Upload
travis
View
52
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasting for Warn-on-Forecast. 5 th Warn-on-Forecast Workshop Dusty Wheatley 1 , Kent Knopfmeier 2 , and David Dowell 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasting for Warn-on-
Forecast
5th Warn-on-Forecast Workshop
Dusty Wheatley1, Kent Knopfmeier2, and David Dowell3
1,2Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman Oklahoma
3NOAA/Earth Systems Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
2 April 2014
Work highlights
1) Move to a GEFS-based NSSL Mesoscale Ensemble (NME)
– Provides for a regional convection-allowing (grid spacing ~3 km) ensemble on which to perform radar DA
1) Baseline EnKF experiment for 24 May 2011 using NME background
1) New initialization techniques + radar DA
– Convective initiation/suppression using an updraft nudging technique
NSSL Mesoscale Ensemble (NME)
• Currently: Regional convection-allowing grid (spacing 3 km) is event dependent• Ongoing work to consider the use of a single grid with horizontal spacing of 3 km
Retrospective work:
• 27 April 2011– Spring tornado outbreak– Southeastern United States
• 24 May 2011– Warm season tornadic event– Central Oklahoma
• 17 November 2013– Cool season tornadic event– Midwestern United States
24 May 2011 Tornadic Event
• First tornado reports in Oklahoma between 2015 – 2043 UTC
Ensemble description
• WRF-ARW v3.4.1
• 36-member ensemble, with physics diversity (same for storm-scale ensemble)
– Microphysics: Thompson– Cumulus: Kain-Fritsch, Grell, Tiedtke– Radiation (LW/SW): RRTM/Dudhia, RRTMG/RRTMG– PBL: YSU, MYJ, MYNN
• IC/BCs for *both* parent/nested grids downscaled from 21-member Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) at 0000 UTC 24 May 2011
– No IC/BC perturbations
• Parent/nested grids run simultaneously—from 0000 UTC—in a 1-way nest setup
– Only information exchange occurs at nest’s lateral boundary
Mesoscale data assimilation
• EnKF approach encoded in the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART)
• ‘Conventional’ observations (METAR, marine, radiosonde, ACARS, satellite-derived winds) assimilated every 1 h until 0300 UTC 25 May 2011
• Mesonet data assimilation on nested grid only
• No radar data assimilation in producing backgrounds
Ensemble-mean specific humidity at 1800 UTC
• System coupled with either NOAH or RAP land surface models
Dryline
Model soundings at 1800 UTC
• Near convective initiation • At KOUN in Norman, OK
Storm-scale experiments
• Start on nested grid at 1900 UTC
• Assimilate radial velocity and reflectivity (and mesonet) data every 5 min through the period 1900 – 2030 UTC– Frederick (KFDR), Vance Air Force Base (KVNX), and Twin Lakes (KTLX)
WSR-88D’s
• Cleaned radar data objectively analyzed to 6-km grid using Observation Processing and Wind Synthesis (OPAWS)
• Additive noise (T, Td, u, v) where refl. obs. indicate precip.
• Launch 1-h storm-scale ensemble forecasts (with no assimilation) at 2000 and 2030 UTC 24 May
• All plots displayed at 1.5 km AGL
Probability of REFL > 40 dBZ at 1.5 km AGLTop row: 1-h FCST init. @ 2000 UTC
Bottom row: 1-h FCST init. @ 2030 UTC
Vorticity swaths
• Probability of low-level (below ~2 km) vorticity exceeding some threshold; calculated every 5 min during 1-h forecast period
• Maximum probability value retrieved at each model gridpoint
Canton Lake EF-3, 2015-2043Lookeba EF-3, 2031-2046El Reno EF-5, 2050-2235
Forecast cold pools
• Ensemble mean 2-m temp. field calculated every 5 min during forecast period• Minimum 2-m temp. value retrieved at each model gridpoint
Updraft nudging technique
• In the manner of Naylor and Gilmore (2012)
• Modification to w tendency fields in the model
• Use radar reflectivity observations from the NSSL National Mosaic to automatically select where to:– initiate observed storms that are absent in the model forecasts – suppress unobserved regions of simulated storms– REFL obs. swapped out every 10 min
• Ultimately, a complement (not a substitute) to radar DA, similar to additive noise
No wforce
No wforce
With wforce
Vorticity swaths (1915-2015 UTC)
Probability of REFL > 40 dBZ at 1.5 km AGL25-min fcst valid 1940 UTC
Vorticity swaths (1930-2030 UTC)
Ongoing Work
• Collective evaluation of backgrounds generated for earlier listed cases, and severe events during the period 15 – 31 May 2013– Impact of choice of land surface model
• Impact of horizontal resolution, microphysics, etc. on storm-scale results
• Further investigate the use of updraft nudging technique within ensemble-based framework
• Use the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) software for preprocessing observations and computing prior ensemble estimates