Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Support Material Agenda Item No. 12
Board of Directors Meeting
January 8, 2020 10:30 AM
Location: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
First Floor Lobby Board Room Santa Fe Depot, 1170 W. 3rd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410
CONSENT CALENDAR
Transit
12. Needles Short Range Transit Plan
That the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority:
Approve the Needles Short Range Transit Plan 2020-2025.
The Needles Short Range Transit Plan 2020-2025 is being provided separately for your information.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES
SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN
2020- 2025Draft Report
Prepared for the City of Needles and SBCTA
Prepared by AMMA Transit Planning
November 2019
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING ii
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING iii
Needles Transit Services Short Range Transit Plan
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 2
DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................... 2 KEY DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................................ 8 PREVIOUS PLANNING STUDIES ......................................................................................................................................... 19
COMMUNITY OUTREACH ............................................................................................................................... 27
APPROACH .................................................................................................................................................................. 27 MESSAGES FROM THE PUBLIC MEETING ............................................................................................................................ 28 TEN THEMES DRAWN FROM COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................................... 30 SURVEY FINDINGS FROM CURRENT RIDERS ........................................................................................................................ 34
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................ 46
EXISTING DEVIATED FIXED-ROUTE AND DAR SERVICE PERFORMANCE .................................................................................... 46
OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 51
OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 51 SRTP PLAN SCENARIOS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................. 53
FINANCIAL PLAN ............................................................................................................................................ 60
OPERATING BUDGET/FUNDING REQUEST .......................................................................................................................... 60 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .................................................................................................................................. 66
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................................. 67
APPENDIX A: ONBOARD SURVEY DATA ............................................................................................................................. 67 APPENDIX B: NEEDLES BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT LIST ......................................................................................................... 74
List of Figures
Figure 1, City of Needles as the Eastern-most Transit Operator in San Bernardino County ......................................... 2 Figure 2, Car Share Description From VVTA.org Website .............................................................................................. 6 Figure 3, Bullhead City Transit System Map .................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 4, Changes in City of Needles Population Estimates Over Time ......................................................................... 9 Figure 5, City of Needles, Demographics by Race........................................................................................................ 10 Figure 6, Change in Proportion of Population Age 17 and Younger Over Time .......................................................... 12 Figure 7, Change in Proportion of Population Age 65 and Over.................................................................................. 12 Figure 8, Post Campaign Survey: Free Ride Users........................................................................................................ 23 Figure 9, Agencies and Organizations Involved in SRTP Research ............................................................................... 27 Figure 10, Outcome of Voting on Improvements at Community Open House ........................................................... 29 Figure 11, Onboard Survey: Age of Rider ..................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 12, Onboard Survey: Ability to Drive ................................................................................................................ 36
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING iv
Figure 13, Onboard Survey: Other Modes of Travel .................................................................................................... 36 Figure 14, Onboard Survey: Where Riders Live ........................................................................................................... 37 Figure 15, Onboard Survey: Employment Status ......................................................................................................... 37 Figure 16, Onboard Survey: Household Income .......................................................................................................... 38 Figure 17, Onboard Survey: Smartphone Access ......................................................................................................... 38 Figure 18, Onboard Survey: NAT Ridership Tenure ..................................................................................................... 39 Figure 19, Onboard Survey: Trip Purpose .................................................................................................................... 40 Figure 20, Onboard Survey: Fare Payment .................................................................................................................. 40 Figure 21, Onboard Survey: Mobility Device Usage .................................................................................................... 41 Figure 22, Onboard Survey: Other Transportation Services ........................................................................................ 41 Figure 23, Onboard Survey: NAT Performance Ratings ............................................................................................... 42 Figure 24, Onboard Survey: Importance of Service Improvements ............................................................................ 43 Figure 25, Onboard Survey: Most Important Service Improvement ........................................................................... 43 Figure 26, Onboard Survey: Ft. Mohave Service .......................................................................................................... 44 Figure 27, Onboard Survey: Access to Transit Information ......................................................................................... 44 Figure 28, Needles Transit Services Trips Provided ..................................................................................................... 46 Figure 29, Needles Transit Services Farebox Recovery................................................................................................ 47 Figure 30, Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot – For Illustrative Only Purpose (not to scale) ................................... 56
List of Tables
Table 1, City of Needles Public Transportation Services Fare Table .............................................................................. 5 Table 2, Route 200 Service to Barstow and Victorville .................................................................................................. 6 Table 3, Population Change: City of Needles and San Bernardino County................................................................... 9 Table 4, Median Age Over Time ................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 5, Household Characteristics: City of Needles and San Bernardino County ..................................................... 13 Table 6, Median Household Income Over Time .......................................................................................................... 15 Table 7, Percent of All Individuals Living In Poverty .................................................................................................... 15 Table 8, Access to a Vehicle (Workers Age 16 and over by Household) ...................................................................... 16 Table 9, Employment Status ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Table 10, Travel to Work Characteristics of Working Age Individuals ......................................................................... 18 Table 11, Post-Campaign Survey: Change in Ridership................................................................................................ 23 Table 12, Onboard Survey: Marketing Awareness and Free Rides .............................................................................. 45 Table 13, Needles Transit Services Performance Summary ........................................................................................ 48 Table 14, Needles Area Transit Performance Summary .............................................................................................. 49 Table 15, Dial-a-Ride Performance Summary .............................................................................................................. 49 Table 16, Dial-a-Ride Medical Performance Summary ................................................................................................ 50 Table 17, Overview of 15 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 52 Table 18, Fare Structure for Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot .............................................................................. 54 Table 19, Fort Mohave/Bullhead Operating and Capital Costs ................................................................................... 55
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 1
Needles Transit Services Short Range Transit Plan
INTRODUCTION
The City of Needles is required to prepare a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to guide expenditure of
public funds for near and mid-terms activities of its public transportation program, in compliance with
the California Transportation Development Act (TDA). The City of Needles’ last SRTP was prepared in FY
2015-2016. Developing this SRTP, under the sponsorship of the San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority (SBCTA), is advisable, given changes in the flow of state funds to the City of Needles that will
positively impact its transportation program.
During the period leading up to the current SRTP development
process, the City of Needles participated in an SBCTA-
sponsored marketing effort termed the Local Carbon Transit
Programs’ Marketing and Subsidy Project. This has brought a
refreshed look and new marketing tools to the City’s transit
operation and administration. Among these are the bus
wraps on the Needles Area Transit’s (NAT) new buses, a new ride guide, refreshed web information and
new bus stop signage.
Early results on the impacts of this multipronged marketing effort, reported later in this document,
indicate that new riders are using the NAT. After a period of declining ridership, this is very good news.
This SRTP 2020-2025 will seek to build upon this recent favorable experience.
This document is an examination of existing conditions within the City of Needles related to the mobility
needs and concerns of residents. This will help to establish the framework for this SRTP and the
alternatives and recommendations that it proposes, for the continued provision of public transportation
to Needle residents. This includes describing potential demand for public transit service, including
particular markets to characterize general mobility needs of the community. This document discusses:
▪ Description of Study Area
▪ Key Demographic Characteristics
▪ Review of Previous Planning Efforts
▪ NAT On-Board Rider Survey
▪ Public Outreach Activities and Themes
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Description of Study Area
The City of Needles and its transit programs are among four operators in San Bernardino County’s
mountain and desert region. Needles is located on the eastern border of San Bernardino County in the
State of California along the Colorado River, over 200 miles from the City of San Bernardino. The City
spreads over 30 square miles in the rural portion of the County with most of the City developing along I-
40 and the Colorado River. At the eastern border of the City is the State of Arizona, the Fort Mohave
Reservation to the north, the Sacramento Mountains to the west and Chemehuevi Mountains to the
south.
Figure 1, City of Needles as the Eastern-most Transit Operator in San Bernardino County
The City lies along major thoroughfares, including the following:
▪ I-40 — a key east-west highway of the Interstate system with the western terminus at I-15 in the
City of Barstow and eastern terminus at I-95 in Benson, North Carolina.
▪ U.S. Route 95 — a major highway connecting I-10 in the City of Blythe and Needles and
extending into Arizona and Nevada.
▪ BNSF corridor — a major railroad corridor between Southern California and Chicago, Illinois.
The Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad operates freight trains along this corridor,
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 3
which the City of Needles lays along the alignment. In addition, Amtrak operates the Southwest
Chief along this railroad corridor with a stop in Needles.
The City is identified by several different distinguishing factors and general locations. Needles Transit
Services provides service to and from many of these specific areas, as there are some key destinations
located throughout the City.
South End — Located south of I-40, this area of the City includes the Colorado River Medical Center,
Social Security Administration, San Bernardino County Behavioral, Needles Regional Senior Center,
Dollar General and a number of single-family and multi-family residential areas.
North End — The north side of the City can be categorized as the area east of Historic U.S. Route 66 and
along the Colorado River. Key destinations in the area include the Verde Shores Estates, Jack Smith Park
and Boat Launch Facility, Ed Parry Park and several residential homes located along the river.
Downtown Needles — The downtown area is situated between I-40 and BNSF railroad tracks. Major
destinations in the downtown area include the Amtrak Station at El Garces, City Hall, Post Office, Palo
Verde College, Center for Change and the Chamber of Commerce.
East End — This area of the City includes several residential and commercial uses. One key destination
is the Needles Town Center, which includes Ride Aid, Needles DMV Office and the San Bernardino
County Department of Social Services. The BLM, Needles Office is located in this part of the City. Rite Aid
is the primary shopping destination in the City, which provides limited groceries (no fresh produce or
meat).
West End — The west end of Needles includes many highway-oriented uses, such as hotels, gas stations
and restaurants. This area provides a number of employment opportunities for residents of the City.
Moreover, the west end of the City includes Needles Highway, the main arterial that crosses the
Colorado River, traveling to the State of Arizona. The Fort Mojave Indian Tribe office is located in this
part of the City and the area is adjacent to designated Fort Mojave Indian Reservation tribal lands.
The SRTP study area includes a portion of the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. The Reservation covers
almost 42,000 acres over three states: Arizona, California and Nevada. The Reservation includes areas
along the Colorado River, with the communities of Riviera and Bullhead City located to the north, Dead
Mountains Wilderness Area to the west and Goose Lake to the south, with the Tribal headquarters
located in the City of Needles.
Available Public Transportation Services in the City
The City of Needles operates four public transportation services:
1. Needles Area Transit (NAT) is the primary local public transportation provider in the City of
Needles. NAT operates one deviated fixed-route service on one-hour headways between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday.
The route includes two loops, both beginning and ending on G Street at Broadway. The first
loop is the West Loop, which stops at the Elks Lodge, Needles Regional Senior Center, Colorado
River Medical Center, Library and Sheriff’s department. The second loop is the North-South Loop
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 4
with stops at a Carl’s Jr. and Best Western Motel.
2. Needles Dial-a-Ride, also known as the Senior Shuttle, provides curb-to-curb service for persons
age 55 and over and for persons with a disability that limits mobility. Service is provided Monday
through Friday beginning at 9:00 a.m., and the final drop-off is at 1:00 p.m. Trips are scheduled
on a reservation basis with same-day trips scheduled after 8:30 a.m. Needles Dial-a-Ride
provides trips within City limits but, through special requests, may transport passengers outside
of City limits.
3. Needles Dial-a-Ride Medical is a service provided twice a week on Tuesdays and Thursdays,
available to the general public on a first-come, first-served basis strictly for medical
appointments up to the Bullhead City area. Service is by advance reservation and requires
advance payment of the fares. Prospective riders are asked to schedule medical appointments
accordingly.
4. Shopper Shuttle Pilot is a pilot program providing service once a week on Wednesday,
departing the El Garces west parking lot at 8:15 a.m. The Shopper Shuttle stops at the Walmart
Supercenter, Safeway, Smith’s and CVS in Fort Mohave. The Shopper Shuttle returns to the City
at approximately 12:30 p.m., dropping passengers at their residence. Round-trip fare costs
$9.00. Passengers schedule a reservation up to 11:00 a.m. on the Tuesday prior. The City of
Needles received a total of $1,475 in donations to offer fully subsidized trips at the start of
service in July 2019. Prepaid (donated) fares will be utilized until donations are exhausted.
Table 1 illustrates current fare payment for each transportation service.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 5
Table 1, City of Needles Public Transportation Services Fare Table
NAT Deviated Fixed-Route Service
Adults and Youth age 6 and
older
Seniors age 60 and over and
Persons with Disabilities
Regular Route (single fare each boarding) $1.35 $1.25
Deviation Service (single fare each boarding) $2.00 $1.90
Single Boarding Pass $1.35 $1.35
30-ride Punch Pass $39.00
Children age 5 and under, two per fare-paying
adult
Free
Dial-a-Ride (Senior Shuttle)
Curb-to-curb transportation for seniors age 55 and older and persons with
disabilities (single fare per boarding)
$1.10
Medical Transportation/Shopper Shuttle to Mohave Valley/Bullhead City
Round Trip to Valley View Medical Center, paid in advance $6.00
Round Trip to Bullhead City medical facilities, paid in advance $12.00
Shopper Shuttle Pilot Program
Round Trip $9.00
Transportation Options from Other Transit Providers
Additional public transportation in the region includes a Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA)-operated
bus connection to Barstow and Victorville, rail service and local bus services in Bullhead City, Arizona.
Needles Route 200 Needles Link (Table 2) provides service to Barstow and Victorville for those living in
Needles with one run and return trip on Fridays only. Service begins at 6:15 a.m. in the City of Needles
and drops off passengers at the Barstow Library at 9:30 a.m., in Victorville at Lorne and at 7th Transfer
Center at 10:50 a.m. and the Victorville Court House at 10:30 a.m.
The return trip from Victorville to Needles begins at 2:30 p.m., departs from Barstow at 4 p.m. and
arrives in Needles at 7:15 p.m. Passengers are encouraged to reserve trips with VVTA as far out as two
weeks ahead of time.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 6
Table 2, Route 200 Service to Barstow and Victorville
VVTA Route 200 El Garces, Barstow Library, Victorville Courthouse
Adults and Youth age 6 and
older
Seniors (age 60 and over),
Disabled/Medicare/Veteran
Regular Route (single fare, each boarding) $13.00 $6.50
VVTA Needles CarShare (Figure 2) is a program
initiated by Victor Valley Transit in partnership with
Enterprise Rent-A-Car. The program provides residents
with a valid driver’s license that are age 21 and over with
a vehicle to rent to travel within and outside of the City.
