Upload
connectica-lab
View
134
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prospective Cargo for NSR Transport
: From Korean Perspective
March 12th 2015, President hotel, MoscowTransport & Logistics in Arctic - 2015
Professor Sungwon Hong
Director, Institute of Arctic LogisticsYoungsan University, Busan, Korea
Contents
1. Introduction of IAL(Institute of Arctic Logistics)
2. Market Condition for NSR Transit
3. Evaluations on Korea-related NSR Transport
4. Potential Cargo Base from/to Korea
5. Stakeholders’ Position in Korea regarding NSR
6. Conclusion
2
Research project by IAL
Year Subject Funded by
2014 Sustainable use of NSR (ongoing) Ministry of Maritime and
Fisheries, Korea
2013Arctic resource development
and transportation to Asian market Korea Gas Corporation(KOGAS)
2012 Study on the Guideline regarding NSR shippingKorean Shipowners’Association
2011 Cargo transportation via Northern Sea RouteHanjin Shipping
: Yanghyun Foundation
2010 Management system of Northern Sea Route Korea Research Foundation
3Institute of Arctic Logistics
Seminars organized by IAL
Year Subjects Hosted by / Venue
2014.11.27 The 3rd International Arctic Shipping SeminarMinistry of Oceans and Fisheries,
and organized by IAL, Ulsan
2013.11 The 2nd International Arctic Shipping SeminarMinistry of Oceans and Fisheries
and organized by IAL, Busan
2011.11 The 1st International Arctic Shipping Seminarco-hosted by IAL & Ministry of
Oceans and Fisheries, Busan
2011.11The 5th Memorial Seminar for the Late Hanjin Shipping
Chairman, Cho Soohoorganized by IAL, Seoul
2011.6 Preventive Measures against Piracy Seminarco-hosted by IAL & Busan Coast
Guard, Busan)
2010.11 Seminar for the Commercial Operation on the NSRco-hosted by IAL & Hanjin
Shipping Co., Busan
4Institute of Arctic Logistics
2014 The 3rd International Arctic Shipping Seminar, Ulsan
5Institute of Arctic Logistics
2. Market condition for NSR transit
Driving Factors
1) Global oil prices falling
2) Asian LNG market
3) Decline of China’s economic growth expected
4) Russian Arctic resource development hindered by US/EU Sanctions
to Russia
5) Is NSR an alternative route to Suez canal?
6Institute of Arctic Logistics
2. Market condition for NSR transit
1) Current situation
One way transportation Uncertain profitability, necessity to secure return cargo
Major pattern of NSR traffic Liquid bulk transportation by price differences
Liquid bulk cargo market is currently too dynamic Competition between Middle east oil & U.S. shale gas
Impact to price of naphtha & condensate by Shale & oil sand production
Cargo owner Novatek’s spot business to Asian market sharply decreased
7Institute of Arctic Logistics
Market condition for NSR transit
2) Mid term prospect
Increase of Arctic hydrocarbon resources transportation(Yamal LNG Project: 16.5mil tons)
Increase of Russian domestic supply & intra trade along NSR
8[Source: James Henderson(2014), Skolkovo Energy Centre (2013)]
"Comparison of Russian gas Projects to Asian market with other global gas project"
Market condition for NSR transit
3) Long term prospect
Need to find routine cargoes for sustainable use of the NSR
①Arctic hydrocarbon resources Destinational transportation
: Liquid bulk transportation on spot market will be supplementary
② Need to find routine cargo via the NSR
: Necessity to develop general cargo transportation by container
shipping
9Institute of Arctic Logistics
3. Evaluations on Korea-related NSR Transportation
NSR Transit Results (Data: 2011-2013, Russian coastal trade excluded)
RussiaNorway
France
