18
CORNELL SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY SERIES STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics BY THE E NVIRONMENTAL I NQUIRY L EADERSHIP T EAM W ILLIAM S. C ARLSEN N ANCY M. T RAUTMANN C HRISTINE M. C UNNINGHAM M ARIANNE E. K RASNY A DAM W ELMAN W ITH T EACHERS H ARRIET B ECK (W ELLSVILLE H IGH S CHOOL ) H ARRY C ANNING (N EWARK V ALLEY H IGH S CHOOL ) M ARK J OHNSON (I THACA H IGH S CHOOL ) AND C ORNELL S CIENTISTS E UGENIA B ARNABA R EUBEN G OFORTH S USAN H OSKINS Arlington, Virginia Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

C O R N E L L S C I E N T I F I C I N Q U I R Y S E R I E S

S T U D E N T E D I T I O N

WatershedDynamics

B Y T H E E N V I R O N M E N TA L I N Q U I R Y L E A D E R S H I P T E A M

WI L L I A M S. C A R L S E N

NA N C Y M. T R A U T M A N N

CH R I S T I N E M. C U N N I N G H A M

MA R I A N N E E. K R A S N Y

AD A M W E L M A N

WI T H T E A C H E R S

HA R R I E T B E C K (W E L L S V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L )HA R R Y C A N N I N G (N E WA R K V A L L E Y H I G H S C H O O L )

MA R K J O H N S O N ( I T H A C A H I G H S C H O O L )

A N D C O R N E L L S C I E N T I S T S

EU G E N I A B A R N A B A

RE U B E N G O F O R T H

SU S A N H O S K I N S

Arl ington, V irginia

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 2: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.96-18142. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Claire Reinburg, DirectorAndrew Cocke, Associate EditorJudy Cusick, Associate EditorBetty Smith, Associate Editor

ART AND DESIGN Linda Olliver, DirectorPRINTING AND PRODUCTION Catherine Lorrain-Hale, Director Nguyet Tran, Assistant Production Manager Jack Parker, Desktop Publishing SpecialistsciLINKS Tyson Brown, Manager David Anderson, Web and Development Coordinator

NATIONAL SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION

Gerald F. Wheeler, Executive DirectorDavid Beacom, Publisher

Copyright © 2004 by the National Science Teachers Association.All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.06 05 04 4 3 2 1

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataWatershed dynamics / by the Environmental Inquiry Leadership Team, William S. Carlsen ... [et al.].— Student ed. p. cm. — (Cornell scientific inquiry series) ISBN 0-87355-213-X 1. Watersheds—Study and teaching (Secondary)—Activity programs. 2. Watershed ecology—Study and teaching(Secondary)—Activity programs. 3. Water quality—Study and teaching (Secondary)—Activity programs. I. Carlsen,William S. II. Series. GB1002.25.W28 2004 551.48—dc22 2004002042

NSTA is committed to publishing quality materials that promote the best in inquiry-based science education. However, conditions ofactual use may vary and the safety procedures and practices described in this book are intended to serve only as a guide. Additionalprecautionary measures may be required. NSTA and the author(s) do not warrant or represent that the procedures and practices inthis book meet any safety code or standard or federal, state, or local regulations. NSTA and the author(s) disclaim any liability forpersonal injury or damage to property arising out of or relating to the use of this book, including any recommendations, instructions,or materials contained therein.

Permission is granted in advance for reproduction for purpose of classroom or workshop instruction. To request permissionfor other uses, send specific requests to: NSTA Press, 1840 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22201-3000. Web site:www.nsta.org

Featuring sciLINKS®—a way to connect text and the Internet. Up-to-the-minute online content, classroomideas, and other materials are just a click away. Go to page xiii to learn more about this educational resource.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 3: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

v

Contents

S T U D E N T E D I T I O NFIGURES AND TABLES IN THE STUDENT EDITION ........................................................................................ viiiPREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................................................ xiSciLinks ........................................................................................................................................................................................ xiii

SECTION 1: UNDERSTANDING WATERSHED DYNAMICS

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO WATERSHED DYNAMICS ........................................................... 3

