Summary Judgment Disputed Stmt of Facts

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Summary Judgment Disputed Stmt of Facts

    1/4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Michael Scott Ioane257 E. Bellevue Road, #188Atwater, CA 95301(775) 841-1776

    Plaintiff In Pro Per

    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    COUNTY OF KERN METROPOLITAN DIVISION

    MICHAEL SCOTT IOANE,

    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    TREBLE, LLC, and ROBERT E. BELL,

    Defendants.

    )

    ))))))))))))

    CASE NO. S-1500-CV-269076-WPD

    PLAINTIFFS SEPARATESTATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TODEFENDANTS SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

    DATE: March 29, 2012TIME: 8:30 amDEPT: 15TRIAL: April 30, 2012

    Pursuant to CCP 437c (b)(3), plaintiffs submit this statement in opposition to

    defendants Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts:

    Defendants Material Facts Plaintiffs Response, Material Facts &

    And Alleged Supporting Evidence: Supporting Evidence

    1. Treble, Bell, and Mariposa Holdings, Inc

    entered into a Settlement Agreement and

    Mutual Release of Claims (the

    Agreement) on June 9, 2009.

    Undisputed. It should further be noted that

    Southern Financial was not a party to the

    Agreement.

    2. On or about June 12, 2009 Treble and

    Bell submitted their first installment

    Undisputed.

    1PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT

  • 7/31/2019 Summary Judgment Disputed Stmt of Facts

    2/4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    payment of $5000 under the terms of the

    agreement.

    3. On June 16, 2009 Revenue Officer

    Michael Hoos served Treble and Bell with a

    Notice of Levy to attach the funds

    originally invested in Treble, LLC by

    Southern Financial Services [predecessor in

    interest to Mariposa Holdings, Inc.]

    Undisputed, except no evidence exists that

    any funds originally invested in Treble,

    LLC by Southern Financial Services

    existed at that time (or any other).

    4. Treble and Bell, through counsel,

    forwarded a copy of the Notice of Levy to

    Mariposa via U.S. mail and Mariposa

    indirectly acknowledged receipt of said

    Levy through reply correspondence.

    Undisputed that the Notice of Levy was

    forwarded to Mariposa. Disputed as to

    whether any levy was actually put into

    effect since no notice of seizure exists (as

    required under 26 U.S.C. 6502(b)).

    5. Since receiving the Notice of Levy,

    Treble has been making monthly

    installment payments to the Internal

    Revenue Service and as of December 2011,

    the Internal Revenue Service has received a

    total of $55,000 from Treble, LLC pursuant

    to the Notice of Levy.

    Disputed. See objections to Hoos and Bell

    Declarations

    Additional Material Facts Supporting Evidence

    6. Since Southern Financial never actually

    acquired any membership in Treble, LLC, a

    See 6 of Settlement Agreement attached to

    Bell Decl.

    2PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT

  • 7/31/2019 Summary Judgment Disputed Stmt of Facts

    3/4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    material fact exists as to whether it ever had

    any funds invested in Treble, LLC.

    7. On December 23, 2005, whatever

    interest Southern Financial may have had

    in Treble, LLC (if any) was sold to

    Mariposa Holdings. At this time, any

    interest Southern Financial may have had

    in Treble was presumptively terminated,

    and could not have possibly existed in June

    2009. Although the terms of the sale are

    not disclosed, any funds Southern Financial

    may have submitted to Treble would

    presumptively have been returned to

    Southern Financial by Mariposa.

    Bell Decl, 3, Settlement Agreement 7

    Date: March 5, 2012 Submitted by,

    _________________________________Michael Scott Ioane

    3PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT

  • 7/31/2019 Summary Judgment Disputed Stmt of Facts

    4/4

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL

    I, _____________________, declare that I am at least 18 years of age, and not a

    party to the suit. My address is ____________________, _____________, __________.

    I hereby certify the attached PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN

    OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION was served on

    the following by enclosing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope with

    postage fully prepaid, and depositing same in the United States mail, addressed as

    follows:

    JOSEPH P. HANSON5001 California Ave., Ste 219

    Bakersfield, CA 93309(Attorney for defendants)

    I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed

    on ____________, 2012 at _____________, California.

    _________________________________

    4PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT