56
Strategic Development Information & GIS Kevin Tabisher | Manager: Information and Knowledge Strategy Corporate Services: Strategic Development Information & GIS Information and Knowledge Management

Strategic Development Information & GIS Kevin Tabisher | Manager: Information and Knowledge Strategy Corporate Services: Strategic Development Information

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Strategic Development Information & GIS

Kevin Tabisher | Manager: Information and Knowledge StrategyCorporate Services: Strategic Development Information & GIS

Information and Knowledge Management

1. Overview of City IKM

2. DIRC demo

3. Strategic Information (Research and Statistics)

4. Corporate GIS

5. Spatial Viewer demo

6. Q&A

Index

Strategic Development Information

& GIS

Information &KnowledgeStrategy

CorporateGIS

Strategic Information

Knowledge Resources &

Support

Strategic Development Information & GIS

Information and KM strategy

Programme for development of IKM within departments.

Spatial data management/ consultancy/ co-ordination Town Survey Marks

GPS Surveys

Aerial photography

Socio-economic Needs Analysis

Urban Indicators

Policy Research

Research Consultancy

Knowledge Resource Centre

Communications & Marketing

Organisational Dev

Administration

IKM Partnerships(Change Management and building Content)

IKM Policy(Improving Practices

and Governance)

Knowledge Hub(Integrated Information)

Knowledge Management Framework

+Implementation

Plan

IKM Audit

City’s IKM Development Path

Better Decision-making through

Business Intelligence (BI)

Improving access to knowledge

assets/ Knowledge reuse

Retaining Social/Human

Capital

Research and Innovation

Data Management

KM

KE

Y A

RE

AS 1 2 3 4 5

Better Practices Risk Management Legal Compliance

KM FRAMEWORK

Departmental/Programme Drivers

• Spatial Reporting Tool +ISIS Viewer

• SAP BI

• SAP – GIS Integration

• Integrated Spatial

Information System (ISIS)

• Spatial Information

Strategy

• Knowledge Hub (City Development Information Resource Centre)

• City Internet Portal

• SharePoint

• Communities of

Practice

• Coaching and Mentoring

• Expertise Locator

• Exit interviews

• Job shadowing

• CHEC

• SACN KM Reference Group

• DBSA – LGRC/ LGNET

• Linking with external agencies

• CREW

• Data Management Framework

• Data Governance

• IKM Directory

• KM Principles

KM

INIT

IAT

IVE

S

Year 1 (2011) Year 2 (2012) Year 3 (2013) Year 4 (2014) Year 5 (2015)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Phased IKM Implementation Approach

Phase 1: Enabling IKM Infrastructure

Phase 2: Embedding IKM Culture

Shift focus from information management to analysis

Phase 3: Entrenching IKM Practice

Established Analytical Products

IKM Infrastructure

Monitoring and Review

Extend IKM Partnerships to rest of departments

Develop Change Management Plan/Marketing & Awareness IKM Partnerships part of

organisational business processes

Implement IKM Partnerships with lead/priority departments

KNOWLEDGE HUB (DIRC): supporting projects:ISIS, Spatial Reporting Tool, Expertise Locator, IKM (Data) Directory, Research Hub, Stats, Info and Trends, IKM Policy

PARTNERSHIPS: First Phase: Community Services; Strategy and Planning, Utility Services, Transport

SERVICE PROTOCOLS:IS & T; Communication

AWARENESS: Via intranet to all Directorates & Departments

CHANGE MANAGEMENT: Internal processes & procedures

IKM Policy Implementation

IKM Partnerships(Information and knowledge being

contributed by departments)

Knowledge hub/portal – DIRC(Integrating information and knowledge

corporately)

Knowledge Products(Information and knowledge being shared

across the City)

Departments

Users

SDI & GIS (corporate)

Growing and sharing the City’s knowledge base

The need for a corporate IKM Policy

Information and knowledge assets reside in individual departments

Challenges in relation to departments/directorates prioritising corporate integration and sharing of information

Policy required to ensure departments share relevant knowledge across the organisation

How do we drive IKM corporately?

