37
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 20 OF 2020 FROM : 06-10-2020 To 08-10-2020 COURT NO. : 4 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT NOTE :- [ ON 06.10.2020 & 08.10.2020 ] REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 5356/2007 XVII-A V.K. VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SHALU SHARMA Connected C.A. No. 157/2017 XVII-A IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH Versus M/S. NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA NYK LINE (NIPPON YUSEN KAISHA) . AND ORS. ASHOK MATHUR[R-2], AAKARSH KAMRA[R-4] Connected SLP(C) No. 3390/2019 XVII-A CHAITALI BHATTACHARJEE ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1] Versus SOMNATH BISWAL AND ORS. SOUMYA DUTTA[R-1] Connected C.A. No. 6108/2018 XVII-A SHREE SHARDA CHAINS PVT. LTD. VISHAL PRASAD Versus PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. IA No.67084/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.67085/2018-STAY APPLICATION Connected C.A. No. 5795/2018 XVII-A CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1] Versus VA TECH WABAG LIMITED MANAGING DIRECTOR VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1] FOR ADMISSION and IA No.66231/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.66229/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL Connected C.A. No. 3350/2018 XVII-A THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (FORMERLY THE BANK OF NEW YORK) AKSHAT GOEL Versus METCO EXPORT INTERNATIONAL AND ORS. TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1], P. I. JOSE[R-2] FOR ADMISSION and I.R. Connected C.A. No. 5355/2007 XVII-A PREM VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK M. T. GEORGE, SHALU SHARMA, [R-2] Connected C.A. No. 5354/2007 XVII-A UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA Versus M/S. DIWAKAR GOIRAM PORKHAYAT NIKHIL GOEL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 20 OF 2020 FROM : 06-10-2020 To 08-10-2020

COURT NO. : 4HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

NOTE:-[ ON 06.10.2020 & 08.10.2020 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 5356/2007

XVII-AV.K. VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHADVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SHALU SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 157/2017XVII-A

IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECOMPANY LTD. AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH

VersusM/S. NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKIKAISHA NYK LINE (NIPPON YUSENKAISHA) . AND ORS.

ASHOK MATHUR[R-2], AAKARSH KAMRA[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3390/2019XVII-A

CHAITALI BHATTACHARJEE ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1]

VersusSOMNATH BISWAL AND ORS. SOUMYA DUTTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6108/2018XVII-A

SHREE SHARDA CHAINS PVT. LTD. VISHAL PRASAD

VersusPARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD.IA No.67084/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.67085/2018-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 5795/2018XVII-A

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERALINSURANCE COMPANY LTD. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusVA TECH WABAG LIMITED MANAGINGDIRECTOR VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.66231/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.66229/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 3350/2018XVII-A

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON(FORMERLY THE BANK OF NEW YORK) AKSHAT GOEL

VersusMETCO EXPORT INTERNATIONAL ANDORS. TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1], P. I. JOSE[R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.ConnectedC.A. No. 5355/2007XVII-A

PREM VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK M. T. GEORGE, SHALU SHARMA, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5354/2007XVII-A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S. DIWAKAR GOIRAM PORKHAYAT NIKHIL GOEL

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No.5352-5353/2007XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AMIT KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

HARSOLIA MOTORS AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, , SANTOSH KUMAR -I[INT]

FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2006 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2015 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 2821/2012XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AMIT KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

M/S ANKUR . AND ANR. RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPINGUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. D 31862/2015XVII-A

SH. SATISH MAHESHWARI PROPRIETOR AWANISH SINHA

VersusM/S MSC AGENCY (INDIA) PVT. LTD.AND ANR.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2016 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1039/2020XVII-A

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECOMPANY LIMITED GOPAL SINGH

VersusM/S OPG ENERGY (P) LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

2 C.A. No. 244/2007IV

M/S. ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAIVersus

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR.ANIL KATIYARMUSHTAQ AHMAD, [INT], GAGRAT AND CO,[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 351/2007IV

M/S. PUNJAB TRACTORS LTD. RAJIV TYAGI[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3208/2007IV

M/S RICO AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.4804-4807/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD. KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4051/2007IV

M/S. VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4045/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4046/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4047/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

Versus

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4121/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICLAS LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4049/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4122/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4043/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4044/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5629/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX-I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5001/2008XVII

M/S VEE GEE INDUSTRIESENTERPRISES THRU ITS CHIEFOPERATING OFFICER

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3270/2009IV-B

M/S.VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANDORS AND ORS.

3 Crl.A. No. 989/2007II-A

DEVI LAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1]

4 C.A. No. 7289/2009XVII-A

C.M.D.,CITY UNION BANK LIMITED .AND ANR. K. K. MANI

VersusR.CHANDRAMOHAN KRISHAN KUMAR

5 C.A. No. 10232/2010XII-A

M/S SUBEDAR SAHEB CHOULTRYTRUST BOARD P. N. RAMALINGAM

Versus

CHINTALA UDYA SHANKAR AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, ARUNA GUPTA[R-1],[R-3], G. MADHAVI, [R-2]

and IA No.97825/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ConnectedC.A. No.10234-10243/2010XII-A

BODAPATI PADMAVATI AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAM

Versus

CHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR . AND ORS. G. MADHAVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10233/2010XII-A

THE SECRETARY RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusCHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAM

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4and IA No.133191/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

6 C.A. No. 289/2011III-A

SHAMBHU SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[P-1]Versus

SHANKER RAI AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], MANOJK. MISHRA[R-5]

7 C.A. No.6015-6018/2010XII

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusV. ELAYAPERUMAL AND ANR. S. R. SETIA

8 C.A. No.6502-6503/2009X

CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT..AND ANR. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusGOVIND PRASAD KEDIYAL T. MAHIPAL

9 C.A. No. 2834/2010XII

A.V.SURESHBABU AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHYVersusP.PERUMAL . AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY, V. G. PRAGASAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2842/2010XII

S.KARTHIKEYAN AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusR.CHELLAPPA AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY

10 C.A. No. 1114/2009IV-A

MAHADEV MALLAPPA HULLYAGOL RAJESH MAHALE[P-1]VersusSATIGOUDA YALAGOUDA PATIL (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-1.2], [R-1.9], [R-1.1],[R-1.8], [R-1.7], [R-1.6], [R-1.5], [R-1.4], [R-1.3]

11 C.A. No. 353/2008XVII-A

M/S DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIAPVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN[P-1]

VersusM/S CONTROLS AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY, NIRANJANA SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.19536-19537/2017XVII-A

MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PRIVATELIMITED AND ANR. SIDHARTH SETHI

VersusCG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD AND ORS. P. S. SUDHEER[R-1]

IA No.115716/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.115713/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.115711/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No./- and IANo.118473/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 2633/2018XVII-A

M/S. CG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusMERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD. ANDORS. SIDHARTH SETHI[CAVEAT]

IA No.17088/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.17089/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30173/2018XVII-A

M/S EASY ELEVATORS INDIA PVT LTD RAKESH KUMAR

VersusM/S NISSAN MOTORS INDIA PVT LTDAND ANR. MANJULA GUPTA[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 8935/2011XII

THANGAM AND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]VersusNAVAMANI AMMAL SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH[R-1][PR]

13 C.A. No. 2794/2010XV

GOPAL LAL SHOBHA GUPTAVersusGOKUL NARAIN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, H. S. PARIHAR

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 414 C.A. No. 1497/2008

IVJHABBAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[P-1]VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1498/2008IV

BALAK RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, S. JANANI

15 C.A. No. 1400/2013XIV-A

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-IV,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DAEWOO MOTORS INDIA LTD.