What Is a Watershed? ...................................................................................................................... 4The Water Cycle ................................................................................................................................ 6Competing Needs for Water .......................................................................................................... 8

CHAPTER 2. WHAT’S IN A WATERSHED? ........................................................................................... 11

Classifying Land Uses .................................................................................................................... 11Effects of Land Use on Runoff Quantity ................................................................................ 12Effects of Land Use on Water Quality ..................................................................................... 13Effects of Land Use on Habitat .................................................................................................. 13

Riparian Zones ............................................................................................................................... 13

CHAPTER 3. BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN STREAMS ............................................................... 15

Food Chains and Webs .................................................................................................................. 15Stream Invertebrates ...................................................................................................................... 17Using Invertebrates to Assess Stream Quality ...................................................................... 18

CHAPTER 4. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAMS ............................................................. 21

Temperature ...................................................................................................................................... 21Turbidity ............................................................................................................................................. 21Stream Order ..................................................................................................................................... 22Rates of Flow ..................................................................................................................................... 23

Streamflow Changes over Time................................................................................................. 23Impact of Impervious Surfaces .................................................................................................. 24

CHAPTER 5. STREAM CHEMISTRY ....................................................................................................... 27

Dissolved Oxygen ............................................................................................................................ 28Effect of Turbulence on Oxygen ............................................................................................... 28Effect of Temperature on Oxygen ............................................................................................. 29Effects of Living Things on Oxygen ......................................................................................... 30Effects of Organic Pollution on Oxygen ................................................................................. 30

pH .......................................................................................................................................................... 31Alkalinity ............................................................................................................................................ 34Phosphorus ......................................................................................................................................... 34

The Phosphorus Cycle .................................................................................................................. 34

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 4: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

vi

Effects of Excess Phosphate ........................................................................................................ 35Nitrogen .............................................................................................................................................. 36

The Nitrogen Cycle ...................................................................................................................... 36Effects of Excess Nitrate ............................................................................................................. 38

Chloride ............................................................................................................................................... 39

CHAPTER 6. MODELING AND MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 41

Scientific Models .............................................................................................................................. 41Using Models to Evaluate Management Options ................................................................. 43A Case Study: Managing New York City’s Water Supply ................................................ 44Community Action: Making a Difference in Your Own Watershed ............................ 45

SECTION 2. PROTOCOLS: INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH

OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 49

Protocols .............................................................................................................................................. 49Protocol 1 – Watershed Field Survey ....................................................................................... 51Protocol 2 – Object Recognition Using Maps and Airphotos .......................................... 54Protocol 3 – Delineating a Watershed ..................................................................................... 57Protocol 4 – Analyzing Stream Integrity Using Remote Sensing Data ....................... 62Protocol 5 – Collecting Aquatic Invertebrates ...................................................................... 78Protocol 6 – Simplified Stream Biota Test (SSBT) .............................................................. 85Protocol 7 – Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Using Aquatic Invertebrates .................. 87Protocol 8 – Measuring Stream Discharge ............................................................................. 92Protocol 9 – Aquatic Chemistry ................................................................................................. 98Protocol 10 – Computer Modeling with STELLA ............................................................ 106

WORKSHEETS FOR PLANNING PROTOCOLS ................................................................................. 130

Protocol Planning Form .............................................................................................................. 130Data Analysis Peer Review Form ............................................................................................ 132

SECTION 3. INTERACTIVE RESEARCH: FIELD STUDIES AND

EXPERIMENTS

IDEAS FOR WATERSHED DYNAMICS RESEARCH .......................................................................... 135

Watershed Surveys ........................................................................................................................ 136Land use ........................................................................................................................................ 136WHEBIP ....................................................................................................................................... 136Invasive Species ........................................................................................................................... 136

Stream Assessment with Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ..................................................... 137Comparing Assessment Protocols ............................................................................................ 137Effects of Land Use by People ................................................................................................. 137Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology .................................................................................................. 138

