24
1 Survival, Coexistence, and Autonomy: Yezidi Political Identity after Genocide Güneş Murat Tezcür, Zeynep Kaya, Bayar Mustafa Sevdeen Introduction In contemporary Yezidi discourse, violence has a cyclical character, in contrast to interpretations of history that posit the progressively declining role of violence in human affairs. 1 A sense of historical victimhood is central to the formation of Yezidis communal identity whose very survival was at stake in different time periods. Accordingly, the IS attacks in 2014 were perceived as the latest in a series of atrocities Yezidis experienced since the medieval times. The attacks are called “the 74rd firman” implying continuity with previous episodes of mass scale violence targeting the community. While the IS attacks involving mass executions and enslavement shocked the conscience of the international community, for Yezidis, the tragedy of August 2014 was not unprecedented in terms of its harm. In the words of a Yezidi leader, “[In 1832], [t]hey took away a thousand of our girls. A thousand was plenty. Our population was much smaller by that …You now see lots of [Sunni] Kurds around. Their fourth or fifth generation ancestors were Yezidis.” 2 In his eyes, Yezidis have historically been targeted because of their religious beliefs and subject to sexual violence and forced conversions. The main difference between the past massacres and the current one was the widespread publicity characterizing the IS violence that triggered an international humanitarian intervention, which was in fact unprecedented. This prevailing discourse of victimhood implies that Yezidis were subject to violent campaigns primarily due to their religious identity. In fact, Orthodox Islamic perspectives define Yazidis as polytheists or unbelievers and do not treat them as “People of the Book,” unlike Christians and Jews who are entitled to certain rights and a limited degree of autonomy in their internal affairs. This liminal status, similar to the experience of other religious groups that emerged after the rise of Islam such as Alevis, Kakais, and Bahais, put Yezidis in a precarious position and more vulnerable to violence justified on religious

Survival, Coexistence, and Autonomy: Yezidi Political Identity after … and Identity... · 2020. 5. 6. · Yezidis as an affront to the Muslim God, suggests that the community remained

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    Survival,Coexistence,andAutonomy:

    YezidiPoliticalIdentityafterGenocideGüneşMuratTezcür,ZeynepKaya,BayarMustafaSevdeen

    Introduction

    IncontemporaryYezididiscourse,violencehasacyclicalcharacter,incontrastto

    interpretationsofhistorythatposittheprogressivelydecliningroleofviolenceinhuman

    affairs.1AsenseofhistoricalvictimhoodiscentraltotheformationofYezidiscommunal

    identitywhoseverysurvivalwasatstakeindifferenttimeperiods.Accordingly,theIS

    attacksin2014wereperceivedasthelatestinaseriesofatrocitiesYezidisexperienced

    sincethemedievaltimes.Theattacksarecalled“the74rdfirman”implyingcontinuitywith

    previousepisodesofmassscaleviolencetargetingthecommunity.WhiletheISattacks

    involvingmassexecutionsandenslavementshockedtheconscienceoftheinternational

    community,forYezidis,thetragedyofAugust2014wasnotunprecedentedintermsofits

    harm.InthewordsofaYezidileader,“[In1832],[t]heytookawayathousandofourgirls.A

    thousandwasplenty.Ourpopulationwasmuchsmallerbythat…Younowseelotsof

    [Sunni]Kurdsaround.TheirfourthorfifthgenerationancestorswereYezidis.”2Inhiseyes,

    Yezidishavehistoricallybeentargetedbecauseoftheirreligiousbeliefsandsubjectto

    sexualviolenceandforcedconversions.Themaindifferencebetweenthepastmassacres

    andthecurrentonewasthewidespreadpublicitycharacterizingtheISviolencethat

    triggeredaninternationalhumanitarianintervention,whichwasinfactunprecedented.

    ThisprevailingdiscourseofvictimhoodimpliesthatYezidisweresubjecttoviolent

    campaignsprimarilyduetotheirreligiousidentity.Infact,OrthodoxIslamicperspectives

    defineYazidisaspolytheistsorunbelieversanddonottreatthemas“PeopleoftheBook,”

    unlikeChristiansandJewswhoareentitledtocertainrightsandalimiteddegreeof

    autonomyintheirinternalaffairs.Thisliminalstatus,similartotheexperienceofother

    religiousgroupsthatemergedaftertheriseofIslamsuchasAlevis,Kakais,andBahais,put

    Yezidisinaprecariouspositionandmorevulnerabletoviolencejustifiedonreligious

  • 2

    groundsovercenturiesfromthefatwasoftheleadingOttomanjuristEbu's-suudinthe

    16thcenturytotheISinthe21stcentury.Fromthisperspective,theveryexistenceof

    Yezidisasanon-Islamicgrouphasbeenasourceofmajorsecurityconcernandreligious

    challengetothepoliticalorderinMuslimsocieties.Whiletheriseofpoliticalsecularism

    withtheformationoftheIraqinationalstateprovidedasemblanceofstabilityforYezidis,

    thepost-2003periodwascharacterizedbythecollapseofthestateauthorityandviolent

    sectarianismsignifiedthereturnofreligiousviolencetargetingYezidisquaYezidis.

    ThischaptersuggeststhattheISattacksof2014,whichexhibitscertainsimilarities

    withthepastviolence,hashaduniqueimplicationsforYezidis.Thecontemporaryformsof

    Yezidiidentityexhibittwodistinctivecharacteristicsinthepost-genocidalera.First,

    Yezidishavegainedunprecedentedrecognitionandinterestintheinternationalarena.

    WhileYezidishadalonghistoryofcontactswithWesterndiplomats,scholars,and

    travelersgoingbacktothefirsthalfofthe19thcentury,thecommunityasthevictimsof

    religiousintoleranceandpersecutionbroughtthecommunityundergloballimelightinthe

    post-2014period.Inparticular,captiveYezidiwomensubjecttoextremeformsofsexual

    violencehavecometoembodytheexperienceofthecommunity.Thisgenderedexperience

    facilitatedacontextforYezidiwomentoexpresstheirperspectivesandbecomevocal

    voices,suchasNadiaMurad,tocommunicatetheexperiencesoftheYazidistothe

    internationalcommunityandmakepoliticaldemands.Giventhelonghistoryofentrenched

    patriarchalpracticesinthecommunity,theincreasedvisibilityofYazidiwomenandtheir

    increasedengagementwithissuesthataffecttheircommunityrepresentsaparadoxical

    outcomeoftheISviolence.

    Next,themassivedisplacementsufferedbythecommunitycontributedtothe

    fragmentednatureofYezidipolitics.Thisprocessoffragmentationhastakenplaceattwo

    parallellevels.Ontheonehand,Yezidisaresubjecttotheauthorityofanincreasing

    numberofpoliticalactorswithopposingagendas.ThefailureandinabilityoftheKurdish

    militaryforcestoprotecttheSinjarareaagainsttheISonslaughtinearlyAugust2014

    generatedsentimentsofdisillusionmentandresentmentamonglargesectionsoftheYezidi

    community.ThisdevelopmentdrewawedgebetweentheYezidisandSunniKurdsdespite

    theircommonlinguisticcharacteristics.EveniftheKurdistanRegionalGovernment(KRG)

    pursuesapolicyofco-optationandsymbolicempowermenttowardstheYezidis,the

  • 3

    debacleofAugust2014hashadastrongnegativeimpactoverthepopularappealofa

    hyphenatedidentityof“Yezidi-Kurds.”Meanwhile,theriseofthePKKasasignificant

    militaryforceintheSinjarareaandthecaptureofmostpartsoftheSinjarbytheIraqi

    governmentandShiitemilitiasledtotheproliferationofpoliticalforces.Ontheotherhand,

    therehasbeenanotableincreaseinthenumberofYezidiswhoclaimtospeakonbehalfof

    thecommunityandpursuedifferentgoalsbothinIraqandWesterncountries.Ironically,

    therelativedemographicandpoliticalweaknessoftheYezidicommunityhascontributed

    toitspoliticalfragmentation,asdifferentYezidisseekthesupportofavarietyoflocaland

    internationalentities.