16 C.A. No. 1113/2013XII

J.PARASMUL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. KUNAL CHATTERJI

Versus

J.NAVAL KISHORE M. A. CHINNASAMY, PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR

17 C.A. No. 8090/2011XVI

NUNU MANDAL AND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASADVersusKRISHNA CHANDRA JHA . AND ORS. JITENDRA KUMAR, JOHN MATHEWFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 2/2009 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 3/2009

18 C.A. No. 2435/2010XII-A

MOTURU NALINI KANTH Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD DEVASA & CO.

19 C.A. No.2461-2462/2011XV

BASANT KISHORE (D) AND ANR.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-2.3], [P-2.2], [P-2.1],[P-2]

VersusRAJESHWAR PRASAD S. L. ANEJA

20 C.A. No. 6576/2008XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DHARAMPAL PREM CHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

21 C.A. No. 363/2009XIV-A

M/S YAMU INDUSTRIES LTD. S. RAJAPPAVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

22 C.A. No.6326-6329/2011XII-A

ORGANTI BALARAM . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, T. MAHIPAL, S. K.VERMA, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, MANUSHANKER MISHRA, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8]

(Application for vacating stay)I.A.../2012 (Application for permission to filemodification)I.A.../2012 (Application for modification)

ConnectedC.A. No. 6340/2011XII-A

GANGULA NARASIMHA AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. REP. BY ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA, ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA,VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 122659/2018 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 122665/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.6330-6339/2011XII-A

O. NARASIMHA . AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-9],[R-11], [R-13], [R-15], [R-17], [R-19]

FOR ON IA 1-10/2008 FOR [IANO. 11-12/2009 (APPLICATION FORIMPLEADMENT)] ON IA 39113/2009 FOR ON IA 41-50/2016

23 C.A. No. 431/2010IV-A

RAM KRISHNA ASHRAM AND ORS. NIRMAL CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

SHASHWAT PANDEY . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-8],ATUL KUMAR[R-10], RUPESH KUMAR[R-11]

24 C.A. No.4534-4535/2009XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMAD

VersusSAWAMI VISHOKA NAND BHARTI ANDANR. MADHUSMITA BORA

25 C.A. No. 2768/2009IV

M/S.STEEL STRIPS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[P-1]VersusM/S. O.P. STEEL TRADERS AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

26 C.A. No. 507/2011III-A

INDIAN VETERINARY RESEARCHINSTITUTE (IVRI) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], M. P.SHORAWALA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

27 C.A. No. 2640/2009IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD VISHWA PAL SINGH

VersusM/S PARAMOUNT SCIENTIFIC WORKS KAMALDEEP GULATI

28 C.A. No. 827/2011XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersus

UMA KANT AND ORS. VISHNU SHARMA, SUNIL KUMAR VERMA, K.V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

29 C.A. No. 9-12/2011XV

RAJDADIJI SMT. BADAN KANWARMEDICAL TRUST PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][P-RES]

30 C.A. No. 7218/2010III

CIT,AHMEDABAD B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S NIRMA CHEMICAL WORK LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER

31 Crl.A. No. 1441/2009II

CHAD SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHY, MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

32 C.A. No. 6893/2008XVII-A

SHRUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELFAREASSOCIATION GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

Versus

SRI RAM HOUSING FINANCE ANDINVESTMENT AND ORS.

GOPAL PRASAD[R-1], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-5],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-6], BHAKTI VARDHANSINGH[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6894/2008XVII-A

TRIVENI K.S.A.SAMITI LTD. GOPAL PRASAD

VersusSURUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELF.ASSN..AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD

33 C.A. No. 5311/2010XII

M/S SHAW WALLACE GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1], E. R. SUMATHY[R-2]

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

34 C.A. No. 4784/2009XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusC.RAJAMMA AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAMIA No.91490/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION FILED BY MR. ZULFIKER ALIP.S., ADVOCATE.

35 C.A. No. 5863/2011XI-A

SUNIL KUMAR DASS(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.Versus

REV. DIV. COMMNR.,CENTRAL DIV., .AND ORS.

SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY, UTTARABABBAR, RAJESH SRIVASTAVA, SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5864/2011XI-A

PRABIR ROY CHOWDHURY(DEAD) THR.LRS. UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]

VersusTHE REVENUE DIVISIONCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL DIVISIONAND ORS.

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY[R-1], SIBOSANKAR MISHRA[R-1], RAJESHSRIVASTAVA[R-1]

36 C.A. No. 10306/2016XVI

SHANKAR PRASAD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTAVersusRAMANUJ PRASAD(D) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [R-3]

37 C.A. No. 8967/2012III-A

DEVI PRASAD NAVIN PRAKASH[P-1]VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD (D) THR. LRS..AND ORS.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1.1.1],[R-1.1.6], [R-1.1.5], [R-1.1.4], [R-1.1.3], [R-1.1.2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8970/2012III-A

GIRI (D) TH. LRS. AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE

VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, NAVINPRAKASH[R-16]

38 C.A. No.7008-7009/2011XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusP.V.JAYASANKER . AND ORS.

39 C.A. No. 3047/2010XVII-A

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING RACHANA JOSHI ISSARVersusGURCHARAN SINGH GILL AND ANR.and IA No.102846/2017-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS ANDGROUNDS

40 C.A. No. 2024/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONERTANJOREMUNICIPALITY R. V. KAMESHWARAN

VersusB.GUNASEKARAN AND ORS. AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

41 C.A. No. 5877/2009IV-A

T.BALAKRISHNAM NAIDU (D) BY L.RS. DEVASA & CO., [P-1], [P-3], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[P-2]

VersusR. MUNIRAJU AND ANR. S. N. BHAT, [R-1], SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

42 C.A. No. 7219/2009IX

THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING MINISTRYOF URBAN AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusUDAY JAMBAWALIKAR ABHA R. SHARMAIA No.20232/2018

43 C.A. No.3291-3294/2009XV

THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedDiary No. 45834-2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER, KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 15825/2019 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA15827/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 15829/2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24841/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA151225/2019

ConnectedDiary No. 4078-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIAIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 26889/2018 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 26892/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 4085-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURMANAGERIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33950/2018 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA33951/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 33953/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8968/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA (EARLIER STATEBANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR)FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA36656/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 25465-2018IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER KAVITA JHA[R-1], [R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 97018/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA97019/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28657/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.175771/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.175773/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.175772/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 1045-2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDCB BANK LTD.IA No.11736/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.11737/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4843/2020IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ICICI BANK LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.22204/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.22205/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

44 Crl.A. No. 1201/2010II-B

NAND KISHORE @ BALLI . AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, RISHI MALHOTRA,CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1210/2010II-B

SANJAY @ PAPU BINAY KUMAR DAS

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

45 Crl.A. No. 431/2009II-B

BIKKAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE, [R-1]

46 Crl.A. No.586-589/2009II-C

S.MADHU B. S. BANTHIA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHYFOR ON IA 90855/2008

47 Crl.A. No. 1298/2009II-C

P.C.SRIVASTAVA VISHNU SHARMAVersusLALIT MADHAN KUSUM CHAUDHARY

48 Crl.A. No. 1319/2010II-C

SEKAR(DEAD) VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THEINSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

49 C.A. No. 4973/2011III-A

PARVATI DEVI SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], RAKESHUTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SATISH KUMAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4975/2011III-A

NON-FORMALEDU.INSTR.SUPERV.WEL.ASSO. SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SHAIL KUMAR DWIVEDI[I-1][IMPL],RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, [I-2][IMPL],ALOK SHUKLA[I-3][IMPL]