Japan
China
Korea
Thai
Singapore
Finland
Taiwan
North
Korea
Netherland
Denmark
Poland
Vietnam
Remarks: Cargo traffic in Asia(China, Korea & Japan), Two way transportation(Korea),Test shipping by vessel type
10Institute of Arctic Logistics
2013 NSR Transit
11
Transit type Vessel amount Cargo volume
Total 71 times 1,355,897tons
Russian intra trade & supply 43 times 237,861tons
International transit 28 times 1,118,036tons
- International transit(Laden voyage) on the NSR 19 times
* Bulk cargo: 17vessels* General cargo: 2 vessels
1,118,036tons
(82%)
- International transit between Europe and Asia 10 times(5 times: Korea)757,373tons
(56%)
- Ballast & Repositioning 9 times
[Source: IAL, Rosatomflot]
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Korea-related NSR Transport (2012-13)
One way transportation
Two way transportation
3 times in 2012 (Palva, Marika, Stena Poseidon)
1 time in 2013 (Propontis)
Pilot shipping on the NSR by Hyundai Glovis
Naphtha, 44 thousand tons (by Stena Polaris)
12
Gas condensate
Naphtha
Jet oil
Gas oil
Korea-relatedeastbound cargo on NSR
Korea-relatedwestbound cargo on NSR
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Korea-related cargo traffic on NSR (2013)
Vessel
nameShipowner
Ice class/Type
Cargo ownerCargo/
Qty(mt)Departure Arrival
Entry toNSR
Exit from NSR
Average speed(Knots)
MarinorMarinvest Shipping
ABArc4/tanker
JSC NovatekGas condens/
58,721Murmansk Daesan
2013.08.15 16:00
2013.08.2812:00
12.8
PropontisTaskos Columbia Shipmanagement
Arc4/tanker
JSC NovatekGasoil/
108,945Ulsan Rotterdam
2013.10.0606:00
2013.09.2511:45
10.8
Stena Polaris
Stena Bulk ABArc4/tanker
JSC NovatekNaphtha/
43,854Ust-Luga Yeosu 2013.09.28
17:202013.10.11
11:3012.8
ZalivAmurskiy
PRISCOIce2/tanker
JSC NovatekGasoil/
95,988Onsan Rotterdam
2013.10.1306:00
2013.09.3017:25
12.5
Viktor Bakaev
SCF NovoshipTechnical Manag-t
Ice2/tanker
Mansel oilKerosene/
88,024Yeosu Rotterdam
2013.10.2811:20
2013.10.1409:00
14.1
Zalvi Baikal PRISCOIce2/tanker
JSC NovatekNaphtha/
79,580Ust-Luga Yeosu
2013.10.1415:30
2013.10.3001:00
15.4
HHL Hong
KongHansa Heavy lift
Arc4/
heavy liftJSC “SMM” Cranes/
1,742Ust-Luga
Rajin(N.Korea)
2013.10.25
09:30- -
Atmoda Laskardis ShippingArc4/
reefer- Ballast Busan Iceland 2013.08.14
02:50
2013.07.26
16:3018.4
Arctic
AuroraFareastern shipping
Acr4/
LNG- Ballast Ulsan Hammerfest 2013.08.18
18:30
2013.08.06
23:3011..8
[Source : Rosatomflot 2013]
13Institute of Arctic Logistics
Considerably influenced by Cargo owners (esp. Novatek)
Naphtha & condensate import will be decreasing (not profitable)
Need to find potential cargo on long term contract bases
Accumulation of ice navigation experience needed for
Korean shipping company through pilot shipping on NSR
14
Evaluation of Korea-related NSR transit
2013: 182 thousand tons, 3times
2012: 365 thousand tons, 7 times
2011: 119 thousand tons, 2 times
2013: 293 thousand tons, 3times
2012: 198 thousand tons, 3 times
2011: 64 thousand tons, 1 time
Import of Naphtha & gas condensate
Export of Korean jet oil & Gas oil to Europe
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Pilot shipping on the NSR by Hyundai Glovis (Stena Polaris)
Ust-Luga
Entry to NSR
Exit from NSR
NSR Section
Yeosu
Pilot shipping
on the NSR
Sep 16(1 days)
Ust-Luga Russia
Sep 20(4 days)
Schou
Bunkering
Sep 25(9 days)
Kirkenes Ice pilot on board
Sep 28(12 days)
Entry to NSR
Oct 11(25 days)
Bering strait
Oct 21(35 days)
Yeosu
15Institute of Arctic Logistics
4. Potential Cargo Base from/to Korea
- Need to seek the most
promising routine cargoes ?