    ThechapterfirstoffersahistoricaloverviewoftheYezidis’interactionswithlocal

    andimperialrulerssincetheriseofthecommunitywithitsdistinctivereligiousbelief

    systembythe13thcentury.YezidisalwaysremainedoutsiderstotheOttomanmillet

    systemofferinglimitedtoleranceandautonomytonon-IslamicgroupssuchasChristians

    andJews.Atthesametime,large-scalemilitarycampaignstargetingYezidiswerenot

    exclusivelyorprimarilyreligiouslymotivated.TheOttomanpashasledmanyexpeditions

    againstMt.SinjarinhabitedbyseveralYeziditribesprimarilyinordertoprotectthe

    caravanrouteslinkingnorthernSyriaandsoutheasternAnatoliawithMesopotamia.With

    theadventofthe19thcentury,YezidisbecametargetsofOttomancentralizationefforts

    aimingattaxcollectionandconscriptionthatcontinuedaftertheestablishmentoftheIraqi

    stateinthe1920s.NextisanarrativeoftheviolenceexperiencedbytheYezidisinthepost-

    2003era.ThegeneralatmosphereofsectarianinsecurityandriseofradicalIslamist

    groupshavemadeYezidismoredependentontheKRGthatperceivedtheYezidi

    communityasanimportantleverageinitsclaimsoverdisputedterritoriesintheprovince

    ofNineveh.However,theISblitzkriegin2014underminedthisdependencyandexposed

    thevulnerabilityofYezidislackingadefenseforceoftheirown.Theremainingsectionsof

    thechapterfocusesontheriseofanethnoreligiousnationalidentityinintersectionwith

    genderidentityamongYezidisamidpoliticalfragmentationinthepost-genocidalperiod.

    ThechapterconcludeswithabriefreflectiononthefutureevolutionofYezidipolitics.

  • 4

    ALiminalExistence:YezidisundertheOttomans

    Yezidism,primarilyasetofbeliefsandpracticestransmittedorallyacrossgenerations,has

    aninherenttendencytodefyorthodoxyassociatedwithreligionswithahistoryof

    extensiverecords.AseloquentlyarticulatedbyPhilipKreyenbroek,nodogmaticand

    officialformofthefaithexists.ThepursuitofdefiningYezidismaccordinganauthoritative

    andcanonicaltextualsourceoverlooksoraltraditionscentraltoitslivedexperience.3

    UnlikeMandeanswhoclaimedtohavesacredbooksoftheirown,probablytoescape

    persecutioninthehandsofpowerfulMuslimrulers,Yezidiwenttolenghtstohidetheir

    purportedbooksfromoutsiders.4Nonetheless,theattempttoidentifythetextualoriginsof

    YezidismhasbeenamajoroccupationofbothWesternandMuslimtravelers,scholars,and

    intellectualswhooftenperceivedthecommunityasanexoticgroupwithstrangeand

    arcanecustomsforanextendedperiodtime.5Inparticular,thewidespreadusageofthe

    epithetof“devil-worshippers,”whichconflatesthesacredstatusofPeacockAngelfor

    YezidisasanaffronttotheMuslimGod,suggeststhatthecommunityremainedillegiblefor

    outsideobserversforcenturies.6

    TheYezidisremainedanillegiblecommunityintheeyesofOttomanrulerswho

    establishedtheirdominanceoverterritoriesinhabitedbyYazidisintheearly16thcentury.

    Atthesametimefarfrombeingdefenselessandhelplesssubjects,Yezidiswere

    autonomouspoliticalactorswithsignificantcapacityforcoalition-building,negotiation,

    andresistance.TherearenumerousrecordsofYeziditribalchiefsbeingappointedaslocal

    OttomanrulersandengaginginallianceswithoragainstSunnitribalchiefs.7The

    communitypresentedtwooverlappingbutdistinctchallengestotheOttomanorder.First,

    OttomanrulersperceivedMt.Sinjar,anaridandnarrowmountainrangewithcommanding

    viewsofthetraderoutesbetweenBaghdadandMosul,inthesoutheast,andAleppo,

    Diyarbakir,Mardininthenorthwest,asabastionofinsecurityandbanditry.8They

    organizedaseriesofpunitiveexpeditionsagainstYeziditribeswhoengagedinraids

    targetingcaravans.Forinstance,EvliyaÇelebi,therenownedOttomantraveler,wasan

    observerinsuchanexpeditionin1655.HedescribedYezidisofSinjaras“wildsavages,

    rebellious,ghoulfaced,hairyinfidels”whoworshipedablackdog.9Healsonarratesa

  • 5

    previousexpeditionbytherulerofDiyarbakirin1640resultedinmassacresand

    enslavementofthousandsofYezidis.10

    EvliyaÇelebi’sdehumanizationofYezidiswasnotuntypicalandpointedouttoa

    seconddynamiccharacterizingtheOttoman-Yezidirelations.Yezidiswiththeir

    “illegitimate”beliefsystemremainedoutsideoftheOttomanmoralorder.Evenifthe

    campaignsagainstMt.Sinjarwereoftenmotivatedbysecurityconcerns(i.e.,securingthe

    caravanroutesandrecoveringstolengoods),largescaleandindiscriminateviolence

    againstYezidiswerejustifiedonreligiousgrounds.11Inthisregard,itispossibletodraw

    parallelsbetweentheOttomanstate’perceptionofSinjarandtheOttomanandlater

    Turkishstate’sperceptionsofDersimineasternAnatolia.12Usingtheconceptdeveloped

    byJamesScott,thesetwomountainrangeswiththeirnaturaldefensesagainstinvading

    forcescanbedescribedasstatelesszoneswithalonghistoryofindigenouspeopleresisting

    orfleeingstateauthorities,YezidisinSinjarandZazakispeakingAlevisinDersim.13Inboth

    cases,thestateauthoritiesperceivedastheseregionsasastatelesszoneinhabitedbya

    groupwhose“deviant”religiousbeliefsfosterdisloyaltyandmakethempotentially

    rebellious.14

    ThehistoryofOttoman-YezidiinteractionsduringthelastcenturyoftheEmpire

    demonstratesseveraltendenciesshapingtheimperialpoliciesandpriorities.Theadvent

    Ottomanmodernizationofthe19thcenturyinvolvedtheimpositionofconscription,

    improvementsintaxcollection,andprojectionofcentralstateauthorityintoremote

    cornersoftheempire.Meanwhile,theRusso-Turkishwars,especiallytheconflictin1877,

    resultedinthousandsofYezidibeingsubjectsoftheRussianEmpire.15The1830sand

    1840ssawaseriesofcampaignsagainstSinjarthatremainedageopoliticallyimportant

    areacontrollingthelineofcommunicationbetweenDiyarbakirandMosul.16Apermanent

    TurkishgarrisoninthemoreaccessiblesouthernSinjarwasestablishedonlyafter1849.17

    Atthesametime,theOttomanswerelesssuccessfulinconscriptingYezidis.18Afterthe

    powerfulBritishAmbassadorintheOttomancapitalintervenedontheirbehalf,Yezidisof

    SheikhanandSinjarwereabletoobtainanexemptionin1850.19Inapetitionsubmittedto

    theOttomanauthoritiesandrepresentativesofEuropeanpowers,Yezidileadersdemanded

    exemptionfromobligatorymilitaryserviceonreligiousgrounds.Thiswasthefirsttime

    Yezidispresentedastylizedversionoftheirbeliefsystemstotheoutsideworldinawritten

  • 6

    document.EveniftheOttomanstatecontinuedtotreatYezidisasaliminalminoritynot

    qualifiedtobeincludedinthemilletsystem,italsoshowedflexibilityandacceptedthat

    YezidismadeapaymentinlieuofservingintheOttomanarmy.

    ReligiousconsiderationsbecamemorecentraltohowtheOttomanstatedealtwith

    theYezidisduringthereignofAbdülhamidII.Theprojectofmakingloyalsubjectsoutof

    Yezidisinvolvedsystematicattemptsattheirconversionatatimewhenincreasing

    presenceofforeignrepresentationsandmissionariesintheeasternprovincesaggravated

    thethreatperceptionoftheOttomanstate.TheconscriptionofYezidiswouldfacilitate

    theirIslamization,andmakethemimmunetotheappealofforeigninfluences,andensure

    theirloyaltytotheOttomanorder.AnOttomanPashaentrustedwiththetaskofdealing

    withthe“Yezidiquestion”whoarrivedinMosulin1892engagedinacampaignofterror

    anddestructionthatultimatelybackfired.HundredsofYezidiswerekilled,theLalish,the

    spiritualcenterofYezidis,wasconvertedtoamadrasa,sacredreligiousobjectswere

    confiscated,mosqueswerebuiltinYezidivillages,leadingfiguresofthecommunitywere

    forcedtoconvert.20WhenthewordofthesecoercivepracticesreachedtheOttoman

    capital,thepashawasdismissed.Apparently,theOttomanstatedidnotapprovepasha’s

    brutalmethodsthatsowdisorderandinsecurityintheregionandrecognizedthelimitsof

    violenceinachievingmassconversion.21TheremainingdecadesoftheOttomaneradidnot

    seeanylargeanti-YezidiviolenceexceptforbriefexpeditionsagainstSinjarduringWorld

    WarI.Overall,thishistoricaloverviewoffersanuancedpictureofYezidivictimhoodunder

    theOttomans.WhilereligiousviolenceagainstYezidis,aheterodoxgroupexcludedfrom

    thelegitimateOttomanintercommunalsystem,becamesalientincertaintimeperiods,the

    communitydevelopedastrongsenseofpoliticalautonomyandoftenachievedsignificant

    concessionsviaresistanceornegotiations.

