7
Proc. World Maricul. SOC. 10:781-787 (1979) STUDIES ON COMPOUNDED D I E T S FOR Penaeus kerathurus SHRIMP Fam6n Ferngndez and Francisco Puchal Dpto. de Biologia y Bioquimica Universidad Polit&nica de Barcelona Urge1 187, Barcelona 36, Spain ABSTRACT The apparent large differences in nutritive requirements reported for different shrimp species precludes extrapolation of available data from one species to another. This fact and the general scarcity of knowledge about crustacean dietary requirements presents a formidable problem to the nutritionist when beginning with a new shrimp candidate. The species used in these experiments was the Penaeus kerathurus, a shrimp native to the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean coastline. A total of 1,000 postlarvae were used in six experimental trials, concerned with the acceptability of formulated rations and the effectiveness of different protein sources, and considering previous techniques carried out in this field. Other aspects examined were the influence of natural food (mussel mantle and gonad) as a complement to the artificial diet, and the presence in it of an unidentified growth factor(s). From the results obtained, the acceptability of the compounded diets stands out. However, these diets failed to support greater than 50-55% of the fresh mussel diet growth in all experiments. This observation and the strong reduction in nutritional value of the fresh food by pro- cessing are related by two possible explanations: first, the rapid leaching of water-soluble nutrients, and second, the idea of a labile unknown metabolite essential for the growth of these animals. INTRODUCTION The shrimp Penaeus kerathurus is a commercially valuable species of the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean coastline. In the natural envi- ronment, the selection of food during the year by this species has been studied by San Feliu and Alcaraz (1971). According to these authors, 80% of the stomach content is constituted of crustaceans, molluscs and polychetes, in that order. ments, such as mud and sand. Nothing is known, however, about specific nutrient requirements of this species under controlled culture condi- tions. There is also an appreciable amount of sedi- During the last few years, a number of investigators have been 781

STUDIES ON COMPOUNDED DIETS FOR Penaeus kerathurus SHRIMP

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Proc. World Maricul. SOC. 10:781-787 (1979)

S T U D I E S ON COMPOUNDED D I E T S

FOR P e n a e u s k e r a t h u r u s S H R I M P

Fam6n Ferngndez and Francisco Puchal Dpto. de Biologia y Bioquimica

Universidad P o l i t & n i c a de Barcelona Urge1 187, Barcelona 36, Spain

ABSTRACT

The apparent l a r g e d i f f e r e n c e s i n n u t r i t i v e requirements reported f o r d i f f e r e n t shrimp s p e c i e s precludes e x t r a p o l a t i o n o f a v a i l a b l e d a t a from one s p e c i e s t o another . This f a c t and t h e genera l s c a r c i t y of knowledge about c rus tacean d i e t a r y requirements p r e s e n t s a formidable problem t o t h e n u t r i t i o n i s t when beginning with a new shrimp candidate .

The s p e c i e s used i n t h e s e experiments w a s t h e Penaeus kera thurus , a shrimp n a t i v e t o t h e e a s t e r n A t l a n t i c and Mediterranean c o a s t l i n e . A t o t a l o f 1,000 p o s t l a r v a e were used i n s i x experimental t r i a l s , concerned w i t h t h e a c c e p t a b i l i t y of formulated r a t i o n s and t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of d i f f e r e n t p r o t e i n sources , and cons ider ing previous techniques c a r r i e d o u t i n t h i s f i e l d . Other aspec ts examined w e r e t h e inf luence of n a t u r a l food (mussel mant le and gonad) as a complement t o t h e a r t i f i c i a l d i e t , and t h e presence i n it of an u n i d e n t i f i e d growth f a c t o r ( s ) .

From t h e r e s u l t s obtained, t h e a c c e p t a b i l i t y of t h e compounded d i e t s s t a n d s out . However, t h e s e d i e t s f a i l e d t o suppor t g r e a t e r than 50-55% of t h e f r e s h mussel d i e t growth i n a l l experiments. This observat ion and t h e s t rong reduct ion i n n u t r i t i o n a l va lue of t h e f r e s h food by pro- cess ing a r e r e l a t e d by t w o p o s s i b l e explana t ions : f i r s t , t h e rap id leaching o f water-soluble n u t r i e n t s , and second, t h e idea of a l a b i l e unknown metabol i te e s s e n t i a l f o r the growth of t h e s e animals.

INTRODUCTION

The shrimp Penaeus kera thurus i s a commercially va luable spec ies of t h e Eastern A t l a n t i c and Mediterranean c o a s t l i n e . In t h e n a t u r a l envi- ronment, t h e s e l e c t i o n of food dur ing the year by t h i s spec ies has been s t u d i e d by San F e l i u and Alcaraz (1971). According to these au thors , 80% of t h e stomach content i s c o n s t i t u t e d o f c rus taceans , molluscs and polychetes , i n t h a t o rder . ments, such a s mud and sand. Nothing i s known, however, about s p e c i f i c n u t r i e n t requirements of t h i s s p e c i e s under c o n t r o l l e d c u l t u r e condi- t i o n s .

There i s also an apprec iab le amount of sedi-

During t h e l a s t few y e a r s , a number o f i n v e s t i g a t o r s have been

781

involved i n shrimp n u t r i t i o n a l s tud ie s and considerable l i t e r a t u r e i s now ava i lab le on this subjec t . s u l t s obtained with the va r i e ty of shrimp species under d i f f e r ing ex- perimental conditions, together with the apparent l a rge d i f fe rences i n t h e i r n u t r i t i v e requirements, make it d i f f i c u l t i s not impossible to ex- t r apo la t e ava i lab le da ta from one species t o another.

The ob jec t of t h i s work was, therefore , t o test the acceptab i l i ty of formulated r a t ions and the e f fec t iveness of d i f f e r e n t pro te in sources, considering previous techniques ca r r i ed o u t i n t h i s f i e l d , i n order t o f i n d a standard d i e t which would replace t h e f resh mussel mantle and gonad t i s s u e present ly used a s a cont ro l .

Nevertheless, t h e g r e a t d ive r s i ty of re-

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A t o t a l o f 1,000 post-larval shrimp hatched i n the Fishery Research I n s t i t u t e , Castellon (Spain), were used i n t h e severa l experimental t r i a l s reported i n t h i s paper. The shrimp were lodged i n rectangular flow-through seawater tanks (300 l i t e r s and 0.5 m 2 ) . Each tank w a s pro- vided with a s e t of movable p l a s t i c mesh d iv iders , which allowed varia- t ions i n t h e number of ava i l ab le experimental sections. The v a r i a b i l i t y i n t h e growth pa t t e rn found i n these animals w a s compensated f o r by rep- l i c a t i n g each treatment from 2 t o 4 times.

The experiments were ca r r i ed o u t sequent ia l ly once the conclusions of the preceding ones were known. Since no d i e t was estimated t o be s u f f i c i e n t f o r t he feeding t r i a l s a s t o the n u t r i t i o n a l requirements of t he shrimp, severa l d i s t i n c t l y d i f f e r e n t d i e t s were tes ted .

I n i t i a l l y , t he d i e t s w e r e formulated by l i n e a r programming accord- ing t o some o f the premises pointed out by Kitabayashi e t a l . (1971a-d) and Deshimaru and Shigeno (1972), bu t using typ ica l animal feed ingre- d ien ts . As t he t r a i l s progressed, these d i e t s were replaced by o thers with pro te in of superior b io logica l value, i . e . , squid meal, shrimp meal and freeze-dried mussel mantle and gonad meal. Tables 1 and 2 show the composition and ana lys i s of two of t h e d i e t s which supported the bes t growth.

Agar was chosen a s the binding agent i n t h e preparation of the elaborated d i e t s . A volumetric f l a sk containing seawater with agar was allowed t o stand f o r 15 min i n a ho t water bath a t 100°C, then the f l a sk was heated d i r e c t l y with occasional s t i r r i n g u n t i l t h e agar was com- p l e t e ly melted. After cooling t o 50°C, t he so lu t ion was poured i n t o a p l a s t i c box containing the powdered d i e t and thoroughly mixed. l i d i f i e d t h e moist d i e t s were s tored under r e f r ige ra t ion u n t i l used. For comparative purposes and owing t o the v a r i a b i l i t y i n t h e experimen- t a l and environmental conditions among experiments, na tura l food ( f resh mussel mantle and gonad) was used a s a cont ro l i n a l l cases.

feed allowances of each group t o consumption. Leaching r a t e s were as- sessed by weighing t o t a l dry matter recovered by f i l t r a t i o n a f t e r keep- ing the d i e t 8 hours i n seawater, and the r e su l t i ng f igu res were consid- ered i n t h e ca lcu la t ions of feed consumption.

Once so-

The shrimp wexe fed before sunset t o approximate s a t i e t y , adjusting

TABLE 1. Composition o f t h e Experimental D i e t s i n Percent

Ingredien ts D i e t 1 D i e t 2

Squid meal 16.0 50.0 Shrimp m e a l 30.0 16.0 F ish meal--65% p r o t e i n 8.0 8.0 Molasses yeast--70% p r o t e i n 7 .O 7.0 Dextr in 18.5 8.5 Wheat f l o u r 10.0 0.0 Calcium carbonate 1.0 1.0 Calcium phosphate 1.0 1.0 Glucosamine--HC1 0.5 0.5 Glucose 3.5 3.5 Lec i th in 1.0 1.0 Choles te ro l 0 .5 0.5 Vitamin mixa 2 .o 2.0 Mineral mixb 1.0 1.0

Percent t o t a l

Seawater, g/100 q Agar, d 1 0 0 9

100.0 100.0 3.5 3.5

200.0 200.0

aVitamin mix p e r kg o f d r y d i e t : vi tamin A, 25,000 I U ; vitamin D, 2,400 I U ; v i tamin K, 20 mg; vi tamin E , 100 mq; r i b o f l a v i n , 40 mg; nia- c i n , 200 mg; Ca-pantothenate, 300 mg; pyridoxine (HCl), 60 mg; f o l i c a c i d , 4 mg; c h o l i n e c h l o r i d e , 3000 mg; cobalamine, 0.4 mg; b i o t i n , 2 mg; i n o s i t o l , 2000 mg; ascorb ic a c i d , 500 mq; thiamin ( H C l ) , 20 mg; ethoxy- quin, 300 mg.

bMineral mix p e r kg of dry d i e t : i r o n , 18 mg; z i n c , 24 mg; copper, 4 mq; i o d i n e , 1 mg; manganese, 44 mg; magnesium, 80 mg; c o b a l t , 0.2 mg.

TABLE 2 . Analysis of the Experimental D i e t s and Mussel Mantle

Parameters D i e t s ( % on dry b a s i s ) 1 2 3a

Pro te in 40.42 59.38 64.70 Fiber 3.07 1.80 - F a t 4.64 7.76 13.75 Ash 9.12 7 .43 7.62 C a l c i u m 2.78 2.22 0.22 Phosphorus 0.94 0.80 0.96

Amino Acids ( % o f crude p r o t e i n ) Arqinine 3.29 4.44 5.59 Lysine 3.26 4.74 8.38 Methionine 1.17 1.71 2.37 Threonine 1.84 2.97 5.16 Methionine+Cystine 1.45 2.13 3.48

aMussel mantle and gonad.

783

RESULTS

The t y p i c a l p a t t e r n of r e s u l t s comparing t h e f r e s h food c o n t r o l and d i e t s 1 and 2 is shown i n Table 3. S imi la r t o o t h e r experiments, t h e r e w e r e no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s (p 0.05) between e labora ted d i e t s ; how- ever , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s between t h e s e d i e t s and t h e mussel i n growth incre- ment and conversion r a t i o were very s t r i k i n g .

TABLE 3 . Experimental Resul t s f o r Penaeus kera thurus Fed on T e s t Diets (Experimental condi t ions : feeding t r i a l , 30 days; temperature, 2321'C; s tocking r a t e , 30 animals/tank; 2 r e p l i c a t e s ; i n i t i a l mean body weight, 3.15 g ; running seawater , 1.75 l i t e r s / m i n / tank)

Treatments 1 2 3a

Surv iva l r a t e ( 9 ) 92 92 95 Growth increment (g ) 0.821 0.887 1.714 Feed consumptionb (g) 0.247 0.250 0.195 Conversion r a t i o c 9.14 8.49 3.41

aMussel mantle and gonad. bAnimals/day. 'Dry food consumed/live weight gained.

DISCUSSION

F i r s t of a l l , t h e s e experiments provide evidence t h a t t h e s p e c i e s Penaeus kera thurus i n g e s t s compounded d i e t s i n a q u a n t i t y s u p e r i o r even t o t h e n a t u r a l food o f mussel mantle and gonad with good s u r v i v a l and without p a l a t a b i l i t y problems. However, the s t rong d i f f e r e n c e s i n growth increment between f r e s h mussel and e labora ted d i e t s , i n a l l t h e experi- ments, r e q u i r e p a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n .

The requirement by penaeid shrimp f o r d i e t a r y s t e r o l , owing t o t h e lack of b iosynthes is of t h i s substance from a c e t a t e , has been repor ted by s e v e r a l au thors (Kanazawa e t a l . , 1971; Shudo e t a l . , 1971; Deshimaru and Kuroki, 1974) . The i n c l u s i o n o f c h o l e s t e r o l i n our d i e t s a t t h e l e v e l of 0.1% r e s u l t e d i n improving t h e growth increment from 30 t o 40% i n r e l a t i o n t o mussel mantle and gonad growth. Fur ther increases of s t e r o l component t o 0.5% i n subsequent d i e t e v a l u a t i o n s , however, d i d n o t show b e t t e r r e s u l t s .

The u t i l i z a t i o n o f p r o t e i n - r i c h meals with s i m i l a r amino a c i d com- p o s i t i o n t o t h e shrimp, i . e . , squid m e a l (Kitabayashi e t a l . , 1971a; Deshimaru and Shigeno, 1972; K i t t a k a , 1975) and shrimp meal (Grajcer and Neal, 1972; Zein-Eldin and Meyers, 1973) produced a not iceable increase i n consumption, b u t f a i l e d t o promote growth rates g r e a t e r than 55% of those achieved using t h e mussel d i e t . S i m i l a r l y , t h e use of compounded d i e t s e labora ted with t y p i c a l animal feed i n g r e d i e n t s and formulated by l i n e a r programming t o match t h e amino a c i d d i s t r i b u t i o n r a t i o of P . ke- r a t h u r u s meat showed t h e same r e s u l t s .

Considering t h e d i v e r s i t y of i n g r e d i e n t s used i n d i e t e l a b o r a t i o n s t o g e t h e r with t h e g r e a t v a r i a t i o n o f n u t r i t i v e parameters r e f l e c t e d i n

784

them, it i s d i f f i c u l t t o suppor t t h e idea t h a t i n some ins tances t h e n u t r i t i v e requirements have n o t been s a t i s f i e d . But t h e above r e s u l t s and t h e uniform growth o f j u v e n i l e shrimp reared on experimental d i e t s would sugges t t h e shrimp w e r e n o t rece iv ing some unknown metabol i te(s1 o r s p e c i f i c n u t r i e n t ( s ) e s s e n t i a l f o r t h e growth of these animals. This n u t r i e n t , absent i n t h e e labora ted d i e t s b u t p r e s e n t i n t h e f r e s h mus- se l , would prevent t h e shrimp from expressing t h e i r growth p o t e n t i a l , thus masking t h e response t o t h e d i f f e r e n t d i e t s .