FOR FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SY] ON IA3/2012 FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. ALOK SHUKLA] ON IA5/2013 FOR ON IA 6/2013 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 2/2011 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 8/2016 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 9/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATIONON IA 10/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 11/2017 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 12/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 13/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 14/2017 FORimpleading party ON IA 40592/2017 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA40592/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2011III-A

PANKAJ DUBEY AND ORS.DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10],[P-11], [P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15]

Versus

REKHA AND ORS.P. I. JOSE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-15], [R-13], [R-14],[R-16], [R-17]

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 450 C.A. No. 6937/2008

XVII-AS.K.JAIN TEJAS PATEL[P-1]VersusKAMLESH GUPTA . AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR[R-1]

51 Crl.A. No. 135/2009II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGHVersus

SURINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDHIR MENDIRATTA, ARVIND GUPTA[R-1],[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

52 C.A. No.10201-10202/2010XI-A

M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCELTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCOCHIN

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]A. RAGHUNATH[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4903/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCH.AND LES. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4907/2014XI-A

M/S VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASEP.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4906/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURC. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4905/2014XI-A

M/S.MULAMOOTTIL LEASING E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX A. N. ARORA, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4904/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCO.P.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10204/2010XI-A

ART LEASING LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10203/2010XI-A

M/S.KERALA STATE FINANCIALENTERPRISES LTD. V. K. MONGA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHRISSUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.10205-10206/2010XI-A

M/S BELL LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE (P) LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10207/2010XI-A

M/S RIGHT LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE CO. P. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4441/2011XI-A

M/S ROYAL HIRE PURCHASE(P) LTD. A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6388/2013XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-ICHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTVS FINANCE AND SERVICES LTD. RADHA RANGASWAMY

53 Crl.A. No. 2300/2009II-A

BALARAM AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

54 Crl.A. No. 1055/2010II-C

S. SHANKAR @ SHIVASHANKAR RAJEEV SINGHVersusH.B. PRAKASHMUMAR JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.

55 Crl.A. No. 1631/2008II-B

MADAN LAL SHARMA SANJAY JAINVersusPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

56 C.A. No.6915-6916/2008IX

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD) BYLRS. K. N. RAI, ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSAYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDARETC.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4116/2012IX

SAYYED SAJIT HUSSAINI (DEAD)THROUGH LRS SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.6311-6312/2013III

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD)THROUGH ITS TRUSTEES ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDAR &ORS.

J. P. DHANDA[R-1], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

57 C.A. No. 8694/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMANGLAM RICINUS LTD. GEETANJALI MOHAN[R-1]

58 Crl.A. No. 1725/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1726/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

59 Crl.A. No. 804/2011II-B

RAM PARTAP NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]

60 C.A. No. 1956/2011III

C.I.T,AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYARVersusASHOK SHANTILAL SHAH MANISHA T. KARIA

61 Crl.A. No.2247-2248/2009II-C

HARSHA ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

62 C.A. No. 6746/2012XI-A

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ANDORS. AJIT PUDUSSERY

Versus

G.S.RAJU AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN, P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH,BINA MADHAVAN

63 C.A. No. 7899/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RESEARCHSOC. . AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIFOR ON IA 26062/2009 FOR DISPENSING WITH SERVICE OF NOTICE ON IA1/2009

ConnectedC.A. No. 7900/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RES.SOCIETY .AND ANR. PAREKH & CO., CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA

64 C.A. No. 9994/2011III-A

U.P.PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHRISH KUMAR MISRA[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ANKIT GOEL[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9995/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH SECRETARY ANKUR PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-6]

65 C.A. No. 6377/2009XVII-A

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA J S WAD AND COVersusMANBAI NANJI BHUDIA

66 Crl.A. No. 1564/2009II-A

MANJIT SINGH KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND MUKTI CHAUDHRY[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 288/2013II-C

SURINDER GROVER KUSUM CHAUDHARY

VersusSTATE OF(NCT OF DELHI) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

67 C.A. No.5465-5468/2011XVII-A

M/S. INCON ENGINEERS LIMITED ANDANR. NIRAJ GUPTA

VersusSHRI M.A.MUNVARASEEM . AND ORS.

68 C.A. No. 1720/2010XII

N.CHELLAPPA GURUKKAL S. GOWTHAMAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYSDEPARTMENT AND ORS. REP. BY CHIEFENGINEER

T. HARISH KUMAR, VINODH KANNA B.[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], P. SOMA SUNDARAM, B. BALAJI

69 C.A. No.1858-1859/2016XII

NAGABHUSHANAMMAL (D) THRU LRS VIJAY KUMAR

VersusC.CHANDIKESWARALINGAM K. K. MOHAN

70 C.A. No. 5241/2009XVII-A

JAI SHREE MINE PRODUCTS P.LTD. RAJIV MEHTAVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.. ANDANR. MANJEET CHAWLA

71 Crl.A. No. 840/2009II-C

M.K.MALBOOL KHAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

72 C.A. No. 8347/2009XVII-A

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER

VersusSUPREME SECURITIES SERVICES LTD.

73 C.A. No. 6353/2012XII

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusASST.PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ANR. DIVYA ROY[R-1]

74 C.A. No. 4461/2010XVII-A

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, H.U.D.A. . ANDANR. NARESH BAKSHI

VersusCAPT. A.C.MOHAN GEETANJALI MOHAN

75 C.A. No. 4070/2009XVII-A

M/S.PREMIER TRANSPORT LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCECO.LTD..THROUGH ITS REGIONALMANAGER AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL, AJAY CHOUDHARY

76 C.A. No. 5726/2009XVII-A

M/S KIRAN OVERSEAS EXPORTS LTD.VersusTHAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[R-1]

77 C.A. No. 5081/2011XV

COMMR.KVS AND ORS. S. RAJAPPAVersusSURENDRA KUMAR VINEET BHAGAT

ConnectedDiary No. 28290-2017XV

SURENDRA KUMAR MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYASANGATHAN AND ORS.IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 92642/2017

78 C.A. No. 7575/2011XVII-A

HARYANA URBAN DEVT. AUTH0RITYETC. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusARJUN SINGH SENGER B. K. SATIJA

79 C.A. No. 2518/2012XIV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusP. ZADENGA DEEPAK GOEL[R-1]

80 C.A. No. 7693/2009XVII-A

MUKHTIAR KAUR CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULIVersusL.I.C.OF INDIA . AND ANR. INDRA SAWHNEY

81 C.A. No. 8154/2009XVII-A

REGISTRAR, KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY ANKUR S. KULKARNIVersusSIRIN H MAKANDAR ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2009

82 C.A. No. 5426/2010IV-A

CHANNABASAPPA GAVISIDDAPPAMATTUR AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE

VersusHANUMAPPA NAREGALLAPPA MATTURAND ORS. S. N. BHAT, SHANKAR DIVATE, ANIL KUMAR

83 C.A. No. 2178/2011XIV-A

MD.ABDUL RAHIM AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEEVersusMANAGEMENT OF CACHAR PAPERMILL SHEKHAR KUMAR

84 C.A. No. 7166/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATESVersus

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4TAJBIR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7191/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusRAJINDER SINGH . AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7199/2010IV

MOHD. FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusMANSA RAM R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7168/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusBALDEVA (D) THR LRS . R. C. KAUSHIK

85 C.A. No.1120-1121/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusKARAM CHAND AND ORS. ANIL NAG[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

86 C.A. No. 2825/2010XVII-A

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusMAL SINGH

87 C.A. No. 88/2012XII

THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusDEPUTY CHIEF INSPECTOR OFFACTORIES AND ANR. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

88 C.A. No. 3589/2010IV

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusPARDUMAN SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI, [R-1]ORIGINAL RECORD IN THE MATTER RECEIVED.