    IntheCrossfire:TheFormationofYezidiPoliticalIdentityinPost-2003Iraq

    DuringtheMosuldisputebetweenthenascentTurkishRepublicandtheBritishcontrolled

    Iraq,mostYezidileaderspreferredIraqunderaEuropeanmandateoveraTurkishorArab

    government.22Nonetheless,YezidisremainedonthemarginsofthenewlyestablishedIraqi

    state.Conscriptioncontinuedtobeamajorconcernforthecommunityandtriggeredsmall

    scaleactsofrebellioninSinjar,whichgainedanewgeopoliticalimportanceasaborder

  • 7

    zonebetweenSyriaandIraq.23Ironically,themarginalpoliticalinfluenceofYezidiscould

    beamajorreasonfortheabsenceoflarge-scaleviolencetargetingthecommunityinIraq

    duringthe20thcentury.24Nonetheless,therisingappealofKurdishnationalismamong

    Yezidisstartingwiththeearly1960sledtorepressivepoliciesbytheBaghdad

    governments.25TherulingBa’thregimeinitiatedasystematiccampaignofresettlement

    andArabizationtargetingtheSinjarregion.26Yezidisofthemountainvillageswereforced

    torelocateto11collectivesettlementssurroundedbyArabvillagesreceivingpreferential

    treatment.27Inthe1980s,asignificantnumberofYezidisservedintheIraqiarmyandlost

    theirlivesinthewarwithIran.Intheearly1990s,theestablishmentofaninternationally

    enforcedno-flyzoneandtheformationofdefactoKurdishautonomysawthepartitionof

    YezidilandsbetweenBaghdadandErbil.WhiletheSinjarareaandsouthernSheikhan

    remainedundertheIraqirule,YezidicommunitiesinDohuk,otherpartsofSheikhan

    district,andtheLalishtemplefallundertheKurdishcontrol.

    Inthepost-2003order,YezidisbecameacrucialdemographicbloctoKRG’sclaims

    overdisputedterritoriesanditspowerpoliticsintheNinevehprovince,oneofthemost

    contestedareasintheentirecountry.Inthe2005referendumonthenewIraqi

    constitution,around55percentofthevoterssaidnointheNinevehprovincethatalso

    includesSinjar.Thiswasstillshortofthetwo-thirdsofthevotethatwouldresultinthe

    defeatofthenewconstitution.28SincetheKurdswerethemainbeneficiariesofthenew

    constitutionalorder,obtainingtheYezidisupportinNinevehwasessentialtotheirpolitical

    goals.Article2oftheconstitutiondraftedin2006andpassedintheKRGparliamentin

    2009includedSinjaraspartofIraqiKurdistan.Yezidis,whoweresubjecttoArabization

    policiesduringtheSaddamera,alsobenefitedfromtheKurdishpatronage.Forthefirst

    time,SinjardistricthadaYezidigovernor.SomeYezidisjoinedtheIraqiarmyor

    PeshmergaandworkedastranslatorsfortheUSarmy.OtherYezidisfoundemployment

    opportunitiesinDohukandErbilandbenefitedfromtheKurdisheconomicboomthat

    lasteduntil2014.29ThesedevelopmentsgeneratedsomeresentmentamongtheSunni

    ArabsandTurkomansintheareawholosttheirprivilegedpositionsandincreasingly

    perceivedtheYezidisasbeingpartoftheKurdishpowerstructure.30Atthesametime,a

    significantnumberofYezidiswereuncomfortablewiththerisingethnictensionsand

    KurdishexclusionandrepressionofYezidispoliticalactivismespousinganindependent

  • 8

    communalidentity.Theywerefearfulthattheircommunitywasbecomingpawnsinthe

    Kurdish-ArabterritorialstruggleandcharacterizedtheKRGpoliciesas“Kurdification”of

    Sinjar.31

    LikeotherreligiousminoritiesinIraq,thefalloftheSaddamregimein2003

    generatedanatmospherethatwashighlydangerousforYezidis.Asearlyas2004,targeted

    killingsofYezidisbecauseoftheirreligiousidentitystartedtoproliferate.32Itbecame

    increasinglydangerousforYezidistogetservices,workorstudyatMosul,whichemerged

    asahotbedofSunnimilitantgroups.33Theself-proclaimedIslamicStateofIraq(ISI)

    imposedasiegeonthedeliveryoffood,fuel,andconstructionmaterialstoSinjarasit

    consideredYezidisunbelievers.34AfteraYezidigirlwasstonedtodeathherrelativesand

    communityforallegedlyhavinganaffairwithaSunnimaninApril2007,theISIurgedits

    followerstokillYezidiswherevertheyfindthem.Twoweekslater,armedmenstoppeda

    bus,checkedpassengers’identificationdocuments,andorderednon-Yezidisoffthebus.

    ThentheydrovethehijackedbustoMosulandexecuted23Yezidisthere.35Themostlethal

    terroristattackinpost-2003Iraq,suicidebombingsinAl-Qahtaniya(Girzerik)andAl-

    Jazeera(SibaSheikhXidir)collectivetownsinhabitedbyYezidis,killedseveralhundredsof

    peopleonAugust14,2007.36

    ThesedevelopmentsmadeYezidisofSinjarmoredependentontheKurdish

    authoritiesfortheirsecuritywhoincreasedtheircontroloftheareaespeciallyafterthe

    2007bombings.Between2005and2009,Kurdishpartiesincreasedtheirvoteshareatthe

    expenseofautonomousYezidipartiesinSinjar.WhiletheKurdishAlliancereceived44,224

    votes(approximately60percentofthevalidvotes),theYezidiMovementforReformand

    Progressreceived17,055votes(app.22percent)intheSinjardistrictandQahtaniya

    subdistrictintheDecember2005parliamentaryelections.37Incomparison,theKurdish

    alliancereceived101,606votes(app.78percent)whiletwoautonomousYezidiparties

    receivedonly7,787votes(app.6percent)intheJanuary2009provincialelections.38By

    thattime,theYezidisupportfortheKurdishpoliticalgoalsinNinevehbecameevenmore

    importantastheSunniArabsnowstartedtoactivelyparticipateintheelectoralpolitics.

    Atthesametime,theKRGauthoritiesdonotrecognizeYezidisasadistinct

    ethnoreligiousgroupbutasethnicKurdswithdistinctreligiousbeliefs.IntheeyesofKRG

    leaders,Yezidismisthe“originalKurdishreligion”thatsetKurdshistoricallyapartfrom

  • 9

    Arabs,Persians,andTurks,theirMuslimneighborsMuslimpopulations.Inthisregard,

    YezidismwasincorporatedintotheKurdishnationalistdiscourse.39Article6ofthedraft

    KRGconstitutionexplicitlymentionsonlyTurkomans,Chaldeans,Assyrians,Armenians,

    andArabsasdistinctnationalgroups.Article7statesthattheIslamiclawisoneofthe

    sourcesoflegislationwhileindicatingtherightsandfreedomsofChristiansandYezidisand

    otherreligionsaretobeprotected.40TheKRGparliamenthas111seatswith11ofthese

    seatsreservedforChaldeans,Assyrians,Armenians,andTurkomansandnoneforYezidis.41

    Insummary,thefalloftheSaddamregimehadamixedblessingfortheYezidis.On

    theonehand,therewasanimprovementinthematerialwell-beingoftheYezidisinthe

    post-2003era.SomeYezidis,especiallytheonesservingintheIraqiarmyorworkingfor

    theU.S.army,improvedtheireconomicsituation,builtthemselveshousesandpurchased

    cars.42Moreover,YezidisaffiliatedwiththeKDP,thedominantpartyintheKRG,gained

    accesstogreaterpoliticalpatronageandresources.Ontheotherhand,theriseofsectarian

    extremismmadethesituationofYezidis,ahistoricallymarginalizedcommunity,evenmore

    precarious.Theyweredisproportionatelytargetedbyextremistgroupsandbecame

    increasinglydependentontheKurdishPeshmergafortheirverysurvival.Besides,the

    KRG’sattemptstoreconstructYezidiidentitybyemphasizingitscommonlinkageswith

    KurdishnessgeneratedsomebacklashamongYezidisofSinjarwhowerefearfulthat

    increasingethnicconflictoverdisputedterritoriesinNinevehwouldresultintheir

    scapegoating.

    AnEthnoreligiousNationalIdentity?

