Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Summative Process
Facilitators:Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (NKCES)
Charles Rutledge, PGES Consultant (KEDC)
Network: leadershipPassword: kasa2015
For Today…Intended Outcome: Confidence in determining an effective process for putting the pieces of TPGES together.
Vehicle for Information: Use data and evidence, as well as professional judgment, to determine a teacher’s professional practice rating, SGG rating, and Overall Performance Rating
Processing the Learning: Individual thinking, Small group discussions, Large group sharing
Session Resources &
Group Share Out PollsNetwork:
leadershipPassword: kasa2015
Vignette and PGP
Your Task
Please read Page ONE (1) ONLY of the Vignette.
Then read through the PGP and consider the questions on the following slide…
Questions to Consider:
How did the self-reflection and SGG inform the PGP?
How was the principal time-efficient in this beginning process? (Page 1 only)
How could this part of the summative process be more effective? (Page 1 only)
Share your thoughts with an elbow-partner.
Read Information for Observations
1 & 2
Pp 2-3 of Vignette;Post Obs 1 & 2
Questions to Consider:
What are the notable similarities or differences between the 2 observations and conferences?
Based on the individual component ratings, how do you determine the overall ratings for each domain, at the end of each post-observation conference?
Final, Full Observation
Please read page 4 of the Vignette and the Conferencing information given for Observation 3.
What are the notable similarities or differences between the observations and conferences?
How do the observations, conferences, PGP, Self-reflection, SGG, and student voice data inform the Professional Practice Rating?
Category Favorable Responses
Support 72%
Transparency
72%
Understand 68%
Discipline 65%
Engage 45%
Nurture 76%
Trust 67%
Average Overall Score: 66%
Using a Summative Data Form
SGG Data
Goal: 60% will reach proficiency and 100% will grow at least 2 levels
End-of-Year SGG:
55% reached proficiency
80% grew at least 2 levels
Proficiency
Rating Goal Achievement
High (3) Exceeds +10% of goal
Expected (2) Is within +/- 10% of goal
Low (1) Exceeds -10% form goal
Growth
Rating Goal Achievement
High (3) 90 – 100% of students meet goal.
Expected (2) Between 80 and 90% of students meet goal
Low (1) Less than 80% of students meet goal