89 C.A. No.2463-2464/2011III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusBRINDABAN . AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRAs per order dated 15.02.2019 passed in I.A. No. 40272/2018 in C.A. No. 2468/2011

ConnectedC.A. No. 2468/2011III-A

BRINDABAN TR.B.M.SANGH ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusM/S HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD..AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA

90 Crl.A. No.1384-1385/2009II-A

RANVIR SINGH . AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 700/2011II-A

SARDAR SINGH SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]and FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 55313/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 55315/2017

91 C.A. No. 24/2013III

BHARTIBEN CHANDRAKANTBHAITHAKOR NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

92 C.A. No.3913-3931/2011XI-A

A.GIJI PAUL AND ANR ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS ETCNISHE RAJEN SHONKER, SUMITA HAZARIKA,M. T. GEORGE, G. PRAKASH, A. VENAYAGAMBALAN

I.A. NOS. 1-19 OF 2010 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION93 Crl.A. No. 524/2010

II-AGULAM WAHID AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSEOFFICER

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

94 Crl.A. No. 1868/2009II

SRI ASHISH BHUTANI AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1869/2009II

SRI PREETOM SAIKIA K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1867/2009II

GUNA TAMULY PHUKAN KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

VersusDR. ASHISH BHUTANI . AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]FOR EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING ON IA 16760/2009

95 C.A. No. 8516/2011IX

UCO BANK AND ORS. RAJESH SINGHVersusM.B.MOTWANI (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

96 Crl.A. No. 396/2010II-B

PHULEL SINGH T. L. GARGVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

97 C.A. No. 7227/2010XII

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERARTHANAREESWARAR TEMPLE M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]

VersusR.SATHYAMOORTHY AND ORS ANDORS.

SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1],VINODH KANNA B.[R-21]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7228/2010XII

THE COMMISSIONER HINDURELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLEENDOWMENTS

VINODH KANNA B.[P-1]

VersusR SATHYAMOORTHY ANDORS AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10475/2010XII

K.M. ELANGOVAN . AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

R. RUKMANI . AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-14]

ONLY IA NO FOR RECTIFICATION OF COURTS ORDER TO BE LISTED IN CA NO10475/10 FOR [Appl. seeking rectification of order dt. 3.12.2010] ON IA115218/2014

98 C.A. No. 1870/2010XII

NACHIMUTHU MUDALIAR DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusG. V. ANANTHAPADMANABHAN ANDORS. AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

99 C.A. No. 2187/2011IV-A

MOHAMMED KHALEEL (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS.

SUKANT VIKRAM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusJAYAMMA P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4100 C.A. No. 9261/2014

III-ASHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]Versus

U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THR.ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-4], SATPALSINGH[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

101 C.A. No. 5688/2012XII-A

K.JAYASEKHAR D. BHARATHI REDDY[P-1]VersusSECY. TO GOVT.AGRL AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1], [R-2]

102 C.A. No. 5038/2012IX

RAM @ RAMDAS SHESHRAO NEHARKAR ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA IIVersusSHESHRAO BABURAO NEHARKAR . ANDORS.

103 C.A. No.3370-3371/2012XII

G.SHANMUGAM (D) BY LRS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.HR & CE (ADMN) DEPT.. ANDORS. R. N. KESWANI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-1]

104 C.A. No.9030-9031/2014XII

A.PARVATHY MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusBHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY AND ANR. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

105 C.A. No. 7395/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRAVersus

M/S. TARA CHAND SHAM LAL AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7396/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. PURAN CHAND ASHWANI KUMARAND ORS.

K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7403/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S HANSRAJ TARSEM CHAND ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7405/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BADRI DASS CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7404/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S NEW PUNJAB TRADERS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7411/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BADRI PARSHAD BANARASI DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7413/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusJAI DURGA TRADING COMPANY ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7416/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4M/S KESHO RAM AND BROTHERS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7412/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA TRADING COMPANY . ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7415/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SHAM LAL AND SONS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7400/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S ATMA RAM CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7398/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. SATDEV HARIRAM AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7407/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S JAI JAGDAMBE RICE MILLS K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7408/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S AMBAY RICE MILLS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7399/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BABU RAM CHARNJIT AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7397/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. RAMA FOODS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7409/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA RICE MILLS AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7410/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SEHAJ RAM RAM KISHAN DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7401/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S GARG TRADING CO. AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SATPAL RAJKUMAR INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7402/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD CHANDIGARHAND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4M/S RAVINDERJEET SINGH RAJINDERKUMAR AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedDiary No. 8741-2019IV-B

PUNJAB STATE AGRICULTURALMARKETING BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BANSAL RICE FACTORY AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.52678/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.52682/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

106 Crl.A. No. 789/2011II-C

AMAR (MINOR) THR.LEGALGUARD.MOTHER AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

VersusCHATURBHUJ MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ

107 C.A. No. 283/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (BASIC)AND ORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

SMT. SUSHILA SRIVASTAVA . AND ORS. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1], [R-2], [R-8],[INT], [IMPL], JITENDRA KUMAR[R-9]

108 Crl.A. No. 1730/2015II-C

PARDESHI RAM SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF M.P.(NOW CHHATTISGARH) SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

109 C.A. No. 10345/2011XI-A

M/S.ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN. LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusRADHESHYAM BARIK (DEAD) AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10344/2011XI-A

M/S. ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN.LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusAKRURA DHURUA . AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

110 C.A. No. 78/2018XII

SONITHA KALLAT E. M. S. ANAMVersus

RAJARAM KALLAT AND ORS AND ORS.M. P. VINOD, [R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], JAMES P.THOMAS[R-12][PR]

111 C.A. No. 3102/2016IV

HARDEEP SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

112 Crl.A. No. 1676/2011II

MAHBOOB AND ORS. S. S. NEHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)AND ANR.

JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1], SANJAYKUMAR DUBEY[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 784/2013II

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusAKBAR . AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI, SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 783/2013II

MANSAB SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY[P-1][PR]

Versus

AKBAR SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], NARESHBAKSHI[R-1], JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1]

113 C.A. No. 5177/2012III-A

M/S. SAYA TRADERS ANAND MISHRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHFINANCE AND REVENUE AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedDiary No. 14076-2020XI

RAJENDRA ISPAT PVT. LTD. PARUL SHUKLA

Versus

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 61873/2020 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 61876/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 61877/2020

114 C.A. No. 8624/2014XII

KASTHURI AND ANR. AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusS.M. SIVASWAMI AND ORS. AND ORS. T. HARISH KUMAR

115 C.A. No. 8329/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusINDIAN NAVY CIVILIAN DESIGNOFFICERS ASSOCIATION THROUGHSHRI SWAPAN DEB AND ANR.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

IA No.3 (D.no.20220/12) to be listed along with Main matter116 C.A. No. 6793/2013

III-AALLAHABAD BANK AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]VersusSECRETARY ALLAHABAD BANK TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN, [R-1]

117 Crl.A. No. 1264/2011II-C

DHASIM @ MOHAMMAD DHASIM A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 4853/2016II-C

SYED ALI AND ANR. ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

FOR FOR ON IA 112952/2017118 C.A. No. 471/2016

XI-AN.K. SASIDHARAN . AND ANR. G. PRAKASHVersusM/S. NELLIAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.921/2017 In SLP(C) No.13460/2016XI-A

NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS ANDORS. USHA NANDINI. V

Versus

L. CHANDRASEKHARAN G. PRAKASH[R-3]and IA No.28211/2018-I.A. FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE andIA No.28212/2018-I.A FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13460/2016XI-A

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTSAND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusNELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS USHA NANDINI. VFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2017 FOR [IA FOR VACATINGTHE INTERIM ORDER] ON IA 36978/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA 42831/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 42833/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 472/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusM/S NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V, RENJITH. B

FOR ON IA 6/2016119 C.A. No. 7661/2011

XII-ADG CSIR AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersus

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4D. ATCHUTA RAO KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

120 C.A. No. 5517/2012IV-A

SYNDICATE BANK RAJIV NANDAVersusB GANESH PAI MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJAT THE TOP OF THE HEARING MATTERS.

