24
Systematic Theology OCTOBER 21 – WINDSOR LOCKS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH – TONY ARSENAL 1

Systematic Theology OCTOBER 21 – WINDSOR LOCKS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH – TONY ARSENAL 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Systematic Theology

Systematic TheologyOctober 21 Windsor Locks Congregational Church Tony Arsenal11Bibliology2Key AttributesWe affirm that the Scripture isDivine and HumanScripture ultimately originates with GodScripture is genuinely a product of human processesReliableWe can trust the Scriptures to accomplish that which God intended it to accomplishSufficientWe do not need to seek another source of revelation in order to know what we must knowClearWe do not need any special gifting by God to understand what the Scriptures are saying3Divine and HumanInspiredThe origin of Scripture is ultimately an activity of the Holy SpiritThis inspiration extends to the very words and word orders chosen by the human authorsDoes not mean dictation, the authors composed these books the same way any other author composes any other book in regards to human activityThe Holy Spirit providentially ensured that every word was exactly what he desiredIt is the text itself that is inspired, not the author / speaker of the textThe meaning of the text is found within the text itself

4ReliableInfallibleThe Bible is infallible, or unfailingThis means that whatever God is intending the Scripture to communicate, it never fails to communicateNot only does this mean that it never actually DOES fail, but that it is not capable of failingInerrantThe Bible contains no errors in what it affirmsIs not violated when the Bible records a lie, mistake, or other similar event in a historical text or quoteIs not violated by lack of precision or phenomenological languageKey points to rememberThis only applies to the original manuscriptTranslations are not inerrant, nor are original language manuscripts apart from the original5SufficientSola ScripturaProtestants affirm that the Scriptures contain all things necessary for salvation, faith, and good worksChurch traditions and interpretations are authoritative in so far as they are faithful interpretations of the ScriptureThere is no deposit of authoritative tradition outside of the Bible that is infallible or necessary for salvation that is not also presented within the BibleNothing outside the Bible is to be necessary for Salvation, regardless of its originNothing outside the Bible is to be binding on the conscience of a Christian, regardless of its originCircumstances and ElementsElements are things that are inherently a part of what Scripture is sayingCircumstances are things that are contextual to what Scripture is sayingCircumstances may change over time, but Elements do notGood and NecessaryAn extrapolated doctrine (the Trinity, the Hypostatic Union, etc) must be both good and necessaryGood Is a logical and rational understanding (usually a synthesis) of the textNecessary There must be no other reasonable understanding of the text

6ClearPerspicuityThere is no special spiritual or charismatic gifting required for interpretation of the Scripture beyond the illumination given to all ChristiansThis does not mean that all parts of the Scripture are equally clearThis does not mean that all persons (Christian or otherwise) are equally capableWestminster Confession of Faith 1.7All things in Scripture are not alike plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all; yet those things which are necessary to be known, believed, and observed for salvation, are so clearly propounded, and opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the learned, but the unlearned, in a due use of the ordinary means, may attain unto a sufficient understanding of themThis is an attribute of the textIf I read a text without my glasses, it is blurry because there is something wrong with my eyes, not with the textDoes not mean that we will all come to the exact same interpretationDoes not mean that nothing outside of Scripture is necessary for proper understanding

7Four Broad Views8The Spectrum Protestant Christianity9FundamentalismEvangelicalismNeo-OrthodoxLiberalismFundamentalismThe Bible is a collection of propositional truth statementsEssentially, this takes the Bible and assumes that EVERYTHING is an affirmationTends to miss the difference in genres and therefore misinterprets poetry, prophecy/apocalypse, and wisdom literatureThe meaning is inherent in the text, but the author is somewhat irrelevantBecause the Bible is a collection of propositional truth statements, the authorial intent is sometimes ignored (since the authorial intent is not always to make a propositional truth statement)

10EvangelicalismThe Bible is a collection of documents written for different purposes by different authorsRecognizes that each book must be taken on its own termsSometimes underemphasizes the divine authors intent in favor of the human authors intent, or assumes that those two things are identicalThe meaning is inherent in the text, but only in the human authors intended meaningSince the human authors intent is the primary location of the meaning, the divine authors intent is either hidden from us or identical with the human authors intent

11Neo-OrthodoxyRevelation is given through the text, but the text itself is not necessarily revelationThe text itself has inherent meaning, but that meaning is auxiliary and sometimes irrelevantDivine meaning (revelation) is given to the text by the Holy Spirit as we encounter and experience the text in communal interpretationThe text itself is not inerrant or infallibleThere are errors in the text, but since it is the Holy Spirit who gives meaning as we encounter it, that meaning is always infallibleThe original author may intend to communicate something, but fail to do so12LiberalismThe text is an artifact that we give meaning toThe text has no inherent meaning, rather we decide what the text means to usThe Bible is simply an account of various authors experiences of God, and reflects their culturesIs most certainly fallible and errantMany times, denies any sort of divine meaning to the text13Hermeneutics and Exegesis14Genres Old TestamentPenteteuch/Torah (Genesis-Numbers)Historical accounts of the origin and constitution of Israel as a nationFollows the same format as Ancient Near Eastern Suzerainty treatiesHistorical PrologueCovenant StipulationsCovenant Sanctions (Curses and Blessings)Historical Narratives (Joshua-Esther)Historical accounts of the United Monarchy, Divided Monarchies, Exile of Judah, Return from Exile, and Exilic LifeWisdom Literature (Job-Song of Songs/Solomon)Prophets/Apocalypse (Isaiah-Malachi)Major Prophets (Length, not importance) Isaiah, Jeremiah (and Lamentations), Ezekiel, and DanielMinor Prophets (Length, not importance) Hosea through MalachiOracular in nature, meaning that they often contain verbatim statements Thus saith the Lord15Genres New TestamentGospels (Matthew-Luke)Theological biographies of Jesus focusing on his life, ministry, and especially his death and resurrectionActsHistorical account of the growth of the Church immediately after the ascension of JesusInitially focuses on the original 11 disciples and the ministry in JudeaShifts to the ministry to the gentiles through the work of PaulEpistles (Romans-Jude)Pauline Epistles (Romans-2 Thessalonians) Occasional letters written to specific congregations with specific purposesPauline Pastoral Epistles (1 Timothy-Philemon, Hebrews) Occasional letters written to various elders/bishops/pastors with specific purposesGeneral Epistles (Hebrews-Jude) Occasional letters written by non-Pauline authors with no clear audienceRevelationProphetic / Apocalyptic book written initially to 7 specific congregations, but seemingly intended for general distributionHighly figurativeOracular16Other Considerations17Text CriticismThe discipline of Text Criticism is devoted to reconstructing the original text from the various manuscripts we haveWe can reconstruct the text with near certainty due to the voluminous amount of manuscript evidence we haveOperates based on various rules that are in play, but there is no formulaGenerally these criteria are usedThe older manuscript is preferredThe more difficult text is preferredThe more populous text is preferredSimple ExampleIf we have 10 manuscripts that are all copies of an original, we can reconstruct the original even if there is disagreement in the copies6 say The dog chased the cat up the tree3 say The dog chased the cat1 says The dog ______ the cat up the tree (Manuscript damage)We can be reasonably certain that the original read is The dog chased the cat up the tree18Texts and Accounts that likely unoriginalThe Pricopae AdultareThe account of the woman caught in adultery in John 7:53-8:11 is not in our earliest manuscriptsThe evidence for the non-Johannine origin of the periscope of the adulteress is overwhelming. Roger L. OmansonThe Long Ending of MarkThe longer ending of Mark 16:9-20 is likely a later additionContains doctrine which was common among the Montanist schismatic group, but not present in earlier forms of ChristianityComma JohanneumThe explicitly Trinitarian statement in 1 John 5:7-8 in some manuscripts is likely not an original part of the letterThis reading is absent in nearly all of the earliest Greek manuscripts, and is not quoted by any of the Greek Church Fathers19TranslationsTranslators have an agendaWhen you read an English Bible, it is an interpretation, since all acts of translation involve interpretationEven when we read from a Greek critical text, we are still getting an interpretation since doctrinal cohesion is one of the considerationsSome translations attempt to remain closer to the original formEnglish Standard Version (ESV) Has a broadly Reformed biasHolman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB/HCS) Has a broadly Baptist (particularly Southern Baptist) biasNew American Standard Bible (NASB) Consciously attempts to retain word order and word choice consistencySome translations attempt to represent the thought of the original authorNew International Version (NIV) Tries to translate thought for thought, and consciously attempts to represent the whole Evangelical traditionNew Living Translation (NLT) Tries to translate broad concepts into EnglishSome translations represent a full on interpretation, with little regard for original formThe Message (MSG) A paraphrase by Eugene PetersonThe Voice (VOICE) A collaborative paraphrase by various parties20Translations Comparisons John 1:1Greek - ESV - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.HCSB - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.NIV - In the beginning was the Word,and the Word was with God,and the Word was God.MSG - The Word was first, the Word present to God, God present to the Word. The Word was God, in readiness for God from day one. (1:1-2)VOICE - Before time itself was measured, the Voice was speaking. The Voice was and is God.Literal Word Order Translation In beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and [a] God was the WordTony Arsenal Version In the beginning, the Word was, and the Word was with God [the Father] and the Word possessed the divine nature

21BibliographyHorton, Michael.Pilgrim Theology: Core Doctrines for Christian Disciples. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2013..The Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims on the Way. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010.Omanson, Roger L, and Bruce M Metzger, German Bible Society.A Textual Guide to the Greek New Testament: An Adaptation of Bruce M. Metzgers Textual Commentary for the Neds of Translators. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaff, 2006.Sproul, R C.Can I Trust The Bible?. Sanford: Reformation Trust, 2009.22For Further ReadingBrown, Jeannine K.Scripture as Communication: Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.Fee, Gordon, and Douglas Stuart.How to Read the Bible Book by Book: A Guided Tour. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002..How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. Third Edition. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2003.Goldsworthy, Graeme.Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Sproul, R C.Can I Trust The Bible?. Sanford: Reformation Trust, 2009.23Reading for Next WeekChapters 10-12 (pp 246-301)Chapter 13 (pp 303-324)24