program detailed basin-wide studies are needed to ensure stormwater management occurs through a basinshywide approach coordinated with future land use planning rather than on a parcel-by-parcel basis Within the I-75 Corridor the basins that need to be studied include the Braden River South Creek Shakett Creek Cow Pen Slough Curry Cree~ Myakka River and Deer Prairie Slough Basins These detailed basin-wide studies shall address such issues as areawide drainage improvements regional stormwater detention facilities flood storage a~eas flood compensation areas needed for any - encroachment into the floodplain middot middot buffer areas along watercourses potential pollution sources of both groundwater and surface water and the potential usage of stormwater as a public potable water source middot

_ ~

I HClltCltY CETIFY TI-VT TgtE -ORECOING tS A

nuc ANO cocT c--- c- THE OOIG4NAL 1LCS middot

IN THIS c-c rnbt+ ~-r -~nltIAL

bullCAL T11~ OATC -1-=__9_~itJJ-----C-3 KARr-N r_ nus-m~ CL~- ~ er- l-CE ClltCUrT ~

0-ltYFIClHiU1lt T~ Tl n rJOAnO o COUNTY

coos~bullbullA1A~fou~~10imiddot eY tf7UI ~ poundf10~2ar1

Olt VTY CLL K

wtlAlt CllllllTV IIOllillARY tJIASOTA OOUllY 001UJARY

1

FIGURE 1 I-75 CORRIDOR STUDY

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP 1

KEY VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 10 DUAC)

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (WEST OF 1-75 10 TO 45 DUAC)J (EAST OF I-75 AVERAGE 20 DUAC)

MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

1 As amended by Ordinance No 90-45

2 See Condition 3 of Exhibit A

0 1

cmiddoth f bull NorlK ~ort-

llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)

MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTER

MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTER INTERSTATE REGIONAL OFFICE PARK

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE

PROFESSIONAL OFFICE

COMMUNITY SERVICE FACILITY

COUNTY PARK

OTHER MAJOR OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS

POTENTIAL REGIONAL STORMWATER RETENTION FACILITY

POTENTIAL BASEBALL STADIUM SITE

FUTURE LAND USE PLANNING TO BE COMPLETED AS PART OF THE CLARK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

FUTURE REDEELOPMENT STUDY AREA

CONCEPTUAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED ROADWAYS

PROGRAMMED INTERCHANGE

PROPOSED INTERCHANGE

bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES

GRAPHIC ilY KARL RHYNE

090-4~

13 Amendment of Sarasota County Ordinance No 89-35 is necessary to correct the scriveners error and to achieve consistency with Apoxsee the Revised and Updated Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan

14 Figure 1 of Ordinance No 89-35 is hereby amended such that the area illustrated in Figure A attached hereto is designated Veri Low Density Residential (less than 1 o DUAC)

1 5 The Board has received and considered the report of the Sarasota County Planning Commission concerning Ordinance No 90-4~ correcting the scriveners error

16 The Board has held a public hearing on Ordinance No 90-45 and has considered the information and testimony received at said public hearing

17 The Board sitting as the Sarasota County Land Development Regulation Commission has reviewed Ordinance No 90-45 and has found that it is consistent with the Sarasota County Comprehensiv~ Plan

18 In all other respects Ordinance No 89-35 remains unchanged

Section 2 Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon receipt of official acknowledgment from the Department of the State of Florida that this Ordinance has been filed with said Department

PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY FLORIDA THIS 24th DAY OF JULY 1990

ATTEST

KAREN E RUSHING Clerk of the Circuit Court and ExshyOfficio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Sarasota County Florida

By ~ Lfrac34J)f)b Kay ()aAa11d Deputy Clerk

-2-

l imiddot

ClARK ROAD


iC

FIGURE A

PARK

I l


(

1






SCALE 0 25 50 MILE

-3-090 - 45

middot

a -c

r_ middot-




- __

bull C

middotmiddot -~

middot


--2

_ bull -

r middot -middot




middotmiddotmiddot



middotbullmiddot










STATE 0 notOA I








0pound1TYCLLI(

089-35














STATC OF n OfU0A )








OCPVTYCLLlIK

I v





By



By Deputy



-3-

EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


l imiddot

ClARK ROAD


iC

FIGURE A

PARK

I l


(

1






SCALE 0 25 50 MILE

-3-090 - 45

middot

a -c

r_ middot-




- __

bull C

middotmiddot -~

middot


--2

_ bull -

r middot -middot




middotmiddotmiddot



middotbullmiddot










STATE 0 notOA I








0pound1TYCLLI(

089-35














STATC OF n OfU0A )








OCPVTYCLLlIK

I v





By



By Deputy



-3-

EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


middot

a -c

r_ middot-




- __

bull C

middotmiddot -~

middot


--2

_ bull -

r middot -middot




middotmiddotmiddot



middotbullmiddot










STATE 0 notOA I








0pound1TYCLLI(

089-35














STATC OF n OfU0A )








OCPVTYCLLlIK

I v





By



By Deputy



-3-

EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


089-35














STATC OF n OfU0A )








OCPVTYCLLlIK

I v





By



By Deputy



-3-

EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


I v





By



By Deputy



-3-

EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


EXHIBIT A













middot





STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES






STAffOFncgtA10A J

COUNTY OF ~AA90TA J

- A-2 -

1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


1

089-35

B 11EXHIBIT

















STATI ~ POAIOt gt








OCrf CU~


I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES



I-75 CORRIDOR PLAN








middot- r - -


C-1

089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES


089-35










1


C-2 -~-bull




_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES





_ ~







Olt VTY CLL K


1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES



1








0 1


llEl1 llllla ltQAI)

DMOCIOR- 00

ClMI(- -D cg

bull X

(46 TO 130 DUAC)



COMMERCIAL


PROFESSIONAL OFFICE


COUNTY PARK









bull -1lti-

~ 0 50 10 2 MILES