121 C.A. No. 7236/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusVINAYAK SHANKAR CHATURVEDI S. C. BIRLA[R-1]

122 Crl.A. No. 1288/2012II-C

RAVISHANKAR @ SHISHUPAL JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VMZ CHAMBERS[R-1][GR]Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. is appointed as AC for the petitioner

123 C.A. No. 1944/2015III

MOHAN AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDE[P-1]Versus

KALYAN AND ORS.ANISH R. SHAH[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-6], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE[R-3],[R-4]

124 Crl.A. No. 748/2012II-C

STATE OF KARNATAKA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusB.T.RAMESH RAJESH MAHALE

125 Crl.A. No. 460/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusJANVED SINGH ANIL SHRIVASTAV

126 C.A. No. 9746/2011XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS.PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], UMANG SHANKAR[R-4]SANDEEP JINDAL[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9747/2011XIV-A

ANURAG SHARMA AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[P-1], RAMJEE PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-2], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

127 Crl.A. No. 124/2015II-A

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusBHAGWAN PRASAD GAURAV AGRAWAL

128 C.A. No. 7546/2012XVII-A

ASHUTOSH SANJAY KUMAR TYAGIVersusRAJPUT GUN SERVICE(FAC)REVA SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL

129 C.A. No. 9696/2011XVII-A

CHAIRMAN KISAN SAHKARI CHINIMILLS LTD. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusPOST MASTER GENERAL BAREILLY .AND ORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

130 C.A. No. 10853/2014XVII

KAMLA GANGOLI PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEPARTMENT OF URBANDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BUILDINGTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

MUKTI CHAUDHRY[R-1], GOPAL PRASAD[R-4]

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4131 C.A. No.

6827-6828/2014IV

RAKESH KUMAR CHOPRA SANTOSH MISHRA

Versus

NARINDER KUMAR . AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA, JYOTI MENDIRATTA, GAURAVDHINGRA, (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

132 Crl.A. No. 245/2013II

KANAHAIYA SHILPA SINGHVersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (NOWUTTARAKHAND) SAURABH TRIVEDI

133 C.A. No. 10317/2011XVII-A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. PRAMIT SAXENA[P-1]VersusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2025/2012XVII-A

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP.LTD. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

VersusUNITED INDIA INS.CO.LTD.

134 Crl.A. No. 1795/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]Versus

SAU GITA AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-4]

135 C.A. No.11389-11392/2011XII

S.ASOKAN G. BALAJI

VersusE.DHARMAN ETC.ETC. ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYINTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 127847 OF 2017- APPLICATION FORDIRECTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 18.2.2016

136 C.A. No. 4612/2013III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]VersusSURESH PAL SINGH R. C. KAUSHIK[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29491/2012XI

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAI PRAKASH (DEAD) THR. LRS. @ JAIPRAKASH KHANNA

137 C.A. No. 804-806/2013XIV-A

MR. KEZHOLEL RHETSO JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS. N. ANNAPOORANI, ASHOK KUMARSINGH[R-5], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 807/2013XIV-A

TOBA ANGAMI SOMANATHA PADHAN[P-1], [P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1], SRIDHARPOTARAJU[R-3], ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-5],[R-9]

138 Crl.A. No. 681/2012II

TARSEM @ SEMA @ JAGGA SANDEEP NARAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

139 C.A. No. 3773/2015XI-A

C.GIRIJA AND ORS. AMIT SHARMAVersusV.N.MATHUR AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, A. RAGHUNATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 103-107/2016XI-A

CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS.ETC. ETC. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusP.K. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI ANDANR. ETC. ETC. AND ANR. VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R, A. RAGHUNATH

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 80649/2019

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4140 Crl.A. No.

1518-1519/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

Versus

RAJENDRA P. N. RAMALINGAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

141 Crl.A. No. 1287/2012II

BADAL DEB JAVED MAHMUD RAO[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA NIDHI[R-1][GR]

142 Crl.A. No.2205-2206/2011II-C

DEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE ANU GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

RAJESH & ANR ETC. AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2312/2011II-C

RAJESH RAJESH MAHALE

VersusDEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE AND ORS. ANU GUPTA

143 Crl.A. No. 442/2013II

MOHAN KISHORI JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]Mr. Radha Krishna Kumar, Advocate has been appointed as amicus curiae in theinstant matter.

144 Crl.A. No. 190/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusUDAYVEER SINGH KUSWAHA SANJAY K. AGRAWAL

145 Crl.A. No. 72/2013II-A

STATE THROUGH SPE, CBI, PATNA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusMANKESHWAR SINGH T. MAHIPALMs. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate (A.C.) for Respondent Accused

146 Crl.A. No. 2432/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNARESH AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], [R-2]

147 C.A. No. 10992/2013IV

HARNEK SINGH . AND ANR. AWANISH SINHAVersusGRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. SHOMILA BAKSHI[CAVEAT]

148 Crl.A. No. 1661/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusHEMRAJ AND ANR. MINAKSHI VIJ[R-2]

149 C.A. No. 7824/2013III-A

OM PRAKASH UPADHYAY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[P-1]Versus

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2], [R-3]

150 C.A. No. 6649/2013III-A

SARLA KUMARI (D) THR. LR. ANKUR YADAV[P-1]VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6650/2013III-A

AJAI KUMAR AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6651/2013III-A

ANURADHA AGARWAL AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 6652/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6653/2013III-A

ADARSH KUMAR . AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6655/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGHAL NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6654/2013III-A

RAJIV KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

151 C.A. No. 4859/2014XVI

BALESHWAR RAI AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRAVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

152 C.A. No. 7694/2013XVII-A

THE ORIENTAL INS. COMPANY LTD.KADAPA BRANCH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusK. NARASIMHA REDDY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

153 C.A. No.4531-4533/2013XVII-A

NAVJIVAN ROLLER FLOUR AND PULSEMILLS LTD (THROUGH EXCUTIVEDIRECTOR)

BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTDTHROUGH THE CHAIRMAN GAURAV SHARMA

FOR ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 16888/2013

154 C.A. No.4053-4069/2014XIV-A

SHANKER TRADING (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4189/2019XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONSPVT. LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA[CAVEAT]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 14104/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 4072/2014XIV-A

SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEM THR.FINANCE DIRECTOR MR. YOSHIHISAMIZUNO

KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIIN.D. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16277/2014XII

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CHENNAI V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24756/2014XII

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX COMPANY CIRCLE-V(2) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.PENTASOFT TECHNOLOGIESLTD.(PAN AAACP1895R) THROUGH ITSM.D

K J JOHN AND CO

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(C) No. 719/2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPIRAMAL GLASS LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.193114/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.193115/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1157/2020XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENTSERVICE PVT LTD RAJAT MITTAL[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

155 Crl.A. No. 1957/2013II

TARSEM KAUR AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1][PR], RAJKAMAL[P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]For final disposal.

