12
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE PRESENTATION TITLE SUBTITLE NAME Management Partnership Services, Inc. Student Transportation Consulting Services STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT Providence Public School District Andy Forsyth Management Partnership Services, Inc January 14, 2013 Student Transportation Consulting Services

STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

  • Upload
    haru

  • View
    63

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Student Transportation Consulting Services. STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT. Providence Public School District Andy Forsyth Management Partnership Services, Inc January 14, 2013. Project scope. Transportation Operations Review Policies and procedures Department operations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE

PRESENTATION TITLE

SUBTITLE

NAMEManagement Partnership Services, Inc.

S t u d e n t T r a n s p o r t a t i o nC o n s u l t i n gS e r v i c e s

STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

Providence Public School District

Andy ForsythManagement Partnership Services, Inc

January 14, 2013

S t u d e n t T r a n s p o r t a t i o nC o n s u l t i n gS e r v i c e s

Page 2: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEPROJECT SCOPE

Transportation Operations Review Policies and procedures Department operations Management & organization Routing efficiency & planning

Bell Time & Routing Alternatives Staggered bell schedules: 3-tier Routing options

Page 3: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE KEY PROGRAM STRENGTHS

• Use of route planning technology• Experienced staff• Reasonable service delivery• Responsive to customer concerns• Reasonably effective use of fleet resources

Page 4: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE KEY PROGRAM WEAKNESSES

• Fragmented policies & procedures• High cost• Student information late & not validated• Limited run (trip) linkages• Schedule lateness• Inadequate contract management process• Cumbersome supervision & accountability: Aides & TA’s

Page 5: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEACHIEVING EFFICIENCY

Fill the Bus Use the Bus

Page 6: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEBELL TIMES & EFFICIENCY

Middle School

Early Elementary School

Late Elementary School

8:30

= 3 Bus

Fleet

Page 7: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLERUN LINKAGES = EFFICIENCY

7:30 8:15 9:15

High School

Middle School

Elementary School

= 1 Bus Fleet

Page 8: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEWHERE DOES PPSD STAND?

Key Performance Indicator Guideline PPSD Value

Transportation cost as a percent of District-wide budget 4 - 6 % 6%

Cost per student (Total) $1,115 - $1,315 $1,460

Daily cost per bus $325 - $460 $547

Average runs per bus (AM or PM) 2.50 1.67

Avg. buses per 100 transported students 1.10 - 1.34 1.37

Utilized planned rider capacity 70% - 85% 70.0%

Support personnel as a percent of fleet size 5% - 8% 8.0%

Average special ed. ride time 60 min. 1:12

Percent of special ed. routes with bus aides 55% 100.0%

Page 9: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLECURRENT FLEET DEPLOYMENT

Page 10: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEOPTION 2 FLEET DEPLOYMENT

Page 11: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEBELL TIMES: COST OR BENEFIT

Bell Configuration Peak Deployment

Est. Δ in

Buses

Annual Cost per

BusCost Δ from

Current

Current 144 --- $ 94,063 ---

Option 1: Current Improved 144 --- $ 94,063 ---

Option 2: 3-Tier; Current policy 120 (24) $ 94,063 ($ 2,257,512)

Option 3: 3- tier; Neighborhood enrollment 119 (25) $ 94,063 ($ 2,351,575)

Page 12: STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ASSESSMENT

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLEKEY RECOMMENDATIONS

• Priority 1– Clear & concise policies, administrative directives– Better student information verification procedures in spring– Revised bell times & reengineer routes– RIF for on-board district support employees

• Priority 2– Outcome-based contractor requirements– Contract management plan– Restructure positions: Route foremen– Increase supervisor authority/ accountability