The evidence f o r a growth f a c t o r i n some f r e s h food (mussel mantle and c r a b gonad and d i g e s t i v e gland) was suggested by F o r s t e r and Beard (1973) during t h e i r experiments wi th Palaemon s e r r a t u s . These au thors , s u b s t i t u t i n g t h e compounded d i e t one day a week f o r some of t h e f r e s h foods mentioned above, could improve t h e n u t r i t i v e va lue of these combi- na t ions t o t h e l e v e l of t h e f r e s h mussel mantle i t s e l f . The same sub- s t i t u t i o n c a r r i e d o u t with P. kera thurus produced a s i g n i f i c a n t improve- ment i n growth increment and conversion ra t io , b u t d i d not approach t h e r e s u l t o f f r e s h mussel i t s e l f . I n t h i s r e s p e c t , p a r t i a l explanat ion could l i e i n t h e f a c t t h a t t h e shrimp r e j e c t e d t h e compounded d i e t the day a f t e r feeding with mussel mantle and gonad.

t i t y of f r e s h food a s a complement t o t h e a r t i f i c i a l d i e t t o g e t good r e s u l t s was a l s o showed by Ki t taka (1975) . On t h e o t h e r hand, the in- c l u s i o n of these f r e s h foods i n t o t h e feed wi th t h e required processing techniques d i d n o t improve t h e q u a l i t y of t h e d i e t s themselves. q u a l i t y loss with process ing has been noted f o r a v a r i e t y of crustacean spec ies : P. serratus ( F o r s t e r and Beard, 1973); Homarus americanus (Conklin e t a l . , 1978); Carcinus maenas (Adelung and Ponat, 1977) . Sur- p r i s i n g l y , the s t r o n g reduct ion i n t h e n u t r i t i o n a l value of t h e mussel mantle and gonad w a s even more pronounced when using it exc lus ive ly , i n f reeze-dr ied form, recording p r a c t i c a l l y no growth increment.

The necess i ty o f cont inuing t o feed t h e shrimp with a c e r t a i n quan-

This

I t i s p o s s i b l e t o sugges t two explana t ions of t h e above r e s u l t s . F i r s t , t h e r a p i d leaching o f water-soluble substances leads t o t h e sub- optimal a m u n t o f e s s e n t i a l n u t r i e n t s a v a i l a b l e t o t h e animal. In t h i s c a s e , w e can a l s o assume an i n c r e a s e i n t h e leaching of s p e c i f i c n u t r i - e n t s a f t e r processing t h e f r e s h food. Recent exper inents being c a r r i e d o u t a t t h e Bodega Marine Laboratory are i n v e s t i g a t i n g t h i s p o s s i b i l i t y .

The second explana t ion would be t h e suggest ion r a i s e d by F o r s t e r and Beard (1973) t h a t t h e p o s s i b l e growth f a c t o r ( s ) i s destroyed o r de- natured by process ing of any kind. a c i d s i n f reeze-dr ied s t o r e d Myti lus e d u l i s was repor ted by Ranke and Ranke (Adelung and Ponat, 1977) . This process could a l s o a f f e c t o t h e r p a r t i c u l a r components o f t h e f r e s h food s t r o n g l y implicated i n t h e growth of these animals . In a d d i t i o n , we cannot d i s c a r d a combination of these two p o s s i b i l i t i e s .

The d e s t r u c t i o n of p r o t e i n and amino

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would l i k e t o express our a p p r e c i a t i o n t o D r . Douglas E. Conklin f o r h i s a s s i s t a n c e i n prepar ing t h i s manuscr ipt .

785

LITERATURE CITED

Adelung, D . , and A. Ponat. 1977. Studies t o e s t ab l i sh an optimal d i e t f o r the decapod crab Carcinus maenas under cu l tu re conditions. Marine Biology 44:287-292.