Residents can sign up for the program to become a
member in order to get a membership card. Members
can rent a vehicle on an hourly basis at $5.00 an hour.
Vehicles are available 24-hours a day, seven days a week.
Vehicles are parked in the Credit Union parking lot in
Downtown Needles.
Currently, one sedan and one van are available to rent.
Both vehicles are insured with liability coverage. A free
gas card is provided with the vehicle. Members are
required to ensure that there is at least a ¼ tank of fuel before returning the vehicle, using the gas card
to purchase gasoline.
Amtrak provides intercity rail service through the Southwest Chief between Los Angeles and Chicago.
Trains depart at 12:08 a.m. eastbound to Chicago and 12:31 a.m. westbound to Los Angeles. Trains
operate on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad right-of-way.
Neighboring Transit Agency
Bullhead Area Transit System (BATS) provides fixed-route and dial-a-ride (DAR) service for the City of
Bullhead City in Arizona, 22 miles north and slightly east of Needles (Figure 3). BATS operates four fixed
routes, primarily in the communities of Riviera and Bullhead City with services extending as far north as
Laughlin/Bullhead International Airport and as far south as the Mohave Walk-in Care facility near the
Mohave Crossroads Shopping Center on Highway 95. Service operates six days a week. Service begins at
7:00 a.m. and ends at 6:00 p.m. on Mondays to Fridays. Saturday service begins at 7:30 a.m. and ends at
3:30 p.m.
Figure 2, Car Share Description From VVTA.org Website
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 7
Figure 3, Bullhead City Transit System Map
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 8
Key Demographic Characteristics
Examining demographic characteristics can help with understanding the potential for public transit use
in a given area. Important themes about a community’s need for public transportation arise from
looking at specific demographic indicators that paint a picture of transit demand and need.
The following key demographic indicators are examined in this document1:
Population — provides the general count of those living in the target area, an understanding of
ethnicities living in the area and median age.
Households — provides insight into the household characteristics of the area, such as vacancy rates,
median household incomes, the number of individuals living below the poverty line and the number of
households with limited access to a personal vehicle.
Employment — provides information on employment status for those age 16 and older that are in the
workforce. In addition, commute mode choice is discussed under this section.
The following sections and tables also include information on San Bernardino County and California.
While these two geographic areas are much larger and include a combination of urban, suburban and
rural areas, they provide a point of comparisons for changes in City of Needles’ demographics.
Population
The general population provides insight to the potential overall market. In addition to population,
population per square mile is a helpful indicator to see where the City stands in comparison to the
County and State. Table 3 presents the population and population per square mile. Figure 4 illustrates
the City’s population change over time.
Changes in population are attributed to births, deaths and migration. In Table 3 population changes of
the City are compared to San Bernardino County and the State. Over the past 16 years, the population
for the City has remained under 5,000. Population growth increases slightly during this time period. In
contrast, both San Bernardino County and California experienced more than a 19 percent and 10
percent increase, respectively, in population between 2000 and 2010.
American Community Survey (ACS) data reveals that population estimates for the City showed a slight
decline in population in 2012 and 2013 but have modestly increased since then, with net gains of about
100 residents since 2000.
1 The key demographic indicators for this report are obtained from the United States Census. Census data is
obtained from two sources: 1) a Decennial Census is conducted every 10 years in a year ending in “0” and presents
a 100 percent count of all individuals living in the Country and territories, and 2) the American Community Survey,
5-year estimate, provides an ongoing survey that provides detailed information on household commute patterns,
employment status and information originally found under the Statistical File (SF-3) during the 2010 Census.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 9
Table 3, Population Change: City of Needles and San Bernardino County
City of Needles San Bernardino County California
2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016
Population 4,830 4,844 4,945 1,709,434 2,035,210 2,106,754
33.9
million
37.3
million
38.7
million
Percent
Change from
Previous Year
0.3% 2.1% 19.1% 3.5% 10.0% 3.8%
Square Miles 29.8 30.8 30.8 20,052 20,056 20,057 155,959 155,779 155,792
Pop./Sq. Mile 162.1 157.3 160.6 85.2 101.5 105.0 217.2 239.1 248.1
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2011 to 2016, data from corresponding American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
Demographic Profile by Race
Figure 5 illustrates the demographic profile by race for the City of Needles in contrast with San
Bernardino County and the State of California. Understanding racial demographics is important toward
identifying populations with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). The U.S. Department of Transportation is
committed to ensuring that all programs funded with federal dollars, such as public transportation, are
Figure 4, Changes in City of Needles Population Estimates Over Time
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 10
accessible to all persons and do not discriminate against persons from accessing such important
resources.
The racial demographics of the City vary greatly from that of San Bernardino County as a whole and the
State. The City is predominately white at 61 percent of the population. White/Caucasian people are only
30.5 percent and 38.4 percent of the population of San Bernardino County and California, respectively.
People of Hispanic/Latino racial background make up the second largest segment of the population in
the City at 22.6 percent. However, 51.7 percent of the population in San Bernardino County reports that
they are of Hispanic/Latino heritage while 38.6 percent of the statewide population identify as
Hispanic/Latino.
The City is adjacent to the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. Thus, 9.6 percent of the population is of
American Indian decent. In contrast, only 0.3 percent and 0.4 percent of San Bernardino County and
California, respectively, identify as American Indian or Alaska Native.
Figure 5, City of Needles, Demographics by Race
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
Demographic Profile by Age
Age can be a factor in understanding potential transit markets. School age children under 17 and seniors
age 65 and older can benefit from improved transit service. Such age groups are identified as part of the
U.S. Census and ACS. One measure to better understand changes in age in the given area is the median
age. Table 4 illustrates the change in median age over time for the City, County and State.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 11
Table 4, Median Age Over Time
Location 2000 2010 2016
City of Needles 39.0 39.3 41.7
San Bernardino County 30.3 31.7 32.7
California 33.3 35.2 36.0
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
Increasing median age shows that populations in the City, County and State are each shifting to an older
demographic. More importantly, the median age in the City now exceeds 41 years. This is a 6 percent
increase when compared to the City’s median age of 39.3 in 2010 and well above the countywide
median of 32.7 years and the statewide median of 36 years.
Changes in specific age cohorts can further describe the population. The two age cohorts examined: 1)
youth age 17 and younger and 2) seniors age 65 and older. These age ranges typically include potential
rider markets.
The first age cohort examined is youth age 17 and younger. Figure 6 illustrates the change in the
proportion of individuals in this specific age cohort over a period of time beginning with the 2000
Census. This figure compares changes for the City, County and State.
The proportion of youth age 17 and under continues to decline since 2000 for all three geographic areas.
In 2000, approximately 27 percent (1,332 individuals) of the population in the City was age 17 and
younger. By 2016, the ACS estimates that 24 percent (an estimate of 1,226 individuals) of the population
is age 17 and under. This decline in youth can contribute to the aging median age, as discussed above.
A decrease in the number of youth points to a reduced market share for transit. However, service to
middle and high school age should continue as this mode provides much needed service for children
that choose to use public transportation to travel to school and other destinations in the City. New
service alternatives may even provide additional opportunities for working age youth to travel to other
areas to access employment opportunities.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 12
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
Figure 7, Change in Proportion of Population Age 65 and Over
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP05.
Figure 6, Change in Proportion of Population Age 17 and Younger Over Time
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 13
An analysis of individuals age 65 and older yields an interesting finding in the City. When compared to
the County and State, the proportion of seniors increased significantly from 2000 to 2016 (Figure 7). In
2000, more than 15 percent of Needles’ population (758 individuals) was age 65 and older. By 2016, it
was estimated that more than 21 percent of the population (1,046 individuals) are seniors.
This increase supports the change in the median age and a shift to an older community. Public
transportation service is available to the Senior Center and other programs that support access to
services frequented by an older population and can help provide an alternative to driving for this market
segment.
Households
Table 5 presents selected household information for the City, County and State from the 2000 and 2010
Census and 2012-2016 ACS estimates. The total number of housing units, vacant and owner-/renter-
occupied units is presented below.
Table 5, Household Characteristics: City of Needles and San Bernardino County
City of Needles San Bernardino County California
2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016
Total Housing
Units 2,551 2,895 2,992 601,369 699,637 708,442
12.2
million
13.7
million
13.9
million
Percentage
Change in Housing
Units
13.5% 3.4% 16.3% 1.3% 12.0% 1.7%
Vacant Housing
Units 611 977 931 72,775 88,019 89,520 711,679
1.1
million
1.1
million
Vacancy Rate 24.0% 33.7% 31.1% 12.1% 12.6% 12.6% 5.8% 8.1% 7.9%
Occupied Housing
Units 1,940 1,918 2,061 528,594 611,618 618,922
11.5
million
12.6
million
12.8
million
Occupancy Rate 76.0% 66.3% 68.9% 87.9% 87.4% 87.4% 94.2% 91.9% 92.1%
Owner-occupied
Housing Units 1,104 1,015 1,123 340,933 383,573 365,576
6.5
million
7.0
million
6.9
million
Renter-occupied
Housing Units 836 903 938 187,661 228,045 253,346
5.0
million
5.5
million
5.9
million
Average
Household Size of
Owner-occupied
2.48 2.54 2.61 3.18 3.25 3.32 2.93 2.95 2.99
Average
Household Size of
Renter-occupied
2.49 2.50 2.15 3.08 3.28 3.31 2.79 2.83 2.91
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2010 data from 2010 Census Summary File (SF) 1, DP-1. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP04.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 14
The total number of households for all geographic areas (City, County and State) increased during the
past 16 years. Dramatic increases in the number of housing are the highest between the 2000 and 2010
Census. The number of housing units in the City increased by 13.5 percent during this timeframe, which
is slightly higher than the State, which only grew by 12.0 percent. By 2016, the number of housing units
in the City increased by 3.4 percent. This is higher than both the County and State in which the number
of housing units increased by 1.3 and 1.7 percent, respectively.
The percentage of occupied homes is much lower in the City when compared to the County and State.
In 2000, the number of housing units occupied (both owner and renter) was 76 percent. This is much
lower when compared to the County (87.9 percent) and State (94.2 percent). Occupied units in the City
would continue to decline in 2010 where only 66.3 percent of housing units were occupied. In 2016,
approximately 68.9 percent of housing units are occupied. Again, occupancy is much lower than the
State and County averages.
Average household size tends to be lower in the City when compared to the County and State. Both the
average household size of owner-/renter-occupied units is anywhere from 2.15 to 2.61 persons per
household. Average household size in the State ranges from 2.91 to 2.99 persons, as reported in the
2012-2016 ACS. Average household size in the County is much higher, averaging more than 3 persons
per housing unit during the Census and ACS period.
One item that stands out in this analysis is the vacancy rate in the City, which is over 31 percent, much
higher than the County rate at over 12 percent and almost 8 percent in the State. Even with population
slightly increasing, household vacancies tend to be higher in the City. Consistent vacancy rates coupled
with slow population growth points to potential issues, such as the lack of employment and/or
educational opportunities in the City. There is a possibility that many move out of the City to find
opportunities in Arizona or other parts of the State. Nonetheless, population is not declining and there
are people that benefit from public transportation services. Moreover, should new industries and
employment opportunities come to the City, many of the new residents can benefit from the available
housing stock in the area.
Median Household Income
Median household income is an economic indicator that provides insight into the standard of living of
any given area. Understanding household income ranges can provide insight into more serious living
situations that have implications for public transportation.
The median household income in the City is much lower when compared to the County and State.
Between the 2000 and 2010 Census period, the median household income increased significantly.
However, the City increased by only 19.6 percent while the median household income in San Bernardino
County increased by 32.8 percent. The median household income in the State would increase by 28.2
percent during this time period. In 2016, the median household income increased by 9.6 percent in the
City whereas the State would increase by 4.8 percent. The median household income in the County
would decrease by 2.5 percent during this timeframe (Table 6).
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 15
Table 6, Median Household Income Over Time
Location 2000 2010 2016
City of Needles $26,108 $31,226 $34,214
19.6% 9.6%
San Bernardino County $42,066 $55,845 $54,469
32.8% -2.5%
California $47,493 $60,883 $63,783
28.2% 4.8%
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 3, DP-3. Note: 2010 data from 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, S1901. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, S1901.
Poverty Status
Because the median household income is so low, this indicates that many may live below the poverty
line. Poverty status can be an indicator of the need for public transportation services in a given area. For
the purpose of this SRTP, poverty information of the City is obtained from the Census Bureau. The
Census Bureau determines poverty using income thresholds of varying household size, ranging from
$12,228 for a one-person household to about $16,500 for a two-person household and $24,500 for a
four-person household. These thresholds vary by the age of individuals, including additional allowance
for children or persons over age 65.
Table 7 illustrates the percentage of people living in poverty during the past three Census periods.
Table 7, Percent of All Individuals Living In Poverty
Location 2000 2010 2016
City of Needles 26.1% 26.1% 24.9%
San Bernardino County 15.8% 14.8% 19.1%
California 14.2% 13.7% 15.8%
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 3, DP-3. Note: 2010 data from 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP03. Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP03.
As of the 2012–2016 ACS, 24.9 percent of the City of Needles population lives in poverty. This is almost
five points higher than San Bernardino County as a whole, in which an estimate of 19.1 percent of the
population lives in poverty. Approximately 15.8 percent of the population in the State of California lives
in poverty, placing Needles nine points above this statewide indicator of poverty.
Although the percentage of individuals living in poverty in the City is slowly declining (as opposed to the
County and State where it is increasing), a significant portion of people lives under unfavorable
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 16
circumstances. Persons living in poverty tend to depend on public transportation service due to limited,
if any, access to a personal vehicle. Because of a high percentage of individuals living in poverty,
providing an efficient public transit service to employment, retail, medical and other needs is of utmost
importance, especially in areas where resources can be limited.
Access to a Vehicle
Access to a vehicle is also an indicator of the limited amount of personal resources individuals face in the
City. Those that do not have access to a vehicle must find other ways to travel to work, shopping and
medical appointments. This is where public transportation plays a role in providing access to necessary
life activities.
