Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
i
Study of precipitation in martensitic Fe-C-Cr alloys
during tempering: Experiments and modelling
Ziyong Hou
Licentiate Thesis
Stockholm 2015
Unit of Structures
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
School of Industrial Engineering and Management
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 Stockholm
Sweden
Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan i Stockholm,
framlägges för offentlig granskning för avläggande av Teknologie Licentiatexamen,
fredagen den 4 december, kl. 13.00 i Kuben (N111), Brinellvägen 23, Materialvetenskap,
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm
ISBN 978-91-7595-756-2
ii
Ziyong Hou Study of precipitation in martensitic Fe-C-Cr alloys during tempering:
Experiments and modelling
Unit of Structures
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
School of Industrial Engineering and Management
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 Stockholm
Sweden
ISBN 978-91-7595-756-2
© Ziyong Hou (侯自勇), September, 2015
iii
献给我的家人
To my beloved family
iv
v
Abstract
Understanding the precipitation reaction is very important since precipitation hardening is
one of the most effective strengthening mechanisms in metallic alloys. In martensitic
steels, a tempering heat treatment is often performed. During tempering various new
phases are precipitated and the spatial and temporal evolution of these precipitates
strongly influences the properties of the steel, such as strength/ductility, creep, fatigue
and hot corrosion resistance. Therefore, the possibility of quantitative modelling of the
precipitation process will provide many opportunities for advanced materials and process
design and optimization as well as service life assessments. The Fe-C-Cr system forms
the basis for tool steels and is consequently used in many applications such as e.g. metal
forming operations. They are characterized by a high hardness and good toughness, even
at elevated temperatures.
In the present work, the as-quenched martensitic microstructures of four Fe-C-Cr alloys
with varying Cr and C contents were characterized by Light Optical Microscopy (LOM)
and Electron Microscopy. The effects of Cr and C on the morphology of martensite were
investigated. It was found that Cr addition had a similar effect as C on the martensitic
morphology and on the ratio of high-angle grain boundary (HAGB) to low-angle grain
boundary (LAGB). However, the micro-hardness was unaffected by the Cr addition
whilst it was strongly influenced by the C addition.
In addition, a quantitative experimental characterization of the precipitates formed during
tempering of the martensite was performed. The Langer-Schwartz theory combined with
the Kampmann-Wagner-Numerical (KWN) method, as implemented in the software TC-
PRISMA, was used to predict the precipitation of carbides after tempering in one of the
model alloys: Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr (mass%). The microstructure characterization of the as-
quenched material provided vital input parameters for the modelling work and a
comparison was made between the modelling predictions and the experimental results.
The effect of parameters such as dislocation density, grain size and interfacial energy on
the precipitation of carbides was discussed.
vi
Keywords Fe-C-Cr alloy; Microstructure; Precipitates; Tempering of martensite;
Electron microscopy; Modelling.
vii
Sammanfattning
En god förståelse för utskiljningsreaktioner är mycket viktigt eftersom
utskiljningshärdning är en av de mest effektiva härdningsmekanismerna i metallegeringar.
För martensitiska stål utförs ofta en värmebehandling kallad anlöpning. Under
anlöpningen skiljs nya faser ut och storleken och den rumsliga fördelningen av dessa
utskiljningar påverkar starkt stålets egenskaper, såsom hållfasthet, seghet, krypmotstånd,
utmattning och varmkorrosions-beständighet. Kvantitativ modellering av
utskiljningsreaktioner skulle möjliggöra avancerad design av material och processer samt
livslängdbedömningar.
Fe-C-Cr-systemet utgör grunden för verktygsstål och används i många tillämpningar
såsom t.ex. metallformningsoperationer. De kännetecknas av en hög hårdhet och god
seghet, även vid förhöjda temperaturer. I detta arbete har den martensitiska
mikrostrukturen efter snabbkylning för fyra Fe-C-Cr-legeringar med varierande Cr-och
C-halt undersökts med ljusoptisk mikroskopi (LOM) och elektronmikroskopi. Effekterna
av Cr och C på morfologin hos martensit har studerats. Tillsatsen av Cr hade en liknande
effekt som C på martensitens morfologi och på förhållandet mellan hög-
vinkelkorngränser (HAGB) till låg-vinkelkorngränser (LAGB). Däremot var mikro-
hårdheten opåverkad av Cr tillsats medan den tydligt påverkades av C-tillsats.
Dessutom har en kvantitativ experimentell karakterisering av de karbider som utskiljs
under anlöpning av den martensitiska strukturen i Fe-0.15C-4.0 Cr (mass-%) genomförts.
Modellering av karbidutskiljningen denna legering gjordes med programvaran TC-
PRISMA, som bygger på teorin av Langer-Schwartz kombinerat med den numeriska
metoden utvecklad av Kampmann-Wagner, och simuleringarna jämfördes med de
experimentella resultaten. Den tidigare karakteriseringen av den martensitiska
mikrostrukturen utgjorde en viktig del för modelleringsarbetet. Speciellt studerades
effekten av parametrar såsom dislokationstäthet, kornstorlek och ytenergi på
simuleringsresultaten.
viii
Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to give my thanks to my main supervisor, Joakim Odqvist and
co- supervisor, Peter Hedström. Both of them have given me so much help during the
past two years. Your kind help and great interest in my work is sincerely appreciated.
I would like to thank Dr. Qing Chen at Thermo-Calc Software AB for his helpful
guidance to the TC-PRISMA software and for valuable discussions. Fredrik Lindberg
and Niklas Pettersson at Swerea KIMAB are thanked for their guidance to the preparation
of carbon replica samples and for help with the TEM. A special thanks goes to Henrik
Jesperson (formerly with Uddeholms AB) and Maria Kvarnström at Uddeholms AB for
their support with some of the TEM work.
I would like to acknowledge my colleagues in the Department of Materials Science and
Engineering at KTH for providing a rigorous scientific research atmosphere. Especially, I
would give to my thanks to all of whom gave me support and help: please forgive me
since I cannot write down all of your names. Thanks to your company my life in Sweden
has been far from dull and boring and I will never forget any of you.
This work was performed within the VINN Excellence Center Hero-m, financed by
VINNOVA, the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems, Swedish
industry and KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Support from The China Scholarship
Council (CSC), travel grants from Olle Erikssons Stiftelse för materialteknik and a
research grant from the Swedish Steel Producers’ Association are gratefully
acknowledged.
Finally, I would like to express my greatest gratitude to my parents and my wife for their
endless support.
ix
Supplements
The present thesis is based on the following supplements:
Supplement 1
Microstructure of Martensite in Fe-C-Cr and its Implications for Modelling of Carbide
Precipitation during Tempering
Ziyong Hou, Peter Hedström, Yunbo Xu, Di Wu and Joakim Odqvist
ISIJ International, 2014, 51(11): 2649-2656.