156 C.A. No. 9146/2012XIV-A

SULTAN SINGH AND ORS.VersusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

ANIRUDH SHARMA, RAJEEVSHARMA[CAVEAT]

NAMES OF THE APPELLANTS AS PER ORDER DATED 25.02.2019 ARE : SH.SULTAN SINGH, SH. RAMESHWAR, SMT. SANTOSH, SH SANDEEP, SH PANKAJ,MS. GEETA, JAI BHAGWAN, SH. OM PRAKASH, SH MANOHAR, SH UMED SINGH,MS SUMAN, MS SHEETAL, SH SUMIT AND SH DEEPAK

157 Crl.A. No. 122/2013II

VIJAYA SINGH AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

158 C.A. No. 8762/2012IV-A

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. SIDDHARTH[P-1]

VersusDODDABALLAPUR SPINNING MILLSPRIVATE LIMITED

159 Crl.A. No. 972/2013II

JABIR AND ORS. VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1][GR]

160 Crl.A. No. 2269/2014II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AJAY CHOUDHARY, MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusRAM MURTI

161 C.A. No. 1001/2013III

CHANDRAKANT(DEAD) THR. LRS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]VersusSITALSINGH ASARAM NAIK . AND ORS. ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH[R-1]

162 C.A. No. 8954/2013IV-A

R. VENKATESH SHAILESH MADIYALVersusT.UMA DEVI RAJESH MAHALE[CAVEAT]

163 C.A. No.4337-4338/2013IV-A

PROTYUSH CHATTERJEE AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

VersusSUPER AUTO FORGE PRIVATE LIMITEDAND ANR. DIKSHA RAI

164 C.A. No.9697-9698/2014III-A

HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA . AND ORS. SATPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER ANDANR.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2]

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4165 Crl.A. No. 377/2015

II-CSURESH @ NAINA SURESH S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2015II-C

SARAVANAN @ KILANGU SARAVANANAND ANR. S. GOWTHAMAN, [P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

166 Crl.A. No. 2049/2014II-C

FULESHWARI BAI JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 18504/2014MR. VIJAY KUMAR L. PARDESHI ,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

167 C.A. No. 9457/2013III-A

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPRTCORPORATION THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusAMAR DAS V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[R-1]

168 C.A. No. 7323/2016XIV-A

MIZORAM UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASADVersusDR.LALROKIMA CHENKUAL AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7291/2016XII-A

N.C.H. VARADARAJU SATISH KUMAR

VersusTHE GOVERNMENT OF A.P REP. BY ITSPRL SECRETARY FOR HIGH EDUCATIONAND ORS.

T. V. RATNAM, ANJANI AIYAGARI, VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

169 C.A. No. 6944/2015XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR. SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]VersusORISSA KHADI AND VILLAGEINDUSTRIES BOARD KARMACHARISANGHA AND ANR.

KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[CAVEAT], G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], V. K.VERMA[R-2]

170 C.A. No. 10658/2016IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusRADHELAL GOUD

171 C.A. No. 10612/2013IV

BALBIR SINGH AND ORS. YADAV NARENDER SINGH[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-2], SATISHKUMAR[R-5], [R-7], [R-8], SHREE PALSINGH[R-9]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8607/2014IV

KULJIT SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-1], MANJUJETLEY[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-11], [R-12]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.27779-27780/2016IV-B

GURPARTAP SINGH ETC. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

172 Crl.A. No. 62-63/2014II-A

ANOKHILAL K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4173 Crl.A. No. 2567/2014

II-CCHEETRAM JAIL PETITIONVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHTHE NAME OF MS. SAVITRI PANDEY, ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUSCURIAE

174 C.A. No. 10827/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusMD. BARKAT HUSSAIN T. MAHIPAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 10831/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

VersusDEEPAK KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL

175 Crl.A. No. 1805/2014II-B

VINODBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR PREETI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

176 Crl.A. No. 301/2014II-B

SURAJMAL (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

177 Crl.A. No.132-133/2017II

STATE OF U.P. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusAJMAL BEG ETC. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]

178 C.A. No.8447-8448/2014XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJEEV SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusNAYEEMA AHMAD SHAKIL AHMED SYED

179 C.A. No. 7177/2015XII-A

M/S.NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS ANNAM D. N. RAOVersusM/S.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.AND ORS.

TATINI BASU, RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA,GAURAV SHARMA, AJAY PAL

180 C.A. No. 11382/2016IV

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MILKPLANT BATHINDA DEVVRAT

VersusDALIP SINGH AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

181 Crl.A. No. 1615/2019II-C

MUNU SEN VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]

182 C.A. No. 3000/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYARVersusSHRI SWARAN SINGH SAMPLA BALRAJ DEWAN

183 C.A. No. 5921/2015XII-A

METPALLI LASUM BAI SINCE DEAD GUNTUR PRABHAKARVersusMETPALLI MUTHAIAH(D) BY LRS ANDORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5922/2015XII-A

METPALLI MUTHAIAH (D) BY LRS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusMETPALLI LASUM BAI (DEAD) BY LRS .AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

IA

184 C.A. No. 7220/2015XII

UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIAUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI

VersusNOORAJAHAN SATYA MITRA GARG[CAVEAT]

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4185 C.A. No. 12147/2017

XVITHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusTHE ORGANIZER DEHRI C.D. AND C.M.UNION LTD. AND ORS. KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[R-2], [R-3]

186 C.A. No. 6328/2014XVII

M/S DLF LIMITED ABHAY KUMARVersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. ARJUN KRISHNAN, ABHINAV MUKERJI

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6487/2014XVII

M/S DLF LIMITED AND ANR. ABHAY KUMAR[P-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], TATINI BASU[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 19947/2017XVII

DLF HOME DEVELOPER LTD. (MERGEDWITH DLF NEW HOME DEVELOPERSPVT. LTD.)

ABHAY KUMAR

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIASECRETARY AND ANR. ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.78167/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 6481/2014XVII

M/S DLF LIMITED ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA .AND ORS.

ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-1], ABHINAVMUKERJI[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR ON IA 3/2014 FOR ON IA 4/2014ConnectedC.A. No.8014-8023/2014XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ARJUN KRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

M/S DLF LTD AND ORS.ABHAY KUMAR[R-1], RAJESH MAHALE[R-4],TATINI BASU[R-6], D. K. DEVESH[R-11], [R-12],GAURAV KEJRIWAL[R-13], SUMITKUMAR[R-14]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 9868/2014XVII

MAGNOLIAS FLAT OWNERS ASSO. TATINI BASU[P-1]

Versus

M/S DLF LTD AND ORS. ABHAY KUMAR[R-1], ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-2],MONIKA GUSAIN[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 2/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 11109/2014XVII

D L F PARK PLACE RESIDENTSWELFARE ASSO. ABHINAV MUKERJI, ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusM/S DLF LTD . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, ABHAY KUMAR{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 11108/2014XVII

BELAIRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION ABHINAV MUKERJI

Versus

DLF LTD . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, ARJUN KRISHNAN, ABHAYKUMAR

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR ON IA 3/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 10540/2014XVII

PUSHKAR DATT SHARMA . AND ORS. TATINI BASU

Versus

M/S DLF LTD. . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, , ARJUN KRISHNAN, ABHAYKUMAR

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 2532/2016XVII

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD. ABHAY KUMAR

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. HIMANSHU SHEKHAR, ARJUN KRISHNAN

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 }ConnectedC.A. No. 2523/2016XVII

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD. ABHAY KUMAR

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAR-1 AND ANR. ARJUN KRISHNAN

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 19945/2017XVII

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LIMITED ANDANR. ABHAY KUMAR

VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 } IA No.78625/2017-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

187 C.A. No. 20830/2017IV-A

PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES(PUCL) THROUGH ITS GENERALSECRETARY AND ANR.

PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUMEER SODHI[R-2]

188 C.A. No. 20918/2017XII-A

M. LUCY RANI AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusSIDDABOINA LAXMINARAYANA . ANDORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[CAVEAT]

189 C.A. No. 3801/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL . AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3802/2017XIV-A

HAMDARD EDUCATION SOCIETY ANDANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusSHRI ABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3803/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI

VersusNAUMAN AHMAD KHAN MAHUA KALRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7737/2018XIV

VARINDER KAUR V. ELANCHEZHIYAN

VersusSCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURUHARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL ANDORS.

