View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
These are the minutes for the student council meeting which took place on the 25 May 2011
Citation preview
UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD STUDENTS’ UNION
STUDENT COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY 25 MAY 2011
MINUTES
COUNCILLORS PRESENT: Daniel Walton, Stephen Mann, David Heaton, John Hart, Liam McLoughlin,
Chetan Mali, Kevin Rowswell, Tom Hughes Roberts, Mosami Sayare, Dilip Das, Harriet Phipps, Katie
Taylor, Robert Barr, Donna Woolley, Sebastian Pal, Matthew Metcalfe, Heather Sharp.
IN ATTENDANCE: Ricky Chotai (President), Caroline Dangerfield (Vice President), Maros Kravec (Vice
President), Jim Dale (Vice President), Christabel Brown (Vice President), Sophie Atkinson (Vice President
elect), Phil Benton (Chief Executive), Rhiannon Cruse (Student Engagement Manager), Marco Galea, Ray
Eckersley.
1. Received: Apologies for absence from Councillors Reetu Zarora, Joe Woods and Holly Brunt.
2. Received: Resignation from Christine Merry.
3. The Chair accepted a request to move paper SC11/10 ‘Peel Hall issue’ to earlier in the agenda, to
enable the student presenting the paper to attend an examination.
4. Received: Paper SC11/10 ‘Peel Hall’ issue, presented by Marco Galea, a student from the school of
Music, Media and Performance. The paper outlined issues regarding the use of Peel Hall as a lecture
theatre for the academic year 2011/12 whilst the Chapman lecture theatres are being refurbished. The
student asked the Union to request that the University stop its plans to use Peel Hall as a lecture space.
Sabbatical Officers have already been involved in meetings about temporary lecture spaces and in
discussion it was noted that because of the Chapman building refurbishment, various alternatives are
due to be used for lecture space, including Peel Hall and Maxwell. Semi-permanent desks were
considered more appropriate than lap trays for these alternative venues. It was further noted that
alternative performance spaces have been arranged for MMP students in the local area, as well as at
the University’s new facilities at Media City. Peel Hall is also due to undergo significant improvements
following its use as a lecture space. The Sabbatical Officers expressed the view that while this is not an
ideal situation, it is a short term issue which will result in long term benefits for all students. Marco
Galea commented that communication from the University had been poor, and that many affected
students were not aware of plans. Resolved: While it is not possible to prevent Peel Hall being used as
a temporary lecture space for next academic year, Council asked the Sabbatical Officers to lobby for
improved communication between the staff and students affected.
5. The election for a Council Chair was conducted using the Alternative Vote system. In the first round of
votes, Kevin Rowswell was duly elected and took the place of Chair for the remainder of the meeting.
a. In discussion and following a suggestion by Council, the post of ‘Vice Chair’ was offered and
accepted by the Councillor coming second in the election for Chair, Stephen Mann.
6. Received: ‘Student Officer Reports’ (SC11/01), ‘Trustee Board Report’ (SC11/02), ‘University
Committees Report’ (SC11/03) and ‘NUS Report’ (SC11/04).
a. The Chair commented that the content of the Committees Report had been decided by the
Sabbatical Officers and asked that Council be given an opportunity to decide whether future
issues are of student interest. The President commented that while this may be possible in
some cases, the Sabbatical Officers are bound by confidentiality, meaning that some issues
discussed at University Committees cannot be shared with Council.
7. Considered: A paper entitled ‘The Salford Bill of Student Rights: Feedback time’ presented by Vice
President Arts, Media and Social Science (SC11/05). asking Council, in the light of feedback and
criticism from academics, to decide whether to keep the Bill’s proposed feedback time limit of three
weeks, or alter the Bill to bring it in line with the University policy of four weeks.
In discussion, the evidence base for the Bill of Rights was questioned, and suggestions were made that
further research could be done to determine the current state of feedback times across the University.
The Vice President Health & Social Care explained that NSS data had been used throughout the Bill of
Rights, and that although further research had not been done, the extremely low scoring for ‘feedback
and assessment’ in the NSS sufficiently demonstrates the problem.
The Chair suggested that Council take a vote on the Sabbatical Officers original request, but included
an alternative option of recommending further research. The Chief Executive alerted the chair to the
fact that the Sabbatical Officers’ request was for a decision between two options, and that a vote for a
third option would be detrimental to the political power of the Bill of Rights. The Chair gave Council
three options and conducted the vote.
Resolved: To retain the three week feedback limit demand.
8. Considered: A paper entitled ‘The Salford Student Charter’ presented by the President (SC11/06). The
paper explained the University’s plans to create a student charter which would outline the rights and
responsibilities of the University and students, and included a draft charter. The University’s charter is
due to be completed by September 2011. The Sabbatical Officers asked Councillors to give feedback
on the draft charter and make suggestions or recommendations. During discussion it was noted that a
key difference between the Union’s Bill of Rights and the University’s charter is that the charter will be
concerned with responsibilities, while the Bill of Rights highlights problems or gaps in quality and is
written predominantly for students. The Bill of Rights will continue to be the Union’s campaign
document. Councillors discussed that differences between Schools will make an institution-wide
charter difficult, but there was general agreement that the draft charter was a good model document.
Resolved: The Vice President Health & Social Care will update Council on the progress of the charter.
9. Considered: A paper entitled ‘University Restructure’ presented by the President (SC11/07). The
paper outlined the University’s restructuring plans and the potential impact on students, particularly with
regard to School mergers. During discussion, it was noted that Schools have agreed longer office
hours in order to ensure that students are not disadvantaged by the mergers. The Vice President
Business, Law & Languages stated that an email update would be sent to reps in the affected schools
this week. On behalf of Council, the Chair thanked the Sabbatical Officers for their work on this issue
so far. Resolved: To mandate the new Sabbatical Team to make this a priority campaign issue for the
next academic year.
10. Considered: A paper entitled ‘LGBT issues’ presented by K. Taylor and H. Phipps (SC11/08). The
paper outlined a number of campaign issues currently being dealt with by the LGBT society. The first
issue ‘gender neutral toilets’ was described as the priority campaign. During discussion it was noted
that this issue is backed by the NUS LGBT campaign, and that to introduce the concept to University
House would not require significant changes to the building, but merely the changing of the door signs.
The use of disabled access toilets was suggested, but strongly challenged by Council members who felt
that these facilities should be kept as designated disabled toilets.
The President commented that because the Students’ Union does not own University House, it is not
immediately possible to implement this change, and that more consultation must be done to ensure that
other minority groups are not negatively affected. The example of Muslim students who would be
uncomfortable with mixed facilities was given. The President added that while the Union is affiliated to
NUS, it is not bound by its policies or campaigns, and must act in the best interest of its members at
Salford.
When asked whether they wished to mandate the Officers to dedicate resource to this issue, KT and
HP stated that this was not necessary as the LGBT society would be campaigning on the issue, and
they would like to report back on progress to Council.
11. Considered: A paper entitled ‘Halls issues’ presented by Stephen Mann (SC11/09). The paper outlined
the view that students living in halls are underrepresented and face specific issues like cleaning
charges. During discussion it was noted that a University email introducing the cleaning charges
suggested the Union had been complicit in the decision. The President and the Vice President Health
& Social Care assured Council that this was not the case, and that the University often inaccurately
exaggerated Union support for unpopular decisions. Councillors discussed the potential for a forum or
system of reps within halls, and it was noted that forums of this kind had been tried before, and fairly
recently by Student Life with no success.
Resolved: To use the Better University forum to explore this issue further.
Next meeting date to be arranged when timetables are released.
Close of meeting