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 5: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

vii

Flow .................................................................................................................................................... 138Precipitation and Impervious Surfaces .................................................................................. 138Snowmelt ....................................................................................................................................... 139Invertebrates ................................................................................................................................. 139Online Flow Data ....................................................................................................................... 139

Stream Chemistry .......................................................................................................................... 139Point and Non-point Sources ................................................................................................... 139Nutrient Load .............................................................................................................................. 140Dissolved Oxygen ........................................................................................................................ 140

Modeling ........................................................................................................................................... 140Online Resources and Long-Term Data ................................................................................ 141

FORMS FOR INTERACTIVE RESEARCH ............................................................................................. 143

Planning Research ......................................................................................................................... 144Choosing a Research Topic ....................................................................................................... 144Interactive Research Planning Form 1 .................................................................................. 147Interactive Research Planning Form 2 .................................................................................. 149

Presenting Research Results ...................................................................................................... 154Research Report Form ............................................................................................................... 154Poster Guidelines ........................................................................................................................ 157

Peer Review Forms ....................................................................................................................... 158Experimental Design Peer Review Form ............................................................................. 158Research Report Peer Review Form ...................................................................................... 159Poster Peer Review Form ......................................................................................................... 160

SECTION 4. INTERACTIVE RESEARCH: STORMWATER

TREATMENT DESIGN CHALLENGE

STORMWATER TREATMENT DESIGN CHALLENGE ........................................................................ 163

Materials ............................................................................................................................................ 163Setting the Scene .............................................................................................................................. 163Background ........................................................................................................................................ 164The Challenge ................................................................................................................................... 164Design Criteria and Constraints .................................................................................................. 164The Design Process .......................................................................................................................... 166

FORMS FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT DESIGN CHALLENGE ................................................ 169

Parts List and Cost Analysis Worksheet ..................................................................................... 170Design Selection Matrix ................................................................................................................. 171Design Proposal Form .................................................................................................................... 172Team Questions ................................................................................................................................ 173Presentation Assessment Form ...................................................................................................... 174

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 6: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

viii

F I G U R E S A N D T A B L E S

I N T H E S T U D E N T E D I T I O N

F I G U R E S

SECTION 111.1. The Mississippi River watershed is made up of many smaller sub-watersheds.11.2. Water cycles between land, water, and the atmosphere.11.3. The impervious surfaces in cities create more surface runoff than in suburbs

or forests and allow less water to percolate into the ground.11.4. Food webs combine food chains into complex networks of feeding relationships.11.5. Complete metamorphosis includes a pupal stage.11.6. Incomplete metamorphosis has no pupal stage.11.7. Stream order classification system.11.8. A hydrograph shows changes in streamflow following a heavy rainstorm.11.9. Increase in impervious surface in a watershed causes increased surface runoff

and decreased percolation of water into the ground.1.10. Streamflows following storms rise more quickly and reach higher peaks in

urban areas than in forested watersheds.1.11. Cold water can hold more dissolved oxygen than warm water.1.12. Through photosynthesis, green plants create organic matter and release oxygen.1.13. Some types of aquatic life are more sensitive than others to acidic conditions.1.14. Nitrogen undergoes chemical changes as it cycles between land, water, air,

and living things.1.15. Simple models of a water molecule illustrate bonds between hydrogen and

oxygen atoms.

SECTION 212.1. Example airphoto12.2. Example watershed delineation.12.3. Technicians enter the stream.12.4. Cross section of stream.12.5. Example line graph.12.6. Example bar graph.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 7: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

ix

12.7. Dissolved oxygen nomograph.12.8. Physical model.12.9. Navigation arrow.2.10. Stock icon.2.11. Unnamed stock.2.12. Dynamite tool.2.13. Flow icon.2.14. Flow from bucket.2.15. Toggle icon.2.16. Graph tool.2.17. Flows in and out.2.18. Scale arrow.2.19. Connector tool.2.20. Leak connector.2.21. Slider tool.2.22. Blank slider control.2.23. Flow in slider control.2.24. Converter tool.2.25. Leak factor converter.2.26. A watershed landscape.

T A B L E S

SECTION 111.1. Distribution of fresh water on Earth.11.2. Typical water use in American homes.11.3. Relationship between pH, acidity, and H+ concentration.

SECTION 212.1. Example uses of watershed protocols.12.2. Field survey observation data.12.3. Qualitative interpretation of watershed airphotos.12.4. WHEBIP categories and subscores.12.5. Simplified land use code descriptions.12.6. Land use in our watershed.12.7. WHEBIP subscore totals.12.8. Stream integrity rating.12.9. Simplified stream biota test (SSBT).2.10. Aquatic invertebrate tally.2.11. Species richness subscore.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 8: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

x

2.12. Dominance index subscore.2.13. Indicator species.2.14. Index of biotic integrity and water quality.2.15. Downstream chemistry data.2.16. Upstream chemistry data.2.17. Chemical measurements.2.18. Model stream flow.

SECTION 33.1. Potential research questions.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 9: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION xi

PREFACE

WHY S TUDY WATERSHED DYNAMICS?Water is an important issue for every community, whether that communityis a bustling urban neighborhood crowded with people, or a pristine marshcrowded with ducks, amphibians, and fish.

The water resource concerns of human communities vary greatly. In someregions, fresh water for drinking and similar uses is in very short supply.The conservation of water, the identification of new sources of water, andthe protection of drinking water reserves are high on the policy agenda insuch places. In other regions, water is too abundant, and flooding after largestorms is inconvenient and expensive at best, deadly at worst. In still otherplaces, water supplies may be contaminated by improper chemical disposal,or may serve as battlegrounds pitting farmers against recreational river run-ners, or developers against environmental activists. There are few placeswhere water is not an important issue. The details may vary, but everyoneneeds enough—but not too much—clean, fresh water. Natural communi-ties also need enough, but not too much, clean, fresh water. Such communi-ties include the plants and animal assemblages living in lakes, rivers, ponds,and streams; less obviously, they include terrestrial communities. Many in-sect species and most amphibians, for example, spend a significant part oftheir lives underwater. As adults, they disperse widely, where they contrib-ute energy and ecological function. For example, they may eat other insects(dragonflies) or serve as food for birds (mayflies).

Public participation in water resource management requires public un-derstanding about how water functions in natural communities, and howhuman activities affect the distribution and quality of this precious resource.One challenge—a fascinating one—is that just as watersheds do not respectpolitical boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective requires under-standing biology, chemistry, Earth sciences, mathematics, sociology, econom-ics, politics … the list goes on and on. For that reason, the interdisciplinarystudy of watersheds is often considered an “advanced” topic. We believe,however, that if it is approached as a foundational topic, it can provide won-derful opportunities for original research—research that matters to commu-nities of all kinds.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 10: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION 1

UNDERSTANDINGWATERSHEDDYNAMICS

S E C T I O N 1

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 11: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 12: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION 3

C H A P T E R 1

INTRODUCTIONTO WATERSHEDDYNAMICS

The title of this book, Watershed Dynamics, refers to the idea that streams,rivers, lakes, and other water bodies are dynamic systems, continuously chang-ing in many ways—physically, chemically, and biologically. Have you everwondered why some streams dry up during the summer while others con-tinue to flow? Or where the water in a river comes from when the weatherhas been dry for several months? Have you wondered what sorts of organ-isms live in water, and why different varieties live in ponds vs. streams? Orhow the fish and invertebrates you find in a stream during periods of lowflow could possibly have survived the muddy, raging currents during springrunoff?

These are examples of the dynamic relationships that take place in waterand the surrounding landscape. Every body of water interacts with the at-mosphere, receiving precipitation and exchanging gases between water andair. Every water body also interacts with the surrounding landscape, receiv-ing runoff along with sediments and dissolved materials that get carried alongduring rainfall or snowmelt events. Humans of course are an integral part ofthese dynamic systems, both affecting and being affected by water in all as-pects of our lives.

When you turn on a kitchen faucet in New Orleans, Louisiana, some ofthe water that comes out has already been through several sets of humankidneys. The reason: New Orleans draws its drinking water from the Mis-sissippi River, which extends 2350 miles upstream and gets used in manyways before making its way south to New Orleans. The river begins withrainfall and snowmelt draining into Lake Itasca, Minnesota. As it works itsway downstream from Minnesota to Louisiana, Mississippi River water isused for drinking, bathing, washing, agriculture, and industry in over 70communities along the way. In each city or town, some water drains directly

TTTTTopicopicopicopicopic: watershedGo tGo tGo tGo tGo tooooo: www.sciLINKS.orgCodeCodeCodeCodeCode: WD01

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 13: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

S E C T I O N 1. U N D E R S T A N D I N G W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

4 N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E T E A C H E R S A S S O C I A T I O N

back into the river after use, but much is routed through wastewater treat-ment plants. There, excess organic matter and other contaminants areremoved before the water returns to the river and continues its journeydownstream.

It may seem distasteful to think of drinking water that has been “treated”by kidneys and sewage treatment plants. Perhaps you’d rather drink “pure”water—say, the water melting from a 10,000-year old glacier or a prehis-toric, deep underground aquifer. Unless you live in a very unusual place, thisprobably isn’t possible. The water that we all drink has been recycled throughnatural processes, human-engineered systems, or both. All of our water,whether it comes from a reservoir, a well, or even a bottle, is affected by howpeople use the land through which that water once flowed.

Protection of water resources is vital but also complicated. People havewide-ranging interests and concerns about land use and water resources, andmanagement decisions are made based on combinations of science, politics,and values. For some people, the top priority is economic development, withthe goal of creating jobs and encouraging commercial, industrial, and resi-dential growth. In this case, abundant, inexpensive water is a high priority.Other people focus on preserving wild spaces and natural ecosystems, or pro-tecting the purity of drinking water. These people are likely to want to re-strict rather than promote construction of new development projects. Thegoal of watershed management is to balance multiple, competing demands,using scientific studies in combination with human judgment to make deci-sions about various watershed management options.

WHAT IS A WATERSHED?A watershed is the region of land that contributes water to a stream, river, pond,lake, or other body of water. The boundary around a watershed is called thewatershed divide. This is the line that divides one watershed from the next.Rain that falls on one side of the divide will drain into a stream in one water-shed, and rain falling on the other side will drain into a different watershed.

One way to think of a watershed is to imagine a bowl. The body of wa-ter—such as a pond—is at the bottom of the bowl. The sides of the bowlrepresent the land draining into the pond, and the top edge is the divide thatdefines the boundaries of the pond’s watershed. Of course, actual watershedsare not circular. Instead, they have irregular boundaries that follow the to-pography of the land. Using Protocol 3 (p. 57), you will learn how to delin-eate watershed boundaries by connecting the points of highest elevation inthe land surrounding a stream or other water body.

Every land area, regardless of its location, is part of a watershed. As youmight imagine, watersheds vary widely. Some are hilly and others are rela-tively flat. Some are forested and others contain cities. Some cover vastareas of land, and others are much smaller. The headwaters of a small streamnear the top of a mountain may have a watershed the size of several foot-ball fields.

A watershed is theregion of land drain-ing into a stream,river, pond, lake, orother body of water.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 14: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

C H A P T E R 1. I N T R O D U C T I O N T O W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION 5

No two watersheds are exactly alike. The boundaries and characteristicsof a watershed depend on many factors, including the geology of the region.What type of bedrock lies under the soils? Is the terrain steep and hilly, orbroad and flat? Are there volcanoes in the area? Have glaciers covered theland in the distant past, leaving behind vast deposits of sand and gravel?

Climate also plays a major role in defining watershed characteristics. Howmuch precipitation occurs per year? Does it occur primarily during a fewwet months, or is it evenly distributed throughout the year? How warm arethe summers, and how extreme are the winters? How strong are the winds?What types of vegetation are able to survive?

Vegetation is another key characteristic of watersheds. Because roots ab-sorb water and anchor soil, the types of plants growing in a watershed deter-mine how much—and how quickly—water runs off after storms or springsnowmelt. The vegetation in a watershed also affects the types of habitatavailable for animals and other organisms.

In contrast, the watershed of the Mississippi River covers about 40 percentof the lower 48 states! Of course, the Mississippi River is supplied by thousandsof tributary streams and rivers, each of which has its own watershed. Whenconsidering huge watersheds such as that of the Mississippi River, the numer-ous smaller watersheds within it are called sub-watersheds (see Figure 1.1).

F I G U R E 1.1.The Mississippi River watershed is made up of manysmaller sub-watersheds.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 15: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

S E C T I O N 1. U N D E R S T A N D I N G W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

6 N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E T E A C H E R S A S S O C I A T I O N

THE WATER CYCLEOn Earth, water shifts continuously between gaseous, liquid, and solidforms—between water vapor in the atmosphere and rain or other forms ofprecipitation falling on land or into the sea (Figure 1.2). When precipitationfalls onto land, it can return to the atmosphere, percolate into the soil, or runoff into surface water bodies such as streams, rivers, lakes, or wetlands. Wa-ter flows downhill through watersheds, emptying into larger bodies of waterand eventually into an ocean. At all stages along the way, water vapor re-turns to the atmosphere through evaporation from land and water surfaces.

F I G U R E 1. 2 .Water cycles between land, water, and the atmosphere.

PERCOLATION

to

Groundwater

PRECIPITATION

EVAPORATIONand

TRANSPIRATION

SURFACE RUNOFF

Some of the water that soaks into the ground percolates downward to be-come groundwater. Groundwater trickles in a general downhill directionthrough layers of crushed rock, gravel, soil, or other permeable material.Depending on factors such as soil type, geologic conditions, and precipita-tion patterns, the velocity of groundwater flow can range from several metersper day to only a few meters over the course of an entire year. Groundwateris the source of water for wells and springs, and it also slowly feeds intolakes, streams, and rivers. During periods with no rainfall, streams that re-ceive groundwater are less likely to dry up than those fed solely throughsurface runoff.

TTTTTopicopicopicopicopic: water cycleGo tGo tGo tGo tGo tooooo: www.sciLINKS.orgCodeCodeCodeCodeCode: WD02

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 16: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

C H A P T E R 1. I N T R O D U C T I O N T O W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION 7

Transpiration is theprocess throughwhich plants releasewater to theatmosphere.

Not all of the water that soaks into the ground becomes groundwater.Plants take up the water they need to sustain life. Through a process calledtranspiration, plants release water vapor back into the atmosphere. Graduallyclouds form and grow, and the water cycle continues as precipitation onceagain falls to the Earth.

Of all the water on Earth, 97 percent is in the oceans and only 3 percent isfresh water. Of the fresh water, less than one percent is found in lakes, rivers,and other surface water bodies. Most fresh water is stored in ice caps and gla-ciers, or underground in the form of groundwater (Table 1.1). Nevertheless,the tiny fraction of the Earth’s water that actively circulates as fresh water playsan incredibly important and dynamic role in life on Earth, sustaining humanlife and the lives of all other land-dwelling and fresh-water species.

TA B L E 1.1Distribution of Fresh Water on Ear th

Although wetlands contain only a tiny fraction of the fresh water on Earth,they represent an important component of the water cycle. Marshes, swamps,bogs, and other wetlands are heavily vegetated areas that are saturated withwater for at least part of the year. They cover approximately 6 percent of theEarth’s surface, ranging from tropical mangrove swamps in Panama to peatbogs in the United Kingdom.

Wetlands play vital roles in physical, chemical, and biological processesin the Earth’s water cycle. Physically, wetlands help to reduce flooding bystoring great volumes of water, slowly releasing it to downstream waters inthe weeks and months after each storm. Because wetlands release water slowlyover time, they help to maintain flow in streams and rivers during dry peri-ods of the year. Wetlands also help to purify the water that flows throughthem. Sediments settle out and some dissolved pollutants get broken downor taken up by plants as water trickles slowly through wetlands. And finally,wetlands provide a rich variety of habitats that support a diverse system ofliving things. Migrating birds take advantage of the abundant food suppliesthey find in wetlands, as do many other forms of wildlife.