The ACS provides estimates of the number of workers 16 and over in households that have access to a
vehicle. Table 8 shows the number of workers age 16 and over that have limited access (access to one or
no vehicle) to a personal vehicle.
Workers age 16 and over in the City of Needles have limited access to a personal vehicle where 6.2
percent of households have no access to any vehicle and 24.6 percent of the households only have
access to one vehicle. The percentage of households with limited access to a vehicle in the City is much
higher when compared to San Bernardino County (2.1 percent) and the State (3.4 percent).
Table 8, Access to a Vehicle (Workers Age 16 and over by Household)
City of Needles San Bernardino County California
Estimates (16 and over
by household)
1,639 825,348 17,041,624
No Vehicle Available 6.2% 2.1% 3.4%
One Vehicle Available 24.6% 17.0% 19.7%
Employment
Examining employment status is helpful in two ways: 1) it helps provide an indication of employment
health of the area, and 2) an understanding of what role the commuter plays as a potential transit target
market. Table 9 illustrates the employment status of the population age 16 and older in the three
geographic areas over time.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 17
Table 9, Employment Status
City of Needles San Bernardino County California
2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016 2000 2010 2016
Population
16 Years and
Over
3,687 3,861 3,824 1.2
million
1.5
million
1.6
million
25.6
million
28.4
million
30.6
million
Number in
Labor Force 1,848 1,994 1,757 735,589 940,945 962,592
16.0
million
18.4
million
19.4
million
Percent in
Labor Force 50.1% 51.6% 45.9% 59.4 63.6% 60.2% 62.4% 64.7% 63.4%
Civilian Labor
Force 1,837 1,994 1,757 721,185 927,251 951,616
15.8
million
18.3
million
19.3
million
Employed 1,728 1,721 1,641 661,272 823,910 847,144 14.7
million
16.6
million
17.6
million
Unemployed 109 273 116 59,913 103,341 104,472 1.1
million
1.6
million
1.7
million
Percent
Unemployed 3.0% 7.1% 3.0% 4.9% 7.0% 6.5% 4.3% 5.8% 5.5%
Armed
Forces 11 0 0 14,404 13,694 10,976 148,677 143,435 130,452
Not in Labor
Force 1,839 1,867 2,067 478,779 538,565 635,920
9.6
million
10.0
million
11.2
million
_________ Note: 2000 data from 2000 Census Summary File (SF) 3, DP-3. Note: 2010 data from 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP03.
Note: 2016 data from 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 5-Year estimates, DP03.
Examining the employment status of the City shows that the percentage of the civilian labor force
reporting unemployment is at 3.0 percent, similar to what the City experienced during the 2000 Census.
However, this unemployment rate can be deceiving. In 2016, only 45.9 percent of individuals of working
age are in the labor force, suggesting that some are no longer seeking employment. Another factor that
can contribute to a low number of individuals in the labor force is an aging population where more than
21 percent of the population is age 65 and older.
Commute Patterns
Commute characteristics are provided through the ACS by sampling working-age individuals age 16 and
over by the mode of travel to work. Table 10 shows the travel to work distribution from the 2012–2016
ACS, 5-year estimate and compares commute characteristics of Needles with San Bernardino County
and the State. The working population is defined as those that worked during the sample period. The
working population includes both civilian and military personal. Travel to work is separated by mode.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 18
Table 10, Travel to Work Characteristics of Working Age Individuals
Needles San Bernardino County California
Working Population (Age 16 +) 1,639 834,181 17.2 million
Drove Alone 79.5% 78.5% 73.5%
Carpool/Vanpool 9.3% 12.5% 10.6%
Public Transportation 0.0% 1.6% 5.2%
Walk 6.2% 1.7% 2.7%
Bicycle 0.4% 0.4% 1.1%
Taxicab, motorcycle or other
means 1.3% 0.9% 1.4%
Worked at home 3.3% 4.6% 5.4%
_________
Source: 2012–2016 ACS, 5-year Estimates, Table S0801 Commuting Characteristics
The majority of workers in the City travel to work alone, reported at 79.5 percent of working age
population. This is comparable to the County level of 78.5 percent who drove alone to work but much
higher than the State with 73.5 percent of the population who drove alone. Carpool/vanpool is the
second most popular form of travel to work. Approximately 9.3 percent of workers in Needles commute
to work by carpooling, which is less than the County at 12.5 percent of workers and 10.6 percent of all
commuters in the State. A high percentage of workers in the City choose to walk with 6.2 percent
walking to a job/work. The percentage of workers that travel to work by walking in San Bernardino
County and the State is much less at 1.7 and 2.7 percent, respectively. Of significant importance is that
zero percent of workers travel to work through public transit in the City. A number of factors can
contribute to this, such as uncongested roadways, convenience and time savings of using another mode,
size of workforce, job availability and the lack of regional transit services.
Emerging Demographic Themes
Key indicators from the U.S. Census paint a picture of selected attributes of the City. Many of the
findings point to a transit-dependent population in terms of income and poverty thresholds.
Households with limited access to a personal vehicle also demonstrate a need for improved public
transportation services. Such services may need to extend beyond the City limits in order to provide
access to employment, retail and medical opportunities that exist across the river in Arizona or at
farther distances to the west within San Bernardino County.
The following list highlights key findings from the U.S. Census:
▪ The relatively stable growth of the area demonstrates that existing public transportation service
should continue.
▪ The population in the City is aging, with the median age of 41.7 years old. Moreover, the
number of seniors age 65 and older increased by 21 percent from 2010 to 2016.
▪ Youth, under age 17, while a smaller proportion than in past years, are still over 1,200
individuals and are likely to have some transportation needs.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 19
▪ Household vacancy rate is relatively high when compared to San Bernardino County and the
State with more than 31 percent of dwelling units unoccupied.
▪ Median household income is just over $32,000, well below the countywide median of $55,000.
▪ Almost a quarter of individuals in the City live in poverty. Moreover, more than one-quarter of
households have limited access to a personal vehicle.
▪ More than half of the working age population is in the workforce. This can be attributed to a
number of factors, including the number of seniors age 65 and over.
▪ The latest ACS estimates that zero percent of the population commutes to work using public
transportation. This can be attributed to a number of factors, including the lack of employment
opportunities, regional public transportation services or an aging population.
Given these findings, potential markets that can benefit from the existing public transportation service
continue to be seniors age 65 and older. Supporting services that address the mobility issues of this
population can aid seniors’ travel to the senior center, medical appointments and other opportunities
that can enhance individuals’ quality of life.
There is a small, but significant youth population in Needles. While its size is decreasing, need for
transportation services is likely not, given the low household incomes of many families.
Another potential market that should not be ignored is the commuter market, or getting workers to
jobs. It is quite feasible that expanding public transportation services to employment rich areas,
particularly those in Arizona, can provide opportunities for those living in the City. Expanding
employment opportunities will help improve economic conditions in the City and thus ensure the long-
term health of the City of Needles.
Previous Planning Studies
The following studies were completed since the adoption of the last Needles Transit Services SRTP.
Many of these documents can have a direct relationship and impact on this SRTP update. Some
documents, such as the Western Arizona Council of Governments Transportation Coordination Plan, do
not have a direct impact on this SRTP but do speak to the theme of coordinating public transportation
services in large rural areas with very low-density populations and the challenges of improving
efficiency, especially for those that need it the most.
Fort Mojave Indian Reservation Transit Study (2014)
The purpose of this study was to design and recommend a transit service for the Fort Mojave Indian
Reservation. The study area covered more than 32,000 acres in the states of Arizona, California and
Nevada. The study recommended implementing a deviated fixed-route within the reservation as well as
providing connections to neighboring transit systems of Bullhead Area Transit (BAT) and NAT. This
recommendation was developed using the methodology from the TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH
PROGRAM (TCRP) REPORT 161: METHODS FOR FORECASTING DEMAND ON QUANTIFYING NEED FOR RURAL PASSENGER
TRANSPORTATION: FINAL WORKBOOK. This methodology uses a combination of datasets to estimate demand
by determining the number of people likely to need passenger transportation and the number of trips
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 20
required to provide individuals without personal vehicles with a level of mobility equal to those having
access to a personal vehicle.
The study recommends connecting with NAT at O Street and Needles Highway. Transferring between
systems will allow for improved service and interconnectivity for the area.
The proposed service is expected to operate on 90-minute headways. The route will travel north-south
on Arizona SR-95 with a segment traveling east-west between the City of Needles and Arizona Village.
The study identifies two options that extend to the Avi Resort and Casino (Option A) and Target in
Bullhead City (Option B), which could extend the running time to 120-minute headway.
An operating and capital plan is included with costs associated with the three service types. The three
service types include Fixed Route with Deviated All Day Service, Peak Hour only service and Express
Service. A one-vehicle and two-vehicle option is provided for each of these service types. Operating
costs varied by service type based on the amount of service provided by the operator.
Capital improvements include system start-up, which includes revenue vehicles, bus stop signs,
amenities and dispatch systems. Total capital costs for all stops and two vehicles are estimated at
$492,000.
Funding sources identified through the plan include traditional Federal Transit Administration 5311
Rural program as well as other sources, such as advertising revenue, local government funding and a
combination of other federal Department of Transportation funds from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) and FTA, as well as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
San Bernardino County Public Transit – Human Services Transportation
Coordination Plan (2017)
This plan is a federally mandated document that identifies mobility needs and provides countywide
goals and strategies that improve mobility options for transit-dependent populations in San Bernardino
County. The plan specifically targets seniors, persons with disabilities, persons with low-income and
veteran populations that can benefit significantly from improved transportation coordination between
public transit service providers, nonprofit organizations and the county transportation commission.
Through the planning process, public transit and nonprofit agencies can apply for funding to address
these mobility gaps through FTA’s 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
grant program.
The plan was developed through extensive public and stakeholder outreach components with meetings
that identified service gaps throughout San Bernardino County.
Several themes of mobility needs and gaps emerged as part of the planning process. The following
themes specific to the City of Needles are identified as follows:
▪ Underserved and unserved areas exist throughout the County — Individuals reported a need to
travel beyond the City.
▪ Expanding service hours, days of service and increasing frequencies can fill some gaps —
Individuals expressed extended weekday service for shopping trips, extended Saturday service
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 21
into later afternoon hours and limited Sunday service for church and social activities. Moreover,
individuals expressed extending trips to the Palo Verde Community College facility.
▪ Long-distance regional, medical and work trip needs exist throughout the County —
Individuals expressed a need for long-distance medical trips to Arrowhead Regional Medical
Center and Loma Linda University Medical Center in the San Bernardino Valley as well as
medical destinations in Bullhead City, Arizona. Veterans noted that they travel to Lake Havasu
City Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, for medical care.
▪ Affordability can be a barrier to use — Persons from low-income households expressed the
difficulty in purchasing a 30-trip pass at one time and expressed an interest in a Day Pass.
▪ Increased awareness and training about existing services, programs and resources will help
meet trip needs — Persons in Needles stated that there is limited awareness of the Dial-A-Ride
Medical service for non-seniors. Moreover, stakeholders stated that the agency should improve
the website to provide more information on the services provided.
The outcome of these meetings was five goals with strategies that transportation service providers
could prioritize and felt that were significantly important in the region. Transportation service providers
could then develop projects from these strategies and apply for federal funding dedicated to improving
transportation options for these target populations.
The plan includes the following five goals to improve mobility choices in San Bernardino County. These
are:
1. Grow Mobility Choices
2. Promote and Coordinate Transportation Services
3. Connect and Speed Transit
4. Improve Healthcare Transportation Access
5. Promote Safe and Comfortable Mobility
Subsequent strategies were developed through the planning process to support these goals countywide.
Such strategies play an important role in securing 5310 funding for the region. Some of the top-ranking
strategies include improved healthcare access, increased frequency of existing transit services and
growing human service transportation services as an alternative to public transit.
Transit Marketing and Fare Subsidy Project for the San Bernardino Mountain and
Desert Transit Properties (2018)
The TRANSIT MARKETING AND FARE SUBSIDY PROJECT was a coordinated effort between SBCTA and transit
operators in San Bernardino County (with the exception of Omnitrans) to encourage and promote
transit ridership through a targeted marketing campaign catered to each operator. The project is a
multi-phase effort that includes:
▪ A Market Research Report — This includes findings from staff interviews, onboard passenger
surveys and customer experience reviews that informed the marketing efforts and
recommendations.
▪ Marketing Brief — This includes a description of the marketing campaign and slogan.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 22
The Marketing Brief for NAT includes improvements to the agency’s communication materials. This
includes:
▪ New Passenger Guide: The new guide includes an introduction of the NAT system, route map,
schedule and other rider information.
▪ Redesigned webpage: The redesigned webpage includes schedule information and route map
from the new passenger guide.
▪ Bus Stop Decals: The new decals include the stop name/location, time on the hour the bus
arrives and Needles Transit Services phone number and webpage address.
▪ Information Displays: These displays are placed at key locations to hold Passenger Guides.
▪ Ridership Promotion: Promotions include a postcard with the marketing slogan, information on
NAT and a fare incentive of 10 free rides, which are distributed to residents near the NAT route
by direct mail in early summer and fall.
▪ Exterior Graphics for New Buses: These graphics create a more modern look of the existing
Needles Area Transit's brand to create a bus wrap for the new buses.
Needles Transit Services implemented all these improvements within calendar year 2018. The first free-
ride promotion was extremely popular with standing-room only on some vehicle runs.
The results of the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) campaigns include some that are
difficult to measure, specifically in relation to increased awareness and improved understanding of the
NAT services. A central element of the LCTOP campaign was the offering of free rides, to see if that
would bring in new users and contribute to an increase in ridership. The Needles Area Transit saw
substantial use of the free-ride coupons, with 72 percent of the persons surveyed during October 2018
indicating they had used the free ride opportunity. This was the highest rate of use, among the four
transit systems participating in the LCTOP campaign (Figure 8). Of these, 16 percent were new users,
riding the NAT for the first time. In contrasting ridership of the NAT during the period of this campaign,
the NAT saw a 52 percent increase in use, up from average daily boardings of 92 passengers per day to
approximately 140 average daily boardings in the month following the campaign (Table 11).