    IntheearlyhoursofAugust3,2014,theso-calledIslamicState(IS),whichalready

    capturedMosulandthesurroundingareasinlessthantwomonthsago,stageda

    coordinatedattackagainsttheSinjarregion.AstheKurdishforceswithdrewinpanic,theIS

    quicklyoverrunanyfeebledefenseshowninYezidicollectivetowns.Duringthiscampaign,

    atleast1,500Yazidiswereexecutedwhilealmost1,500diedonMt.Sinjarfrom

    dehydrationorstarvation.43Around6,400Yazidis,mostlywomenandchildren,were

    kidnapped.Manyofthemweresubsequentlysoldas“slaves”byIS.44Womenwereraped

    repeatedly;childrenwereforcedtoconvertandbrainwashedtoserveassoldiersfortheIS.

    AlthoughotherreligiousminoritygroupsinnorthernIraqwerealsotargetedbyIS,the

  • 10

    scaleofanti-Yazidiviolencewasunparalleled.Testimoniesbysurvivorssuggestthatmany

    localMuslims,includingformerfriends,“bloodbrothers,”andgodfathersofYezidichildren,

    tookanactivepartinthekillingsandkidnappings.Accordingly,mostkillingsand

    kidnappingstookplaceintownssuchasSibaSheikXidir,Girzerik,andKochothatwere

    closetoArabsettlements.45Yezidisinthenorthernpartofthemountainhadmoretimeto

    takerefugeinMt.Sinjar.46TheIScontroloftheSinjarcitycenterendedinNovember2015;

    theentireSinjardistrictwasliberatedbyspring2017.Yetthescopeofdestruction,

    poisonedintercommunalrelations,andprevailingpoliticalinstabilityhaveprevented

    reconstructionefforts.Fiveyearsaftertheattacks,mostYezidisofSinjareitherstayedin

    IDPcampsinIraqiKurdistanorsoughtrefugeinWesterncountries.47

    ThiscatastrophicdevelopmenthadamonumentalimpactonYezidipoliticalidentity

    andhadthreespecificconsequences.First,forthefirsttimeintheirhistory,Yezidis

    emergedasapoliticalcommunityattractingsignificantinternationalinterestandconcern.

    TheObamaAdministration’sdecisiontoauthorizeairstrikesagainsttheISwastriggered

    bythehumantragedyexperiencedbytheYezidisstrandedonMt.Sinjar.48International

    organizationsincludingtheUnitedNationsdescribedtheanti-Yezidiattacksasgenocide.49

    AYezidisurvivorwoman,NadiaMurad,becametheco-recipientoftheNobelPeacePrizein

    2018forherglobalactivismagainstsexualviolenceinwar.TheGermanfederalstateof

    BadenWürttemberginitiatedahumanitarianadmissionprogramspecificallyforYezidi

    womensurvivorsandtheirchildren(butnotnecessarilyadultmalemembersoftheir

    family).50Whileitwouldtakesomeyearstofullyassessitseffects,thisglobalspreadofthe

    communityledtothediversificationandinternationalizationofYezidiactivismwiththe

    formationofvariousassociationsbyYezidisbasedinWesterncountries.51Withsupport

    fromvariousinternationalactors,theseassociationshavemadetwocoredemands

    influencedbypoliticalliberalismandtransitionaljusticediscourses:(a)therecognitionof

    theISattacksagainstYezidisasgenocideand(b)theformationofinternationaltribuneto

    tryandconvictindividualswhoparticipatedintheseattacks.ThefactthattheInternational

    CriminalCourt(ICC)doesnothaveautomaticjurisdictionoverIraqandSyria,whichare

    notpartoftheRometreatyof2002thatcreatedtheICC,complicatedtheseefforts.52The

    capturedISmilitantsweretriedinIraqicourtswheremanyofwhomfoundguiltyand

    sentencedtodeath.ThousandsofISfightersfrommanydifferentcountriesweredetained

  • 11

    byPYDforcesinnorthernSyriaaftertheliberationofthelastpieceoflandheldbytheISin

    March2019.YetnotasingleISmemberwasputontrialforcrimesspecificallycommitted

    againstYezidipeople.53

    AnotherimportantconsequenceoftheISattacksonYezidipoliticalidentityisthe

    strainedlinksbetweenYezidisandtheKRG.Asindicatedbefore,theKRGestablished

    politicalandmilitarycontroloverYezidiinhabitedterritoriesandextensivepatronage

    networksincorporatingalargenumberofYezidisbetween2003and2014.Howeverthe

    panickedwithdrawaloftheKurdishforcesfromSinjarinAugust2014wasamajor

    disappointment.WhilesomeYezidisarguedthattheKurdishforceslackedthecapacityto

    resistagainsttheISonslaught,manyothersportrayedthewithdrawalasanactofbetrayal

    demonstratingthedispensabilityofYezidisfortheKurdishleadership.54Inresponse,the

    KRGauthoritiesundertookseveralinitiativesincludingtheestablishmentofanoffice

    responsibleforrescuingYezidiskidnappedbytheISanddiplomaticeffortsaimingtohave

    theanti-Yezidiattacksrecognizedasgenocide.55Thetermgenocideevokesastrong

    emotionalandpoliticalmeaningsforIraqiKurdsgiventhelegacyofSaddamHussein’s

    Anfalcampaigninvolvingchemicalweaponsattacks,massacres,sexualviolence,andmass

    deportationagainstKurdishpeopleinthelate1980s.ThedescriptionofAnfalasgenocide

    hasbeencentraltothelegitimacyofKurdishpursuitofstatehoodandindependencefrom

    Iraq.56BylabellingtheISviolenceagainsttheYezidisasanothergenocidevictimizing

    ethnicKurds,theKurdishauthoritiessoughtinternationalsupportfortheformationofan

    independentKurdistanwherereligiousminoritieswouldbesafefromextremistviolence.

    TheKRGauthoritiesorganizedpollingstationsinIDPcampsandstronglyurgedYezidis

    displacedfromSinjartovoteinthereferendum.57Inthisregard,therecognitionofYezidi

    victimhoodhasbeenmadecentraltoKurdishvictimhoodandpursuitofindependence.At

    thesametime,thefailureofKurdishforcestoprotectYezidisfostereddemandsforthe

    formationofanautonomousregionforreligiousminoritiesinNinevehunderinternational

    supervision.Forinstance,Yazda,oneofthemostwell-knownYezidihumanitarianand

    lobbyingorganizations,explicitlycallsforsuchautonomy.58Similardemandswerealsoput

    forwardbyvariousChristiangroups.59

    AfinaltransformationfollowingtheISattacksconcernstheendoftheKRGcontrol

    overSinjar.WhiletheKRGforcesgainedbackpartsofSinjarfromtheIS,theywithdrew

  • 12

    completelyfromtheareainthefaceoftheIraqiandShiitemilitiaadvancesinOctober

    2017.Asaresult,forthefirsttime,aShiitepoliticalforceassertedmilitarysupremacyover

    YezidislandsandaimedtocultivateitsownpatronagenetworksamongYezidisbytaking

    advantageofintra-Yezididivisions.60Besides,thePKK,aKurdishnationalistforcewitha

    historyofrivalrywiththeKDP,madesignificantinroadsamongYezidisinthepost-2014

    period.61Duringtheattacks,thePKKmilitantsplayedahighlyvisibleroleinopeningupa

    humanitariancorridorbetweenMt.SinjarandtheSyrianbordercontrolledbythePYD,a

    PKKaffiliate.ThiscorridorenableddesperateYezidiswhotookrefugeinMt.Sinjartoreach

    safety.ThePKKestablishedapermanentpresenceintheareaandsuccessfullyrecruiteda

    significantnumberofYezidimenandwomen,whoweredisenchantedwiththeKDP,toits

    militia.62LiketheKDP,thePKKalsoemphasizesKurdishnessofYezidis,butoffersadistinct

    ideologicalalternative.Inparticular,thePKKwithitssecular,equalitarian,andgender

    progressiveplatformspresenteditselfasavehicleofempowermentforYezidiwomen

    subjecttoextremelevelsofsexualviolenceandpatriarchalpractices.63Moreover,thePYD

    forcesrescuedmanykidnappedYezidiwomenandchildrenfromtheIScaptivityin

    northeasternSyria.Buildingonablueprintthatwasimplementedsuccessfullyinnorthern

    Syria(andunsuccessfullyinKurdishareasofTurkey),thePKKdeclared“democratic

    autonomy”forSinjarandsoughtinternationalsupport.TheriseofthePKKasaviableforce

    vyingforsupportamongYezidiscontributestofurtherfragmentationofYezidipolitical

    identityandcomplicatestheformationofaunifiedstanceamongYezidiswhoaremore

    spreadoutthaneverbefore.