% of Fresh Water Source Water on Earth

Ice caps, glaciers, permanent snow, and permafrost 69.6%

Groundwater 30.1%

Lakes, rivers, wetlands, and other surface water 0.30%

Soil moisture 0.05%

Atmosphere 0.04%

Source: Gleick, P. H., 1996: Water resources. In Encyclopedia of climate and weather, ed. by S. H.Schneider, New York: Oxford University Press, (2) 817–23.

TTTTTopicopicopicopicopic: properties of waterGo tGo tGo tGo tGo tooooo: www.sciLINKS.orgCodeCodeCodeCodeCode: WD03

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 17: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

S E C T I O N 1. U N D E R S T A N D I N G W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

8 N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E T E A C H E R S A S S O C I A T I O N

TA B L E 1. 2Typical Water Use in American Homes

Type of Use Typical Water Use

Tap water (hand washing, toothbrushing, etc.) up to 5 liters per minute

Dripping faucet up to 55 liters per day

Toilet (installed before 1992) 14 liters per flush

Toilet (low-flow) 6 liters per flush

Shower 8–20 liters per minute

Bath 100–200 liters per bath

Clothes washer 90–150 liters per load

Dishwasher 20–60 liters per load

Lawn watering 20–40 liters per minute

Source: www.h2ouse.org, developed by the California Urban Water Conservation Council.

COMPETING NEEDS FOR WATERAlthough the Earth contains vast amounts of water, supplies are not alwayssufficient in any particular location to meet the needs of various competinguses. Humans use water to irrigate crops, generate power, and support awide range of industrial, commercial, and agricultural applications. We alsorely on it for recreational activities such as fishing, boating, and swimming.

In our homes, each of us uses an average of 300 to 400 liters of water perday for household uses (Table 1.2). This doesn’t include all the water it takesto produce the food we eat and the products we use. For example, a cowdrinks roughly four liters of water for each liter of milk produced. To manu-facture a new car requires over 8,500 liters of water, much of which is used inmaking the tires.

Competing with all of these water uses is our desire to protect habitats fora wide range of aquatic organisms. We choose to protect some species becauseof their value for human uses such as sport fishing. Others are targeted forprotection because they are endangered or are particularly important in main-taining healthy ecosystems. To help meet critical habitat needs, many stateshave passed legislation specifying minimum allowable flow rates in designatedrivers or streams. In some cases this means that water must be released from areservoir to maintain downstream flows during dry seasons. In other cases,irrigation or other uses might need to be reduced in order to maintain criticallevels of flow needed for survival of fish and other aquatic organisms.

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Page 18: STUDENT EDITION Watershed Dynamics · 2018. 5. 9. · political boundaries, watershed science does not respect disciplinary bound-aries. Understanding watersheds from a policy perspective

C H A P T E R 1. I N T R O D U C T I O N T O W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S

W AT E R S H E D D Y N A M I C S : S TUDENT EDITION 9

Water policies often are controversial because they deal with conflictingneeds and values. Which is more important—irrigating crops or providinghigh flows for recreational uses such as whitewater rafting? Which shouldtake precedence—providing water for new residential development, or main-taining critical flows needed to preserve a valued wetland? Issues such asthese are particularly difficult because the times when water is in shortestsupply also are the times of greatest need for habitat protection as well as forresidential, commercial, and industrial water uses.

DISCUSSION QUES TIONSw What would you say if someone told you that you were drinking recycled

water that had already passed through several wastewater treatment sys-tems?

w What is the source of water for your school or home? Does it come fromsurface or groundwater? Do you know the name of the watershed youlive in?

w Historically, wetlands have often been considered “wasted” land that canbe drained, filled, and used as “new” land for development and construc-tion. What are some possible ecological consequences of this type of de-velopment strategy?

w Consider the water use data in Table 1.2. If your community were expe-riencing a water shortage, what water use restrictions would be most worthexploring, and why?

TTTTTopicopicopicopicopic: groundwatercontaminantsGo tGo tGo tGo tGo tooooo: www.sciLINKS.orgCodeCodeCodeCodeCode: WD04

Copyright © 2004 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.