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 23
Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA) Comprehensive Operational Analysis
(2017)
The VVTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) is a study that covers a 10-year horizon with
specific service improvements proposed for the first five years and service improvement considerations
up to FY 2026/27. The document includes a community and demographic profile, a comprehensive
analysis of services provided by VVTA, a public outreach component, and alternatives and service
modifications that best serve Victor Valley. In addition, an analysis of funding sources and capital and
operating cost projections were included as part of the report. The document includes an overview of
VVTA’s role as a Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) and identification of future
programs that VVTA can implement. Finally, the COA/SRTP provides an Action Plan over a 10-year
period beginning in FY 2018.
Figure 8, Post Campaign Survey: Free Ride Users
Table 11, Post-Campaign Survey: Change in Ridership
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 24
One of the more important items completed under this study was a Comprehensive Fare Policy Analysis.
The challenge with service consolidation is that numerous fare types exist for both VVTA and Barstow
Area Transit. Hence, the COA developed a fare policy goal to “create fare policies and changes that are
consistent between services in Victor Valley and in Barstow.” The proposed fixed-route and County
route fare policy includes proposals for “Urban” and “County” areas. The COA recommends reducing
cash and day pass fares for both urban and County areas in Barstow to levels in the respective Victor
Valley areas. A Fare Equity Study was conducted for Barstow that analyzed the impacts of the proposed
fare changes. The study noted that only 3.3 percent of Barstow users will see an increase in fares for
County routes. Veterans, seniors and persons with disabilities using a 31-day pass on County routes will
experience a fare increase in County routes. For passengers riding on urban routes in the Barstow area,
student day passes and the 31-day pass for all users will increase.
Within the study, both the Needles Link (Route 200) and carshare program are discussed in the report.
The Needles Link started on June 17, 2016, for the purpose of providing Needles residents access to
court and Medi-Cal facilities in Barstow and Victorville. According to the document, Route 200 is funded
primarily through Local Transportation Funds (LTF). No further service changes were recommended for
Route 200 since it was a new route at the time of the study.
This study included a description of the carshare program. Operating under the CTSA, the Needles
CarShare program began in August 2016 to provide Needles residents with a mobility option to travel to
grocery stores, medical trips and other trips that could not be completed in the City. At the time of the
report, there were 30 members under the carshare program.
Bullhead City Short Range Transit Plan (2014)
The BULLHEAD CITY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN (SRTP) was developed in conjunction with the Arizona
Department of Transportation’s (ADOT) Multimodal Planning Division and City of Bullhead City. These
two organizations formed the Project Management Team (PMT). The PMT worked with a Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of the Southern Nevada Transit Coalition, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe
and Western Arizona Council of Governments. This SRTP effort established agency goals and reiteration
of agency objectives, system evaluation, operations plan, financial and capital plans, and marketing plan.
Recommendations to highlight with regards to Needles Transit Services include:
▪ Goal 2: Address the mobility needs of the Bullhead City community with the objective to
promote regional connectivity.
▪ Service Expansion Recommendation 6: Extend service south to Valley View Medical Center in
Fort Mohave (VVMC) addresses this Goal and Objective. The proposed “Silver Line” would
provide four round trips on weekdays as an extension of another proposed transit route. VVMC
is located further south of the current southernmost stop of BATS. The SRTP references the Fort
Mojave Indian Tribe Transit Study, which states that there may be other proposed service
improvements to connect Fort Mohave and Bullhead City.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 25
Western Arizona Council of Governments (WACOG) Western Arizona Regional
Transportation Coordination Plan (2016)
The WESTERN ARIZONA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION PLAN is the Transportation Human Service
Coordination Plan that satisfies Federal requirements of a coordinated human services transportation
plan. This plan covers an area of Arizona’s Region IV excluding the Yuma Metropolitan Planning
Organization (YMPO). Coordinated efforts of this plan include the Lake Havasu Metropolitan Planning
Organization (LHMPO), La Paz and Mohave counties. This plan “serves as a framework to improve
coordination among transportation service providers and human service agencies in the WACOG region
to enhance transportation services for seniors and individuals with disabilities.”
The document lists WACOG transit providers, identifies mobility gaps and provides an assessment of
need. WACOG’s Mobility Management Program is also described in the document. The Mobility
Manager under this program is responsible for “cultivating partnerships and multi-agency relationships
to facilitate rides for seniors and persons with disabilities; coordinating community-wide networking and
coordination meetings; managing the regional transportation coordination plan; and providing technical
assistance and resources for partners.”
Ultimately, the document introduces potential regional projects funded under FTA Sections 5310 and
5311 programs. The prioritization process is also described in this plan. Through this process, a series of
regional projects were identified for potential funding. Projects selected do not have a direct impact for
those using Needles Transit Services.
Emerging Themes from Planning Efforts
Many of the documents listed here speak to an overarching theme consistent in public transportation:
improving public transportation access to those areas that do not have service. Many barriers exist to
providing improved transportation service, more notably the availability of operating funds. Transit
operators must plan accordingly and operate in a fiscally constrained matter. However, it is through the
planning process that transit operators can document and report “need” and identify how best to
accommodate this need.
This leads to the importance of reviewing previous planning efforts to better understand the “need” of
the agency authoring a document. Of the documents listed above, the San Bernardino County Public
Transit — Human Services Coordinated Plan speaks to the overall needs of those living in the City. Many
of the findings in the document show a need for improved regional travel to access employment,
commercial and medical opportunities outside of the City. Coupled with the findings from the Census,
this SRTP should explore the possibility of providing regional service to neighboring areas in Arizona.
Planning studies of the Fort Mojave Indian Reservation Study, BATS SRTP and WACOG’s Regional
Coordination Transportation Plan illustrate service improvements that take place within the
Reservation. Opportunities exist to connect Needles Transit Services to BATS in Arizona, thus allowing
better connectivity and more opportunities for those living in Needles. VVTA’s COA includes Route 200
and Needles CarShare program as integral parts of the agency. As the CTSA, it is important that regional
connectivity exists between Needles and other points of San Bernardino County.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 26
The Needles SRTP will build further on the findings and recommendations of other planning efforts.
Opportunities exist to create true regional connections and provide the residents of Needles access to
jobs, commercial, retail and medical opportunities that are not readily available in the City.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 27
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Approach
During early November 2018, outreach meetings were conducted with various Needles’ stakeholders
and constituency representatives to understand how current Needles Transit Services are working and
what needs, concerns and opportunities could be identified. Outreach activities included:
• Interviews with key community stakeholder agencies and organizations
• Public Open House on November 8th at the Needles Senior Center with notices on-board the
vehicles and around the community
• Meeting with Needles Transit Services Drivers and Dispatchers
Figure 9 presents a listing of the organizations and agencies who participated in the outreach process.
Including the community meeting, approximately 40 persons participated with another 60 persons
providing surveys through the on-board rider survey process.
Agencies Involved in SRTP Outreach
▪ City of Needles
▪ Needles Chamber of Commerce
▪ Colorado River Medical Center
▪ Department of Aging and Adult Services
▪ Department of Behavioral Health
▪ Needles Center for Change
▪ Needles Regional Senior Citizens
▪ Needles Transit Services Drivers and Dispatchers
▪ Needles Unified School District
▪ Palo Verde College, Needles Center
▪ St. Vincent de Paul Society
Figure 9, Agencies and Organizations Involved in SRTP Research
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 28
Messages from the Public Meeting
At the November Open House, participants were invited to provide feedback in multiple ways:
▪ Conversation with the consultant team and City staff;
▪ Writing comments and drawing on maps; and
▪ “Voting” with prop money on improvements that matter to them.
Written Comments
Comments provided by community members at the Open House largely echoed those heard during
other outreach activities. These included:
Access to Grocery Stores Across the River
▪ Need transportation to Fort Mohave
▪ Need transportation to grocery stores across the river, like Walmart and Smith’s
▪ Need rides for shopping trips (even on weekends)/need to be able to take more than two bags
Dial-a-Ride Improvements
▪ Replace Dial-a-Ride (Senior) buses
▪ Need expanded hours on Dial-a-Ride (Senior) bus: 7, 8 or 9 a.m. to 7 or 8 p.m.
▪ Need a 30-ride punch pass for Dial-a-Ride (Senior) bus
▪ Check that seatbelts on Senior bus are working
▪ Drivers need hands-free device for calls from Dispatch
▪ Drivers shouldn’t take personal calls
Regional Transportation
▪ VVTA CarShare program should have more cars and allow more than 200 miles a day
▪ Need bus service to San Bernardino and back, at least twice a day
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 29
Voting on Improvements
As they entered the Open House, each participant
was given $20 in prop money — one 10-dollar bill
and 10 one-dollar bills — to spend on
improvements. Participants voted by placing the
amount of their choice in buckets labeled with
NAT and Dial-a-Ride enhancements. They were
asked to spend the 10-dollar bill on the
improvement that was most important to them.
These 10-dollar bill “votes” were weighted more
heavily when calculating the totals. As detailed in
Figure 10, the improvement with the most votes
was Transportation to Fort Mohave/Bullhead City
followed by Expanded Dial-a-Ride Hours.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Earlier NAT Service on Weekdays
Earlier NAT Service on Saturday
Expanded Dial-a-Ride Medical Service
Sunday NAT Service
Later NAT Service on Saturday (after 5 pm)
Shelters at Bus Stops
Later Weekday NAT Service (after 7 pm)
All Day NAT Pass Purchased on the Bus
Expanded Dial-a-Ride (Senior Bus) Hours
Transportation to Fort Mohave/Bullhead City
Which Improvements to Needles Transit Services are Most Important to You?
Figure 10, Outcome of Voting on Improvements at Community Open House
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 30
Ten Themes Drawn from Community Stakeholders
The following 10 themes summarize the topics raised by community stakeholders during November
2018 interviews, dispatcher/driver meetings and Community Open House discussions.
1. Considerable awareness of and favorable impression of NAT services
Many individuals had favorable comments about the NAT services in and around the City of Needles.
Several human service agency personnel had ridden the NAT to understand where it went and how
riders accessed it. Others have been on the City of Needles’ website but most spoke of seeing the
vehicle traveling about the City, particularly the new vehicle most recently, and the NAT bus stops.
At the Open House, despite efforts to elicit concerns or complaints about the NAT from meeting
participants, none were proffered. There were no concerns expressed around on-time performance,
with some comments that customers recognize the NAT may deviate to pick up or drop off someone but
fairly quickly gets back to its scheduled times at its bus stops.
2. Current NAT network serving most areas of the City well
The NAT routing has essentially been in place since the inception of the NAT in the early 1990s. There
appears to be no desire or need to make improvements. Drivers commented that some deviations are
to areas “inside” of the neighborhoods where the NAT travels on the perimeter. But the deviation
capability makes this a non-problem.
One Open House participant asked that a stop be added in the south end of the route, between the
existing Safari Drive at Cherry Street stop, near Victory Drive or on East Broadway. Drivers reported that
they do sometimes drop an individual or two off in this area.
3. Some, limited support for expanding current NAT hours and days of service
The NAT currently operates Mondays through Fridays between 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. and on Saturdays
from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. There was some very limited support for expansion of service to Sunday, but
this improvement ranked in the seventh position among a
total of 10 possible enhancements, making it not a high
priority need.
Increasing NAT weekday hours on Mondays through
Thursdays was requested by Palo Verde Community College
staff whose evening classes run until 8:30 p.m. Enrollments
are small, five to six persons per class, but even a few
additional persons at these evening classes could make the
difference between holding them or cancelling them.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 31
4. Continued importance of bus stop, pedestrian access and bicycle
improvements
The City has commenced a multi-year bus stop improvement program with improvements and
enhancements to stops and shelters over the next several years. Stakeholders commented that with the
increasing number of days of extreme weather, more and more days with high temperatures and high
winds, the bus stop shelters are very important. The City’s emphasis on high-use stops makes sense, but
efforts to provide additional shelters, across the system, should continue expeditiously.
Improvement to sidewalks, with continued attention to wheelchair and mobility device accessibility, is
also important as there are still numerous areas of Needles without a sidewalk and with an accessible
path that is essentially hard-packed dirt. Drivers report an interest in more benches at stops across the
City. There is an expressed desire for solar lighting at bus stops, particularly for the winter months when
darkness comes early. Bicycles are an additional mode of travel in Needles and are particularly
important for young people. Continuing attention to safe-paths-of-access, including Class II and III bike
paths will benefit those on bicycles, as reported by Needles Unified School District personnel.
Bus stop information enhancements, planned for implementation this winter, met with an enthusiastic
response from several stakeholders. The School District and College personnel said that there are
newcomers who would benefit from specific times at each bus stop. DAAS and Needles Unified School
District staffers also described newcomers to the City of Needles who were unfamiliar with local
services.
5. Dial-a-Ride service (Senior Bus) is well used and appears to be popular
The City’s specialized transportation that provides curb-to-curb service on weekdays between 9 a.m.
and 1 p.m. appears to be a popular service, from a review of the dial-a-ride trip sheets and in
conversation with agency representatives.
Passenger trips range from a high of 33 trips per day to an average of 17 trips per day, with a solid three
to six persons traveling daily to the Senior Center for lunch.
These are short trips, reflected in average daily vehicle miles
traveled of 36 miles, and most passenger trips at 2 miles and
under.
DAAS programs, including the In-Home Support Services and
the MediCal program, make monthly Senior Bus passes
available for distribution to the local clientele, generally on a
first-come, first-served basis. Staffers report that there is
always a need for more passes.
6. NAT Fare policy a topic of interest
Various stakeholders spoke of the difficulties of some Needles residents in putting together the $1.30
one-way fare for a NAT trip. Reportedly, there are 95 to 100 homeless individuals in Needles. School
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 32
district, college representatives, DAAS and Center for Change staff all spoke to this challenge for some of
their constituents.
The St. Vincent de Paul Society has a modest ability to purchase fare cards and provide them to the most
destitute. There is some interest in bolstering their grant-writing ability in order to be able to provide
more such “free fare” opportunities.
Day-pass capabilities were expressed as a desire, one way in which to offset the passenger cost of
multiple daily trips on the NAT; although the effect of any type of day-pass on the minimum passenger
farebox requirements is not at all clear.