McConnick. 1978. A r t i f i c i a l d i e t s f o r t he l o b s t e r , Homarus ameri- canus, a revaluation. Proceedings World Mariculture Society

Conklin, D. E . , M. J. Goldblatt , C. E. Bordner, N. A. Baum, and T. B.

9: 243-250.

Deshimaru, O . , and K. Kuroki. 1974. Studies on a pu r i f i ed d i e t fo r

Bul le t in of t he Japanese Society of S c i e n t i f i c F isher ies prawn. 11. Optimum contents of choles te ro l and glucosamine i n the d i e t . 40 :421-424.

Deshimaru, O . , and K. Shigeno. 1972. Introduction t o the a r t i f i c i a l d i e t f o r prawn, Penaeus japonicus. Aquaculture 1:115-133.

Fors te r , J. R. M . , and T. W. Beard. 1973. Growth experiments with the prawn Palaemon s e r r a t u s fed with f r e sh and compounded foods. Fishery Inves t iga t ions 11, 2 7 ( 7 ) , 16 pp.

Grajcer, D., and R. N e a l . 1972. Growth of hatchery-reared Penaeus az- t e c u s on experimental d i e t s . Proceedings World Mariculture Society 3 : 461-470.

Kanazawa, A. , N . Tanaka, S. Teshima, and K. Kashiwada. 1971. Nutri- t i o n a l requirements f o r prawn. 11. Requirement f o r s t e r o l s . Bul- l e t i n of t h e Japanese Society of S c i e n t i f i c F isher ies 37:211-215.

1971a. Studies on formula feed f o r Kuruma prawn. I. On the re la - t ionship among glucosamine, phosphorus and calcium. Bul le t in of t he Tokai Regional F isher ies Research Laboratory 65:91-107.

Kitabayashi, K. , K. Shudo, K. Nakamura, and S. Ishikawa. 1971b. Studies on formula feed f o r Kuruma prawn. 11. On the u t i l i z a t i o n values of glucose. Bul le t in of t h e Tokai Regional F isher ies Re- search Laboratory 65:109-118.

Studies on formula feed f o r K u W a prawn. 111. On the growth- promoting e f f e c t s of both a rg in ine and methionine. Bul le t in of t he Tokai Regional F isher ies Research Laboratory 65:119-127.

Studies on formula feed f o r Kuruma prawn. V. On t h e growth- promoting e f f e c t s of pro te in l eve l i n a d i e t and re-examination of -ingredients used. search Laboratory 65:139-147.

F i r s t In te rna t iona l Conference on Aquaculture Nut r i t ion , pp. 249- 285.

Kitabayashi, K . , H. Kurata, K. Shudo, K. Nakamura, and S. Ishikawa.

Kitabayashi, K. , K. Shudo, K. Nakamura, and S. Ishikawa. 1971c.

Kitabayashi, K . , K. Shudo, K. Nakamura, and S. Ishikawa. 1971d.

Bul le t in of t h e Tokai Regional F isher ies Re-

Kittaka, J. 1975. Food and growth of penaeid shrimp. Proceedings

San Fe l iu , J. M . , and M. Alcaraz. 1971. Estudio de l a alimentaci6n en e l langostino. Pesca Maritima 9 :239-252.

Publicaciones Tgcnicas de l a Direccion General de

7 86

Shudo, K . , K. Nakamura, S. Ishikawa, and K. Ki tabayashi . 1971. Studies on formula feed f o r Kuruma prawn. I V . On t h e growth-promoting e f - f e c t s f o r both squid l i v e r o i l and c h o l e s t e r o l . B u l l e t i n of t h e Tokai Regional F i s h e r i e s Research Laboratory 65:129-137.

Zein-Eldin, Z. P. , and S. P. Meyers. 1973. General cons idera t ions of problems i n shrimp n u t r i t i o n . Proceedings World Maricul ture So- c i e t y 4:299-317.

707