Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUMMER STUDIO CHRISTCHURCH 2013
PROJECT: T H E C R E A T I V E C O R N E R
PRELIMINARY BRIEF
Dushko Bogunovich & Jeanette Budgett
Dept of Architecture, UNITEC, Auckland
January 2013
The studio will run in two parts, each two weeks long. Dushko will lead the first two
weeks, from 7 to 21 January, and Jeanette will lead the second two weeks, from 21
January to 1 February. The first part is about urban design, the second about
architecture.
PART ONE (the first 2 weeks, ending with the 2nd interim crit on 18 Jan) A CONCEPT MASTER PLAN FOR THE GREEN FRAME’s S.E. CORNER – the ‘Knuckle’.
This is the 200 x 200 m city block between Manchester and Madras, and Lichfield and
St Asaph Streets. This block has been designated as the ‘Innovation Precinct’ in the
CCRP (Chch Central Recovery Plan, July 2012). Our studio will further this proposition
by adding a green slant on the innovation agenda – this will be an Eco-innovation
Precinct’. Our approach will be based on a quick investigation of four issues:
1. Green Knowledge Economy as the driver of Recovery;
2. Urban Form - the Plan, the Grid, the Frame and the Corners
3. Cultural Identity: heritage&character vs technology&efficiency;
4. The Programme: working, learning, living, playing in one place
We will argue for the retention of the remaining heritage/character buildings and
places, while also pushing for a radically contemporary and seriously green
architectural and landscape treatment of all new structures. We will also aim to
integrate open space (landscape) and buildings (architecture) in a manner that
enhances the sustainability and resilience of the future city. Our design will itself be an
example of what the future Eco-innovation Precinct tenants do for living – innovate in
the realm of green technology (for example, smart irrigation technology, or wind
power generation).
One particularly promising line of investigation could be choosing the ‘agri-tech’ theme
as the key exponent of the innovation&technology driver in the design process, while
arguing that this at the same time is a reference to the Canterbury region’s pre-eminent
farming role in NZ.
The resulting juxtaposition of the new and the old; the symbiosis of the buildings and
the natural cycles; and the integration of living, learning, working and playing, should
result in a new home for those Chch businesses who share the focus on green
economy, sustainable design and clean technology. The revived he Precinct will then
re-connects the CPIT campus – a significant pool of T&R facilities and talent - with the
new, compact CBD. High St will recover its former glory and become ‘the smartest
street in Christchurch’.
KEY OUTPUTS: An Urban Design Strategy (1:1000/500) at the end of the 1st week; a
Concept Master Plan, with a selected preferred site for the Building, at the end of the
2nd week.
FORMAT: diagrams; sketches; physical models; PPP/slide presentation.
TEAM WORK: groups of 3 or 4 students will deliver one project.
PART TWO (the second 2 weeks, ending with the Final Crit): CONCEPT DESIGN FOR AN “E-HUB” – a work+live+play type of building, or building
complex, where creative workers and support staff work in an unconventional
office/lab/studio atmosphere. The occupants primarily ‘work’ here, but because their
work is about creativity, imagination and innovation, this means it all goes together with
a lot of play, socialising, recreation and, for a small number, even residing on the site
(at least some of the time). Besides exploring the future of downtown living in an (eco-
knowledge economy, the project will interrogate the concepts of ‘heritage’ and
‘character’ in Chch’s extraordinary circumstances. We will aim at a visual and functional
symbiosis of ‘the old and the new’ in a manner that enhances the identity, continuity
and memory in the Old while giving full freedom to the New to push boundaries of
design and technology, rather than meshing the Old and the New into a forced
compromise.
KEY OUTPUTS: An Architectural Design (1:200/100) at the end of the 3rd week; a
complete urban context at the end of the 2nd week.
FORMAT: diagrams; sketches; physical models; PPP/slide presentation.
TEAMS of 3 or 4 students deliver one project.
PROJECT STAGES: Week One: Contextual Research
Week Two: Urban Design/Master Planning
Week Three: Architectural Design
Week Four: Presentation&Production
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: • The Research - robust, comprehensive, relevant research
• The Master Plan Resolution – balance between pragmatic and visionary; old and new
• The Architectural Resolution – expressive, functional, structural, environmental
• Communication – clear, accurate, compact, effective, original
INITIAL READING: http://ccdu.govt.nz/ http://www.christchurch.org.nz/ http://www.cdc.org.nz/ http://www.futurechristchurch.co.nz/breathe http://studiochristchurch.co.nz/ http://www.waterfrontauckland.co.nz/Waterfront-Auckland/Pages/ProjectUpdatesInside.aspx?ID=11 http://www.aiatopten.org/taxonomy/term/7 http://www.archdaily.com/310599/renovation-and-reconstruction-of-the-castle-of-novara-studio-zermani-e-associati/ http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=21457&q=Louviers http://www.archdaily.com/194397/salt-building-acton-ostry-architects/ http://www.eebhub.org/
SITE IMAGES