Supplement 2
Quantitative Modelling and Experimental Verification of Carbide Precipitation During
Tempering of Martensite in an Fe-0.16 wt.%C- 4.0 wt.%Cr Alloy
Ziyong Hou, Peter Hedström, Qing Chen, Yunbo Xu, Di Wu and Joakim Odqvist
Submitted to Calphad.
The contributions by the author to the supplements of this thesis:
Supplement 1
Literature survey, sample preparation, experimental characterization, simulations, and
writing of the first draft.
Supplement 2
Literature survey, sample preparation, experimental characterization, simulations, and
writing of the first draft.
x
Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Objectives of the work .............................................................................................. 2
Chapter 2 Martensitic steels ................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Martensitic microstructure in steels .......................................................................... 3
2.2 Tempering of martensite ........................................................................................... 4
2.3 Precipitation hardening in martensitic steel .............................................................. 6
Chapter 3 Experimental methodology ................................................................................ 8
3.1 Materials ................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Heat treatment ......................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Austenitization and quenching ......................................................................... 10
3.2.2 Tempering ........................................................................................................ 10
3.3 Microstructure observations.................................................................................... 12
3.3.1 Light optical microscopy (LOM) ..................................................................... 12
3.3.2 Transmission electron microscope (TEM)....................................................... 12
3.3.3 Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) ......................................................... 12
3.4 Quantification of precipitates .................................................................................. 13
3.4.1 Carbon extraction replica ................................................................................. 13
3.4.2 Identification of precipitates ............................................................................ 14
3.4.3 Mean radii of precipitates ................................................................................ 14
3.4.4 Volume fraction of precipitates ....................................................................... 15
Chapter 4 Modelling of the precipitation .......................................................................... 17
4.1 General information of the modelling..................................................................... 17
4.2 Parameters for simulation ....................................................................................... 17
xi
Chapter 5 Summary of key results .................................................................................... 19
5.1 Martensitic microstructure before tempering.......................................................... 19
5.2 Precipitation in martensite during tempering .......................................................... 21
5.3 Comparison between modelling and experimental results ..................................... 22
Chapter 6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 26
Chapter 7 Future Work ..................................................................................................... 27
References ......................................................................................................................... 29
1
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background
Martensitic steels show an ultra-high strength and are widely used in applications such as
e.g. metal forming operations and engineering machinery after their toughness have been
improved by optimized heat treatments, such as tempering [1-3]. The tempering step is
accompanied by precipitation of carbides which may result in increased strength and
ductility if the dispersive particles are coherent with the matrix [4-11]. In the alternative
scenario, several factors including migration of carbon atoms from the matrix phase,
decomposition of retained austenite, precipitation and coarsening of the precipitates,
recovery of dislocation structures and recrystallization, may lead to softening of the
matrix phase [12-16]. Understanding of the precipitation reaction by advanced
experimental and computational methodology is thus required for advanced material
design and optimized heat treatments [2, 4, 17-21].
In the past decades, substantial research has been performed on characterizing the
precipitation during tempering of steels [4, 6, 10, 11, 17, 21, 23-27] using various
experimental methodologies such as e.g. the three-dimensional atom probe (3DAP) [28-
29]. Both identification and quantification of the precipitates have been conducted, and
several types of particles, such as MC, M2C, M3C, M7C3, M23C6 and M6C may precipitate
in iron based alloys [4, 10, 21-27]. The spatial and temporal evolution of these
precipitates is determined by: the initial microstructure, influencing the interface type and
nucleation sites, as well as the composition and tempering parameters, influencing the
conditions at the phase interface in diffusional phase transformations [6, 11, 21, 23, 25-
27]. Therefore, these factors are needed for an analysis of the precipitation in steels
during tempering.
In addition to the experimental approach, several commercial software packages, for
instance: PrecipiCalc, MatCalc, PanPrecipitation, MICRESS and DICTRA, have been
used to simulate the precipitation process in different materials [30-39]. These software
2
packages have in many cases become important tools for material scientists in their daily
research work. Recently, the software TC-PRISMA has been developed to simulate the
co-precipitation of phases with concurrent processes of nucleation, growth and
coarsening [40-43]. In many of the previous studies on precipitation during tempering of
martensite the focus was on the qualitative or semi-quantitative evolution of the particle
size distributions (PSD) over time but few studies have been performed on a quantitative
basis. Thus, it is still a challenge to quantitatively model the precipitation in martensitic
steels during tempering.
1.2 Objectives of the work
The aims of the present work are to quantitatively characterize and model the
precipitation during tempering of a martensitic Fe-C-Cr steel. Specifically, the effect of
the initial microstructure on the precipitation will be evaluated to increase the
understanding of microstructure parameters such as dislocation density, grain size, etc. on
the precipitation. Furthermore, the comparison between experimental data and
simulations will provide a basis for further refinement of the modelling.
3
Chapter 2 Martensitic steels
2.1 Martensitic microstructure in steels
Martensite in steels may be regarded as a supersaturated solid solution of carbon atoms in
the body-centered cubic (BCC) ferrite (α-Fe) phase or body-centered tetragonal (BCT)
crystal structure [1, 12, 23, 44]. It is generated in a displacive and diffusionless
transformation from austenite in case the cooling rate is above the critical cooling rate,
sufficient to avoid all diffusional solid-state transformations such as the ferritic or
pearlitic transformation [1, 44-46].
Martensite can have various morphologies, e.g. lath, butterfly, lenticular and thin plate,
depending on several factors including chemical composition, transformation temperature,
degree of supercooling, stacking fault energy and strength of austenite and martensite etc.
[42, 44, 47-60]. In Fig.1, typical martensitic morphologies of Fe-C-Cr alloys are
presented. The features of martensite such as mean size of lath/packet/block, austenite
grain size and dislocation density etc. provide the initial information on e.g. nucleation
sites for precipitation. Therefore, characterization of the initial microstructure is vital for
understanding of the precipitation in martensite during tempering [5, 14, 42].
Fig.1 Typical martensite morphologies of Fe-C-Cr alloys (a) Fe-0.15C -1Cr (mass%),
lath-shaped martensite, (b) Fe-1C-4Cr (mass%), plate-shaped martensite.
4
2.2 Tempering of martensite
The mechanical property of martensitic steels is usually modified with a heat treatment
called tempering [1-3, 6, 15]. As a result, the toughness is improved due to the strain-
stress release in martensite during tempering, and in certain cases the hardness can be
increased by precipitation hardening. A good combination of toughness and strength is
then achieved. In order to gain a good integrated performance extensive studies have
been carried out on the tempering behavior of martensitic steels [7-9, 11, 21-26].