IKM Needs(Corporate

&Departmental)

IKM Policy(Improving Practices)

Content(Getting departments to

share information)IKM Partnerships

Mutually beneficial relationship

Clearly stipulated requirements or goals

Commitment

Shared IKM Vision

Clear Partnership Process

Moving from uncoordinated IKM engagements to more formally structured engagements

Strategic Development Information & GIS

Carol Wright| Manager: Strategic InformationCorporate Services: Strategic Development Information & GIS

Research and Statistics

Purpose

Research:

Share information on City of Cape Town Research Management Policy and the Research Hub

Research Management Policy Framework and Guidelines

Statistics:

Share some information on approach, use and examples of how statistics, in particular those from Statistics South Africa data have been analysed and used to inform decision-making and planning in CCT.

Research

Research Presentation Overview

Importance of research

Role of SDI & GIS

City of Cape Town Corporate

Research Management Policy

Framework and Guidelines

Research Management Tools

Knowledge is a key driver of an organisation’s effectiveness and a strategic input to

decision-making

Research efforts in CCT may include :Urban development research, M&E research, customer satisfaction research, service level research,

feasibility studies (including for large infrastructure projects), (urban issue related) modelling research, value chain analysis

It is imperative that the City’s efforts directed at knowledge generation and value addition to information (strategic & forward planning) form part of a coherent and coordinated research and management framework.

The importance of research

Role of SDI & GIS

The Department has a role at a corporate level to:

Support the City’s research activities on urban developmental matters - through combination of research facilitation activities (e.g. installing/managing corporate research tenders) and providing research advice

Provide a coherent overview of strategic knowledge which the City requires and acquires to take decisions and function effectively

Drive implementation of the CCT Research Management Policy Framework and Guidelines(CCT, 26 April 2011).

Provide the related guidelines and tools to line departments that allow them to improve the quality of, drive any research projects originating from within their department, and share the research outputs at different points along the research process.

Figure 1: City of Cape Town Research Management Framework

Line Departments

Strategic Information Department

KNOWLEDGE HUB

SPECIFIC RESEARCH

PLAN

City Strategic Imperatives City Development

Strategy Integrated

Development Plan Spatial Development

Framework Economic

Development Strategy

Transport Plan Others...

Strategic knowledge needs

Service Delivery/ Operational problem focussed knowledge needs

Triggering of research tracker

Standard research guidelines

IMPLEMENT RESEARCH

Research guidelines Possible triggering of

City Research Working Group

Re

City of Cape Town, 26 April 2011)

The intention of the Policy is to allow for the better management, co-ordination, storage, access and utilisation of research by all in the organization.

To promote easy access to and sharing of research information and outcomes

To avoid duplication of research

To improve the quality of important research and avoid basic errors

To increase capacity for conducting research at all levels throughout the City by providing guidelines for every step of the research process

Corporate Research Management Policy Framework and Guidelines

Research management tools

City Research Working Group (CREW) –

inter-directorate structure – to identify and advise on

strategic research needs and operationalise research

policy implementation

Research Hub – part of DIRC, an online platform for sharing planned completed research – and the tools for sharing that – using the research initiation form (RIF), and (shared) metadata

Online tools for tracking current research

Gather inputs to formulate a forward-focussed research plan

Corporate tender – urban development research

Challenges

Use of research: research problem – research - recommendations – action

Research capacity in line departments

Sharing research (especially completed research)

Scoping and definition of research

Managing research service providers

Opportunities

Strengthen the link between research problem to action/use

Build capacity

Have a single access point to all City research

Guidelines for scoping research

Defining research services and standards

Improve the quality of research

Statistics

Statistics Presentation Overview

Key dimensions of evidence-based

statistics

Broad approach

Importance and use of statistical data

Policy and planning context and alignment

Use of Stats SA data analysis – range of examples

Evidence based decision-making: challenges & opportunities

Broad Approach

Data to Information to Knowledge to Action to Outcomes

Evidence base

Policy relevant

Better policies

Enhanced decision-making

Better development

results

Monitoring & feedback

Technical Rigour

(Adapted from Data UNity Network, 2011, http://www.unescap.org/stat/data-unity/Data-UNity-Network-Presentation-EGM-Oct2011.pdf)

Key Dimensions of Evidenced based Statistics

Institutional EnvironmentThe institutional and organisational factors which may impact on the

effectiveness and credibility of the agency producing the statistics

RelevanceThe degree to which information meets the needs of users.

Timeliness The delay between the reference period and the release of the information.

Accuracy The degree to which the information correctly describes the phenomena being measured.

Coherence The degree to which the information can be brought together with other information, and over time.

InterpretabilityThe availability of supplementary information necessary to interpret the statistical information.

Accessibility The ease with which the information can be obtained

(Australian Statistics Bureau, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/lookup/1500.0chapter32010)

Importance & use of statistical data

Reliable urban development analysis and

understanding depends on good and current data.

Currently this is one of the major challenges for cities in South

Africa.

It is important for the City of Cape Town as a municipality to use official STATS SA data:

- to align with the official public sector source

- to provide a reference and basis for continuity

The City’s corporate approach is for all City Departments to use a consistent set of demographic, socio-economic and other figures.

Importance & use of statistical data Key inputs to:

Policy making, decision making and monitoring :

- City Development Strategy; Economic Growth Strategy;

Social Development Strategy; Spatial Development Framework

5 year IDP 2012-2017

Planning – long, medium and short term: strategic, operational, management

- Growth Management Strategy 5 year Housing Plan Water Demand Plan

Service delivery

- water, electricity, sanitation, waste management; transport; human

settlements, health, community services, transport, broad band network

Financial planning and management

- Equitable share, MTREF

Operations and management - asset management plan

Policy – Planning context & alignment

National Provincial Local

National

Development

Plan 2030

OneCape2040

CCT CDS

CCT IDP

CCT Local

Plans

City of Cape Town – 2011 Census – Cape Town December 2012

Compiled by Strategic Development Information and GIS Department, City of Cape Town 2011 and 2001 Census data supplied by Statistics South Africa (Based on information available at the time of compilation as released by Statistics South Africa) Demographic Profile, Economic Profile, Household Services Profile Cape Town Overview – 2011 Census

Cape Town 2001 2011 Change 2001 to 2011

Number % Population 2 892 243 3 740 025 847 782 29.3% Households 777 389 1 068 572 291 183 37.5% Average Household Size 3.72 3.50

In 2011 the population of Cape Town was 3 740 025, an increase of 29.3% since 2001, and the number of households was 1 068 572, an increase of 37.5% since 2001. The average household size has declined from 3.72 to 3.50 in the 10 years. A household is defined as a group of persons who live together, and provide themselves jointly with food or other essentials for living, or a single person who lives alone (Statistics South Africa). The population and household numbers above are to be used and quoted as the official numbers for Cape Town for 2011. Key results for Cape Town:

The population is predominantly Coloured (42%) and Black African (39%).

46% of those aged 20 years and older have completed Grade 12 or higher.

76% of the labour force (aged 15 to 64) is employed.

47% of households earn R3 200 or less a month.

78% of households live in formal dwellings.

87% of households have access to piped water in their dwelling or inside their yard.

88% of households have access to a flush toilet connected to the public sewer system.

94% of households have their refuse removed at least once a week.

94% of households use electricity for lighting in their dwelling.

Note: There are small variations in the total population and the number of households in the profile tables which follow. These occur as Statistics South Africa had to calculate the true population to correct omissions and double counts in the enumeration process. These variations are not significant. Go to top of document

2011 Census Profile

Use of Stats SA

Data&

Analysis

Census 2011

City of Cape Town – 2011 Census – Ward 001 January 2013

Compiled by Strategic Development Information and GIS Department, City of Cape Town 2011 and 2001 Census data supplied by Statistics South Africa (Based on information available at the time of compilation as released by Statistics South Africa) Ward Overview, Demographic Profile, Economic Profile, Household Services Profile Ward Description Ward 001 includes the areas of De Duin, Glenwood, Kaapzicht, Kleinbosch, Monte Vista, N1 City, Panorama, Plattekloof, Plattekloof Glen, Sonnendal, Tygerdal and Welgelegen

2011

Census

Ward

Profile

Cape Town – Census 2011 Population Change

• In 2011 the population of Cape Town was 3 740 025, an increase of 29.3% since 2001.

• In period 1996 – 2011 (15 years), the: - population of Cape Town has increased 46% - composition of the population has changed e.g. Black African population increased 124 %

• Cape Town 2011 population is in line with previous City estimates

Cape Town – Census 2011:– Age Trends

0 to 4 years 5 to 14 years 15 to 24 years 25 to 64 years 65 years and older0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

9.4%

18.8% 19.0%

46.7%

5.0%

8.7%

17.9%20.0%

48.4%

5.0%

9.9%

14.9%18.4%

51.3%

5.5%

1996 2001 2011

• 57% of Cape Town’s population is over 25 years • 18% are between 15 - 24 years, 10% are 4 years or younger• 2011 median age of the population in Cape Town is 28 years• Proportion in the 5 - 24 years age groups declining • Young Black African and Coloured age cohorts• Older White and Asian age cohorts. The population is starting to age, in particular White

population group

Black African Coloured Asian White Other Total75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

78.2%

93.2%

97.7% 98.5%

94.7%

88.2%

3.2%

2.0%

2.5%

1.2%

8.9%

2.3%

4.5%

4.9%

1.8% 2.7%

Flush toilet (connected to sewerage system) Flush toilet (with septic tank) Chemical toilet

Pit toilet with ventilation (VIP) Pit toilet without ventilation Bucket toilet

Other None

Cape Town – Census 2011Services data - Sanitation

  2001 2011Flush toilet (connected to sewerage system)

85.3% 88.2%

Flush toilet (with septic tank)

2.0% 2.0%

Chemical toilet 0.2% 1.2%Pit toilet with ventilation

0.3% 0.2%

Pit toilet without ventilation

0.6% 0.2%

Bucket toilet 4.4% 4.5%Other   1.0%None 7.2% 2.7%Total 100.0% 100.0%

Note: Population Group is that of the Head of Household

• 88% of households have access to a flush toilet connected to the public sewer system (78% of Black African households)

• 4.5% of households have access to a bucket toilet.

• 3% of households have no toilet (decrease from 7% in 2001)

Overall

Very NeedyNeedy

Average

Concentration of need in

Metro South East

• Khayelitsha • Mitchells

Plain • South East

Index and weighting:

• Household Services:

30%• Education:

20%• Housing:

20%• Economic:

30%

Census 2011: Socio- economic Index Cape Town (Wards)

Census 2011:Metro South East(Wards)

Index and weighting: • Household Services: 30%• Education: 20%• Housing: 20%• Economic: 30%

Census – Community Profiles: Libraries and Information (based on 2001 Census data)

Community profiles of the area that falls within 3 km of each library as part of the “know your community project”

General Household Surveys

1 Grant 2 Grants 3 Grants Over 3 Grants0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

54.8%

26.0%

10.9%8.3%

50.4%

27.4%

14.2%8.1%

79.4%

18.3%

2.2%

53.5%

26.4%

12.3%7.8%

Black African Coloured White Total

Number of social grants per household

The number of social grants received per household by population group of household head in Cape Town in 2011 (Source: 2011 General Household Survey Data, Statistics SA)

2011Black

African Coloured White Total

Yes67.4% 72.8% 77.7% 71.0%

No

31.8% 26.7% 22.3% 28.5%

Do not know

0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5%

Total

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Exposure of children in Cape Town under 5 years to ECD programmes in 2011 by population group(Source: 2011 General Household Survey Data, Statistics SA)

General Household Surveys

Office

is at

hom

e

Wal

king

Bicycle

/mot

orcy

cle

Min

ibus

taxi

/seda

n ta

xiBus

Trai

n

Lift c

lub

usin

g a

priva

te ve

hicle

Privat

e /co

mpa

ny ve

hicle

Unspe

cifie

d

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2009 1010 2011

Mode of transport used to commute to work in Cape Town for 2009, 2010 and 2011(Source: 2009, 2010 and 2011 General Household Survey Data, Statistics SA)

Quarterly Labour Force Surveys

Analysis of Q2 2008-2012

City of Cape Town – Access

• Access to data, information and knowledge is critical

• Data awareness

• Data quality

• Fit for purpose

• Need to bring data providers and data users together

• Provide client focused data and information

• Good track record: in 2009 the City of Cape Town was the proud overall winner in the "Dissemination" category in the Statistics South Africa Awards for Excellence.

Evidence based decision-making: Challenges

Limited city/municipality level – local area data

Census takes place every 10 years

Need for more disaggregated data and at various spatial levels

Need for integrated datasets

Need for coherence across various data sources

Statistical literacy to understand and interpret data correctly

Expectation of users to be able to manipulate data by themselves

Evidence base decision-making: Opportunities

Firm foundation, commitment, capacity and mix of skills to produce quality information

Partnerships and collaboration

Need to become “knowledge builders”

Need to become “communicators” and “educators”

Need to maintain relevance and impartiality in light of the changing context

In future:

- explore the use of social media for access and inclusion of

information from public

- open data

Closure

The City recognises the importance of

valid and quality information in the urban development process.

Need to continue to improve and further develop evidence based information and make it accessible, in order to support well informed decisions and planning for policies, programmes and projects.

ENKOSI DANKIE THANK YOU

Strategic Development Information & GIS

Stefan Steenekamp | Principal GIS AnalystCorporate Services: Strategic Development Information & GIS

Corporate GIS

1. Priority Areas within Corporate GIS

2. Corporate GIS Vision

3. Spatial Information Portal

4. Questions

Index

Spatial Information Strategy Goals: 2008

Spatial information that is reliable, trusted and interoperableStrengthen the integrated, enterprise-wide management of spatial information to ensure sharingEffective dissemination to ensure accessibility & use Effective governance model to ensure co-operation and coordination Effective support via human resource and technology infrastructure

Priority areas within Corporate GIS

Approved Spatial Information Strategy & Policy

Enterprise wide Spatial Information Management

Implementation of a Spatial Information Portal

GIS/Spatial Data Governance & Partnerships

1

2

3

4

Professional GIS GIS forEveryone

Publish

Corporate GIS: Vision

Interactive Maps

Static Maps

Data Directory

Projects

News/Discussions

Policy & Standards

Business Viewers

Spatial Information Portal (live demo)

We aim to move GIS forward in a coordinated way

We want everyone to be able to use GIS

Inform decision making by using GIS

Conclusion (CGIS)

Year 1 (2011) Year 2 (2012) Year 3 (2013) Year 4 (2014) Year 5 (2015)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Phased IKM Implementation Approach

Phase 1: Enabling IKM Infrastructure

Phase 2: Embedding IKM Culture

Shift focus from information management to analysis

Phase 3: Entrenching IKM Practice

Established Analytical Products

IKM Infrastructure

Monitoring and Review

Extend IKM Partnerships to rest of departments

Develop Change Management Plan/Marketing & Awareness IKM Partnerships part of

organisational business processes

Implement IKM Partnerships with lead/priority departments

KNOWLEDGE HUB (DIRC): supporting projects:ISIS, Spatial Reporting Tool, Expertise Locator, IKM (Data) Directory, Research Hub, Stats, Info and Trends, IKM Policy

PARTNERSHIPS: First Phase: Community Services; Strategy and Planning, Utility Services, Transport

SERVICE PROTOCOLS:IS & T; Communication

AWARENESS: Via intranet to all Directorates & Departments

CHANGE MANAGEMENT: Internal processes & procedures

IKM Policy Implementation

Year 1 (2011) Year 2 (2012) Year 3 (2013) Year 4 (2014) Year 5 (2015)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Next Phases of IKM Implementation

Phase 1: Enabling IKM Infrastructure

Phase 2: Embedding IKM Culture

Phase 3: Entrenching IKM Practice

• Enhance content• Enhance Knowledge

Tools: Spatial Information

and Mapping Portal (SIMP)

Stats, Trends and Indicators

• Add functionality• Develop outward-facing

version of DIRC

• IKM Policy rollout• Address analysis

capacity • Extend IKM

Partnerships• Accelerate uptake and

growth of DIRC• Build corporate

strategic information platform

• Provide established analytical products

• Provide self-service to strategic information

• Information and Knowledge Management an SDBIP requirement

• Monitoring and review

Year 1 (2011) Year 2 (2012) Year 3 (2013) Year 4 (2014) Year 5 (2015)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

City of Cape Town IKM Overview

Q&A