    Gender&PoliticsamongtheYezidis

    IS’sattacksagainsttheYezidisrevealedonceagainthecentralityofgenderinpolitical

    violence.Indeed,sexualviolencehasbeenusedasadeliberateandsystematictoolto

    commitgenocideandethniccleansingagainstreligiousandethniccommunitiesinmany

    othercontextsinrecentdecadesaswell,suchasinBosnia,Kosovo,Rwanda,Sudan,Uganda

    andtheDRC.64GroupssuchasISusespecific,typicallypatriarchal,gendernormsin

    intersectionwithidentityperceptionstowardsreligiousorethnicgroupstojustify

    violence.65TheprecariouspositionoftheYazidiminorityinIraq,asexplainedearlierinthe

    chapter,playedanimportantroleinIS’stargetingofthiscommunity.Thelawlessnessand

  • 13

    insecuritycreatedbysectarianviolenceinIraqfurtherexacerbatedexistingdiscriminatory

    attitudestowardstheYezidis,aswellasotherminoritycommunities.66

    ISexplicitlyjustifieditsgenderedviolenceagainsttheYezidisthroughits

    interpretationofcertainIslamicrulesandpractices.ItdefinedtheYezidisasa“pagan”

    minorityandnon-believersandtreatedthemdifferentlyfrommembersofotherreligions

    suchasChristians.AccordingtoISideology,ChristiansandJewsareconsideredasthe

    “PeopleoftheBook”whocanbetreatedasimmunefromcertainpracticesduringwar,such

    asabductingandrapingfemalemembersofthesecommunities.67ISbelievedthatitwas

    allowedtokillmalemembersoftheYezidicommunityiftheydonotconverttoIslam,and

    toabduct,rapeandselltheYezidiwomenandgirls,andforcethemtodohouselabor.68

    Aftertheircapture,theYezidiwomenandchildrenweresharedamongstISfightersthat

    participatedintheoccupationofSinjarandafterthatonefifthofthecaptives,inIS

    terminology‘slaves’,weretransferredtotheISauthoritiestobedividedas‘profit’.69

    CapturedYezidiwomenandgirlslivedundercircumstancesinwhichtheyhadnocontrol,

    andtheywereentirelystrippedofftheirabilitytocontroltheirlife,bodyanddignity.

    TheYezidicommunity’sowngendernorms,especiallytheembodimentofmen’s

    andfamilies’‘honor’inwomen’sbodies,madetheseattacksparticularlyunsettlingforthe

    community.Yezidis’gendernormswereusedasatoolbyIStodiscourageabductedYezidi

    womennottoescape.Yezidisurvivorswerereportedtosaythattheircaptivestoldthem

    thatiftheyreturnedtotheircommunities,theywouldbekilled,referringtothepracticeof

    ‘honor’killing,orwouldnotbeacceptedbackhome.70TheYezidis,includingYezidileaders,

    considerthesexualviolenceperpetratedbyISagainstYezidiwomenandgirlsasanattack

    againstthewholeofthecommunity.AsMîrTehsînSeîdBeg,thehereditaryleaderofthe

    YezidisstatedtheYezidiscouldhavemaybereconciledandwentbacktolivingwiththeir

    Arabneighborsevenafterkillings;butIS’treatmentofthousandsofYezidiwomenand

    girlswouldmakeitveryhardtoreconcile.71TheexperiencesoftheYezidisleftlastingscars

    forthecommunityandledtoextremelevelsofpost-wartraumaandPTSD.72

    SexualandotherformsofviolenceexperiencedbytheYezidiscannotbetreatedas

    simplyanoutcomeofIS’sextrememethodsortheresultofconflict.Thereisawider

    contextofinequalityandstructuresinplacethatmadesuchviolencethinkableand

    feasible.InterviewswithmembersoftheYezidicommunitysuggestthatthecommunityis

  • 14

    awareofthesewidercircumstances.Theyassociatetheirexperiencesofviolenceand

    sexualviolencetothelong-termdisadvantagesofbeingaminoritygroupinthedisputed

    territoriesinIraqandthehistoricalprejudicesagainsttheircommunity.Likemanyother

    minoritycommunitiesinIraq,alargesectionoftheYezidicommunityislocatedin

    disputedterritories(betweentheKurdishregionalgovernmentandtheIraqigovernment),

    Beinginthislocationputstheminaprecariouspositionbecausetheseareasaretypically

    neglectedintermsofinfrastructure,economicinvestmentandprovisionofsecurityand

    protection.Moreover,thehistoryofreligiousprejudiceagainstthecommunityandthe

    distrustbetweenYezidisandIraqiandKurdishhaveexacerbatedtheprecariousnessof

    theirposition.Gendernormsalsoplayedakeyroleintheseoutcomes.Theideathat

    womencanbeboughtandsoughtforsexualpurposeslikeacommodityandthattheycan

    beentirelystrippedofftheiragencyisaclearexampleofthis.Thisextremeformof

    discriminationandviolencepracticedagainstYezidiwomencanbeseenaspartofa

    continuumofwiderdiscriminativepracticesandviolencesperpetratedagainstwomenin

    Iraqingeneral.73

    Yet,alongsidethis,thecommunity’sexperienceofgenderedviolencebyIShashada

    transformativeimpactonthepoliticalandsociallifeamongtheYezidicommunity.These

    impactscanbeanalyzedinthreeinterrelatedaspects.First,IS’sattacksanditsviolence

    againstYezidiwomenhadsignificanteffectonYezidiattitudesaboutsurvivorsofsexual

    violence.FemalesurvivorswhowereheldcaptivebyISandexposedtosexualandother

    formsofviolencewereinitiallyhesitantaboutreturningtotheirfamiliesandcommunities.

    Theyfearedtheywouldberejectedorkilledfor“tainting”the“honor”ofthefamily.74With

    theFebruary2015DeclarationbytheYazidireligiousauthorities,survivorwomenaswell

    aswomenandmenwhowereforcedtoconverttoIslamwerere-acceptedtothe

    community.Afterthisdeclaration,numberofwomenandgirlsreturningtotheir

    communityincreased.However,thisdoesnotmeanstigmaaroundbeingsexuallyassaulted

    havedisappearedandlifeafterreturnhasbeeneasyforreturnees.Moreover,manyof

    thesewomenandgirlscontinuetolivewithuntreatedtraumaandindifficultconditionsof

    displacementawayfromtheirhomes.SomeofthesewomenhavemigratedtoEuropean

    countriesandexperiencingotherdifficultiessuchasbeingawayfromhomeandfamily,and

  • 15

    adjustingtolifeinadifferentculture.75Finally,thesituationofchildrenborntoYezidi

    womenrapedbytheirIScaptorsisaparticularlychallengingissue.76

    AnothersignificantimpactofsexualviolenceagainstYezidiwomenandgirlsisthat

    taboosaroundtalkingaboutsexualviolenceintheYezidicommunityhasweakenedafter

    thisexperience.Generally,sexualviolenceisconsideredasadifficultissuetomakepublic

    andacknowledgeinmostsocieties,aspreviouscasesofsexualviolenceinarmedconflicts

    acrosstheworldshowed.77Therehasbeenapublicsilenceabouttheexperiencesof

    KurdishwomensexuallyassaultedduringtheAnfalcampaign.78Insharpcontrast,sexual

    violencehasbecomepartofthepublicdiscourseandYezidisintegrateditintotheir

    communicationwithoutsidersandIraqiandKurdishauthoritiestoexplaintheirsituation,

    requestsupportandexpresstheirneedsanddemands.Malecommunityleaders,and

    brothers,fathersandhusbandsofsurvivorsofsexualviolencehaveopenlydiscussedthe

    issue.Thisisaninterestingdevelopmentbecauseratherthanshyingawayfromit,Yezidis

    areopenlytalkingaboutsexualviolenceinnationalandinternationalplatforms.Nadia

    Murad,aYezidisexualviolencesurvivorherself,isseenasaspokespersonfor

    communicatingYezidis’experiencesandneeds,anddemandjusticeandprotectionforher

    community.ThesenoveldevelopmentsareunprecedentedinthehistoryoftheYezidi

    community.

    Finally,thereareindicatorsofchangingperceptionsaboutwomen’sroleand

    positioninsocietyamongtheYezidicommunity.Thisisfortworeasons.First,the

    experienceofgenocideandsexualviolencemadethecommunityonceagainrealizethat

    theirpositionasacommunityinIraqisprecarious.Theydonothavethenecessarysupport

    politicalandeconomicstructuresandprotectionmechanisms.Therefore,someofthe

    communitymembersbelievethatempoweringgirlsthroughenablingthemtoaccessto

    educationandjobscanprovidethemsomeformofprotection.Anumberofinterviewees

    saidthatiftheirpeopleinSinjarweremoreeducatedandmoreawareoftheirlifeoutside

    theircommunities,thegenocideagainsttheircommunitywouldnothavehappened.79The

    secondfactorthatcontributedtochangingperceptionsaboutwomen’spositionis

    displacement.DisplacedSinjariYezidisinSheikhanandDuhokwereabletomeetwith

    YezidislivingintheseareasandinteractwithmembersoftheYezididiaspora.Yezidisin

    Sinjarhavegenerallymoreconservativenormsaboutwomen’spositioninsociety

  • 16

    comparedtoYezidisintheDuhokregionthathavebeenunderKurdishrule.Afterthe

    attacks,severaleducatedandexperiencedlocalYezidiwomeninDuhokandSheikhan

    begantoworkwithwomen’srightsorganizationsandhumanitarianorganizationsto

    providesupportforsurvivinganddisplacedSinjariYezidisandmetandworkedwiththem.

