Sulfuric acid double contact

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    1/6

    M O L T O X ~ CHEMICAL AIR

    SEPARATION

    SYSTEM

    - A PROGRESS

    REPORT

    Donald C.

    Er1ckson

    Energy

    Concepts

    Co.

    Annapo11s, Maryland

    W111iam

    R.

    Brown

    and

    Br1an

    R.

    Dunbobb1n

    A1r

    Products

    and

    Chem1ca1s,

    Inc.

    Allentown, Pennsy1van1a

    Robert G.

    Massey

    U.S. Department of

    Energy

    Wash1ngton,

    D.C.

    ABSTRACT

    A

    new

    low energy route to tonnage

    oxygen

    product1on, the O L T O X ~ system, 1s now

    commenc1ng

    p110t plant test1ng. The process,

    1ts h1story, and potent1a1 app11cat10ns will

    be

    descr1bed, 1n add1t1on to recent results of the

    p110t

    plant

    test

    program. Future development

    needs and plans for commerc1a11zat10n w111 be

    outlined.

    INTRODUCTION

    More than 300,000 TI of large tonnage

    cryogen1c

    oxygen

    plant capac1ty was bu11t 1n the

    1960's

    and

    1970's. The two-th1rds st111

    operating w111 consume about $20 b11110n (1985

    ) of electr1cal energy 1n the next decade. The

    HOLTOX

    m

    chem1ca1

    a1r separat10n system

    1s

    being developed as a cryogen1c oxygen plant

    replacement wh1ch w111 use energy

    at

    less than

    one-half of th1s

    rate.

    A1r separation by cryogen1c d1st111at10n was

    1ntroduced

    90

    years

    ago

    by

    Carl

    von

    L1nde

    of

    Germany

    and cont1nues to be the choice for

    tonnage

    oxygen

    production. Current des1gns

    requ1re 25

    less

    energy than plants

    built

    in the

    1960's

    and

    1970's. The HOLTOX chemical air

    separat10n system is being developed to offer a

    lower

    cost

    oxygen

    a1ternat1ve for

    new oxygen

    requ1rements by revolutionary rather than

    evo1ut1onary development. The process requires

    up to

    40

    less energy use than today's

    commerc1al oxygen technology. This translates

    into a five to th1rty percent reduct10n in

    oxygen cost. This 1ncludes both cap1tal and

    energy

    costs.

    In

    1979,

    Donald C.

    Er1ckson of

    Energy

    Concepts

    Company

    received the first

    of

    several U.s.

    patents for a chemical a1r separation process

    for tonnage

    oxygen

    product10n.(1) Th1s new

    method of

    produc1ng

    oxygen

    uses a molten m1xture

    * HOlTOX

    1s

    a trademark of

    A1r

    Products

    and

    Chemicals Inc.

    of

    a1ka11

    n1trates

    and nitr1tes to

    chem1ca11y

    react w1th oxygen 1n

    compressed

    a1r.

    Heat1ng or

    depressur1zation then

    releases oxygen of greater

    than

    99.8%

    pur1ty

    1n

    a revers1ble react10n. The

    major port10n of the energy

    used

    to compress or

    heat the a1r 1s recovered

    from

    the waste

    nitrogen exhaust.

    With support

    from

    the U.S. Department

    of

    Energy, Mr. Er1ckson proved his concept 1n a

    bench-scale unit that produced 6 liters per

    m1nute

    of oxygen.(2)

    In

    1982 Air Products

    and

    Chem1cals, Inc., in a cost-shar1ng,

    cooperative agreement w1th the U.S. Department

    of Energy, undertook the cont1nu1ng development

    of the process,

    now known

    as the MOlTOX

    oxygen

    system.

    Dur1ng Task

    1, laboratory support

    stud1es provided technical 1nformat10n on molten

    nitrate/n1tr1te

    chem1stry

    and

    on the corros10n

    res1stance of mater1a1s of construct10n.(3)

    In January 1985, the dec1s10n was made to

    proceed

    w1th

    Task

    2, the construct10n

    and

    operat10n of a 0.25 ton per

    day oxygen

    p110t

    plant. This

    $6 m11110n,

    four-year project

    1s

    enter1ng 1ts

    f1na1

    year w1th commencement of

    p110t plant

    test1ng. The

    twelve

    month

    p110t

    plant exper1menta1 plan

    first calls

    for 'Proof

    of

    Concept' operat1onal confirmation

    and

    then

    for acquisition of engineer1ng design data for

    scale-up

    and

    optimization for the next

    development phase.

    PROCESS

    DESCRIPTION

    The MOLTOX system is based on the reversible

    react10n of

    oxygen

    with

    sod1um

    and

    potassium

    nitrite

    to

    form nitrate.

    This reaction

    can

    be

    used

    in

    one

    or both of

    two HOLTOX

    system

    salt

    loop types, Pressure Swing Absorption (PSA)

    and

    Thermal Swing

    Absorpt1on (TSA). The basic

    operating modes

    are:

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    2/6

    1. PSA - (PRESSURE SWING ABSORPTION)

    1.

    Pure

    Pressure

    Swing

    - For 1ntegrat10n w1th

    the pressur1zed gases

    of gas turb1ne power

    plants.

    2.

    Pure Thermal Swing - For 1ntegrat10n with

    the heat recovery and

    steam generation

    section of

    industrial

    and utility

    steam

    boilers.

    2.

    TSA -

    (TEMPERATURE SWING

    ABSORPTI0r-N,"-)--+-_"",

    3. Combined Pressure

    For any application

    and Thermal Swing

    in wh1ch heat

    and

    pressure energy are

    avallable.

    Simplified process diagrams of the two salt

    loop types are shown 1n F1gure 1. These

    d1agrams show the absorber and desorber salt

    flows, the gaseous a1r

    and

    product flows,

    and

    the integrat10n of the salt loop w1th external

    processes. For e1ther type of MOlTOX system

    I

    salt

    loop, dry,

    C02

    free a1r enters the

    I

    absorber

    at

    a temperature of

    783

    to

    922K

    (950 to

    I

    (950F)

    1200F)

    and

    a pressure of 0.41 to 1.2

    MPa

    (60 to

    I

    186

    ps1a)

    and 1s

    contacted with the molten

    =

    INTEGRATION

    I

    O

    MEANS WITH

    -c;;z-joABSORBER

    salt.

    The oxygen

    reacts chem1cally w1th the

    EXTERNAL

    salt (N02

    +

    1/202

    N03)

    and

    1s removed w1th

    PROCESS

    the salt from the bottom of the absorber. The

    Figure 1

    n1trogen

    and

    1nert gases, along with some

    Integrated

    l T X ~ System

    Salt

    loop

    un

    reacted oxygen, are

    removed

    from the top of

    the absorber

    at

    essentially the same pressure

    EXISTING

    and

    temperature as they entered. The molten

    500

    CRYOGENIC

    salt

    from

    the absorber flows to the desorber

    0,

    PLANT(S)

    where the chem1cal reaction 1s reversed

    (N03

    N02

    + 1/202),

    and

    gaseous oxygen

    is

    released from the salt

    and

    removed

    as

    product.

    400

    The reversal of the chemical reaction in the

    The

    salt 1s

    c1rculated around th1s

    TSA

    loop by a

    Cl

    100

    a:

    pump

    operat1ng

    at

    the

    783K

    (950F) salt

    LU

    temperature.

    z

    LU

    For

    the PSA salt loop, the pressure of the

    o

    L ~ 2 4 L . . . . . L 6 . . . J 8 1

    molten salt from the absorber is reduced across

    the pressure letdown valve before the salt

    HEAT EXPORT (MM BTU/TN 0,

    enters the desorber.

    The

    pressure of the

    desorber is controlled by the gaseous oxygen

    ' - - -MOLTOX

    PROCESS TYPE--

    pressure through a vacuum oxygen compressor.

    PRESSURE

    THERM L

    The salt 1s removed from the desorber by a salt.

    SWING

    SWING

    pump and

    rec1rculated

    back

    to the absorber

    at

    F1gure 2 -

    Energy

    Advantage for Integ ated

    the necessary pressure for recontact with M O L T O X ~ Cases vs.

    Cryogen1c

    Plants

    compressed a1r.

    497

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    3/6

    l1mlted heat aval1abl11ty for certaln TSA

    HOlTOX process app11catlons led to the

    deve10pmentof p ~ o s s des1gns for

    ccimblned

    PSA/TSA and. TSA/PSA HOlTOX

    systems/:F1gure 2

    graphIcally summar1

    zes

    the

    des19n flex1bll l tyof

    these

    HOllOX

    systems

    by

    show1ng

    the

    total

    energy

    requIred per ton.of

    oxygen

    versus the heat

    1nput/output for the var10u( desIgns. The

    thermal

    slo/1ng

    HOllOX system ut1l1zes the

    least

    net energy and cogenerates steam. Th1s f1gure

    also

    shows that

    the net energy requ1red for

    HOlTOX

    system

    oxygen

    production

    1s

    substant1a11y

    below that for the cryogen1c process. Exlst1ng

    plants

    were

    largely bul1t 1n the

    1960

    to

    1973

    perlod

    and

    requlre ln excess of

    450 KW

    per ton

    of oxygen,

    whl1e new oxygen

    cryogen1c plants

    can

    be

    deslgned for about

    350 KW

    per ton of

    oxygen.

    POTENTIAL HARKETS

    Electrlc

    power

    ls forecast to cost 7.5t/kwh

    (1985 $)

    ln the U.S. ln the mld-1990 s, when the

    MOLT

    OX system will

    be

    commercialized. The

    MOlTOX oxygen system ls projected to

    be most

    competitive

    wheresignlficant

    process heat

    lntegration

    can be

    achleved. for

    most

    app11cations, a 30 to

    40%

    reduction ln

    total

    energy 1s anticlpated,

    compared

    to new

    e1ectrlc

    drlve cryogenlc plants. Slnce

    65%

    of the cost

    of oxygen from cryogenic plants 1s energy

    related, use of the

    HOlTOX

    system results 1n a

    projected

    12

    to 23% improvement over new

    cryogenIc plants. This

    HOlTOX

    system

    oxygen

    cost improvement ls shown graphically in

    Figure 3.

    70

    60

    i=

    SO

    0

    C l

    U

    Z

    UJ

    Cl

    40

    x

    0

    30

    20

    2

    4 6 B 10 12

    ELECTRIC ENERGY COST /kwh)

    Flgure 3 -

    Oxygen

    Cost

    Comparison

    $600

    psia,

    9 9 5 ~

    Purity

    (l)New

    1000

    T/o Plant;

    . .

    15 Year,

    100%

    Capacity,

    340 o/Yr

    98

    Figure 3 also

    shows oxygen

    ~ o s t s from

    ex1st1ng (circa 1960/73) fUlly depreclated

    cryogenlc

    oxygen

    plants. Replacement of

    exlsting cryogenlc o x ~ g e n p1antsservlng the

    steel and

    chem.iea

    1 1ndustries represents

    one

    1mportant market opportunity

    ..

    A

    good example

    ls

    lntegrat10n with-blast furnace off-gas boilers

    at

    integrated steel mi11s.(4)

    Twenty

    percent

    of the offgas to the existlng bol1ers ls

    dlverted to a

    new

    steam/salt

    heater bol1er

    at

    the

    HOlTOX oxygen

    plant.

    The

    remaining 80% is

    burned in the existing bol1ers, whlch

    results

    ln

    lower stack temperature and

    more

    steam

    generation. Thls HOlTOX plant could supply

    approximately half of

    an

    lntegrated steel ml11 s

    oxygen

    requirements, whl1e reduclng the ml11 s

    electrical energy consumptlon.

    Emerging

    new

    oxygen

    markets also are

    candidates for

    MOLTOX

    process

    lntegratlon.

    Several applications (oxygen enrichment of coal

    for furnaces and bol1ers, refinery fluidized

    cat-cracker

    catalyst

    regenerators, sulfur

    recovery plants,

    and oxygen

    secondary reforming)

    have

    sufficient

    heat available to provide the

    entire

    energy requirements for a

    HOlTOX

    TSA

    plant.

    New

    applications with very large oxygen

    requirements (coal gaslficatlon for synfuels

    and/or combined cycle power generation; and

    coal-based direct smelting of iron) have enough

    available heat to provide for a combination

    HOlTOX TSA/PSA plant.

    PILOT PLANT

    In

    January

    1985

    the declsion was

    made

    to

    proceed with

    Task

    2, for the construction

    and

    operation of the

    pilot

    plant. The areas of

    technical uncertalnty to

    be

    addressed

    by

    pl10t

    plant operation include:

    TSA/PSA and TSA modes of operatlon

    Salt

    losses (vapor, corrosion,

    salt

    stabllay)

    Absorption/desorption kinetics

    Salt

    loop equipment designs

    Adequacy of materials of construction

    Long-term operability,

    and

    Gas purity, impurities,

    and

    by-products.

    Consideration of the above objectives led to

    the p110t plant depleted in the slmp11fled

    process flow diagram

    shown

    in Flgure 4. Thls

    flowsheet includes a slngle absorber, a slng1e

    desorber, a

    salt pump,

    a

    salt

    cooler,

    and

    a

    salt/salt heat exchanger. Thls equtpment ls

    sufflcient

    to

    test

    all

    key

    parts of the thermal

    swing

    HOLTOX

    process.

    The materials of constructlon for the pilot

    plant were selected based on corroslon test

    results from Task 1.(3,5) Our

    estlmate of the

    maximum

    use temperature for

    common

    engineering

    alloys is given below.

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    4/6

    Alloy

    Maximum Use

    Temperature

    Carbon

    Steel

    840F

    316 SS

    1150F

    Incoloy 800

    1250F

    Inconel 600

    1300F

    The p110t plant s1mp11f1ed flow d1agram

    shows

    expected operat1ng temperatures along

    w1th

    the recommended mater1als.

    The

    p110t plant w111 allow further study of

    the corros1veness of the

    salt. The

    corros10n

    w111

    be mon1tored

    w1th

    v1sual and ultrason1c

    thickness measurements of vessels and p1p1ng;

    1nstallat10n of corros10n

    coupon

    racks and

    corros10n probes; and

    1nstallat10n

    of

    p1pe

    spools of test mater1als. The mater1als

    be1ng

    tested are those that can w1thstand hot,

    oxid1zing cond1tions

    and

    1nclude sta1nless

    steels

    and h1gh nickel alloys wh1ch have shown

    good performance in ear11er bench

    scale

    corros10n

    tests. Bulk

    n1ckel alum1n1de

    alloy,

    developed by Oak R1dge Nat10nal Laboratory,

    and

    FECRALLOY steels, developed by Harwell 1n the

    U.K., are both cons1dered strong cand1dates for

    serv1ce

    1n

    the h1gher corros10n areas of the

    un1t. Ceramics, such

    as h1gh

    dens1ty fused

    alum1na and z1rcon1a,

    are also

    under study, as

    are var10us coat1ng techn1ques. Of part1cular

    interest

    are alum1niz1ng, MCrA Y and N1-Al

    coatings.

    The p110t

    plant w11l

    allow

    tests

    under salt flow cond1t10ns that resemble

    commerc1al operations. Salt

    samples w111 be

    taken per10d1cally to mon1tor salt chem1stry and

    corrosion product accumulat10n.

    The

    proposed t1metable for the f1rst twelve

    months

    of p110t plant operat10n 1s shown

    on

    the

    Exper1mental Plan (F1gure 5 .

    Th1s

    t1metable 1s

    broken into three phases. Phase

    A,

    Proof of

    Concept,

    w111

    demonstrate steady-state operat10n

    of the absorber/desorber comb1nat10n

    at

    a s1ngle

    cond1tion for a long per10d of

    t1me

    (durab111ty

    run). This w11l also ver1fy the des1gn 02

    production rates, product pur1t1es,

    and

    energy

    consumpt10n; and w111 determ1ne the

    rate

    of

    corros10n

    1n

    various

    parts

    of the

    absorber/desorber system. Phase

    B,

    Opt1m1zat10n, w111 probe the poss1b111ty of

    1mproved process economlcs at more severe

    operat1ng cond1t10ns. Phase

    C,

    Parametr1c

    Stud1es, w111 def1ne the

    effects

    of the major

    process var1ables, 1nclud1ng absorber pressure,

    desorber pressure, absorber 1nlet temperature,

    and

    molten salt circulat10n rate/a1r feed

    rate;

    and prov1de the eng1neer1ng data needed for

    scaleup and des1gn of the sem1works plant.

    PILOT

    PLANT

    RESULTS

    The p110t

    plant started up 1n

    March 1986.

    The 1nstrumentat10n and mechanical operat10n

    were

    checked and the Run I absorber column

    hydrau11c tests

    showed

    that the column could

    operate

    successfully

    at des1gn cond1t10ns

    w1thout flooding the column.

    Sod1um perox1de catalyst was added to t e

    salt

    and

    the low temperature oxygen generat on

    tr1als

    of Run II began.

    The

    plant ach1eved 0.12

    T/D of oxygen product10n with 99.9 02

    purity. Th1s

    Is

    92

    of the theoret1cal

    (equ111brum) 02 recovery for the 1130F

    desorber and 930F absorber operat1ng

    temperatures.

    The un1t performed well for 4 days, at ~ h c h

    t1me

    the

    316

    sta1nless

    steel

    centr1fugal

    fa11ed due to corrosion, cav1tation or a i

    comb1nat10n of these processes . A redes1gned

    pump

    with a

    low

    cavitat10n potent1al impellrr

    and Inconel 600 mater1als of construct10n

    WpS

    ordered, and

    an

    exper1mental program was

    developed to separate the

    effects

    of c a v t a ~ n

    and

    corros10n 1n the

    pump.

    This program

    was

    undertaken and completed 1n May 1986.

    As of May 28 1986, the p110t plant

    1s

    undergoing a planned two week turnaround.

    old salt charge

    1s

    being replaced

    and d d t ~ o n l

    corros10n spool p1eces are be1ng

    1nstalled Wor

    test1ng

    at

    actual salt flow cond1t10ns.

    base case des1gn and durab11ity run will i

    commence

    1n

    early

    June.

    i

    DEVELOPMENT PLAN I

    In

    parallel

    with pilot plant operation,

    separate laboratory and bench-scale f

    exper1mentation

    will

    address salt losses,

    k1net1cs, a1r pur1f1cat10n, alternative salts,

    and better mater1als of construction.

    Pro

    ess

    heat

    1ntegration

    and optimization

    will

    be

    addressed by further engineer1ng stud1es a ter

    the Proof of Concept p110t plant operat1jn.

    Results from these laboratory and eng1neer ng

    studies

    will

    be

    1ncorporated into future p ot

    plant

    operation plans.

    The

    p110t plant ha been

    designed for easy modif1cat10n, so that th se

    future process improvements can

    be

    tested

    nd

    confirmed.

    Support

    by

    the

    DOE

    for the MOLTOX proc ss

    development w111 end

    after

    complet10n

    of the

    1n1tial

    twelve month p110t

    plant

    operation.

    The next phase of development

    111

    requ1re construct10n

    and

    operat10n of a no 1nal

    50 ton per

    day

    semi-works plant, as well a

    continued p110t plant and laboratory work. Air

    Products

    will

    seek development support fro

    partners who are e1ther oxygen users or

    suppliers

    of oxygen us1ng technology and w 0

    can

    also prov1de high temperature metallurg1ca

    expert1se. The areas of technical uncerta nty

    to be addressed by the semi-works plant ar

    plant scaleup and process heat 1ntegrat10n at

    an

    oxygen

    us1ng host

    site.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors

    would 11ke

    to thank Air Pr ducts

    and Chem1cals, Inc. and the U.S. Departmen of

    Energy for perm1ss10n to pub11sh th1s pape

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    5/6

    0783

    SALT

    __ SEPARATOR

    ('200'

    20

    PSIAI

    I I I

    07 02 I

    DESQRBER

    T

    07 80 I

    r - ...L -

    FLUIDIZED

    SALT

    1215F

    SAND

    HEATER

    I

    EPARATOR

    i

    I

    11111111

    I

    11111111

    11111111

    I

    I

    I

    I

    t

    I

    tTl

    i

    0540

    SALT SALT

    EXCHANGER

    10.30

    05 41

    SALT PUMP

    SALT

    COOLER

    05.09

    AlA 0

    1

    EXCHANGER

    AlA

    05 10

    AIRIN

    EXCHANGER

    FIGURE 4

    MOL TOX M PILOT PLANT FLOW DIAGRAM

    c.w

    LEGEND

    CARBON STEEL

    316SS

    OR

    304SS

    INCOLOY 800H

    INCONEL 600

    to O

    ~ ~

    ?

    ....

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986

  • 8/11/2019 Sulfuric acid double contact

    6/6

    EXPERIMENTAL

    PLAN

    REFERENCES

    M O L T O X ~ PILOT PLANT

    1. Er1ckson. D. C.

    S e p a r a ~ l g Q

    of

    Oxygen

    rom

    OVERALL

    Gaseous H1xtures W1th

    Mo,t@n Alka11

    Met

    1

    SCHEDULE

    OBJECTIVES

    S,alj:,s" U.S. Patent 4.132.766; 2 Janu

    ry

    12 STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL ENERGY PROJECT K A N A G E H E N t 9 7 , ~ l t f ~ l f 6

    4.2B7.170;

    ~ g 6 0 . 5 7 8 )

    A.

    ~ ~ ~ r a t i o n

    Anderlon. SC

    .. ..

    2 h . ~ r t ~ ~ n . , D . . .

    'Oxygen Product1on by

    he

    A C O U R A 1 J h ~ r f . ~ ~ ~ A R

    RESPONSE R ~ f ' t l t t - ' p r 8 e J ~ ~ . F1nal 6 ~ l t o r t

    H.

