Upload
jennifer-swift
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
1/6
1
NO. N23N-CR-12-0132781-S
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
VS.
TAMARA SYTCH
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
SUPERIOR COURT
GEOGRAPHIC AREA
23
December 4, 2012
MOTION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS
The defendant, Tamara Sytch, through her undersigned counsel, respectfully requests this
court modify all existing No Contact Protective Orders to Partial Protective Orders for the purpose of
allowing the defendant, Tamara Sytch, to speak, and interact, withDamien Selvaggio, the party
classified as the victim under Connecticut Law.
In support of this request the defendant, Tamara Sytch, through her undersigned counsel,
represents as follows:
1) At this time a full no contact order is in place, preventing either party from having contact
with each other.
2) At this time, the defendant Tamara Sytch, and the party classified as the victim,Damien
Selvaggio, believe the order should be modified, and request, said action be taken, with the purpose
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
2/6
2
of the modification to allow the parties to speak over the phone and via electronic mail.
In further support of the Motion the defendant, Tamara Sytch, through her
undersigned counsel represents the following additional facts.
3) At this point the defendant, Tamara Sytch, has completed the detoxification portion of her
treatment at the Caron Foundation, and has been inpatient for a period of close to 50 days. Alcohol
or drugs will play no role in any interaction between the defendant, Tamara Sytch, andMr. Selvagio
which were at the center of, and the main cause of past events which led to court involvement. In
short the major contributing factor, which led to the defendants arrests, is no longer present.
4) Both parties have not spoken since approximately October 18, 2012, allowing for ample time
for the emotional elements of this case to subside and allowing both parties to interact like rational
adults.
5) Tamara Sytch is currently housed at Concept 90, in Harrisburg Pennsylvania, and any
contact will be via telephone or electronic mail. As a result, there exists no risk there will be another
domestic dispute like those that have already taken place and make up the subject matter of her
pending charges. This is an extremely regimented facility and any behavior deemed unacceptable
would lead to the loss of phone and inter-net privileges.
6) In addition, the purpose of the defendant participating in treatment is to allow her to address
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
3/6
3
certain issues and avoid finding herself in similar situations in the future. At this time the failure of
the parties to speak with each other has created a situation of uncertainty and questions for both
parties, which tends to undermine the defendants current treatment goals. In essence, it is easier to
concentrate on moving forward without questions lingering from the past. Allowing the parties to
speak would essentially allow for the possibility of closure and the ability for both to move forward.
7) In the undersigneds understanding these facilities are concerned with following court orders
and are only concerned with compliance of said orders. The undersigneds understanding is if the
court will allow contact, they take no issue with such a decision nor have an opinion.
8) Finally,Mr. Selvaggio has contacted the undersigned on numerous occasions offering
information that has been helpful to the undersigned in formulating and understanding a treatment
plan for the defendant. He has been polite, has thanked me for my becoming involved in the case
and can be described as an asset to the defense. To be clear, he has been an asset to the defense in
many ways providing a great deal of insight related to certain situations that has proven extremely
valuable. At this point the undersigned believesMr. Selvaggio has a great deal of insight to offer the
defendants treatment providers and this will only serve to benefit the defendant and her treatment
goals.
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
4/6
4
WHEREFORE, the defendant, Tamara Sytch, respectfully requests that the Motion for
Modification of Protective Order, be granted and modified from a Full Contact Order to a Partial
Protective Order, for the reasons stated therein and for such other grounds as may be asserted at a full
hearing on the merits thereof.
THE DEFENDANT
TAMARA SYTCH,
BY _______________________________________
Rob Serafinowicz (423695)
The Law Offices of Rob Serafinowicz, LLC
52 Holmes Avenue
Waterbury, CT 06702
Telephone Number: (203) 755-0267
Fax: (203) 528-4302
Her Attorney
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
5/6
5
O R D E R
The foregoing motion having been heard, it is hereby
ORDERED:
GRANTED / DENIED
THE COURT
BY__________________________, J.
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that service has been made upon the following counsel pursuant to the
Connecticut Rules of Practice:
Office of the States Attorney
Geographic Area 22
121 Elm Street
New Haven, CT 06510
______________________________________
7/30/2019 Sytch Motion for Modification
6/6
6
Rob Serafinowicz, Esquire