Agency purchase of passes is reported by DAAS, the Tri-State Medical Center, the Center for Change and
the Behavioral Health Center. No problems with the current pass purchase procedures were reported.
7. Connections to Arizona Medical appointments through the City of Needles Dial-
a-Ride Medical at a low level of use
The City’s specialized transportation into Arizona provides curb-to-curb service between the Needles
Senior Center and the Valley View Medical Center in Fort Mohave for $6 or to the Bullhead City area
medical facilities for $12. These fares are prepaid, with advance reservations for the service. An average
of two passenger trips per run, generally a single person provided with a round-trip, are made a couple
of times each week.
There were conflicting messages from stakeholders about this service. On the one hand, many
specialized medical services in Arizona, such as orthopedics, dentistry, ob-gyn and other medical
specialties, are not available in Needles. And, there are a few doctors in Arizona who provide services to
California Medi-Cal recipients. Conversely, the use rates of the Dial-a-Ride Medical are lower than
expected. Anecdotal information suggests that single individuals are using the service, particularly one
person who requires two- and three-times’ weekly dialysis trips with a four- to five-hour vehicle round-
trip. Stakeholders reported that as currently configured, the program doesn’t work for many, and some
riders reported poor experiences.
8. Connections to Barstow, Victorville and the County Arrowhead Medical Center
crucial to Needles residents who wish to use San Bernardino County services
Transportation assistance needs into Barstow and Victorville continue. These include court
appointments — now moved to Victorville — child abuse program referrals now in Barstow, and
visitation to kids in foster homes in Barstow and Victorville, among other trip purposes.
Various agency personnel reported general familiarity with the Friday-only service, Route 200, currently
provided by the VVTA, which originates in Needles at 6:15 a.m. to travel to Barstow and Victorville,
leaving Victorville at 2:30 p.m. with a 4 p.m. stop in Barstow and a 7:15 p.m. arrival in Needles. There is
some confusion about the program, with some perceiving that it only serves trips traveling to or from
the County courts in Victorville. Agency personnel at the Behavioral Health Service believed that the
Route 200 only served court appointments while several stakeholders were uncertain as to where to go
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 33
to get more information about Route 200. There was uncertainty as to whether the service could
transport a person in a wheelchair.
Stakeholders expressed appreciation for this resource, indicating that it was “very useful” but:
a) wished that it ran twice a week for those that need to stay overnight to complete their
business, and;
b) that it be extended down to the Arrowhead Medical Center instead of turning around in
Victorville.
Apparently, according to Medical Center staff, when Medi-Cal patients are referred to Arrowhead
Regional Medical Center, their trip to ARMC facilities is covered but patients have to find their own
return trip home. Behavioral Health Center staff noted that lacking a connection directly between
Needles and the ARMC, it would be valuable to promote information about connecting via the 12:30
p.m. VVTA B-V Line departure from ARMC to the Friday 2:45 p.m. departure from Victorville’s 7th and
Lorene Transit Center.
9. Connections to Arizona for groceries and for work trips are of high importance
Numerous stakeholders, including the Center for Change, Colorado River Medical Center, Behavioral
Health Center, DAAS and the Chamber of Commerce, spoke to the difficulty of transportation access to
groceries, including fresh meats and vegetables, now that the 99 Cents Only Store has closed and there
are no grocery stores in Needles. Also reported, with request for alternatives, was the unavailability of
transportation to jobs at the many businesses adjacent to Highway 95 from the Colorado River north to
Fort Mohave and on to Bullhead City.
Enthusiasm for some type of shopper shuttle — operating a couple of days a week or perhaps one day a
week with a couple of runs — was considerable. “Wonderful,” “excellent,” “lots of support,” “great” and
“huge” were among the adjectives expressed. Stakeholders observed that people had learned to adapt
to something that they shouldn’t have to adapt to and it would be much better to ensure a more regular
flow of fresh foods to Needles’ residents through some sort of public transportation solution. It would,
however, be important to promote any new service, given that people have developed varying work-
around strategies.
Serving work trips, including earlier a.m. and return trips at the end of the traditional work day, was
expressed as important by representatives of the Center for Change and the Chamber of Commerce,
among others, noting that there are quite limited numbers of jobs to be had now in Needles proper.
Most jobs are across the river, whether in retail or at the casinos. The increase in the Arizona minimum
wage from $7.50 to $10 suggests that it will be more possible to earn a living wage and so there will,
therefore, be greater interest by those without transportation to pursue entry-level work.
Awareness of the VVTA CarShare program, operated cooperatively with Enterprise Rent-a-Car, was
reasonably widespread among the stakeholders contacted. The two vehicles parked at the Needles
Credit Union on Broadway can be secured for $5 an hour for those who reserve the vehicle in advance.
Eligibility includes being age 21 or over, being a resident of Needles and having a major credit card or
debit card. Demand for the vehicles is reportedly high during the first week of the month.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 34
10. Limited use of technology in the transit environment
Community representatives, despite the recent LCTOP promotion of the NAT, generally expressed
limited awareness of Google Transit and its ability to identify the closest NAT bus stop and when the
next bus was scheduled to arrive there. Those introduced to it were quite excited to discover that NAT
buses were identifiable on their smartphone.
Riders of the NAT expressed concern that so much communication was handled via a cell phone that the
driver holds. For both the Senior Bus and the NAT, there is no tablet or screen display of trips, the Senior
Bus demand-response pick-ups or the NAT deviation pick-ups. Ensuring a “hands-free” environment for
drivers will be an important safety feature.
Dispatchers for the Senior Bus, Dial-a-Ride Medical and the NAT handle all requested curb-to-curb or
deviation pick-ups through manual entry into dispatcher logs. Given the small size of the system, with
single-bus operations, this has generally worked well. However, there are likely some tablet-oriented
tools that could aid both dispatchers and drivers, albeit at these low per-day trip levels, with computer-
entry of trip requests that can be readily uploaded both to tablets on the vehicles and to the TransTrack
reporting system.
Survey Findings From Current Riders
Survey Design and Approach
An onboard survey was conducted to invite input directly from NAT riders to better understand their
travel patterns and transportation needs. The results of this survey will contribute to the development
of future transit marketing activities or service modifications and improvements in Needles.
The two-page onboard survey included 33 questions, grouped into four topical areas, including:
▪ Travel behavior of respondent;
▪ Desire for service modifications or improvement;
▪ Access to transit information; and
▪ Rider demographics and profile.
Each survey was printed on card stock for durability and serially numbered to allow tracking of each
distributed form. The survey questions were developed by the SRTP consulting team with input provided
by the City of Needles and the SBCTA.
The survey was administered on the first Monday of October 2018. NAT drivers reported that the first
Monday of the month is usually their busiest day with the highest ridership.
Two surveyors boarded the vehicle at the first bus stop at G Street and Broadway and solicited
responses beginning at 7:00 a.m. Surveys were distributed to each passenger boarding the bus who was
willing to complete the form and had not already completed a survey that day. The surveyors continued
to administer the survey on each one-hour loop of the NAT service throughout the day until 4:00 p.m.
The afternoon ridership consisted mostly of repeat passengers surveyed earlier in the day.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 35
Summary of Survey Results
A total of 60 surveys were completed during the survey period. The survey data was entered into a
Microsoft Access database, where the compilation of survey data is presented in a series of reports that
can be found in Appendix A. These reports provide the compiled survey data summarized in this section.
Rider Characteristics
Each rider was asked to provide their age as an open-ended response. The responses were then grouped
into five brackets: youth under the age of 17, young adults between the ages of 18 and 24, adults ages
25 to 34, adults ages 35 to 64 and older adults 65 and over. The youth group and younger adults are
likely to consist of student travelers from grade school through college. The older age categories are
expected to include shoppers, work commuters and those traveling to various appointments. Overall,
adults between the ages of 25 and 64 account for three-fourths of the NAT’s ridership. Only 13 percent
of respondents reported to be over the age of 65 (Figure 11).
Figure 11, Onboard Survey: Age of Rider
The NAT’s ridership is shown to be very transit dependent with only 30 percent of respondents
indicating they had a valid driver’s license (Figure 12). This dependency is further reinforced as only 9
percent of those surveyed reported having access to a vehicle to otherwise drive the trip they were
currently making. This means that the NAT service is a vital lifeline for the majority of its riders. It also
means that in the Needles environment, where local resources are diminishing, the level of service
provided by the NAT determines when most riders can travel. Service hours, days, frequency and
geographic coverage govern the riders’ mobility.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 36
Figure 12, Onboard Survey: Ability to Drive
When asked what other modes of transportation they used besides NAT in the past week, 60 percent
indicated walking to their destination and 49 percent reported catching a ride with someone else
(Figure 13). Only 7 percent of riders reported driving themselves, further reinforcing the previous
findings of transit dependency.
Figure 13, Onboard Survey: Other Modes of Travel
As demonstrated in Figure 14, most of the transit passengers (37 percent) reported living “On the Hill.”
Residents of the East End of the City and Downtown are reported at 15 percent, respectively. The West
End of the City is represented at 13 percent of respondents, while only 7 percent of riders live in the
Needles Village. Another 13 percent of riders indicated living in some other part of the community. No
passengers reported living in Mohave Valley.
9%
91%
Was a vehicle available for you to drive for the trip you are currently taking?
Yes No
30%
70%
Do you have a valid driver's license?
Yes No
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 37
Figure 14, Onboard Survey: Where Riders Live
The employment status of surveyed riders is presented as those that are currently working, are in school
or are not employed. The majority of respondents are either unemployed (41 percent) or retired (24
percent) (Figure 15). This accounts for almost two-thirds of the NAT ridership and suggests that these
trips are likely provided for shopping or appointments. Part-time employment was reported by 20
percent of riders and full-time employment was reported by 15 percent of those surveyed. Only 7
percent of riders reported that they are college students. There were no middle school or high school
responses. It should be noted that some respondents reported being both a college student and either
employed part-time or unemployed.
Figure 15, Onboard Survey: Employment Status
Survey respondents were asked to estimate their household income by selecting the dollar range that
best matches their annual earnings. Of the respondents that were willing to provide annual household
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 38
income, 67 percent of rider households are earning less than $15,000 per year. Another 16 percent are
earning between $15,000 and $25,000 per year, as illustrated in Figure 16.
Figure 16, Onboard Survey: Household Income
Continued advances in technology and society’s reliance on web-based applications have provided
transit with new ways to interact with its consumers. Routing and fare information can be accessed
through a transit agency’s website or online through apps like Google Maps. Smartphones provide a way
to access these portals while on the go or to residents without internet access at home.
This survey reports that 37 percent of riders have a smartphone with a data plan (Figure 17). Another 39
percent report having a regular cell phone or a smartphone without access to the internet. While this
group does not currently have data services, it could be assumed that in the years to come, these
consumers might gain internet access as entry-level smartphones and cellular service become more
affordable.
Figure 17, Onboard Survey: Smartphone Access
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 39
Travel Behavior
To further understand the way in which riders utilize the NAT service, passengers were asked a series of
questions related to their length of time as a NAT rider, their trip purposes and travel frequencies. Most
survey respondents (40 percent) reported riding the NAT since or prior to 2012. Between 2013 and
2017, the NAT gained new riders at modest levels. However, 20 percent of riders reported that they
began riding the NAT in 2018, a significant increase over previous years (Figure 18). This increase could
be a result of the recent LCTOP marketing campaigns, which offered free rides as incentives to attract
new riders.
Figure 18, Onboard Survey: NAT Ridership Tenure
The most common travel destination is reported as shopping trips at 51 percent, followed by medical
appointments at 20 percent (Figure 19). This reflects an older, transit-dependent ridership base that is
largely unemployed or retired. Work trips were reported by 16 percent of riders while 13 percent are
commuting to and from school or college. Trips for recreation, long-distance travel and social service
appointments were reported at modest levels.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 40
Figure 19, Onboard Survey: Trip Purpose
Figure 20 demonstrates that the majority of riders (72 percent) used cash to pay the bus fare for the trip
they were making when surveyed. The NAT offers a 30-punch pass that offers a discount over the cash
fare for a single trip. The punch pass was used by 19 percent of passengers while the single-ride passes
and the promotional free coupon from the LCTOP marketing campaign were used by 5 percent of
passengers, respectively.
Figure 20, Onboard Survey: Fare Payment
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 41
Only 10 percent of surveyed riders boarded the vehicle with a mobility device. Of those, 83 percent, or
five people, boarded with a walker. Only one passenger boarded with an electric scooter. There were no
wheelchair passengers surveyed that day (Figure 21).
Figure 21, Onboard Survey: Mobility Device Usage
The NAT is still the most utilized service in the Needles community, but transportation options have
grown over the past couple of years with the introduction of VVTA’s Route 200 to Barstow and the
CarShare program. In the past 30 days, 58 percent of passengers indicated having ridden Amtrak while
32 percent of riders have used the local senior and disabled Dial-A-Ride (Figure 22). More than one-
fourth of respondents have used the VVTA Route 200 to Barstow and 11 percent have used the Dial-A-
Ride Medical service into Arizona. Figure 22, Onboard Survey: Other Transportation Services
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 42
Service Rating and Desire for Improvements
Service satisfaction is presented in Figure 23 for nine areas of customer interaction and rated on a
seven-point scale, ranging from excellent to poor. Rider responses were predominantly positive where
every category was led with excellent ratings as seen by the blue columns in the chart below. Very few
categories have ratings of average or below; however, on-time performance, fare affordability and
operating hours of service show slightly lower satisfaction ratings. Courtesy of drivers, safety and ease of
deviation were amongst the highest ratings.
Figure 23, Onboard Survey: NAT Performance Ratings
Riders were presented seven service improvements and were asked to rate the improvements on a
seven-point scale, ranging from very important to not important. Outcomes are presented in Figure 24.