Tempering of martensitic steels is usually performed in the range between 150 and 700
oC [1]. The chemical composition and the required mechanical property for a certain
alloy determine the selection of tempering temperature and time. The precipitates will
nucleate at preferred nucleation sites, and the dislocation density decreases significantly
during tempering. Meanwhile, the matrix phase changes during prolonged tempering, e.g.
the martensite gradually transform from BCT structure to BCC structure due to that the
carbon atoms leave the matrix to form carbide precipitates [12, 18, 23]. In Fig.2, SEM
images of a tempered martensitic Fe-C-Cr alloy are presented. It is clearly seen that, after
tempering at 700 oC for 1000 h the final microstructure consists of coarse particles in the
ferritic matrix phase, while much finer particles and lath-shaped martensitic/ferritic
structures are found at 500 oC.
Fig.2 Microstructures of martensitic Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy after tempering at
500 oC(a) and 700
oC (b) for 1000 h.
5
The precipitation reaction in martensitic steels during tempering has three stages, i.e.
nucleation, growth and coarsening. The first step of precipitation is the nucleation where
spatial fluctuations of phase structure and concentration develop within a supersaturated
metastable alloy [9-10, 61]. From a modelling side, when a spherical embryo with a
radius ir is created by thermal fluctuation, the change of Gibbs free energy can be
described by the following terms:
3 2 34 4( ) 4 ( ) ( )
3 3
i i i
v stG r G r r G (Eq.2.1)
where vG is the chemical free energy change per unit volume, is the specific
interfacial energy and stG is the strain energy due to misfit between the nuclei and
matrix. During growth of the nucleated precipitate the solubility of the alloying elements
in the matrix will decrease towards the equilibrium composition. Later, as the equilibrium
fraction of the second phases has precipitated, the coarsening of precipitates occurs, in
which large particles grow and smaller particles dissolve [9, 10, 38, 40, 61]. Fig.3 shows
TEM images of a Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy after tempering at 700 oC for 0.5 h. It is clearly
seen that the precipitates with different morphology form at lath boundaries as well as
inside laths.
Fig.3 Precipitates on lath and dislocations (a) and on boundary (b) of a martensitic
Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy tempering at 700 oC for 0.5 h.
6
2.3 Precipitation hardening in martensitic steel
Precipitation hardening can be a potent strengthening mechanism in case the precipitation
hardening overrides the softening of the martensite phase [4, 6, 9, 21]. This strengthening
effect relies on the interaction between the dislocations and precipitates. In principle, two
models have been used to describe the dislocation passage through a precipitate: cut
through and Orowan looping, as seen in Fig.4 [8].
Fig.4 Interaction mechanism of precipitates and dislocations: (a) Cutting through
precipitates; (b) Orowan looping, from Ref. [8].
Volume fraction, size (these two variables define the mean particle space in specific
volume) and shape of particles etc. are vital parameters when considering the
contribution of the precipitates to strengthening. The shear stress contributed, P , by the
precipitates can be expressed by [9]:
Region
of slip
Precipitate
particle
Force tb per unit length
7
P
Gb
L
(Eq.2.2)
where L is the mean space between the precipitates, G is the shear modulus of the iron
matrix, b is Burger’s vector, is a dimensionless constant characterizing the obstacle
mechanisms. The smaller the space L, the higher is the yield stress P . This implies that
quantitative characterization of the precipitates is needed to optimize the strength of
materials.
Besides the impact on strength, the precipitates have many indirect effects. The
precipitation of different intermetallic phases has been extensively studied in relation to
material performance changes [62-67]. For instance, nanometer sized precipitates always
plays a crucial role for the microstructure stability and resistance to creep and to
hydrogen damage, even at elevated temperatures [65-67]. Thus, the ability to control the
formation of precipitates, particularly in terms of size, distribution and fraction, provides
a powerful tool in the optimization of the end properties of materials. Not only in the case
of tempered martensite.
8
Chapter 3 Experimental methodology
In the present chapter the experimental methodologies, used for microstructure
characterization and phase identification of precipitates in martensitic Fe-C-Cr steels, are
presented. In Fig. 5, a schematic overview of the experimental procedures is presented.
Fig.5 Schematic of the experimental procedures in the thesis.
LOM
General
martensitic
microstructure
Fe-C-Cr steels
Heat treatment
Austenitization+quenching
Tempering
TEM:
Carbon replica
Identify and
quantify the
precipitates
TEM:
Thin foil
Fine
microstructure:
dislocations,
laths, plates etc.
EBSD
Grain
boundary
distribution
9
3.1 Materials
Fe-C-Cr can be regarded as a basic system for tool steels. Four Fe-C-Cr steels with
varying C and Cr content were selected as model alloys. In Table.1, the chemical
compositions of the alloys used in the present work are listed. The phase diagrams of Fe-
C-Cr alloys with fixed C and varying Cr from 0 to 5.0 mass% are shown in Fig.6,
calculated by the Thermo-Calc software using the TCFE7 database [68, 69].
Table.1 Chemical compositions of the investigated alloys (in mass%)
No. C Cr Si Mn S Al Cu Ni
A 0.14 0.98 0.021 0.07 0.06 0.01 0.011 0.017
B 0.16 4.05 0.028 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.009 0.015
C 0.95 1.06 0.019 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.011 0.017
D 0.88 4.12 0.028 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.005 0.012
Fig.6 Phase diagram of Fe- C - Cr alloys with 0.15C (a) and 1.0C (mass%) (b),
here, γ represents austenite; α represents ferrite, θ represents cementite.
α+ θ +MC α +M23C6
α +M7C3
γ
α+ θ +M7C3 α+ θ
γ
(a) (b)
10
3.2 Heat treatment
3.2.1 Austenitization and quenching
To achieve a martensitic microstructure, quenching from the austenitization temperature
was performed. Small samples with dimensions 10×10×1 mm3, enabling a sufficiently
high cooling rate in the whole sample, were cut from the hot-rolled plate, and austenitized
at a temperature where the initial microstructure completely transform into austenite.
According to the phase diagram shown in Fig.6, all the samples are fully austenitic at
1100oC, and the austenitization was thus performed at that temperature for 10 min.
Prior to the heat treatments, calibration of the temperature for the Entech tube furnace
was performed. The Entech tube furnace has a small isothermal heating zone of about 2
to 3 cm close to the center of the furnace. The samples were spot welded on the tip of a
stainless steel rod and placed in the center of the furnace for austenitization in an Ar
atmosphere. Subsequently, these austenitized samples were quenched in brine to room
temperature [42].
3.2.2 Tempering
Tempering is usually applied after quenching to achieve the proper toughness, final
hardness and dimensional stability [1]. Precipitation and spheroidization of the carbides
accompanied by the recovery and recrystallization of matrix phase will occur in the
martensite during tempering and it relates to the final properties of the material. Hence,
the final properties of the steel can be controlled to some extent by controlling the
tempering temperature and time. In order to understand the development of precipitation
in martensitic Fe-C-Cr alloys during tempering, the as-quenched samples were tempered
at 700 oC for times ranging from 5 s to 1000 h.
In the present study, three different methodologies were employed to try and eliminate
the influence of heating time, oxidation and decarburization during the tempering. The
details of the heat treatments are listed in Table.2.
11
Table.2 Experimental conditions and equipment used in the present study
Tempering time 5 s, 5min 30 min 5 h, 100 h, 1000 h
Methods Sn-Bi metal
bath
Tube furnace in Ar
atmosphere
Vacuum-sealed quartz
tube in Muffle furnace
Calibration of the temperature for the metal bath furnace and the Muffle furnace was
performed prior to the tempering treatments. In Fig.7, a schematic illustration of the
heating zone with dimensions 100×100 mm2 in the Muffle furnace is shown.
Fig.7 Schematic drawing of the Muffle furnace.
An example of a vacuum encapsulated sample in a quartz tube, aimed at long-term
tempering (5 h, 100 h and 1000 h), is shown in Fig.8. A high-voltage spark tester was
used to measure the vacuum before and after the heat treatments.
Fig.8 Vacuum-sealed sample prepared for long-term tempering.
Heating zone
Resistive heater Thermocouple
Furnace shell
Tube samples
12
3.3 Microstructure observations
3.3.1 Light optical microscopy (LOM)
To avoid heating of the quenched martensitic microstructure during hot mounting all as-
quenched samples were cold mounted. The tempered samples were hot mounted before
grinding and polishing. All the mounted samples were ground using 100# to 1500
# SiC
abrasive papers and polished using a 0.05 μm Al2O3 suspension. Then, these samples
were etched by either 2% or 4% (vol.%) Nital, depending on the etching resistance of the
alloys. The prepared samples were examined using a LEICA DMRM microscope.
3.3.2 Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
Electron microscopes, including transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning
electron microscope (SEM), have a significantly higher resolution than LOM and are
generally used to characterize the fine-scale microstructure in many materials. In steels,
TEM is capable of imaging dislocations and twins, identifying crystallographic
orientation relationships between adjacent grains, and identifying the crystal structures
and lattice parameters of interesting phases, etc. Thin foil TEM samples are frequently
used for TEM examinations [42, 43, 70]. Each sample was mechanically ground on SiC
abrasive papers to 40 ~ 50 μm thickness and then small discs with diameters of 3 mm
were punched out. These discs were subsequently electropolished using a Struers
Tenupol-5 twin-jet electropolishing device. For the low carbon alloys (alloy A and alloy
B), the prepared discs were electropolished using an electrolyte consisting of 9%
perchloric acid and 91% ethanol (vol.-%) at a voltage of 20~30 V and -15 ~ -25oC. For
the high carbon alloys (alloy C and alloy D), the electrolyte was 5% perchloric acid, 15%
glycerol, and 80% methanol (vol.-%), and the corresponding parameters were 20 ~ 30 V
and 10 ~ 20 oC. The TEM experiments were performed on a JEOL JEM-2100F TEM
operating at 200 kV.
3.3.3 Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
A careful sample preparation process is required for successful EBSD analysis. Since
artifacts can appear at each step of preparation, utmost care is necessary at all levels.
13
Special mechanical polishing was employed for the preparation of EBSD samples. A
small load (15 N) was applied on the samples during grinding and polishing, aiming at
reducing the imposed surface deformation. Finally, a 7 min polishing by 0.05 μm Al2O3
suspensions was performed, followed by a 30 s water-polishing. The prepared samples
were investigated using a SEM LEO 1530 equipped with an EBSD detector. An
acceleration voltage and step size of 20 kV and 0.2 μm, respectively, were used for the
EBSD measurement in the present study.
3.4 Quantification of precipitates
3.4.1 Carbon extraction replica
In the past studies, characterization of precipitates in steels has been mainly carried out
using TEM on thin foils and carbon extraction replicas. In comparison with the thin foil
TEM samples, the carbon extraction replicas have several potential advantages: (1)
distinct contrast between the precipitates and the matrix make semi-automatic (even
automatic) measurement of the size distribution possible; (2) elimination of the influence
of the matrix phase during chemical composition analysis; (3) large available area for
TEM examination and statistical analysis; (4) avoiding a magnetic specimen that interacts
with the electron beam. Thus, the carbon extraction replicas were prepared for
quantitative analysis of the precipitates [43, 71].
A schematic of the carbon extraction replica sample preparation is shown in Fig.9. Firstly,
the sample was carefully ground and polished as for metallographic samples. After that,
the polished sample was chemically etched with a suitable etchant, in this case, 2 vol. %
Nital for Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr steel after tempering at 700oC. Thereafter, a carbon coating of
15 to 25 nm was deposited onto the etched surface using a Gatan 682 PECS™ (Precision
Etching and Coating System, see in Fig.10). Then, the deposited carbon film was divided
into several small squares (2×2 mm2) by a sharp blade, and floated off in a solution of 10
vol.% perchlorate alcohol. A blend of distilled water and ethanol was applied to unfold
the small carbon films after rinsing them in ethanol. Finally, several pieces of replicas
were collected onto a copper grid and dried in ambient air.
14
Fig.9 Schematic of carbon replica sample preparation.
Fig.10 Gatan 682 PECS™ for carbon coating.
3.4.2 Identification of precipitates
Selected area diffraction (SAD) patterns of the precipitate, in combination with its
chemical composition analyzed by Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXs), were
used to identify the precipitates [72, 73]. Several similarly shaped particles were selected
for each type of precipitate to ensure that the identification was correct. It was assumed
that, one type of precipitate has a similar shape in a specific steel alloy. It was found that
the faceted ones are M7C3 while elongated ones are M23C6 [42].
3.4.3 Mean radii of precipitates
After the identification of the precipitates the PSD analysis was also performed using
multiple TEM bright field images taken from the carbon replicas. Automatic particle
analysis was processed using the software ImageJ, and a considerable number of the
precipitates were counted for each type of precipitate. First of all, an image threshold was
Mechanical polishing Etching Carbon deposition Divided +Extraction
15
applied to the TEM image and then a binary image was created with black precipitates
and white background. Thereafter, the area of each selected particle can be exported.
Then, the data was categorized, representing each type of precipitates, based on the
aspect ratio (see in Fig.11).
Fig.11 Different types of precipitates shown in different aspect ratio
The areas of the particles were converted to radii (assuming a spherical shape). The mean
radius mr of the precipitate j can be expressed by the total area Aj and number of particles
counted (n):
1
1 n
m j jr An
(Eq. 3.1)
Based on the number of particles in each class the PSD of each type of precipitate can be
obtained.
3.4.4 Volume fraction of precipitates
In addition to the mean radius, the volume fraction is also a key factor in precipitation
because both of them will determine the effect of the precipitates on the properties of the
material, as mentioned earlier. Thus, quantitative analysis of the fraction of precipitates
needs to be conducted. Chemical extraction is a relatively simple but effective method to
separate the particles from the matrix. In the present case, 10 vol. % perchlorate ethanol
was employed, and 100~210 mg of the sample was dissolved for each case in a glass
L
W
16
beaker. After filtering of the solution using a 15 nm pore size membrane filter, the
residue was washed several times using methanol before drying it. Finally, the precipitate
was weighed on a high precision digital electronic analytical balance scale (accuracy 0.01
mg). The mass fraction of each type of precipitate was determined, and subsequently, the
volume fraction was calculated by considering the density of precipitate and matrix phase.
17
Chapter 4 Modelling of the precipitation
4.1 General information of the modelling
Many attempts have been made to modelling the precipitation in steels [10, 20, 22]. The
Kampmann-Wagner numerical (KWN) model as implemented in the TC-PRISMA
software can be used to predict precipitation reactions in multi-component and
multiphase materials. The PSD, mean radii and number density of the precipitates during
the whole tempering sequence can be calculated by solving a set of equations derived
from certain assumptions for the nucleation and growth rates [40-42].
In the TC-PRISMA software, the nucleation, growth and coarsening of the precipitates
are treated as concomitant processes. And, three growth models, i.e. simplified, advanced
and binary dilute solution model, were implemented. For instance, the simplified growth
model takes the operating tie-line across the bulk composition and avoids the computing
of the tie-line iteratively from flux-balance equations during the tempering. Moreover,
the growth model used in the present study, proposed by Chen, Jeppsson and Ågren (CJA)
[39], takes both cross-diffusion terms and high supersaturations into account at the same
time. Details about the model for nucleation, growth and coarsening used in the software
can be found in Refs. [30, 39-41, 74].
4.2 Parameters for simulation
The thermodynamic and kinetic data needed for the simulation work are taken from the
TCFE7 and MOBFE2 databases. Since input parameters, such as interfacial energy and
dislocation density, have a strong influence on the simulation results, these parameters
deserve special attention. When setting up a simulation a few candidate carbides are
chosen, and the formed carbides during tempering are determined by TC-PRISMA. In a
Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy, the stable and metastable carbides at 700oC are M7C3 and M23C6
respectively. This is in accordance with experimental results [42]. The interfacial energy,
σ, depending on whether the particle is coherent, semi-coherent or incoherent with the
matrix phase, is a key parameter in the precipitation modelling due to its cubic relation
18
with the nucleation and growth rates [39-42]. It can be estimated using an extension to
Becker’s model implemented in TC-PRISMA. Here, the 𝜎 of M23C6/BCC is calculated
and kept as 0.272 Jm-2
, and that of M7C3/BCC is varied in a small range from 0.412 to
0.422 Jm-2
. Furthermore, the high density of dislocations are assumed to be the primary
heterogeneous nucleation sites in the martensitic matrix during tempering. The
dislocation density was varied in the range between 1.0×1014
and 1.8×1015
m-2
,
depending on the microstructure and compositions [48]. The supersaturated martensite is
treated as a BCC structure.
19
Chapter 5 Summary of key results
This chapter gives a summary of the key results in the present work, following the order:
martensitic microstructure before tempering → precipitation in martensite during
tempering → comparison between the experiments and the modelling results.
5.1 Martensitic microstructure before tempering
Since the initial microstructure, such as dislocation density, grain size, etc. is related to
the subsequent precipitation of carbides during tempering, the quenched martensitic
microstructures are presented. In Fig. 12, the inverse pole figures (IPF) from EBSD
analysis of four Fe-C-Cr alloys are presented. A “classical” lath-like martensite as well
as a prior austenite grain including several martensitic packets and blocks is clearly
shown for 0.15%C alloys. With an increase in Cr from 1.0 to 4.0%, the lath units become
much finer. On the other hand, a mixed microstructure of plate-like martensite and small
portions of lath-like martensite are obtained in the Fe-1.0Cr-1.0C alloy. As the Cr content
increases from 1.0 to 4.0 mass%, the aspect ratio of plate-like martensite increases. In
addition, parts of the parallel units, resembling the packet structure of martensite in the
low-carbon alloys, disappears. Cr plays a similar role to C on the martensitic morphology
in Fe-C-Cr alloys.
20
Fig.12 EBSD images for the four as-quenched Fe-C-Cr alloys, from Ref. [42].
(a) Fe-0.15C -1.0Cr; (b) Fe-0.15C -4.0Cr;
(c) Fe-1.0C -1.0Cr; (d) Fe-1.0C -4.0Cr.
Fig.13 shows the hardness of the present four Fe-C-Cr alloys, and data from the literature
for Fe-C and Fe-C-X alloys were also plotted. The hardness increases with increasing C
content but does not depend on other elements, such as Cr, Ni, significantly in steels.
When the Cr content increases from 1.0 to 4.0% the micro-hardness of low-carbon steels
changes slightly despite the significant changes of the martensitic morphology. The
highest micro-hardness of the four Fe-C-Cr alloys was acquired in alloy C despite its
lower Cr content compared to alloy D. This is ascribed to the slightly higher C content in
alloy C as compared with alloy D. It can be concluded that the micro-hardness of Fe-C-
Cr alloys is mainly dependent on C content while the martensitic morphology is related to
both C and Cr content.
21
Fig.13 Hardness of the investigated alloys in comparison with literature data for Fe-C and
Fe-C-X alloys, from Ref. [42].
5.2 Precipitation in martensite during tempering
Fig.14 shows TEM images of the precipitates in the Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy tempered for
different times at 700oC. It can be seen that, the nucleation of precipitates has occurred
after 5s. With the tempering proceeding, the precipitates grow and two types of
precipitates, i.e. faceted and elongated, can be found after all tempering times. From SAD
it can be concluded that faceted precipitates represent M7C3 and elongated precipitates
correspond to M23C6.
22
Fig.14 TEM micrograph of Fe-0.15C - 4.0Cr alloy tempered at 700oC for
(a) 5 s; (b) 5 min; (c) 5 h; (d) 1000 h.
5.3 Comparison between modelling and experimental results
The counted precipitates of the samples tempered for different times are listed in Table. 3.
More than 263 M7C3 carbides are considered. However, only a few M23C6 carbides have
been found within an identical area as that counted for M7C3.
The mean radii of the precipitates from experimental work and calculated by TC-
PRISMA are shown in Fig.15. The mean radii of both M7C3 and M23C6 are sensitive to
the interfacial energy. It is also known that the mean radii are influenced by grain size,
and dislocation density if assuming them as nucleation sites. In Fig.16, the difference
between the volume fractions of precipitates calculated using TC-PRISMA and from
extraction experiments is presented. From both the modelling and experimental results,
1μm
(d)
0.5μm
(c)
(b)
0.2μm
(a)
100nm
23
the volume fraction of M7C3 stays stable after the nucleation stage is completed, and
metastable M23C6 disappears after long-term tempering.
Table.3 Mean radius and counting number of particles for different tempering times
Tempering time 5 s 5 min 30 min 5 h 100 h 1000 h
Mean radius of M7C3 16 21 26 56 131 134
Mean radius of M23C6 15 24 32 63 94 156
Number of counted M7C3 263 286 288 324 294 337
Number of counted M23C6 16 14 10 8 5 1
Fig.15 Mean radii of M7C3 (a) and M23C6 (b) of the alloy tempered for different times,
obtained from TC-PRISMA (solid lines) and experiments (symbols).
24
Fig.16 Volume fraction evolution of M7C3 (a) and M23C6 (b) during tempering simulated
using TC-PRISMA (solid lines) and from extraction experiments (symbols).
For M7C3, the simplified growth model can capture the evolution of the precipitation
during tempering expect for the early stage, see Figs. 15a and 16a. However, for M23C6,
there is a huge difference between the simulation results and experimental measurements
no matter how the input parameters are varied, see Figs. 15b and 16b.
Based on an analysis using the advanced growth model [43], the growth of M7C3 at the
early stage shows a transition from the non-partitioning local equilibrium (NPLE) to
partitioning local equilibrium (PLE) condition due to the size dependent capillarity effect
[39]. This transition leads to a deviation of the modelling result for M7C3 compared to the
experimental results at the beginning stage of precipitation. For PLE, distribution of
substitutional elements is necessary, thus the transformation is slow; in NPLE condition,
the transformation is controlled by the carbon diffusion and no substantial components
redistribution occurs at the interface, so the transformation is extremely fast compared to
that in PLE condition.
The M23C6 volume fraction is overestimated in the simulations, and a very low fraction of
M23C6 can still be found experimentally after 1000 h of tempering. Several critical factors
should be considered for this difference between the modelling and experiments. Since
25
M23C6 was reported to be nucleated at grain boundaries, less nucleation sites compared to
the assumed dislocation density and high diffusivity along boundaries may be the cause
of the large particles at various boundaries which do not dissolve even though they are
predicted to do so from the modelling.
26
Chapter 6 Conclusions
In this work the as-quenched microstructures of four Fe-C-Cr alloys have been studied,
followed by a study of the precipitation in a martensitic Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy during
tempering by means of experiments and modelling. The results are summarized as
follows:
(1) The dominant martensitic microstructure is lath martensite in low carbon Fe-C-Cr
alloys while a mixture of plate and lath martensite is obtained in high carbon Fe-C-Cr
alloys.
(2) With an increased Cr content from 1.0 to 4.0 mass%, the martensitic microstructure
becomes finer for low carbon steels, and high-angle boundaries are more frequent and
planar defects can be found. Cr in Fe-C-Cr alloys has a similar effect as C on the
martensitic morphology but only a slight influence on the hardness.
(3) Faceted M7C3 and elongated M23C6 are detected in a martensitic Fe-0.15C-4.0Cr alloy
during tempering at 700oC; both types of carbides are nucleated at various boundaries
as well as within the lath, but most of the coarsened precipitates are found at
boundaries.
(4) The interfacial energy as well as dislocation density has a significant influence on the
precipitation as seen from the modelling.
(5) The simplified growth model using the tie-line across the bulk composition
underestimate significantly the size of particles that grow under the NPLE condition,
leading to a deviation of the modelling result for M7C3 compared to experimental
results at the beginning stage of precipitation.
27
Chapter 7 Future Work
In order to fully understand and model the precipitation behavior in Fe-C-Cr alloys
during tempering, a number of future challenges should be addressed:
(1) The dislocation density has a large influence on the precipitation when the
dislocations are assumed to be the heterogeneous nucleation sites. However, since it
is hard to get a precise value this parameter was taken from previous works for a
similar microstructure and composition. The dislocation density could instead be
measured using experimental methods such as TEM techniques, X-ray diffraction
(XRD) and neutron techniques, and thus it could make the modelling results much
more reliable and improve the predictive capability.
(2) In the present work, the effect of interfacial energy on the precipitation has been
studied, and the modelling result shows that the interfacial energy is a critical
parameter for the precipitation. However, reliable experimental data of the interfacial
energy is still limited due to the difficulty of measuring the solid/solid interfacial
energy. The interfacial energy in the present work was estimated using the nearest
neighbour broken bond (NNBB) approach and adjusted slightly to fit the
experimental data. The orientation relationship between the matrix and the precipitate
has not been considered though it is known that the orientation relationship is a
crucial factor when calculating the interfacial energy. Therefore, better estimates of
the interfacial energy could be made by establishing the orientation relationship
between the precipitate and matrix.
(3) In the present work the precipitates are nucleated at various boundaries and in
martensite laths. The condition for each type of nucleation site, e.g. interfacial energy
is probably quite different. However, in the present work, such details about the
nucleation sites are not considered. The fraction of each nucleation site type for each
precipitate phase could be quantified and used to improve the modelling.
(4) As already described, the shortest tempering time is from 5s at 700oC, at which the
nucleation stage seems to be already completed. Since the very early stage and the
chemical composition of the precipitate has a strong influence on later growth and
coarsening, an analysis of short-time tempered samples by advanced experimental
methods e.g. Atom-probe tomography (APT), may shed some light on what is the
28
governing condition at the carbide/matrix phase interface: NPLE, PLE or something
else.
29
References
[1] H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, R. Honeycombe: Steels: microstructure and properties. The
tempering of martensite steels (Oxford, OX: United Kingdom Elsevier Publishing
Company, 2006), 183-208.
[2] G.E. Totten: Steel heat treatment: Metallurgy and technologies (London, LON: LLC
Taylor & Francis Group, 2006), p207.
[3] V. Velay, G. Bernhart, L. Penazzi: Cyclic behavior modeling of a tempered
martensitic hot work tool steel, Int. J. Plasticity, 2006, 22 (3): 459-496.
[4] J. Andersson: Secondary hardening in some low-chromium hot-work tool steels.
Ph.D thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. 2011.
[5] S. M. H. Hoseiny: Influence of microstructure on the machinability of prehardened
mould steels. Chalmers University of Technology. 2011.
[6] F. Abe, M. Taneike1, K. Sawada: Alloy design of creep resistant 9Cr steel using a
dispersion of nano-sized carbonitrides, Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip, 2007, 84 (1-2): 3-12.
[7] M.C. Mataya, R.A. Fournelle: Fatigue behavior of a nial precipitation hardening
medium carbon steel, Metall. Trans. A, 1978, 9 (7): 917-925.
[8] M.F. Ashby, H. Shercliff, D. Cebon: Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing
and Design, Published by Elsevier, L td. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2007, 209.
[9] J.W. Martin: Precipitation hardening. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. 1968.
[10] S. Yamasaki: Modelling precipitation of carbides in martensitic Steels. Ph.D thesis,
Darwin College, University of Cambridge. 2004.
[11] P. Michaud, D. Deslagnes, P. Lamesle, M. H. Mathon, C. Levaillant: The effect of
the addition of alloying elements on carbide precipitation and mechanical properties
in 5% chromium martensitic steels, Acta Mater., 2007, 55 (14): 4877-4889.
[12] T.Ohmura, K.Tsuzaki, S.Matsuoka: Evaluation of the matrix strength of Fe-0.4 wt%
C tempered martensite using nanoindentation techniques. Philos. Mag. A, 2002,
82(10): 1903-1910.
[13] T.Ohmura, T.Hara, K.Tsuzaki: Evaluation of temper softening behavior of Fe-C
binary martensitic steels by nanoindentation. Scr. Mater., 2003, 49(12):1157-1162.
30
[14] T.Ohmura, T.Hara, K.Tsuzaki: Relationship between nanohardness and
microstructures in high-purity Fe-C as-quenched and quench-tempered martensite. J.
Mater. Res., 2003, 18(6):1465-1470.
[15] T.Ohmura, K.Tsuzaki: Evaluation of matrix strength of Fe-C as-quenched and
quench-tempered martensite using nanoindentation techniques. J. Phys. IV France,
2003, 112: 267-270.
[16] T. Ohmura, T. Hara, K. Tsuzaki, H. Nakatsu, Y. Tamura: Mechanical
characterization of secondary-hardening martensitic steel using nanoindentation. J.
Mater. Res., 2004, 19(1): 79-84.
[17] C.E.I.C. Ohlund, Erik Schlangen, S. Erik Offerman: The kinetics of softening and
microstructure evolution of martensite in Fe-C-Mn steel during tempering at 300 °C.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 560: 351-357.
[18] N. Mébarki: Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of
tempered martensitic steel. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines Paris
(in French). 2003.
[19] M.A. Asadabad, S. Kheirandish, A.J. Novinrooz: Microstructural and mechanical
behavior of 4.5Cr-2W-0.25V-0.1C steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527 (6): 1612-
1616.
[20] K. Frisk: Simulation of precipitation of secondary carbides in hot work tool steels,
Mater. Sci. Tech., 2012, 28 (3): 288-294.
[21] A.M. Sherman, G.T. Eldis, M. Cohen: The aging and tempering of iron-nickel-
carbon martensites, Metall Trans, A, 1983, 14: 995-1005.
[22] H.J. Jou, P. Voorhees, G.B. Olson: Computer simulations for the prediction of
microstructure/property variation in aero turbine disks, Proc. Superalloys 2004,
Champion, PA, USA, September 2004, TMS, 877-886.
[23] L. Cheng, C.M. Brakman, B.M. Korevaar, E.J. Mittemeijer: The tempering of iron-
carbon martensite; dilatometric and calorimetric analysis, Metall. Trans, A. 1988, 19
(10): 2415-2426.
[24] J. Janovec, M. Svoboda, A. Vyrostkova, A. Kroupa: Time-temperature-precipitation
diagrams of carbide evolution in low alloy steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 402 (1-
2): 288-293.
31
[25] K. Miyata, M. Igarashi, Y. Sawaragi: Effect of trace elements on creep properties of.
0.06C-2.25Cr-1.6W-0.1Mo-0.25V-0.05Nb steel, ISIJ Int., 1999, 39 (9): 947-954.
[26] K. Frisk: Simulation of precipitation of secondary carbides in hot work tool steels,
Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28 (3): 288-294.
[27] X.B. Hu, M. Zhang, X.C. Wu and L. Li: Simulations of coarsening behavior for
M23C6 carbides in AISI H13 steel, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2006, 22 (2): 153-158.
[28] D.N. Seidman: Three-Dimensional Atom-Probe Tomography: Advances and
Applications, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2007. 37:127-158.
[29] D.N. Seidman, K. Stiller: An atom-probe tomography primer, MRS Bull., 2009. 34:
717-724.
[30] M. Perez, A. Deschamps: Microscopic modelling of simultaneous two phase
precipitation: application to carbide precipitation in low carbon steels, Mater. Sci.
Eng. A, 2003, 360 (1-2): 214-219.
[31] P.F. Shi, A. Engström, B. Sundman, J. Ågren: Thermodynamic calculations and
kinetic simulations of some advanced materials, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2011, 675-677:
961-974.
[32] A. Costa e Silva, L. Nakamura, F. Rizzo: Application of computational modeling to
the kinetics of precipitation of aluminum nitride in steels, J. Min. Metall. B, 2012, 48
(3): 471-476.
[33] R. Mukherjee, T.A. Abinandanan, M.P. Gururajan: Phase field study of precipitate
growth: Effect of misfit strain and interface curvature, Acta Mater., 2009, 57 (13):
3947-3954.
[34] L.Q. Chen: Phase-field models for microstructure evolution, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.,
2002, 32: 113-140.
[35] A. Borgenstam, A. Engström, L. Höglund, J. Ågren: A tool for simulation of
diffusional transformations in alloys, J. Phase Equilib., 2000, 21: 269-280.
[36] W. Cao, S.L. Chen, F. Zhang, K. Wu, Y. Yang, Y.A. Chang, R. Schmid-Fetzer, W.A.
Oates: PANDAT software with PanEngine, PanOptimizer and PanPrecipitation for
multi-component phase diagram calculation and materials property simulation,
Calphad, 2009, 33(2):328-342.
32
[37] N. Fujita: Modelling carbide precipitation in alloy steels. Ph.D thesis, University of
Cambrige, 2000.
[38] P. Schaaf, A. Krämer, S. Wiesen, U. Gonser: Mössbauer study of iron carbides:
mixed carbides M7C3 and M23C6, Acta Metal. Mater., 1994, 42 (9): 3077-3081.
[39] Q. Chen, J. Jeppsson, J. Ågren: Analytical treatment of diffusion during precipitate
growth in multicomponent systems, Acta Mater., 2008, 56 (8): 1890-1896.
[40] O. Prat, J. García, D. Rojas, J.P. Sanhueza, C. Camurri: Study of nucleation, growth
and coarsening of precipitates in a novel 9%Cr heat resistant steel: Experimental and
modeling, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, 143 (2): 754-764.
[41] O. Prat, J. García, D. Rojas, C. Carrasco, G. Inden: Investigations on the growth
kinetics of laves phase precipitates in 12% Cr creep-resistant steels: experimental
and DICTRA calculations, Acta Mater., 2010, 58 (18): 6142-6153.
[42] Z.Y. Hou, P. Hedström, Y.B. Xu, D. Wu, J. Odqvist: Microstructure of martensite in
Fe-C-Cr and its implications for modelling of carbide precipitation during tempering,
ISIJ Int., 2014, 54 (11): 2649-2656.
[43] Z.Y. Hou, P. Hedström, Q. Chen, Y.B. Xu, W. Di, J. Odqvist: In manuscript 2015.
[44] L. Delaey: Diffusionless transformations. In: Cahn R W, Haasen P, Kramer E J (eds.)
Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 5, Phase Transformations in Materials. 1991,
VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
[45] V. A. Pozdnyakov: Mechanisms of martensite nucleation at grain boundaries, Dokl.
Phys., 2007, 52 (1): 24-28.
[46] B.C. Muddle, J.F. Nie: Martensite. encyclopedia of materials: science and
technology, Elsevier Science Ltd. 2001, p5189-p5193.
[47] G. Kruss, A.R. Marder: The morphology of martensite in iron alloys, Metall. Trans.
1971, 2:2343-2357.
[48] S. Morito, J. Niskawa, T. Maki: Dislocation density within lath martensite in Fe-C
and Fe-Ni alloys, ISIJ Int., 2003, 43 (9): 1475-1477.
[49] S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki: The morphology and
crystallography of lath martensite in Fe-C alloys, Acta Mater., 2003, 51 (6): 1789-
1799.
33
[50] T. Maki: Microstructure and mechanical behavior of ferrous martensite, Mater. Sci.
Forum, 1990, 56-58: 157-168.
[51] M. Umemoto, K. Minoda, I. Tamura: Some characteristics of the substructure of
lenticular martensite in Fe-Ni-C alloys, Metallography, 1982, 15 (2): 177-191.
[52] P. M. Kelly, J. Nutting: The martensite transformation in carbon steels, Proc. Roy.
Soc. London A, 1960, 259: 45-48.
[53] P.M. Kelly: The martensite transformation in steels with low stacking fault energy,
Acta Metall., 1965, 13 (6): 635-646.
[54] M. Umemoto, E.Yoshitake, I. Tamura: The morphology of martensite in Fe-C, Fe-
Ni-C and Fe-C-Cr alloys, J. Mater. Sci., 1983, 18 (10): 2893-2904.
[55] A. Stormvinter, P. Hedström, A. Borgenstam: Transmission electron microscopy
study of plate martensite formation in high-carbon low alloy steels, J. Mater. Sci.
Technol., 2013, 29 (4): 373-379.
[56] S. Morito, H. Tanaka, R. Konishi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki: The morphology and
crystallography of lath martensite in Fe-C alloys, Acta Mater., 2003, 51 (6): 1789-
1799.
[57] T. Furuhara, S. Morito, T. Maki: Morphology, substructure and crystallography of
lath martensite in Fe-C alloys, J. Phys. IV France, 2003, 112 (1): 255-258.
[58] A. Stormvinter, P. Hedström, A. Borgenstam: Investigation of lath and plate
martensite in a carbon steel, Solid State Phenomena, 2011, 172-174: 61-66.
[59] S. Morito, X. Huang, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, N. Hansen: The morphology and
crystallography of lath martensite in alloy steels, Acta Mater., 2006, 54 (13): 5323-
5331.
[60] S. Morito, Y. Adachi, T. Ohba: Morphology and crystallography of sub-blocks in
ultra-low carbon lath martensite steel, Mater. Trans., 2009, 50 (8): 1919-1923.
[61] R. Kampmann, R. Wagner Softening: Kinetics of precipitation in metastable binary
alloys-theory and application to Cu-1.9 at % Ti and Ni-14 at % Al, in decoposition
of Alloys: the Early stages, P. Haasen,V. Gerold, R.Wagner and M.F. Ashby, eds.,
Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1984.
34
[62] H. Zurob, C. Hutchinson, Y. Bréchet, G. Purdy: Modeling recrystallization of
microalloyed austenite: effect of coupling recovery, precipitation and
recrystallization, Acta Mater., 2002, 50 (12): 3077-3094.
[63] T. Gladman: The Physical Metallurgy of Microalloyed Steels, The Institute of
Materials, London, 2002.
[64] M. Hillert: Inhibition of grain-growth by 2nd-phase particles, Acta Metall., 1988, 36
(12): 3177-3181.
[65] T. Yokota, T. Shiraga: Evaluation of hydrogen content trapped by vanadium
precipitates in a steel, ISIJ Int. 2003, 43 (4): 534-538.
[66] K. Maruyama, K. Sawada, J. Koike: Strengthening mechanisms of creep resistant
tempered martensitic steel, ISIJ Int., 2001, 41 (6): 641-653.
[67] F. Abe: Bainitic and martensitic creep-resistant Steels, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater.
Sci., 2004, 8: 305-311.
[68] J.O. Andersson, T. Helander, L. Höglund, P.F. Shi, B. Sundman: Thermo-Calc and
DICTRA, Computational tools for materials science. Calphad, 2002, 26: 273-312.
[69] Thermo-Calc Software TCFE7 Steels/Fe-alloys database version 7, (Accessed 15
June 2015).
[70] D. V. Sridhara Rao, K. Muraleedharan, C. J. Humphreys, TEM specimen preparation
techniques, Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education A.
Méndez-Vilas and J. Díaz (Eds.) 2010, 1232-1244.
[71] M.J. Jr. Donachie, O.H. Kriege: Phase extraction and analysis in super alloys-
summary of investigation by ASTM committee E-4 task group 1, J. Mater., 1972, 7:
269-278.
[72] K.L. Lin: Phase identification using series of selected area diffraction patterns and
energy dispersive spectrometry within TEM, Microsc. Res., 2014, 2: 57-66.
[73] A. L. Rivas, E. Vidal, D.K. Matlock, J.G. Speer: Electrochemical extraction of
microalloy carbides in Nb-steel. Revista de Metalurgia, 2008, 44 (5): 447-456.
[74] D. Kashchiev, Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications, Butterworth Heinemann,
Oxford, 2000.