Upload
colm
View
56
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Student Learning Objectives. Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013. Student Learning Objectives. District Professional Development is the Key. Teacher/Principal Evaluation Requirements. 2010 Education Reform Act ESEA Flexibility Waiver Race to the Top Grant. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Student Learning Objectives
1
Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013
Student Learning Objectives
District Professional Development is the Key
2
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Requirements
• 2010 Education Reform Act• ESEA Flexibility Waiver• Race to the Top Grant
3
State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth
Planning andPreparation
12.5 %
Instruction
12.5 %
Classroom Environment
12.5 %
Professional Responsibilities
12.5 %
Elementary/Middle School Teacher
Two Content Areas
• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and
• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and
• 10% - School Performance Index
and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives
Elementary/Middle School Teacher
One Content Area
English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)
and• 10% - School Performance Index
and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives
Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)
and• 10% - School Performance Index
and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives
Elementary/Middle School Teacher
Non-Tested Subject
• 15% - School Performance Index
and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives
High SchoolTeacher
• 15% - School Performance Index
and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives
50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%
50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below
oror
9/27/12
oror oror
Local Teacher Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth
Planning andPreparation Instruction Classroom
EnvironmentProfessional
Responsibilities
Elementary/Middle School Teacher
Two Content Areas
• 10 % - Reading MSA (Class)and
• 10 % - Math MSA (Class)and
• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE
Elementary/Middle School Teacher One Content Area
English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)
and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE
Mathematics Teachers:•20% - Math MSA (Class)
and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE
Elementary/Middle School Teacher
Non-Tested Subject
LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%
High SchoolTeacher
LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%
50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE
oror
Additional Domains Based on Local Priorities
50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below
9/27/12
oror oror
State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth
Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement
Elementary/Middle School Principals
•10% - Reading MSA (School)and
• 10% - Math MSA (School)and
• 10% - School Performance Indexand
•20% - Student Learning Objectives
High SchoolPrincipals
•15% - School Performance Indexand
•35% - Student Learning Objectives
Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)
•15% - School Performance Indexand
•35% - Student Learning Objectives
50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%
50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below
Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)
•School Operations and Budget•Effective Communication•Influencing the School Community•Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics
oror
9/27/12
oror
Local Principal Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth
Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement
Elementary/Middle School Principals
• 10 % - Reading MSA (School)and
• 10 % - Math MSA (School)and
• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE
High SchoolPrincipals
LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%
Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)
LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%
Additional Domains Based on Local
Priorities
50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE
50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below
oror
9/27/12
oror
Student Learning ObjectivesQuality Control Components
8
Monitor and Audit
Provide Professional Development Develop Two-Way Communication Plan
Ensure Accountability
Identify High-Quality, Common Measures & Assessments
Determine and Score Rigorous Targets
Establish Priority of Standard
Provide Guidance, Templates, and Tools
8
“Building the skills of teachers and
principals to successfully
implement SLOs is fundamental to success.” (CTAC)
9
SLO Professional Development
“The most effective strategy for training teachers and principals to implement a rigorous, reliable, and valid SLO model is to provide hands-on experience writing an SLO.”
“Teachers often find that they do not know the questions to ask until they are actively engaged in the process. The key is providing support, during training and throughout implementation.” (CTAC)
10
SLO Training Modules
Add graphic
11
SLO Modules
• 7 Training Modules– Module 1 - SLO Context & Purpose – Module 2 - SLO Components – Module 3 - The SLO Process – Module 4 - Quality Assurance: Priority of Standard – Module 5 - Quality Assurance: Rigor of Target – Module 6 - Quality Assurance: Quality of Measure &
Evidence – Module 7 - Quality Assurance: SLO Action Plan
• Companion Handbook
12
Module Outcomes
• After completion of the modules, participants will have completed one SLO and should be prepared to craft additional SLOs and judge their quality using the teacher and principal rubrics.
• The modules are NOT designed as Inter-rater Reliability (IRR) Training
13
Online Demo
https://msde.blackboard.com/
Guest AccessU: slo.guestP: msdelms
14
SLO Workshop Customization
• SLO PD Workshop designed based on State Model
• Copy of Workshop in Blackboard will be provided to each district so that district customization may occur
15
Workshop Access
• Once a district has customized the workshop, it may be accessed in two forms:– Guest Access– Registered User Access
16
Guest Access
• Generic “guest” login and password• Recommended PD Format: Face to Face or
Hybrid• No online access to interactive components –
these will occur in face to face sessions• District provides facilitator and holds as many
PD sessions as desired
17
SLO Workshop for CPD Credit
• Districts must set up Blackboard session with MSDE (Contact: Naku Mayo at [email protected])
• Participants must register through online process• Login and password required• Recommended PD format: virtual or hybrid• Includes online interactive components• District provides facilitator• Participant earns 1 CPD credit
18
SLO Modules HandbookContents•Overview•Customization of Content•Facilitation Guide - Guest Access– Hybrid Format– Face to Face Format
•Facilitation Guide – Workshop for CPD Credit– Course Set Up– First Course Meeting – Face to Face– Online Facilitation– Hybrid Option
19
Considerations for Use of Modules
• Face-to-face vs. online training• Schedule for training• Expertise of facilitators• Review of final SLO products• Document training• Technical requirements• Other considerations?
20
Professional Development Action Plan
LEA Team Activity
21
Moving Forward
Engage broad array of stakeholders in developing district SLO plan
Provide models and templates
Establish written guidelines or rules to help teachers and principal set, implement, & measure SLOs
22
Moving Forward
Build skills of teachers and administrators by providing hands-on experience writing an SLO
Develop a two-way communication plan
Provide support and ensure principals have the skills and knowledge necessary to provide leadership for quality SLO implementation
23
Professional Development Learning Cycle
SLO Professional Development Learning Cycle
DefinitionUnderstand the purpose of SLOs
ValidationUnderstand the importance of SLOs
AssimilationUnderstand the elements and mechanics of the SLO process
IntegrationUnderstand how SLOs are
incorporated into every day instructional practice
TransitionUnderstand the relationship of
SLOs to student achievement
Additional Resources• MSDE Website
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/programs/tpe• SLO Quality Control Toolkit• Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC): Student
Learning Objectives Support Center• Flexibility for Fairness: Crafting Business Rules for Student
Learning Objectives• MSDE Annotated Summary of Teacher/Principal Evaluation
Research: SLO Resources for School Systems
26
Blackboard Resources
• Get On Board With Blackboard• Technology Guidelines for MSDE LMS
(Blackboard)
(Found on the SLO page of the MSDE Teacher/Principal Evaluation website)
27
Evaluation
Thank you for your participation and efforts to implement quality SLOs in your district.
28