The highest rated improvement was to provide shelters at more bus stops. It gets very hot during the
summer months in Needles so providing some relief from the sun is of high concern to residents. Also,
highly rated was the possibility of an unlimited day pass that can be purchased on the bus. An analysis of
the financial implications a day pass might present to the system’s farebox recovery ratio will need to be
explored as this possibility is considered. Another highly desired improvement was to operate Saturday
service earlier than 10:00 a.m. Although still mostly in favor, the lowest rated improvements were to
operate service earlier than 7:00 a.m. or later than 7:00 p.m. on weekdays.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 43
Figure 24, Onboard Survey: Importance of Service Improvements
When asked to narrow their improvement choice down to a single option, 27 percent of riders indicated
their preference for more bus shelters followed by new Sunday service at 20 percent (Figure 25). The
introduction of an all-day bus pass is supported by 16 percent of respondents while all other categories
are favored by 9 percent of passengers, respectively.
Figure 25, Onboard Survey: Most Important Service Improvement
Currently, the nearest grocery stores for residents of Needles are located across the Colorado River into
Arizona in Fort Mohave. There, shopping is possible at Walmart, Safeway and Smith’s markets. Riders
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 44
were asked to express how important a public transit connection to Fort Mohave would be to them.
Responses, detailed in Figure 26, reveal a very high level of importance for a service of this nature, with
79 percent of riders indicating that it was very important and another 12 percent expressing a moderate
level of importance.
Figure 26, Onboard Survey: Ft. Mohave Service
The most common way NAT riders get transit information is from the drivers while onboard the vehicles
(57 percent). About one-third of the ridership is still using the printed schedules and 28 percent
reported asking friends or family for help (Figure 27). Information also is being accessed at bus stops
where schedule information is available. Accessing transit information online through the agency
website, Google Maps or a smartphone app is not as popular as other channels.
Figure 27, Onboard Survey: Access to Transit Information
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 45
To better gauge the effectiveness of the recent free-ride campaign and the feasibility of future
marketing efforts, riders were asked a series of questions related to awareness of the campaign,
utilization of the free ride and how it might affect their transit behavior.
Almost half of the riders (47 percent) surveyed had seen some form of advertising for the NAT bus over
the previous six months (Table 12). Encouragingly, 72 percent of those surveyed had taken advantage of
the free-ride campaign and 84 percent of respondents were regular bus riders prior to receiving the free
ride.
Table 12, Onboard Survey: Marketing Awareness and Free Rides
Transit Marketing Awareness YES NO
Have you seen any advertising for the NAT in the last 6 months? 47% 53%
Have you taken advantage of a free ride offer in the last 6 months? 72% 28%
Were you a regular bus rider before you received the free ride? 84% 16%
Do you expect to be still using the NAT in a year from now? 87% 13%
Discussion
The onboard survey findings describe NAT’s typical riders: adults, many unemployed or retired, who rely
on NAT as their main method of transportation. Riders are generally very satisfied with the NAT, with
the majority rating it as “Excellent.” They are interested in transportation across the river to grocery
stores, in shelters at bus stops and service on Sundays. This input, in conjunction with other community
input, is useful to prioritizing potential enhancements to NAT’s services.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 46
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Existing Deviated Fixed-Route and DAR Service Performance
This section presents the performance measures of the NAT Deviated Fixed-Route, Senior Dial-A-Ride
and Dial-A-Ride Medical/Shopper Shuttle Pilot programs. In Figure 28, key performance indicators are
presented by mode over a seven-year period, from FY 12/13 through FY 18/19.
Ridership on the NAT service declined each year between FY 12/13 and FY 14/15 to 27,748 trips, a two-
year decrease of 19 percent. Ridership remained level over the following two years through FY 16/17
and then declined again by 14 percent in FY 17/18 to 23,780 passengers. In FY 18/19, NAT regained
ridership to previous years’ levels at 27,623 trips. The decline in FY 17/18 could be attributed to the
closing of the 99 Cents Only store in April 2018.
The Senior Dial-a-Ride has shown consistent ridership over the seven-year period. The highest years of
ridership were during FY 14/15 and FY 18/19, reaching almost 5,000 passenger trips while the lowest
year’s total occurred in FY 16/17 at 4,019 trips. The Dial-A-Ride Medical service had its most productive
year of ridership in FY 12/13 at 199 passenger trips. Service fell to its lowest point during FY 15/16 at
116 trips but has slowly increased over the following years to 142 in FY 18/19.
Figure 28, Needles Transit Services Trips Provided
As a rural public transit operator, Needles Transit Services is required to maintain a systemwide farebox
recovery ratio of 10 percent, as depicted by the orange line in Figure 29. All Needles services met
farebox in FY 12/13 and FY 13/14, but declining ridership and increasing operating costs on the NAT
service brought the systemwide farebox recovery ratio down to 9.9 percent in FY 14/15. An increase in
fare revenue and ridership and a slight decrease in NAT operating costs brought the systemwide farebox
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 47
recovery ratio to 10.6 percent in FY 15/16. Increases in operating costs due to the change in contractor
for the Dial-A-Ride programs caused the system to fall short of the 10 percent required farebox ratio
during FY 16/17 and FY 17/18 at 9.6 percent each year, respectively. The addition of LCTOP funding for
two significant free-ride promotions has helped to increase farebox on the NAT and effectively raise the
systemwide recovery ratio to 11.1 percent in FY 18/19.
Figure 29, Needles Transit Services Farebox Recovery
Key performance indicators for all Needles services are presented over the seven-year period in the set
of tables that follow. Table 13 shows a summary of performance for the three combined services.
Systemwide findings include:
▪ Ridership decreased each year between FY 12/13 and FY 17/18 from 38,732 to 28,740 trips but
rebounded in FY 18/19 to 32,624. The lowest point in ridership is shown in FY 17/18 at 28,470
trips.
▪ Vehicle service hours remained constant between FY 12/13 and FY 16/17 but rose by 9.4
percent in FY 17/18.
▪ Similar to vehicle service hours, vehicle service miles were level between FY 12/13 and FY 16/17
but increased by 5.6 percent in FY 17/18.
▪ Systemwide operating costs have been increasing each year with the largest single-year increase
of 17 percent or $58,713 shown during FY 16/17. This was driven mostly by the spike in Dial-A-
Ride costs when operations were moved away from the senior citizens club to the existing
deviated fixed-route contractor. A slight decrease of less than 1 percent was experienced in FY
18/19.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 48
▪ Fare revenue fell between FY 12/13 and FY 14/15 but has increased each year between FY 15/16
and FY 18/19. The highest year of fare revenue was experienced during FY 18/19 at $47,764.
▪ Passengers per revenue hour decreased for six straight years from 8.7 in FY 12/13 to 6.0 in FY
17/18, a decrease of 31 percent. The system showed an increase in FY 18/19 of 15 percent to
6.9 passengers per hour.
▪ Cost per service hours and cost per service miles were slowly increasing between FY 12/13 and
FY 15/16 at about the same rate as operating costs increased. Costs increased at a higher rate
during FY 16/17 and FY 17/18 but dropped slightly in FY 18/19.
▪ The required farebox recovery ratio of 10 percent was met in FY 12/13 and FY 13/14 but fell
below the standard in FY 14/15, FY 16/17 and FY 17/18. Farebox recovered in FY 18/19, rising to
11.1 percent.
Table 13, Needles Transit Services Performance Summary
Table 14 shows the performance summary of the NAT service over the seven-year period. Highlights of
notable findings include:
▪ Decreased ridership in FY 13/14 and FY 14/15 by 19 percent, falling again in FY 17/18 but
recovering in FY 18/19.
▪ Steady levels of service hours and miles over the first five years but noticeably increasing in FY
17/18. This increase in service hours and miles can be attributed to the expanded Saturday
service (additional three hours) effective July 1, 2017.
▪ Annual decrease in average passengers per hour between FY 12/13 and FY 17/18, falling from
10.5 to 7.0 passengers per hour. Positive increase of 15.7 percent in FY 18/19 to 8.1 passengers
per hour.
▪ Met the farebox recovery standard of 10 percent in six out of seven years. Highest recovery was
shown in FY 18/19 at 12.6 percent, supported by free-ride campaigns subsidized through LCTOP
funds.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 49
Table 14, Needles Area Transit Performance Summary
Table 15 shows the performance summary of the Senior Dial-A-Ride service over the seven-year period.
Highlights of notable findings include:
▪ Fairly consistent ridership with highest production in FY 14/15 at 4,927 trips and FY 18/19 at
4,859 trips.
▪ Revenue service miles dropped by 13 percent from FY 17/18 to FY 18/19 to 7,926 miles. The
highest count of service miles was seen in FY 15/16 at 10,592.
▪ Fare revenue has increased each year from $2,745 in FY 12/13 to $4,478 in FY 18/19, an increase
of 63 percent.
▪ Operating costs increased significantly by 124 percent from $29,259 in FY 15/16 to $65,686 in FY
16/17 under the new contractor.
▪ Increase in operating costs has raised cost per hour and cost per passenger indicators between
FY 16/17 and FY 18/19.
▪ The increase in fare revenue has not been enough to offset the rise in operating costs, which
reduced farebox recovery from 12.2 percent in FY 15/16 to 6.0 percent in FY 16/17. Farebox
recovery in FY 18/19 was 6.4 percent.
Table 15, Dial-a-Ride Performance Summary
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 50
Table 16 shows the performance summary of the Dial-A-Ride Medical service over the seven-year
period. Highlights of notable findings include:
▪ Ridership peaked in FY 12/13 at 199 trips and then dropped to 116 in FY 15/16. Ridership in FY
18/19 was 142 trips.
▪ Significant increases in service hours and miles in FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 after several years of
decrease.
▪ Operating costs spiked in FY 17/18 under a new contractor with the highest cost experienced in
FY 18/19 at $32,045. Costs per passenger, service hours and service miles all increased as
operating costs rise.
▪ Farebox recovery ratio dropped substantially between FY 16/17 and FY 18/19 related to
increasing costs.
Table 16, Dial-a-Ride Medical Performance Summary
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 51
OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Overview of Findings
Both the Existing Conditions analyses and Public Outreach activities illustrate the needs of the existing
ridership within the City. It is critical to emphasize these themes to better understand the potential
recommendations that can improve the quality of life for those living in the City, especially those reliant
on public transportation. From the work conducted in these preceding chapters, residents of the City
and their stakeholders have indicated they are in need of:
▪ Regional connections to destinations that support everyday life, such as access to groceries,
shopping and specialized medical services that are not available in the City limits;
▪ Passenger shelters that protect passengers from the elements;
▪ Improved dispatching and vehicle monitoring.
Further refinement of these themes from discussion with the public generated recommendations that
were most important to existing riders, social service agencies and the City. This allows for the selection
of projects that help improve the provision of transit services for the life of this plan.
Prioritizing 15 Alternatives for Improvement of Needles Transit Services
In response to the findings of this Short Range Transit Plan effort, Table 17 presents 15 alternatives that
are responsive, in some degree, to the findings presented in this document. In order to assess these
alternatives, an analysis framework is offered. This includes the “score” at the public workshop or
interest registered via the on-board survey, as well as any stakeholder comments offered. How or
whether to consider this alternative further is proposed and finally, potential next steps are suggested.
The alternatives are presented in relation to those that can be readily funded within the existing funding
envelope and those for which further, additional funding will be necessary. This helps to inform the
recommendations, both those for the near term and those for the long term.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 52
Table 17, Overview of 15 Alternatives
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 53
SRTP Plan Scenarios and Recommendations
Recommendations are divided into two distinct scenarios, suggested by the preceding analysis of
alternatives. These two scenarios are 1) a Financially Constrained scenario and 2) a Financially
Unconstrained scenario.
The Financially Constrained scenario presents an environment in which transit services can be improved
given the amount of funding available during the life of this SRTP. These funds are a combination of
Federal, State and local funds that fund the operation and capital portion of the service. In addition, it
takes into account the funding realities provided through funding projections developed by the San
Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA).
The Financially Unconstrained scenario presents an environment that includes all possible service
improvements identified from the public outreach and examination of existing conditions. It is a wish
list of projects that can be implemented if the agency could receive unlimited funding.
Recommendations under the unconstrained scenario are not funded in the life of this plan. The benefit
of including these projects allows the City of Needles to pursue additional funding should funding
become available during the life of the plan.
Constrained Scenario
The Financially Constrained scenario includes projects that can receive funding during the life of this
SRTP. Projects selected under this scenario were among the highest ranking options ranked by NAT
passengers, stakeholders and coach operators. In addition, these projects address many of the issues
identified in previous planning efforts and speak to the need of regional connectivity, passenger facilities
that protect passengers from sun and rain, and the ability to capitalize on available technology to
enhance dispatching and improve safety.
Service to Fort Mohave and Arizona State — Ft. Mohave/Bullhead Limited Stop Pilot
Of the potential scenarios tested during the public outreach phase of the SRTP, service into Fort Mohave
for shopping scored very well. Due to the closure of the only grocery store in the City, many expressed
the need to travel into Fort Mohave to access fresh groceries. Thus, the City initiated a Shopper Shuttle
Pilot service in July 2019 as a direct result of the outreach efforts conducted during the development of
this SRTP.
In addition, the City’s DAR Medical service provides service into Fort Mohave/Bullhead City on a
reservation basis. Based on service performance, service productivity is very low, averaging 0.3
passengers per revenue vehicle service hour (RVSH) at a cost of more than $61.00 per RVSH. The
passenger subsidy continues to grow at over $225.00 per passenger in FY 2018/19. As costs continue to
grow, the ability for the City to maintain the service can become difficult. Thus, the City will need to
evaluate Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited service.
In an effort to sustain DAR Medical service and create an opportunity for the City’s residents to access
fresh groceries, this plan recommends consolidating DAR Medical and the Shopper Shuttle Pilot to the
Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited stop pilot (or Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited) route. This pilot route will
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 54
operate twice a week on a reservation basis and allow the City’s residents to travel to services and
shopping available to them in Fort Mohave/Bullhead City.
Conceptual operating parameters of the Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot are provided below. Upon
adoption of this SRTP, the City and SBCTA will work closely on finalizing the operating plan prior to
implementation.
Passengers using the Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited will board the bus at the El Garces west parking lot
at approximately 8:15 a.m. to begin the outbound trip into Fort Mohave and Bullhead City.
The Pilot route will operate on a zone system and each zone will include stops identified by the
passenger during the preregistration process. All service on the Limited Pilot is dependent on
reservations; however, if a trip does not have service into Zone 2 during one of the two days in service,
the Limited Pilot route will not stop in this Zone.
