28
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013

Student Learning Objectives

  • Upload
    colm

  • View
    56

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Student Learning Objectives. Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013. Student Learning Objectives. District Professional Development is the Key. Teacher/Principal Evaluation Requirements. 2010 Education Reform Act ESEA Flexibility Waiver Race to the Top Grant. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Student Learning Objectives

Student Learning Objectives

1

Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013

Page 2: Student Learning Objectives

Student Learning Objectives

District Professional Development is the Key

2

Page 3: Student Learning Objectives

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Requirements

• 2010 Education Reform Act• ESEA Flexibility Waiver• Race to the Top Grant

3

Page 4: Student Learning Objectives

State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation

12.5 %

Instruction

12.5 %

Classroom Environment

12.5 %

Professional Responsibilities

12.5 %

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and

• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolTeacher

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

oror

9/27/12

oror oror

Page 5: Student Learning Objectives

Local Teacher Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation Instruction Classroom

EnvironmentProfessional

Responsibilities

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10 % - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10 % - Math MSA (Class)and

• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Elementary/Middle School Teacher One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Mathematics Teachers:•20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

High SchoolTeacher

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE

oror

Additional Domains Based on Local Priorities

50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

9/27/12

oror oror

Page 6: Student Learning Objectives

State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

•10% - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10% - Math MSA (School)and

• 10% - School Performance Indexand

•20% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolPrincipals

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)

•School Operations and Budget•Effective Communication•Influencing the School Community•Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics

oror

9/27/12

oror

Page 7: Student Learning Objectives

Local Principal Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

• 10 % - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10 % - Math MSA (School)and

• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

High SchoolPrincipals

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

Additional Domains Based on Local

Priorities

50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE

50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

oror

9/27/12

oror

Page 8: Student Learning Objectives

Student Learning ObjectivesQuality Control Components

8

Monitor and Audit

Provide Professional Development Develop Two-Way Communication Plan

Ensure Accountability

Identify High-Quality, Common Measures & Assessments

Determine and Score Rigorous Targets

Establish Priority of Standard

Provide Guidance, Templates, and Tools

8

Page 9: Student Learning Objectives

“Building the skills of teachers and

principals to successfully

implement SLOs is fundamental to success.” (CTAC)

9

Page 10: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Professional Development

“The most effective strategy for training teachers and principals to implement a rigorous, reliable, and valid SLO model is to provide hands-on experience writing an SLO.”

“Teachers often find that they do not know the questions to ask until they are actively engaged in the process. The key is providing support, during training and throughout implementation.” (CTAC)

10

Page 11: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Training Modules

Add graphic

11

Page 12: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Modules

• 7 Training Modules– Module 1 - SLO Context & Purpose – Module 2 - SLO Components – Module 3 - The SLO Process – Module 4 - Quality Assurance: Priority of Standard – Module 5 - Quality Assurance: Rigor of Target – Module 6 - Quality Assurance: Quality of Measure &

Evidence – Module 7 - Quality Assurance: SLO Action Plan

• Companion Handbook

12

Page 13: Student Learning Objectives

Module Outcomes

• After completion of the modules, participants will have completed one SLO and should be prepared to craft additional SLOs and judge their quality using the teacher and principal rubrics.

• The modules are NOT designed as Inter-rater Reliability (IRR) Training

13

Page 14: Student Learning Objectives

Online Demo

https://msde.blackboard.com/

Guest AccessU: slo.guestP: msdelms

14

Page 15: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Workshop Customization

• SLO PD Workshop designed based on State Model

• Copy of Workshop in Blackboard will be provided to each district so that district customization may occur

15

Page 16: Student Learning Objectives

Workshop Access

• Once a district has customized the workshop, it may be accessed in two forms:– Guest Access– Registered User Access

16

Page 17: Student Learning Objectives

Guest Access

• Generic “guest” login and password• Recommended PD Format: Face to Face or

Hybrid• No online access to interactive components –

these will occur in face to face sessions• District provides facilitator and holds as many

PD sessions as desired

17

Page 18: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Workshop for CPD Credit

• Districts must set up Blackboard session with MSDE (Contact: Naku Mayo at [email protected])

• Participants must register through online process• Login and password required• Recommended PD format: virtual or hybrid• Includes online interactive components• District provides facilitator• Participant earns 1 CPD credit

18

Page 19: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Modules HandbookContents•Overview•Customization of Content•Facilitation Guide - Guest Access– Hybrid Format– Face to Face Format

•Facilitation Guide – Workshop for CPD Credit– Course Set Up– First Course Meeting – Face to Face– Online Facilitation– Hybrid Option

19

Page 20: Student Learning Objectives

Considerations for Use of Modules

• Face-to-face vs. online training• Schedule for training• Expertise of facilitators• Review of final SLO products• Document training• Technical requirements• Other considerations?

20

Page 21: Student Learning Objectives

Professional Development Action Plan

LEA Team Activity

21

Page 22: Student Learning Objectives

Moving Forward

Engage broad array of stakeholders in developing district SLO plan

Provide models and templates

Establish written guidelines or rules to help teachers and principal set, implement, & measure SLOs

22

Page 23: Student Learning Objectives

Moving Forward

Build skills of teachers and administrators by providing hands-on experience writing an SLO

Develop a two-way communication plan

Provide support and ensure principals have the skills and knowledge necessary to provide leadership for quality SLO implementation

23

Page 24: Student Learning Objectives

Professional Development Learning Cycle

Page 25: Student Learning Objectives

SLO Professional Development Learning Cycle

DefinitionUnderstand the purpose of SLOs

ValidationUnderstand the importance of SLOs

AssimilationUnderstand the elements and mechanics of the SLO process

IntegrationUnderstand how SLOs are

incorporated into every day instructional practice

TransitionUnderstand the relationship of

SLOs to student achievement

Page 26: Student Learning Objectives

Additional Resources• MSDE Website

http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/programs/tpe• SLO Quality Control Toolkit• Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC): Student

Learning Objectives Support Center• Flexibility for Fairness: Crafting Business Rules for Student

Learning Objectives• MSDE Annotated Summary of Teacher/Principal Evaluation

Research: SLO Resources for School Systems

26

Page 27: Student Learning Objectives

Blackboard Resources

• Get On Board With Blackboard• Technology Guidelines for MSDE LMS

(Blackboard)

(Found on the SLO page of the MSDE Teacher/Principal Evaluation website)

27

Page 28: Student Learning Objectives

Evaluation

Thank you for your participation and efforts to implement quality SLOs in your district.

28