    OneoftheinterviewedhumanitarianNGOworkers,whoisaYezidiherself,said“the

    Shingali80womenwereinitiallyreluctantbutthenstartedtoparticipateintrainingand

    evenstartedworking.”Sheattributedthispartlytotheexpositionofthemoreconservative

    SinjariYezidicommunitiestothemoreopenlifeoftheYezidisinDuhok:“theShingali

    communitybecamemoreopentowardswomenbecausetheysawotherYazidiwomen,like

    thosefromSharia.Theysawthattheirwomenareopen,theygotowork,theygotoschool,

    sotheythoughttobealittlebitmoreopenwiththeirwomenaswell.”81

    Conclusion

    Thegeneralfeelingofinsecuritycharacterizingpost-SaddamIraq,theriseofSunni

    extremism,theconflictbetweentheKRGandIraqicentralgovernmentinvolvingYezidi

    lands,andthefurtherfragmentationofthecommunityviamigrationsandforced

    displacementshavemadeitincreasinglydifficult,ifnotimpossible,forYezidistoseek

    politicalaccommodationasanon-assertiveminoritygroup.Thegenocidalattacksin2014

    hasstronglyreinforcedthistrendandcontributedaproliferationofvoicesandplatforms

    aboutdistinctiveYezidiidentityatlocal,national,andinternationallevels.Inthisregard,

    Yezidisarelatecomerstotheglobalpoliticsofrecognitionchallengingallegedlydifference-

    blindpoliciesanddemandingdignityforparticulargroupidentities.82

    TheYezidipoliticsofrecognitionrepresentsamajorchangeinthecommunity’sself-

    identificationandrepresentationgiventhelonghistoryofYezidisasaliminalcommunity

    lackingofficialrecognitionduringtheOttomantimesandwidespreadprejudicesabout

    theirbeliefsystemspersistinguntilnow.Itentailsastrongemphasisonthedistinctive

    natureofYezidiidentityandhistory,andarequestforaccountabilityofthecrimes

    committedagainstYezidisinformedbydiscoursesoftransitionaljusticeandfeminism.This

    requestforrecognitionalsoentailsastronggenderdimension.Thetraumaticexperienceof

    systematicsexualviolencepushedthecommunitytoquestiongender-relatedtaboosand

    normsandwomen’spositioninprivateandpubliclife,andtoinitiatesomechanges.In

  • 17

    theirdemandsforprotectionandrecognition,Yezidiadvocacygroupsandactivistshave

    explicitlyincorporatedYezidiwomen,genderdimensionandsexualviolence.Allthese

    haveledtosignificantsymbolicgainsthatelevatedYezidisfromanobscureminorityinto

    aninternationallyrecognizedreligiousminoritysufferingfromcrimesagainsthumanity

    anddeservingrespectandprotection.

    Ironically,thisriseofautonomousYezidipoliticsisaccompaniedwithanincreasing

    communalfragmentationanddispersionand,aninvolvementofanevengreaternumberof

    externalactorsinYezidiaffairs.Thepost-warconditionsinSinjarremainprohibitivefor

    therevitalizationoftheYezidilifethere;geopoliticalrivalriesinvolvingmultiplelocaland

    regionalforcesmaketheformationofanautonomouszoneforYezidishighlyimplausible.

    Underthesecircumstances,onecanexpectthatYezididiasporawouldincreasinglyplaya

    moreimportantroleinsustainingYezidicollectiveidentity,shapingitsglobalimage,and

    transformingrelationswithinthecommunity.

    References

    Ali,MajidHassan."AspirationsforEthnonationalistIdentitiesamongReligiousMinorities

    inIraq:TheCaseofYazidiIdentityinthePeriodofKurdishandArabNationalism,

    1963–2003."NationalitiesPapers(2019):1-15.

    Allison,Christine.““UnbelievableSlownessofMind”:YezidiStudies,FromNineteenthto

    Twenty-FirstCentury.”TheJournalofKurdishStudies20086:1-23.

    Baser,Bahar,andMariToivanen."Thepoliticsofgenociderecognition:Kurdishnation-

    buildingandcommemorationinthepost-Saddamera."JournalofGenocide

    Research19.3(2017):404-42.

    Batatu,Hanna.TheOldSocialClassesandtheRevolutionaryMovementsofIraq.Princeton:

    PrincetonUniversityPress,1978.

    Bor,Güley."Responsetoandreparationsforconflict-relatedsexualviolenceinIraq:the

    caseofShi'aTurkmeninTelAfar."LSEMiddleEastCentreReports.London,UK,2019.

    Availableathttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/102145/.

    Cetorelli,Valeria,etal."MortalityandkidnappingestimatesfortheYazidipopulationinthe

    areaofmountSinjar,Iraq,inaugust2014:aretrospectivehouseholdsurvey."PLoS

    medicine14.5(2017):1-10.

  • 18

    CindîReşo,Xelîl.“Mîrgeha:ŞêxanûŞingalûKilîs.”KürtTarihiDergisi15(2014).

    Çelebi,Evliya.GünümüzTürkçesiyleEvliyâÇelebiSeyahatnâmesi.Istanbul:YapıKredi

    Yayınları,2013.

    Davies, S.E. and J. True (2015), ‘Reframing Conflict-Related Sexual and Gender-Based

    Violence: Bringing Gender Analysis Back In’, Security Dialogue, 46 (6): 495-512.

    Deringil,Selim.Thewell-protecteddomains:ideologyandthelegitimationofpowerinthe

    OttomanEmpire,1876-1909.London:I.B.Tauris,1999.

    Dinç,Namık.Şengalsoykırımı:êzîdîlerin73.Fermanı.Diyarbakır,ZanVakfıYayınları,

    2017.

    Erdem,HakanY.SlaveryintheOttomanEmpireanditsDemise,1800-1909.NewYork:St.

    Martin’sPress,1996.

    Erdener,Eda."Thewaysofcopingwithpost-wartraumaofYezidirefugeewomenin

    Turkey."Women'sstudiesinternationalforum65(2017):60-70.

    Forbes,Frederick."AVisittotheSinjarHillsin1838,withsomeaccountoftheSectof

    Yezidis,andofvariousplacesintheMesopotamianDesert,betweentheRiversTigris

    andKhabur."JournaloftheRoyalGeographicalSocietyofLondon9(1839):409-430.

    Fuccaro,Nelida."Ethnicity,stateformation,andconscriptioninpostcolonialIraq:Thecase

    oftheYazidiKurdsofJabalSinjar."InternationalJournalofMiddleEastStudies29.4

    (1997):559-580.

    Fuccaro,Nelida."CommunalismandtheStateinIraq:theYazidiKurds,c.1869–

    1940."MiddleEasternStudies35.2(1999):1-26.

    GenevaInternationalCentreforJustice2015

    Goner,Ozlem.TurkishNationalIdentityanditsoutsiders:Memoriesofstateviolencein

    Dersim.NewYork:Routledge,2017.

    Gölbaşı,Edip.“Turningthe“Heretics”intoLoyalMuslimSubjects:ImperialAnxieties,the

    PoliticsofReligiousConversion,andtheYezidisintheHamidianEra.”TheMuslimWorld

    103(2013):3-23.

    Guest,JohnS.SurvivalamongtheKurds:AHistoryoftheYezidis.London:KeganPaul

    International,1993.

    Gülsoy,Ufuk.“SıradışıbirDinîTopluluk:OsmanlıYezidîleri(XIX.veXX.Yüzyıllar).”Türk

    KültürüİncelemeleriDergisi7(2002):129-162.

  • 19

    HumanRightsWatch.OnVulnerableGround:ViolenceagainstMinorityCommunitiesin

    NinevehProvince’sDisputedTerritorities(2009).Availableat

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/11/10/vulnerable-ground/violence-against-

    minority-communities-nineveh-provinces-disputed.

    HumanRightsWatch.FlawedJustice:AccountabilityforISISCrimesinIraq(2017).Available

    athttps://www.hrw.org/report/2017/12/05/flawed-justice/accountability-isis-

    crimes-iraq.