Outbound Zone 1 stops may include Valley View Medical Center, Walmart Superstore, Safeway, Smith's,
CVS — Fort Mohave locations only — and other stops up to the intersection of Arizona Highway 95 and
Aztec Road. Outbound Zone 2 includes all stops north of Arizona Highway 95/Aztec Road up to and
including Silver Creek Road, Bullhead City.
Inbound (return trip) Zone 2 stops will begin at the farthest northern point on the Limited Pilot route.
Inbound Zone 1 stops will begin at the intersection of Arizona Highway 95 and Aztec Road (Smith's, CVS
and Safeway, Fort Mohave locations).
A preliminary draft fare structure for the Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited is detailed in Table 18. The fare
structure will be determined as part of the operating plan developed by the City and SBCTA.
Table 18, Fare Structure for Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot
Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot
Zone 1 (round-trip) $9.00
Zone 2 (round-trip) $12.00
In addition, the City will initiate a marketing campaign to advertise this service. This plan recommends
that the Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited will begin in July 2020.
A description of operating costs, including a one-time advertising cost calculated as an operating
expense, is presented in Table 19.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 55
Table 19, Fort Mohave/Bullhead Operating and Capital Costs
Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited (FY 2020/21)
Operating Costs
Annual Revenue Vehicle Service Hour (RVSH) (Excludes holidays) 728
RVSH Rate $42.78
Total RVSH Costs $31,151
Other operating costs (e.g., insurance, internet access, vehicle fuel) $13,565
Operating Cost Sub-Total $44,716
One-time Advertising Costs (optional)
Promotion (includes printing) $7,000
Promotional tote bags $500
Optional Cost Sub-Total $7,500
Grand Total $52,216
Figure 30 illustrates the Shopper Shuttle Pilot route. The route shows the proposed stop locations for
the Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 56
Figure 30, Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited Pilot – For Illustrative Only Purpose (not to scale)
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 57
Bus Stop Improvement Program
Another recommendation that scored high is the installation of bus shelters and amenities at bus stops
to protect passengers from weather exposure. SBCTA, the City and AMMA completed a bus stop
assessment for the 2015 SRTP. Subsequently, the City received funding through SBCTA’s TDA Article 3
Transit Stop Access Improvements in which several stops were improved based on the
recommendations of the previous SRTP. Through these funds, the City improved pedestrian access and
installed shelters at several stop locations along the NAT route.
In an effort to facilitate a safe, convenient location for passenger boardings and alightings, the Bus Stop
Improvement Program will support SBCTA and the City’s initiatives to provide safe, accessible bus stops
that include, but are not limited to, shelter installation, associated passenger amenities, clear and
concise stop information, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant paths of travel and reinforced
concrete bus pads to minimize damage to the roadway. The City will receive an annual allocation of
STA funding to improve bus stops throughout the City. This Bus Stop Improvement Program will ensure
that the City continues to improve accessibility and provide passenger shelter and amenities on NAT bus
stops. In addition, the City will apply for TDA Article 3 funding when SBCTA releases a Call for Projects.
Appendix B includes the bus stop assessment, initial project cost and status. The City will prioritize stop
improvements on an annual basis. Several factors contribute to prioritization, including, but not limited
to, passenger volume, accessibility issues and bus stop location. An estimated total cost to update the
remaining bus stops in FY 20/21 dollars is provided in Appendix B. These costs will vary year after year
dependent on future material and labor costs at the time the projects are bid.
Zero Emission Bus Rollout Plan
The Zero Emission Bus (ZEB) Rollout Plan is a requirement of transit operators that operate transit buses
that exceed a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds. Given this new State
mandate, transit operators will need to develop a ZEB Rollout Plan that details how a transit operator
will initiate, operate and maintain an electric vehicle fleet within their service area. Rural operators will
need to submit a ZEB Rollout Plan to the State by July 1, 2023, which is within this SRTP cycle.
SBCTA is conducting a Zero Emission Bus plan specific for the needs of transit operators in the County.
Outcomes of this study can help assist the City in better preparing for operating an electric bus.
Replacement Vehicle
During the SRTP five-year period, the City will need to replace one revenue vehicle (Asset ID N-7). This
vehicle will exceed its useful life by April 2022. The SRTP recommends purchasing a vehicle during FY
21/22 to ensure that the City receives the vehicle once N-7 exceeds its useful life. The City will work
with SBCTA to purchase this vehicle using STA funding for the vehicle purchase.
Unconstrained Scenario
Recommendations presented under the Unconstrained Scenario are unfunded. These
recommendations will require additional resources and personnel to accommodate the increase in
service hours or the implementation of new services.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 58
Sunday Service
Of the other recommendations tested, 54 percent of those that took the onboard survey ranked Sunday
service as important compared to other service improvements, such as later service on weekdays or
Saturdays. Service currently operates six days a week. In order to initiate Sunday service, the City will
have to provide for an additional driver and dispatcher in order to operate the new service through the
contract operator.
Operate Weekday Service Later than 7:00 p.m.
This recommendation targets students of Palo Verde College. This will allow students who have later
evening classes the opportunity to travel back home after class from the Palo Verde College, Needles
Center. The PVC, Needles Center offers interactive video conferencing (iTV) with the main PVC campus
in the City of Blythe. Students wishing to participate can attend later classes if bus service is available
past 7:00 p.m. Classes at PVC can end as late as 9:00 p.m. Further research will be required to
coordinate with iTV class times to accommodate service from Needles Center.
Operate Saturday Service Later than 5:00 p.m.
Some respondents expressed value in providing service later than 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. This will
allow transit users additional time for recreational or work trips on Saturdays. Adding an additional run
will require an additional driver and dispatcher to cover a part-time shift.
Access to Jobs in Arizona
In order for work trips to Arizona to occur, service must operate five days a week. One service type to
consider is a commuter route that will travel during peak hours from the City to employment centers in
Arizona. One option is for a shuttle to depart at 7:00 a.m. from Needles for the outbound trip. The
inbound trip can depart from Arizona at 5:00 p.m.
Regional routes into Arizona are identified in a number of prior planning studies, such as the Fort
Mojave Indian Reservation Transit Study and the San Bernardino County Public Transit – Human Services
Transportation Coordination Plan. Unfortunately, funding for such a service is difficult. The City will
need to further explore the viability of this service to better determine if it is possible to implement the
route and potential funding sources that can help fund the service.
Expand Dial-a-Ride Service Hours
One recommendation is to expand Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service beyond 1:00 p.m. This will allow seniors
and persons with disabilities to continue to use DAR service throughout the City. This alternative can be
costly and is thus identified in the Unconstrained Scenario. Further examination of utilization and cost
implications will need to be considered before initiating service.
Improve Service to Barstow/Victorville
Improving service to Barstow/Victorville can address intra-County trips that are especially important to
those depending on County services. Social service agencies expressed the need to provide additional
service into the Barstow and Victorville areas. This service gap is currently provided by the Victor Valley
Transportation Authority (VVTA) through its Route 200 and Enterprise CarShare program. Additional
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 59
service to Barstow/Victorville can be improved should the City of Needles begin providing such services
to the area.
One alternative to address this service gap is a mileage reimbursement program to transport individuals
to Victor Valley. A mileage reimbursement program capitalizes on community networks by providing an
incentive to those willing to transport family, friends and neighbors to places outside of the City. These
programs work in areas where readily available public transit does not exist. In addition, given the
distance that residents of Needles have to travel if going to other parts of San Bernardino County, a
mileage reimbursement program is an attractive alternative because it provides a one-seat, direct trip to
a destination and back. This recommendation stretches beyond what public transit typically provides
but as the need continues to grow, other cost-effective alternatives need to be considered.
Improve Healthcare Access to San Bernardino Valley
Another comment received during the public outreach phase was improved access to healthcare, such
as service to the Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC) in the City of Colton. Residents depend on
Medicaid to reimburse healthcare coverage and must therefore stay in the State. Specialized healthcare
services are also available in areas with higher populations. This recommendation must be explored
with a consortium of healthcare practitioners to first identify the specific needs of the community,
opportunities for partnerships, and identification of funding to implement a plan that can provide the
services needed by those that need specific types of healthcare. Moreover, a trip reimbursement
program is also a feasible alternative for transporting those in need of specialized medical care to
destinations in the San Bernardino Valley.
Dispatching Software/Hardware
Dispatching software and hardware can enhance communication between drivers and dispatch. While
NAT is a small system, the agency can benefit from real-time dispatching to assist in driver safety.
Moreover, should services extend into the State of Arizona, the ability to locate vehicles will be ever
more helpful in real-time. Estimated costs of dispatching software/hardware are provided in the Capital
Improvement Program. Estimated costs are based on real-time tracking hardware/software in dispatch
as well as hardware/software components for revenue vehicles.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 60
FINANCIAL PLAN
The Financial Plan outlines the proposed operating and capital costs for implementing the
recommendations in the Constrained Scenario. The Constrained Scenario represents an operating
environment given the expected revenues from Federal, State and local funding available to the City.
Revenue projections are provided by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA).
Funding projections are developed by SBCTA based on historic data and current revenue trends with
assistance from industry professionals as consultants for State of California and local sales tax driven
revenues. These forecasts are based on previous allocations and are projected to fiscal year (FY)
2029/30.
Of important note, assumptions are required for the Transportation Development Act (TDA) State
Transit Assistance (STA) funds allocated through the population share. These funds fluctuate every year.
For the purpose of this plan, an amount of $200,000 is assumed beginning in FY 2020/21 with
subsequent years exceeding $200,000.
Operating Budget/Funding Request
The Operations Plan includes the operating costs for the three individual services provided by the City.
This plan includes the fixed-rate and variable rate of the new contract between the City of Needles and
Transportation Concepts executed on September. 10, 2019. This new contract is a result of the City
initiating a search for a new contractor to operate NAT deviated fixed route, Dial-a-Ride (DAR), DAR
Medical and Shopper Shuttle pilot services after the previous contractor, McDonald Transit, notified the
City it is exercising its right to terminate for convenience the agreement between the City of Needles
and McDonald.
The Operations Plan uses the City’s FY 2019/20 budget request to SBCTA. The budget request was
developed prior to the selection of a contractor. Using FY 2019/20 allows for a much more conservative
budget. Once actual costs for FY 2019/20 are available at the end of the fiscal year, the City can
recalibrate the operations plan budget for FY 2021/22 and FY 2022/23 to ensure that operating costs are
within SBCTA’s LRTP.
In using the FY 2019/20 budget, the Shopper Shuttle pilot is included as part of the operating cost for
DAR Medical. However, the FY 20/21 budget should include a line item for the Fort Mohave/Bullhead
Limited pilot route.
One final note of import, the City will conduct a budget revision in FY 2019/20 to reflect an increase in
insurance costs. The increase in insurance costs reflects Transportation Concepts rate and represents an
increase in the insurance rate beginning in FY 2019/20. Subsequent plan years will reflect the new
insurance rates from Transportation Concepts for all vehicles under the DAR services Vehicle Insurance
line items.
Table 20 illustrates the approved FY 2019/20 budget as of July 2019 (excludes any budget revisions) and
the proposed operating and capital budget over a period of five years beginning in FY 2020/21.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 61
Operating costs increase every year. In this scenario, the fixed costs and hourly costs of the contractor
were provided by Transportation Concepts and are reflected in this table beginning in FY 2020/21.
Modest increases of 2.0 percent in individual operating cost line items are applied in future years with
the exception of fuel. Due to fluctuating fuel prices, an assumption of 3.0 percent increase is applied to
fuel.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 62
Table 20, Five Year Operations Plan
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 63
Table 21, Operating/Capital Revenue by Mode and Fund Source
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING 64
Table 22, Allocation of Funding by Mode and Fiscal Year
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
65
Table 21 illustrates the operating and capital revenue by mode and fund source. DAR is primarily funded
through TDA STA Population allocation and Measure I. The Fort Mohave/Bullhead Limited route is
funded through STA Population allocation. NAT is funded by a number of Federal, State and local fund
sources.
Table 22 illustrates the allocation of funding by mode and fiscal year. The allocation of resources follows
the same methodology the City uses when allocating funds to each mode. Federal dollars from the
Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) 5311 program is allocated to NAT services only. This limits Federal
oversight to the NAT service only. DAR and DAR Medical are strictly funded through State and Local
funds, usually in the form of TDA and San Bernardino County’s local transportation sales tax Measure I.
The estimated fare revenue is also included in both Table 21 and 22. The projected fare revenue is
included to determine the net operating costs. A separate fare analysis is being conducted to determine
the fare structure of the three services provided by the City. The fare analysis will be complete this fiscal
year. Changes in the fare structure will impact the projected fare revenue of this SRTP. However, as
long as the City maintains its farebox recovery ratio as dictated by TDA, the agency is not in danger of
losing TDA funding.
Regarding TDA State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, funding assumption was developed based on need
per fiscal year beginning in FY 2020/21. This will be required to continue providing the level of service
for NAT, DAR and Fort Mohave Limited given the modest increase in operating costs. However, by FY
2021/22, the total allocation of STA – population (i.e., operating and capital) will exceed $200,000. In an
effort to maintain service levels, both the City and SBCTA will need to evaluate Fort Mohave Limited
service and decide to continue, reduce or eliminate service during the development of the FY 22/23
budget.
An estimated annual allocation of the State’s Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) is
included as part of the City’s operating expense. LCTOP is a funding program that provides operating
and capital dollars to transit operators with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Agencies utilizing these funds must demonstrate that projects and programs with LCTOP are reducing
GHG. In addition, an emphasis on implementing transit services in areas designated as disadvantaged
communities as identified under the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) is required
under this program.
Due to the nature of LCTOP funding, the City should continue to work with SBCTA on swapping LCTOP
funding for additional TDA funding with transit agencies. This funding swap will allow agencies in San
Bernardino County to maximize the amount of LCTOP funding allocated to the region while allowing the
City to utilize additional STA funding for operating service.
Other revenue sources may become available in future years. In FY 2019/20, the City budgeted $15,000
in Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) AB 2766 funds. Should the City receive
these funds again in future years, it can offset STA funding for operations of NAT.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
66
Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) relies on discretionary funding. Capital projects moving forward
under this plan during the next five years are listed below. Funding is subject to SBCTA Board approval
or awards from funding agencies.