- Necessity of Analysis
for outbound cargo
- Long term contract
: Reliability of delivery
(Arctic Resource)
- Spot Biz : Occasionally
- Any off-season cargo?
Outbound cargo from Korea Inbound cargo to Korea
16Institute of Arctic Logistics
Cargo Base between Korea and EU
Analysis result of 2011 IAL’ research project (Hanjin)
Cargo analysis based on containerization rate and NSR Tariff
Promising cargo: coal, oil, LNG, steel scrap, motor vehicle, chemical, oil product
IAL’s Research Methodology
Bottom up approach- All cargoes by code
Transit cargo approach- Type of cargoes that have already been transported via NSR
Vessel track analysis- Two way vs One way
17Institute of Arctic Logistics
1) Bottom up approach
Top 10 cargoes
between EU and Korea
Motor Vehicle
Electric equipment
Boiler & Machinery
Fuel Oil & Energy
Iron, Steel & Plastic
Cargo base analysis by
HS or SITC code
KoreaEU
Motor Vehicle
Electric Equipment, TV, VTR
Machinery
Vessel
Optical, Medical, Inspection Tool
Plastic & Plastic products
Fuel, Energy
Iron & Steel
Rubber & Rubber products
Organic Chemical
Machinery
Fuel, Energy
Electric Equipment, TV, VTR
Motor Vehicle
Optical, Medical, Inspection Tool
Medical Products
Iron & Steel
Organic Chemical
Inorganic Chemical
Plastic & Plastic Products
18Institute of Arctic Logistics
Top 10 imports from EU(2013, over 200 thousand tons)
Passenger car 180thousand tons
60% of Korea imports
Pork 114 thousand tons
39% of Korean imports
Main imports are natural
resources
Food such as wheat, corn &
pork are imported
Each cargo will be analyzed
[Source: trass.kctdi.or.kr]
Name Amount(thou $) Weight(ton)
Naphtha 2,841,859 3,038,531
Crude oil 2,395,032 2,835,388
Wheat 208,934 735,519
Corn 222,782 647,885
Lumber 257,064 380,224
Organic compound 1,546,671 280,582
Coal 43,274 252,822
Scrap 177,041 239,284
Other chemical products 1,343,835 226,654
Other plastic 931,875 226,516
Other textiles 294,030 213,539
Gas 175,592 206,461
19Institute of Arctic Logistics
Top 10 Exports to EU(2013, over 200 thousand tons)
[Source: trass.kctdi.or.kr]
Name Amount(thou $) Weight(ton)
Other oil products 2,503,904 2,531,192
Vessel 5,739,850 1,774,723
Light oil 844,430 923,067
Alloy steel plate 948,971 877,980
Synthetic plastic & its products 1,640,098 637,080
Passenger car 5,736,779 578,572
Auto parts 3,616,008 439,833
Other general machineries 3,738,525 410,394
Organic & inorganic
compound874,125 336,599
Polyester 434,929 279,287
Steel plate 195,329 260,019
Synthetic fiber 338,756 209,028
Polyethylene 190thousand tons
Steel product (steel bar/section steel) 180 thousand tons
Rubber tire & tube 160thousand tons
Passenger car, truck, tire and auto parts are over 1.2 million tons
Various oil and chemical products are exported
Each cargo will be analyzed
20Institute of Arctic Logistics
2) Transit cargo approach
21
Naphtha: ‘Negative’ in the long term(production increase in Korea)
Gas condensate: ‘Negative’ (supply from U.S.)
LNG: ‘Positive’(Mid term/long term)
Jet fuel: maintaining present level
(difficult to increase)
Metal Scrap: Negative
(Supply and demand sufficient in
East Asia)
Iron ore: ‘Negative’ (short term)
(Lower iron ore price)
General cargo: ‘Positive’ (carrier’s pilot test)
Liquid Bulk Dry Bulk & General cargo
Institute of Arctic Logistics
3) Vessel Track Analysis Analysis of navigation routes of ice class vessels
Economic feasibility of ice class vessel operation
Cargo type, vessel type, market demand & supply
22
Nordic Odyssey(Bulk Carrier)
Singapore 9/12
10/18 Daesan 10/23
10/26 Taiwan 10/28
12/28 Thames 12/29
01/07 Ust Luga 01/16
Mailiao
03/07 Ulsan
Arctic Aurora(LNG Carrier)
Melkoya 09/17
10/5 Brazil 10/08
10/31 Melkoya 11/02
11/27 Turkey 11/28
12/16 Melkoya 12/18
12/23 Lituania 12/25
12/31 Melkoya 01/02
01/23 Brazil 01/26
02/02 Point Fortin 02/03
02/28 Quintero 03/01
Going to Las palmas
09/29 Netherland 10/02
10/07 Ust Luga 10/09
10/14 Denmark 10/17
10/21 Kokkola 10/23
10/24 Port Talbot 10/24
12/04 Canada 12/22
01/07 Barcelnona 01/15
01/29 Kamsar 01/30
Going to Canada
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Propontis(Tanker)
Arctic Aurora(LNG carrier)Destinational transportation from Norway to Brazil, Turkey, Lituania
23
Melkoya 9/17
10/05 Brazil 10/08
10/31 Melkoya 11/02
11/27 Turkey 11/28
12/16 Melkoya 12/18
12/23 Lituania 12/25
12/31 Melkoya 01/02
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Melkoya 09/17
10/5 Brazil 10/08
10/31 Melkoya 11/02
11/27 Turkey 11/28
12/16 Melkoya 12/18
12/23 Lituania 12/25
12/31 Melkoya 01/02
01/23 Brazil 01/26
02/02 Point Fortin 02/03
02/28 Quintero 03/01
Going to Las palmas01/23 Brazil 01/268
02/02 Point Fortin 02/039
02/28 Quintero 03/0110
Potential cargo of Korea in Arctic Trade
Incheon
Daesan
Ulsan
Yeosu
Busan
Promising cargo
Seoul
Pohang
Iron ore(Pohang), coal, steel scrap(Incheon), chemical products, fertilizer
Import
Steel products (Pohang), finished vehicle (Ulsan), heavy cargo
Export
24Institute of Arctic Logistics
Oil trading (Ulsan Port : Tank Terminals)
Name of the TerminalStorage Capacity
(10,000 bbl)
Jeongil Stolthaven Ulsan 748.8
Vopak Terminals Korea 172.8
Taeyoung Industry 157.8
Odfjell Terminals Korea 197.4
Horizon Taeyoung Korea Terminals 146.2
North East Tank Terminal 125.2
Hyosung Onsan Tank Terminal 15.7
Onsan Tank Terminal 61.6
G-Hub(SK Gas) 308.3
Hyundai Oil Terminal 163.6
TOTAL 2,097
[Independent Tank Terminals]
The Port of Ulsan has several world-famous petroleum companies
25Institute of Arctic Logistics
Potential industry/cargo through NSR
Shipbuilding
• Ice class vessel
• Offshore plants
Heavy cargo
• Marine equipment,
offshore plant facilities
etc.
Marine service
Articles for ship,
Bunkering, ship repair
Automotive industry
• Transportation of finished
vehicle to European market
Resources
• Import: Gas condensate,
Naphtha, iron ore, LNG, coal
• Export: Jet oil, diesel oil
26Institute of Arctic Logistics
Yamal Arctic LNG Carrier by DSME
Package Section Vessel type Remark
Package I Asia~N/Europe SPB Megaline
Package II N/Europe~Yamal SiteIcebreaking
SPB
New
shipbuilding
Package I
• 8 vessels fixed
Package II
• Year round navigable vessels, (2 vessels fixed)
Package by route of Project transportation
Heavy cargo transportation by Megaline(Yamal LNG Plant)
28
Arc-7 Class carrier for special cargo
Ice class vessel for Heavy cargo transportation (Megaline)
29
Case 1. Departure from Korea via Bering Sea
: Vladivostok (T/S Customs) → Yamburg Port or Novy Port (T/S Operation to River Barge)
→ River Jetty → Trailer → Pavlodar
Vladivostok
Yamburg PortNovy Port
NovosibirskOmsk
Pavlodar
Busan
Deep Sea
Legend
River
Heavy Cargo Transportation by UnicoLogistics
30Institute of Arctic Logistics
5. Stakeholders’ Position in Korea
Government’s Strong Support
Logistics Company’sViewpoint
(Shippers’ Approval)
Shippers’ Viewpoint(On time Delivery,
Safety)
Ship owners’ Viewpoint
(Difficulty of securing cargo)
Limitation to Active Use of NSR
31Institute of Arctic Logistics
Prospective cargoes of Korean stakeholders
32
Oil Product
PetrochemicalsMarine Plant
Gas Condensate
Machinery(electronic
goods)
Cargo owners/Logistics companies
Petrochemicals
Marine Plant
Gas Condensate
Steel
Automobile
Automobile components
Ship owners
Cargo owners interested in machinery transport (ex. electronic goods)
vs. ship owners interested in steel products & car transport
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Reasons why shipowners/cargo ownersavoid navigation on the NSR
33
Safety of Vessel
Navigation
Difficulty of On-time Delivery
Uncertain Profitability
High Tariff &
Insurance
Difficulty of Routine
Navigation
Cargo owners
Uncertain Profitability
Difficulty of routine
Navigation
Securing Vessel
Space/Cargo owners’ Refusals
Shipowners
Cargo owners : Safety of navigation
Shipowners : Uncertain profitability & securing vessel space
Institute of Arctic Logistics
2) Stakeholders’ Position in KoreaKorean Government’s plan (Dec, 2013)
(Maritime Logistics part)
Port incentive 50% exemption of domestic port dues for the vessels via NSR (Jan, 2014)
Partnership between shipper and shipowner Organization of consultative body to share NSR information and build
cooperative relationship among government, shippers, shipowners and
research institutions
Crew training for Arctic shipping
Strengthening of cooperation with Arctic coastal countries
34Institute of Arctic Logistics
35
Economic feasibility of NSR
shipping(Return cargo)
Securing routine cargo(Lack of cargo information)
Safety of Navigation(Sea ice condition, ice chart)
Prior preparation(destinational shipping, NSR information)
Korean Shipowners’Position
Concern for on-time delivery
Reduction of logistics cost
Safety and risk management on
the NSR
Wait and see attitude
Korean Shippers’ Position
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Logistics company & Shipbuilder
Interest in NSR shipping, need for more information on NSR
Profitability of NSR uncertain compared to Suez & TSR
36
The steel cutting ceremony for Hull
No. 2418, DSME’s first LNG carrier
in the Yamal project (Sep 29 2014)
This vessel is the world’s first
icebreaking LNG carrier
DSME’s first LNG carrier in the Yamal project
Institute of Arctic Logistics
6. Conclusion
One way transportation
Liquid bulk transportation by price differences(arbitrage)
Cargo owners’ profitability?
Liquid bulk cargo market too dynamic
37
Hydrocarbon resource(liquid bulk), mineral resource from Arctic region
Securing of routine cargo on the NSR(e.g.: destinational transport/Yamal, general cargo by container ship)
Economic feasibility analysis
Joint cooperation between ship owners & cargo owners for invigorating NSR
Increase of cargo traffic on NSR will be good for all the stakeholders
1. Market condition for NSR transportation
2. Cargo analysis
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Challenges
38
1) Shipping company/Shipper
Profitability still uncertain
Securing routine cargo for NSR shipping
On-time delivery and safety of NSR shipping
Exact information regarding NSR shipping & Arctic trading
2) Government
Cooperation between shippers and shipowners
Crew training for Arctic shipping
Ship financing for preparing ice class vessel
3) IAL-CHNL Joint research
Bilateral efforts to invigorate usages of the NSR through the sharing of information and experiences in the maritime transportation via the NSR
Assessment of economic feasibility regarding NSR shipping
Korean stakeholders
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Challenges
39
Maritime transport to facilitate the Northern Sea Route
- Joint efforts for sharing information and experiences in the maritime
transportation via the NSR
: Arctic business opportunities, Ice class vessel chartering, NSR operation
experience, sea ice condition, icebreaker capability, tariff, etc
Organizing seminars, conferences & workshops
Strengthening cooperation to establish maritime infrastructures to facilitate
commercial shipping on the NSR
International cooperation
Institute of Arctic Logistics
Thank you