CIVIL PROCEDUREDean S. Mawis

L1. Rule 46

Mendoza vs. CA, G.R. No. 148505, February 20, 2007

Vital-Gozon 212 SCRA 235

LII. Rule 47

Anuran vs. Aquino, 38 Phil 29

Demetriou vs. CA, 238 SCRA 158

Arcelona vs. CA, G.R. No. 102900 October 2, 1997

Ancheta vs. Ancheta, G.R. No. 145370. March 4, 2004

Ramos vs. Combong, G.R. No. 144273, Oct. 20, 2005

Springfield Devt Corp. vs.Hon. Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 142628, Feb. 6, 2007

Intestate Estate of the Late Nimfa Sian vs. PNB, G.R. No. 168882, January 31, 2007

Llamas, et al. vs. The Honorable Court of Appeals, et al.,G.R. No. 149588, September 29, 2009.TECHNOLOGICAL ADVOCATES FOR AGRO-FOREST PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION, INC. (TAFPA, INC.), G.R. No. 165333, Feb. 10, 2010

Spouses Oscar Arcenas and Dolores Arcenas vs. Queen City Development Bank and Court of Appeals (Nineteenth Division), G.R. No. 166819, June 16, 2010.

LIII. Rules 48, 49, 50

LIV. Rule 51

Limkaichongvs. Comelec/Biraogovs. Nograles,etal./Paras vs. Nograles,etal./Villando vs. Comelec,etal.,G.R. Nos. 178831-32/G.R. No. 179120/G.R. Nos. 179132-33/G.R. Nos. 179240-41, July 30, 2009.Aklan College Inc. vs. Enero, G.R. No. 178309, Jan. 27, 2009

Go vs. CA, 100 SCRA 549

Natalia Realty vs. CA, G.R. No. 126462, Feb. 5, 2003

Pp vs. Cabalquinto, G.R. NO. 167693, Sept. 19, 2006

Mercury Drug vs. Home Development Fund, G.R. No. 171438, Dec. 19, 2007

Philippine Hawk Corporation vs. Vivian Tan Lee, G.R. No. 166869, February 16, 2010.

LV. Rule 53

Heirs of Montinola vs. CA and Samson, 158 SCRA 247

Navarro vs. CA, 204 SCRA 850

Cuenca vs. CA, 250 SCRA 485

LVI. Rule 56

A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC (Re: Proposed Rules on E-Filing)

A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC (Re: Proposed Rule for the Efficient Use of Paper)

Firestone Ceramics, Inc. vs. CA, 334 SCRA 465 (2000)

LVII. Rule 57

Davao Light vs. CA, 204 SCRA 343

Mangila vs. CA, 387 SCRA 15Magdalena Estate, Inc. v. Nieto, G.R. No. L-54242 November 25, 1983

Mindanao Savings & Loan Association, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 84481 April 18, 1989

Adlawan vs. Torres, 233 SCFRA 645

Phil. Bank Communications vs. CA, G.R. No. 115678, Feb. 23, 2001

Wee vs. Tankiansee, G.R. No. 171124, February 13, 2008

Foundation Specialist, Inc. vs. Betonval Ready Concrete, Inc., et al.,G.R. No. 170674, August 24, 2009.Leelin vs. Agro Devt, 121 SCRA 725

Towers vs. Ororama, 80 SCRA 262

Uy vs. CA, 215 SCRA 859

Olib v. Pastoral, G.R. No. 81120 August 20, 1990

LVIII. Rule 58

Administrative Circular No. 11-2000 Re ban on the Issuance of TRO or Writs of Prohibitory or Mandatory Injuction in cases involving government infrastructure projects (Nov. 13, 2000)

A.M. 07-7-12 SC (Amending Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65)

Paras vs. Roura, 163 SCRA 1

Federation of Land Reform Farmers of the Phils. Vs. CA, 246 SCRA 175

Dela Paz vs. Adiong, A.M. Nos. RTJ-04-1857, Nov. 23, 2004

Golden Gate Realty Corp. vs. IAC, G.R. No. 74289. July 31, 1987.