Bus stop improvements – This SRTP recommends proceeding with the bus stop improvement program
funded annually at $15,000 in STA – population dollars beginning in FY 20/21. The City will be
responsible for prioritizing bus stop improvements annually. In addition, the City will submit an
application for TDA Article 3 funding for significant bus stop improvements when SBCTA releases a call
for projects. This plan anticipates that SBCTA will release the call for projects in FY 21/22.
Zero Emission Bus Rollout Plan – This SRTP recommends allocating $30,000 in Mojave Desert Air Quality
Management District (MDAQMD) funds, if available, for the City’s Zero Emission Bus (ZEB) Rollout Plan
in FY 2021/22. Rural operators that operate a transit bus with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of
14,000 pounds and over are required to submit a plan by July 1, 2023. The ZEB Rollout Plan will provide
detail on how the agency will achieve a 100 percent zero-emission bus fleet by 2040, the type of ZEB
vehicle(s) the agency will deploy, construction schedule of infrastructure required to support ZEB vehicle
rollout, the City’s efforts in providing service to disadvantaged communities, the City’s efforts in training
operators and maintenance personnel, and the funding required to transition to a zero emission bus
fleet.
Vehicle Replacement – This SRTP recommends that the City proceed with these strategies for
replacement vehicles for the Needles Transit Services. These strategies include:
1) Work with transit agencies in San Bernardino County to swap Low Carbon Transit Operations
Program (LCTOP) dollars for TDA funding to support vehicle replacement.
2) Maximize TDA allocation to use State Transit Assistance (STA) funds for vehicle purchase.
As of this current plan cycle, it is necessary for the City to work with SBCTA and the other transit
operators to maximize the use of funding in the region. Because of the LCTOP’s stringent requirements,
coupled with the State’s mandate of moving forward with vehicle electrification, an opportunity exists
to maximize the use of LCTOP funding. In order to proceed with this recommendation, SBCTA will work
with operators currently moving forward with vehicle electrification to allocate Needles’ LCTOP dollars
each year for TDA funding. This recommendation will require initial planning efforts and agreements
between the City and other partner agencies.
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
67
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Onboard Survey Data
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
68
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY60 Surveys Processed
1. In what year did you start riding NAT?
20182017
20162015
12 20%5 8%
8 13%4 7%
20142013
2012 or before
6 10%1 2%
24 40%
3. Compared to a year ago, which describes your frequency of riding the bus?
Riding more often than a year agoRiding less often than a year ago
Riding about the same amountI wasn't riding the bus a year ago
27 47%6 10%
18 31%
7 12%
4. What is the main purpose of this trip today?
WorkSchool/College
ShoppingMedical Appointment
9 16%7 13%
28 51%
11 20%
Social Service Appointment 1 2%
60Responses:
58Responses:
55Responses:
Recreation 4 7%
2. During the PAST WEEK, how many days have you ridden the bus?
12
34
8 14%9 16%
10 18%5 9%
56
7
8 14%10 18%
7 12%
57Responses:
This is my first timing riding NAT 3
Long distance travel 2 4%Such as connecting with Amtrak or Greyhound
5. How many ONE‐WAY trips will you make on NAT TODAY?
12
34
18 31%23 40%
6 10%5 9%
56
more than 6
2 3%3 5%
1 2%
58Responses:
5%
Summary p1 10/16/2018 1:28:14 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
69
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY, page 260 Surveys Processed
6. How did you pay your fare for this trip?
Cash30 Punch Pass
Single Ride PassPromotional free ride coupon
42 72%11 19%
3 5%3 5%
58Responses:
7. Did you board with a mobility device?
WheelchairElectric Scooter
Walker
Yes
0 0%1 17%
5 83%
2 4%
No 50 96%
6Responses:
8. Did you bring a bicycle on the bus today?
52Responses:
9. In the past 30 days, what other transportation services have you used in the Needles area?
Needles Dial‐a‐RideAmtrak
Needles DAR ‐ MedicalVVTA Route 200 to Barstow
6 32%11 58%
2 11%5 26%
19Responses:
Summary p2 10/16/2018 1:28:27 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
70
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY, page 360 Surveys Processed
13. How important would it be to you to have bus service from Needles to Ft. Mojave that would connect withBullhead Area Transit system?
15. What types of trips would you want to be able to travel to Ft. Mohave/Bullhead for?
ShoppingMedical Appointments
RecreationConnect to Greyhound
44 92%21 44%
12 25%9 19%
48Responses:
10. How would you rate Needles Area Transit on each of these service factors?
A. Courtesy and helpfulness of bus drivers.
B. Feeling safe w/ other passengers on bus, at bus stop.
C. Comfort of the vehicles.
D. How often the bus is on time.
0 0%
1=Poor 3=Fair‐Avg 4=Average 5=Good 7=Excellent
E. Ease of getting information about NAT.
F. Operating hours of the service.
1 2% 1 2% 9 16% 41 72%
2=Fair
0 0%
6=Very Good
5 9%
0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 11 19% 36 63%0 0% 8 14%
0 0% 1 2% 1 2% 12 21% 33 58%0 0% 10 18%
0 0% 1 2% 4 7% 9 16% 25 45%2 4% 14 25%
1 2% 0 0% 2 4% 10 18% 31 55%0 0% 12 21%
2 4% 3 5% 7 13% 9 16% 28 50%1 2% 6 11%
G. Ease of making deviated service requests.
H. Cost of the bus fare.
0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 14 25% 33 59%2 4% 6 11%
1 2% 0 0% 5 9% 13 23% 26 46%2 4% 10 18%I. Overall, how would you rate NAT? 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 7 13% 32 57%0 0% 15 27%
11. If Needles Area Transit were able to expand services, how important would each of these improvents be to you?
A. Operate bus service on Sundays.
B. Operate service earlier than 7 AM on weekdays.
C. Operate service later than 7 PM on weekdays.
D. Operate service earlier than 10 AM on Saturdays.
7 13%
1=Not Important 3= 4= 5=7=Very Important
E. Operate service later than 5 PM on Saturdays.
F. Unlimited ride All‐day pass that can be purchased on bus.
2 4% 4 7% 9 17% 29 54%
2=
1 2%
6=
2 4%
12 23% 6 11% 4 8% 7 13% 18 34%0 0% 6 11%
9 16% 3 5% 7 13% 8 15% 22 40%1 2% 5 9%
4 7% 5 9% 4 7% 6 11% 28 52%1 2% 6 11%
6 11% 4 7% 2 4% 9 16% 27 49%0 0% 7 13%
4 7% 4 7% 6 11% 6 11% 28 52%1 2% 5 9%
G. Provide shelters at more bus stops. 1 2% 2 4% 4 7% 10 18% 32 58%0 0% 6 11%
12. If they could make only one improvement, which would be most important?A. Operate bus service on Sunday.
* 1 rider chose A, B; reported under A
B. Have service earlier than 7 AM on weekdays.
C. Have service later than 7 PM on weekdays.
D. Have service earlier than 10 AM on Saturdays.
E. Have service later than 5 PM on Saturdays.
F. Unlimited ride All‐day pass purch. on bus.
G. Provide shelters at more bus stops.
9 20%
4 9%
4 9%4 9%
4 9%7 16%
12 27%44Responses:
2 4%
1=Not Important 3= 4= 5=7=Very Important
1 2% 0 0% 4 8% 38 79%
2=
1 2%
6=
2 4%
14. If there were bus service to Ft. Mojave and you could transfer to Bullhead Area Transit for trips intoBullhead City, how often would you use it?
Not at allLess than once a month
1‐3 days per monthOnce a week
4 8%6 12%
12 24%11 22%
More than once a week 17 34%
50Responses:
Other 7 15%
48Responses:
Summary p3 10/16/2018 1:28:41 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
71
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY, page 460 Surveys Processed
17. Which ONE of the information sources you checked in #16 do you use MOST OFTEN?
Transit agency websitePrinted schedules
At the bus stopSmartphone app
2 5%10 24%
1 2%1 2%
Google MapsAsk bus driver
Friends or family
3 7%16 38%
7 17%
42Responses:
23. A year from now, do you expect to still be using this public transit system?
Yes, I will still be using this transit system.
No, I plan to get a car and stop using transit.
No, I plan to stop using this transit system for another reason.
40 87%
3 7%
3 7%
46Responses:
16. How do you get information about bus routes and schedules?
Transit agency websitePrinted schedules
At the bus stopSmartphone app
4 9%15 32%
8 17%2 4%
Google Maps 4 9%
47Responses:
Ask bus driver 27 57%
Friends or family 13 28%
Other 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Yes 22 47%
No 25 53%
18. During the past six months, have you seen any advertising for this transit system?
47Responses:
Yes 33 72%
No 13 28%
21. During the past six months, have you taken advantage of a free ride offer provided by this transit agency?
46Responses:
Yes 36 84%
No 7 16%
22. Were you a regular bus rider before you received the free ride offer?
43Responses:
Summary p4 10/16/2018 1:28:53 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
72
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY, page 560 Surveys Processed
24. In what area do you live?
West EndEast End
Downtown NeedlesNeedles Village
6 13%7 15%
7 15%3 7%
On the HillMohave Valley
Other
17 37%0 0%
6 13%
46Responses:
25. What other modes of transportation have you used during the past 7 days?
Driven myselfGot a ride with others
BicycledWalked
3 7%22 49%
3 7%
27 60%
Used Uber or Lyft 0 0%
Taxi 0 0%
Responses:
Yes 14 30%
No 33 70%
26. Do you have a valid driver's license?
47Responses:
Yes 4 9%
No 42 91%
27. Was a vehicle available for you to drive for the trip you are currently taking?
46Responses:
28. How old are you?
17 and under18 to 24
25 to 3435 to 64
2 4%3 7%
12 27%22 49%
65 and over 6 13%
45Responses:
45
29. Which of the following describes your employment status?
Employed full timeEmployed part time
College StudentMiddle/HS Student
7 15%
9 20%3 7%0 0%
Not Employed 19 41%
Retired 11 24%
Responses: 46
Summary p5 10/16/2018 1:29:21 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
73
NAT PASSENGER SURVEY SUMMARY, page 660 Surveys Processed
Responses: 46
0%0
0%0100%46
Other
SpanishEnglish
31. What is the primary language you speak at home?
46Responses:
26%1213%637%1726%12
I do not have a mobile phoneSmartphone without Data
Smartphone with DataRegular Cell Phone
30. Do you have a cell phone or Smartphone?
32. What is your approximate annual household income?
Less than $15,000$14,999 to $24,999
$25,000 to $44,999$45,000 to $74,999
29 67%7 16%
1 2%0 0%
$75,000 to $99,999$100,000 or more
Don't know or prefer not to say
0 0%0 0%
6 14%
43Responses:
Summary p6 10/16/2018 1:29:55 PM
APPENDIX A
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
74
Appendix B: Needles Bus Stop Improvement List
NEEDLES TRANSIT SERVICES SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN DRAFT – NOVEMBER 2019
AMMA TRANSIT PLANNING
75
Appendix B: Needles Bus Stop Improvements List
Type Site # Comments Location Total Status
Shelter and Bench
Shelter and Bench X Library NB Bailey/NS J $14,506 Complete
Shelter and Bench 7 Recommended for Senior Center stop. NB Baily Ave. at Lily Hill Dr $14,506
Shelter and Bench 27 Stop needs boarding area Broadway at D St. $14,497 Complete
Signage
Sign post X Library needs sign NB Bailey/NS J $200 Complete
Sign post 16 Stop needs sign WB Broadway at E St. $200 Complete
Sign post 18 Stop needs sign WB Broadway at J St. $200 Complete
Sign post 30 Stop needs sign SB Broadway at Goodwill $200 Complete
New sign all 32 stops $1,120
Information laminate
fixtureall 32 stops
$2,560
Information laminate all 32 stops $160
Bus Stop Improvements/ ADA Accessibility
Improvements4
Boarding should be widened. Sign is partially
obscured by fence, needs taller post SB D St. at Cibola $6,804
Improvements9
Stop needs boarding area/possible relocation for
students WB Erin Dr. at Bailey Ave. $6,788
Improvements10
Access path needed to mobile home park west of stop WB Erin Dr. at Coronado $6,400 Complete
Improvements11 Access path needed to stop for wheelchairs, driver
picks up wheelchairs across the street SB Coronado at J St. $7,440 Complete
Improvements 12 Wheelchair curb ramp needed EB J St. at Civic Center $11,000 Complete
Improvements13
Need retaining wall for sliding dirt EB J St. at I-40 EB on-ramp $7,540
Stop
relocated
Improvements 19 Need sidewalk and curb ramp at corner NB Broadway at Market St. $13,020 Complete
Improvements20
Need sidewalk from south of corner and raised
boarding area SB Q St. at Needles Hwy. $8,974 Complete
Improvements 24 Stop needs boarding area path SB Broadway at Market $12,160 Complete
Improvements 28 Widen boarding area EB Broadway at A St. $6,628
Improvements 32 Wheelchair curb ramp needed and pave boarding area Dollar Tree Store $11,802
Repairs to Enhance Path-of-Access
Repairs 7 Tree root damage to access path NB Baily Ave. at Lily Hill Dr $0
Repairs 16/35 Sidewalk needs repair from stop west to corner WB Broadway at E St. $0
Repairs 18 Repair wheelchair curb ramp WB Broadway at J St. $5,216 Complete
Repairs 25 Repair boarding area and sidewalk EB Broadway at J St. $1,748 Complete
Bus Stop Relocation for ADA Accessibility or for Path-of-Access
Relocation
2 Relocate bus stop to far side of F St. closer to city
office EB 3rd St. at F St. $500
Relocation
21
Move sign so bus does not block driveway Needles Hwy. at U St. $500
Relocation
23 Relocate stop to suitable position east to farside R St.
between 2nd and 3rd driveways or westbound
Needles Hwy. farside of R St. in front of store EB Needles Hwy. at R St. $500
Relocation 26 Move stop post out from behind shelter EB Broadway at G St. $500
Relocation 31 Relocate to southbound Cherry farside Safari WB Safari Dr. at Cherry St. $12,308
Total $167,977Cost to improve remaining stops
(2015 dollars) $64,676
Estimated cost (FY 20/21 dollars) $72,836