24
Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components Xinjian Duan , Michael J. Kozluk Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

Xinjian Duan, Michael J. KozlukAtomic Energy of Canada Limited

Page 2: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

2

Outline• Observed Degradations

– Steam Generator Tubing– Feeder Piping

• Fitness-for-Service Guidelines• Structural Integrity Assessments

– Material Characterizations– Steam Generator Tube Testing Project (SGTTP)– Feeder Bend Testing Project (FBTP)– Advanced Finite Element Analysis

• Conclusions

Page 3: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

3

Piping in CANDU ® Reactor

Feeder Piping

Steam Generator

Fuel Channel

Header

Page 4: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

4

Steam Generators in CANDU

M400 I600 I600 I800 I8000.5-inch 5/8-inch

Page 5: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

5

Degradations in Pickering A S.G.

Page 6: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

6

Degradations of Monel 400 SG Tubes

Inter Granular Attack Pitting Inner Diameter Lap

Cracking Wall Thinning

Page 7: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

7

Degradations in Feeder Piping

Local Wall Thinning Cracking

Page 8: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

8

Fitness-for-Service Guidelinesfor Steam Generator and Feeder

• Inspection• Condition Monitoring Assessment

– Current and backward looking• Operational Assessment

– Forward looking• Assessment of inspected and uninspected components• Leak-Before-Break

– Must be demonstrated whenever through-wall penetration is credible

– operational leakage– consequential leakage

Page 9: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

9

Steam Generator Tube Testing Project(SGTTP)• Initiated in 1999 by OPG• Three Materials

– Monel 400– Inconel 600– Incoloy 800

• Four Types of Tests– Burst-Pressure Test– Pressurized-Bending Test– Leak-Rate Test– Materials Characterization

Page 10: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

10

Some SGTTP Testing Results

Fret Scar 360o Uniform Thinning (Wastage)

EDM Axial Slot (Crack-Like Flaw) Defect-Free Ex-Service Tube

Page 11: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

11

Feeder Bend Testing Project (FBTP)• Initiated in 2002 by CANDU Owners Group (COG)• SA-106 Gr. B carbon steel• Phase 1 (2003-2005)

Through-wall axial crack at the intrados/cheek of feeder bend• Phase 2 (2005-2007)

Through-wall axial crack at the extrados of feeder bend• Phase 3 (2007-2009)

Local wall thinning downstream of welds• Utilities sponsored tests of ex-service components

Feeder bend with surface cracksFeeder elbow with local wall thinning

Page 12: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

12

Material Characterizations• Tensile Properties

Temperature: -196°C - 400 °CStrain rate: 0.0001s-1 - 10 s-1

• Fracture Toughness-196°C to 310°C

• Micro Hardness

Large database since 1970sLocations: Straight pipe, Extrados, CheeksMaterials: Archive, Ex-service

Page 13: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

13

Tests in 1980s

Before Test

After Test• 310°C• Combined loading• As fabricated bend• No flaw• Interrupted to check crack initiation

Page 14: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

14

FBTP – Phase 2 Extrados Crack

• 265°C• Through-Wall Axial Crack• High Temperature Liner• Thinned Bend• Quasi-Static Loading• Pressure & Bending Moment• Ductile Shear Failure

Page 15: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

15

Mode of Failure

Full ductile mode of failure

Page 16: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

16

Unique Feature of Thin Wall Piping

Substantial plastic deformation ahead of crack tip

Page 17: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

17

Predictions versus MeasurementsFeeder Bend Testing Project – Phase 2

0

10 MPa

20 MPa

30 MPa

40 MPa

50 MPa

0 MPa 10 MPa 20 MPa 30 MPa 40 MPa 50 MPaPredicted Failure Pressure

Mea

sure

d Fa

ilure

Pre

ssur

e

extrados - pressure only extrados - pressure & bending intrados - pressure only intrados - pressure & bending correlation line

Simple Folias model gives good predictions.

Page 18: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

18

Test of Ex-Service Feederwith Surface Cracks

4

1

2

5

3

73%tw90oC

Page 19: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

19

Tests of Ex-Service Feederwith Blunt Flaw

•Minimum wall thickness 3.0 mm•Full ductile mode of failure•90°C

Page 20: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

20

Heterogeneous Finite Element ModelOutside Surface

Safety Factor:1.3 � FFSG3.0 � HFEM

Crack-tip

Page 21: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

21

Conclusions• Tests of ex-service components provide strong support for the safe operation of ageing reactors.

• Both SGTTP and FBTP test results indicate that the fracture mechanics is not appropriate for the thin wall small diameter components.

• Advanced finite element model has been developed and proved to be useful for the failure analysis.

Page 22: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

22

Acknowledgements• CANDU Owners Group (COG)

– Feeder Integrity Joint Project (FIJP)– Chemistry Materials & Components (CM&C)

• Ontario Power Generation• New Brunswick Power Nuclear

Page 23: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

23

Recent Publications• Xinjian Duan, Michael J. Kozluk, Tracy Gendron, John Slade, “Alternative Methodology for Assessing Part-Through-Wall Cracks in Carbon Steel Bends Removed from Point Lepreau Generating Station”, SMiRT19, Paper Number 1318, August 12-17, 2007, Toronto, Canada.

• Xinjian Duan, Mukesh Jain, Don R. Metzger and David S. Wilkinson, “A unified finite element model for the prediction of failure behaviour for sheet material”, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2007 November.

• Xinjian Duan, Arnaud Weck, D. S. Wilkinson and D. R. Metzger, “Plastic Limit Analysis of Perforated Material under Finite Deformation”, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2008 May.

• Xinjian Duan, Michael J. Kozluk, Sandra Pagan, Brian Mills, “Structural Integrity Assessment of steam generator tube by the use of heterogeneous finite element method”, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2008 November.

Page 24: Structural Integrity Assessments of Class 1 CANDU Components

24

Questions?