22
Highlights This Month: April 2018 represents the start of Summer 2018. All calculations are based off the summer capabilities.. SYSTEM UTILIZATION MONTHLY REPORT for the month ending http://www.tccustomerexpress.com/2885.html NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Published date: June 15th, 2018 April 2018

SYSTEM UTILIZATION MONTHLY REPORT - … · Highlights This Month: • April 2018 represents the start of Summer 2018. All calculations are based off the summer capabilities.. SYSTEM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Highlights This Month:

• April 2018 represents the start of Summer 2018. All calculations are based off the summer capabilities..

SYSTEM UTILIZATION MONTHLY REPORTfor the month ending

http://www.tccustomerexpress.com/2885.html

NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd.

Published date:June 15th, 2018

April 2018

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Utilization reports are posted approximately six weeks after the end of the reported month.

If you have any questions on the content of this report, contact Winston Cao at (403) 920-5315 or [email protected].

MONTHLY FEATURES PAGE Firm Transportation Service Contract Utilization ..................................................................... . 3 Design Capability Utilization Upper Peace River ...................................................................................................................... .. 4 Upper & Central Peace River ..................................................................................................... . 5 Peace River Design ..................................................................................................................... . 6 Upstream James River ................................................................................................................ . 7 Eastern Alberta Mainline (James River to Princess) .................................................................. . 8 Western Alberta Mainline (AB/BC & AB/Montana Borders) ................................................... . 9 Rimbey Nevis – Flow Within ................................................................................................... .10 South & Alderson – Flow Within ............................................................................................... .11 Medicine Hat - Flow Within ....................................................................................................... .12 Eastern Alberta Mainline (Princess to Empress/McNeill) .......................................................... .13 Ft. McMurray Area – Flow Within…………………………………………………………… ...14 Kirby Area – Flow Within……………………………………………………………………….15 North of Bens Lake – Flow Within ............................................................................................. ..16 North & South of Bens Lake – Flow Within…………………………………………………….17 Future Firm Transportation Service Availability ....................................................................... .18 How to Use This Report ................................................................................................................ .19 REFERENCES NGTL Design Areas Map ............................................................................................................. 20 NGTL Pipeline Segments Map ..................................................................................................... 21 Definition of Terms ........................................................................................................................ 22

FIRM TRANSPORTATION SERVICE1 CONTRACT UTILIZATION3

By NGTL Pipeline Segments

Apr CD Apr CDSegment Contract Utilization (TJ/d) Utilization (MMcf/d) UPRM FT 0% 0.0 80% 79

FT + IT2 0% 81%

PRLL FT 48% 30.4 83% 245FT + IT 54% 87%

NWML FT 100% 6.9 82% 359FT + IT 114% 82%

GRDL FT 0% 5.0 91% 2,930FT + IT 536% 91%

WAEX FT 61% 7.0 70% 892FT + IT 318% 70%

JUDY FT 56% 16.8 81% 45FT + IT 60% 83%

GPML FT 54% 158.4 78% 4,895FT + IT 130% 79%

CENT FT 0% 0.0 75% 2,268FT + IT 0% 76%

LPOL FT 64% 96.2 76% 1,011FT + IT 68% 80%

WGAT FT 79% 3,930.0 96% 240FT + IT 81% 108%

ALEG FT 54% 386.9 97% 617FT + IT 56% 114%

SLAT FT 30% 179.3 98% 132FT + IT 30% 146%

MLAT FT 71% 262.3 89% 90FT + IT 71% 135%

BLEG FT 48% 155.5 99% 380FT + IT 53% 128%

EGAT FT 99% 4,793.0 79% 15FT + IT 102% 125%

MRTN FT 32% 20.2 69% 41FT + IT 34% 93%

LIEG FT 70% 2,091.3 57% 32FT + IT 70% 85%

KIRB FT 82% 1,630.7 75% 31FT + IT 82% 97%

SMHI FT 44% 12.0 54% 19FT + IT 44% 90%

REDL FT 26% 19.0 33% 22FT + IT 30% 96%

COLD FT 54% 180.0 33% 16FT + IT 61% 93%

EDM FT 46% 1,846.0 81% 32FT + IT 46% 127%

NLAT FT 72% 30.6 93% 107FT + IT 72% 114%

WAIN FT 24% 0.4 92% 4FT + IT 24% 146%

ELAT FT 83% 288.4 87% 95FT + IT 85% 129%

TOTAL SYSTEM FT 78% 16,146.4 82% 14,598FT + IT 81% 86%

*NOTE:

billed volumes divided by applicable receipt or delivery Contract level.

Delivery Receipt

April 2018

1. FT includes all receipt and delivery Firm Transportation Services.2. IT includes receipt and delivery Interruptible Services.3. Utilization data is based on billed monthly volumes. Percent utilization calculated as FT and FT + IT

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Upper Peace River

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

35% 34%37%

Ave LF:

33%

4

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONUPPER PEACE RIVER

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr37% 34% 32% 32% 35% 33%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

5

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONUPPER and CENTRAL PEACE RIVER

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr85% 89% 89% 92% 100% 102%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Upper and Central Peace River

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

74% 91%71%

Ave LF:

102%

6

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONPEACE RIVER DESIGN(Upper, Central and Lower Peace River)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Peace River Design

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

85% 90%89%

Ave LF:

93%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr87% 90% 90% 91% 94% 93%

Average Flow/

% Design Capability Utilization

7

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONUPSTREAM JAMES RIVER(Edson Mainline, Peace River Design and Marten Hills)

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr95% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Upstream James River

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

96% 98%95%

Ave LF:

100%

8

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONEASTERN ALBERTA MAINLINE(James River to Princess)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Eastern Alberta Mainline - James River to Princess

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

107% 113%112%

Ave LF:

125%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr108% 111% 113% 115% 116% 125%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

9

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATION WESTERN ALBERTA MAINLINE(Alberta/B.C. and Alberta/Montana Borders)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Western Gate - Alberta / BC & Alberta / Montana Borders

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

97% 104%95%

Ave LF:

95%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr100% 105% 107% 103% 107% 95%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

10

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONRIMBEY-NEVIS – FLOW WITHIN

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr29% 31% 37% 34% 33% 37%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

Rimbey Nevis - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

22% 33%19%

Ave LF:

37%

11

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONSOUTH and ALDERSON – FLOW WITHIN

0

50

100

150

200

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

South and Alderson - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

41% 42%47%

Ave LF:

31%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr38% 43% 44% 49% 36% 31%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

12

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONMEDICINE HAT – FLOW WITHIN

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

Medicine Hat - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

68% 69%84%

Ave LF:

60%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr64% 67% 73% 75% 68% 60%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

13

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATION EASTERN ALBERTA MAINLINE(Princess to Empress / McNeill)

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91% 91% 96% 97% 93% 114%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dThroughput vs. Design Capability

Eastern Gate - Empress & McNeill Borders

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

94% 94%85%

Ave LF:

114%

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONFT. McMURRAY AREA – FLOW WITHIN

14

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

Ft. McMurray Area - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

65% 87%82%

Ave LF:

79%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr82% 88% 88% 89% 86% 79%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONKIRBY AREA – FLOW WITHIN

15

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr89% 89% 87% 91% 91% 88%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

Kirby Area - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

83% 89%92%

Ave LF:

88%

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONNORTH OF BENS LAKE – FLOW WITHIN

16

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

North of Bens Lake - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

70% 82%77%

Ave LF:

81%

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr79% 81% 83% 85% 80% 81%

Average Flow/

% Design Capability Utilization

DESIGN CAPABILITY UTILIZATIONNORTH & SOUTH OF BENS LAKE – FLOW WITHIN

17

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr80% 82% 84% 86% 81% 82%

% Design Capability UtilizationAverage

Flow/

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

Nov-16

Dec-16

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

103m3/dTotal Deliveries vs. Design Capability

North and East - Delivery Capability

Historical Flow Gas Year Markers Capability

mmcf/d

70% 83%77%

Ave LF:

82%

FUTURE FIRM TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AVAILABILITY

Estimated Firm Transportation Service Availability

Please refer to the following web site for

current FT-R / FT-D Availability Maps:

http://www.tccustomerexpress.com/2801.html

Please consult with your CustomerAccount Manager to discuss your FirmTransportation Service needs.

18

HOW TO USE THIS REPORT

Overview

This report contains recent historical information on the level of utilization of firm transportation ServiceAgreements on the NGTL system, relative usage of interruptible service, level of utilization of designpipeline capacity.

Data is reported either by Pipeline Segment (26 segments make up the system, without 23 & 27) or DesignArea (13 Design Areas for the system). Maps of both are included in the reference section.

Firm Transportation Service Contract Utilization

The Firm Transportation Service Contract Utilization report shows the percent utilization for each of the 26NGTL pipeline segments and 3 major export delivery points comprising the total system. The utilizationdata is based on billed monthly volumes. Percent utilization is calculated as firm transportation service andfirm transportation service + interruptible service divided by applicable receipt or delivery contract level.Historical Data involving billed volumes lags the current date by approximately two months.

Design Capability Utilization

The load factor/segment flow graphs show actual flow versus design capability values for various NGTLsystem areas. The graphs also show seasonal (winter/summer) design capability and average load factors(LF) for each season. Load factors are obtained by comparing the receipt, delivery, or throughput flowcondition in each of the Alberta design areas against the corresponding design capability. Consequently,design capability utilization is measured as Average Actual Flow / Seasonal Design Capability. Data usedin these reports lags the current date by at least one month.

Design Flow Capability utilization is a function of several factors that include:

Total market demand for Alberta natural gas. Seasonal changes in market demand for Alberta natural gas. Receipt nominating practices of customers individually and in aggregate to meet that level of demand. Scheduled maintenance which could effect actual flow requirement in a design area at any given time. Design assumptions used in determining required segment flow requirement.

Future Firm Transportation Service Availability

The Future Firm Transportation Service Availability report presents guidelines and timing for all futurefirm transportation service requests.

19

Calgary

Edmonton

Calgary

Edmonton

NGTL Design Areas

Upper Peace River

Central Peace River

Lower Peace River

Marten Hills

Edson Mainline

Rimbey-Nevis

Eastern Alberta Mainline (James River to Princess)

Western Alberta Mainline

North of Bens Lake

South of Bens Lake

Medicine Hat

South and Alderson

(Last updated Nov 2011)

Calgary

Edmonton

Calgary

Edmonton

NGTL Design Areas

Upper Peace River

Central Peace River

Lower Peace River

Marten Hills

Edson Mainline

Rimbey-Nevis

Eastern Alberta Mainline (James River to Princess)

Western Alberta Mainline

North of Bens Lake

South of Bens Lake

Medicine Hat

South and Alderson

(Last updated Nov 2011)

Eastern Alberta Mainline (PrincessTo Empress/McNeill)

20

21

Last Update May, 2018

Design Capability Utilization Actual Flow The amount of gas flowing within or out of the design area. Design Capability The volume of gas that can be transported from the design area on the pipeline system considering given design assumptions.

AVGLF (Average Load Factor) The ratio between average Actual Flow and Design Capability. It is calculated for every design season (summer/winter) as shown on the graphs.

Intra NGTL System Deliveries The amount of sales gas flowing off the system within an area. Receipt Flow Aggregate of actual receipts within an area and the Actual Flow of the upstream area.

Other System Load Factor The volume weighted average of the Average Load Factor (AVGLF) of all design areas on the system

DEFINITION OF TERMS

22