    InternationalCrisisGroup.WinningthePost-ISISBattleforIraqinSinjar.MiddleEastreport

    No.183(2018).Availableathttps://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-

    africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/iraq/183-winning-post-isis-battle-iraq-sinjar.

    Jefferson,LaShawn(2004),‘InWarasinPeace:SexualViolenceandWomen’sStatus’,

    WorldReport,HumanRightsWatch.

    Joseph,J.(1961).TheNestoriansandtheirMuslimNeighbors:AstudyofWesterninfluenceon

    theirrelations.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

    Khenchelaoui,Zaïm.“TheYezidis,PeopleoftheSpokenWordinthemidstofPeopleofthe

    Book.”Diogenes187.47(1999):20-37.

    Kizilhan,JanIlhan."PTSDofrapeafterIS(“IslamicState”)captivity."Archivesofwomen's

    mentalhealth21.5(2018):517-52.

    Kreyenbroek,PhilipG.Yezidism—it’sbackground,observances’andtextualtradition.New

    York:TheEdwinMellenPress,1995.

    LeagueofNations.QuestionoftheFrontierbetweenTurkeyandIraq.Reportsubmittedto

    theCouncilbytheCommissioninstitutedbytheCouncilResolutionofSeptember30th,

    1924(1925).

    Maisel,Sebastian."SocialChangeamidstTerrorandDiscrimination:YezidisintheNew

    Iraq.TheMiddleEastInstitutePolicyBrief18(2008).

    McGee,Thomas."Savingthesurvivors:Yezidiwomen,IslamicStateandtheGerman

    AdmissionsProgramme."KurdishStudies6.1(2018):85-109.

    Moradi,Fazil.TheForceofWritinginGenocide:OnSexualViolenceintheal-Anfāl.In

    VictoriaSanford,KaterinaStefatos,andCeciliaM.Salvi(eds.)GenderViolenceinPeace

    andWar:StatesofComplicity.2016

  • 20

    Nicolaus,Peter,andSerkanYuce."ALookattheYezidiJourneytoSelf-discoveryandEthnic

    Identity."IranandtheCaucasus23.1(2019):87-104.

    Parry,OswaldH.SixMonthsinaSyrianMonastery.London:HoraceCox,1895.

    Pinker,Steven.Thebetterangelsofournature:Whyviolencehasdeclined.NewYork:Viking,

    2011.

    Oehring,Otmar.ChristiansandYazidisinIraq:CurrentSituationandProspects.Konrad

    AdenauerStiftung(2017).Availableathttps://d-nb.info/1141052792/34.

    OfficeoftheUnitedHighCommissionerforHumanRights(OCHR).“Theycametodestroy”:

    ISISCrimesagainsttheYazidis(2016).Availableat

    https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoISyria/A_HRC_32_CRP.2_

    en.pdf.

    Savelsberg,Eva,SiamendHajo,andIreneDulz."EffectivelyUrbanized.Yezidisinthe

    CollectiveTownsofSheikhanandSinjar."Étudesrurales186(2010):101-116.

    Scott,James,TheArtofNotBeingGoverned:AnAnarchistHistoryofUplandSoutheastAsia.

    NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress,2009.

    Spät.Estzer.YezidiIdentityPoliticsandPoliticalAmbitionsintheWakeoftheISISAttack.

    JournalofBalkanadNearEasternStudies20.5(2018):420-438.

    Taylor,Charles.ThePoliticsofRecognition.InAmyGutmann(ed.)Multiculturalism:

    ExaminingthePoliticsofRecognition,pp.25-86.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,

    1994

    Tezcür,GüneşMurat."APathoutofPatriarchy?PoliticalAgencyandSocialIdentityof

    WomenFighters."PerspectivesonPolitics(2019).

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719000288.

    Turshen, Meredith, ‘The Political Economy of Violence Against Women During Armed Conflict

    in Uganda’, Social Research, 67 (3): 803-824.

    UNAMIDistrictAnalysisSummary:SinjarDistrictandQahtaniyaSub-District.(2009)

    UnitedNationsHumanSettlementsProgrammeinIraq(UNHABITAT).EmergingLand

    TenureIssuesamongDisplacedYazidisfromSinjar,Iraq.(2015).Avavailableat

    https://unhabitat.org/wp-

    content/uploads/2015/12/Emerging%20Land%20Tenure%20Issues%20among%20D

    isplaced%20Yazidis%20from%20Sinjar%20Iraq.pdf.

  • 21

    UnitedNationsHighCommissionerforRefugees(UNHCR).BackgroundInformationonthe

    SituationofNon-MuslimReligiousMinoritiesinIraq(2005).Availableat

    https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4371cf5b4.pdf.

    UnitedStatesInstituteofPeace(USIP).Iraq’sDisputedTerritories:AViewofthePolitical

    HorizonandImplicationsforU.S.Policy(2011).Availableat

    https://www.usip.org/publications/2011/04/iraqs-disputed-territories.

    Yılmaz,Arzu.Gegeneinander,miteinander:DieKDPunddiePKKinSindschar.InGünter

    Seufert(ed.)DieKurdenimIrakundinSyriennachdemEndederTerritorial-herrschaft

    des“IslamischenStaates”StiftungWissenschaftundPolitik,2018.

    1Pinker2011.2HeisreferringtotheatrocitiescommittedbyalocalKurdishruler,MirMohammadofSoran.InterviewedconductedinSheikhaninSeptember2017.3Kreyenbroek1995.4Khenchelaoui1999,23-5.5Allison2008.6Aslateas1935,TheNewYorkTimesdescribedYezidisas“devil-worshippers”inanarticleaboutapunitiveIraqiexpeditiontoMt.Sinjar.“RebelliousYezidisaresubduedinIraq,”TheNewYorkTimes,October26,1935.7MirMohammadofSoran,whoseviolentcampaignleftastronglegacyinYezidioraltraditions,attackedYezidisbecausetheywerealliedwithhisrival,theBehdinanEmirate.Layard1850,276-7;Longrigg1925,28;Guest1993,67-9.8InYezidihistoriography,thesecampaignsmakeapluralityoffirmanstargetingthecommunity.CindîReşo2014.9Çelebi2013,50.Kreyenbroek(1995,36)observesthattheviolenteventsbetweenthe14thcenturyandthecampaignofMirMohammadofSoranin1832leftlittletraceincollectivememoryoftheYezidis.10Ibid,51-4.HewritesthatthiscampaigntooktherevengeofKarbala(54).Infact,thereisawidespreadassociationbetweenYezidisandCaliphYazidwhosesoldiersmassacredthegrandsonofProphetMohammadandhisfollowersinKarbalain680.ThismonumentaleventgraduallyledtotheschismbetweenSunniandShiiteMuslims.ForadetailedandnuanceddiscussionofthereverenceshowntoYazidinYeziditradition,seeKreyenbroek,37.11Gölbaşı2013,3-4.12Dersimwasthesceneofstate-ledmassacresin1937and1938.FortheOttoman/TurkishperceptionofDersimanditspeople,seeGoner2017,chp1.13Scott(2009,13)callsthegreatmountainouszoneinSoutheastAsia,Zomia,as“oneofthelargestremainingnonstatespacesintheworld,ifnotthelargest.”14ThisinterpretationdisagreeswithGülsoy(2002)whoarguesthatreligiousdifferencesneverhadprimaryinfluenceontheOttomantreatmentofYezidis.HearguesthatOttomanstargetedYezidisonlywhentheythreatenedthepublicorder(134-5).15ForYezidisincontemporaryTranscaucasia,especiallyArmenia,seeNicolausandYuce2019.16ABritishofficervisitedSinjarduringthisperiod(Forbes1839).17Fuccaro1999,4.18Gölbaşı(2009)providesahighlyinformativenarrativeoftheOttoman-Yezidirelationsregardingconscription.19Guest,104;Gölbaşı2009,95.20Erdem(1996,46,59-60)writesthatthepost-1856TanzimaterabroughtanendtotheOttomanpracticetoenslavementofdisobedientpopulations.Atthesametime,Parry(1895)observesthatthisfindesiècle

  • 22

    campaignentailedthekidnappingsofYezidiwomenandgirlsandtheirforcedmarriagetotheOttomansoldiers.21Deringil1999,71-5.TheOttomanstateeventuallyreturnedthepossessionoftheLalishtempleandsacredobjectstotheYezidireligiousleadership.22LeagueofNations1925.23Fuccaro1997.24TherewaslittlemodernpoliticalparticipationamongYezidis.Forinstance,theCommunistPartyofIraqthatattractedmarginalizedethnicandreligiousgroupssuchasChristians,Kurds,andShiiteArabshadverylittleYezidirepresentation.Batatu1978,1190.25Ali2019.26ItalsoaimedtogenerateahistoriographylinkingYezidistotheUmayyadcaliphateandarguingfortheirArabicroots.SeeMajidAliHassanchapterinthisvolume.27Savelsberg,Hajo,andDulz2010.28Heavymajorities(morethantwo-thirds)inAnbarandSalahuddinvotedno.HadthenovoteinNinevehalsoreachedthetwo-thirds,theconstitutionwouldberejected.BBC2005.29AYezidipoliticianaffiliatedwithaKurdishpartyresembledDinjartoDarfurregionofSudangivenitsunderdevelopment.InterviewwithXXX,May2018-XXX.30InterviewwithKhidirDomle,May2019.-XXX.31UNAMI2009(WethankPeterBartuforsharingthisdocumentwithus);HRW2009.AUSdiplomaticcablefrom2008publishedbyWikileaksnotesthatMirTahsinSaidBeg,theforemostYezidileader,wasworriedwithforcefultransferofYezidipropertytoKurdishownershipinSheikhanwiththegoalofincreasingthenumberofKurdsinthedisputedterritoriesofNineveh.Availableathttps://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08BAGHDAD3776_a.html. 32UNHCR2005.33UNAMI200934UNAMI2009.AccordingtoUNHABITAT(2015),theSinjarregionhadapopulationof339,000beforetheAugust2014attacks.Yezidismadearound74percentofthispopulation.35HRW2009.36SomeYezidislabeltheseattacksas“the73rdfirman.”37ThisYezidipartywontheparliamentaryseatallocatedforYezidisinthe2005Iraqielections.38UNAMI2009;USIP2011.TherewasasignificantincreaseinthenumberofvotersinSinjarbetween2005and2009leadingtotheallegationsofvotingfraud.39Spät(2018,426)observesthisideaoffusionbetweenKurdishandYezidiidentitiesfoundalessreceptiveaudienceamongtheYezidisofSinjarthantheYezidislivingeastoftheTigris,whohavealongerandmoreintensehistoryofcontactwiththeKurds.40ThisdraftconstitutionalsotalksaboutreligiousfreedomofYezidisinArticles65and124.Forananalysisofandtextofthedraft,seeKelly2010.41TherewasasingleYezidipoliticianaffiliatedwiththeKDP,SheikhShamo,intheKRGparliamentelectedin2013.TwoYezidisonefromKDPandanotherfromPUK,gainedseatsintheSeptember2018parliamentaryelections.TheinabilityofYezidisfromSinjar,manyofwhomlivedincampsintheDuhokprovince,significantlyundermineselectoralpowersoftheYezidisintheKRGelections.Ironically,thesedisplacedYezidiswereallowedtovoteintheKurdishindependencereferenduminSeptember2017.42Dinç2017.43Cetorellietal.,2017.44AsofAugust2019,3,509ofthesecaptiveswereliberated,mostlythroughransompayments,accordingtothestatisticsannouncedbytheKRG.45Kocho,wheretheworstatrocitiestookplace,remainedundersiegeuntilAugust15whentheISmilitantsraidedthetown,executedadultmalesingroups,andenslavedwomenandchildren.Accordingtosurvivortestimonies,ISmilitantsincludedArabsfromneighboringvillages.46TheexceptiontothispatternisthetownofHerdan,locatedinthenorthwesternpartofMt.Sinjar,whichwasattackedbytheneighboringSunniTurkomans.47AsofFebruary2017,therewerearound36,000familiesinIDPcampsintheDohukprovinceoftheKRG.Around77percentofthesefamilieswereYezidis(BRHA2017,18).

  • 23

    48“ObamaallowslimitedairstrikesonISIS,”TheNewYorkTimes,August7,2014.Availableathttps://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/middleeast/obama-weighs-military-strikes-to-aid-trapped-iraqis-officials-say.html. 49OHCHR2016.50McGee2018.51Themostwell-knownoftheseassociationsareYazdaandFreeYezidiFoundation.52TheICChasjurisdictionovercrimescommittedbyISmilitantswhoarecitizensofthecountriesthataremembersofthecourt.ItisalsopossiblefortheUNSecurityCounciltoreferacasetotheICC,asithappenedwithatrocitiesinDarfurin2005.Becauseofthisreferral,theICCProsecutorissuedanindictmentofthenSudanesePresidentOmaral-Bashirandaccusedhimcommittingthecrimeofgenocide.YettheTrumpadministration,whichisopenlyhostiletotheICC,wasnotwillingtoreferthecaseofISatrocitiestotheinternationalcourt.53HRW2017.54InterviewsinDohuk,May2018.55InastatementdeliveredonthefourthanniversaryoftheISattacks,then-KRGPrimeMinisterNechirwanBarzanidescribedtheevents“asoneofthemostbarbaricgenocidesofthe21stcentury.”Rudaw,August3,2018.Availableathttps://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/030820182. 56BaserandToivanen2017.57WhilemanyYezidiswereagnosticabouttheKurdishreferendumin2017,MirTahsinSaidBeg,whodiedinJanuary2019,askedYezidistosupportKurdishindependence.“JiMîreÊzidiyênCîhanêbangareferandûmê”Rudaw,September23,2017.Availableathttps://www.rudaw.net/kurmanci/kurdistan/230920175.58YazdaPressRelease,May15,2016.Availableathttps://www.facebook.com/yazda.organization/posts/yazda-press-releasea-statement-about-recent-political-developments-in-shingal-si/484781928398425/. 59DemandsforautonomyhavealonghistoryamongtheAssyriansgoingbacktotheformativeyearsofIraq.Joseph1961,chp8.60ICG2018.ShiiteviewsofYezidisarecomplicatedbythewidespreadperceptionthatYezidisarefollowersofCaliphYazid,themosthatedfigureintheShiitehistoriography.Atthesametime,thereisnohistoryofYezidi-Shiiteintercommunalconflictinrecenthistorygiventheirlimitedgeographicalcontact.Infact,YezidisandShiitesofSinjarwereparticipatinginsimilarritualsandveneratingthesameshrineinthepost-2003period.Dirasat2016,95.Moreover,ShiiteauthoritiesstronglycondemnedtheIScrueltyagainstYezidisandAyatollahAliSistanimetwithaYezididelegation.Ibid,404-5.61ForanoverviewofKDP-PKKtensionsoverSinjar,seeYılmaz2018.62ThePKKpresenceinSinjaraggravatedthreatperceptionoftheTurkishstatethatconductedairstrikesintheareainnumeroustimes.63ForthemotivesofwomenjoiningthePKKanditsgenderpolitics,seeTezcür2019.64Jefferson2014.65DaviesandTrue2015,505.66Maisel2008;Oehring2017.Shi’iiteTurkmenwomenandgirls,albeitatasignificantlylowerscale,werealsoamongminoritiesinIraqthatwereexposedtosexualviolencebyIS.Bor2019.67Inpractice,thisdistinctionwasnotalwayskept.ISmembersdidalsokidnapped,raped,andenslavedChristianwomen.“ChristianwomenkidnappedbyISreunitedwithfatherafterfouryears,”Kurdistan24,April5,2018.Availableathttps://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/987a77c3-56c3-44b7-a8f9-e6a8d63d0e00.68Dabiq2014,Issue4,pp.14-15.69Dabiq2014,Issue4,p.15.70InterviewswithmembersofYezidicommunity,May2018,Duhok.71InterviewwithPrinceHassan,May2018,Prince’sHouseinSheikhan.72Erdener2017;Kizilhan2018.73GenevaInternationalCentreforJustice2015,pp.18-22.74InterviewwithtwoYezidisexualviolencesurvivors,Sharyacamp,Duhok,May2018.75McGee2018.76AccordingtothreedifferentNGOsources,thenumberofmotherswithchildrenfromISISwasaround200asofMay2018.SomewomengavetheirchildrentothePKKandsomeofthemreturnedandtookshelterwiththeirchildunderthePKK.Yazidisurvivorswithchildrensometimesfinddifferentstrategiestonavigatein

  • 24

    thissituation.Someclaimtotheirfamiliesthattheymetahusband(usuallydeadormissing)atsomepointandthechildwashis.Eventhoughthisisnottrue,andthefamilyknowsthis,theyacceptit.Somemotherswanttokeepthechild;somedonot.InterviewsinDuhokandSheikhan,May2018.ThetopicremainshighlycontroversialamongYezidis.OnApril24,2019,YezidiSupremeSpiritualCouncilissuedadeclarationacceptingthesechildrentothecommunitybeforereversingitthreedayslater.77Jefferson2014;Turshen2001,p.66.78Moradi2016.79InterviewswithYezidicommunitymembers,December2017andMay2018,Duhok.80ShingalisthelocalnameforSinjar.81InterviewwithaYezidifemalehumanitarianNGOstaff,May2018,Duhok.82Fromthisperspective,thelackofrecognitionofmisrecognitioncanbeaformofoppressionTaylor1994.