Upload
berenice-west
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strengthening Protection for all Ages
Dee Masters BL
27 August 2015
Case for change
Objectives
• Comparable situations should be treated in the same way
• Hurdles = special treatment
• Objective justification
E.g. 20% of people under 24 are unemployed compared to 4% of 25 to 49 year olds
What is equality?
Overview of the proposed legislation
Structure broadly consistent with the principle of equality
BUT – limitations:
• Under 16’s are excluded
• Too many exceptions
• Some exceptions too broad
Definition of “age”
• “65 years old”, “over 65”, “pensioners”, “older people”, “the elderly”
• Perceived age
• Discrimination by association
Scope• Goods, facilities, services
• Charities
• Education
• Health and social care
• Public functions
• Selling, letting or managing premises unless purely private
Education
Types of discrimination• Direct
• Indirect
• Harassment
• Victimisation
• Discriminatory behaviour after a relationship has come to an end
• Advertisements which evince intention to discriminate
• Instructions / pressure to discriminate
Suitable exceptions• Positive action
• Charities
• Non-charities
• Existing legislation
• Age restricted products
• Competitive activities
• Ad hoc exceptions
Objective justification defence
• Legitimate aim
• Real need
• Proportionality
e.g. holiday company believes increased risk to damage where groups of people under 21 rent them
e.g. education provider receives a large donation for the purpose of improving reading in people under 18
Problematic exceptions
• Age-related holidays
• Residential park homes
• Home, family and private life
• Age-based concessions
• Financial services
Exclusion of U16’s
• United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child
• Exclusion contrary to equality
• S.75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998
• Illogical
• Evidence
• Normative effect
Special treatment of children and young people
• Maturity
• Economic independence
• Relative economic hardship
• Safety
• Special needs
Children need protection and not exclusion
Conclusion
Follow up