    ~ d ~ g e

    Grant

    Company,

    Bixlon,

    T N ' O O ~ / C S / 4 0 2 8 7 ~ T 2 ' ( O t 8 j 0 1 2 8 4 7 ) ;

    February

    1983.

    Steady state of operat1on

    FUEL C L L ~ 1 t h

    1100F

    desorber.

    Close

    3. Archer.

    R.

    A.

    and Dunbobb1n. B. R "Pllot

    --mater1aland

    energy balance

    Plant Development of A

    Chem1cal

    A1r

    Seuion

    cwtftaat'gefl.

    I i t ~ ..

    Konlanto

    C O l I p a n Y 6 ~ c Y

    Process." F1nal Task I DOE

    Report

    DE-AC07-82CE40544; May

    1985.

    4

    Months

    FUEl. c ~ b S e N 8

    A t S l _ ~ m C H N O L O G Y , Douglas M. Jewel,

    M o r g H w k l i i t l l l M l r o ~ c J R c 1 ;

    Center,

    M o r g ~ t e r J t R J t l < J 6 f ) h l ,

    '8'.' 'R' 'B"r"o\on, ~ ? 7 R .

    pur1tles.

    and

    energy Cassano.

    A.

    A

    .

    and

    Massey.

    R.

    G

    .

    THE O N g ~ ' I U ' t I l . o o E f D r c e u R l a n O SYSTEM, Root

    _ _

    < t m n J J S ~ t e m Integrat10n for The i

    John(,nOeMtlluo.iI.rtaren A.

    Trimble,

    Gas R e ~ r f l l t 8 l ~ t ' f l ' f e O x y g e n aniHeam." AICh

    Chicago,

    IL

    . . . . . . . . . . o y I l 1 P 0 5 . , u 5 e f . , ~ lIugust 1985.

    5 ~ 8 t t l e ,

    Durab1l1ty run. Long term

    P O T E N ~ A t s r t o i

    ,oiLeOltU. IN. REFINERIES A N D 5 C H 5 Q i ~ ~ L ~ . W

    T1tcomb. J. B

    .

    PLANt8}acrili;Allllt".naddtlred

    Roach,

    Los A ~ ' f l f 1 n g e r .

    H.

    T

    . and D ~ n P o b b 1 n .

    B

    ,

    National Laboratory, LOl Alamos,

    NK

    ~ r r e s 4 e f t 4 f t H o ~ t e n N 1 t r a 1 ~ ~ N 1 t r 1 t eSalts"

    B

    Opt1m1zat1on _ Journal of Metals - July 1985.

    r

    PLANNING ACOMMERCIAL FUEL CELL

    INSTALLATION, Ji

    ie R.

    J l o w ~ M . ~ c Q e f l 1 g ' 9 4 Y I i 8 h t e l N a t 1 o n ~ 1 Inc.,

    San

    F r a ~ ' l w ~ t t : w l . r . i 1 t ~ .

    glJt1

    ty

    .aod..

    633

    energy use for

    Base Case B

    E N C O U w . b i R ; I i ~ t . L ) DEMONSTRATIONS

    OF

    FUEL CELL

    APPLICATIONS,

    JOleph

    M.

    Anderlon,

    I n d u ~ t r i a l

    Fuel Cell Association,

    Lake

    2

    Months

    643

    1

    t h a i l ~ 1 , e ' t f A , 1 . R J R r , q V . ~ < t . Q R ~ r . < i t t n

    at more severe operat1ng

    cond1t1ons (1250F

    C O M B U S T l o W ~ C Y HEAT

    RECOVERY

    ho. .

    &.raRleJ:f,w.l

    Sess\on

    ~ l ~ r ~ ~ o s l ~ ~ n

    A. Mozzo, Jr . Aaerican ~ t a n d a r d ,

    Inc.,

    pallcU'Tar * e ~ \ i h

    NY

    concentrat1on '

    COGENERATION

    AT IOWA METHODIST MEDICAL

    CENTER.

    Cabot

    Thunem,

    and Steve

    Schebler,

    Stanley ConsultanU, Inc., Muscatine,

    IA

    and Glenn Love,

    Iowa

    Methodist Medical Center,

    Des

    Moinel, IA

    677

    I N D U s t i p ~ e c O b E N E R A T I O N

    APPLICATION, Martin

    A. Mozzo, Jr .

    American Standard.

    Inc.,

    New York.

    NY .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 684

    x v ~ P l

    ESL-IE-86-06-78

    Proceedings from the Eighth Annual Industrial Energy Technology Conference, Houston, TX, June 17-19, 1986