ABINASH KUMAR MISHRA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.41869/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.41870/2018-DELETING THE NAME OF RESPONDENT

190 Crl.A. No. 721/2015II

VIJAI BANKEY BIHARI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1]and IA No.16196/2018-SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE/BAIL

191 Crl.A. No. 2460/2014II-B

PARKASH CHAND SHREE PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4

192 C.A. No. 827-828/2018XVII

THE WORKMEN BEING REP. BY THESECRETARY BIHAR COLLIERY KAMGARUNION

ANUP KUMAR[P-1]

VersusEMPLOYER IN RELATION OF THEMANAGEMENT OF BHAGABANDCOLLIERY OF M/S. BHARAT COKINGCOAL LTD.

NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 }

193 C.A. No. 2150/2015XVII-A

M/S DLF UNIVERSAL LTD FORMERLYKNOWN AS DLF COMMERICALCOMPLEXES LTD

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusKUSHAL K RANA BANKEY BIHARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5858/2015XVII-A

ROHIT CHAUDHARYAND . AND ANR. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusM/S. VIPUL LTD. M. R. SHAMSHADIA No.121933/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22949/2017XVII-A

EMAAR MGF LAND LTD AND ANR. P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusCHANBIR SINGH MANN AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1], [R-2]IA No.47176/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.47177/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.79678/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

194 Crl.A. No. 2485/2014II-C

RADHEY SHYAM B. SRIDHARVersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

195 C.A. No. 3390/2017XIV-A

KURMA RAO M M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

196 C.A. No. 8424/2015XI-A

STATE OF ODISHA . AND ORS. ANINDITA PUJARIVersus

BIJAY KUMAR NANDA . AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN, DIPESH SINHA[R-11]

197 Crl.A. No.1030-1031/2017II-A

RAJA MISHRA @ RAJA RAM MISHRAAND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]ABHISHEK SINGH[I-1][IMPL]

198 C.A. No. 1663/2015III

ARUN EKNATH PAGARE AND ORS. APARNA JHA[P-1]VersusLAXMIBAI BHASKAR DHANRAO . ANDORS. SRM LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1]

199 Crl.A. No. 391/2015II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SATISH KUMAR[P-1][GR]VersusPANKAJ KUMAR KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1][PR], [R-1]

200 C.A. No. 2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.[P-1]VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[R-1], G. BALAJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3090/2015XII

KALYANA SUNDARI R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS. G. BALAJI[R-1]

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.640/2015 In C.A. No.2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.

Versus

LAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS.

201 C.A. No. 959/2017III

SHAIKH SALEEMUDDIN AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBEVersus

BABA QUERASHI AND ANR. SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR,SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2]

202 C.A. No. 3673/2015XVII-A

M/S SUPER LABEL MFG. CO. AP & J CHAMBERSVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

203 Crl.A. No.602-603/2017II-A

DR. GANESH JAGANNATH DHUMAL RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[P-1]

VersusSANDEEP SHRIRAM GUPTA AND ANR. R. P. GUPTA[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]

204 C.A. No. 7228/2015XVII-A

HIND OFFSHORE PVT. LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusIFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECO. LTD TATINI BASU[R-1]

205 C.A. No.5502-5503/2017III

PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORYPROCESS TO BE SERVED THR.DIRECTOR AND ANR.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusN.K. SHAH . AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[CAVEAT]

206 C.A. No. 2674/2016XVI

SHASHI BHUSHAN MUKESH RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARYVersusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANDORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

207 C.A. No. 531-535/2016III-A

U.P FOREST CORPORATION KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. VISHNU SHARMA, ANIL KATIYAR

208 C.A. No.6608-6609/2016XII

ANIMILLI ATCHIYAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITYPONDICHERRY AND ORS BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1]

209 C.A. No. 6359/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]VersusVINAY KUMAR SYED MEHDI IMAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7234/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusSANTOSH WADHWA, SCIENTIST-E . ANDORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 2575/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusIQBAL HASAN AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29605/2018IV-B

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusKRISHAN LAL

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152134/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

210 C.A. No. 4400/2016XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

SHASHI KANTAVISHAL ARUN[IMPL], PRAVEENAGRAWAL[R-1], AKSHAY VERMA[R-1]AJAY MARWAH[IMPL]

211 C.A. No. 10132/2016XVII-A

AVAS AYUKT, U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKASPARISHAD . AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA KUNDAN KUMAR LAL

212 C.A. No. 8226/2016XIV-A

SHIV PRAKASH SAXENA . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., GAURAV AGRAWALVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA[R-4], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.16367-16369/2017XII

N. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN EXPORT INSPN COUNCIL .AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 149272/2018ConnectedC.A. No.16364-16366/2017XII

N.KALYANARAMAN AND ORS. AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN OF THE EXPORTINSPECTION COUNCIL AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA, K. R. NAMBIAR[IMPL][PR]

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 321/2011XVI-A

SUKRITI BHUSHAN ROY MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMERCE AND INDUSTRY AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 323/2011XVI-A

DIPAK BHATTACHARYYA AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4937/2020XIV

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS. RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

213 C.A. No.5339-5341/2016XVI-A

NHPC LTD AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]

Versus

ALL INDIA NHPC DIPLOMA ENGINEERSCOUNCIL AND ANR. ETC.

ASHOK MATHUR, [R-1], [R-11], [R-12], P. D.SHARMA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-9]RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[IMPL]

214 C.A. No. 5994/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR. ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusFAIVELEY TRANSPORT RAILTECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

B. SUNITA RAO, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017List on a non-misc. dayvide court's order dated15.11.2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 5993/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusESCORTS LTD. AND ANR. ANIL SHRIVASTAV

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 5334/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR.

ARJUN KRISHNAN, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA

VersusSTONE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. ASHOK MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.9680-9690/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. SHADAN FARASAT[P-1]

Versus

A.R. POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-3], [R-10],RAJKUMARI BANJU[R-4], [R-5], [R-9], [R-12],RITESH KUMAR[R-8], SHARMILAUPADHYAY[R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.10981-10985/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA RUCHI KOHLI

Versus

M/S. NARENDRA EXPOSIVES LTD. . ANDORS.

215 C.A. No. 2823/2017III

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersusDR. RAMDAS LAXMANRAO KHESAR ANDORS.

SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR, [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

216 C.A. No. 10888/2016XVII

AMARNATH JHA GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND STATE OFJHARKHAND AND ANR THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR.

KAUSHIK PODDAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10891/2016XVII

VIJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 2/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10892/2016XVII

BIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 2/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10889/2016XVII

AJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusINDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 1/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10890/2016XVII

SHASHI KANT VISHWAKARMA GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORSTHROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA2/2016 FOR ON IA 3/2017

217 C.A. No. 7388/2016XVII-A

MADAN MOHAN PANDA SANTOSH KUMAR - IVersusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED GAURAV SHARMA

218 C.A. No. 7327/2016XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]Versus

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4KALYANI SAMANTA (MONDAL) . ANDORS.

RAUF RAHIM[R-1], KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-2],[R-3]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ][ WITHIN FIRST TEN MATTERS ]

219 C.A. No. 3946/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPAVITRA COMMERCIALS LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 33962-2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSSIONER OFINCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKANAIYALAL M SHETHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151376/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

220 C.A. No. 9691/2016III-A

AKHILESH CHANDRA PORWAL @ A.C.PORWAL RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY .AND ORS. RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3]

221 C.A. No. 10800/2016XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], [R-2], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-1], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10799/2016XVI

RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY .AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA . AND ORS.RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], M. SHOEBALAM[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], PRAVEENSWARUP[R-6]

222 C.A. No. 12200/2016III-A

SHRI KRISHNA SINGH AND ANR. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMANRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS.

T. V. GEORGE[R-2], ABHISHEK YADAV[R-6],VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-7], ARVINDKUMAR[R-8], KAUSAR RAZA FARIDI[R-9]

223 Crl.A. No. 2035/2017II-A

KARU MANJHI RANJAN KUMAR[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF BIHAR DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

224 Crl.A. No. 342/2017II-C

SHIV RAM ANIL NAG[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

225 C.A. No.8289-8290/2018XII

A. KARPAGAM KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[P-1]

VersusVPG HOUSING PVT LTD AND ORSTHROUGH DIRECTOR VGP BABUDASAND ORS.

M. P. VINOD[R-1], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-3][GR], RAJESH KUMAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8291/2018XII

V.G.P HOUSING PVT LTD. ABHINAV AGRAWAL[P-1][GR]

VersusTHE LAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK,CHENNAI AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], B. BALAJI[R-1]

226 C.A. No. 434/2017III

SHREE NILKANTH DEVELOPERS SANTOSH KRISHNANVersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

227 Crl.A. No. 5-6/2018II-A

VEERENDRA RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1]

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ][ TOP OF THEBOARD ]

228 C.A. No.11020-11029/2017X

M/S. KOTDWAR STEELS LTD. SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ONIA 21/2017 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 31/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.12190-12198/2016X

M/S. AMRIT VERSHA UDYOG PVT. LTD.DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD. CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2016ConnectedC.A. No. 1/2017X

M/S ARUNA STEEL PVT LTD DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2017

229 Crl.A. No. 462/2019II

SITA RAM AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR],[P-3][PR], [P-4][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

230 C.A. No. 10753/2017XII

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT, HOME SC DEPARTMENTAND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusY JOHN NICHOLSON, I.P.S. AND ORS. B. BALAJI[R-1]

231 C.A. No. 18835/2017XII

R ANGAYARKANI G.SIVABALAMURUGANVersusTHE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT, UOIAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 18836/2017XII

M.S.SHARMILA L. K. PANDEY

VersusUNION OF INDIA THE SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT UNION OF INDIAAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

232 Crl.A. No. 654/2017II

NIPUN ANEJA AND ORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

233 Crl.A. No.1381-1382/2017II

MADAN SUNITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] [ DEATH CASE ]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1790/2017II

SUDESHPAL SUNITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.97156/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.97158/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.97157/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4234 Crl.A. No.

1398-1400/2017II

NARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. P. V. SARAVANA RAJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

235 C.A. No. 703/2018III

COMPETENT AUTHORITY ANDADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF RAJKOT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusLILAVANTI JAYANTILAL PAREKH SINCEDECEASED THROUGH LRS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[R-1]

236 C.A. No. 21006/2017XII

MCT M. CHIDAMBARAM TRUST G. BALAJIVersusV. RAVICHANDRAN KSN & CO.[CAVEAT]

237 C.A. No. 23508/2017XVII-A

M/S. COIMBATORE PIONEERFETILIZERS LTD. SAKSHI KAKKAR

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANYLTD.

238 C.A. No. 4985/2018III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. BRIJ KISHORE M. C. DHINGRA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 06-10-2020 }

239 C.A. No. 214/2018XI-A

THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. SUBHASISH MOHANTY[P-1]VersusMANGING COMMITTEE OF BHARATIHIGH SCHOOL AND ORS.

SUDARSH MENON[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

Mr. Somanatha padhan, Mr. A.Lakshmi Narayanan, Advocates for Interventionapplicaiton and Mr. Sudarsh Menon Advocate for application for Revocation of SLP

240 SLP(Crl) No.9578-9579/2017II-A

RAJESH AND ANR. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] [ DEATH CASE ]FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 131944/2017

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3173/2018II-A

OM PRAKASH SUPRIYA JUNEJA

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44471/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.44474/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.44468/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

241 C.A. No. 20917/2017XVII-A

ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANR. ASTHA SHARMAVersusNITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD. KMNP LAW AOR[R-1]

242 Crl.A. No.361-362/2018II

CHOTKAU HARSH PARASHAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH PARMANAND PANDEY[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ]

243 Crl.A. No.255-256/2018II-A

BHAGCHANDRA SRIDEVI PANIKKAR

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHTO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES[ DEATH CASE ]

244 C.A. No.8998-8999/2018XVII-A

M/S ARFAT PETRO CHEMICALS PVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN

Versus

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SAKSHI MITTAL[R-1]

245 Crl.A. No. 1537/2018II-B

TAQDIR ROBIN KHOKHARVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENlist the appeal itself of hearing in the second week of February, 2020. (Ref. : R/Pdated 20.9.2019)

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 9260/2018II-B

ARUN ANISH R. SHAH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA3188/2019

ConnectedDiary No. 41453-2018II-B

JYOTI PRAKASH ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.174559/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.174561/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 10962-2019II-B

KULDEEP @ BHANDARI ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusSTATE OF HARYANAIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 57835/2019 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 57837/2019

246 C.A. No. 2372/2019XVII-A

HEBRON DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. P. V. DINESHVersusVINEYARD MEADOWS VILLA OWNERSASSOCIATION BIJU P RAMAN[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-6]

247 C.A. No. 11725/2018XVI

SANAT KUMAR BISWAS AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.VersusBISHNUPRIYA DEY SHASHI KIRAN[CAVEAT]

248 Crl.A. No. 400/2019II-A

VILAS RICHA KAPOOR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

249 C.A. No. 4979/2019XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAVersusVEDIC RESORTS AND HOTELS PVT. LTD. SUSMIT PUSHKAR[CAVEAT]

250 Crl.A. No.946-947/2019II

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH CHANDEL CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

Versus

STATE OF U.P. RAMJEE PANDEY[CAVEAT], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 }ConnectedCrl.A. No.1046-1047/2019II

RAGHUVIR SINGH DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

Versus

STATE OF U.P. ETC RAMJEE PANDEY[CAVEAT], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 94718/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ON RECORD THE MEDICALRECORD OF THE PETITIONER ON IA 96839/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 127729/2019 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 50931/2020 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 50934/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 54512/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING PAPER BOOKS ON IA54514/2020 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ON IA 54515/2020

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2020. 10. 1. · govind prasad kediyal t. mahipal 9 c.a. no. 2834/2010 xii a.v.sureshbabu and anr. shobha ramamoorthy

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedCrl.A. No.1279-1280/2019II

NASEEM PREM SUNDER JHA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RAMJEE PANDEY[CAVEAT], RUCHIRAGOEL[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 114089/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 132397/2019 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA88270/2020

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1030-1031/2019II

ASHUTOSH SINGH @ DABBU DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RAMJEE PANDEY[CAVEAT], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ONIA 100205/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT ON IA 100207/2019 FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL ON IA 73531/2020

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1804-1805/2019II

BHAN SINGH DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ETC. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ONIA 172859/2019 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 172860/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 172861/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1269-1270/2019II

PRADEEP SINGH AND ANR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF U.P. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], RAMJEEPANDEY[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } IA No.119529/2019-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.119527/2019-GRANT OFBAIL and IA No.119526/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1980-1981/2019II

SAHAB SINGH NARESH KUMAR

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RAMJEE PANDEY[CAVEAT], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 08-10-2020 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 169397/2019 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 169398/2019 FOR GRANT OFBAIL ON IA 169399/2019

NEW DELHI01-10-2020 15:56:40

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR