Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strategic Workforce Planning & Analytics During University Sector Change10th Universities HR Benchmarking Conference1 November 2013
Ephraim Spehrer-Patrick, Workforce Strategy & Planning LeaderPacific
Olivia Tsen, Principal, TalentLeadership & Organisational Performance
MERCER 1
Strategic Workforce Planning & Analytics During University Sector Change
1. University Sector Context
2. Strategic Workforce Planning
3. Workforce Analytics
4. Case Study: OECD
Q & A
Agenda
MERCER 2
Strategic Planning... ... requires managing contradictions
Universities today face a range of contradictions … and tough choices
Have talent surpluses in some areas… skill shortages in other areasand
Value and seek diversity and specialisation… benefit from a cohesive cultureand
Want efficient structures and processes…
place growing emphasis on innovation and leadershipand
Are constrained by remuneration frameworks… need to retain top talentand
Desire to increase use of technology solutions
compete with online education providersand
Need to provide clear vision and strategy…
are less certain about some future challenges and changesand
MERCER 3
Dynamics Potential workforce & organisation impacts
University SectorDrivers for more strategic workforce management
• Difficulty attracting • Highly mobile workforce
(Gen X, Y and Z)• Loss of talent to
professional practice
• Differentiating as an employer• Inspiring leadership needed to attract talent• Casualisation of workforce• Ability to attract research funding and best
and brightest staff and students
Global Competition for Talent
• Demand driven funding• Increased competition • Cost constraints• Restructuring faculties /
schools /departments
• Diversifying revenue streams• Retention and engagement• Greater accountability for results• Clearer performance standards• Change management
FundingPressures
• Skill shortages• Ageing populations
Demographic Shifts
• Global mobility and recruitment • Loss of specialist knowledge• Reputational risks• Online learning and teaching capability
• Skill shortages in specialist areas
• Ageing population• Technological
innovation
Demographic Shifts
MERCER 4November 4, 2013
Strategic Workforce Planning & Analytics: Mercer’s Point of View and Approach
MERCER 5
* According to research from Bersin & Associates, 2011: “developing advanced workforce planning capabilities”
Crucial process – helps HR leaders prioritise Science + Art
One of the least defined HR processes /disciplines
Ranked one of the highest priorities *
Analytics +Planning
Strategic Workforce Planning What is it?
MERCER 6
Strategic Workforce Planning What it is – and what it isn’t
Resource Allocation
Performance & Development
Process
Career Planning
StrategicWorkforcePlanning
Operational Strategic
Functionlevel
Individuallevel
It is
future-oriented
goes beyond the one-year horizon
focused on critical workforcesegments
MERCER 7
Workforce planning is a systematic process for identifying and addressing the gaps between the current and future workforce resources and needs.
Strategic Workforce Planning Defined
It provides a rational basis for prioritising, developing, and funding the people practices to support the university strategy and objectives.
Right LocationRight People Right Time with the Right Cost
MERCER 8
Funding / Budget Funding decline or increase
Increasing productivity requirements
Increasing revenue
Programs / Courses Policy changes
New programs or courses
Consolidation of programs or courses
Operational New technology
Process improvements
... to deliver specific outcomes
Workforce scenariosthat focus on…
3 – 5 year scenarios
Strategic Workforce Planning... ... starts by understanding where the university is headed, and the turns it could take.
Re-calibrating for change
Increasing productivity
Improving performance
Investing for future expansion
Building capabilities from within
Costs Counts
Capabilities Structure
Locations
MERCER 9
Strategic Workforce PlanningKey process steps
Workforce Solution Design (Workforce Plan)
Workforce Analysis (Supply, Demand & Gap)
Strategic Setting & Preparation
Understand organisation strategy
drivers
Analysing current workforce structure
Identifying critical capabilities and roles
Current & Future Workforce Supply
Current & Future Workforce Demand
GAP ANALYSIS
LOCATIONPEOPLE TIME/COST
Buy Solutions(recruiting, co-& outsourcing, partnering)
Build Solutions(developing, retaining, insourcing)
Redeploy Solutions(exit, transfer, turnover)
A Workforce Plan describes actionable solutions and their impact on workforce gaps / risks.
STRATEGIC WORKFORCE
PLAN
MERCER 10
Workforce Planning – Review of last decadeFour Archetypes of Alignment
Slow to react
Dem
and
01‘-02‘ 03‘-04‘ 05‘-06‘ 07‘-08‘ 09‘-10‘
Overreaction
Dem
and
01‘-02‘ 03‘-04‘ 05‘-06‘ 07‘-08‘ 09‘-10‘
Business Demand Workforce Portfolio
Cautious
Dem
and
01‘-02‘ 03‘-04‘ 05‘-06‘ 07‘-08‘ 09‘-10‘
Alignment
Dem
and
01‘-02‘ 03‘-04‘ 05‘-06‘ 07‘-08‘ 09‘-10‘
e.g. Energy /Telcos
e.g.Banks /
Consulting
e.g. Automotive/
Manufacturing
e.g.Services /
Investment Banks
MERCER 11
Current State
Traditional Planning Scenario Planning
How should we translate our organisation strategy / plan to future workforce demand scenarios?
Appropriate for long-term planning and to force “out-of-the-box” thinking.
FUTURETODAY
Option AFunding
Increased
Option BFunding
Maintained
Option C Funding
Cut
Current State
Appropriate in relatively stable environment.
“Best” case (+10 %)
“Base”case
“Worst” case
(-10 %)
FUTURETODAY
Current State
MERCER 12Mercer / The Conference Board, 2010
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Budget driven headcount planning
Workforce dashboards
Strategic workforce
planning & analytics
Humancapital planning
• Headcount data (FTE) • Retrospective, static analysis and
reporting (e.g. cost, basic demographic data)
• Internal and external labour market analysis data
• Benchmarking (e.g. attrition, productivity, HR processes)
• Shared view on critical workforce segments, capabilities + gaps
• Predictive models and scenarios
• Integrated in organisation strategy process
• Organisation-wide governance (e.g. COE for Analytics and Planning)
OPERATIONAL STRATEGIC
Maturity of Workforce Planning & AnalyticsDifferent levels of maturity in organisations
MERCER 13November 4, 2013 13
2013 Mercer Research with the World Economic Forum (WEF)GLOBAL GOOD PRACTICE REPORT
MERCER 14November 4, 2013 14 14
2013 Mercer Research with the World Economic Forum (WEF)TALENT INVESTMENT RISING
FEW HAVE HIGHLY EFFECTIVE TALENT PLANS
MERCER 15
61% of universities have a strategic workforce plan
PREVALENCE OF A WORKFORCE PLANNING STRATEGY
MERCER 16
Of those that have a plan, most have a time horizon of 1-5 years
PERIOD COVERED IN A WORKFORCE PLAN
MERCER 17
Workforce planning strategies are heavily dependent on student demand for courses
CONSIDERATIONS WHEN DEVISING A WORKFORCE PLANNING STRATEGY
MERCER 18November 4, 2013
The Analytics Journey
MERCER 19
Reactivechecks
Simulations& forecasting
Correlations
BenchmarksOn-goingreports
Causalmodeling
Anecdotes
Measurement continuum
Moving from ‘I Think’ To ‘I Know’
Least powerful
Most powerful
MERCER
20Mor
eSo
phis
ticat
ion
Les
s50% of universities most frequently use basic workforce analytics. The remaining 50% use external or internal benchmarking.No universities are using more advanced analytics
CURRENT ANALYTICS
Basic analytics such as ongoing headcount/turnover reports are most frequently used
MERCER 21
Projections and forecasts are approaches that will enable universities to make better workforce decisions
Mor
eSo
phis
ticat
ion
L
ess
Better workforce decisions are made as a result of more sophisticated workforce analytics such as future forecasts and projections based on current data
WORKFORCE PLANNING
MERCER 22
Vice Chancellors and Senior Executives, Managers and HR are all interested in the use of workforce analytics
INTEREST
Survey participants strongly agree that HR leaders and Senior Executives and VCs are interested in workforce analytics (e.g. projections, simulations, predictive modelling)
MERCER 23
HR functions have the skills to conduct basic analytics
Basic Analytics
Sophisticated Analytics
HR SKILLS
• Most HR functions have the skills and capabilities to conduct basic workforce analytics such as ongoing reports and benchmarks
• However, many lack the skills to perform sophisticated skills such as projections, simulations and predictive modelling
Strongly disagree
MERCER 24
Workforce analysis is generally completed by a Centre of Excellence (CoE) consisting of ~0.5 – 2 FTEs
RESOURCING
23% have workforce analytics decentralised throughout the university
9% are currently decentralised but have plans for COEwithin 12 months
68% of universities complete workforce analysisin a Centre of Excellence
76% of universities have 0.5 – 2 FTE responsible for workforce related analysis
4% of universities have 0 FTE responsible for workforce analysis16% of universities
have 3 – 5 FTE in workforce analysis
4% of universities have 6 - 10 FTE responsible for workforce analysis
MERCER 25
Universities want to use workforce analytics to support workforce planning and drive efficiency gains
REASONS FOR FUTURE USE OF WORKFORCE ANALYTICS
MERCER 26
FOUNDATIONAL ADVANCED
Output
Information
Uses
Tools
Counts, rates, and tabulations
WHAT is happening: What is our turnover rate? How many promotions did
we make? What are spans of control? What is current productivity?
Reporting (internal and external) Tracking progress toward goals Monitoring trends
Business intelligence
Proven cause-and-effect relationships
WHY | HOW to change it: Why do people quit? What experiences are linked to
advancement? What are optimal spans? How can productivity increase?
Analyse alignment Informing policy decisions Direction to achieve goals
Statistical modeling techniques
The Journey: Two Categories of Measurement
MERCER 27
• Every organisation has an internal labour market –either by design or default
• People come in, advance, and leave
• Employees play to the organisation’s values… …rules…rewards
• Leadership’s choices and investments produceexceptional, nominal, or negative effects
• Descriptive analysis
The Concept (1 ) ILM Mapping
• Causal analysis (drivers)
(2) ILM Analysis®
Internal Labour Markets (ILM) Combining Foundational (1) with Advanced Analytics (2)
Promotions
7
6
4
8
5
3
HIRES EXITSCAREERLEVEL
Lateral Moves
Total Employees
MERCER 28
The real power of ILM analysis® comes from measuring and modeling the drivers of these talent flows
11
72
125
190
312
116
Hires17
49
123
184
227
86
Exits
Promotions
7 517
6 640
4 963
Level 8 168
5 830
Careerlevel
3 383
Lateral moves
234
45
341
186
81
38
16
81
85
134
129
Totalworkers11
72
125
190
312
116
Hires17
49
123
184
227
86
Exits
Promotions
7 5177 517
6 6406 640
4 9634 963
Level 8 168Level 8 168
5 830
Careerlevel
3 3833 383
Lateral moves
234
45
341
186
81
38
16
81
85
134
129
TotalworkersKnow who
you are selecting
Know what you are
rewarding
Know what accounts for performance differences
Know what retains
employees
MERCER 29
Advanced Analytics: Example for ILM Analysis®
Previous surveys of perceptions
suggested that pay and workload were most critical to employee
commitment.
The analysis of actual behaviour showed
that career opportunities most affected retention.
Previous surveys of perceptions
suggested that pay and workload were most critical to employee
commitment.
The analysis of actual behaviour showed
that career opportunities most affected retention.
The models on which these results are based control for individual attributes, organisational factors, and external influences.
Disguised case example
MERCER 30November 4, 2013
Case Study: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
MERCER 31
People Imperatives Business Situation
Increasing importance of generalists to complement existing specialist staff
Develop a more efficient and flexible talent deployment model
Maintain engagement under increasing cost constraints
Global economic power shift (G7 to G20) resulting in increasing breadth of member needs
More demands for multi-disciplinary research
OECDThe Value of Drivers Analysis
MERCER 32
ILM Map (3 year timeframe)
From outside | from temp role Voluntary | total
1|41|4
17|617|6
19|919|9
76|676|6
40|140|1
7|07|0
5|05|0
9|99|9
17|2417|24
9|129|12
7|187|18
3|103|10
20|5620|56
12|4412|44
5|145|14
3|93|9
6|206|20
10|2710|27
4|94|91
18
27
21
2
15
30
12
4
Promotions
1|51|56969
109109
310310
249249
282282
4646
446446
339339
121121
5151
B5, B6
B4
B3
B1, B2
C
Grade Hires: 200|68Hires: 200|68
<9>
<10>
<16>
<5>
<3>
<Laterals: 69> Exits: 71|212Exits: 71|212Average active employees: 2,022Average active employees: 2,022
10
A6, A7
A5
A4
A2, A3
A1
<2>
<3>
<7>
<13>
<1>
MERCER 33
-85%
-77%
-48%
-47%
-44%
-26%
-17%
101%
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%
Changed Department (within grd)*
Supervisor vs. Individual Contributor
French citizenship
Changed from "temporary"*
Supervisor's span (3+ Ees)
Tenure (5+ yrs)
General experience/age (5+ yrs)
Pay increase
Annual salary
Promoted this year
Changed job or job family (within grd)
Rating: Outstand vs. Satisfactory*
Percentage difference in probability of voluntary turnover next year
More likely to quitLess likely to quit
Turnover Drivers Analysis Importance of lateral movement, supervision, and performance
No effect
The models on which these results are based control for individual attributes and organisational factors. All effects are significant at the 5% level unless otherwise noted. Models account for Departments, Grades and Job Families. *The effect is significant at the 10% level.
MERCER 34
-64%
-30%
-22%
14%
30%
46%
68%
93%
137%
176%
-100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200%
Promoted this year
Annual salary (€10k+)
General experience/age (5+ yrs)
Changed job or job family (within grd)
Tenure
Level to supervisor (1+)
Supervisor's own span (2+ Ees)
Took management training
Rating: Outstand vs. Satisfactory
Rating: Excellent vs. Satisfactory
Changed Department (same grade)
Supervisor vs. Individual Contributor
Percentage difference in probability of promotion next year
More likely to be promotedLess likely to be promoted
The models on which these results are based control for individual attributes and organisational factors. All effects are significant at the 5% level unless otherwise noted. Models account for Departments, Grades and Job Families. *The effect is significant at the 10% level.
Progression Drivers Analysis Mobility & supervision also strongly linked to employee success
MERCER 35
BUILD HR Strategy
Workforce Planning & Analytics
RUN Employee Lifecycle Management
Recruitment, Selection
&Onboarding
Compensation&
Benefits
PerformanceManagement
Administration (Payroll, Employee Benefits, Time Mgmt, Mobility, etc.)
Development&
Mobility
Retention &
Exit Mgmt
Talent Management
SWFP & analytics was key input to
align programs along the employee lifecycle
SUSTAIN Communication, Change Management, Organisational Development
SUPPORTOrganisation & Roles HRIS (eHR)
Summary of Insights Impact on rewards, mobility, development and communication
MERCER 36
The crux of workforce planning is enquiry, not just number crunching.
You need both broad directional insights and granular details about your workforce.
Your workforce plan should tell a story. Even basic analysis can provide some clarity. Leverage the data you’ve already got.
Make process and tools simple and efficient to use, and find the right people (skills) to support the process.
Workforce planning is not an “event”; build capabilities over time; don’t do it all at once.
1
2
4
3
5
Closing thoughts and lessons learned
MERCER 37
Principal, Human Capital Strategy & Workforce Planning Leader, Pacific
Phone: 02 8864 6463Email: [email protected]
Ephraim Spehrer-Patrick
Principal, Leadership & Organisational Performance
Phone: 03 9623 5223Email: [email protected]
Olivia Tsen