23
Structure Considerations D. Schulte

Structure Considerations

  • Upload
    feoras

  • View
    22

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Structure Considerations. D. Schulte. Luminosity and Parameter Drivers. Luminosity spectrum. Beam Quality (+bunch length). Beam current. Approximate Parameter Derivation. Not how we chose parameters but how parameters are driven by physics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Structure Considerations

Structure Considerations

D. Schulte

Page 2: Structure Considerations

2

Luminosity and Parameter Drivers

Beam Quality(+bunch length)

D. Schulte

Luminosityspectrum Beam current

Page 3: Structure Considerations

3

Approximate Parameter Derivation

Damping ring and BDS define minimum horizontal beam size at IP

D. Schulte

Not how we chose parameters but how parameters are driven by physics

Beam-beam effects define minimum charge to have full luminosity efficiency

Luminosity efficiency requires structure aperture consistent with minimum charge

Need to maximise RF to beam efficiency and all parameters follow

Page 4: Structure Considerations

Long-range Wakefields

• Once bunch charge is fixed main efficiency/current limitation comes from multi-bunch wakefields– Need to ensure stability of jittering beam

• Different criteria– Coherent jitter of the full train

• Expressed by FC

• very likely– Independent jitter of each bunch

• Expressed by FRMS

• Possible– Worst initial pattern

• Expressed by Fworst

• Hopefully not likely

Page 5: Structure Considerations

Theoretical Model

r x f = Ar x 0The final position of the bunches can be expressed as a function of the initial offset

Each complex component of the vectors represents one bunch

Aij depend on the wakefieldsWith no wakefields A=1

Luminosity loss ΔL is proportional to

ΔL∝r x fr x f*

F gives the increase in luminosity due to long-range wakefields compared to the casewith no long-range wakefield

Page 6: Structure Considerations

Example: CLIC_G

FRMS for kick only on the second bunch

Page 7: Structure Considerations

Remark: Static ErrorsStatic errors of the main linac structures (scatters) are not very important

Page 8: Structure Considerations

Additional Trapped ModeThe importance of a trapped mode depends very much on the frequency

Page 9: Structure Considerations

Example: Undamped ModeA mode with 88V/pCm-2 can yield an increase of FRMS by 20%

Page 10: Structure Considerations

Steps• Need wakefield in time domain or with a

limited number of modes• Can perform theoretical analysis rapidly• Full simulation will take longer– Are expected to show better stability due to de-

phasing in individual bunches– Do not want to rely on this

Page 11: Structure Considerations

First Result• Wakefields at different bunches from Alessandro• Point-like calculation done– FC=O(1012), FRMS=O(1010), Fworst=O(1013)

• Will need to improve the structure– Long long-range wakefield by O(0.1)

• But only envelope given– Change sign of every other kick and things look much

better• Need a real wakefield• Need uncertainty estimates

Page 12: Structure Considerations
Page 13: Structure Considerations
Page 14: Structure Considerations
Page 15: Structure Considerations
Page 16: Structure Considerations
Page 17: Structure Considerations
Page 18: Structure Considerations
Page 19: Structure Considerations
Page 20: Structure Considerations
Page 21: Structure Considerations
Page 22: Structure Considerations
Page 23: Structure Considerations