Miranda vs. SC, et al., G.R. No. 140130, Oct. 1999

Universal Motors vs. Judge Rojas, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1814, May 26, 2005

Los Banos Rural Bank vsa. Africa (384 SCRA 385)

First Global vs. San Agustin, 377 SCRA 341

Developers Group of Companies, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 219 SCRA 715)

BORROMEO VS. CA, G.R. 169846, 28 March 2008

Sps. Yap vs. International Exchange Bank, G.R. No. 175145, Mar. 28, 2008

G.G. SPORTSWEAR MFG CORP. vs. BANCO DE ORO, G.R. NO. 184434, FEB. 8, 2010

Sps. Lago vs. Judge Abul, A.M. No. RTJ-10-2255, January 17, 2011

Nerwin v PNOC, G.R. No. 167057, April 11, 2012

LIX. Rule 59

Normandy vs. Duque, 29 SCRA 385

Vivares vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 155408, February 13, 2008

Alcantara vs. Abbas, 9 SCRA 54

Dolar vs. Sundiam, 38 SCRA 616

Central Sawmill vs. Alto Surety, 27 SCRA 997

Descaller vs. CA, 224 SCRA 566

Ventosa vs. Fernan, 10 SCRA 59

Pacific Corp. vs. Surety Co., 73 SCRA 564

LX. Rule 60 (Replevin)

Bachrach Motor Company, Inc. vs. Summers, 42 Phil 3 [1921.]

Fernandez vs. International Corp. Bank, G.R. No. 131283, Oct. 7, 1999

Service Specialist vs. CA, 251 SCRA 70 (1995)

Chua vs. CA, 222 SCRA 85 (1993)

Stronghold Insurance vs. CA, 208 SCRA 336 (1992)

Smart Communications vs. Astorga, G.R. No. 148132, 28 January 28, 2008

Sebastian v. Valino, A.M. No. P-91-549, 5 July 1993

LXI. Rule 61 (Support Pendente Lite)

Baito v. Sarmiento, L-13105, August 25, 1960

Gan v. Reyes, G.R. No. 145527, May 28, 2002

Torres v. Teodoro, 101 Phil. 422 (1957)

San Juan vs. Valenzuela, 117 SCRA 926 (1982)

Vasco vs. CA, 81 SCRA 762 (1978)

Vinluan vs. CA, 24 SCRA 787 (1968)

Reyes vs. Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 (February 28, 1979.]

Calderon vs. Roxas, G.R. 185595, January 9, 2013

LXII. Rule 62 (Interpleader)

Mesina vs. IAC, 145 SCRA 497 (1986)

LXIII. Rule 63. Declaratory Relief

SANTOS vs. AQUINO, 94 Phil 65 (1953)

GOMEZ vs. PALOMAR, 25 SCRA 827 (1968)

Almeda vs. Bathala Marketing Ind., G.R. No. 105806, January 28,. 2008

LXIV. RULE 64

Chavez vs. Comelec, G.R. No. 162731-32, Apr. 13, 2004

Jumamil vs. Comelec, G.R. Nos. 167989-93, March 6, 2007

LXV. RULE 65

A.M. 07-7-12 SC (Amending Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65)

Certiorari

Tagle vs. Equitable PCI Bank, G.R. No. 172299, April 22, 2008Dacudao vs. Sec. of Justice, G.R. No. 188056, January 8, 2013FORTICH vs. CORONA, 289 SCRA 624DAUZ VS. ELIOSIDA, 1 SCRA 990 (1961)PNB vs. The Intestate Estate of Francisco de Guzman, G.R. No. 182507, June 16, 2010SANTOS, ET AL. vs. CA, 360 SCRA 521Calim vs. Hon. Jesus Guerero, G.R. No. 156527, Mar. 5, 2007

Gadnanan vs. Tubungan, G.R. No. 182185, September 18, 2009

prohibition

Yusay vs. CA, G.R. No. 156684, April 6, 2011

Mandamus

Endona vs. OMB, G.R. No. 174902-06, Feb. 15, 2008

Uy Kiao Eng v. Nixon Lee, G.R. No. 176831 January 15, 2010

Henares, Jr. vs. Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board, G.R. No. 158290, Oct. 23, 2006LXVI. Rule 66 QUO WARRANTO CASESCampos vs. Degamo, 6 SCRA 235 (1962)

SISON vs. PANGRAMUYEN, 84 SCRA 364 (1978)

MUN. OF SAN NARCISO vs. MENDEZ, 239 SCRA 11 (1994)

LXVII. RULE 67 EXPROPRIATION

THE CITY OF MANILA vs. THE ARELLANO LAW COLLEGES, INC., 85 SCRA 663 (1950)

Export Processing Zone Authority vs. Dulay, G.R. No. L-59603. April 29, 1987.

Robern Devt. Inc. vs. Judge Quitain, G.R. No. 135042, Sept. 23, 1999

Lintag vs. NPC, G.R. No. 158609, July 27, 2007

Republic vs. Phil-Ville Devt and Housing Corp.., G.R. No. 172243, June 26, 2007

Republic vs. Far East Enterprises, Inc., et al.,G.R. No. 176487, August 25, 2009.City of Iloilo vs. Hon. Besana, G.R. No. 168967, Feb. 12, 2010Apo Fruits Corporation, et al. vs. Land Bank of the Philippines. G.R. No.164195, October 12, 2010.

LXVIII. RULE 68 Foreclosure

1. Rehabilitation Finance vs. Alto Surety, INC., G.R. No. L-14303. March 24, 1960.]

2. TIGLAO vs. BOTONES, G.R. No. L-3619. October 29, 1951.]

3. GSIS, vs. CFI OF ILOILO BRANCH III, ILOILO CITY, [G.R. No. 45322. July 5, 1989.]

4. CRUZ vs. IAC, [G.R. No. 72806. January 9, 1989.]

5. SPS. KHO vs. CA, [G.R. No. L-83498. October 22, 1991.]

6. ROXAS vs. CA, [G.R. No. 100480. May 11, 1993.]

7. Monzon vs. Sps. Relova, G.R. No. 171827, Sept. 17, 2008

8. De Vera vs. Agloro, 448 SCRA 203

9. Sps. Arquiza vs. CA, G.R. No. 160479, June 8, 2005

LXIX. RULE 69

1. ROQUE vs. IAC, [G.R. No. L-75886. August 30, 1988.]

2. FABRICA vs. CA, [G.R. No. L-47360. December 15, 1986.]

3. AUSTRIA VS. LICHUACO, G.R. No. 170080, April 4, 2007

4. Carolina (Carlina) Vda. De Figuracion, et al. v. Emilia Figuracion-Gerilla; G.R. No. 151334. February 13, 2013LXX. RULE 70. FORCIBLE ENTRY

1. Calixtro vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 169047, Nov. 3, 2008

2. BEJAR vs. CALUAG, G.R. No. 171277, February 15, 2007

3. Del Rosario vs. Sps. Manuel, G.R. No. 1533652, January 16, 2004

4. BUENAVENTURA vs. UY, et al. , 149 SCRA 22 (1987)

5. JAVIER VS. VERIDIANO, 237 SCRA 565 (1994)

6. BAENS VS. CA, 125 SCRA 634 (1983)

7. AZCUNA, JR. vs. CA, 255 SCRA 215 (1996)

8. PENAS, JR. vs. CA, 233 SCRA 744 (1994)

9. LIM KEIH TONG vs. CA, 195 SCRA 398 (1991)

10. CLUTARIO vs. CA, 216 SCRA 341 (1992)

11. CURSINO vs. BAUTISTA, 176 SCRA 65 (1989)

12. ACAB vs. CA, 241 SCRA 546 (1995)

13. PERAN vs. PRESIDING JUDGE, 125 SCRA 78 (1983)

14. ONCE vs. GONZALES, 76 SCRA 258 (1977)

15. RACAZA vs. SUSANA REALTY, 18 SCRA 1172 (1966)

16. SAN MANUEL WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., vs. JUDGE TUPAS 249 SCRA 466 (1995)

17. Vda. de Ampil vs. Alvendia, 10 SCRA 828 (1964)

18. CITY OF MANILA vs. CA, 149 SCRA 183 (1987)

19. SAN PEDRO vs. CA, 235 SCRA 145 (1994)

20. Sunflower Neighborhood Association vs. CA, G.R. No. 136274, Sept. 3, 2003

21. Floyd vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 169047, November 3, 2008 (on trespassers. Compare with sunflower)

22. Pagtalunan vs. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. 147695, September 13, 2007

LXXI. RULE 71. CONTEMPT1. Pp vs. Godoy, G.R. No. 115908-09, Mar. 29, 1995

2. ANG vs. CASTRO, [G.R. No. L-66371. May 15, 1985.]

3. Pp vs. TORIO, [G.R. No. L-27152. November 2, 1982.

4. PASCUA vs. SIMEON, 161 SCRA 1

5. Tacardon vs. Ang, G.R. 159286, Apr. 5, 2005

6. Regalado vs. Go, G.R. No. 167988, February 6, 2007

7. Judge D. Espaol vs. Atty. Benjamin Formoso, G.R. No. 150949, June 21, 2007

8. Arriola vs. Arriola, G.R. No. 177703, Jan. 28, 2008

9. Rodriguez vs. Blancaflor, G.R. No. 190171, March 14, 2011.